Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 Mar 13;18:276–284. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.013

A resource for sustainable management: De novo assembly and annotation of the liver transcriptome of the Atlantic chub mackerel, Scomber colias

André M Machado a, Mónica Felício b, Elza Fonseca b,c, Rute R da Fonseca d,, L Filipe C Castro a,c,⁎⁎
PMCID: PMC5996228  PMID: 29896516

Abstract

Mackerels represent a valuable fishery worldwide. Their ample geographic distribution and capture levels make them an insightful model to address stock management strategies in the context of global changes. Yet, and despite recent impressive genome and transcriptome sequencing efforts from teleost species, available resources from the Scombridae family are comparatively scarce. Here, we generated the first high-quality de novo assembly of the liver transcriptome of the Atlantic chub mackerel (Scomber colias). Through the use of RNA-Seq Illumina technology, 111,124,228 clean reads were obtained for the liver transcriptome. De novo assembly resulted in 93,731 transcripts with an N50 of 1462 bp. This dataset provides an important insight into the context of fisheries management.

Keywords: RNA-Seq, Scombridae, Stock management, Atlantic chub mackerel, Liver


Specifications Table

Subject area Genetics and Transcriptomics
More specific subject area Transcriptomics of Atlantic chub mackerel Liver
Type of data Raw reads of DNA sequences
How data was acquired A liver sample of Atlantic chub mackerel, Scomber colias, was collected for total RNA isolation. It was prepared paired-end library and sequenced by the Hiseq. 4000 system. The obtained data were subjected to de novo assembly and annotated using Trinotate.
Data format Raw data in FASTQ, transcriptome assembly and Final transcriptome assembly in FASTA format.
Experimental factors One specimen of S. colias was obtained from North Atlantic waters.
Experimental features The de novo assembling of the transcriptome, decontamination, filtration and the functional annotation of Atlantic chub mackerel liver was performed.
Data source location Portugal (41.501944 N 8.851667 W)
Data accessibility The raw FASTQ files were deposited in the NCBI SRA database with accession number SRX3462868 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRX3462868).
The decontaminated transcriptome assembly was deposited in the NCBI TSA database with accession number GGCI00000000.1 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/GGCI00000000.1).
The final transcriptome assembly was deposited in the figshare digital repository (https://figshare.com/s/a97f1d5b37d174d1d819).

Value of the data

  • This is the first high-quality de novo assembly of the liver transcriptome of the Atlantic chub mackerel.

  • The transcriptome results presented here pave the way for developing the appropriate tools fundamental for resource management of S. colias.

  • The on-going full genome sequence project will largely profit from this dataset at the annotation stage.

1. Data

Teleostei, an infraclass of the Actinopterygii, comprise by far the most species-rich group within the vertebrates, with more than 26,000 recognized species [1]. Their fantastic variation in morphology and physiology traits is paralleled by the plethora of colonized aquatic habitats. Moreover, teleost species are a critical component of human diets providing nutrients such as proteins and lipids, including the essential “omega 3” [2], [3]. Recently, a massive effort in the gathering of full genome sequences from 66 teleost species has been performed [2], [3]. In addition, the implementation of international collaborative initiatives with the aim to generate large-scale and comparable datasets of RNA-Seq transcriptome sequences, such as the “Transcriptomes of 1000 Fishes” (Fish-T1K; https://db.cngb.org/fisht1k/home/), is also noteworthy [4]. Mackerels from the genus Scomber comprise a substantial proportion of the total volume of captured fish worldwide [5], since they are highly appreciated by consumers. In Portugal, the Atlantic chub mackerel, Scomber colias, represents the species with the highest volume of capture recorded in 2016 (>26,000 t) [6]. Thus, the transcriptomic dataset presented here provides important information for comparative genomics across the teleost tree of life, the definition of stock management strategies, and to investigate the biology and ecology of this important economic species. The provided dataset consists of raw reads of Atlantic chub mackerel, deposited in NCBI SRA database under SRX3462868 accession number. The raw reads were de novo assembled into full-length transcriptome, that after filtration, decontamination and quality control were deposited in NCBI TSA database with GGCI00000000.1 accession number. In addition, we produced and annotated a filtered transcriptome assembly, final Transcriptome Assembly, derived from the previous one. Importantly, all steps of data treatment were supported by statistical analyses showed in several tables and figures.

2. Experimental design, materials and methods

2.1. Atlantic chub mackerel collection, sampling, and Illumina sequencing

One specimen of S. colias was obtained from North Atlantic waters during the “Programa Nacional de Amostragem Biológica” carried out by the Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera” (IPMA) (Table 1). The liver tissue was sampled immediately upon capture, stored in RNAlater, and kept at −20 °C until RNA extraction. Total RNA (RNAt) of the liver was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) with a pre-treatment with DNaseI and subsequent elution of the extracted RNAt in nuclease-free water, according to the manufacturer's protocol. A strand-specific library with an insert size of 250–300 bp was built after conversion of the high-quality liver RNAt to cDNA and sequenced using 150 bp paired-end reads on the Illumina HiSeq. 4000 platform by Novogene (China).

Table 1.

Transrate and Trinity Statistics of the original, decontaminated and final transcriptome assembly of liver transcriptome of S. colias.

Trimming & Assembly Liver tissue
Raw sequencing reads 121,656,039
Reads used in assembly 111,124,228
Percentage of reads submitted to assembly 91.34%
Assembly Versions Original transcriptome assembly Decontaminated transcriptome assembly Final transcriptome assembly
Number of “genes” 72,618 54,876 35,386
Number of transcripts 114,174 93,731 44,345
n50 transcript length (bp) 1299 1462 1288
Median transcript length (bp) 544 593 593
Mean transcript length (bp) 899 975 912
Smallest Contig 301 301 301
Largest Contig 14,405 14,405 13,899
Number of Contigs over 1k nn 30,346 28,819 12,962
Number of Contigs over 10k nn 28 26 3
GC % 45.33 45.32 46.64
Total Assembled bases 102,639,256 91,425,968 40,443,374
RMBT % 81.37%

2.2. Transcriptome data processing and de novo assembly

The raw reads of liver tissue were produced by sequencing and quality filtered by Trimmomatic [7], with parameters set to “LEADING:15 TRAILING:15 SLIDING WINDOW:4:20 MINLEN:50”. The statistics of trimming reads are shown in Table 1.

Since the reference genome of S. colias is not currently available, the Trinity v2.4.0 software was used for de novo assembly [8]. We applied the software following the protocol from Hass and colleagues [9], with exception of the strand-specific data and minimum length contig parameters (SS_lib_type RF; min_contig_length 300).

To check the raw assembled contigs for contamination, the assembled transcriptome was queried in the MCSC decontamination pipeline [10] with the following parameters: LVL =5; TAXO_LVL=superclass; WHITE_NAME= Actinopterygii, and all contigs with a match to Actinopterygii sequences of Uniref90 database were kept. The remaining contigs with a match to other taxa or without hits at all, were re-blasted against the nucleotide database (NT) of NCBI, with an E-value cut-off of 1e-5. Again, contigs having top hits outside of Actinopterygii taxa were excluded, while the contigs without hits at all were retained. To check and remove vector sequences, adapter and linkers, not previously identified, we also filtered the assembled transcripts against the UniVec database. Any sequences of our assembly with a strong match against UniVec database (1/1,000,000 chance of a random match for queries of 350 Kb, terminal match score ≥24, internal match score ≥30) were removed.

To decrease the isoform redundancy of the clean assembly, the tr2aacds pipeline, from the Evidential – Gene package (http://arthropods.eugenes.org/EvidentialGene/), was used. This pipeline reduces redundancy by selecting the ‘optimal’ set of assembled transcripts, based on coding potential. For each filtration stage of the assembly, the Trinity and Transrate [11] statistics are shown in the Table 1. Furthermore, and despite the redundancy removal and decontamination clean-up steps in the initial stages, the rate of reads mapped back to transcripts (RMBT) as well the distribution length of final assembled sequences was calculated and plotted as a measure of assembly quality (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Length distribution of the final transcriptome contigs. The x-axis represents the length, and the y-axis represents the number of Contigs.

To assess the completeness of our transcriptome, in terms of gene content, the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs tool (BUSCO) was used [12].The statistics of complete BUSCO hits against the eukaryota and metazoa lineage-specific profile libraries are provided in Table 2.

Table 2.

BUSCO statistics of completeness of S. colias Liver final transcriptome assembly against the metazoa and eukaryota gene sets.

BUSCO Statistics Metazoa DB (%) Eukaryota DB (%)
Complete 82.90 83.20
Single 73.60 71.60
Multi 9.30 11.60
Fragment 13.00 13.20
Missing 4.10 3.60

2.3. Functional annotation

The functional annotation was performed in two independent steps. Firstly, the final transcriptome assembly was queried against the non-redundant (NR) database of NCBI, through the blastx tool of DIAMOND v0.8.36 software [13] and applying an E-value cut-off of 1e-5. The top 30 species with the blastx best hits are provided in Table 3. To facilitate the visualization, only the top 15 best blast hits are plotted in the species distribution in Fig. 2A. Moreover, and to strengthen the blast analysis, the E-value and sequence similarity distributions were also tabulated and displayed in Fig. 2B and C and in Table 4, Table 5.

Table 3.

The top 30 species for which there was a top blastx hit. These blastx results from the queried of final transcriptome assembly against Non-Redundant Database of NCBI.

Specie Taxon ID Number of blastx Hits Percentage of blastx Hits (%)
Lates calcarifer 8187 8,503 28.20
Larimichthys crocea 215358 4,696 15.58
Stegastes partitus 144197 2,683 8.90
Acanthochromis polyacanthus 80966 2,597 8.61
Labrus bergylta 56723 1,447 4.80
Paralichthys olivaceus 8255 1,346 4.46
Monopterus albus 43700 1,270 4.21
Oreochromis niloticus 8128 822 2.73
Notothenia coriiceps 8208 551 1.83
Neolamprologus brichardi 32507 431 1.43
Haplochromis burtoni 8153 375 1.24
Dicentrarchus labrax 13489 322 1.07
Cyprinodon variegatus 28743 290 0.96
Maylandia zebra 106582 262 0.87
Hippocampus comes 109280 256 0.85
Fundulus heteroclitus 8078 255 0.85
Cynoglossus semilaevis 244447 220 0.73
Kryptolebias marmoratus 37003 205 0.68
Austrofundulus limnaeus 52670 203 0.67
Oryzias latipes 8090 199 0.66
Nothobranchius furzeri 105023 175 0.58
Poecilia latipinna 48699 164 0.54
Boleophthalmus pectinirostris 150288 152 0.50
Tetraodon nigroviridis 99883 151 0.50
Pundamilia nyererei 303518 144 0.48
Oncorhynchus mykiss 8022 142 0.47
Poecilia mexicana 48701 142 0.47
Takifugu rubripes 31033 139 0.46
Cyprinus carpio 7962 133 0.44
Oplegnathus fasciatus 163134 120 0.40

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Blastx analysis of Scomber colias final transcriptome assembly. (A) Homologous gene-species distribution (B) E-value distribution, (C) Similarity distribution.

Table 4.

E-value distribution of blastx hits of final transcriptome assembly against NR database.

E-values Ranges Number of blastx Hits Percentage of blastx Hits (%)
0 ~ 1e-100 10492 34.80
1e-100 ~ 1e-60 7057 23.41
1e-60 ~ 1e-45 4366 14.48
1e-45 ~ 1e-30 3667 12.16
1e-30 ~ 1e-15 2899 9.62
1e-15 ~ 1e-5 1667 5.53

Table 5.

Similarity distribution of blastx hits of final transcriptome assembly against NR database.

Similarity Ranges (%) Number of blastx Hits Percentage of blastx Hits (%)
20 ~ 40 15 0.05
40 ~ 60 660 2.19
60 ~ 80 4212 13.97
80 ~ 90 5949 19.73
90 ~ 95 5859 19.43
95 ~ 100 13453 44.62

In the second step, the nucleotide sequences of the final transcriptome were submitted to the Trinotate v3.0.1 (http://trinotate.github.io). Into Trinotate pipeline were used several annotation software such as Transdecoder (http://transdecoder.github.io), Hmmer v.3.1b1 [14], PFAM [15], TMHMM v.2.0c [16], GOseq [17] and eggNOG v.3.0 [18] to perform the functional annotation of transcriptome. Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using the Transdecoder. Obtained ORFs were blasted using the blastp tool of DIAMOND v0.8.36 software [13] against the NCBI NR, Uniref90, and SwissProt databases with an E-value cut-off of 1e-5. To avoid statistical gene overrepresentation, when more than one isoform per ‘gene’ remained after filtering with the tr2aacds pipeline, only the top representative of each ‘gene’ was selected for further analysis. To belong to the final subset of unigenes, a sequence would have to obey the following criteria (in this order): 1) codify an ORF, 2) display a blastx or blastp hit in at least one of the 3 chosen databases (NR, Swissprot, Uniref90), 3) represent the longest ORF per ‘gene’. The annotation statistics of final transcriptome assembly and final transcriptome subset can be consulted in Table 6. Additionally, the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) screening was performed using the eggNOG database, integrated within the Trinotate pipeline. The COG distribution is available in Fig. 3.

Table 6.

Functional annotation categories and statistics for final transcriptome assembly and for a subset of unigenes.

Trinotate Annotation Statistics Final transcriptome assembly Final Transcriptome Subset
Number of “genes” with ORF 21,981
Number of “Unigenes” with ORF 21,981
Number of transcripts with ORF 27,772 21,981
Transcripts with blastx match NR 27,426 21,707
Transcripts with blastp match NR 26,780 21,215
Transcripts with blastx match Uniref90 27,519 21,791
Transcripts with blastp match Uniref90 26,889 21,307
Transcripts with blastx match SwissProt 23,927 18,867
Transcripts with blastp match SwissProt 24,086 19,013
Transcripts with GO terms 23,550 18,567
Transcripts with KeggPathways 21,247 16,911
Transcripts with eggNOG/COG 21,005 16,754
Transcripts with PFAM 18,885 14,557

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Histogram of the clusters of orthologous groups (COG).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the North Portugal Regional Operational Program (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) that supported this research through the Northern Regional Operational Program (NORTE2020) through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), under the Framework of the Structured Program of R&D&I INNOVMAR - Innovation and Sustainability in the Management and Exploitation of Marine Resources (Reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000035), within the Research Line ECOSERVICES. EF was funded by the FCT (SFRH/BD/100262/2014). This dataset is part of the CIIMAR-lead initiative Portugal-Fishomics. The biological material used here was collected under the project Programa Nacional de Amostragem Biológica - IPMA.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2018.03.013.

Contributor Information

Rute R. da Fonseca, Email: rfonseca@bi.ku.dk.

L. Filipe C. Castro, Email: filipe.castro@ciimar.up.pt.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (13.8KB, docx)

.

References

  • 1.Nelson S.J. Fishes of the world. Fifth edit. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.A: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Castro L.F.C., Tocher D.R., Monroig O. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis in chordates: Insights into the evolution of Fads and Elovl gene repertoire. Prog. Lipid Res. 2016;62:25–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.J. Sargent, D. Tocher, J. Bell, The lipids, Fish Nutr. (3rd Ed181–257. doi: 10.1016/B978-012319652-1/50005-7, 2002. [DOI]
  • 4.Sun Y., Huang Y., Li X., Baldwin C.C., Zhou Z., Yan Z., Crandall K.A., Zhang Y., Zhao X., Wang M., Wong A., Fang C., Zhang X., Huang H., Lopez J.V., Kilfoyle K., Zhang Y., Ortí G., Venkatesh B., Shi Q. Fish-T1K (Transcriptomes of 1,000 Fishes) Project: large-scale transcriptome data for fish evolution studies. Gigascience. 2016;5:18. doi: 10.1186/s13742-016-0124-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), Fishery statistical collection. Global capture production. Retrieved from 〈https://www.fao.org〉, 2007.
  • 6.DGRM (Direção - Geral de Recursos Naturais, Segurança e Serviços Marítimos), Plano Estratégico para a Aquicultura Portuguesa 2014–2020. Retrieved from 〈https://www.dgrm.mm.gov.pt〉, 2017.
  • 7.Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grabherr M.G., Haas B.J., Yassour M., Levin J.Z., Thompson D.A., Amit I., Adiconis X., Fan L., Raychowdhury R., Zeng Q., Chen Z., Mauceli E., Hacohen N., Gnirke A., Rhind N., di Palma F., Birren B.W., Nusbaum C., Lindblad-Toh K., Friedman N., Regev A. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011;29:644–652. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haas B.J., Papanicolaou A., Yassour M., Grabherr M., Blood P.D., Bowden J., Couger M.B., Eccles D., Li B., Lieber M. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-Seq: reference generation and analysis with Trinity. Nat. Protoc. 2013;8 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lafond-Lapalme J., Duceppe M.O., Wang S., Moffett P., Mimee B. A new method for decontamination of de novo transcriptomes using a hierarchical clustering algorithm. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:1293–1300. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smith-Unna R., Boursnell C., Patro R., Hibberd J.M., Kelly S. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies. Genome Res. 2016;26:1134–1144. doi: 10.1101/gr.196469.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Simão F.A., Waterhouse R.M., Ioannidis P., Kriventseva E.V., Zdobnov E.M. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3210–3212. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Buchfink B., Xie C., Huson D.H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods. 2014;12:59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Finn R.D., Clements J., Eddy S.R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29–W37. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Punta M., Coggill P.C., Eberhardt R.Y., Mistry J., Tate J., Boursnell C., Pang N., Forslund K., Ceric G., Clements J., Heger A., Holm L., Sonnhammer E.L.L., Eddy S.R., Bateman A., Finn R.D. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D290–D301. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krogh A., Larsson B., von Heijne G., Sonnhammer E.L. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden markov model: application to complete genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 2001;305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ashburner M., Ball C.A., Blake J.A., Botstein D., Butler H., Cherry J.M., Davis A.P., Dolinski K., Dwight S.S., Eppig J.T., Harris M.A., Hill D.P., Issel-Tarver L., Kasarskis A., Lewis S., Matese J.C., Richardson J.E., Ringwald M., Rubin G.M., Sherlock G. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 2000;25:25–29. doi: 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Powell S., Szklarczyk D., Trachana K., Roth A., Kuhn M., Muller J., Arnold R., Rattei T., Letunic I., Doerks T., Jensen L.J., von Mering C., Bork P. eggNOG v3.0: orthologous groups covering 1133 organisms at 41 different taxonomic ranges. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D284-9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (13.8KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES