Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 11;8:8858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27195-6

D5 dopamine receptors control glutamatergic AMPA transmission between the motor cortex and subthalamic nucleus

Lionel Froux 1,2, Morgane Le Bon-Jego 1,2, Cristina Miguelez 3,4, Elisabeth Normand 5,6, Stephanie Morin 1,2, Stéphanie Fioramonti 1,2, Massimo Barresi 1,2, Andreas Frick 7,8, Jerome Baufreton 1,2, Anne Taupignon 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5995923  PMID: 29891970

Abstract

Corticofugal fibers target the subthalamic nucleus (STN), a component nucleus of the basal ganglia, in addition to the striatum, their main input. The cortico-subthalamic, or hyperdirect, pathway, is thought to supplement the cortico-striatal pathways in order to interrupt/change planned actions. To explore the previously unknown properties of the neurons that project to the STN, retrograde and anterograde tools were used to specifically identify them in the motor cortex and selectively stimulate their synapses in the STN. The cortico-subthalamic neurons exhibited very little sag and fired an initial doublet followed by non-adapting action potentials. In the STN, AMPA/kainate synaptic currents had a voltage-dependent conductance, indicative of GluA2-lacking receptors and were partly inhibited by Naspm. AMPA transmission displayed short-term depression, with the exception of a limited bandpass in the 5 to 15 Hz range. AMPA synaptic currents were negatively controlled by dopamine D5 receptors. The reduction in synaptic strength was due to postsynaptic D5 receptors, mediated by a PKA-dependent pathway, but did not involve a modified rectification index. Our data indicated that dopamine, through post-synaptic D5 receptors, limited the cortical drive onto STN neurons in the normal brain.

Introduction

Unexpected events often occur in everyday life, requiring interruptions and changes to ongoing behavior. Studies in humans in a variety of tasks have suggested that slowing, changing, or interrupting ongoing behaviors are implemented by an input from the cortex to the subthalamic nucleus (STN) (for review1). This has also been suggested for rodents2,3, but whether the stop signal involved the cortex to STN connection, as postulated from human experiments, has not been established4.

The STN is a component nucleus of the basal ganglia, a collection of interconnected, subcortical nuclei that process cortical information, in order to promote contextually appropriate actions enacted by cortical and brainstem motor centers. Excitatory corticofugal fibers target neurons in the striatum that form the so-called direct and indirect basal ganglia pathways. A subset of neurons in various cortexes, including the motor cortex, targets the STN, the sole small excitatory (glutamatergic), nucleus of the basal ganglia, forming the cortico-subthalamic (Cx-STN) connection, often called the ‘hyperdirect’ pathway in basal ganglia studies58. Information transfer along this pathway seems faster and more broadly distributed among the basal ganglia output stations than in the two others911.

Task-irrelevant global motor suppression has also been attributed to the Cx-STN connection12. Indeed, a well-established feature of Parkinsonian states, characterized by motor symptoms, including akinesia, is a change in STN firing, associated with an increase in beta-band oscillations of the local field potential1315, with cortex activity then leading the STN14,16. The membrane properties of STN neurons, together with timely inhibitions and excitations due to neurons in the indirect and Cx-STN pathways, respectively, are thought to underlie the synchronized pathological oscillations17,18. In humans, an increased functional connectivity has been reported between some cortical areas, including the motor cortex and the STN19,20. However, structural connectivity may be diminished, since a partial loss of the hyperdirect motor Cx-STN projection has been found in MPTP-treated parkinsonian monkeys21. Finally, in Parkinson patients, high-frequency stimulation of the STN provides a significant improvement in cardinal motor symptoms. Data from rodents and humans support the hypothesis that the Cx-STN connection contributes to these beneficial motor effects2224’.

All these data have prompted recent re-evaluations of Cx-STN hyperdirect pathway functions in healthy and diseased humans and rodents1,2527.

Nevertheless, the properties of the cortical neurons that project to the STN are unknown, as most cortical fibers projecting to the STN are severed from somas in brain slices and electrical stimuli activate axons belonging to other nuclei. Another unknown is whether dopamine controls the Cx-STN synapses, as it controls cortico-striatal synapses. D5 dopamine receptors are expressed in cortical and subcortical structures28,29. Their role is rarely investigated due to the lack of subtype-specific ligands in the D1 family. In the STN, they strengthen oscillatory burst firing. They are expressed in the soma and dendritic processes at asymmetric synapses, suggesting that they may control glutamatergic afferents30. In these experiments, a retrograde labelling strategy was used to identify Cx-STN neurons in living brain slices. An optogenetic approach was used to isolate cortical afferents and investigate the properties of AMPA Cx-STN transmission. This elucidated, for the first time, the specific neuronal properties of the pathway and revealed that it was controlled by post-synaptic dopamine D5 receptors in the physiological state.

Results

Properties of Cx-STN neurons in the motor cortex

Cx-STN neurons form a small subpopulation of projection neurons in the cortex6. Their electrical properties are unknown. A discrete population of Cx-STN neurons was labeled and recorded in living slices. A fluorescent retrograde tracer was injected into the STN of young adult mice and acute brain slices were prepared 1 to 3 weeks later. Injection of Fluoro-Gold retrograde tracer within the boundaries of the STN resulted in discrete labelling in the motor cortex (Fig. 1a). Fluoro-Gold was also detected in neuron cell bodies in living slices (Fig. 1b). The fluorescent Cx-STN neurons showed a specific intrinsic property, a minimal hyperpolarization-activated sag, and their firing was characterized by an initial doublet, as well as virtually no adaptation over time (Fig. 1c). They had a mean resting membrane potential of −71.1 ± 1.5 mV (n = 15) and a membrane resistance of 103 ± 12 mΩ (n = 17). The sag index was 4.0 ± 0.5% (n = 17), with minimum and maximum values of 0.9% and 7.3%, respectively. Note that 2 neurons in the sample were spontaneously active, with firing frequencies of 4.46 and 5.37 Hz, respectively, at rest, but their sag values were in the same range as those of the other 15 neurons. Firing frequency exceeded 100 Hz when the neurons were strongly depolarized, but mean firing frequency at threshold was around 15 Hz (14.9 ± 2.5 Hz, n = 17, range 5–38 Hz), whereas the mean rheobase was 164 ± 34 pA (n = 17) (Fig. 1d–f). Firing frequency above the threshold was characterized by an input-output (f.i slope) of 347 ± 78 Hz/nA and firing rates gradually rose less steeply with increasing current injection (linearity index: 0.82 ± 0.07, n = 17) (Fig. 1g–i). Firing over time exhibited a high instantaneous frequency, due to the initial doublet of action potentials, and remained stable after the first 100 ms (Fig. 1j). There was little spike firing adaptation (SFA) at threshold, as well as at 30 Hz (SFA values close to 1) (Fig. 1k).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Properties of cortico-subthalamic neurons. (a) Confocal images of the cortex (top) after an injection of Fluoro-Gold (FG)retrograde tracer in the STN. To check the location of the injection site (bottom), the FG solution was mixed with a solution of anterograde virus expressing mCherry that labelled neurons at the injection site. FG and mCherry were detected by immunocytochemistry in a 350 μm slice used for electrophysiology. The orange box on the cortex indicates a high-density zone of FG-labelled neurons. Ctx, cortex; hip, hippocampus; ic, internal capsule; cp, cerebral peduncle; SNr, substantia nigra reticulata. (b) Infrared view of a living slice (left) and an FG-positive neuron at high magnification (right). (c) Example of the electrical properties of a retrograde-labelled cortico-subthalamic neuron. (di) Input-output relationship of a sample of 17 cortico-subthalamic neurons. (d) Mean firing frequency-current relationship. (e) Rheobase. (f) Firing frequency at threshold. (g) Mean firing frequency-current relationship above threshold. The current values represent the amplitude of step stimuli minus the amplitude of the first action potential-evoking step. (h) Firing frequency–current (f.i) slope. (i) Linearity index of the firing frequency–current relationship. e,f,g,h,i, left: individual values, right: mean ± sem. (j,k) Spike frequency over time in the same sample. (j) Instantaneous firing rate versus time (time was divided into 50 ms bins; times shown are the center of each bin) and (k) Spike firing adaptation, with black and grey symbols for values at threshold and 30 Hz, respectively. Three neurons with firing frequencies close to 30 Hz at threshold and those with above threshold values much higher than 30 Hz were not included in the 30 Hz data. (ck) Saline was supplemented with 20 μM DNQX, 50 μM APV, 50 μM picrotoxin, and 1 μM CGP 55845.

Synaptic transmission from the motor cortex to the STN involves GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors

Corticofugal fibers target the STN and stimulate STN neurons in animals. To investigate the synaptic properties of the Cx-STN synapses, the stimulation must be specific to the cortical afferent fibers and avoid activating the afferent fibers of any other afferent nuclei, such as thalamus or brain stem nuclei3133. This was achieved using anterograde transfection of neurons in the cortex. Injections of ChR2-mCherry-expressing adenovirus were targeted at the motor cortex, resulting in robust expression in cells, as well as in corticofugal fibers within the striatum, thalamus, internal capsule, and zona incerta (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Optical activation of corticofugal fibers in the STN results in action potential-dependent AMPA synaptic transmission (a) Expression of mCherry following transfection of a ChR2-mCherry viral solution in the motor cortex. (b,c) mCherry-positive corticofugal fibers in the STN. The STN boundaries are delineated by the STN neuron-specific FoxP2 marker (in green). (d) Example of the current evoked by a 1 ms flash and descriptive parameters of the inward currents measured in a sample of 24 subthalamic neurons. Current peak amplitude and charge, onset latency, time required to decay from 80 to 20% of peak value, and jitter are reported as individual values (left) and mean ± sem (right). Flash duration and luminance ranges were 0.4 to 1 ms and 0.55 to 1.15 mW.mm−2. (e,f) The light-induced inward currents were fully blocked by the specific AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist, DNQX (20 µM), or the sodium channel inhibitor, TTX (1 µM). The gray and black traces illustrate currents photo-evoked in controls and in the continued presence of the drugs, respectively. The graphs to the right of each recording display the summary data of current values before and after drug application. (g) Voltage-dependence and conductance of pharmacologically-isolated AMPA receptor EPSCs. Left: Representative traces of photo-induced EPSCs in the presence of the specific NMDA receptor antagonist, APV (50 µM). Holding voltage was changed from −90 to +50 mV in 20 mV steps. Right: Plot showing chord conductance against voltage. Conductance was significantly different from 1 at +30 and +50 mV, indicating rectifying AMPA receptors. (h) Naspm reduced the EPSC magnitude, indicating Ca2+-permeant, GluA2-lacking, as well as GluA2-containing, AMPA receptors. *Significantly different from the theoretical median = 1, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test, p = 0.0313 for both +30 mV and +50 mV. **Indicates significant changes at p = 0.0156, one-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test.

Within the STN, delineated by the STN neuron-specific FoxP2 marker33, mCherry fluorescence was observed in a bundle-like area in the lateral part of the nucleus (Fig. 2b–c). Cx-STN fibers were activated using blue light pulses delivered by an optical fiber placed over the internal capsule or STN. Brief laser flashes (0.4 to 1 ms) produced inward currents in the STN neurons located within the dense bundle of fluorescent fibers (Fig. 2d). No response was evoked in neurons outside the fluorescent area of the STN or when viral DNA included the sequence coding for a reporter alone, rather than for the fusion protein ChR2-reporter (EYFP, n = 4; mCherry, n = 4). In a sample of 24 neurons, light-evoked currents ranged from −14 to −293 pA, with a mean amplitude of 107 ± 13 pA and a mean charge close to −500 pA.ms. The latency between flashes and evoked currents was always greater than 1 ms, with a mean of 1.90 ± 0.08 ms, and the mean jitter value was 140 ± 12 μs, consistent with monosynaptic transmission (Fig. 2d). The AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist, DNQX, was applied to characterize the laser-evoked currents (Fig. 2e). This blocked the currents completely in all 5 cells tested, demonstrating that glutamate was released on photostimulation and that ionotropic glutamate AMPA/kainate receptors were involved. In similar conditions, a selective antagonist of AMPA receptors GYKI53655 (50 μM) inhibited currents, indicating minimal contribution of kainate receptors34. To assess whether glutamate release was initiated by action-potential-dependent processes, robust laser-evoked Cx-STN responses were recorded in STN neurons and then 1 µM TTX was applied to block voltage-dependent sodium channels. TTX completely abolished the responses in all 5 neurons, indicating that the glutamate release was action potential-dependent (Fig. 2f). Light-induced currents were thus AMPA-mediated excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSCs).

A study of nucleated patches from the STN neurons of immature rats suggested that AMPA receptors in STN neurons lacked GluA2 subunits35. I-V curves of photo-induced AMPA synaptic currents reversed close to 0 mV and displayed rectification (Supplemental Fig. S1). Normalized chord conductances were not significantly different from 1 in the negative potential range, but differed significantly from 1 at depolarized potentials (Fig. 2g). The synthetic analogue of Joro spider toxin, 1-naphthyl acetyl spermine (Naspm,100 μM), which selectively binds to GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors, was active in all neurons tested, reducing the average EPSC magnitude by 44 ± 0.09% (Fig. 2h). Thus, GluA2-lacking AMPA receptors are a specific feature of Cx-STN synapses in mature rodent brains.

Short-term plastic properties of motor Cx-STN synapses

Since short light flashes activated action potential-dependent AMPA synaptic transmission, the next step was to investigate the dynamic properties of the AMPA currents in the STN (Fig. 3). Layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex fired with a fidelity of 100% on photoactivation by trains of 8 flashes at frequencies up to 40 Hz (Supplementary Fig. S2). Furthermore, as shown in Fig. 1, the firing frequency at threshold of identified cortical neurons projecting on the STN was close to 10 Hz and always below 40 Hz. Thus, to reproduce the possible range of firing in the motor cortex, we used trains of flashes in the 0.05 to 40 Hz range. Figure 3a–c shows examples of AMPA/kainate EPSCs induced in STN neurons by trains of flashes at 0.05, 10, and 20 Hz. The only stimulation frequency that did not produce any significant change in the EPSC amplitude was 0.05 Hz. Apart from the first two flashes, 10 Hz yielded a depression. At a flash frequency of 20 Hz, all the EPCSs decreased. The group data (Fig. 3d) recapitulates these contrasting properties. Whereas a frequency of 0.05 Hz evoked constant EPSCs, at stimulation frequencies of 0.1 and 1 Hz, as well as 20 and 40 Hz, irrespective of their rank in the trains, EPSC amplitude always decreased significantly. In contrast, EPSCs evoked in the 5 to 15 Hz range displayed a ratio of 1 for the first two stimuli (EPSC2/EPSC1), followed by a decrease in the other EPSCs evoked by subsequent flashes. The group with a PPR of 1 comprised neurons that displayed a small potentiation or depression. Thus, 2 neurons out of the 11-neuron sample displayed short-term potentiation at 10 Hz, with a mean PPR of 1.10. There was, therefore, a small window with faithful transmission of the first two stimuli in a train in the 5 to 15 Hz range, a frequency domain close to the mean firing frequency of Cx-STN neurons at threshold. It was noteworthy that flashing the internal capsule produced the same short-term depression as flashing the STN (Fig. 3c, and Supplemental Fig. S3, grey symbols and lines).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Short-term plasticity of AMPA/kainate cortico-subthalamic transmission at stimulation frequencies between 0.05 and 40 Hz (a,c) Examples of EPSCs obtained at light frequencies of 0.05, 10, and 20 Hz (left) and group synaptic dynamics data (right). Mean response amplitudes were normalized to the first responses and plotted as a function of stimulus number within trains. The gray symbols in C depict the values obtained by flashing the internal capsule (and not the STN). The stimuli trains contained 8 photo-stimuli, except those at 0.05 Hz, which comprised only four photo-stimuli. (d) Summary graph of the filter properties of the cortico-subthalamic synapses. The black line and symbols display the ratios of paired pulse values, i.e. peak values of the second to the first EPSC in a train. The gray plot shows the ratio of the last to the first EPSC in a train (the 8th EPSC was the last, except for the tests at 0.05 and 0.1 Hz, where the ratio of the fourth to the first EPSC was calculated). As paired-pulse ratios exhibited no change in the 5 to 15 Hz range, a limited band-pass frequency was assumed. *Values significantly different from 1, α = 0.05, two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Dopamine D1/D5 receptor activation reduced the synaptic strength at Cx-STN synapses

Dopamine depletion has been shown to change the structural connectivity between the cortex and STN in non-human primates21, as well as rodents26, and functional connectivity in human studies19,20. These results raised the possibility that dopamine controlled Cx-STN synaptic strength, in addition to that of cortico-striatal synapses. Since we demonstrated that D5 receptors in the STN were expressed in or close to excitatory synapses30, we tested the hypothesis that Cx-STN transmission was controlled by dopamine acting on D5 receptors.

We used 3 dopaminergic agonists (SKF 82958, SKF 81297 or SKF 38393, 2–5 µM, referred to collectively as ‘D1/D5 agonists’) to neutralize any possible difference in the affinity or potency of the drugs for D5 or D1 receptors, as reported for recombinant D1 and D5 receptors3638. Unexpectedly, and irrespective of the agonist, D1/D5 activation reduced Cx-STN transmission in all 13 neurons tested (Fig. 4a). This was truly a D1/D5-mediated action, since it was occluded when a D1/D5 agonist was co-applied with the D1/D5 antagonist, SCH23390 (10 µM) (Fig. 4b,e). D1/D5 agonists significantly reduced the EPSC amplitude from −126 ± 27 pA to −75 ± 16 pA (p = 0.0039, n = 13, two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test). The mean reduction in EPSC amplitude was −38 ± 5%. Accordingly, the EPSC charge was reduced from −643 ± 145 pA.ms to 407 ± 89 pA.ms (−37 ± 7%, p = 0.0039, n = 13).In the continued presence of SCH23390, D1/D5 agonists no longer had any significant action. Mean control and test amplitude values were −94 ± 18 pA and −84 ± 17  pA, respectively (p = 0.30, n = 9, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). The charge also remained unchanged (control: 297 ± 43 pA.ms; test: 264 ± 47 pA.ms). At the concentrations required to act on neurons in brain slices, D1/D5 family receptor agonists do not discriminate between D1 and D5 receptors, although they show some specificity on recombinant receptors expressed in heterologous systems3638 and cell preparations39. Our results may, therefore, be due to the activation of either D1 or D5 receptors. However, there is no experimental evidence of D1 receptor expression in the STN, whereas D5 receptors have been identified28,30. To test the assumption that the inhibitory action of the D1/D5 family agonists was mediated by D5 receptors, D5−/− mice40, bearing a null mutation of the D5 receptor, were infected with the same adeno-viral expression vector as wild-type mice. The D1/D5 agonists did not produce a significant change in the EPSC amplitude or charge (Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test, n = 10, p = 0.10 and p = 0.13 for amplitude and charge, respectively) (Fig. 4c). This suggested that D5 receptors were involved in the inhibitory action of D1/D5 agonists on AMPA/kainate EPSCs. It should be noted though that there was variation in the dataset. Activation of recombinant D5 receptors is known to consistently produce elevation of cAMP, when expressed in heterologous models, such as HEK2933639. Accordingly, the action of D5 receptors on burst firing in the STN was mediated by a cAMP/PKA pathway30. The protein kinase A peptide inhibitor, PKA inhibitor fragment (6–22) amide, referred to as PKI, was used in the pipette solution to block the cAMP/PKA transduction pathway before testing the action of the D1/D5 receptor agonists (Fig. 4d). When the pipette solution was supplemented with 20 μM PKI, the absence of significant changes in the light-induced EPSCs indicated that the D1/D5 agonists were inactive. The group data values were not significantly different: −129 ± 11 pA (mean control values) and −117 ± 17 pA (mean test values), (p = 0.31, Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test, n = 8). Furthermore, no significant change was observed in the EPSC paired-pulse ratio (PPR) when 20 Hz flashes were applied to neurons kept in saline or bathed in a D1/D5 agonist (5 µM) for 10 to 60 min. The PPR (peak current ratio of photo-induced EPSC2 and EPSC1) was similar in both conditions (Fig. 4f). PPR was 0.60 ± 0.11 (n = 7) in control and 0.65 ± 0.09 (n = 8) in D1/D5 agonist (p = 0.54, Mann and Whitney test for independent samples). Altogether, these experiments established that the D5 receptors were postsynaptic. In some neuron classes, changes in synaptic strength involve modifications in the subunit composition of AMPA receptors. The replacement of GluA2-lacking receptors by ones containing GluA2 results in a smaller EPSC amplitude at negative membrane potentials and an increased EPSC amplitude at depolarized potentials41. The next experiment tested whether D5 receptors triggered a switch in postsynaptic AMPA receptor subunit composition and, presumably, Ca2+ permeability. Rectification indexes were collected from neurons in saline alone and supplemented with 5 μM D1/D5 agonist for 10–60 min. EPSCs were measured at −80 and + 40 mV and the chord conductance ratio was calculated to obtain a rectification index (Fig. 4g). The rectification indexes were not significantly different, suggesting that GluA2 subunits were not incorporated into AMPA receptors at the Cx-STN synapses (mean control, 0.74 ± 0.12, n = 11, and mean D1/D5 agonists, 0.94 ± 0.21, n = 7, p = 0.46, Mann and Whitney test for independent samples).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

D5 dopamine receptors reduced AMPA/kainate synaptic strength. (a) Activating D1/D5 receptors reduced cortico-subthalamic AMPA/kainate EPSCs in subthalamic neurons. Illustration of the action of the D1/D5 agonist, SKF 82958 (5 µM). D1/D5 agonists refer to SKF 82958, SKF 81297, or SKF 38393, at 2–5 µM. The 3 dopaminergic agonists were used to neutralize the differences in the potency of the drugs or their affinity for D5 or D1 receptors, as reported in the literature. (b) The continued presence of SCH 23390 (10 µM) prevented the action of SKF 82958 (5 µM). (c) Perfusion of 5 µM D1/D5 agonists had no significant effect in slices from D5−/− mice. (d) D1/D5 agonists (5 µM) were no longer active in the neuron sample tested with a peptide inhibitor (PKI, 20 µM in pipette solution) to intracellularly inhibit protein kinase A. In (a) to (d), traces show the currents recorded immediately prior to (top) and 10 min after agonist perfusion (bottom), and group data show individual paired values as well as mean ± sem. Two-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank tests were used; α was 0.05; **indicates significant changes at p = 0.0039; ns, not significant. (e) Box plot summary of the changes in EPSC amplitude obtained under the conditions depicted in a to d. The boxes present the distribution with the median as a central line. The hinges and edges display the 25th and 75th percentiles, whereas the “whiskers” display the minimal and maximal values. Action of D1/D5 agonists only reached significance in wild-type mice and not in any other 3 conditions. A Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to test a null hypothesis (no action of D1/D5 agonists). α = 0.05; **significant changes at p = 0.0039; ns, not significant. (f) No change in photo-induced paired pulse ratio (PPR) when D1/D5 receptors were activated. (g) The conductance ratio at −80 mV and +40 mV is the rectification index. It did not change in neurons bathed in D1/D5 agonists for 10–60 min. Left, representative traces of EPSCs photo-evoked at −80 mV and +40 mV in control (top) and 5 μM SKF 81 297 (bottom); right, group data showing the ratio of chord conductance at +40 mv to that at −80 mV. The reversal potential of the synaptic response in the presence of D1/D5 agonists was measured in 3 neurons, where a full I.V curve was established. Examples in (f) and (g) depict different neurons and group data report EPSCs obtained in saline alone or supplemented with 5 µM D1/D5 agonist for 10 to 60 min.

Discussion

The Cx-STN hyperdirect pathway is a monosynaptic pathway from the cortex to the STN, a component nucleus of the basal ganglia. Our results provide the first data on the presynaptic side of the pathway.

Cx-STN neurons project to the STN ipsi-laterally. They also project to many other structures, such as the striatum and thalamus, in addition to brainstem areas and the spinal cord6,7. As such, they belong to the broad class of pyramidal tract neurons42. Their only specific, intrinsic property is their hyperpolarization-activated sag, which is much smaller than that reported for the class as a whole43,44. Their firing is characterized by an initial doublet, followed by stable, non-accommodating, action potential firing, underlying a clearly biphasic, instantaneous spike frequency rate versus time. This property had not generally been reported for corticospinal neurons in the motor cortex43,44. It is important to determine whether the Cx-STN neurons belong to a subclass of pyramidal tract neurons and have specific intra-cortical circuit properties, since this will help to understand the function(s) of the Cx-STN pathway and the role of the projections of the Cx-STN neuron population to structures other than the STN.

The results presented in this paper provide the first experimental data on the short term plasticity of AMPA Cx-STN synapses. This approach reproduces the electrical protocols previously used to stimulate cortical afferents45,46, but has the unique property of being specific to corticofugal inputs: the synapses described here are truly Cx-STN synapses with no involvement of thalamus, brainstem, or midbrain components. Firstly, ChR2 was able to reliably fire pyramidal cell bodies up to 40 Hz. Secondly, light evoked action potential-dependent glutamate release. Thirdly, stimulating the internal capsule or Cx-STN terminals produced similar results. However, light-evoked synaptic responses may exhibit artificial synaptic depression, depending on the AAV expression vector serotype, as well as the stimulation technique, in a neuron-specific manner47. Since electrical stimulation of the vast majority of cortical areas connected to the STN, including the motor cortex, is impractical in slices48, one possible way of assessing the dynamics of motor Cx-STN responses will be to compare the properties of each excitatory afferent of the STN with the properties revealed by global electrical stimulation of all excitatory afferents. Finally, studying the responses of spontaneously firing neurons to trains of motor cx-STN EPSPs will reveal features specific to synaptic integration in the STN. For example, kainate receptors may contribute to EPSPs summation and affect the integration of diverse synaptic inputs since they do so in other brain structures49.

Dopamine is critical for the functions supported by the STN. It acts on the STN via pre- and post-synaptic receptors in the D1 and D2 families. To date, there is no evidence to support the expression of the D1 subtype in the STN of Rodents, although Primates express both D1 and D5 subtypes50. In the physiological state, Cx-STN transmission is likely to be reduced by the action of postsynaptic D5 receptors (this study) and presynaptic D2 receptors51, if the latter are on Cx-STN afferents, rather than other glutamatergic thalamic, brainstem, or midbrain afferents3133. Estimates of DA affinities suggest that DA levels in the STN readily activate both receptors52,53. Thus, dopamine may limit the cortical drive onto STN neurons in the normal brain.

The indirect pathway afferents are also subject to negative control but by D2/D3 receptors only, since there is no evidence of receptors in the D1 family acting on these afferents54. Post-synaptic receptors in both families act on the firing properties of STN neurons. The D5 subtypes potentiate spontaneous and rebound burst firing, an action opposed by post-synaptic D2 receptors, which ultimately strengthen regular firing30,5557. Besides, data obtained in slices from DA-deprived animals58,59 or, more recently26, are characterized by changes in sensitivity to dopamine and long-term structural changes, and therefore cannot be entirely inferred from acute data.

Despite widespread distribution in the brain28,29, D5 receptor signaling in neurons is still largely unknown. These data established that D5 receptor action on AMPA synaptic transmission involved PKA-dependent phosphorylation, since it was occluded by a PKA-specific inhibitor. Accordingly, cAMP/PKA signaling is the typical intracellular pathway of D5 receptors3638, although other or complementary signaling pathways have been proposed for various cell types, including neurons39. However, in neurons, the ultimate result of PKA signaling is usually an increase in AMPA currents via phosphorylation of the GluA1 subunit, which promotes AMPA receptor insertion at extrasynaptic sites6062. To our knowledge, the only example of AMPA current inhibition following D5 receptor activation was reported by63, see their Fig. 1b.

Changes in biophysical properties, either directly, via subunit composition, or receptor trafficking, may explain AMPA current inhibition. The phosphorylation state of AMPA receptor subunits by protein kinases/phosphatases is known to change synaptic strength bidirectionally. The reduction in AMPA current may then involve intermediates downstream from PKA64,65. AMPA receptor transmission may also be controlled by exchanging GluA2-containing and Ca2+-permeable GluA2-lacking receptors. GluA2-lacking receptors have been reported in the STN of immature rodents35. Our experiments revealed that GluA2-lacking receptors remained a feature of Cx-STN transmission in mature animals, but the rectification index was unchanged after D5 receptor activation. Receptor subunits are thus unlikely to have caused the change in AMPA current found here, though AMPA current was diminished and receptor composition shifted towards more abundant Ca2+-permeable GluA2-lacking receptors following dopamine depletion in mice26. Finally, auxiliary proteins (scaffold and cytoskeletal proteins, as well as AMPA-receptor interacting proteins and kinase anchor proteins) have been identified as regulators of AMPA receptor clustering, trafficking, and function. One auxiliary protein, GSG1L, has recently been identified as a negative regulator of AMPA receptors66 and might also be a target for D5 receptors.

Data obtained in vivo are equivocal: an increased coherence between the cortex and STN has been reported in Parkinson’s patients, as well as experimental models of the disease14,16,67,68, but long-term dopamine depletion attenuates the cortical innervation of the STN in primates21 and rodents26. At the basal ganglia circuit level, a decrease in Cx-STN transmission has been found in dopamine-deprived mice, whereas Cx-STN-induced heterosynaptic potentiation of inhibitory pallido-STN transmission was occluded in an NMDA-, as well as striato-pallidal-dependent manner, and the ratio of AMPAR to NMDAR currents was maintained26,34. In addition, Li et al. reported that, in awake, dopamine-deprived rodents, Cx-STN neurons in M1 were less active but fired more often in bursts, and had more coherent firing activities23. How these phenomena in the cortex and basal ganglia generate the increased coherence between the cortex and STN and/or the Parkinsonian-like symptoms has not yet been demonstrated.

The negative control of glutamate transmission is presumably partially maintained in dopamine-depleted states, due to the D5 receptors’ high intrinsic activity69. In Parkinson’s patients and experimental models of the disease, the strength of cortical input to the STN also presumably results from the balance between the possible lack of action of D2 receptors51 and the continued action of D5 receptors (present study), together with adaptive changes to continued dopamine deprivation26,34.

Methods

Animals

Procedures designed in agreement with the directive 86/609/EEC of the European Community Council were approved by the Comité d’Ethique en Experimentation Animale n°50 (agreement number: CE5012077-A). C57Bl6 and dopamine D5 receptor null mutant mice (D5−/− mice)40 were used.

Identification of Cx-STN neurons

We used a retrograde strategy with three types of tracers, a fluorescent dye and two viral expression vectors. The fluorescent dye Fluoro-Gold (aminostilbamidine, 2% in 0.9% NaCl) was bought from Invitrogen. A canine adenovirus (CAVDsREDII, 2.5 1012 IU/mL) was purchased from the Institut de Genetique Moleculaire de Montpellier70. A rabies-based recombinant virus (RabV, 1×106 IU/ml) was also used. It was a glycoprotein deleted variant of the vaccine strain of rabies virus, SAD B19, incapable of trans-synaptic spread71. It was used as a single cycle retrograde tracer as described in72. Viral starter stocks were a kind gift from K.-K. Conzelmann (Max-von-Pettenkofer Institute). Both viral vectors included the gene of the fluorescent protein mCherry. The tracers were injected in the STN of 21 to 35 day-old C57Bl6 mice. Coordinates from Bregma of the injection were: lateral, −1.2 mm; posterior, −1.4 mm; and depth, −4.95 mm. Since preliminary experiments had shown that none of the 3 reporters labelled the injection site enough to accurately check that the injection was made within the limits of the STN, we injected a 20 nL mixture 1/1 of retrograde tracer and of anterograde viral reporter solutions. The anterograde reporters were rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-mCherry-WPRE-hGHa and rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-EYFP-WPRE-hGH for Fluoro-Gold and viral expression vectors, respectively; see below for details on the anterograde reporters. This procedure established that the injection resulted in anterograde expression within the limits of the STN in 5 mice. Our results come from 10 Fluoro-Gold-, 2 CAV-2-, and 5 RabV- labelled neurons.

Identification and stimulation of Cx-STN fibers in the STN

We transfected the motor cortex using anterograde expression vectors. Adenoviruses carrying the gene of a fluorescent reporter protein (either mCherry or YFP) or fusion genes coding for ChR2 and one of the fluorescent reporter proteins were injected unilaterally into the cortex of C57Bl6 and D5−/− 21- to28-day-old mice. Viral solutions (titer ≈ 1012 IU/mL) were purchased from the Vector Cores of the Universities of Pennsylvania or North Carolina. Viral DNA were: rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-hChR2(H134R)-EYFP-WPRE-hGH and rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-hChR2(H134R)-mCherry-WPRE-hGH and their control counterparts (i.e.: rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-EYFP-WPRE-hGH or rAAV2/1-hSynapsin-mCherry-WPRE-hGH). Injection volumes were 0.5 μL and 3 injections were made. Motor cortex was targeted using coordinates derived from73 and iteratively adjusted for smaller animals in initial experiments. Typical coordinates from Bregma were: lateral, −1.125/−1.125/−1.375 mm; posterior, +1.4/+1.15/+1.4 mm; and depth, −1.275/−1.275/−1.475 mm. Location of the reporter was routinely checked using a mouse brain atlas74. In a subset of experiments, we functionally assessed transfection location by recording striatal medium spiny neurons in coronal brain slices. Only medium spiny neurons in the dorsolateral margin of the striatum, close to the corpus callosum, were found to be responding to optical stimulations, as expected for medium spiny neurons in the motor area of the striatum. To test whether ChR2-EYFP expression changed the basic electrical properties of the pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the motor cortex, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed on brain slices obtained from naive and virally-transfected mice. They did not reveal any significant differences in the intrinsic membrane or firing properties of ChR2-positive and ChR2-negative neurons. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the input-output curves of discharge frequency versus injected current (p > 0.05, non-parametric variance analysis and marginal regression, n = 28, 14 neurons in each group; data not shown).

Slice preparation

After allowing 1 week for Fluoro-Gold diffusion or 2–3 weeks for viral expression, or in 35–50-day old control non-injected animals, acute parasagittal slices were made. Animals were deeply anesthetized and a saturated (95% O2/5% CO2), ice-cold solution containing (in mM): 250 sucrose, 26 NaHCO3, 7 MgSO4, 2 KCl, 1.15 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, and 11 glucose (pH 7.35) was perfused intracardially before the brain was quickly removed and cut into 350 μm-thick slices using a VT-1200S vibratome (Leica). The slices were transferred in a storage chamber for 40 min at 32 °C. The storage solution was an artificial cerebral spinal solution (referred to as ‘saline’, composed of (in mM): 124 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 3.6 KCl, 1.3 MgCl2, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.25 HEPES, 10 glucose at pH 7.35, and saturated by bubbling 95% O2/5% CO2) supplemented with 5 μM glutathion and 1 mM sodium pyruvate. Slices were then maintained at room temperature in the same solution until used for recording.

Histology

Immunohistochemistry was performed on 350 µm-thick slices previously used for electrophysiology or on 50 µm-thick brain slices obtained from perfusion-fixed animals as previously described75. Following recording, the slices were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB), and then kept until used in PB supplemented with 0.2% sodium azide at 4 °C. After 1 h of incubation in “Triton PBS” (PBS with 0.3% v/v Triton X-100 and 0.02% w/v sodium azide; Sigma) containing 1% v/v BSA (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories), sections were incubated overnight in Triton PBS containing 1% v/v BSA and the appropriate mixture of two primary antibodies: goat anti-forkhead box protein P2 (FoxP2; 1:200; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-21069); rabbit anti-Fluoro-Gold (1:20 000; Millipore, AB153); rat anti-red fluorescent protein (1:1000; Chromotek, 5F8 αred); rabbit anti-yellow fluorescent protein (1:1000, Invitrogen, A11122). This step was at room temperature except for labelling Fluoro-Gold which was made at 4 °C. After exposure to primary antibodies, slices were washed in PBS and incubated at room temperature in Triton PBS for 2 hours containing a mixture of the appropriate secondary antibodies: donkey anti-rat Alexa 594 (1:500; Invitrogen, A 21 209); donkey anti-goat Alexa 488 (1:500; Life Technology, A11 055); donkey anti-rabbit Alexa 488 (1:1000; Life Technology, AV 21 206). Finally, after washing in PBS, all slices were mounted in Vectashield (H-1000 or H-1200, Vector Laboratories, USA). Confocal macroscopy as well as microscopy was used for imaging.

Electrophysiology

Whole cell patch clamp experiments were made at 32 °C in a submersion recording chamber under an Examiner Z1 (Zeiss, Germany) upright microscope. Slices were bathed in the saline described above (without glutathion and sodium pyruvate), at a rate of 3 mL/min. Whole-cell recording pipettes (4–6 MΩ) contained (in mM) 140 K-gluconate, 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 1 CaCl2, 2 ATP-Mg, and 0.4 Na-GTP for the current clamp experiments in the cortex. They contained an otherwise similar solution to the exception of K-gluconate, replaced by CsCl, and addition of 2 mM QX314, for the voltage clamp experiments performed in the STN. In the subset of experiments that established the I.V. curve and conductance of AMPA EPSCs, a specific intra-pipette solution was used. Its composition was (in mM): 120 cesium methanesulfonate, 10 NaCl, and 5 TEACl, in addition to 11 EGTA, 10 HEPES, 1 CaCl2, 2 ATP-Mg, 0.4 Na-GTP and 2 QX314. In all cases, the osmolarity of intra-pipette solutions was between 280 and 300 mOsm and pH was adjusted to 7.25. Cells were visualized under IR-DIC and fluorescence microscopy. Experiments were conducted with Axon Instruments hardware and software (Axopatch-1D, Digidata 1322 A, and PClamp V9.2; Molecular Devices, USA), with the amplifier filter set at 5 kHz, and the digitization rate at 20 kHz. Voltages were corrected off line for liquid junction potentials.

Optical stimulations

Optical stimulations were performed using a 473 nm diode pumped solid state laser (Optotronics, USA) connected to a 800 μm optical fiber (Errol, Paris, France) usually positioned at the surface of the slice next to the recording site. We also assessed positions of fiber away from the recording site, in a more frontal area, with light directed to the internal capsule (and not reaching the STN). We found no major change in the responses to light to the exception of their size (which was much smaller) and the frequency of their occurrence (which was considerably reduced). In addition, we tested moving the fiber from the STN area to the internal capsule at more frontal locations while recording the light-evoked responses from a STN neuron. Again, we did not find major changes except their size which progressively diminished until responses most often disappeared. The maximum output power at the end of the fiber was 1.15 mW.mm−2.

Recording protocols

First, neurons were held in the voltage clamp mode at −60 mV, and −5 mV steps were applied for off line determination of intrinsic cell parameters. Then, current clamp or voltage clamp modes were used. Intrinsic properties and firing of the Cx-STN neurons were studied at zero current level by presenting families of currents steps ranging from −200 to +600 pA in 40 pA increments, in saline supplemented with inhibitors of fast synaptic transmission i.e. 20 μM DNQX, 50 μM APV, 50 μM picrotoxin and 1 μM CGP 55845. The activation of Cx-STN transmission from corticofugal axons was performed in voltage clamp mode in the continued presence of GABA A and B receptor antagonists (50 μM picrotoxin and 1 μM CGP 55845) to avoid the occurrence of huge spontaneous inhibitory events. The membrane was held at −80 mV unless otherwise stated. A −5 mV voltage step was included at the beginning of all sweeps to allow off line control of access resistance and cell parameters, and single optic stimulations were applied. Their duration and luminance were adjusted to produce a smooth light-evoked current with half maximal amplitude whenever this was possible. Flash durations were always smaller than or equal to 1 ms. We found that light-evoked AMPA currents usually first increased amplitude and then either markedly run down or maintained amplitude. The neurons showing such a rundown were discarded on line. The phases of stabilization and/or adjustment lasted approximately 20 min and were not analyzed. Single flashes or trains were applied at 20 sec intervals, and repeated between 6 and 12 times. Slices were discarded after trains at 40 Hz, to prevent the possible interference of induction of plasticity.

Pharmacology

Unless otherwise stated, drugs were diluted in saline and perfused in the same way as control saline. We used SKF 82958, SKF 81297, or SKF 38393, 2–5 µM. The 3 dopaminergic agonists were used to neutralize the differences in the affinity or potency of the drugs for D5 or D1 receptors reported in the literature. The term ‘D1/D5 agonists’ refers to SKF 82958, SKF 81297 and SKF 38393 (2.5 to 5 μM). We found no qualitative difference in the action of the three drugs. Possible quantitative differences between the three drugs were not investigated. In these experiments, the ‘before’ values were the averaged 6–12 values in saline immediately preceding the drug perfusion, ‘after’ referring to the averaged 6–12 values measured after 10 min of perfusion.

Drugs and chemicals

Unless otherwise stated, drugs were obtained from Tocris Bioscience (UK) or Abcam (France), except SKF-82958, which was purchased from Sigma (France).

Data analysis

Data were analyzed off line using pClamp V9.2 (Molecular Devices, USA), Origin V7 (OriginLab, USA), Prism5 (GraphPad Software, USA) and R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Austria). Access resistance and cell parameters were calculated from the average response to 5 steps of −5 mV in voltage clamp. The firing of Cx-STN neurons was characterized as follows. When the neurons did not fire action potential at rest, resting membrane was the mean voltage at zero current level. The sag index was the mean ratio of the peaks to the steady state voltages induced by the steps from −200 pA to −40 pA. Rheobase was the value of the step inducing the first action potential; it defined the threshold. Input-output was characterized by plotting the firing frequency for all steps, or for those above threshold. In the latter case, the current values represented the amplitude of the step minus the rheobase value. Firing-current slopes (f.i slope) and linearity indexes were derived from the firing frequency above threshold values. F.i slope was the slope of the linear fit of the firing frequency above threshold curve. Linearity index was the slope of the 3rd interval divided by the slope over the 1st interval. The instantaneous firing frequency was measured as a function of time, set in bins of 50 ms, from the onset of the current traces at threshold, or with approximately 30 Hz average firing rates when 30 Hz was not threshold. Spike firing adaptation (SFA) was the ratio of the last two interval interspikes (ISI) to the first 2 ISI. It was calculated at threshold if this elicited at least 5 AP, and for the step that produced approximately a firing rate of 30 Hz. The Cx-STN transmission was studied in the voltage clamp mode. Peak and charge of photo-evoked current, peak of capacitive transient and holding current were detected and plotted against time. Neurons with an initial value of access resistance greater than 35 MΩ or showing a change of access resistance of more than 20% over the recording period were discarded. Values obtained from 6 to 12 consecutive single sweep currents were averaged to be included in any group data. Onset latency of current was measured at current value equal to mean holding current minus 2 SD. The chord conductances were calculated in the same way as35. The rectification index (RI) was calculated using chord conductances (g). The following equation was used: g+40/g-80 = (I+40/(40 − Erev)/(I−80(80 − Erev). Thus, RI is expressed as a ratio that will decrease when rectification increases. I−80 and I+40 are the EPSC current amplitudes recorded by holding the membrane potential at −80 mV and +40 mV, respectively. The Erev values were obtained from the I–V plots.

Statistics

In the text, all values are given as means ± SEM, when mean and median are close. If this is not the case, both median and mean are given. Box plots are used for graphic presentation of electrophysiological data, due to the small sample size. The box plot presents the distribution with the median as a central line. The hinges and edges of the box display the 25th and 75th percentiles, whereas the “whiskers” display the minimal and maximal values. Statistical comparisons were made using non-parametric tests with an α level of 0.05. The Mann and Whitney test, as well as the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, were used for data obtained from independent and matched paired samples, respectively. The Wilcoxon test was also used to assess difference from a hypothetical value.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information (381.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. L. Kerkerian Le Goff and Dr. J.L. Lanciego for helpful discussions on our project. We acknowledge the help of Gilles le Pape (AnaStats, Les Vigneaux, France, www.anastats.fr) for statistical analysis of the neurons’ intrinsic parameters and input-output curves. We wish to thank Drs Melanie Ginger and Katy Le Corf, for producing the RabV vector, Dr. Sibley (NINDS, Bethesda), who allowed us to use the D5R mutant mice he engineered, as well as Dr. J. Waddington (Royal College of Surgeons, Dublin), who donated the D5R mutant mice we used to generate a colony. Imaging was performed in the Bordeaux Imaging Center, part of the national FranceBioImaging infrastructure. L.F had a PhD funded by MRT, and received a 6-month fellowship from France Parkinson. The Regional Council of Aquitaine and Fondation de France supported this work by grants 12006005 (FCAN scheme), and 2005013850 and 00016810, respectively. France Parkinson supported part of the work (grant n° 5293). Financial support was also provided by CNRS, University of Bordeaux, and Labex Brain (ANR-10-LABX-0043).

Author Contributions

L.F., M.L.J., C.M., and A.T. conducted the investigations and analyzed the data. E.N., S.M., S.F., M.B. and A.F. were in charge of the viral vectors and transfections. A.T. wrote the main manuscript text and A.T., M.L.J., and L.F. prepared the figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-27195-6.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Aron AR, Herz DM, Brown P, Forstmann BU, Zaghloul K. Frontosubthalamic Circuits for Control of Action and Cognition. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2016;36:11489–11495. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2348-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eagle DM, et al. Stop-signal reaction-time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:178–188. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schmidt R, Leventhal DK, Mallet N, Chen F, Berke JD. Canceling actions involves a race between basal ganglia pathways. Nature neuroscience. 2013 doi: 10.1038/nn.3456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mallet N, et al. Arkypallidal Cells Send a Stop Signal to Striatum. Neuron. 2016;89:308–316. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nambu A, et al. Excitatory cortical inputs to pallidal neurons via the subthalamic nucleus in the monkey. Journal of neurophysiology. 2000;84:289–300. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.1.289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kita T, Kita H. The subthalamic nucleus is one of multiple innervation sites for long-range corticofugal axons: a single-axon tracing study in the rat. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012;32:5990–5999. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5717-11.2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kita, T., Osten, P. & Kita, H. Rat subthalamic nucleus and zona incerta share extensively overlapped representations of cortical functional territories. The Journal of comparative neurology, 10.1002/cne.23655 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Haynes WI, Haber SN. The organization of prefrontal-subthalamic inputs in primates provides an anatomical substrate for both functional specificity and integration: implications for Basal Ganglia models and deep brain stimulation. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013;33:4804–4814. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4674-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sato F, Parent M, Levesque M, Parent A. Axonal branching pattern of neurons of the subthalamic nucleus in primates. The Journal of comparative neurology. 2000;424:142–152. doi: 10.1002/1096-9861(20000814)424:1<142::AID-CNE10>3.0.CO;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mathai A, Smith Y. The corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic pathways: two entries, one target. So what? Frontiers in systems neuroscience. 2011;5:64. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2011.00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Deffains, M. et al. Subthalamic, not striatal, activity correlates with basal ganglia downstream activity in normal and parkinsonian monkeys. eLife5, 10.7554/eLife.16443 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Wessel JR, et al. Stop-related subthalamic beta activity indexes global motor suppression in Parkinson’s disease. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2016;31:1846–1853. doi: 10.1002/mds.26732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bergman H, Wichmann T, Karmon B, DeLong MR. The primate subthalamic nucleus. II. Neuronal activity in the MPTP model of parkinsonism. Journal of neurophysiology. 1994;72:507–520. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Litvak V, et al. Resting oscillatory cortico-subthalamic connectivity in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2011;134:359–374. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mallet N, et al. Parkinsonian beta oscillations in the external globus pallidus and their relationship with subthalamic nucleus activity. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2008;28:14245–14258. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4199-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mallet N, et al. Disrupted dopamine transmission and the emergence of exaggerated beta oscillations in subthalamic nucleus and cerebral cortex. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2008;28:4795–4806. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0123-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Baufreton J, Atherton JF, Surmeier DJ, Bevan MD. Enhancement of excitatory synaptic integration by GABAergic inhibition in the subthalamic nucleus. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005;25:8505–8517. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1163-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paz JT, Deniau JM, Charpier S. Rhythmic bursting in the cortico-subthalamo-pallidal network during spontaneous genetically determined spike and wave discharges. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005;25:2092–2101. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4689-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baudrexel S, et al. Resting state fMRI reveals increased subthalamic nucleus-motor cortex connectivity in Parkinson’s disease. NeuroImage. 2011;55:1728–1738. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Akram H, et al. l-Dopa responsiveness is associated with distinctive connectivity patterns in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders. 2017;32:874–883. doi: 10.1002/mds.27017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mathai A, et al. Reduced cortical innervation of the subthalamic nucleus in MPTP-treated parkinsonian monkeys. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2015;138:946–962. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gradinaru V, Mogri M, Thompson KR, Henderson JM, Deisseroth K. Optical deconstruction of parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science. 2009;324:354–359. doi: 10.1126/science.1167093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li Q, et al. Therapeutic deep brain stimulation in Parkinsonian rats directly influences motor cortex. Neuron. 2012;76:1030–1041. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horn A, et al. Connectivity Predicts deep brain stimulation outcome in Parkinson disease. Annals of neurology. 2017;82:67–78. doi: 10.1002/ana.24974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wessel JR, Aron AR. On the Globality of Motor Suppression: Unexpected Events and Their Influence on Behavior and Cognition. Neuron. 2017;93:259–280. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chu HY, McIver EL, Kovaleski RF, Atherton JF, Bevan MD. Loss of Hyperdirect Pathway Cortico-Subthalamic Inputs Following Degeneration of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons. Neuron. 2017;95:1306–1318 e1305. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sanders TH, Jaeger D. Optogenetic stimulation of cortico-subthalamic projections is sufficient to ameliorate bradykinesia in 6-ohda lesioned mice. Neurobiology of disease. 2016;95:225–237. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.07.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khan ZU, et al. Dopamine D5 receptors of rat and human brain. Neuroscience. 2000;100:689–699. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(00)00274-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ciliax BJ, et al. Dopamine D(5) receptor immunolocalization in rat and monkey brain. Synapse. 2000;37:125–145. doi: 10.1002/1098-2396(200008)37:2<125::AID-SYN7>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Baufreton J, et al. D5 (not D1) dopamine receptors potentiate burst-firing in neurons of the subthalamic nucleus by modulating an L-type calcium conductance. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2003;23:816–825. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00816.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bevan MD, Bolam JP. Cholinergic, GABAergic, and glutamate-enriched inputs from the mesopontine tegmentum to the subthalamic nucleus in the rat. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1995;15:7105–7120. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-11-07105.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feger J, Bevan M, Crossman AR. The projections from the parafascicular thalamic nucleus to the subthalamic nucleus and the striatum arise from separate neuronal populations: a comparison with the corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic efferents in a retrograde fluorescent double-labelling study. Neuroscience. 1994;60:125–132. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90208-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kita T, Shigematsu N, Kita H. Intralaminar and tectal projections to the subthalamus in the rat. The European journal of neuroscience. 2016;44:2899–2908. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chu HY, Atherton JF, Wokosin D, Surmeier DJ, Bevan MD. Heterosynaptic regulation of external globus pallidus inputs to the subthalamic nucleus by the motor cortex. Neuron. 2015;85:364–376. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gotz T, et al. Functional properties of AMPA and NMDA receptors expressed in identified types of basal ganglia neurons. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 1997;17:204–215. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00204.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.D’Aoust JP, Tiberi M. Role of the extracellular amino terminus and first membrane-spanning helix of dopamine D1 and D5 receptors in shaping ligand selectivity and efficacy. Cellular signalling. 2010;22:106–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Demchyshyn LL, McConkey F, Niznik HB. Dopamine D5 receptor agonist high affinity and constitutive activity profile conferred by carboxyl-terminal tail sequence. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2000;275:23446–23455. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000157200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Tiberi M, Caron MG. High agonist-independent activity is a distinguishing feature of the dopamine D1B receptor subtype. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1994;269:27925–27931. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Beaulieu JM, Gainetdinov RR. The physiology, signaling, and pharmacology of dopamine receptors. Pharmacological reviews. 2011;63:182–217. doi: 10.1124/pr.110.002642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Holmes A, et al. Behavioral characterization of dopamine D5 receptor null mutant mice. Behavioral neuroscience. 2001;115:1129–1144. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.115.5.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cull-Candy S, Kelly L, Farrant M. Regulation of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors: synaptic plasticity and beyond. Current opinion in neurobiology. 2006;16:288–297. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shepherd GM. Corticostriatal connectivity and its role in disease. Nature reviews. Neuroscience. 2013;14:278–291. doi: 10.1038/nrn3469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Suter BA, Migliore M, Shepherd GM. Intrinsic electrophysiology of mouse corticospinal neurons: a class-specific triad of spike-related properties. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:1965–1977. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Oswald, M., Tantirigama, M., Sonntag, I., Hughes, S. & Empson, R. Diversity of layer 5 projection neurons in the mouse motor cortex. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 7, 10.3389/fncel.2013.00174 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Farries MA, Kita H, Wilson CJ. Dynamic spike threshold and zero membrane slope conductance shape the response of subthalamic neurons to cortical input. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010;30:13180–13191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1909-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yamawaki N, Magill PJ, Woodhall GL, Hall SD, Stanford IM. Frequency selectivity and dopamine-dependence of plasticity at glutamatergic synapses in the subthalamic nucleus. Neuroscience. 2012;203:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.12.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jackman SL, Beneduce BM, Drew IR, Regehr WG. Achieving high-frequency optical control of synaptic transmission. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2014;34:7704–7714. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4694-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bosch C, Mailly P, Degos B, Deniau JM, Venance L. Preservation of the hyperdirect pathway of basal ganglia in a rodent brain slice. Neuroscience. 2012;215:31–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pinheiro PS, et al. Selective Block of Postsynaptic Kainate Receptors Reveals Their Function at Hippocampal Mossy Fiber Synapses. Cerebral Cortex. 2013;23:323–331. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rommelfanger KS, Wichmann T. Extrastriatal dopaminergic circuits of the Basal Ganglia. Frontiers in neuroanatomy. 2010;4:139. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2010.00139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen KZ, Johnson SW. Presynaptic dopamine D2 and muscarine M3 receptors inhibit excitatory and inhibitory transmission to rat subthalamic neurones in vitro. The Journal of physiology. 2000;525(Pt 2):331–341. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00331.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG. Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiological reviews. 1998;78:189–225. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.1.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cragg SJ, Baufreton J, Xue Y, Bolam JP, Bevan MD. Synaptic release of dopamine in the subthalamic nucleus. The European journal of neuroscience. 2004;20:1788–1802. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03629.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Baufreton J, Bevan MD. D2-like dopamine receptor-mediated modulation of activity-dependent plasticity at GABAergic synapses in the subthalamic nucleus. The Journal of physiology. 2008;586:2121–2142. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2008.151118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Baufreton J, et al. Dopamine receptors set the pattern of activity generated in subthalamic neurons. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2005;19:1771–1777. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-3401hyp. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ramanathan S, Tkatch T, Atherton JF, Wilson CJ, Bevan MD. D2-like dopamine receptors modulate SKCa channel function in subthalamic nucleus neurons through inhibition of Cav2.2 channels. Journal of neurophysiology. 2008;99:442–459. doi: 10.1152/jn.00998.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhu ZT, Shen KZ, Johnson SW. Pharmacological identification of inward current evoked by dopamine in rat subthalamic neurons in vitro. Neuropharmacology. 2002;42:772–781. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3908(02)00035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Shen KZ, Zhu ZT, Munhall A, Johnson SW. Dopamine receptor supersensitivity in rat subthalamus after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions. The European journal of neuroscience. 2003;18:2967–2974. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.03058.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wilson CL, et al. Subthalamic nucleus neurones in slices from 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned mice show irregular, dopamine-reversible firing pattern changes, but without synchronous activity. Neuroscience. 2006;143:565–572. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Oh MC, Derkach VA, Guire ES, Soderling TR. Extrasynaptic membrane trafficking regulated by GluR1 serine 845 phosphorylation primes AMPA receptors for long-term potentiation. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2006;281:752–758. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M509677200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Esteban JA, et al. PKA phosphorylation of AMPA receptor subunits controls synaptic trafficking underlying plasticity. Nature neuroscience. 2003;6:136–143. doi: 10.1038/nn997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sun X, Zhao Y, Wolf ME. Dopamine receptor stimulation modulates AMPA receptor synaptic insertion in prefrontal cortex neurons. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2005;25:7342–7351. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4603-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schilstrom B, et al. Cocaine enhances NMDA receptor-mediated currents in ventral tegmental area cells via dopamine D5 receptor-dependent redistribution of NMDA receptors. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2006;26:8549–8558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5179-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Diering GH, Gustina AS, Huganir RL. PKA-GluA1 coupling via AKAP5 controls AMPA receptor phosphorylation and cell-surface targeting during bidirectional homeostatic plasticity. Neuron. 2014;84:790–805. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Greger IH, Watson JF, Cull-Candy SG. Structural and Functional Architecture of AMPA-Type Glutamate Receptors and Their Auxiliary Proteins. Neuron. 2017;94:713–730. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gu X, et al. GSG1L suppresses AMPA receptor-mediated synaptic transmission and uniquely modulates AMPA receptor kinetics in hippocampal neurons. Nature communications. 2016;7:10873. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Levy R, et al. Dependence of subthalamic nucleus oscillations on movement and dopamine in Parkinson’s disease. Brain: a journal of neurology. 2002;125:1196–1209. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sharott A, et al. Dopamine depletion increases the power and coherence of beta-oscillations in the cerebral cortex and subthalamic nucleus of the awake rat. The European journal of neuroscience. 2005;21:1413–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Chetrit J, et al. Inhibiting subthalamic D5 receptor constitutive activity alleviates abnormal electrical activity and reverses motor impairment in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2013;33:14840–14849. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0453-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Soudais C, Laplace-Builhe C, Kissa K, Kremer EJ. Preferential transduction of neurons by canine adenovirus vectors and their efficient retrograde transport in vivo. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2001;15:2283–2285. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0321fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Haberl, M. G. et al. An anterograde rabies virus vector for high-resolution large-scale reconstruction of 3D neuron morphology. Brain structure & function, 10.1007/s00429-014-0730-z (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 72.Ginger M, Haberl M, Conzelmann KK, Schwarz MK, Frick A. Revealing the secrets of neuronal circuits with recombinant rabies virus technology. Frontiers in neural circuits. 2013;7:2. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Smith JB, Alloway KD. Functional specificity of claustrum connections in the rat: interhemispheric communication between specific parts of motor cortex. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2010;30:16832–16844. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4438-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. San Diego: Academic Press, c2001 (2001).
  • 75.Abdi A, et al. Prototypic and arkypallidal neurons in the dopamine-intact external globus pallidus. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2015;35:6667–6688. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4662-14.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (381.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES