Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Atherosclerosis. 2018 Mar 22;272:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.037

Table 4.

Linear regressions of low ABI (<1.0) on physical performance and fatigability

Outcomes Low ABI (<1.0) n=39
HABC PPB, score β 95% CI p value

Unadjusted −0.47 [−0.65, −0.29] <0.001
Model 1 −0.27 [−0.43, −0.11] 0.001
Model 2 −0.26 [−0.42, −0.10] 0.001

RPE, score β 95% CI p value

Unadjusted 1.68 [0.83, 2.52] <0.001
Model 1 1.10 [0.31, 1.90] 0.006
Model 2 1.08 [0.28, 1.88] 0.008
Model 3 0.95 [0.16, 1.74] 0.019

Third tertile is the reference group for all the models: β coefficients are differences compared to third tertile.

Bold font indicates a statistically significant difference compared to third tertile (p-value <0.05).

Model 1: adjusted for age sex race BMI.

Model 2: adjusted for Model 1+ history of congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, TLAC and height (only time to complete LDCW and poor walking endurance)

Model 3: adjusted for Model 2+ tiredness, low energy.

RPE, Borg rating of perceived exertion (6–20); HABC PPB: health ABC physical performance battery score (0–4).