Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jun;11(6):e006131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.006131

Role of Three-Dimensional Architecture of Scar and Surviving Tissue in Ventricular Tachycardia: Insights from High-Resolution Ex Vivo Porcine Models

Farhad Pashakhanloo 1, Daniel A Herzka 1, Henry Halperin 2, Elliot R McVeigh 1,3, Natalia Trayanova 1
PMCID: PMC5994925  NIHMSID: NIHMS965325  PMID: 29880529

Abstract

Background

An improved knowledge of the spatial organization of infarct structure and its contribution to ventricular tachycardia (VT) is important for designing optimal treatments. This study explores the relationship between the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the healed infarct and the VT reentrant pathways in high-resolution models of infarcted porcine hearts.

Methods

Structurally-detailed models of infarcted ventricles were reconstructed from ex vivo late gadolinium enhancement and diffusion tensor MRI data of eight chronically infarcted porcine hearts at submillimeter resolution (0.25×0.25×0.5 mm3). To characterize the 3D structure of surviving tissue in the zone of infarct, a novel scar-mapped thickness metric was introduced. Further, using the ventricular models, electrophysiological simulations were conducted to determine and analyze the 3D VT pathways that were established in each of the complex infarct morphologies.

Results

The scar-mapped thickness metric revealed the heterogeneous organization of infarct and enabled us to systematically characterize the distribution of surviving tissue thickness in eight hearts. Simulation results demonstrated the involvement of a sub-endocardial tissue layer of varying thickness in the majority of VT pathways. Importantly, they revealed that VT pathways are most frequently established within thin surviving tissue structures of thickness ≤ 2.2 mm (90th percentile) surrounding the scar.

Conclusions

The combination of high-resolution imaging data and ventricular simulations revealed the 3D distribution of surviving tissue surrounding the scar and demonstrated its involvement in VT pathways. The new knowledge obtained in this study contributes toward a better understanding of infarct-related VT.

Keywords: ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmia (mechanisms), myocardial infarction, late gadolinium enhancement, computer simulations

Journal Subject Terms: Arrhythmias, Electrophysiology, Myocardial Infarction, Mechanisms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Introduction

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening rapid heart rhythm disorder that frequently occurs in the presence of myocardial infarction (MI)1. Structural and electrophysiological (EP) remodeling associated with the infarct causes conduction irregularities that can lead to the formation of reentrant circuits in the heart2,3. Reentry has been identified as a major mechanism underlying VT associated with healed or healing MI in the human4. The formation of reentrant circuits associated with MI is a complex phenomenon that depends on factors ranging from the cellular scale to the whole heart3. Of particular importance is the spatial distribution of the scar and the surviving tissue in the zone of infarct because the mixture of the two tissues can form complex tortuous pathways for electrical activation510. Accurate characterization of the tissue architecture within the zone of infarct is therefore essential for the complete understanding of the mechanisms of infarct-related reentrant arrhythmias.

The current gold-standard for non-invasive imaging of MI in patients is clinical late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI.11. MI signal intensity information from LGE-MRI has been correlated with endocardial voltage maps12,13. It has also been used to identify conducting channels14,15 and critical isthmus sites of VT in the infarct1618. Moreover, MI signal intensity characteristics in LGE-MRI has been demonstrated to be a strong predictor for global susceptibility to arrhythmia and post-infarction mortality1921. Despite the utility of clinical LGE-MRI in identifying potential substrates for VT and assessing risk for arrhythmias, its limited spatial resolution in human imaging hinders the accurate characterization of the underlying 3D structure and conductive pathways in the zone of infarct involved in VT.

Ex vivo imaging of large animal and human hearts allows data acquisition at high spatial resolution and image quality, which is otherwise impossible to achieve in a beating heart. Ex vivo MRI data has been used in many studies to characterize the structure of the human and large animal hearts under normal22 and disease23,24 conditions. It has also enabled construction of individualized computational models of such hearts to explore arrhythmia mechanisms2528. A comprehensive investigation of the role of infarct structure on arrhythmias at the whole heart level requires, however, computational models that capture the complex geometry of the infarct; therefore, the images must resolve the intricate features of the scar at a resolution higher than previously achieved, such as sub-millimeter resolution. Such models could provide new insights on the VT mechanisms and lead to an improved interpretation of clinical recordings of electrical activity in the zone of infarct.

The two primary goals of the current study are: 1) to use high-resolution (sub-millimeter) whole heart ex vivo MRI data to characterize the 3D structure of the surviving myocardium within the zone of infarct, and 2) to employ whole ventricular modeling to investigate the VT pathways emerging from the complex architecture of 3D scar and surviving tissue surrounding it. An improved knowledge of the spatial organization of the infarct in high resolution and its contribution to arrhythmia is important for designing optimal treatments for VT.

Methods

The data, analytic methods, and study materials will be made available to other researchers for purposes of reproducing the results or replicating the procedure.

Late gadolinium enhancement and diffusion tensor (DT) MRI data acquisition

The ventricular data used here was acquired in a previous study using high-resolution ex vivo LGE and DT-MRI techniques in 8 chronically infarcted porcine hearts with anteroseptal infarction (MI age: 6.9 ± 2.9 months)24, in accordance with the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). One LGE imaging provided detailed information about ventricular and infarct geometries. Images were obtained using a T1-weighted gradient echo sequence with the following scan parameters: acquired resolution 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.50 mm3, reconstructed voxel size: 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm3, echo time (TE) = 2.3 ms, repetition time (TR) = 12 ms, flip-angle = 15°, scan duration: 1 hour (see Supplementary Material for a description of specimen preparation prior to ex vivo imaging). The DT-MRI acquisition in the same hearts provided data on the subject-specific fiber orientation; it was performed using a customized 3D spin echo sequence22. The acquired and reconstructed voxel dimensions for the diffusion images were 0.6 × 0.6 × 1.2 mm3, and 0.4 mm3 respectively, and the total scan duration was ~ 42 hours per heart. The primary eigenvectors of the diffusion tensors were calculated to determine the local orientation of the myofibers. Detailed methodology, including data acquisition and sample preparation can be found in previous publications22,24.

Ventricular model construction

We used the acquired ex vivo data, as described above, to construct, for the first time, detailed models of the intact large animal ventricles with infarction, with image-based fiber orientation and detailed scar geometry obtained at a voxel size of 0.03125 mm3 (~ 400 times smaller than that of clinical MRI). First, the left and right ventricles were segmented using an intensity-based thresholding of the LGE images to suppress the dark background. Then, an Otsu thresholding (n=2 regions) followed by a level-set segmentation algorithm was applied to separate heart tissue into regions of (enhanced) scar and (non-enhanced) myocardium (Figure 1A, left panel). The epicardial fat tissue and other image artifacts were removed from the segmentations using manual contouring and intensity-based thresholding. Further, a 3D finite-element mesh with tetrahedral elements was constructed for each heart from the segmented myocardial images using ScanIP software (Simpleware Ltd, United Kingdom). This process yielded volumetric meshes with locally adaptive spatial resolution to accurately preserve the fine details of the scar boundary (Figure 1A). A typical generated mesh had ~ 4 million nodes and ~ 20 million tetrahedral elements with an average edge length of ~350 μm. Fiber orientation was mapped onto each ventricular mesh from the corresponding DTMRI dataset24.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Workflow of the study including imaging, model construction, VT simulation protocol, and the calculation of scar-mapped local thickness (SMLT) metric. (A) Left: A short-axis slice of LGE-MRI acquired at the voxel size of 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.5 mm3. The segmented scar is highlighted in red. Right: 3D reconstructed model of the same heart with the scar highlighted in dark gray and myocardium in transparent gray. The red plane shows the location of the short-axis MRI slice that is displayed in the left panel. (B) Pacing protocol. Top: 3D distribution of pacing locations, Bottom: stimulus train (S1, S2, S3). (C) Calculation of surviving tissue thickness surrounding the scar using SMLT metric. The schematic in the middle illustrates a cross section of the wall composed of scar and surviving tissue. The red lines are extended from the scar surface in the direction of the normal vector to the scar surface. The calculated local thickness of the surviving tissue is mapped onto the scar surface and displayed in endocardial and epicardial views on the right panel (see Methods for detailed description).

Cardiac electrophysiology simulation and in-silico VT induction

The constructed models were employed in whole-heart arrhythmia simulations to study, in high resolution, the reentrant pathways and their relation to the detailed infarct structure. Electrical wave propagation was modeled by the monodomain formulation, and the simulations were performed using the software package CARP (CardioSolv LLC) on a parallel computing platform; numerical details of the finite-element simulations have been described in previous publications2931. Myocyte membrane kinetics were represented by the Luo-Rudy dynamic model32, a generic mammalian membrane model used in numerous studies of arrhythmia. Given the medium-to-low complexity of the LRd model, it is a reasonable trade-off in large-scale models such as the whole porcine heart. Scar tissue was modeled as an electrical insulator by removing the scar internal nodes from the mesh in the simulations. Additional details on the infarct modeling methodology are presented in the Supplementary Material. Monomorphic VTs were induced in all the hearts using a clinical S1-S2-S3 programmed electrical stimulation protocol31 that was applied from 27 pacing sites selected on the basis of a modified AHA segment designation in each heart (Figure 1B, see also Figure S1 in the Supplementary Materials). The large number of pacing locations (relative to a clinical protocol) ensures that we can capture a wide range of possible VT morphologies that could arise from a given infarct morphology, therefore fully exploring the relationship between VT pathways and infarct structure. Finally, pseudo-ECG waveforms were calculated for each VT episode from the difference of the extracellular potentials of two virtual electrodes each positioned 5 cm away from the left and the right base of the heart.

Quantification of the thickness of surviving tissue surrounding the scar

In all hearts, the infarcted sections of the wall were composed of a spatially complex interdigitation of (enhanced) scar and (non-enhanced) surviving tissue surrounding the scar. To characterize the structure of the surviving tissue surrounding the scar, we defined a novel scar-mapped local thickness (SMLT) metric. This metric was calculated for each point on the 3D surface of the scar as described below.

At each point on the 3D scar surface, a line was extended in the direction normal to the surface (Figure 1C, middle panel) until it intersected with another surface, either that of scar, or epi- or endocardium. The thickness metric was defined as the minimum of l and 2dmax, where l is the length of the normal line (shown in red) and dmax is the largest distance to the closest surface calculated at each tissue point along the red normal line. Finding dmax was needed to account for cases where the normal line is oblique to the surface it intersects, as l would overestimate the thickness (see also Supplementary Figure S2). Next, the 3D scar surface was color-coded at each point with the local value of the thickness metric (Figure 1C, right panel). As illustrated in the figure, the thickness of the surviving myocardium increases towards the edges of the scar (red color in the map). Such maps provide an efficient and systematic way to characterize the local thickness of the myocardium surrounding the patches of scar that would otherwise be difficult to detect and visualize due to the complex architecture. Additional detail on the calculation of the SMLT metric is presented in Supplementary Materials.

Analysis of reentry pathways

The sustained VTs (defined as lasting for at least 2 seconds after the last pacing stimulus) were analyzed to obtain information on VT morphology and cycle length (CL). To identify the 3D morphology of each VT pathway, we connected seed points along the fastest part of the 3D route of each VT as it completes one cycle, thus reducing the reentry, for analysis, to a simplified continuous “string” loop within the 3D ventricle. Within the confines of each loop there is only un-excited tissue, either scar, or excitable tissue in which propagation fails. The reentry path length is defined as the length of this string loop. Next, to characterize the local thickness of the tissue that contributes to reentry, each point along the pathway was assigned the SMLT metric value from the closest scar surface point. To do so, the points along each 3D pathway were first interpolated to obtain a consistent 100 μm distance between them. This enabled us to obtain a distribution of the surviving tissue thickness values along the reentry pathway.

Results

Characterization of surviving tissue surrounding the scar

All the hearts had anteroseptal infarcts with significant wall thinning at each region of infarct. One of the hearts exhibited an additional enhanced area in the lateral wall due to a second infarction (Heart 8). The extent of the infarct across the wall was variable but the scar was preferentially localized in the sub-endocardial half of the wall24. Regions of non-enhanced (viable) tissue interdigitated with scar patches were frequently observed, either adjacent to the scar sub-endocardially or sub-epicardially, or located intramurally traversing the scar. Three representative examples of viable tissue distribution are presented in Figure 2, as delineated in short-axis slices of high-resolution LGE-MRI. In Figure 2A, there is a thin layer of sub-endocardial surviving tissue of varying thickness. In Figure 2B, surviving tissue at the midwall provides a conductive pathway through the distributed scar. In Figure 2C, a region of viable myocardium is observed adjacent to the scar at the sub-epicardium, with a gradual decrease in its thickness from right to left.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Examples of the distribution of viable tissue in the zone of infarct, as visible from short-axis slices of high-resolution LGE-MRI in three infarcted hearts (5,7,8) (A) Thin sub-endocardial layer of surviving tissue (red arrows), (B) Intramural viable tissue (yellow arrows) (C) sub-epicardial layer of surviving myocardium (blue arrows).

Figure 3A presents the SMLT metric in all 8 hearts. These maps demonstrate the complex 3D anatomy of the scar with the color-coding revealing the spatial organization and the extent of surviving tissue surrounding scar patches. The lighter blue and green areas of the map indicate the presence of surviving tissue with thickness range of 0.5-3.0 mm overlaying the scar, while the darker blue regions represent thinner tissues (<0.5 mm) or indicate the absence of viable tissue on the endocardial or epicardial surfaces of the scar (i.e. if the scar extends all the way to the surface). As illustrated by these maps, the surviving tissue surrounding the scar has a complex spatial organization with variable thickness.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Visualization and characterization of surviving tissue surrounding the scar. (A) 3D geometries of 8 infarcted hearts with the scar surface color-coded with SMLT metric. The hearts are viewed from the posterolateral side such that the endocardial aspect of the infarct is visible. (B) Histograms of the occurrence of surviving tissue at different SMLT metric values, calculated in all the 8 hearts (left: normalized, and right: cumulative histograms).

Further, the SMLT metric values were aggregated over the scar surface of each heart; figure 3B presents the normalized cumulative histograms in the individual hearts as well as pooled data from all the hearts. These histograms illustrate the frequency of occurrence of surviving tissue with different thickness values at the zone of infarct. The median and [25th,75th] percentile values of the pooled thickness distribution were 1.1 mm and [0.6,2.1] mm, respectively.

VTs induced in ventricular models

In all the heart models, pacing-induced propagation through the infarct zones was heterogeneous, as illustrated by the complex isochrones in two of the heart models in Figure S3, Supplementary Materials. From a total of 216 attempts to induce reentry following the pacing protocol, 72 attempts led to sustained monomorphic VTs. Among those, 23 unique VT morphologies were identified (equivalent to 2.9 ± 1.8 morphologies per heart). The average VT CL was 190 ± 59 ms. This value is consistent with that of experimentally recorded VTs in porcine hearts33 (average values match within ± 5%). Eleven out of the 23 VT morphologies were induced from more than one pacing location. Detailed characteristics of the VTs are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Figures 4-6 present three examples of infarct-related VTs. Figure 4 illustrates a sub-endocardial VT in heart 6 (CL = 145 ms, see Supplementary Movie S1). The infarct spans the septum and the anterior wall (Figure 4A,B). The VT is depicted at different time points using transmembrane voltage maps (Figure 4C-E); the pseudo-ECG shows sustained VT following pacing (Figure 4F). As the voltage maps demonstrate, the reentrant circuit is primarily located on the endocardial side of the scar. The SMLT map in Figure 4B reveals the heterogeneity in the thickness of the surviving sub-endocardial tissue that creates tortuous pathways for the activation during reentry.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A representative VT sustained primarily within a heterogeneous layer of sub-endocardial viable tissue (CL = 145 ms) shown in an endocardial view of the septum in heart 6. (A) 3D geometry (scar: dark gray, myocardium: transparent white) (B) 3D geometry with the scar color-coded with the SMLT metric. (C-E) Transmembrane voltage maps demonstrating time snapshots of tortuous wave propagation in one cycle of reentry. White arrows show wave direction. The reentry is primarily located in the subendocardial layer of tissue. (F) Pseudo-ECG. tref : reference time.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

An example of a reentry in heart 7 as viewed from the epicardium (CL = 240 ms). (A) Transmembrane voltage maps present snapshots during one cycle of reentry with a breakthrough on the epicardium. (B) (left) View of 3D model geometry (scar: dark; myocardium: transparent gray), (right) delineation of a portion of an intramural surviving tissue embedded inside the infarct (green) that participates in the reentry. The arrows point to the locations of wave entrance and exit from the surviving tissue. (C) Pseudo-ECG. tref is the reference time in which the voltage maps in (A) are shown with reference to.

Figure 5 presents a sub-epicardial reentry in heart 5 (CL = 230 ms, see Supplementary Movie S2). In this case, the reentry encompasses propagation through a tube-like structure of viable tissue that runs inside the infarct sub-epicardially. The channel has an irregular zig-zag shape with total length of about 30 mm (Figure 5D). The total activation time inside the channel is ~ 120 ms. This channel contributed to one sustained VT (Figure 5E) and 8 unsustained reentries induced from multiple pacing sites.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Reentry involving a sub-epicardial channel of viable tissue in heart 5 (CL = 230 ms). (A-D) Transmembrane voltage maps showing one cycle of reentry. The wave traverses the channel in (B) and (C); its exit from the channel is followed by a centrifugal activation of the tissue outside the scar in (D). The length of the epicardial channel is approximately 30 mm and the VT pathlength is 74 mm. A border layer around the scar has been rendered semi-transparent to visualize channel position. (E) Pseudo-ECG. tref : reference time.

In addition to the VT circuits in which the reentry pathway is contained within the tissue on one side of the scar (either sub-epicardially or sub-endocardially), as demonstrated in the previous figures, some VTs involved propagation that traversed the scar transmurally and made breakthroughs at the epicardial or endocardial surface. An example of such reentry is presented in Figure 6A (CL = 240 ms, see Supplementary Movie S3). The activation wavefront travels transmurally through a region of surviving tissue in the infarct zone (green in Figure 6B) and makes a breakthrough on the epicardium. This reentry morphology was inducible from 11 pacing locations in this heart. Another example of a transmural VT with breakthroughs both on endo- and epicardium is presented as Supplementary Figure S3.

As presented in Supplementary Tables S1, the majority of the VT pathways were completely or partially sub-endocardial (52% and 78% respectively), while 26% of the simulated VTs traversed the scar transmurally with breakthroughs at the epicardium and the endocardium. Finally, 22% of the pathways were located entirely at the epicardial side of the scar.

Characterization of VT pathways and the contributing surviving tissue

The average path length for the 23 VT morphologies was 53 ± 14 mm. Figures 7A and 7C present all the VT pathways in hearts 5 and 6. For each heart, the corresponding distribution of the SMLT metric is presented in Figures 7B and 7D. In these plots, the blue histograms represent the frequencies of occurrence of a given thickness value over the entire 3D scar surface in each heart, while the red histograms represent these frequencies for the subset of points belonging to VT pathways.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Analysis of the surviving tissue along the VT pathways. (A,C) Maps of SMLT in two hearts with the 3D VT pathway loops in each case (myocardium: transparent gray). (B,D) Histograms of frequency of occurrence of a given SMLT value over the entire 3D scar surface (blue) and along the VT pathways (red) in each heart. (E) The same histograms as (B) and (D) but aggregated for all the hearts and VTs in this study. Shown are normalized (left) and cumulative (right) histograms.

Further, in Figure 7E, aggregated normalized and cumulative histograms of SMLT are presented for all the 23 VTs in the eight hearts in the study (red). Similarly, in the same figure, SMLT histograms for the entire 3D scar surface in all hearts is plotted in blue. Despite similarities in the shape of the distributions, the red histogram is preferentially localized toward smaller tissue thickness. As the figure demonstrates, a major portion of the VT pathways (90%) is through viable tissue of thickness less than 2.2 mm. The median and the [25th,75th] percentile values of the distribution were 0.94 mm and [0.6,1.3] mm respectively, with approximately 7% of the pathways points located in regions with thickness equal or less than 0.25 mm.

Discussion

The goal of this study was to explore the relationship between the complex 3D structure of the healed infarct and the 3D VT pathways in high-resolution models of infarcted porcine hearts. To do so, structurally-detailed models of infarcted ventricles were reconstructed from previously acquired24 ex vivo LGE and DT MRI data of eight chronically infarcted porcine hearts at a voxel size more than 400-fold smaller than clinical LGE-MRI. A scar-mapped metric, SMLT, was defined that provided a novel means to quantify the structure of the surviving tissue surrounding the scar. This method revealed the heterogeneous spatial organization of surviving tissue within the infarct, and enabled us to systematically characterize the thickness distribution of surviving tissue in the infarct volumes of eight hearts. Constructing high-resolution ventricular models from the imaging data, we were able to simulate and analyze the VT pathways that are established for each of the complex infarct morphologies. The results demonstrated that the VT pathways are established through surviving tissues (whether channels or layers) with varying thickness. It also showed the involvement of sub-endocardial tissue in 78% of VT pathways. Importantly, the analysis revealed that VT pathways are preferentially established within surviving tissue structures of thickness of 0.25 to 1.75 mm, with the majority of the pathway portions traversing thin tissues of ≤ 2.2 mm (90th percentile) surrounding the scar.

Identification and characterization of viable tissue surrounding the scar

A major contribution of this study is the characterization of the 3D architecture of viable myocardium surrounding the scar in intact hearts. The presence of surviving myocardial fibers in the healed infarct has been previously shown by means of sectioning the heart5,34. In agreement with these studies, we found complex regions of viable tissue embedded in the infarct; these regions surrounded the scar at the sub-endocardium or sub-epicardium and/or penetrated the scar intramurally. Efficient visualization and quantification of the thickness of such surviving regions is challenging due to their irregular 3D shape. The novel SMLT maps introduced here provide a systematic way to identify and characterize the dimension of these structures. Using the thickness maps, we identified diverse morphologies of viable tissue surrounding the scar including: tube-like channels within sub-epicardial layer, small regions of viable tissue inside the scar connecting the endo- and epicardium and sheets of surviving myocardium at the sub-epicardium or sub-endocardium with varying thickness throughout the infarct. Aggregation of the SMLT values over the surface of all scar patches in each heart and in all hearts combined allowed us to construct, for the first time, distribution plots that revealed the frequency which each surviving-tissue thickness value occurs in these infarcts.

The link between viable tissue structure surrounding the scar and VT pathways

Previous experimental studies have suggested that the viable myocardium surrounding the scar plays a role in ventricular arrhythmias33,34. However, in those studies, VTs were mapped at low resolution and mapping was limited to the endocardial and/or epicardial surfaces, thus the 3D patterns of the VTs within the 3D infarct structure could not be explored. In this study, using image-based simulations, we examined and visualized VT morphologies in three dimensions and correlated the VT pathways to the 3D surviving tissue structure in high resolution. The aggregated histograms for the thickness of the surviving tissue constructed using the SMLT metric, one representing the total amount of surviving tissue surrounding the scar (Figure 7E, blue), and the other representing only surviving tissue part of the VT pathways (Figure 7E, red), show important differences. The red histogram is preferentially located toward smaller thickness (90th percentile of 2.2 mm for the red vs. 90th percentile of 4.5 mm for the blue) suggesting that thinner surviving tissues, whether channels or layers, are more likely to participate in VT pathways. Examining the results of our simulations demonstrated that conduction block was more likely to occur at the exit of thinner tissue layers and channels, where source/sink mismatch is most likely to occur, and hence the subsequent reentries formed after propagation traversed the site of original block. Such behavior is consistent with previous experimental results35.

This study also found that the majority (78%) of the VT pathways were (partially or fully) contained in the sub-endocardial tissue. Such surviving tissue, likely the result of the diffusion of oxygen from the ventricular cavity, has been previously found to provide conducting pathways for reentry36,37. Our simulation results showed that the VT pathways could be established primarily contained within the endocardial side of the scar, i.e. the layer of sub-endocardial tissue surrounding the scar. We further demonstrated that the heterogeneous thickness of the sub-endocardial layer (as revealed by SMLT maps) could create regional heterogeneity in the wave propagation velocity both under pacing activation (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials) and during arrhythmia (Figure 4). This provides additional evidence on the importance of the role of local complex infarct structure on the activation properties and propensity for arrhythmia38,39.

Implications for clinical MRI and VT substrate detection

The findings from this study could help bridge the gap between the structure and VT pathways at the sub-millimeter scale, and the corresponding clinical-MRI and clinical-resolution VT recordings. The SMLT histograms here demonstrate the presence of a significant amount of thin surviving tissue structures surrounding the scar that are otherwise considered “sub-voxel” in a lower resolution clinical LGE-MRI. For example, more than 70% of the viable tissue surrounding the scar had thickness of less than 2 mm – such structures would not be directly resolved by imaging with the larger voxel dimensions used in clinical MRI. Importantly, VT pathways were preferentially localized within such structures, suggesting that clinical LGE-MRI techniques needs to achieve resolution significantly higher than 2 mm to accurately resolve surviving tissue in the zone of infarct that is part of the VT pathways.

Furthermore, simulations constructed from clinical imaging data are being used to stratify myocardial infarction patients for risk of sudden cardiac death31 and to potentially guide ablation procedures40. The high-resolution models reconstructed from ex vivo data could help further investigate the effect of image resolution on the VT pathways in patient-specific models. This can be done, for example, by retrospective down-sampling the high-resolution images to lower resolution images and simulate and compare VTs in the models constructed at different resolutions27. Such analysis could therefore provide a means to improve the accuracy of the patient-specific models from clinical MRI for the prediction of VT pathways.

Current clinical electrophysiology (EP) practice frequently aims to identify “channels” in the scar, with the notion that terminating propagation through those by ablating tissue will interrupt VT4145. This study showed that the critical parts of VT reentrant circuit (i.e. the VT pathways, as identified here) do not involve all surviving tissue; rather VT pathways are established mostly through surviving tissues of preferential thickness. Thus, as the results obtained here suggest, even if channels are identified through the scar on the endocardial surface during a clinical EP procedure, these may be passive conduits of propagation during VT rather than critical pathways, and thus not appropriate targets for ablation. Further research will be needed to establish improved strategies for detecting critical VT substrates in cardiac ablation therapy.

Conclusions

In this study, we used a combination of high-resolution (0.25×0.25×0.5 mm3) imaging data and ventricular simulations to systematically and non-destructively characterize the 3D structure of viable tissue in the zone of infarct and explore its role in VT maintenance. Our results from eight hearts revealed the presence of complex surviving tissue with a thickness of primarily less than 2 mm in the zone of infarct that provided conducting pathways for VTs. The new knowledge obtained in this study contributes toward a better understanding of infarct-related VTs, and could help toward an improved identification of VT substrates.

Study limitations

The reperfused infarction in porcine, the scans of which were used for model construction, represents the clinical setting in which a coronary occlusion is followed by revascularization, therefore it may not represent accurately the surviving tissue distribution in the zone of infarct in the human population.

In addition, the spatial resolution of the imaging did not allow for accurately resolving viable tissues structures with dimension of less than 0.25 mm. Despite that, our results showed that majority of VT pathways were located within surviving tissue of thickness that was above 0.25 mm. Indeed only 7% of the length of the VT pathways was through surviving tissue of thickness equal or less than 0.25 mm. Finally, the Purkinje system is not represented as it cannot be reconstructed from the ex vivo scans – currently the MRI resolution/contrast does not allow imaging such structures. Future studies are needed to explore the additional role that such system may play in infarct-related VTs.

Supplementary Material

006131 - Supplemental Material
006131_graphic abstract
Movie 1
Download video file (2.8MB, mov)
Movie 2
Download video file (2.3MB, mov)
Movie 3
Download video file (2.3MB, mov)

WHAT IS KNOWN

  • Surviving myocardium in the zone of infarct plays an important role in infarct-related ventricular tachycardias (VT) by providing conduction pathways for reentry.

  • Knowledge of the spatial organization of scar and surviving tissue and its contribution to infarct-related VT is paramount to designing optimal treatments for VT.

WHAT THE STUDY ADDS

  • Using ex vivo high-resolution (sub-millimeter) LGE-MRI scans and a new scar-mapped local thickness metric, the study revealed the complex distribution of surviving tissue within the infarct in porcine hearts, and provided systematic quantification of the thickness of surviving tissue in these hearts in a non-destructive way.

  • Simulations with the high-resolution models reconstructed from the MRI scans demonstrated that 3D VT pathways were established through surviving tissues (whether channels or layers) with varying thickness, with the involvement of sub-endocardial tissue in the majority of the VTs. The VT pathways were preferentially localized within surviving tissue structures with smaller thickness (90th percentile of <2.2 mm)

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding: The authors acknowledge support by the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award to NT (DP1HL123271) and the support by a grant from the Fondation Leducq.

Footnotes

Disclosures: NT is a cofounder of CardioSolv, LLC and EM is a cofounder and shareholder of MR Interventions Inc. CardioSolv and MR Interventions were not involved in this research.

References

  • 1.John RM, Tedrow UB, Koplan BA, Albert CM, Epstein LM, Sweeney MO, Miller AL, Michaud GF, Stevenson WG. Ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Lancet. 2012;380:1520–1529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61413-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Janse MJ, Wit AL. Electrophysiological mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Physiol Rev. 1989;69:1049–1169. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1989.69.4.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kléber AG, Rudy Y. Basic Mechanisms of Cardiac Impulse Propagation and Associated Arrhythmias. Physiol Rev. 2009;84:431–488. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Josephson ME. Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology: Techniques and Interpretations. Fourth. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 446–642. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Tasseron S, Vermeulen JT, de Jonge N, Lahpor JR. Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. “Zigzag” course of activation. Circulation. 1993;88:915–926. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.3.915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rutherford SL, Trew ML, Sands GB, Legrice IJ, Smaill BH. High-resolution 3-dimensional reconstruction of the infarct border zone impact of structural remodeling on electrical activation. Circ Res. 2012;111:301–311. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.260943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Connolly AJ, Bishop MJ. Computational Representations of Myocardial Infarct Scars and Implications for Arrhythmogenesis. Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2016;10:27. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S39708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ciaccio EJ, Ashikaga H, Kaba RA, Cervantes D, Hopenfeld B, Wit AL, Peters NS, McVeigh ER, Garan H, Coromilas J. Model of reentrant ventricular tachycardia based on infarct border zone geometry predicts reentrant circuit features as determined by activation mapping. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:1034–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Smaill BH, Zhao J, Trew ML. Three-dimensional impulse propagation in myocardium: arrhythmogenic mechanisms at the tissue level. Circ Res. 2013;112:834–848. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Connolly A, Trew ML, Smaill BH, Plank G, Bishop MJ. Local Gradients in Electrotonic Loading Modulate the Local Effective Refractory Period: Implications for Arrhythmogenesis in the Infarct Border Zone. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:2251–2259. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2421296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kellman P, Arai AE. Cardiac imaging techniques for physicians: late enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36:529–542. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Perez-David E, Arenal Á, Rubio-Guivernau JL, Del Castillo R, Atea L, Arbelo E, Caballero E, Celorrio V, Datino T, Gonzalez-Torrecilla E. Noninvasive identification of ventricular tachycardia-related conducting channels using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic myocardial infarction: comparison of signal intensity scar mapping and endocardial voltage mappin. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:184–194. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andreu D, Berruezo A, Ortiz-Pérez JT, Silva E, Mont L, Borràs R, De Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Fernández-Armenta J, Zeljko H, Brugada J. Integration of 3D electroanatomic maps and magnetic resonance scar characterization into the navigation system to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2011;4:674–683. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.961946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernández-Armenta J, Berruezo A, Andreu D, Camara O, Silva E, Serra L, Barbarito V, Carotenutto L, Evertz R, Ortiz-Pérez JT, De Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Sitges M, Mont L, Frangi A, Brugada J. Three-dimensional architecture of scar and conducting channels based on high resolution ce-CMR: insights for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:528–537. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andreu D, Ortiz-Pérez JT, Fernández-Armenta J, Guiu E, Acosta J, Prat-González S, De Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Garrido C, Mont L, Brugada J, Berruezo A. 3D delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance sequences improve conducting channel delineation prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace. 2015;17:938–945. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Estner HL, Zviman MM, Herzka D, Miller F, Castro V, Nazarian S, Ashikaga H, Dori Y, Berger RD, Calkins H, Lardo AC, Halperin HR. The critical isthmus sites of ischemic ventricular tachycardia are in zones of tissue heterogeneity, visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1942–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Piers SRD, Tao Q, De Riva Silva M, Siebelink HM, Schalij MJ, Van Der Geest RJ, Zeppenfeld K. CMR-based identification of critical isthmus sites of ischemic and nonischemic ventricular tachycardia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:774–784. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hennig A, Salel M, Sacher F, Camaioni C, Sridi S, Denis A, Montaudon M, Laurent F, Jais P, Cochet H. High-resolution three-dimensional late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to identify the underlying substrate of ventricular arrhythmia. EP Eur. 2017:1–13. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, Gupta SN, Bluemke DA, Foo TK, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG, Marbán E, Tomaselli GF, Lima JAC, Wu KC, David A. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2007;115:2006–2014. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Roes SD, Borleffs CJW, Van Der Geest RJ, Westenberg JJM, Marsan NA, Kaandorp TAM, Reiber JHC, Zeppenfeld K, Lamb HJ, De Roos A, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. Infarct tissue heterogeneity assessed with contrast-enhanced mri predicts spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:183–190. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.826529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yan AT, Shayne AJ, Brown KA, Gupta SN, Chan CW, Luu TM, Di Carli MF, Reynolds HG, Stevenson WG, Kwong RY, Chan W, Di Carli MF, William G. Characterization of the peri-infarct zone by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a powerful predictor of post-myocardial infarction mortality. Circulation. 2006;114:32–39. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pashakhanloo F, Herzka DA, Ashikaga H, Mori S, Gai N, Bluemke DA, Trayanova NA, McVeigh ER. Myofiber Architecture of the Human Atria as Revealed by Submillimeter Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e004133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Helm PA, Younes L, Beg MF, Ennis DB, Leclercq C, Faris OP, McVeigh E, Kass D, Miller MI, Winslow RL. Evidence of structural remodeling in the dyssynchronous failing heart. Circ Res. 2006;98:125–132. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000199396.30688.eb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pashakhanloo F, Herzka DA, Mori S, Zviman M, Halperin H, Gai N, Bluemke DA, Trayanova NA, Mcveigh ER. Submillimeter diffusion tensor imaging and late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of chronic myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017:1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12968-016-0317-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vadakkumpadan F, Arevalo H, Prassl A, Chen J, Kickinger F, Kohl P, Plank G, Trayanova N. Image-based models of cardiac structure in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2010;2:489–506. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Arevalo H, Plank G, Helm P, Halperin H, Trayanova N. Tachycardia in post-infarction hearts: insights from 3D image-based ventricular models. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deng D, Arevalo H, Pashakhanloo F, Prakosa A, Ashikaga H, McVeigh E, Halperin H, Trayanova N. Accuracy of prediction of infarct-related arrhythmic circuits from image-based models reconstructed from low and high resolution MRI. Front Physiol. 2015;6:1–12. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2015.00282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pop M, Sermesant M, Mansi T, Crystal E, Ghate S, Peyrat J-M, Lashevsky I, Qiang B, McVeigh E, Ayache N, Wright GA. Correspondence between simple 3-D MRI-based computer models and in-vivo EP measurements in swine with chronic infarctions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:3483–3486. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2168395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Plank G, Zhou L, Greenstein JL, Cortassa S, Winslow RL, O’Rourke B, Trayanova NA. From mitochondrial ion channels to arrhythmias in the heart: computational techniques to bridge the spatio-temporal scales. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008;366:3381–3409. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vigmond EJ, Aguel F, Trayanova NA. Computational techniques for solving the bidomain equations in three dimensions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49:1260–1269. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2002.804597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Arevalo HJ, Vadakkumpadan F, Guallar E, Jebb A, Malamas P, Wu KC, Trayanova NA. Arrhythmia risk stratification of patients after myocardial infarction using personalized heart models. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11437. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ching-Hsing L, Rudy Y. A Dynamic Model of the Cardiac Ventricular Action Potential Simulations of Ionic Currents and Concentration Changes. Circulation. 1994;74:1071–1098. doi: 10.1161/01.res.74.6.1071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ashikaga H, Sasano T, Dong J, Zviman MM, Evers R, Hopenfeld B, Castro V, Helm RH, Dickfeld T, Nazarian S, Donahue JK, Berger RD, Calkins H, Abraham MR, Marbán E, Lardo AC, McVeigh ER, Halperin HR. Magnetic resonance-based anatomical analysis of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: Implications for catheter ablation. Circ Res. 2007;101:939–947. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.158980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, Wilde AA, Coronel R, Becker AE, Dingemans KP, van Hemel NM, Hauer RN. Reentry as a cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: electrophysiologic and anatomic correlation. Circulation. 1988;77:589–606. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.3.589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ciaccio EJ, Coromilas J, Wit AL, Peters NS, Garan H. Source-Sink Mismatch Causing Functional Conduction Block in Re-Entrant Ventricular Tachycardia. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;4:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fenoglio JJ, Pham TD, Harken a H, Horowitz LN, Josephson ME, Wita L. Recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia: structure and ultrastructure of subendocardial regions in which tachycardia originates. Circulation. 1983;68:518–533. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.68.3.518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tschabrunn CM, Roujol S, Nezafat R, Faulkner-Jones B, Buxton AE, Josephson ME, Anter E. A swine model of infarct-related reentrant ventricular tachycardia: Electroanatomic, magnetic resonance, and histopathological characterization. Hear Rhythm. 2015;13:262–273. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ciaccio EJ, Coromilas J, Ashikaga H, Cervantes DO, Wit AL, Peters NS, McVeigh ER, Garan H. Model of unidirectional block formation leading to reentrant ventricular tachycardia in the infarct border zone of postinfarction canine hearts. Comput Biol Med. 2015;62:254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.04.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Engelman ZJ, Trew ML, Smaill BH. Structural Heterogeneity Alone Is a Sufficient Substrate for Dynamic Instability and Altered Restitution. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2010;3:195–203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.890459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Trayanova NA, Pashakhanloo F, Wu KC, Halperin HR. Imaging-Based Simulations for Predicting Sudden Death and Guiding Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation. 2017:1–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.004743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Calkins H, Epstein A, Packer D, Arria A, Hummel J, Gilligan D, Trusso J, Carlson M, Luceri R, Kopelman H, Wilber D, Wharton JM, Stevenson W. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy: Results of a prospective multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1905–1914. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00615-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Stevenson W, Friedman P, Kocovic D, Sager P, Saxon L, Pavri B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;98:308–314. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.4.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tung R, Josephson ME, Reddy V, Reynolds MR. Influence of Clinical and Procedural Predictors on Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes: An Analysis From the Substrate Mapping and Ablation in Sinus Rhythm to Halt Ventricular Tachycardia Trial (SMASH‐VT) J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:799–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01705.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Andreu D, Penela D, Acosta J, Perea RJ, Soto-iglesias D, De Caralt TM, Ortiz-perez JT, Prat-gonz S, Mont L, Berruezo A. Cardiac magnetic resonance – aided scar dechanneling : Influence on acute and long-term outcomes. 2017:13–15. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hutchinson MD, Garza HK. Contemporary Tools and Techniques for Substrate Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Structural Heart Disease. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20:16. doi: 10.1007/s11936-018-0610-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

006131 - Supplemental Material
006131_graphic abstract
Movie 1
Download video file (2.8MB, mov)
Movie 2
Download video file (2.3MB, mov)
Movie 3
Download video file (2.3MB, mov)

RESOURCES