In this issue of the CUAJ, Nayak et al1 retrospectively analyzed urinary function outcomes of 158 patients who received orthotopic neobladder urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer at The Ottawa Hospital between 2006 and 2014. The authors found that significant daytime and nighttime urinary incontinence [UI] was common in the early postoperative period, but improved over the first postoperative year. Specifically, the rates of significant daytime and nighttime UI at one year were 8.6% and 20%, respectively.
The authors are to be congratulated for this timely analysis, as this study adds to the growing evidence base supporting excellent urinary function outcomes following orthotopic bladder substitution in bladder cancer patients. For example, in an analysis of 188 orthotopic neobladder patients who completed validated questionnaires from the University of Southern California, the investigators reported a 12-month daytime urinary continence rate of 92% and 12-month nighttime urinary continence rate of approximately 50%.2 Similarly, in a pooled analysis of 2238 patients who received orthotopic bladder substitution, 13% reported daytime UI, whereas 50% endorsed nighttime UI.3
Despite these encouraging functional data, enthusiasm for orthotopic bladder substitution in bladder cancer must be tempered by the dearth of high-quality evidence available to support its superiority over other types of urinary diversion.4 Existing data are limited by use of non-validated questionnaires, varying definitions of UI, and differing data collection techniques.4 Confirmation of the efficacy and superiority of orthotopic bladder substitution will require well-designed, prospective studies using validated patient-reported outcome data. The Canadian Bladder Cancer Information System (CBCIS) project is currently prospectively collecting data that may serve to enhance this evidence base. At present, however, optimization of orthotopic neobladder use and compliance with consensus guideline-recommended care5 may be best achieved through centralization to multidisciplinary bladder cancer teams.
Footnotes
Competing interests: Dr. Fairey has been a speaker for J&J and Roche. Dr. McLarty reports no competing personal or financial interests related to this work.
See related article on page 181
References
- 1.Nayak AL, Cagiannos I, Lavallee LT, et al. Urinary function following radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4877. Epub ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clifford TG, Shah SH, Bazargani ST, et al. Prospective evaluation of continence following radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary diversion using a validated questionnaire. J Urol. 2016;196:1685–91. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Steers WD. Voiding dysfunction in the orthotopic neobladder. World J Urol. 2000;18:330–7. doi: 10.1007/s003450000146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003450000146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Daneshmand S. Orthotopic urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol. 2015;25:545–9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Milowsky MI, Rumble RB, Booth CM, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1945–53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9797. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.9797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
