Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 11;8:8811. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27081-1

The guanine nucleotide exchange factor Arhgef7/βPix promotes axon formation upstream of TC10

Alejandro López Tobón 1,2,3,4, Megalakshmi Suresh 1,2, Jing Jin 1,2, Alessandro Vitriolo 3,4, Thorben Pietralla 1, Kerry Tedford 5, Michael Bossenz 5, Kristina Mahnken 1, Friedemann Kiefer 2,6,7, Giuseppe Testa 3,4, Klaus-Dieter Fischer 5, Andreas W Püschel 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC5995858  PMID: 29891904

Abstract

The characteristic six layers of the mammalian neocortex develop sequentially as neurons are generated by neural progenitors and subsequently migrate past older neurons to their final position in the cortical plate. One of the earliest steps of neuronal differentiation is the formation of an axon. Small GTPases play essential roles during this process by regulating cytoskeletal dynamics and intracellular trafficking. While the function of GTPases has been studied extensively in cultured neurons and in vivo much less is known about their upstream regulators. Here we show that Arhgef7 (also called βPix or Cool1) is essential for axon formation during cortical development. The loss of Arhgef7 results in an extensive loss of axons in cultured neurons and in the developing cortex. Arhgef7 is a guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Cdc42, a GTPase that has a central role in directing the formation of axons during brain development. However, active Cdc42 was not able to rescue the knockdown of Arhgef7. We show that Arhgef7 interacts with the GTPase TC10 that is closely related to Cdc42. Expression of active TC10 can restore the ability to extend axons in Arhgef7-deficient neurons. Our results identify an essential role of Arhgef7 during neuronal development that promotes axon formation upstream of TC10.

Introduction

The characteristic six-layered structure of the mammalian neocortex arises by the sequential generation of neurons from neural progenitors located in the ventricular (VZ) and subventricular zone (SVZ) of the embryonic cortex and their subsequent radial migration into the cortical plate1. When they move from the VZ/SVZ into the intermediate zone, the newborn neurons initially have a multipolar morphology with several dynamic neurites1. After forming an axon and a leading process, neurons become bipolar and migrate into the cortical plate. A similar process can be observed in cultures of neurons from the embryonic brain2. Initially unpolarized neurons attach to the culture substrate (stage 1) and extend several neurites (stage 2). Neurons polarize by selecting one of these undifferentiated neurites as the axon (stage 3), which undergoes a rapid extension and acquires axon-specific markers.

Small GTPases play a crucial role during the transition from a multipolar to a bipolar morphology and the formation of axons1,3,4. Their activity is regulated by GEFs and GTPase activating proteins. The Rap1 GTPases are central regulators of the multi-to-bipolar transition5. They act upstream of Rho family GTPases like Cdc42 that is essential for the establishment of neuronal polarity and axon formation6,7. A knockout of Cdc42 results in an almost complete loss of axons in the cortex. Cdc42 directly regulates actin dynamics through cofilin6. The Par3/Par6 complex in addition couples Cdc42 to the GEFs Tiam1 and Tiam2/Stef that promote axon growth by activating Rac2. Despite its central role for neuronal development and axon formation, very little is known about the GEFs that regulate Cdc42 during neuronal differentiation.

The Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 7 (Arhgef7) also called βPix (Pax-interacting exchange factor beta) or Cool1 (Cloned out of library 1) and the closely related Arhgef6 (αPix) belong to the Dbl family of Rho GEFs. They contain a DH-PH (DBL and plekstrin homology) domain and activate Rac1 and Cdc428–14. While a knockout of Arhgef6 is viable and shows defects in the immune system, the knockout of Arhgef7 is embryonically lethal at early stages of development precluding an analysis of its function in the nervous system15,16. In addition to the DH-PH domain that is responsible for its GEF activity, Arhgef7 also contains a CH (calponin homology) and an SH3 (Src homology 3) domain at the N-terminus and proline-rich, GIT1-binding and coiled coil (CC) domains at the C-terminus (Fig. 1a)11,14,17,18. These domains mediate the interaction with multiple binding partners that include p21 activated kinases (Paks), Git1 (G-protein-coupled receptor-interacting protein 1), and Scribble11,14,19,20. Arhgef7 has been implicated in multiple processes including the regulation of focal adhesion maturation, actin dynamics, the remodeling and trafficking of membranes and exocytosis11–14,18,19,21–27.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Expression of Arhgef7 in neurons. (a) A schematic representation of the Arhgef7 domain structure and the major isoforms is shown. DH: DBL homology domain, PH: plekstrin homology domain, CH: calponin homology domain, SH3: Src homology 3 domain, GBD: Git binding domain, CC: Coiled coil domain. (b) The expression of Arhgef7 in the cortex of E17 mouse embryos and postnatal mice (P0 or P2) was analyzed by Western blot (WB) using an anti-Arhgef7 antibody. The loading of comparable amounts of proteins was verified using and anti-actin antibody. Molecular weights are indicated in kDa. (c) Hippocampal neurons from E18 rat embryos were analyzed at 24 h (stage 2) or 72 h (stage 3) of culture by staining with an anti-Arhgef7 (green), the Tuji 1 or Tau-1 (red) antibodies and CellTracker Blue CMAC (blue) as a volume marker. The scale bars are 20 μm and 2 (upper panel) or 5 μm (lower panels), respectively.

In the nervous system, Arhgef7 acts as regulator of dendrite branching, the formation of dendritic spines28–31 and synaptic structure and function14,32–35. Arhgef7 is localized to presynaptic sites and the postsynaptic density by its interaction with Scribble, Git1/2 and Shank (SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains) proteins, respectively19,35–37. Arhgef7 regulates actin polymerization by interacting with N-WASP, Pak1 and Rac29,31,35. Thereby Arhgef7 promotes the clustering of synaptic vesicles at synapses and maintains the surface levels of GABAA receptors at inhibitory synapses34,35. Arhgef7 has also been linked to Ca2+-dependent exocytosis and neurotransmitter release19,25,38,39.

Much less is known about the function of Arhgef7 in axon formation. The interaction between Paks and Arhgef7 regulates the actin cytoskeleton in growth cones40,41. Knockdown experiments in polarized hippocampal neurons revealed a role of Arhgef6 but not Argef7 in axon branching42. Here we show that Arhgef7 is essential at early stages of neuronal polarization for axon formation. Arhgef7-deficient neurons are unable to extend an axon in culture and in the developing cortex. The loss of axons can be rescued by the expression of active TC10 but not Cdc42. Our results indicate that Arhgef7 plays an important role in axon formation acting upstream of TC10.

Results

Arhgef7 is required for axon formation

To identify GEFs that are required for axon formation we analyzed the function of Arhgef7 during neuronal differentiation. Arhgef7 is expressed in the embryonic brain and its expression increases postnatally42 (Fig. 1b). Multiple Arhgef7 isoforms have been described that differ by the presence of the N-terminal CH domain and alternative C-termini18,43–46. In the embryonic brain, the largest isoform with a molecular of approximately 100 kDa predominates (Fig. 1a,b), which probably corresponds to an Arhgef7 variant with a CH domain18,42. With the increased postnatal expression of Arhgef7 several shorter variants become more prominent with an isoform of approximately 90 kDa being the most strongly expressed one. Staining of cultured neurons from the hippocampus of E18 rat embryos showed that Arhgef7 is present in the soma and at the tip all neurites of unpolarized stage 2 neurons. Upon neuronal polarization it becomes enriched in the axonal growth cone at stage 3 but is present also in the minor neurites (Fig. 1c).

To investigate if Arhgef7 is involved in axon formation, we performed knockdown experiments with cultured hippocampal neurons using an shRNA that targets all Arhgef7 isoforms. The efficiency of the shRNA construct was verified by Western blot after co-expression with HA-Arhgef7 in HEK 293T cells and by immunofluorescence after transfection of neurons (Fig. 2a,e). Hippocampal neurons were transfected at 3, 6 and 24 h after plating with the shRNA vector and analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by staining with the Tau-1 antibody as axonal and an anti-MAP2 as dendritic marker (Fig. 2a–d). Knockdown of Arhgef7 resulted in an increase in the number of unpolarized neurons from 9 ± 2% in controls to 44 ± 4% after transfection at 3 h (Fig. 2b). Transfection of neurons at 6 h after plating showed a similar result (Fig. 2b,c; control: 14 ± 2% unpolarized neurons, Arhgef7 knockdown: 41 ± 2%). However, no significant effect was observed when neurons were transfected at 24 h after plating (21 ± 4% unpolarized neurons) (Fig. 1d). This indicates that Arhgef7 is required for axon formation and that its function is restricted to early stages of neuronal polarization. This requirement for an early knockdown is consistent with previous studies that did not report defects in axon formation when neurons were transfected after they were already polarized42. In order to confirm the specificity of the Arhgef7 knockdown phenotype, we performed rescue experiments with an RNAi-resistant Arhgef7 expression construct (Arhgef7-res) (Fig. 2e–g). The number of unpolarized neurons was increased from 8 ± 3% in controls to 39 ± 4% after expression of the shRNA against Arhgef7 (Fig. 2f,g; n = 3, p < 0.01). After expression of Arhgef7-res together with the shRNA, the number of polarized neurons with a single axon increased from 52 ± 5% after knockdown of Arhgef7 to 71 ± 3% comparable to the value for controls (87 ± 4%, Fig. 2f,g). Expression of Arhgef7 alone did not affect axon formation (neurons with a single axon: 71 ± 2%). These results confirm the specificity of the shRNA directed against Arhgef7. Taken together, our results show that Arhgef7 is required for axon formation.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Arhgef7 is required for axon formation. (a) Hippocampal neurons were transfected at 6 h with a control vector or vectors for an shRNA against Arhgef7 (Arhgef7 RNAi) and GFP (green) and analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by staining with an anti-Arhgef7 antibody (red). The knockdown results in a loss of Arhgef7 immunoreactivity. (b–d) Hippocampal neurons were transfected with a control vector or a vector for an shRNA against Arhgef7 (Arhgef7 RNAi) and GFP (green) at 3 (a), 6 (b) or 24 h (c) after platting. The formation of axons was analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by counting the number neurons without an axon (0, black) with a single axon (1, gray), and with multiple axons (>1, white) (Student’s t-Test **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.005 compared to control); at least 50 neurons were counted for each condition (n = 4). (e) HEK 293T cells were transfected with a vector for HA-Arhgef7 or RNAi-resistant HA-Arhgef7-res and control vector or a vector for an shRNA directed against Arhgef7, which also express GFP. The expression of Arhgef7 and GFP was analyzed by Western blot (WB) using antibodies against HA and GFP. The molecular weight is indicated in kDa. (f,g) Hippocampal neurons were transfected with a control vector or a vector for an shRNA against Arhgef7 (RNAi) and GFP (control) or RNAi-resistant HA-Arhgef7-res (A7r) as indicated. The formation of axons was analyzed was analyzed by counting the number neurons without an axon (0, black) with a single axon (1, gray), and with multiple axons (>1, white) (ANOVA, Student’s t-Test, ***p < 0.005, n = 3 with at least 50 neurons counted per condition; **p < 0.01, n = 3). The scale bar is 20 μm.

Arhgef7 is required for axon formation in vivo

To address the question if Arhgef7 is required for axon formation also in vivo we analyzed the phenotype of a conditional Arhgef7 knockout. Since a complete knockout of Arhgef7 is embryonically lethal15 we generated a cortex-specific knockout using a conditional Arhgef7 allele (Arhgef7flox; Suppl. Fig. S1) and the Emx1-Cre line, which mediates the deletion in the dorsal telencephalon from E10.5 onwards47,48. Western blots confirmed the loss of Arhgef7 in the embryonic cortex of homozygous E17.5 Arhgef7flox/flox; Emx1Cre/+ knockout mice (called Arhgef7-cKO hereafter) (Fig. 3a). We cultured cortical neurons from homozygous or heterozygous (Arhgef7flox/+; Emx1Cre/+) E17.5 Arhgef7-cKO embryos and analyzed axon formation at 3 d.i.v. by staining with an antibody specific for Arhgef7 and markers for axons (Tau-1) and dendrites (MAP2) (Fig. 3b,c). Cortical neurons from knockout embryos showed an almost complete loss of Arhgef7 expression (Fig. 3b). 75 + 5% of the neurons from homozygous Arhgef7-cKO embryos were unpolarized and did not extend a Tau-1 positive axon compared to 17 ± 3% in cultures from heterozygous embryos (Fig. 3c).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Arhgef7 is required for axon formation in the cortex. (a) The expression of Arhgef7 in the cortex from Arhgef7fl/+; Emx1Cre/+ (+/−) or Arhgef7fl/fl; Emx1Cre/+ (−/−) E17.5 embryos was analyzed by Western blot. Analysis of GAPDH expression confirmed that the loading of comparable amounts of protein. Numbers indicate the molecular weight in kDa. (b) Cultured neurons from the cortex of Arhgef7fl/+; Emx1Cre/+ (+/−) or Arhgef7fl/fl; Emx1Cre/+ (−/−) E17.5 embryos were stained at 3 d.i.v. (stage 3) with an anti-Arhgef7 (green), an anti-MAP2 (red) and the Tau-1 (blue) antibody. (c) The formation of axons was analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by counting the number neurons without an axon (0, black) with a single axon (1, gray), and with multiple axons (>1, white). (ANOVA, Student’s t-Test, ***p < 0.005, n = 3 with at least 50 neurons counted per experiment). The scale bar is 20 μm. (d) Coronal sections from the brains of E17 Arhgef7fl/fl; Emx1Cre/+ (Arhgef7−/−) or Arhgef7fl/+; Emx1Cre/+ (Arhgef7+/−) mouse embryos were stained with antibodies specific for the neurofilament medium chain (NF, green) and a nuclear marker (Hoechst 33342, blue). The scale bar is 100 μm.

To analyze axon formation in the developing brain, sections from homozygous and heterozygous E17 Arhgef7-cKO embryos were stained with an antibody for neurofilament intermediate chain as axonal marker. The staining revealed a severe loss of axons in the IZ, as well as in the hippocampus (Fig. 3d). The corpus callosum was severely reduced (Suppl. Fig. S2). These results show that Arhgef7 is required for axon formation during cortical and hippocampal development.

Arhgef7 acts upstream of TC10 during axon specification

The role of Arhgef7 in axon development could be mediated by its function as a GEF for Cdc42 that is crucial for axon specification6,7,9,10. Therefore, we tested if active Cdc42 is able to rescue the loss of Arhgef7. For these rescue experiments we used a fast cycling Cdc42 mutant (Cdc42 F28L) because constitutively active Cdc42 G12V blocks neurite extension7. The expression of Cdc42 F28L at moderate levels slightly increased the number of neurons with multiple axons from 10 ± 1% in controls to 26 ± 5% (Fig. 4a,b, p < 0.05) as previously described7. However, the expression of Cdc42 F28L was not able to significantly reduce the number of unpolarized neurons after knockdown of Arhgef7 (control: 10 ± 2%, Arhgef7 shRNA: 38 ± 3%, Arhgef7 shRNA + Cdc42 F28L: 34 ± 4% unpolarized neurons, n = 3, p = 0.64; Fig. 4b). Thus, active Cdc42 is not able to rescue the loss of Arhgef7 during axon formation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Active Cdc42 is not able to rescue the loss of Arhgef7. (a) Dissociated hippocampal neurons were transfected 6 h after plating with expression vectors for an shRNA against Arhgef7 (Arhgef7 RNAi) and GFP-Cdc42F28L or GFP (green). Neurons were analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by staining with an anti-MAP2 (red, dendrites) and the Tau-1 (blue, axons) antibody. The scale bar is 20 μm. (b) The formation of axons was analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by counting the number neurons without an axon (0, black) with a single axon (1, gray), and with multiple axons (>1, white) (ANOVA, Student’s t-Test, *p < 0.05, compared to controls, n.s is non significant for the indicated comparison, n = 3 experiments with at least 50 neurons counted per condition).

The GTPase TC10 is a close relative of Cdc42 (82% amino acid sequence similarity), and previous studies have shown that it is an important regulator of axon formation49,50. To investigate whether Arhgef7 acts through TC10, we first tested if they interact biochemically. Pull-down assays with bacterially expressed GST-TC10 and HA-Arhgef7 expressed in HEK 293T cells showed that Arhgef7 binds to TC10 (Fig. 5a). To delineate the Arhgef7 domain that interacts with TC10 we performed pull-down assays with GFP-fusion proteins for different Arhgef7 domains expressed in HEK 293T cells (Fig. 5b,c). While full-length Arhgef7 and the DH-PH domain bound TC10 neither the CH nor the combined CH and SH3 domains showed a detectable interaction with TC10 (Fig. 5c). We could not test the C-terminal domain of Arhgef7 because of its poor expression.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Arhgef7 interacts with TC10. (a) Bacterially expressed GST-TC10 was coupled to glutathione-sepharose beads and incubated with lysates of HEK 293T cells transfected with the expression vector for HA-Arhgef7. Bound Arhgef7 was analyzed by Western blot using an anti-HA antibody. The expression of comparable amounts of GST proteins was visualized by Coomassie blue staining. (b) Schematic representation of Arhgef7 domains expressed as GFP fusion proteins that were used for pull-down experiments. (c) Bacterially expressed GST or GST-TC10 was coupled to glutathione-sepharose beads and incubated with lysates of HEK 293T cells transfected with the expression vectors for GFP-Arhgef7, or GFP-fusion proteins for the CH, CH-SH3 of DH-PH domains as indicated. Bound GFP-fusion proteins and the expression of comparable amounts of protein was analyzed by Western blot using an anti-GFP antibody or Coomassie blue staining. Molecular weights are indicated in kDa. (d) Homology models obtained for a complex between Arhgef7 (cyan) and TC10 (green) are shown with Arhgef7 depicted in cyan and TC10 in green. Putative polar interactions between Arhgef7 and TC10 are represented by broken yellow lines connecting alpha-carbon atoms of each residue. (e) Bacterially expressed GST or GST-PBD that specifically binds active TC10 was coupled to glutathione-sepharose beads and incubated with lysates of HEK 293T cells transfected with the expression vectors for GFP-TC10 or GFP and HA-Arhgef7 (+) or pcDNA3.1-HA (−) in the presence (+) or absence (−) of a phosphatase inhibitor as indicated. Bound TC10 and the expression of comparable amounts of protein were analyzed by Western blot using anti-HA and anti-GFP antibodies or Coomassie Blue staining. Molecular weights are indicated in kDa.

The interaction between the DH-PH domain of Arghef7 and TC10 suggests that Arhgef7 acts as a GEF for TC10. Since a structure is not available for Arhgef7 we modeled its DH-PH domain based on that of P-Rex1 (phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate dependent Rac exchange factor 1) as a template51,52. The Rac GEF P-Rex1 is the closest homolog based on amino acid sequence similarity for which a high-resolution structure of a complex between the DH-PH domain and a GTPase is available. All-atom structural models were derived by molecular modeling for the complex of the Arhgef7 DH-PH domain with Rac1, Cdc42 and TC10 (Fig. 5d, Suppl. Fig. S3). These models served to estimate the binding energies for the complexes that were derived. The models yielded a comparable strength of binding between the Arhgef7 DH-PH domain and Cdc42 (estimated binding free energy (ΔG): −67.6 kCal/Mol) or TC10 (−75.2 kCal/Mol) and a slightly lower value for the complex with Rac1 (−44.2 kCal/Mol). These results indicate a high affinity for the interaction between Arhgef7 and TC10. The modeling of the complex between the Arhgef7 DH-PH domain and TC10 suggests the presence of a strong hydrophobic contribution (Suppl. Fig. S4a) coupled with a salt-bridge (Asp71:TC10-Lys275:Arhgef7) and several polar interaction between residues on the interface between the two proteins (Phe43, Tyr62,Arg72 on TC10 and Lys234,Gln271,Arg274 on Arhgef7, Fig. 5e). To investigate the contribution of the potential salt-bridge, we tested the interaction of two TC10 mutants (TC10 D71A, TC10 D71K) with Arhgef7 (Suppl. Fig. S4b). Both mutations reduced the binding modestly but did not abolish it indicating that additional residues make important contributions to the interaction with Arhgef7. Our biochemical characterization together with the free energy values and the 3D reconstruction supports the possibility of an interaction between the DH-PH domain of Arhgef7 and TC10.

In order to test whether Arhgef7 can activate TC10, we transfected HEK 293T cells with expression vectors for TC10 and HA-Arhgef7 and determined the amount of active TC10 using a pull-down assay with the GTPase-binding domain (PBD) from PAK1 (GST-PBD) that binds active TC1053,54. Cdc42 was used as a positive control (Suppl. Fig. S5). While little active TC10 was detectable without co-expression of a GEF, a strong signal was apparent upon co-expression with Arhgef7 (Fig. 5e). The addition of a phosphatase inhibitor increased the amount of active TC10 consistent with reports that Arhgef7 activity is regulated by phosphorylation10,31,55. These results show that the co-expression of Arhgef7 increased the amount of GTP-bound TC10 indicating that it acts upstream of it.

To investigate whether Arhgef7 indeed acts upstream of TC10 to promote axon formation, we tested if active TC10 is able to rescue the loss of Arhgef7. Expression of constitutively active TC10 Q67L completely blocked neurite extension (data not shown) similar to Cdc42 G12V7. Therefore, we used the fast cycling mutant TC10 F34L for rescue experiments with hippocampal neurons56. Neurons were transfected with vectors for the shRNA against Arhgef7 and TC10 F34L and analyzed axon formation at 3 d.i.v. (Fig. 6a,b). Expression of low levels of TC10 F34L slightly increased the number of neurons with multiple axons (32 ± 6%). Co-expression of TC10 F34L together with the shRNA directed against Arhgef7 rescued the loss of axons and reduced the number of unpolarized neurons from 44.1 ± 3% after knockdown of Arhgef7 to 19 ± 3%, which is comparable to the 14 ± 3% in controls (Fig. 6b). Thus TC10 F34L is able to restore the ability to extend axons in Arhgef7-deficient neurons. These results indicate that TC10 acts downstream of Arhgef7 to promote axon formation.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Active TC10 rescues the loss of axons caused in Arhgef7-deficient neurons. (a) Dissociated hippocampal neurons were transfected at 6 h after plating with expression vectors for an shRNA against Arhgef7 (Arhgef7 RNAi) and GFP-TC10F34L or GFP (green). Transfected neurons were analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by staining with an anti-MAP2 (red, dendrites) and the Tau-1 (blue, axons) antibody. The scale bar is 20 μm. (b) The formation of axons was analyzed at 3 d.i.v. by counting the number neurons without an axon (0, black) with a single axon (1, gray), and with multiple axons (>1, white) (ANOVA, Student’s t-Test, **p < 0.01, n = 3 experiments with 50 neurons counted per condition).

Discussion

Here we show that Arhgef7 is essential for the formation of axons. Its inactivation in cultured neurons as well as in the developing cortex results in an extensive loss of axons. This phenotype can be rescued by the expression of active TC10 in cultured neurons but not by active Cdc42 indicating that Arhgef7 acts upstream of TC10 to promote axon formation. Our results identify a new GEF that is essential for axon extension acting through a novel pathway.

Arhgef7 has been shown to regulate dendrite branching, the formation of dendritic spines and synaptic structure and function but no defects in axon formation had been described28–35,42. The transfection of neurons at different time points of culture showed that Arhgef7 function is required for axon extension early during neuronal polarization while a knockdown after 24 h of culture does not lead to a loss of axons. This result indicates that the function in axon formation has not been observed before because the loss of Arhgef7 was induced after this critical period in previous studies42.

Arhgef7 has been shown to act as a GEF for Cdc42 that is a central regulator of neuronal polarity6. A conditional knockout of Cdc42 results in an almost complete loss of axons in the cortex similar to the Arhgef7 knockout6. However, active Cdc42 F28L was not able to restore the ability to form axons in Arhgef7-deficient neurons while it can rescue the knockdown of Rap17. By contrast, expression of TC10 F34L rescued the loss of axons after knockdown of Arhgef7. TC10 is closely related to Cdc42 and is required for axon formation49,53,57. We show that Arhgef7 interacts with TC10 and increases the amount of GTP-bound TC10 after heterologous expression. Molecular modeling of the complex between the DH-PH domain and TC10 suggests that the binding free energy of this interaction is comparable to that of Cdc42. Taken together, these results indicate that Arhgef7 acts upstream of TC10 to activate it.

Several TC10 effectors are known that could mediate its function in axon formation. These include Par6, Pak1, N-WASP and Exo701,53,58–60. Arhgef7 has been implicated so far mainly in the regulation of the actin cytoskeleton42,58. In addition to changes in cytoskeletal dynamics, the expansion of the plasma membrane (PM) by the insertion of specialized vesicles is essential for axon formation61,62. The exocytosis of these specialized plasmalemmal precursor vesicles (PPVs) in the growth cone requires the exocyst complex, a conserved octameric complex that mediates the tethering of vesicles at the PM prior to their fusion49,63. The exocyst complex is localized to the PM by the Exo70 and Sec3 subunits. Exo70 interacts with active TC10 that recruits it to the PM50,63,64. Insulin-like growth factor (Igf1) induces the TC10-dependent recruitment of the exocyst complex and PPVs to the PM to promote axon growth49,50,61,62,65,66. The knockdown of TC10 or Exo70 impairs the polarized insertion of PPVs in the growth cone and prevents formation of axons in cultured hippocampal neurons49.

TC10 also interacts with Par6 that forms a complex with Par3 and aPKC1,60,67. Interestingly, the Par complex has been linked to exocyst function by the interaction of Par6 with the exocyst subunit Exo8468 and Par3 with Exo7069. A function in regulating membrane expansion through the exocyst complex would be consistent with previous studies that implicate Arhgef7 in the regulation membrane trafficking and exocytosis in different cell types18,19,21,22,25,26,38,55,70. Taken together our results identify a novel signaling pathway that promotes axon formation through Arhgef7 and TC10. Arhgef7 may act not only by regulating actin dynamics but also membrane expansion through TC10 and the exocyst complex. Future studies will identify the precise molecular mechanism that determines which downstream target mediates the multiple functions of Arhgef7.

Materials and Methods

Antibodies

For Western blots, the following antibodies were used: rabbit anti-Arhgef7 (Cell Signaling, #4515, 1:500), rabbit anti-Arhgef7 (Millipore, #07-1450, 1:500), mouse anti-GFP (antibodies inc. 75–131, 1:1000), rabbit anti-GAPDH (Sigma, #G9545, 1:1000), anti-HA (Roche, #1867423, 1:500). For immunofluorescence, we used anti-Arhgef7 (Millipore, #07-1450, 1:200), rabbit anti-NF medium chain (Abcam #ab64300, 1:200), mouse Tau-1 (Chemicon #MAB3420; 1:500), mouse anti-MAP2 (Chemicon #AB5622; 1:1000), Tuj 1 (R&D Systems #MAB1195, 1:1000), and goat secondary antibodies labeled with Alexa 488 or 594 (Molecular Probes). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular probes #C2110, 1:6000). CellTracker Blue CMAC (Molecular Probes, 1:1000 of 10 mM solution) was used as a cell volume marker.

Plasmids

The Arhgef7 expression vectors were generated from mKIAA0142 (corresponding to NM_001113517.1) by amplifying the coding sequence by PCR and cloning it into the pEGFP-C1 (Clontech) or pcDNA3.1-HA (Invitrogen) vectors. The sequences encoding the different Arhgef7 domains were amplified by PCR and cloned into the pEGFP-C2 vector. The vectors for Cdc42 F28L and pGST-PBD have been described previously7,8,54. The coding sequence for mouse TC10 was amplified by PCR and cloned into pGEX4-T2 and pEGFP-N1. The fast cycling mutant TC10 F34L7,56 was generated by site directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) with the primers 5′-AACGACGCCT TACCCGAGG AGTACG-3′ and 5′-TCCTCGGGTA AGGCGTCGTT GGC-3′. To generate an shRNA vector directed against Arhgef7 (Arhgef7 RNAi) an shRNA with the target sequence 5′-AGGGAGTGAG GGAGAGAACG-3′ was cloned into the Xho I and Eco RI sites of the pCAGGS-U6 vector71. An RNAi-resistant Arhgef7 vector was created by introducing 2 synonymous mutations into the binding site for the shRNA in Arhgef7 (Arhgef7-res) by site directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the primers 5′-GGTTTCATCT ATCAGGGAAA GCTGCCGACA ACGGGAATG-3′ and 5′-TGTGATTGTC ATTCCCGTTG TCGGCAGCTT TCCCTGATA-3′.

Culture of primary cortical and hippocampal neurons

Dissociated cortical and hippocampal neurons from embryonic day 18 (E18) rat or E17 mouse embryos were prepared and transfected by calcium phosphate co-precipitation as described previously5,71. Neurons were plated at 70,000 cells per well in a 24-well plate coated with poly-L ornithine in Neurobasal medium (Life Technologies) and cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The culture medium was replaced by 400 μl Opti-MEM (Life Technologies) before the DNA/ CaCl2 mixture was added. After incubation for 45 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2 the neurons were washed for 15 min with 1 ml opti-MEM, which had been pre-incubated at 37 °C and 10% CO2, and Neurobasal medium was added back to the cells.

Arhgef7 conditional knockout mouse

After screening a mouse genomic library (129/Sv, RZPD Center, Berlin) with an Arhgef 7 cDNA, a targeting vector for a conditional knockout was constructed by flanking exon 4 with loxP sites (Suppl. Fig. S1). R1 (129/Sv) ES cells were electroporated with the targeting construct and a knockout line was generated by blastocyst injection of validated ES cells. After crossing to a C57/B6L FLPo-deleter mouse line72 to remove the selection cassette mice were backcrossed to the C57BL/6 J background for more then 10 generations. Emx1-Cre mice47 were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine) and crossed with Arhgef7flox/+ mice. Arhgef7flox/+; Emx1Cre/Cre mice were crossed with Arhgef7flox/flox animals to obtain heterozygous (Arhgef7flox/+; Emx1Cre/+) and homozygous knockout mice (Arhgef7flox/flox; Emx1Cre/+). All mouse strains were maintained in a C57Bl/6 background. Genotyping was done by PCR using the following primers.: 5′-AGGGAGTGAG GGAGAGAACG-3′ and 5′-GTCAGACTGCAACCCAGGAG-3′ for Arhgef7 and 5′-AAGGTGTGGT TCCAGAATCG-3′, 5′-CTCTCCACCA GAAGGCTGAG-3′, 5′-GCGGTCTGGC AGTAAAAACT ATC-3′ and 5′-GTGAAACAGC ATTGCTGTCA CTT-3′ for Emx1. Mice were housed at four to five per cage with a 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on from 07:00 to 19:00 h) at constant temperature (23 °C) with ad libitum access to food and water. All animal protocols were carried out in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and approved by the Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz Nordrhein-Westfalen.

Immunofluorescence staining of neuronal cultures

Primary cultures of dissociated hippocampal neurons were fixed at 3 days in vitro (d.i.v.) with 4% paraformaldehyde/15% sucrose in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.01% Triton X-100/0.1% Na-Citrate/PBS for 10 min on ice and stained with primary and secondary antibodies in 10% NGS/PBS. A Zeiss LSM 700 or LSM 800 confocal laser scanning microscope was used for imaging. Image analysis was done using ImageJ 1.45 s (NIH), and Adobe Photoshop CS5. The stage of neuronal differentiation was determined as described previously5.

Biochemistry

The transfection of HEK 293T cells using the calcium phosphate co-precipitation method, pull-down assays, immunoprecipitation and Western blots were performed as described previously73. Transfected HEK 293T cells were lysed in TLB lysis buffer (Tris/HCl 50 mM, pH 7,4, NaCl 150 mM, DTT 1 mM, MgCl2 1,5 mM, EDTA 4 mM, Glycerol 10% (v/v), Triton X-100 1% (v/v), cOmplete protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) at 4 °C for 30 min. The cell lysate was incubated with antibody at 4 °C for 4 h or overnight and bound proteins precipitated with protein G agarose beads (ThermoFischer Scientific). Bound proteins were eluted with 2x SDS sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot. To determine the amount of active TC10 pull-down assay were performed with the GTPase-binding domain (PBD) from PAK3 (GST-PBD)8,53,54. GST fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 cells and coupled to glutathione sepharose beads (GE Healthcare). The beads were incubated with lysates of transfected HEK 293T293T cells the bound proteins were eluted with 2x SDS sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot.

For the detection of endogenous proteins, cortices were dissected from mouse embryos at E17. The brains were homogenized in ice-cold modified RIPA buffer (1% IGEPAL, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1.5 mM MgCl2, cOmplete protease inhibitor (Sigma-Aldrich) using a glass homogenizer. After incubation for 30 min at 4 °C, the insoluble material was pelleted by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. Western blot analysis was performed using horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies and the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Uptima, Interchim UP99619A) using the Image Reader LAS-1000 system (Fujifilm).

Molecular Modeling

Protein structures were downloaded from the Protein Data Bank (PDB, www.rcsb.org). Homology modeling was done using Modeller v 9.1874, setting MD refinement to “refine.slow” and leaving the remaining parameters at default. Sequence alignment was performed using Clustal Omega75. Only the PH-DH domain of the GEFs were modeled due to the absence of high quality structures for the remaining protein domains, the function of the PH-DH domains as the catalytic domain of GEFs and to simplify the model in terms of calculation complexity. Given the high conservation of amino acid sequences between the human and murine orthologs and the scarcity of available high-resolution structures of murine GTPase/GEF complexes, the structure for the human protein (PDB: 4YON) was used as template. The structures were modeled for the human amino acid sequences. Potential energy minimization was performed on each GTPase/GEF complex structure with GROMACS 4.6 through a multi-step conjugate gradient algorithm using Amber9976 as force field. A first minimization was performed fixing all atoms of the GEFs counterpart but those at a close distance (4.5 A) from the GTPase subunit, which was not fixed. The minimization procedure automatically stopped when the resulting structure reached an RMSD threshold of 0.05. A second minimization was performed unfixing all atoms, using the same force field and RMSD threshold. Estimates of the Free Energy of binding of each complex was measured using autodockVina77.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were done using the GraphPad Prism 6.0 software. Statistical significance was calculated for at least three independent experiments using one-way ANOVA, and Student’s t-Test for parametric and Kruskall-Wallis for non-parametric data sets. Significance was defined as: p > 0.05, ns; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Data availability statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Figures S1 - S13 (2.9MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Maria Wenning and Ina Kowsky for technical assistance and Ludmila Kremer and Nannette Rink for expert support with assisted reproductive technologies. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003 - CiM; A.W.P.) and the Collaborative Research Center 629 (SFB 629; F.K.), the European Research Council (ERC) grant DISEASEAVATARS 616441 (G.T.), the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Corrente Grant, G.T.), the Fondazione IEO-CCM (fellowship to A.V.), and the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) (fellowship to A.L.T.). We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Münster.

Author Contributions

A.L.T., M.S., J.J., T.P. and K.M. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. K.T., M.B., F.K. and K.D.F. generated the conditional knockout. A.L.T., A.V. and G.T. designed and performed the molecular modeling. A.L.T. and A.W.P. conceived the experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-27081-1.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Namba T, et al. Extracellular and Intracellular Signaling for Neuronal Polarity. Physiol Rev. 2015;95:995–1024. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00025.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schelski, M. & Bradke, F. Neuronal polarization: From spatiotemporal signaling to cytoskeletal dynamics. Mol Cell Neurosci84, 11–28 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 3.Shah B, Püschel AW. In vivo functions of small GTPases in neocortical development. Biol Chem. 2014;395:465–476. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2013-0277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shah, B. & Puschel, A. W. Regulation of Rap GTPases in mammalian neurons. Biol Chem 397, 1055–1069 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Shah B, et al. Rap1 GTPases Are Master Regulators of Neural Cell Polarity in the Developing Neocortex. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1253–1269. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Garvalov BK, et al. Cdc42 regulates cofilin during the establishment of neuronal polarity. J Neurosci. 2007;27:13117–13129. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3322-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Schwamborn JC, Püschel AW. The sequential activity of the GTPases Rap1B and Cdc42 determines neuronal polarity. Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:923–929. doi: 10.1038/nn1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bagrodia S, Taylor SJ, Jordon KA, Van Aelst L, Cerione RA. A novel regulator of p21-activated kinases. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:23633–23636. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.37.23633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feng Q, Baird D, Cerione RA. Novel regulatory mechanisms for the Dbl family guanine nucleotide exchange factor Cool-2/alpha-Pix. EMBO J. 2004;23:3492–3504. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Feng Q, et al. Cool-1 functions as an essential regulatory node for EGF receptor- and Src-mediated cell growth. Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8:945–956. doi: 10.1038/ncb1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Manser E, et al. PAK kinases are directly coupled to the PIX family of nucleotide exchange factors. Mol Cell. 1998;1:183–192. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80019-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rosenberger G, Kutsche K. AlphaPIX and betaPIX and their role in focal adhesion formation. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85:265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.ten Klooster JP, Jaffer ZM, Chernoff J, Hordijk PL. Targeting and activation of Rac1 are mediated by the exchange factor beta-Pix. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:759–769. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200509096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhou W, Li X, Premont RT. Expanding functions of GIT Arf GTPase-activating proteins, PIX Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors and GIT-PIX complexes. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:1963–1974. doi: 10.1242/jcs.179465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Missy K, et al. AlphaPIX Rho GTPase guanine nucleotide exchange factor regulates lymphocyte functions and antigen receptor signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:3776–3789. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00507-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Omelchenko T, et al. beta-Pix directs collective migration of anterior visceral endoderm cells in the early mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 2014;28:2764–2777. doi: 10.1101/gad.251371.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim S, Lee SH, Park D. Leucine zipper-mediated homodimerization of the p21-activated kinase-interacting factor, beta Pix. Implication for a role in cytoskeletal reorganization. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:10581–10584. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000806200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Koh CG, Manser E, Zhao ZS, Ng CP, Lim L. Beta1PIX, the PAK-interacting exchange factor, requires localization via a coiled-coil region to promote microvillus-like structures and membrane ruffles. J Cell Sci. 2001;114:4239–4251. doi: 10.1242/jcs.114.23.4239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Audebert S, et al. Mammalian Scribble forms a tight complex with the betaPIX exchange factor. Curr Biol. 2004;14:987–995. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Osmani N, Vitale N, Borg JP, Etienne-Manneville S. Scrib controls Cdc42 localization and activity to promote cell polarization during astrocyte migration. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2395–2405. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Albertinazzi C, Za L, Paris S, de Curtis I. ADP-ribosylation factor 6 and a functional PIX/p95-APP1 complex are required for Rac1B-mediated neurite outgrowth. Mol Biol Cell. 2003;14:1295–1307. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-07-0406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anitei M, et al. Protein complexes containing CYFIP/Sra/PIR121 coordinate Arf1 and Rac1 signalling during clathrin-AP-1-coated carrier biogenesis at the TGN. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12:330–340. doi: 10.1038/ncb2034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chan, P. M., Lim, L. & Manser, E., PAK is regulated by PI3K, PIX, CDC42, and PP2Calpha and mediates focal adhesion turnover in the hyperosmotic stress-induced p38 pathway. J Biol Chem283, 24949–24961 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 24.Kuo JC, et al. Analysis of the myosin-II-responsive focal adhesion proteome reveals a role for beta-Pix in negative regulation of focal adhesion maturation. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13:383–393. doi: 10.1038/ncb2216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Momboisse F, et al. betaPIX-activated Rac1 stimulates the activation of phospholipase D, which is associated with exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells. J Cell Sci. 2009;122:798–806. doi: 10.1242/jcs.038109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Za L, et al. betaPIX controls cell motility and neurite extension by regulating the distribution of GIT1. J Cell Sci. 2006;119:2654–2666. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao ZS, Manser E, Loo TH, Lim L. Coupling of PAK-interacting exchange factor PIX to GIT1 promotes focal complex disassembly. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6354–6363. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.17.6354-6363.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fiuza M, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Perez-Otano I. GluN3A expression restricts spine maturation via inhibition of GIT1/Rac1 signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20807–20812. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312211110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Park J, Kim Y, Park ZY, Park D, Chang S. Neuronal specific betaPix-b stimulates actin-dependent processes via the interaction between its PRD and WH1 domain of N-WASP. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:1476–1484. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Llano O, et al. KCC2 regulates actin dynamics in dendritic spines via interaction with beta-PIX. Journal Cell Biol. 2015;209:671–686. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201411008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saneyoshi T, et al. Activity-dependent synaptogenesis: regulation by a CaM-kinase kinase/CaM-kinase I/betaPIX signaling complex. Neuron. 2008;57:94–107. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Franchi SA, et al. Identification of a Protein Network Driving Neuritogenesis of MGE-Derived GABAergic Interneurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:289. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Martin-Vilchez S, et al. RhoGTPase Regulators Orchestrate Distinct Stages of Synaptic Development. PloS One. 2017;12:e0170464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith KR, et al. GIT1 and betaPIX are essential for GABA(A) receptor synaptic stability and inhibitory neurotransmission. Cell Rep. 2014;9:298–310. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sun Y, Bamji SX. beta-Pix modulates actin-mediated recruitment of synaptic vesicles to synapses. J Neurosci. 2011;31:17123–17133. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2359-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Park E, et al. The Shank family of postsynaptic density proteins interacts with and promotes synaptic accumulation of the beta PIX guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Rac1 and Cdc42. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:19220–19229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301052200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang H, Webb DJ, Asmussen H, Horwitz AF. Synapse formation is regulated by the signaling adaptor GIT1. J Cell Biol. 2003;161:131–142. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Momboisse F, et al. The Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factors Intersectin 1L and beta-Pix control calcium-regulated exocytosis in neuroendocrine PC12 cells. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2010;30:1327–1333. doi: 10.1007/s10571-010-9580-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shirafuji T, et al. The role of Pak-interacting exchange factor-beta phosphorylation at serines 340 and 583 by PKCgamma in dopamine release. J Neurosci. 2014;34:9268–9280. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4278-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Santiago-Medina M, Gregus KA, Gomez TM. PAK-PIX interactions regulate adhesion dynamics and membrane protrusion to control neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:1122–1133. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shin EY, et al. Non-muscle myosin II regulates neuronal actin dynamics by interacting with guanine nucleotide exchange factors. PloS One. 2014;9:e95212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Totaro A, et al. Biochemical and functional characterisation of alphaPIX, a specific regulator of axonal and dendritic branching in hippocampal neurons. Biol Cell. 2012;104:533–552. doi: 10.1111/boc.201100060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim S, et al. Molecular cloning of neuronally expressed mouse betaPix isoforms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;272:721–725. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kim T, Park D. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel mouse betaPix isoform. Mol Cells. 2001;11:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee SJ, et al. Interaction of microtubules and actin with the N-terminus of betaPix-b(L) directs cellular pinocytosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2011;351:207–215. doi: 10.1007/s11010-011-0728-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rhee S, Yang SJ, Lee SJ, Park D. betaPix-b(L), a novel isoform of betaPix, is generated by alternative translation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;318:415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Guo H, et al. Specificity and efficiency of Cre-mediated recombination in Emx1-Cre knock-in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;273:661–665. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Liang H, Hippenmeyer S, Ghashghaei HT. A Nestin-cre transgenic mouse is insufficient for recombination in early embryonic neural progenitors. Biol Open. 2012;1:1200–1203. doi: 10.1242/bio.20122287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dupraz S, et al. The TC10-Exo70 complex is essential for membrane expansion and axonal specification in developing neurons. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:13292–13301. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3907-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fujita A, et al. GTP hydrolysis of TC10 promotes neurite outgrowth through exocytic fusion of Rab11- and L1-containing vesicles by releasing exocyst component Exo70. PloS One. 2013;8:e79689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lucato CM, et al. The Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-Trisphosphate-dependent Rac Exchanger 1.Ras-related C3 Botulinum Toxin Substrate 1 (P-Rex1.Rac1) Complex Reveals the Basis of Rac1 Activation in Breast Cancer Cells. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:20827–20840. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.660456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cash JN, Davis EM, Tesmer JJG. Structural and Biochemical Characterization of the Catalytic Core of the Metastatic Factor P-Rex1 and Its Regulation by PtdIns(3,4,5)P3. Structure. 2016;24:730–740. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2016.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Neudauer CL, Joberty G, Tatsis N, Macara IG. Distinct cellular effects and interactions of the Rho-family GTPase TC10. Curr Biol. 1998;8:1151–1160. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00486-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bagrodia S, Taylor SJ, Creasy CL, Chernoff J, Cerione RA. Identification of a mouse p21Cdc42/Rac activated kinase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:22731–22737. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.39.22731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shin EY, et al. Phosphorylation of p85 beta PIX, a Rac/Cdc42-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor, via the Ras/ERK/PAK2 pathway is required for basic fibroblast growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:44417–44430. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M203754200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lin R, Cerione RA, Manor D. Specific contributions of the small GTPases Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 to Dbl transformation. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23633–23641. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hemsath L, Dvorsky R, Fiegen D, Carlier MF, Ahmadian MR. An electrostatic steering mechanism of Cdc42 recognition by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins. Mol Cell. 2005;20:313–324. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abe T, Kato M, Miki H, Takenawa T, Endo T. Small GTPase Tc10 and its homologue RhoT induce N-WASP-mediated long process formation and neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:155–168. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Joberty G, Petersen C, Gao L, Macara IG. The cell-polarity protein Par6 links Par3 and atypical protein kinase C to Cdc42. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:531–539. doi: 10.1038/35019573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kanzaki M, Mora S, Hwang JB, Saltiel AR, Pessin JE. Atypical protein kinase C (PKCzeta/lambda) is a convergent downstream target of the insulin-stimulated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and TC10 signaling pathways. J Cell Biol. 2004;164:279–290. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200306152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pfenninger KH. Plasma membrane expansion: a neuron’s Herculean task. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2009;10:251–261. doi: 10.1038/nrn2593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Quiroga, S., Bisbal, M. & Caceres, A., Regulation of plasma membrane expansion during axon formation. Dev Neurobiol (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 63.Wu B, Guo W. The Exocyst at a Glance. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:2957–2964. doi: 10.1242/jcs.156398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kawase K, et al. GTP hydrolysis by the Rho family GTPase TC10 promotes exocytic vesicle fusion. Dev Cell. 2006;11:411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Gracias NG, Shirkey-Son NJ, Hengst U. Local translation of TC10 is required for membrane expansion during axon outgrowth. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3506. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Pommereit D, Wouters FS. An NGF-induced Exo70-TC10 complex locally antagonises Cdc42-mediated activation of N-WASP to modulate neurite outgrowth. J Cell Sci. 2007;120:2694–2705. doi: 10.1242/jcs.03475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lewis TL, Jr., Courchet J, Polleux F. Cell biology in neuroscience: Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying axon formation, growth, and branching. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:837–848. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201305098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Das A, et al. RalA promotes a direct exocyst-Par6 interaction to regulate polarity in neuronal development. Cell Sci. 2014;127:686–699. doi: 10.1242/jcs.145037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ahmed SM, Macara IG. The Par3 polarity protein is an exocyst receptor essential for mammary cell survival. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14867. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Di Cesare A, et al. p95-APP1 links membrane transport to Rac-mediated reorganization of actin. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:521–530. doi: 10.1038/35019561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang R, Kong E, Jin J, Hergovich A, Puschel AW. Rassf5 and Ndr kinases regulate neuronal polarity through Par3 phosphorylation in a novel pathway. J Cell Sci. 2014;127:3463–3476. doi: 10.1242/jcs.146696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wu Y, Wang C, Sun H, LeRoith D, Yakar S. High-efficient FLPo deleter mice in C57BL/6J background. PloS One. 2009;4:e8054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Khazaei MR, Püschel AW. Phosphorylation of the par polarity complex protein Par3 at serine 962 is mediated by aurora a and regulates its function in neuronal polarity. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:33571–33579. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.055897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Webb B, Sali A. Protein structure modeling with MODELLER. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1137:1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0366-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sievers F, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Lindorff-Larsen K, et al. Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins. 2010;78:1950–1958. doi: 10.1002/prot.22711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31:455–461. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures S1 - S13 (2.9MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES