Abstract
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss, yet much of the genetic risk remains unaccounted for, especially in African-Americans who have a higher risk for developing POAG. We conduct a multiethnic genome-wide association study (GWAS) of POAG in the GERA cohort, with replication in the UK Biobank (UKB), and vice versa, GWAS in UKB with replication in GERA. We identify 24 loci (P < 5.0 × 10−8), including 14 novel, of which 9 replicate (near FMNL2, PDE7B, TMTC2, IKZF2, CADM2, DGKG, ANKH, EXOC2, and LMX1B). Functional studies support intraocular pressure-related influences of FMNL2 and LMX1B, with certain Lmx1b mutations causing high IOP and glaucoma resembling POAG in mice. The newly identified loci increase the proportion of variance explained in each GERA race/ethnicity group, with the largest gain in African-Americans (0.5–3.1%). A meta-analysis combining GERA and UKB identifies 24 additional loci. Our study provides important insights into glaucoma pathogenesis.
Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) leads to progressive vision loss. Here, Choquet et al. perform genome-wide association analysis for POAG in a multi-ethnic cohort, identify a total of nine novel genetic loci and show relevant function of FMNL2 and LMX1B using cell line and mouse experiments.
Introduction
Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors and is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide1. It is a heterogenous group of diseases, unified by a loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and the degeneration of their axons in the optic nerve, leading to associated visual field defects. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of glaucoma2 and is often associated with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), although up to one-third of POAG patients have IOP levels in the normal range3. In addition to high IOP, major risk factors for POAG include advancing age, myopia, race/ethnicity, and positive family history2,4.
Characterizing the genetic factors influencing an individual’s susceptibility to POAG is an important step toward understanding its etiology. A twin study, published in 1987, estimated the heritability of POAG at 0.135. More recently, two studies based on genome-wide array data of unrelated individuals estimated the additive heritability of POAG to range from 24 to 42%, but with inconsistent results between the two studies6,7. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have reported 17 loci associated with POAG at genome-wide significance, and an additional 2 loci at a suggestive level of significance (P < 10−6)8–18. Together these loci explain only a small proportion of the genetic contribution to POAG risk, and although most of the reported associations have been validated in an independent study, only a few have been investigated in functional studies (e.g., CDKN2B-AS, SIX6, and CAV1/2)19–22. There is also a lack of studies investigating genetic risk factors influencing POAG susceptibility in African ancestry populations and Hispanic/Latino individuals, with only one GWAS published to date14. This is a particularly important gap in our understanding of glaucoma etiology, because of the higher prevalence of POAG in these populations (https://nei.nih.gov/health/glaucoma/glaucoma_facts).
To address these gaps, we undertake a GWAS of POAG and an analysis of genetic ancestry in the large and ethnically diverse Genetic Epidemiology Research in Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort, consisting of 4 986 POAG cases and 58 426 controls from four race/ethnicity groups (non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic/Latinos, East Asians, and African-Americans). We test novel loci discovered in the current study in an independent external replication cohort: the multiethnic UK Biobank (UKB)23, which includes 7 329 glaucoma cases (subtype unspecified) and 169 561 controls. Conversely, we then investigate novel glaucoma-associated loci from the UKB in GERA, and conduct a multiethnic meta-analysis combining GERA and UKB. We also examine the effect of newly and previously identified POAG loci on the ancestry effects observed in GERA. In addition to undertaking in silico analyses of associated loci, we examine changes in the expression of candidate genes in RGCs and optic nerve head tissue isolated from a mouse model of glaucoma as a mean of identifying genes that potentially contribute to glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Next, we perform functional characterization of FMNL2 and LMX1B, two of our novel associated loci. First, employing an small interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated gene silencing of FMNL2, we determine a role for FMNL2 in supporting the function of human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells, a critical cell type involved in the regulation of IOP. Second, utilizing mutant mouse strains, we demonstrate support for a role of LMX1B in the pathogenesis of ocular hypertension (OHTN) and glaucoma in the general population. The current study identifies a total of nine novel loci associated with the risk of POAG or glaucoma at genome-wide significance that replicated in an independent sample, and demonstrates relevant function of FMNL2 and LMX1B using cell line and mouse experiments.
Results
GERA cohort
We conducted the primary discovery analysis in 4 986 POAG cases and 58 426 controls from 4 race/ethnicity groups (non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic/Latinos, East Asians, and African-Americans) in GERA (Table 1). Among GERA subjects, cases were more likely to be older and male. We also observed a much higher prevalence of POAG among African-Americans compared to non-Hispanic whites (16.1% vs. 7.4%), along with a less-pronounced higher prevalence in East Asians (9.9%) and Hispanic/Latinos (7.9%)
Table 1.
Controls | Cases | ||
---|---|---|---|
Total | N (proportion that are cases) | 58 426 | 4 986 (7.9%) |
Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 69.7 ± 13.0 | 79.6 ± 9.4 |
Sex | Women - N (proportion that are cases) | 35 193 | 2 689 (7.1%) |
Men - N (proportion that are cases) | 23 233 | 2 297 (9.0%) | |
NTG cases | N | — | 743 |
Controls with an OHTN diagnosis | N | 881 | — |
Median IOP | Mean ± SD | 14.9 ± 2.6 | 15.5 ± 2.9 |
Non-Hispanic white | N (proportion that are cases) | 48 065 | 3 836 (7.4%) |
Age (years), mean ± SD | 70.7 ± 12.5 | 80.5 ± 9.0 | |
Sex, number of women/men | 28 798/19 266 | 2 115/1 721 | |
Hispanic/Latino | N (proportion that are cases) | 4 778 | 411 (7.9%) |
Age (years) Mean ± SD | 65.0 ± 14.4 | 75.5 ± 10.1 | |
Sex, number of Women / Men | 2 965/1 813 | 218/193 | |
East Asian | N (proportion that are cases) | 4 034 | 441 (9.9%) |
Age (years), mean ± SD | 64.6 ± 14.4 | 76.6 ± 10.0 | |
Sex, number of women/men | 2 453/1 581 | 202/239 | |
African-American | N (proportion that are cases) | 1 549 | 298 (16.1%) |
Age (years), mean ± SD | 66.7 ± 13.3 | 77.7 ± 9.3 | |
Sex, number of women/men | 976/573 | 154/144 |
N number, SD standard deviation, POAG primary open-angle glaucoma, NTG normal tension glaucoma, OHTN ocular hypertension, defined as participants who had a diagnosis of ocular hypertension but have no diagnosis of any type of glaucoma, IOP intraocular pressure, Age age at last vision exam
Because of the observed variation in POAG prevalence, we examined POAG prevalence in the context of genetic ancestry within each of the four race/ethnicity groups (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). In the African-American group, we observed a significant association (P = 0.01) between increasing POAG risk and greater African (compared to European) ancestry (PC1). In the East Asian group, we observed a greater risk of POAG with northern (vs. southern) East Asian ancestry (P = 7.3 × 10−8) (PC2). In the Hispanic/Latino group, we observed higher risk of POAG with greater Native American (vs. European) ancestry (P = 6.3 × 10−8) (PC1).
Glaucoma loci in GERA
In our discovery GWAS analysis, we identified 12 independent genome-wide significant (P < 5 × 10−8) loci associated with POAG in the multiethnic meta-analysis (λ = 1.056 and λ1000 = 1.006, which is reasonable for a sample of this size under the assumption of polygenic inheritance24) (Table 2, and Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 2). Of the 12 loci, 5 were novel (41.7%), including rs56117902 in FMNL2 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.88, P = 1.0 × 10−8), rs9494457 in PDE7B (OR = 1.16, P = 3.0 × 10−11), rs149154973 near ELN (OR = 0.70, P = 3.9 × 10−9), rs324794 near TMTC2 (OR = 0.87, P = 6.1 × 10−10), and rs2593221 in TCF12 (OR = 0.86, P = 8.5 × 10−10) (Supplementary Figure 3). We also examined the association of the lead single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the 12 genome-wide significant loci with POAG in each individual race/ethnicity group (Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Figure 1). In African-Americans, SNPs rs56117902 at FMNL2 and rs149154973 near ELN were both nominally associated with POAG (P = 0.017 and 0.047 for rs56117902 and rs149154973, respectively). In Hispanic/Latinos, we found a suggestive association between PDE7B rs9494457 and POAG risk (P = 0.005). In East Asians, we detected a nominal association of POAG with TCF12 rs2593221 (P = 0.019). Except for rs149154973 near ELN, all SNPs at novel loci showed consistent direction of effects across all race/ethnicity groups, and no significant heterogeneity was observed between race/ethnicity groups.
Table 2.
SNP | Chr | Pos | Locus | Alleles | GERA discovery cohort | UKB replication cohort | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | |||||
rs7524755 | 1 | 165694897 | TMCO1 | T/C | 1.35 (1.27–1.44) | 1.6 × 10−21 | 1.37 (1.31–1.43) | 8.3 × 10−41 |
rs56117902 | 2 | 153304730 | FMNL2 | A/C | 0.88 (0.84–0.92) | 1.0 × 10−8 | 0.93 (0.90–0.97) | 7.3 × 10−5 |
rs59521811 | 4 | 7909772 | AFAP1 | T/C | 0.86 (0.82–0.90) | 1.2 × 10−11 | 0.86 (0.83–0.89) | 9.8 × 10−17 |
rs6913530 | 6 | 36598209 | near CDKN1A | G/A | 0.86 (0.82–0.90) | 2.3 × 10−9 | 0.98 (0.95–1.02) | 0.44 |
rs9494457 | 6 | 136474794 | PDE7B | T/A | 1.16 (1.11–1.22) | 3.0 × 10−11 | 1.08 (1.05–1.12) | 7.4 × 10−6 |
rs149154973 | 7 | 73322211 | near ELN | TG/T | 0.70 (0.62–0.79) | 3.9 × 10−9 | NA | NA |
rs10811645 | 9 | 22049656 | CDKN2B-AS1 | G/A | 0.77 (0.74–0.80) | 2.8 × 10−32 | 0.86 (0.83–0.89) | 1.0 × 10−18 |
rs2472493 | 9 | 107695848 | near ABCA1 | G/A | 1.17 (1.12–1.22) | 1.2 × 10−13 | 1.15 (1.12–1.19) | 6.3 × 10−17 |
rs324794 | 12 | 83946450 | near TMTC2 | G/T | 0.87 (0.83–0.91) | 6.1 × 10−10 | 0.95 (0.92–0.99) | 6.8 × 10−3 |
rs35155027 | 14 | 61095174 | SIX1/SIX6 | G/C | 1.17 (1.12–1.23) | 1.1 × 10−12 | 1.13 (1.10–1.17) | 6.2 × 10−13 |
rs2593221 | 15 | 57501414 | TCF12 | A/G | 0.86 (0.82–0.90) | 8.5 × 10−10 | 0.96 (0.92–0.99) | 0.025 |
rs9913911 | 17 | 10031183 | GAS7 | A/G | 1.22 (1.17–1.28) | 1.5 × 10−18 | 1.17 (1.13–1.21) | 2.2 × 10−17 |
P-values in bold achieved genome-wide level of significance (P < 5 × 10−8); loci that are underlined are novel
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, Chr chromosome, Pos position, OR odds ratio, NA not available
Replication in an independent external cohort
We then tested the five lead SNPs representing each of the five novel loci for replication in an independent, external meta-analysis in the multiethnic UKB23, which includes 7 329 glaucoma cases and 169 561 controls from five race/ethnicity groups (European, East Asian, South Asian, African British, and mixed ancestries) (Supplementary Table 3). Three SNPs, including rs56117902 at FMNL2, rs9494457 at PDE7B, and rs324794 near TMTC2, replicated at Bonferroni significance (P = 7.9 × 10−5, 7.2 × 10−6, and 6.8 × 10−3, respectively) with the same direction of effect between the discovery association and replication sample (Table 2). In addition, rs2593221 near TCF12 was associated at a nominal level (P = 0.025). No data were available in UKB to test SNP rs149154973 for replication.
Conditional and epistasis analyses
We next searched for additional genome-wide significant SNPs within a 2 Mb window of the 12 lead SNPs (±1.0 Mb with respect to the lead SNP), including those 12 lead SNPs identified in the discovery GERA multiethnic GWAS analysis as covariates. We identified 3 additional SNPs with Bonferroni-level evidence of association with POAG that appeared to be independent of the lead SNP signals (P < 0.0001) at 3 loci (UCK2 on chromosome 1 (near TMCO1), CDKN2B-AS1 on chromosome 9, and near SIX1 on chromosome 14) (Supplementary Table 4). We then conducted an epistasis analysis of all pairs of lead SNPs in each race/ethnicity group, but did not observe significant epistatic interactions between SNPs after Bonferroni correction (P < 1.9 × 10−4 = 0.05/(((12 × 11)/2) × 4))).
Secondary and subgroup analyses
To further investigate whether the POAG susceptibility loci identified in this study influence glaucoma susceptibility through their effect on IOP or independently of IOP, we conducted three additional analyses. First, we examined the association of lead SNPs at these loci with IOP, which was assessed in the GERA cohort (see Methods). Of our 12 lead SNPs, 6 were associated at a Bonferroni level of significance (P < 0.0014 for 12 SNPs in 3 analyses): rs7524755 at TMCO1; rs56117902 at FMNL2; rs59521811 at AFAP1; rs9494457 at PDE7B; rs2472493 near ABCA1; and rs9913911 at GAS7 (Supplementary Table 5). Each of the POAG risk alleles was associated with greater IOP.
We then examined the association of these SNPs in two POAG subgroups: subjects with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) compared to controls (743 NTG cases vs. 58 426 controls) and subjects with high tension glaucoma (HTG) compared to controls (4243 HTG cases vs. 58 426 controls). In the NTG analysis, of our 12 lead SNPs, 3 were associated at a Bonferroni level of significance and each had more extreme odds ratios in comparison to their association in the POAG GWAS: rs6913530 near CDKN1A; rs10811645 at CDKN2B-AS1; and rs35155027 in SIX1-SIX6 (Supplementary Table 5). In the HTG analysis, all 12 lead SNPs were associated at Bonferroni significance, consistent with this subset making up the majority of the sample.
These results suggest that some of the POAG risk variants act through their effect on IOP, while others do not. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting NTG associations at CDKN2B-AS111,17. However, we did not confirm previous NTG associations on 8q22 (top SNP rs284491[C], OR = 1.06, P = 0.29) or 12q (rs2041895[C], OR = 1.04, P = 0.43)11,17 (Supplementary Table 6).
Replication of previous POAG GWAS results
We also investigated in GERA the lead SNPs within 19 loci associated with POAG at a genome-wide significance level or showing suggestive evidence (P < 10−6) in previous studies8–18 (Supplementary Table 7). Six of the 19 replicated at a genome-wide level of significance in our GERA multiethnic meta-analysis (including TMCO1 rs4656461, CDKN1A rs67530707, CDKN2B-AS1 rs4977756, ABCA1 rs2472493, SIX1/SIX6 rs10483727, and GAS7 rs9897123) (Supplementary Table 7). Further, 7 additional SNPs replicated at Bonferroni significance (P < 0.05/19 = 0.0026), and 1 (ATXN2 rs7137828) showed nominal evidence of association (P = 0.0034). The previously reported14 rs199748604 (TRIM9-TMX1) reached nominal significance in African-Americans, but not in the other race/ethnicity groups.
In contrast, two SNPs (at NCKAP5 and PMM2), which were reported with suggestive evidence of association with POAG in previous studies of Asian individuals10,12, were associated with POAG in neither the current GERA multiethnic meta-analysis (P > 0.05), nor in the East Asian race/ethnicity group. The absence of replication in our study is unlikely to be due to a lack of statistical power, as we have estimated that our study of 4986 cases and 58 426 controls (full GERA sample) or 441 cases and 4034 controls (GERA East Asian race/ethnicity group) had more than 80% power to detect the previously reported effects for both SNPs rs7588567 and rs3785176. We note that in our GERA sample, NCKAP5 rs7588567 had a moderate imputation quality score r2 in non-Hispanic whites (r2 = 0.64), as well as in Hispanic/Latinos (r2 = 0.63) and in African-Americans (r2 = 0.61). For this reason, rs7588567 was excluded from the meta-analysis across the 4 race/ethnicity groups. Consistent with a previous study conducted in African-American women14, DNAJC24 rs542340 and RBFOX1 rs192917960 were observed at a low frequency in African-Americans, and were not polymorphic (minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.01%) in other race/ethnicity groups. So, these two SNPs were excluded from the GERA multiethnic meta-analysis and were not associated with POAG in the African-American race/ethnicity group.
Array heritability estimates for POAG risk in GERA
We then estimated the proportion of variance in POAG risk explained by all SNPs on the genotyping array in the GERA non-Hispanic white sample using GCTA25. Assuming a prevalence of 3% for POAG2, we estimated an overall heritability of 0.26 (s.e. = 0.01). Our results are consistent with a recent phenome-wide heritability study conducted in the UKB and showing an overall heritability estimate of 0.26 (s.e. = 0.06) for glaucoma7.
Variability in POAG risk explained
We then examined the proportion of variance explained by previously known and newly discovered SNPs in GERA. Previously reported SNPs explained 2.1% of the variation in POAG risk in non-Hispanic whites, 0.5% in African-Americans, 2.0% in Hispanic/Latinos, and 0.3% in East Asians. Newly identified variants increased the proportion of variance explained to 3.0% in non-Hispanic whites, 3.1% in African-Americans, 3.3% in Hispanic/Latinos, and 0.5% in East Asians.
Lead glaucoma SNPs from UKB and replication in GERA
A genome-wide analysis of glaucoma in the UKB sample identified 18 glaucoma-associated loci that achieved a genome-wide level of significance, of which 9 have not been previously reported to be associated with glaucoma (Table 3 and Supplementary Figure 2). We then investigated the 9 lead SNPs representing each of the 9 independent novel loci for replication in the GERA POAG analysis. Of the 9 novel glaucoma-associated SNPs, 6 replicated at Bonferroni significance (P < 0.0055 = 0.05/9) in the GERA meta-analysis. These include rs56335522 near IKZF2 (P = 2.0 × 10−6), rs34201102 in CADM2 (P = 2.1 × 10−5), rs9853115 near DGKG (P = 2.2 × 10−5), rs76325372 in ANKH (P = 0.00045), rs2073006 in EXOC2 (P = 1.2 × 10−6), and rs55770306 in LMX1B (P = 0.00019) (Table 3). Two additional SNPs were associated in GERA at a nominal level of significance (P < 0.05); all 9 SNPs had the same direction of effect in GERA as in UKB.
Table 3.
SNP | Chr | Pos | Locus | Alleles | UKB discovery cohort | GERA replication cohort | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P | OR (95% CI) | P | |||||
rs2814471 | 1 | 165739598 | TMCO1 | C/T | 1.39 (1.32–1.45) | 7.5 × 10−44 | 1.34 (1.26–1.43) | 2.0 × 10−20 |
rs56335522 | 2 | 213758234 | near IKZF2 | G/C | 1.18 (1.11–1.25) | 1.7 × 10−8 | 1.20 (1.11–1.29) | 2.0 × 10−6 |
rs34201102 | 3 | 85137499 | CADM2 | A/G | 1.11 (1.08–1.15) | 6.1 × 10−10 | 1.10 (1.05–1.15) | 2.1 × 10−5 |
rs9853115 | 3 | 186131600 | near DGKG | T/A | 1.11 (1.07–1.15) | 1.7 × 10−9 | 1.10 (1.05–1.14) | 2.2 × 10−5 |
rs9330348 | 4 | 7883887 | AFAP1 | C/G | 1.16 (1.12–1.20) | 2.4 × 10−18 | 1.15 (1.10–1.20) | 5.7 × 10−10 |
rs76325372 | 5 | 14837332 | ANKH | A/C | 1.14 (1.09–1.18) | 1.4 × 10−10 | 1.09 (1.04–1.14) | 0.00045 |
rs2073006 | 6 | 637465 | EXOC2 | C/T | 0.86 (0.82–0.90) | 2.8 × 10−10 | 0.86 (0.81–0.92) | 1.2 × 10−6 |
rs12699251 | 7 | 11679113 | THSD7A | A/G | 0.90 (0.87–0.93) | 1.5 × 10−9 | 0.95 (0.90–0.99) | 0.017 |
rs6969706 | 7 | 116154831 | CAV1/CAV2 | G/T | 0.90 (0.86–0.93) | 8.4 × 10−9 | 0.91 (0.87–0.95) | 9.6 × 10−5 |
rs2514884 | 8 | 108276873 | ANGPT1 | C/T | 0.84 (0.80–0.88) | 1.4 × 10−11 | 0.93 (0.87–0.98) | 0.014 |
rs1333037 | 9 | 22040765 | CDKN2B-AS1 | C/T | 0.84 (0.81–0.87) | 2.4 × 10−23 | 0.77 (0.74–0.81) | 2.9 × 10−29 |
rs2472493 | 9 | 107695848 | near ABCA1 | G/A | 1.15 (1.12–1.19) | 6.3 × 10−17 | 1.17 (1.12–1.22) | 1.2 × 10−13 |
rs55770306 | 9 | 129388033 | LMX1B | C/A | 0.86 (0.83–0.90) | 5.5 × 10−14 | 0.90 (0.85–0.95) | 0.00019 |
rs2274224 | 10 | 96039597 | PLCE1 | G/C | 0.91 (0.88–0.94) | 3.1 × 10−8 | 0.96 (0.92–1.00) | 0.058 |
rs12806740 | 11 | 120203628 | TMEM136 | G/A | 0.90 (0.87–0.93) | 3.8 × 10−9 | 0.93 (0.89–0.97) | 0.0017 |
rs34935520 | 14 | 61091401 | SIX1/SIX6 | G/A | 1.14 (1.10–1.17) | 3.6 × 10−13 | 1.17 (1.12–1.22) | 1.8 × 10−12 |
rs9913911 | 17 | 10031183 | GAS7 | A/G | 1.17 (1.13–1.21) | 2.2 × 10−17 | 1.22 (1.17–1.28) | 1.5 × 10−18 |
rs58714937 | 22 | 19856710 | near TXNRD2 | C/T | 1.15 (1.10–1.21) | 8.3 × 10−9 | 1.15 (1.09–1.23) | 2.6 × 10−6 |
P-values in bold achieved genome-wide level of significance (P < 5 × 10−8); loci that are underlined are novel
SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism, Chr chromosome, Pos position, OR odds ratio
Multiethnic meta-analysis of UKB and GERA
We then conducted a multiethnic meta-analysis, combining the GERA and UKB cohorts. We identified 47 loci at a genome-wide level of significance, including an additional 24 novel loci (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 8). These 24 loci will need to be validated in an external replication sample to confirm their role in glaucoma susceptibility.
Ancestry analysis adjusting for known risk SNPs
To determine whether known POAG-associated loci explain the observed associations of genetic ancestry with the risk of POAG, we repeated the ancestry analysis within GERA Hispanic/Latinos, East Asians, and African-Americans, including all newly and previously identified POAG lead SNPs. The ancestry associations were significantly attenuated in African-Americans, but only slightly in the Hispanic/Latinos and slightly strengthened in East Asians (Supplementary Table 9).
Gene expression in human ocular tissues
To prioritize genes for further investigation, we identified the 95% credible set of variants in each locus identified in either GERA or UKB (Supplementary Data 1). We then examined expression levels in silico for the 28 genes in the 24 unique loci that contained associated 95% credible set variants in human ocular tissues using two publicly available databases: the Ocular Tissue Database (OTDB)26; and EyeSAGE27,28. According to OTDB, most of the identified genes were expressed in most ocular tissues (Supplementary Table 10).
Gene expression in mouse ocular tissues
RGCs are the primary cell type affected in glaucoma, however, treatments conferring cytoprotection to RGCs have not been identified due to limitations in our understanding of glaucomatous degeneration. Susceptibility factors both intrinsic to RGCs and the cells that surround the RGC axons in the optic nerve head, including astroglia, microglia, and endothelial cells are thought to be critical mediators of the degenerative process. We first determined whether genes in the associated loci serve as susceptibility factors contributing to glaucomatous neurodegeneration. To this end, we assessed the expression of each gene implicated in the 95% credible sets and that also has a mouse homolog in the RGCs or the optic nerve head tissue of the DBA/2J (D2) inherited mouse model of glaucoma (Supplementary Data 1—see Methods). Specifically, we utilized previously published RNA-sequencing datasets from RGCs isolated from D2 retina29, and the microarray gene expression datasets of the D2 optic nerve head, a critical injury site mainly comprising of RGC axons, astroglia, microglia, and blood vessels30. These datasets were compared to their respective age- and sex-matched genetic controls (D2-Gpnmb+, a strain that does not develop high IOP or glaucoma)29. We specifically assessed the expression of 24 genes in 4 distinct glaucoma groups (grouping performed by hierarchical clustering (HC) based on gene expression patterns) or various stages based on disease severity (see Methods) compared to the control group.
Based on expression profiling of the RGCs, 12 of the genes were differentially expressed (at a false discovery rate (FDR) q < 0.05) in one or more of the glaucoma groups compared to controls (Supplementary Figure 4a). These included Angpt1, Ank, Cadm2, Fmnl2, Plce1, Thsd7a, and Tmtc2 at the novel POAG/glaucoma loci identified in the current study. Seven of the 12 differentially expressed genes show moderate to high expression in mouse RGCs (i.e., at a normalized count per million of >100), including Afap1, Ank, Cadm2, Gas7, Thsd7a, Tmem136, and Tmtc2 (Supplementary Figure 4b). Based on the gene profiling in the optic nerve head tissue, Cadm2, Cdkn2b, and Tmtc2 exhibit altered expression very early and across all stages of glaucoma (early to severe, Supplementary Table 11). Thus, expression profiling has facilitated identification of initial set of genes that warrant further interrogation to determine their potential role in modulating susceptibility of RGC cells and their axons in response to high IOP.
Trabecular meshwork modifications due to FMNL2 silencing
We hypothesized that FMNL2, a gene in one of the novel POAG-associated loci that is also associated with IOP31, supports trabecular meshwork (TM) function relevant to aqueous humor outflow regulation. FMNL2 belongs to the formin-related family of proteins that acts as a downstream effector of CDC42 (Rho family member) regulating the shape and movement of cells through its effect on actin nucleation and elongation32,33. Regulation of actin cytoskeletal dynamics, including formation of actin stress fibers, is critical for contractile properties of cells. The outflow of aqueous humor through the ocular drainage system is dependent on the contractile properties of TM cells34,35. Here we examined whether FMNL2 contributes to the assembly of actin stress fibers, and induces cell morphological changes of TM cells, a process critical for supporting contractile activity.
To this end, cells from a HTM cell line were transfected with siRNAs to suppress the expression of FMNL2. We confirmed that siRNAs targeting FMNL2 caused a significant knockdown of FMNL2 expression, but did not alter the expression of a related gene FMNL3, a paralog of FMNL2 (Fig. 3a). Our results show that serum-starved HTM cells transfected with FMNL2 siRNA exhibited a refractile morphology, appearing deformed or rounded, whereas cells transfected with control siRNA, exhibited a more flattened or spread morphology (Fig. 3b, c and Supplementary Figure 5). Moreover, in the serum-starved cells, the actin stress fibers, visualized by phalloidin staining of actin filaments, were disrupted in both the control or FMNL2 siRNA-transfected HTM cells (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Figure 5). Overall, our data suggest that knockdown of FMNL2 induces changes in HTM cell morphology likely due to its effect on actin stress fiber assembly.
Genetic background influenced the effect of Lmx1b mutations
Mutations in LMX1B are previously established to cause nail-patella syndrome (NPS), a rare developmental disorder characterized by skeletal abnormalities, as well as kidney and eye defects36,37. The presentation of glaucoma in NPS patients is variable; some patients develop a phenotype resembling open-angle glaucoma, while in others, glaucoma is accompanied by developmental defects of the ocular anterior segment, including cataracts and abnormalities of the iris and cornea37,38. We have previously characterized a mouse model carrying a dominant missense mutation in Lmx1b (Lmx1bV265D) that develops elevated IOP and glaucoma along with severe ocular developmental anomalies39. Here, to functionally evaluate whether Lmx1b mutations can cause glaucoma without obvious developmental anomalies, we studied the effects of the same mutation on two different genetic backgrounds, and a new mutation that has not previously been functionally characterized. Specifically, the Lmx1bV265D allele was backcrossed onto the C57BL/6J (B6) and 129S6/SvEvTac (129) strain backgrounds; the Lmx1bQ82X allele was present on a DBA/2J.Gpnmb(wt) (D2) background.
Slit lamp-based clinical eye examination showed that the B6 mutant mice exhibit a severe developmental phenotype characterized by malformed eccentric pupils, irido-corneal strands, corneal haze, and corneal scleralization (Fig. 4a). The developmental phenotype on a 129 background was much milder, and mainly limited to mild pupillary abnormalities in about half of the mice. No major developmental abnormalities were detected in D2 mice with the Lmx1bQ82X allele (focal corneal keratopathy is an unrelated strain characteristic of D2 mice that is frequently present in both wild-type (WT) and mutant mice). Further, with age, high IOP often results in a more dilated pupil in D2.Lmx1bQ82X/+ mice. The B6.Lmx1bV265D/+ and D2.Lmx1bQ28X/+ mice were highly susceptible to developing glaucomatous nerve damage (Fig. 4b, c). Finally, Lmx1b mutations induced elevated IOP in all three strain backgrounds (Fig. 4d, e). IOP is highly variable in the B6.Lmx1bV265D/+, which is possibly caused by a variety of reasons. One possible explanation for the spread of IOPs is due to Lmx1b mutants exhibiting abnormal corneas that are often stretched and sometimes perforate. This is a likely explanation, especially considering that B6 Lmx1b mutants have the most severely affected corneas as well as the lowest IOPs. Additionally, variability in IOP may result from stochastic variation in developmental consequences resulting from the Lmx1b mutation. As precedents, various mutant genes that affect development of ocular drainage structures also variably result in maldevelopment of the ciliary body40,41. Overall, our data demonstrate that genetic background has a profound impact on the manifestation of glaucoma-related phenotypes caused by mutations in Lmx1b. Importantly, the presence of high IOP or glaucoma in eyes without major developmental anomalies further supports a role of LMX1B in the pathogenesis of OHTN and glaucoma in the general population.
Discussion
In the large, ethnically diverse GERA cohort, we discovered 5 novel genome-wide significant POAG loci, of which 3 (FMNL2, PDE7B, and near TMTC2) replicated at a Bonferroni level of significance in the UKB cohort. We also investigated 9 novel glaucoma-associated loci from UKB in GERA, and 6 of the novel loci replicated at Bonferroni significance (near IKZF2, CADM2, near DGKG, ANKH, EXOC2, and LMX1B). Further, a multiethnic meta-analysis combining GERA and UKB identified an additional 24 novel loci that await validation in an external replication cohort. Our results also confirmed the association of variants with POAG in 14 previously reported loci, including TGFBR3, TMCO1, AFAP1, FOXC1, GMDS, CDKN1A, CAV1/CAV2, CDKN2B-AS1, ABCA1, ARHGEF12, ATXN2, SIX1/SIX6, GAS7, and TXNRD2.
We recently reported31 that variants at FMNL2 are associated with variation in IOP levels. Here we have demonstrated that variants at FMNL2 are also associated with the risk of POAG, with the higher IOP level allele associated with an increased risk of POAG. Therefore, FMNL2 likely contributes to glaucoma susceptibility through its effect on elevated IOP. Consistent with this suggested mechanism of action, we showed that FMNL2 participates in the assembly of actin stress fibers and induction of morphological changes of HTM cells. Actin stress fibers are bundles of contractile actomyosin that play an important role in mediating cellular adhesion and morphogenesis. The small GTPases RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 mainly regulate dynamics of actin assembly and disassembly. In general, RhoA is thought to directly promote formation of actin stress fibers through its downstream effector, Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK)42. Inhibitors of ROCK have been reported to disrupt actin stress fiber formation and modulate contractile activity of TM cells, thereby increasing aqueous outflow and lowering IOP35,43. Recently, an ophthalmic solution consisting of netarsudil 0.02% [Rhopressa®], a ROCK inhibitor has been approved in the United States for the reduction of elevated IOP in patients with POAG44. Another ophthalmic solution, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate [Glanatec®], which is also a ROCK inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of glaucoma and OHTN45. The small GTPase Cdc42 acts through its downstream mediators FMNL2 and FMNL3 to indirectly regulate the organization of the stress fibers by inducing formation of filopodia and promoting cell migration33. The function of FMNL2 in non-motile cells is not well defined. Our findings suggest a role of FMNL2 in the assembly of actin stress fibers and for inducing morphological changes of TM cells, functions integral to the regulation of aqueous outflow and maintenance of normal IOP. The effect of FMNL2 on actin stress fiber formation is likely to be indirect via its influence on cell adhesion-based mechanisms that generate cellular tension and leading to RhoA activation32,46.
We also identified a new region associated with POAG at PDE7B on chromosome 6. PDE7B encodes phosphodiesterase (PDE) 7B, a cAMP-specific PDE member of the cyclic nucleotide PDE family. The concentration of cAMP, a key second messenger of several biological processes is tightly regulated, by balancing its synthesis by adenylyl cyclases and its degradation by cAMP-specific PDEs. Pharmacologic inhibition or genetic inactivation of soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC) in mice suppresses aqueous humor outflow, leading to elevated IOP47. Additionally, activation of sAC has been shown to elevate cAMP levels in RGCs, a critical step necessary for promoting RGC survival48. Thus, PDE7B through its effect on the regulation of cAMP levels may contribute to aqueous humor outflow or support RGC survival, functions that have important consequences in the pathogenesis of glaucoma.
The mechanisms that render RGCs susceptible to glaucomatous damage are largely unknown. Various insults including ischemia, excitotoxicity, inflammation, axonal injury, and glial activation have been proposed to contribute to RGC damage49. Degenerative programs both intrinsic and extrinsic to RGCs and their axons have been suggested to contribute to glaucomatous neurodegeneration49,50. Here we have identified a set of genes in POAG-associated loci whose expression is altered in the RGCs (e.g., Ank, Cadm2, and Six6) and the optic nerve head (e.g., Cadm2 and Cdkn2b) in a mouse model of glaucoma. Some of these expression changes occur very early, even before their eyes show any signs of RGC loss, suggesting some of these genes may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Future studies will determine if the identified genes are part of the pathways conferring susceptibility to glaucomatous neurodegeneration.
Our study also identified a new region on chromosome 12 associated with POAG, near TMTC2. The TMTC2 locus has been previously reported to be associated with POAG in a Japanese population51, with a different lead SNP (rs7961953), however, this association did not reach a genome-wide level of significance, possibly due to limited sample size (total of 827 Japanese POAG patients and 748 control subjects without glaucoma)51. More recently, a study of optic disc morphology identified genome-wide significant associations between variants near TMTC2 and optic disc size and cup area52. Genetic variation in the TMTC2 locus may contribute to glaucomatous neurodegeneration through its effect on optic nerve morphology.
Further, we identified LMX1B as a glaucoma susceptibility locus. LMX1B gene encodes LIM (Lin-1, Isl-1, and Mec-3)-homeodomain transcription factor 1 beta, and rare deleterious mutations in LMX1B cause NPS, with glaucoma being one of the manifestations of the syndrome36,53. Haploinsufficiency of LMX1B is generally accepted to cause NPS, but dominant negative effects are also possible37,39. Substantial phenotypic variability occurs among NPS patients with glaucoma occurring in about 30% of these patients36,37. In many of these patients, the glaucoma phenotype appears similar to open-angle glaucoma37,38, with no obvious structural abnormalities in the anterior segment. In other patients, anterior segment developmental defects, including cataracts and abnormalities of the iris and cornea, are present, leading to the suggestion that LMX1B mutations contribute to the spectrum of glaucomas resulting from developmental defects37. Our findings demonstrate strong modifying effects of genetic background on ocular phenotypes induced by Lmx1b mutations, such that the mutations cause elevated IOP and glaucomatous nerve damage both in the presence and in the absence of obvious ocular developmental anomalies. This demonstration that Lmx1b mutations result in elevated IOP and glaucomatous nerve damage in eyes without developmental defects, supports the notion that LMX1B affects the risk of glaucoma in the absence of obvious developmental anomalies in human eyes.
Finally, our study reports differences in the prevalence of POAG across race/ethnicity groups, consistent with previous reports54. Within Hispanic/Latinos, East Asians, and African-Americans, the risk of POAG was associated with genetic ancestry. Specifically, a greater risk of POAG was associated with higher Native American (compared to European) ancestry among Hispanic/Latinos, higher northern East Asian (compared to southern East Asian) ancestry among East Asians, and higher African (compared to European) ancestry among African-Americans. After taking into account the effect of newly and previously identified SNPs, the ancestry association in African-Americans was attenuated, the association of ancestry in Hispanic/Latinos was nearly unchanged, and in East Asians the association with ancestry became slightly stronger. Thus, the identified POAG loci can explain some of the ancestry effects in African-Americans, but not Hispanic/Latinos and East Asians, suggesting that additional POAG risk loci that correlate with ancestry within East Asian and Hispanic populations remain to be discovered.
We recognize several potential limitations of our study. First, glaucoma diagnoses in UKB (our replication sample) were based on self-reported data, and the subtypes of glaucoma were unspecified, which may result in underestimates of the effects of individual SNPs due to phenotype misclassification. As a consequence, our replication analysis based on the UKB was likely underpowered relative to its sample size. However, in UKB, the proportion of glaucoma cases was relatively close to that reported for the global prevalence of glaucoma for population aged 40–80 years1,2. Second, the GERA non-Hispanic white participants were older on average than the GERA participants from the other race/ethnicity groups (Hispanic/Latino, East Asian, and African-American). This could explain the similar proportion of POAG cases in non-Hispanic whites and Hispanic/Latinos in our study, as advancing age has been shown to be a major risk factor for POAG1,2. Third, in our study, we note that the African-American subgroup has the smallest sample size compared to the other race/ethnicity groups, potentially limiting statistical power to detect some SNP associations. We note, however, that we did observe nominally significant associations with several previously reported and newly identified POAG risk loci in this group. Finally, although investigating all implicated genes in the current study would be of great interest, we restricted our functional investigations to two genes (FMNL2 and LMX1B) because they were implicated in the 95% credible set, were novel loci, replicated in an independent cohort, and resources were available for functional characterization. Further, the use of the transformed human NTM-5 cells as opposed to primary HTM cells to study FMNL2 function represents another limitation of the study.
In conclusion, we identified a total of 9 novel loci associated with the risk of POAG/glaucoma at a genome-wide significance level that replicated in an independent sample. Our multiethnic meta-analysis combining GERA and UKB identified an additional 24 novel loci that await validation. These loci explain some, but not all, of the observed effect of genetic ancestry on POAG susceptibility. Our expression analyses of RGCs and optic nerve head tissue suggest that several newly identified candidate genes may play a role in glaucomatous neurodegeneration. Finally, functional characterization of FMNL2 and LMX1B points to a mechanistic effect on IOP levels, which supports their role as glaucoma risk genes.
Methods
GERA population
We report a GWAS of glaucoma in 4 986 cases and 58 426 controls from the GERA cohort. The GERA cohort consists of 110 266 adults who consented to participate in the Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health, established for members of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Plan, Northern California Region (KPNC)55,56. The Institutional Review Board of the Kaiser Foundation Research Institute has approved all study procedures.
Case and control definition
All GERA subjects included in this study had valid IOP measures, as previously described31. Briefly, non-numeric entries for IOP, extreme values (≤5 and >60 mm Hg), and measurements taken on a single eye were removed. Further, IOP measurements that were taken after initial prescription of IOP-lowering medications were excluded to avoid values influenced by treatment. Because IOP-lowering medications are almost always prescribed before IOP-lowering surgical interventions (i.e., laser trabeculoplasty, trabeculectomy, tube shunt procedures, etc.), we did not remove subjects who had these surgical interventions. Patients eligible for inclusion were identified from clinical diagnoses captured in the KPNC electronic health record (EHR) system. These clinical diagnoses were recorded in the EHR system as International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes. We defined glaucoma cases as having at least: (1) two diagnoses of POAG (ICD-9 codes 365.01, 365.1, 365.10, 365.11, and 365.15); or (2) two diagnoses of NTG (ICD-9 code 365.12); or (3) one diagnosis of POAG and one diagnosis of NTG. In all cases, at least one of the diagnoses was made by a Kaiser Permanente ophthalmologist. Further, the cases did not have any diagnosis of other subtypes of glaucoma (e.g., pseudoexfoliation, pigmentary, or PACG; ICD-9 codes 365.52, 365.13, and 365.2, respectively). After excluding subjects who have one or more diagnosis of any type of glaucoma (ICD-9 code, 365.xx), our control group included all the non-cases. Subjects who had no diagnosis of any type of glaucoma (any ICD-9 code 365.xx other than 365.04) but did have a diagnosis of OHTN (ICD-9 code 365.04), were included as controls. In total, 4986 POAG (including 743 NTG cases and 4 243 HTG cases) and 58 426 controls from GERA were included in this study.
Genotyping and quality control and imputation
GERA individuals’ DNA samples were extracted using Oragene kits (DNA Genotek Inc., Ottawa, ON, Canada) at KPNC and genotyped at the Genomics Core Facility of UCSF. DNA samples were genotyped at over 665 000 genetic markers on four race/ethnicity-specific Affymetrix Axiom arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) optimized for European, Latino, East Asian, and African-American individuals57,58. We performed genotype quality control (QC) procedures for the GERA samples on an array-wise basis56. Briefly, we included genetic markers with initial genotyping call rate ≥ 97%, genotype concordance rate > 0.75 across duplicate samples, and allele frequency difference ≤ 0.15 between females and males for autosomal markers. Approximately 94% of samples and over 98% of genetic markers assayed reached QC procedures. Moreover, genetic markers with genotype call rates < 90% were excluded, as well as genetic markers with a MAF < 1%.
We also performed imputation on an array-wise basis. Following the pre-phasing of genotypes with Shape-IT v2.r7271959, we imputed genetic markers from the cosmopolitan 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (phase I integrated release; http://1000genomes.org) using IMPUTE2 v2.3.060.We used the information r2 from IMPUTE2 as a QC parameter, which is an estimate of the correlation of the imputed genotype to the true genotype61. Genetic markers with an imputation r2 < 0.3 were removed, and we restricted to markers that had a minor allele count ≥ 20.
GWAS analysis and covariate adjustment
We first analyzed each of the four self-reported race/ethnicity groups (non-Hispanic whites, Hispanic/Latinos, East Asians, and African-Americans) separately. We ran a logistic regression of POAG and each SNP using PLINK62 v1.9 (www.cog-genomics.org/plink/1.9/) with the following covariates: age; sex; and ancestry principal components (PCs). We modeled data from each genetic marker using additive dosages to account for the uncertainty of imputation63.
Eigenstrat64 v4.2 was used to calculate the PCs on each of the 4 race/ethnicity groups, and subjects were included for analyses in their self-reported group, as previously described55. We included as covariates the top 10 ancestry PCs for the non-Hispanic whites, whereas we included the top 6 ancestry PCs for the 3 other race/ethnicity groups. To adjust for genetic ancestry, we also included the percentage of Ashkenazi (ASHK) ancestry as a covariate for the non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity group analysis55. The ASHK proportion was extracted from the initial European PC analysis, where individuals of European and ASHK ancestries were run together to produce eigenvectors. The clusters resulting from this were re-classified as 0.0, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 ASHK (by drawing grids in the PC1–PC2 space). A full description of the ancestry analyses is provided in Banda et al.55.
GERA meta-analysis of POAG
We then undertook a GERA meta-analysis of POAG to combine the results of the four race/ethnicity groups using the R65 (https://www.R-project.org) package “meta”. We calculated fixed effects summary estimates for an additive model. We also estimated heterogeneity index, I2 (0–100%) as well as P-value for Cochrane’s Q statistic among groups. For each locus, we defined the top SNP as the most significant SNP within a 2 Mb window, and novel loci were defined as those that were located over 1 Mb apart from any previously reported locus.
Plots of POAG prevalence vs. genetic ancestry
To visualize the glaucoma distribution by the ancestry PCs, we created a smoothed distribution of each individual i’s glaucoma phenotype using a radial kernel density estimate weighted on the distance to each other jth individual, ∑jϕ({d(i,j)/maxi′,j′[d(i′,j′)] × k)}), where ϕ(.) is the standard normal density distribution, k is the smooth value (5 for non-Hispanic whites; and 15 for East Asians, Hispanic/Latinos, and African-Americans), and d(i′,j′) is the Euclidean distance based on the first two PCs. Race/ethnicity and/or nationality subgroup labels were derived from GERA or the Human Genome Diversity Project for visual representation of different groups55.
Secondary and subgroup analyses in GERA
As a secondary analysis, we also assessed the associations between the 12 POAG-associated loci identified in GERA and IOP. IOP values were entered by clinicians at each vision encounter and were captured in the EHRs31. To measure IOP in KPNC ophthalmology practices, the major standard equipment used is a Goldmann applanation tonometer (Haag-Streit, Bern, Switzerland), followed by a non-contact tonometer (Nidek TonoRef II), a Tono-Pen XL, an iCare rebound tonometer (Tiolat, Helsinki, Finland) and other equipment, such as pneumotonometers. We evaluated individual’s mean IOP from both eyes for each visit, and the individual’s median of the mean across all the visits was used for analysis. A linear regression of IOP and each SNP was performed using PLINK v1.9 with age, sex, and ancestry PCs as covariates.
For the NTG and HTG analyses, we divided the POAG group into those subjects who met criteria for NTG (NTG group) and those subjects who met criteria for POAG but not NTG (HTG group). For the 373 subjects who met criteria for both POAG and NTG, an ophthalmologist (R.M.) chart reviewed each subject to categorize them into either group.
Conditional association analyses were conducted to identify additional independent SNPs at each locus by including all the 12 lead SNPs identified in the GERA multiethnic meta-analysis as covariates in the regression model. We evaluated whether any additional SNPs within a 2 Mb window (±1.0 Mb with respect to the original top SNP) achieved genome-wide significance. Associations that replicate at a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of 0.05/500 = 0.0001 (corresponding to an estimate of ~500 independent SNPs per locus for 2 Mb interval surrounding each of our original signals)66 are reported. Finally, we conducted an epistasis analysis of all pairs of top SNPs in the four GERA race/ethnicity groups. For this analysis, a Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold of 0.05/264 = 1.9 × 10−4 (accounting for the number of SNP pairs tested (12 × 11)/2, and for the four race/ethnicity groups) was applied.
Replication analysis of previously reported SNPs in GERA
To assess whether the 19 previously described POAG-associated loci replicated in the GERA cohort, we tested 19 statistically independent top SNPs previously described to be associated at a genome-wide level of significance (N = 17) or showing suggestive evidence (N = 2) of association (P < 10−6)8–18. We reported a nominal significance level of 0.05 and a more stringent multiple testing correction accounting for the number of variants tested (Bonferroni-corrected alpha level of 0.0026 (=0.05/19)).
GWAS heritability estimates and variance explained
SNP-based heritability estimates were estimated for POAG using the GCTA software25. GCTA software computes the phenotypic variance explained by all analyzed genetic markers in the genome by restricted maximum likelihood reached using expectation maximization. The analysis was restricted to autosomal markers, and we applied a genetic relationship matrix cutoff of 0.025. For statistical power purposes, the SNP-based heritability estimates analysis was conducted in the the non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity group, which is the largest group of individuals in GERA.
UK Biobank
To test the five novel GERA genome-wide significant SNPs for replication, we evaluated associations in the multiethnic UKB23, which consisted of 7 329 glaucoma (subtype unspecified) cases and 169 561 controls from five race/ethnicity groups (European, East Asian, South Asian, African British, and mixed ancestries) (Supplementary Table 3). Imputation to the Haplotype Reference Consortium (HRC) has been described (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk), and imputation at a few non-HRC sites (for replication) was done pre-phasing with Eagle67 and imputing with Minimac368 with the 1000 Genomes Project Phase I. The glaucoma phenotype was assessed through a touchscreen self-report questionnaire completed at the Assessment Centre, via the question “Has a doctor told you that you have any of the following problems with your eyes?”, and cases were defined as those reporting “glaucoma.” The control group included the non-cases and excluded subjects who reported “Prefer not to answer” or “Do not know.”
In silico analyses
To provide a list of candidate genes for follow-up functional evaluation, a Bayesian approach (CAVIARBF)69 was used, wich is publicly available at https://bitbucket.org/Wenan/caviarbf. This approach has been successfully used in previous studies66,70. For each of the associated signals, we computed each variant’s capacity to explain the identified signal within a 2 Mb window (±1.0 Mb with respect to the original top variant) and derived the smallest set of variants that included the causal variant with 95% probability (95% credible set). A total of 1 098 variants in 28 annotated genes were included in these 24 credible sets (Supplementary Data 1).
We evaluated expression of the genes that contained associated 95% credible set variants in human ocular tissues using two publicly available databases: the OTDB26; and EyeSAGE27,28 publicly available at https://genome.uiowa.edu/otdb/ and http://neibank.nei.nih.gov/EyeSAGE/index.shtml, respectively. The OTDB consists of gene expression data for 10 eye tissues from 20 normal human donors, and the gene expression is described as Affymetrix Probe Logarithmic Intensity Error (PLIER) normalized value26.
Gene expression in DBA/2J mice ocular tissues
RNA-seq was performed on RGCs isolated from the retina of either 9-month-old D2 mice or a genetically matched control strain (substrain of D2 mice, D2-Gpnmb+ that do not develop high IOP/glaucoma)29. D2 and D2-Gpnmb+ mice used for the gene expression studies were from the The Jackson Laboratory, and experimental mice were all 9-month-old females (Gene Expression Omnibus accession number GSE90654). The D2 mouse is an age-dependent model of OHTN/glaucoma that closely mimics human pigmentary glaucoma71. In the D2 mouse, mutations in two alleles (GpnmbR150X and Tyrp1b) drive progressive iris pigment dispersion and iris stromal atrophy that blocks and damages the ocular drainage tissue, leading to elevated IOP72. In our colony, D2 mice begin to exhibit high IOP around 6 months of age, and by 9 months of age (the age that we profiled) the majority of eyes have undergone periods of elevated IOP but are yet to develop any detectable RGC degeneration. Following this period of IOP elevation, the optic nerve progressively degenerates from 10 months onwards and degeneration is almost complete by 12 months of age (>70% of eyes have severe glaucoma)71. We chose the 9-month time point for RNA-sequencing analysis, as the majority of D2 eyes at this time point have intact axons despite experiencing high IOP, thereby providing us an avenue to capture very early disease relevant molecular changes prior to any noticeable axonal degeneration. We employed HC of transcriptomic datasets to generate unbiased unique clusters based on gene expression patterns within D2 samples. We identified four distinct groups; D2 group 1 being transcriptomically identical to the control strain (D2-Gpnmb+); and D2 groups 2–4 exhibiting increasing levels of dissimilarity compared to the control group at a transcriptomic level29. We compared gene expression profiles of each of the D2 groups with the control group. Out of the 28 genes that were implicated in the 95% credible set of variants, some did not have mouse homologs or available data (e.g., LOC105378189, LOC145783, LMX1B, and ZNF280D). We also examined the expression of TMTC2 as our lead SNP that reached genome-wide level of significance in the GERA discovery cohort was near this gene. However, the true causal variant at this locus has <5% chance of being within TMTC2. We conducted adjustment for multiple testing using FDR (q), and genes were considered to be significantly differentially expressed at an FDR < 0.05.
We used the DATGAN software30 to assess the expression of the genes that contained associated 95% credible set variants, in optic nerve head punches of D2 mouse model of glaucoma (http://glaucomadb.jax.org/glaucoma (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-429)). Briefly, the optic nerve head was dissected and profiled using Mouse 430 v2 arrays (Affymetrix) for 50 DBA/2J eyes and 10 DBA/2J-Gpnmb+ controls. HC was performed to identify groups of eyes undergoing molecular changes prior to morphological changes in glaucoma. Eyes were clustered into different stages using the expression profiles from the optic nerve head (Accession number: GSE26299)30. Data represent the log2 fold change and q-value between D2 and D2.Gpnmb+ (control) samples. q-Values < 0.05 were considered significant.
HTM cell culture and transfection
Experiments were performed utilizing previously characterized HTM cell line NTM-573 (gift from Gulab Zode, University of North Texas Health Science, Fort Worth, Texas). HTM cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and F12 containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). For gene silencing, we used two separate siRNAs targeting different regions of FMNL2. siRNA1: SMARTpool ON-TARGETplus FMNL2 siRNA (Dharmacon, #Cat L-031993-01). siRNA2: SMARTpool siGENOME FMNL2 siRNA (Dharmacon #Cat M-031993-01). Non-targeting siRNA (Dharmacon #Cat D-001810-01) was used as a control siRNA. HTM cells were transfected either with FMNL2 siRNA1, FMNL2 siRNA2, or control siRNA. Briefly, 2 × 105 cells were added to wells containing siRNAs to achieve a final siRNA concentration of 100 nM. Reverse transfection was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and the cells were cultured for about 48 h to suppress expression of FMNL2 before utilizing them for phenotypic characterization.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was isolated from siRNA-transfected HTM cells using the Qiagen RNeasy with on-column DNase I treatment (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on a Bio-Rad C1000 Thermal Cycler/CF96 Real-Time System using SsoAdvancedTM SYBR Green® Supermix (Bio-Rad). The primer sets used in our experiments are listed in Supplementary Table 12. Each reaction was run in technical duplicates and a minimum of four biological replicates used per group. The relative expression level of each gene was normalized to housekeeping genes (ACTB and MAPK1) and analyzed using the CFX manager software (Bio-Rad).
Phalloidin staining and cell morphology and counting
Following FMNL2 gene silencing using siRNAs for 24 h, the HTM cells were serum-starved for another 24 h (no FBS). For the FBS-treated groups (+FBS), cell were exposed to media containing 10% FBS for 10 min or 1 h. HTM cells were then fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-100. To assess assembly of filamentous actin (F-actin), the HTM cells were then incubated with PBS containing 2 μM fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled phalloidin for 30 min at 37 °C and finally mounted on a slide using VECTASHIELD mounting medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories Burlingame, CA, USA). Cells were visualized under fluorescence microscope (Zeiss LSM 700 laser scanning confocal microscope) to assess assembly of actin filament/stress fibers. To quantify changes in cellular morphology, the cells were categorized into three groups based on their shape, (1) rounded/deformed: cells that adhere poorly and appear as deformed or round; (2) intermediate: cells showing modest spreading; and (3) spread: cells that are well spread. Proportion of cells in each group was calculated and expressed as percentage. Three independent experiments were performed for each condition. At least 400 cells were counted for each experiment. The Pearson’ chi-squared test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance among the groups. We used 2 × 2 and 2 × 3 contingency tables for −FBS and +FBS conditions, respectively.
Mice and husbandry
The Lmx1bV265D allele was backcrossed to the C57BL/6J (B6) and 129SvEvTac strain backgrounds for six or more generations. This allele is also known as the Lmx1bIcst39. Strains for backcrossing were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). The Lmx1bQ82X allele is an independent and previously uncharacterized ENU-induced allele that was generated on a DBA/2J (D2) strain background that has a genetic sensitizer and is WT for the Gpnmb+ gene but by itself does not develop high IOP or glaucoma (D2.Cg-Gpnmb+Cyp1b1tm1Gonz strain background). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of the G1 with the Lmx1bQ82X allele allowed genetic mapping on this same strain background using custom markers developed from the pool of incidental mutations identified via WGS. The phenotype was mapped using over 500 meioses to a 6.7-Mb region where the Lmx1bQ82Xallele is the only mutation predicted to affect gene function. The Animal Care and Use Committee of The Jackson Laboratory approved all experimental protocols. Mutant and control littermates were housed together in cages with Alpha-Dri bedding covered with polyester filters. Cages were maintained in an environment kept at 21 °C with a 14-h light:10-h dark cycle.
Genotyping of the Lmx1b allele
Genotype of the Lmx1bV265D and Lmx1b+ alleles was determined using an allele-specific PCR protocol. Genomic DNA was PCR amplified with forward primer for the V265D allele 5′-TCAGCGTGCGTGTGGTCCTGGA-3′, the forward primer for the WT allele 5′-GACATTGGCAGCAGAGACAGGCCGAGGCGTGCGTGTGGTCCATGT-3′, and the reverse primer 5′-ACACAAGCCTCTGCCTCCTT-3′. This same allele was previously named lcst39. Genomic DNA was PCR amplified using the following program: (1) 95 °C for 2 min; (2) 95 °C for 15 s; (3) 57 °C for 20 s; (4) 72 °C for 30 s; (5) repeat steps 2–4 35 times; and (6) 72 °C for 7 min. A volume of 5 μl of sample was run on a 3% agarose gel. The WT allele amplifies a 175-base pair fragment and the V265D allele amplifies a 152-base pair fragment. Genotyping of the Lmx1bQ82X and Lmx1b+ alleles was determined by direct Sanger sequencing of a specific PCR product. Genomic DNA was PCR amplified with forward primer 5′-CTTTGAGCCATCGGAGCTG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-ATCTCCGACCGCTTCCTGAT-3′ using the following program: (1) 94 °C for 3 min; (2) 94 °C for 30 s; (3) 57 °C for 30 s; (4) 72 °C for 1 min; (5) repeat steps 2–4 35 times; and (6) 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were purified and sequenced by the Genome Technologies service at The Jackson Laboratory.
Clinical examination
Detailed clinical evaluations were performed at 9 months of age using a slit lamp biomicroscope and photographed with a ×40 objective lens. Phenotypic evaluation included iris structure, pupillary abnormalities, generalized corneal haze, anterior and posterior synechia, corneal opacity, hyphaema, hypopyon, corneal pyogenic granuloma, vascularized scarred cornea, buphthalmos, cataracts, and deepening of the anterior chamber. Detailed examination of at least 30 eyes from each strain and genotype was performed. All cohorts included male and female mice.
IOP measurement
IOP was measured using the microneedle method as previously described in detail74. Briefly, mice were acclimatized to the procedure room and anesthetized via an intraperitoneal injection of a mixture of ketamine (99 mg/kg; Ketlar, Parke-Davis, Paramus, NJ) and xylazine (9 mg/kg; Rompun, Phoenix Pharmaceutical, St. Joseph, MO) prior to IOP assessment—a procedure that does not alter IOP in the experimental window74. All cohorts included male and female mice. The IOPs of B6 mice were assessed in parallel with experimental mice as a methodological control to ensure proper calibration and equipment function. The IOP values are highly variable in B6.Lmx1bV265D/+ eyes. Lmx1b mutants have abnormal corneas that are often stretched and sometimes perforate, and this perforation results in lower IOP values, which may explain the greater spread of IOP values in B6 Lmx1b mutants. To evaluate the change in the range of IOP values in Lmx1b mutant eyes across strains relative to controls, we used k-means clustering. We set k = 3 for each individual group. The cluster with the highest IOP values was taken from each group and a one-way analysis of variance was performed. Tukey’s honest significance difference was used to compare the means between Lmx1b mutant and WT mice within each strain.
Ocular and optic nerve histological analysis
Enucleated eyes were fixed for plastic sectioning as described in detail75. Serial sagittal sections were collected, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and analyzed for pathologic alterations. Intracranial portions of optic nerves were dissected, processed, and analyzed as previously described and validated71. Briefly, we stained optic nerve cross sections with para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and then weinvestigated for glaucomatous damage. Because PPD stain differently stains the myelin sheaths and the axoplasm of healthy axons compared to those from sick or dying axons, we were able to detect axon damage and loss in a very sensitive way. The degree of nerve damage was assigned using a well-established protocol that has been extensively validated against axon counting71,76. Nerves with severe degeneration have >50% axon loss compared to controls, nerves with moderate moderate degeneration has on 30% average axon loss while nerves with no glaucoma are indistinguishable from controls. To determine whether optic nerve damage levels were dependent on Lmx1b genotype, we compared mutant and control mice using Fisher’s exact test, with P < 0.01 considered significant.
MicronIV and image-guided optical coherence tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) paired with the MicronIV: Retinal Imaging Microscope (Phoenix Research Labs) was used to assess the retina and optic nerve head in vivo. Mice were subject to pupillary dilation with a drop of 1% solution of cyclopentolate hydrochloride ophthalmic solution (Akorn, Inc.) that was topically applied to the cornea. Mice were anesthetized as previously described (see methods, IOP measurement). Mice were secured on a rotating stage and imaged using OCT per the manufacturer’s directions.
Data availability
Genotype data of GERA participants are available from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) under accession phs000674.v2.p2. This includes individuals who consented to having their data shared with dbGaP. The complete GERA data are available upon application to the KP Research Bank (https://researchbank.kaiserpermanente.org/). The meta-analysis GWAS summary statistics are available from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics). The genotype data and the glaucoma phenotype of UKB participants are available upon request from (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). The RNA-seq and microarray datasets utilized in the study were deposited previously on NCBI, accession number GSE90654 and GSE26299 respectively.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who have generously agreed to participate in the Kaiser Permanente Research Program on Genes, Environment, and Health. Support for participant enrollment, survey completion, and biospecimen collection for the RPGEH was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Wayne and Gladys Valley Foundation, the Ellison Medical Foundation, and Kaiser Permanente Community Benefit Programs. Genotyping of the GERA cohort was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging, National Institute of Mental Health, and National Institute of Health Common Fund (RC2 AG036607 to C.S. and N.R.). Data analyses were facilitated by National Eye Institute (NEI) grant R01 EY027004 (E.J.) and a Kaiser Permanente Community Benefit grant (E.J.). This work was also made possible in part by NIH-NEI EY002162—Core Grant for Vision Research, by the Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted Grant (UCSF, Ophthalmology). K.S.N. receives support from NEI grant EY022891, Research to Prevent Blindness William and Mary Greve Special Scholar Award, Marin Community Foundation-Kathlyn McPherson Masneri and Arno P. Masneri Fund, and That Man May See Inc. S.W.M.J. receives support from NEI grant EY011721 and he is the investigator of a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
H.C., K.S.N., and E.J. conceived and designed the study. T.J.H., M.N.K., N.R., C.S., and E.J. were involved in the genotyping and quality control. T.J.H. performed the imputation analyses. K.K.T., in collaboration with R.M., extracted phenotype data from EHRs. K.K.T. and J.Y. performed statistical analyses. Y.B. performed the ancestry principal components analyses. H.C. and J.Y. performed in silico analyses. S.P. and K.S.N. performed the functional characterization of FMNL2. S.C.K., N.G.T., K.S.N., and S.W.M.J. generated and characterized Lmx1b mutant mouse strains. P.A.W., N.G.T., and S.W.M.J. carried out the gene expression analysis in mouse glaucoma models. S.W.M.J. conceived and oversaw the mouse experiments. H.C., T.J.H., C.S., R.M., N.R., S.W.M.J., S.P., K.S.N., and E.J. interpreted the results of analyses. H.C., T.J.H., P.A.W, N.G.T., R.M., N.R., S.W.M.J., K.S.N., and E.J. contributed to the drafting and critical review of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-04555-4.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
K. Saidas Nair, Email: Saidas.Nair@ucsf.edu.
Eric Jorgenson, Email: Eric.Jorgenson@kp.org.
References
- 1.Jonas JB, et al. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017;390:2183–2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tham YC, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Anderson DR. Normal-tension glaucoma (low-tension glaucoma) Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2011;59:S97–S101. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.73695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shen L, et al. The association of refractive error with glaucoma in a multiethnic population. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Teikari JM. Genetic factors in open-angle (simple and capsular) glaucoma. A population-based twin study. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh.) 1987;65:715–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb07069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cuellar-Partida G, et al. Assessment of polygenic effects links primary open-angle glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26885. doi: 10.1038/srep26885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ge T, Chen CY, Neale BM, Sabuncu MR, Smoller JW. Phenome-wide heritability analysis of the UK Biobank. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Thorleifsson G, et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2010;42:906–909. doi: 10.1038/ng.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Burdon KP, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for open angle glaucoma at TMCO1 and CDKN2B-AS1. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:574–578. doi: 10.1038/ng.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Osman W, Low SK, Takahashi A, Kubo M, Nakamura Y. A genome-wide association study in the Japanese population confirms 9p21 and 14q23 as susceptibility loci for primary open angle glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2012;21:2836–2842. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wiggs JL, et al. Common variants at 9p21 and 8q22 are associated with increased susceptibility to optic nerve degeneration in glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen Y, et al. Common variants near ABCA1 and in PMM2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:1115–1119. doi: 10.1038/ng.3078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gharahkhani P, et al. Common variants near ABCA1, AFAP1 and GMDS confer risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:1120–1125. doi: 10.1038/ng.3079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hoffmann TJ, et al. Genome-wide association and admixture analysis of glaucoma in the Women’s Health Initiative. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014;23:6634–6643. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Z, et al. A common variant near TGFBR3 is associated with primary open angle glaucoma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:3880–3892. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Springelkamp H, et al. ARHGEF12 influences the risk of glaucoma by increasing intraocular pressure. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2015;24:2689–2699. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bailey JN, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2 and FOXC1 as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:189–194. doi: 10.1038/ng.3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Springelkamp H, et al. New insights into the genetics of primary open-angle glaucoma based on meta-analyses of intraocular pressure and optic disc characteristics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017;26:438–453. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carnes MU, et al. Discovery and functional annotation of SIX6 variants in primary open-angle glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gao S, Jakobs TC. Mice homozygous for a deletion in the glaucoma susceptibility locus INK4 show increased vulnerability of retinal ganglion cells to elevated intraocular pressure. Am. J. Pathol. 2016;186:985–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.11.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Elliott MH, et al. Caveolin-1 modulates intraocular pressure: implications for caveolae mechanoprotection in glaucoma. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:37127. doi: 10.1038/srep37127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Skowronska-Krawczyk D, et al. P16INK4a upregulation mediated by SIX6 defines retinal ganglion cell pathogenesis in glaucoma. Mol. Cell. 2015;59:931–940. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.07.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sudlow C, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yang J, et al. Genomic inflation factors under polygenic inheritance. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;19:807–812. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2011;88:76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wagner AH, et al. Exon-level expression profiling of ocular tissues. Exp. Eye Res. 2013;111:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bowes Rickman C, et al. Defining the human macula transcriptome and candidate retinal disease genes using EyeSAGE. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006;47:2305–2316. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Liu Y, et al. Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in normal human trabecular meshwork. Mol. Vis. 2011;17:885–893. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Williams PA, et al. Vitamin B3 modulates mitochondrial vulnerability and prevents glaucoma in aged mice. Science. 2017;355:756–760. doi: 10.1126/science.aal0092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Howell GR, Walton DO, King BL, Libby RT, John SW. Datgan, a reusable software system for facile interrogation and visualization of complex transcription profiling data. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:429. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Choquet H, et al. A large multi-ethnic genome-wide association study identifies novel genetic loci for intraocular pressure. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2108. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01913-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kage F, et al. FMNL formins boost lamellipodial force generation. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14832. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Block J, et al. FMNL2 drives actin-based protrusion and migration downstream of Cdc42. Curr. Biol. 2012;22:1005–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Keller KE, Acott TS. The juxtacanalicular region of ocular trabecular meshwork: a tissue with a unique extracellular matrix and specialized function. J. Ocul. Biol. 2013;1:3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rao PV, Pattabiraman PP, Kopczynski C. Role of the Rho GTPase/Rho kinase signaling pathway in pathogenesis and treatment of glaucoma: bench to bedside research. Exp. Eye Res. 2017;158:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mimiwati Z, et al. Nail-patella syndrome and its association with glaucoma: a review of eight families. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1505–1509. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sweeney E, Fryer A, Mountford R, Green A, McIntosh I. Nail patella syndrome: a review of the phenotype aided by developmental biology. J. Med. Genet. 2003;40:153–162. doi: 10.1136/jmg.40.3.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Lichter PR, et al. Cosegregation of open-angle glaucoma and the nail-patella syndrome. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1997;124:506–515. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70866-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cross SH, et al. A dominant-negative mutation of mouse Lmx1b causes glaucoma and is semi-lethal via LDB1-mediated dimerization [corrected] PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Smith RS, et al. Haploinsufficiency of the transcription factors FOXC1 and FOXC2 results in aberrant ocular development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000;9:1021–1032. doi: 10.1093/hmg/9.7.1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chang B, et al. Haploinsufficient Bmp4 ocular phenotypes include anterior segment dysgenesis with elevated intraocular pressure. BMC Genet. 2001;2:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-2-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tojkander S, Gateva G, Lappalainen P. Actin stress fibers—assembly, dynamics and biological roles. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:1855–1864. doi: 10.1242/jcs.098087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rao PV, Deng PF, Kumar J, Epstein DL. Modulation of aqueous humor outflow facility by the Rho kinase-specific inhibitor Y-27632. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001;42:1029–1037. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hoy SM. Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%: first global approval. Drugs. 2018;78:389–396. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0877-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Garnock-Jones KP. Ripasudil: first global approval. Drugs. 2014;74:2211–2215. doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0333-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burridge K, Guilluy C. Focal adhesions, stress fibers and mechanical tension. Exp. Cell Res. 2016;343:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lee YS, et al. Regulation of anterior chamber drainage by bicarbonate-sensitive soluble adenylyl cyclase in the ciliary body. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:41353–41358. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.284679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Corredor RG, et al. Soluble adenylyl cyclase activity is necessary for retinal ganglion cell survival and axon growth. J. Neurosci. 2012;32:7734–7744. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5288-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Libby RT, Gould DB, Anderson MG, John SW. Complex genetics of glaucoma susceptibility. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2005;6:15–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Howell GR, Soto I, Libby RT, John SW. Intrinsic axonal degeneration pathways are critical for glaucomatous damage. Exp. Neurol. 2013;246:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2012.01.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nakano M, et al. Three susceptible loci associated with primary open-angle glaucoma identified by genome-wide association study in a Japanese population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:12838–12842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906397106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Springelkamp H, et al. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies novel loci associated with optic disc morphology. Genet. Epidemiol. 2015;39:207–216. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ghoumid J, et al. Nail-Patella syndrome: clinical and molecular data in 55 families raising the hypothesis of a genetic heterogeneity. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2016;24:44–50. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Stein JD, et al. Differences in rates of glaucoma among Asian Americans and other racial groups, and among various Asian ethnic groups. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1031–1037. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Banda Y, et al. Characterizing race/ethnicity and genetic ancestry for 100,000 subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort. Genetics. 2015;200:1285–1295. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kvale MN, et al. Genotyping informatics and quality control for 100,000 subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort. Genetics. 2015;200:1051–1060. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hoffmann TJ, et al. Next generation genome-wide association tool: design and coverage of a high-throughput European-optimized SNP array. Genomics. 2011;98:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hoffmann TJ, et al. Design and coverage of high throughput genotyping arrays optimized for individuals of East Asian, African American, and Latino race/ethnicity using imputation and a novel hybrid SNP selection algorithm. Genomics. 2011;98:422–430. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2011.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Delaneau O, Marchini J, Zagury JF. A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:179–181. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Howie B, Fuchsberger C, Stephens M, Marchini J, Abecasis GR. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:955–959. doi: 10.1038/ng.2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marchini J, Howie B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:499–511. doi: 10.1038/nrg2796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chang CC, et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang L, Wang C, Rosenberg NA. The relationship between imputation error and statistical power in genetic association studies in diverse populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2009;85:692–698. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Price AL, et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.Rproject.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014)
- 66.Fritsche LG, et al. Seven new loci associated with age-related macular degeneration. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:433–439. doi: 10.1038/ng.2578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Loh PR, et al. Reference-based phasing using the Haplotype Reference Consortium panel. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1443–1448. doi: 10.1038/ng.3679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Das S, et al. Next-generation genotype imputation service and methods. Nat. Genet. 2016;48:1284–1287. doi: 10.1038/ng.3656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen W, et al. Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate Bayesian method using marginal test statistics. Genetics. 2015;200:719–736. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.176107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wellcome Trust Case Control C, et al. Bayesian refinement of association signals for 14 loci in 3 common diseases. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:1294–1301. doi: 10.1038/ng.2435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Libby RT, et al. Inherited glaucoma in DBA/2J mice: pertinent disease features for studying the neurodegeneration. Vis. Neurosci. 2005;22:637–648. doi: 10.1017/S0952523805225130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Anderson MG, et al. Mutations in genes encoding melanosomal proteins cause pigmentary glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:81–85. doi: 10.1038/ng794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pang IH, Shade DL, Clark AF, Steely HT, DeSantis L. Preliminary characterization of a transformed cell strain derived from human trabecular meshwork. Curr. Eye Res. 1994;13:51–63. doi: 10.3109/02713689409042398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Savinova OV, et al. Intraocular pressure in genetically distinct mice: an update and strain survey. BMC Genet. 2001;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.John SW, et al. Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2J mice. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1998;39:951–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Anderson MG, Libby RT, Gould DB, Smith RS, John SW. High-dose radiation with bone marrow transfer prevents neurodegeneration in an inherited glaucoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:4566–4571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407357102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Genotype data of GERA participants are available from the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP) under accession phs000674.v2.p2. This includes individuals who consented to having their data shared with dbGaP. The complete GERA data are available upon application to the KP Research Bank (https://researchbank.kaiserpermanente.org/). The meta-analysis GWAS summary statistics are available from the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics). The genotype data and the glaucoma phenotype of UKB participants are available upon request from (www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). The RNA-seq and microarray datasets utilized in the study were deposited previously on NCBI, accession number GSE90654 and GSE26299 respectively.