Abstract
Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominantly inherited connective tissue disorder, mostly caused by mutations in the fibrillin-1 (FBN1) gene. We, by using targeted next-generation sequence analysis, identified a novel intronic FBN1 mutation (the c.2678-15C>A variant) in a MFS patient with aortic dilatation. The computational predictions showed that the heterozygous c.2678-15C>A intronic variant might influence the splicing process by differentially affecting canonical versus cryptic splice site utilization within intron 22 of the FBN1 gene. RT-PCR and Western blot analyses, using FBN1 minigenes transfected into HeLa and COS-7 cells, revealed that the c.2678-15C>A variant disrupts normal splicing of intron 22 leading to aberrant 13-nt intron 22 inclusion, frameshift, and premature termination codon. Collectively, the results strongly suggest that the c.2678-15C>A variant could lead to haploinsufficiency of the FBN1 functional protein and structural connective tissue fragility in MFS complicated by aorta dilation, a finding that further expands on the genetic basis of aortic pathology.
1. Introduction
Aberrant pre-mRNA splicing is a frequent cause of human genetic disease and, according to some estimates, mutations affecting splicing comprise up to 60% of all disease-causing mutations in human genes [1, 2]. Molecular diagnostics, particularly with implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms, continues to identify new causative mutations for rare genetic disorders such as Marfan syndrome (MFS) that is often crucial for appropriate patient management as well as for genetic risk assessment in families.
MFS is a heritable connective tissue disorder with clinical pathological manifestations in the skeletal, ocular, cardiovascular, and other systems [3]. In MFS, the development of structural cardiovascular alterations such as aortic aneurysms, mitral valve prolapse, dilated cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmia greatly contributes to patient morbidity and early mortality [4]. In situations of clinical uncertainty or presymptomatic counseling [5], molecular genetic testing and outcome predictions are an integral part of the diagnostic decision process [6–8].
MFS is often associated with and caused by numerous mutations (1847 currently reported, www.umd.be/FBN1/) in the fibrillin-1 (FBN1) gene [9, 10]. A fast-track FBN1 mutation screening has therefore become a logical approach to add meaning to the clinical MFS diagnosis, recognition of at-risk cardiovascular MFS patients, and family planning counseling [11]. In fact, diagnostic screening identified a wide spectrum of pathogenic FBN1 mutations in MFS, resulting in FBN1 haploinsufficiency [8, 12]. However, for a substantial proportion of patients with MFS clinical phenotypes, DNA sequencing restricted to FBN1 exons failed to identify putatively pathogenic mutations. In some of these situations, qualitative analysis of the FBN1 mRNA in dermal fibroblasts from MFS patients revealed aberrant FBN1 pseudoexon inclusions due to intronic mutations which activate cryptic splice sites [13–17].
We describe a patient with a diagnosis of MFS where there is no mutation identified in the FBN1 coding sequence. Targeted NGS of the genomic DNA from this patient revealed a novel variant located in intron 22 of the FBN1 gene. The results of both in silico and functional studies using minigene splicing assays strongly suggest that this variant leads to a cryptic acceptor splice site activation and subsequent frame shift and premature termination codon (PTC) in exon 23.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patient Information
The index patient was a 32-year-old male with MFS. Clinical findings included aortic root dilatation (41 mm aortic sinus, 44 mm or 2.17cm/m2 ascending aorta), ectopia lentis, and typical skeletal manifestations. His father had aortic dilatation and died in his forties due to endocarditis after the implantation of an aortic prosthesis. His mother, his brother, and one paternal aunt were clinically unaffected. Since no relevant mutation was identified in a previous genetic study limited to exons and close flanking intronic regions of the FBN1 gene, the patient requested a new evaluation as he and his couple were considering the possibility of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Three nonaffected patient's relatives as well as 4752 individuals with phenotypes other than MFS were also genetically tested. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study. The project was approved by each local ethics committee.
2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction
The patient's and relative's genomic DNA was extracted from saliva samples collected with the DNA Sample Collection Kit OG-500 (Oragene), on the QIAsymphony SP robot using the QIAsymphony DNA midi Kit (Qiagen). Purified genomic DNA was quantified using Nanodrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and DNA integrity was determined on the 2200 TapeStation (Agilent Technologies) following the manufacturer's recommendation.
2.3. Next-Generation Sequencing
Custom probe RNA baits (120 nucleotides) for NGS were designed using Agilent's SureDesign online tool to cover all exons and exon/intron boundaries of the human FBN1 gene. In addition, another 34 genes included in the Health in Code panel (see the Genetic Testing Registry at NCBI, Test ID: GTR000530671.1, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/tests/530671) related to aortic diseases and phenocopies were NGS analyzed. For NGS library construction, patient genomic DNA (3 μg) was sheared into 150-200 bp fragments by Covaris E220 focused-ultrasonicator. Preparation and capture of NGS libraries were performed on the Bravo instrument (Agilent Technologies) following the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA libraries were normalized to 10 nM and then pooled for multiplexed sequencing (HiSeq 1500, Illumina). Filtering of variants was performed using in-house data sets, the database of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/, build 132), Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, http://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/index.php), and the Health in Code database. In order to confirm the FBN1 variants identified by NGS, a standard PCR amplification and bidirectional Sanger sequencing were performed. In silico analysis of identified variants was performed using the splicing prediction module of the Alamut Visual v.2.9.0 software (Interactive Biosoftware), running five independent algorithms for splice signal detection: SpliceSiteFinder-like (SSF), MaxEntScan (MES), NNSPLICE (NNS), GeneSplicer (GSP), and Human Splicing Finder (HSF).
2.4. Generation of Allelic Minigene Constructs
FBN1 allelic minigene fragments (2798 bp), including either the reference (Ref) or mutated (Mut) sequence, have been generated by PCR using the patient genomic DNA as template, Phusion Hot Start II high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), and primers 516-519 (Table 1). The agarose-gel purified PCR fragments were cloned into a linearized dual tagged (N-terminal 3xFLAG and C-terminal c-Myc) expression vector (p3xFLAG-Myc-CMV-26, Sigma) as detailed in Supp. Figure 1A. Plasmids grown in XL1-Blue Supercompetent E. coli cells (Stratagene) were purified by using a PureLink HiPure plasmid filter purification kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. All the FBN1 constructs were verified by full-length insert sequencing (for primers, see Table 1). Plasmid 1283 was selected as the FBN1-Ref minigene, and plasmid 1288 was selected as the FBN1-Mut minigene (Supp. Figure 1B). Plasmids were formulated at a final DNA concentration of 1 mg/ml in sterile isotonic saline.
Table 1.
Primer | Target | F/R | Application | Sequence (5′-3′) | PCR product | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
516 | FBN1 | e22 | F | PCR cloning (Not I) | GTC TGC GGC CGC GAC CAT CAA GGG CAC TTG CTG GC | 516-519: 2798 bp |
519 | FBN1 | e24 | R | PCR cloning (EcoRV) | CAG CGA TAT CAC AAG ACA GAT CCT TCC TGT GGC ATC | |
523 | FBN1 | i22 | F | Sequencing | GTG AAT GCT GGA GGC CAT GAG AT | |
524 | FBN1 | i23 | F | Sequencing | CTT CAC AGG GAG AAA TAT GCA GCA GA | |
525 | FBN1 | i23 | F | Sequencing | CTC CAT TAG GCA AAC TGG GAA GGA | |
480 | Vector | 5′UTR | F | Sequencing | GCA GAG CTC GTT TAG TGA ACC GTC | |
481 | Vector | 3′UTR | R | Sequencing | GCA ACT TCC AGG GCC AGG AG | |
521 | FBN1 | e22 | F | RT-PCR | ACC ATC AAG GGC ACT TGC TGG C | |
530 | Vector | c-Myc | R | RT-PCR | CCT CAC AGA TCC TCT TCT GAG ATG AGT | 521-530: 374 bp |
36 | RPL19 | e2-3 | F | RT-PCR | AAC TCC CGT CAG CAG ATC CG | |
65 | RPL19 | e6 | R | RT-PCR | CTT GGT CTC TTC CTC CTT GGA | 36-65: 480 bp |
528 | Vector | FLAG | F | RT-PCR | ATG GAC TAC AAA GAC CAT GAC GGT GA | |
533 | FBN1 | e23-22 | R | RT-PCR | CCA CAT ATG GGA TCA ACT TGG CAT AG | 528-533: 230 bp |
535 | FBN1 | e23-i22 | R | RT-PCR | CCT TTA CCA CAT ATG GGA TCT GTA ATA AAA AG | 528-535: 250 bp |
2.5. Cell Culture and Transfection In Vitro
HeLa (an epithelial cell line derived from human cervical epithelioid carcinoma, passage +4) and COS-7 (a fibroblast-like cell line derived from African green monkey kidney tissue, passage +5) were purchased from the European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (Sigma). Cells were trypsinized at 70–80% confluence, cell numbers were determined using an automated cell counter (Countess, Invitrogen), and 100,000 HeLa or 60,000 COS-7 cells/well were plated in 12-well culture plates, allowed to attach overnight, and transiently transfected with 1.0 μg of plasmid DNA. All transfections were carried out with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. For each plasmid, four separate transfection assays were employed, and in each assay transfections were performed in duplicate. The transfection efficiency, evaluated by cotransfection with a CMV-EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) vector followed by fluorescent microscopy, was 70-80%. Equivalent transfection efficiency was verified by cotransfection with a plasmid coding for the N-terminal 3xFLAG-tagged bacterial alkaline phosphatase (BAP) fusion protein (p3XFLAG-CMV-7-BAP, Sigma) followed by Western blot detection with an anti-FLAG antibody. Additional controls included mock and empty vector-transfected cells. In some experiments, the transfected cells were incubated with the cell-permeable proteasome inhibitor MG132 (Sigma) or dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma) vehicle for 7 hours. The cells were harvested at 24–48 hours after transfection and processed for RNA and protein extraction.
2.6. Semiquantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted by RNeasy-Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol, subjected to column digestion of DNA with RNase-free DNase (Qiagen), and reverse transcribed using SuperScript IV (Invitrogen) and oligo-dT primers. Semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed in a Biometra II system using the RPL19 gene (coding for ribosomal L19 protein) for normalization of RT-PCR data [18]. The amount of cDNA and the number of cycles were varied for each primer pair (see Table 1) to ensure amplification within the linear phase. Reactions, including non-RT control and nontemplate control, were performed at least in triplicate. PCR products were visualized on 2% agarose gels by ethidium bromide staining and band intensity was estimated by densitometry (VersaDoc 1000) and Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
2.7. SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting
Cell samples were homogenized and solubilized in standard 2X Laemmli buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Following centrifugation at 20,000 g for 30 minutes, the concentration of supernatant proteins was analyzed using the Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Extracted proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE (Mini-Protean-III, Bio-Rad), stained with Coomassie or blotted onto PVDF membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham Bioscience), and probed with mouse monoclonal anti-Myc or anti-FLAG antibodies (Sigma). Molecular weight (MW) standards (MARK-12 and SeeBlue Plus2 from Invitrogen) were included on each gel. Equivalence of protein loading was confirmed by Amido Black staining of blots after immunodetection. Blocking, washing, incubation with diluted primary and secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (Sigma), and visualization of immunodecorated bands by the Super-Signal West Pico PLUS chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Scientific) were carried out as previously described [19].
3. Results
DNA from patient saliva was used for FBN1 gene targeted NGS analysis with in-house analysis pipeline. Paired end sequencing covered nearly 34,000 bases of FBN1 encompassing 66 exons along with their flanking (200 bp) intron regions. A total of 8 variants of FBN1 were identified with high variant-calling stringency including 7 variants localized in intronic noncoding regions and one synonymous exonic variant which does not influence the amino acid structure of the protein (Table 2). All variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. It is worth noting that the identified variants, with the exception of the heterozygous c.2678-15C>A, have been previously described in the database of short genetic variation (dbSNP) and classified as benign or uncertain in the ClinVar database. NGS coverage analysis metrics across the region of interest for FBN1 allowed for the identification of the heterozygous c.2678-15C>A variant which are shown in Supp. Figure S2. The c.2678-15C>A variant was not identified by Sanger sequencing in any of the three clinically unaffected patient's relatives. This variant was also not detected in the control population consisting of 4752 individuals with phenotypes other than MFS who were referred to the Health in Code laboratory for NGS analysis. In addition, our NGS screening of a panel of 34 genes related to aortic diseases or involved in the differential diagnosis of MFS did not reveal any pathogenic variant in the case patient.
Table 2.
FBN1 variant compared to RS: | Location | Zygosity | SNP ID | Frequency 1 | Splicing 2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NC_000015.10 | NM_000138.4 | ||||||
1 | g.48610929A>G | c.248-103T>C | intron 3 | HZ | rs1018148 | 0,932343 | NA |
2 | g.48537938C>G | c.539-130G>C | intron 6 | HTZ | rs147780575 | NR | NA |
3 | g.48494269G>T | c.2678-15C>A | intron 22 | HTZ | NR | NR | A4 |
4 | g.48488453G>A | c.3123C>T5 | exon 26 | HTZ | rs576395584 | 0.00001 | NA |
5 | g.48444487A>T | c.6037+54T>A | intron 49 | HZ | rs2303502 | 0.22331 | NA |
6 | g.48437451T>C | c.6314-64A>G | intron 51 | HZ | rs2042746 | 0.39285 | NA |
7 | g.48428329G>C | c.6997+17C>G | intron 57 | HZ | rs363832 | 0.27742 | NA |
8 | g.48421799G>T | c.7571-113C>A | intron 61 | HZ | rs1820488 | 0,813073 | NA |
RS: reference sequence; g.: genomic; c.: coding DNA; HZ: homozygous; HTZ: heterozygous; NR: not registered; NA: not affected; A: affected.
1Population frequency from gnomAD (Genome Aggregation Database) except 3from dbSNP.
2Alamut Visual v.2.9 predictions.
4Activation of a cryptic acceptor splice site at c.2678-13 (see Figure 3).
5NP_000129.3:p.(His1041=).
To verify the potential role of FBN1 variants identified by NGS screening, we used the Alamut Visual predictive software. The computational predictions showed that only the heterozygous c.2678-15C>A intronic variant might influence the splicing process by differentially affecting canonical versus cryptic slice site utilization (Figure 1). Relative to the canonical acceptor site c.2678 of the human FBN1, MES and GSP programs, respectively, showed a score reduction of approximately 30% and 50% for the c.2678-15C>A intronic variant as compared to reference sequence, while the score values calculated by the remaining three programs (SSF, NNS, and HSF) were estimated to be unaltered (Figure 1(b)). As concerns the cryptic splice site c.2678-13, in contrast, all five Alamut algorithms predicted with high probability (see Figure 1(c)) that the c.2678-15C>A intronic variant would activate a cryptic acceptor splice site within intron 22, at position 13 nucleotides (nt) prior to exon 23.
Taken together, these results strongly suggested that the c.2678-15C>A intronic variant induces a cryptic splice site in intron 22 of the FBN1 gene that in turn could lead to an inefficient recognition of canonical splice site, giving rise to a frameshift and premature termination codon (PTC) in the FBN1 mRNA.
To investigate the effect of the FBN1 splice site variant c.2678-15C>A at the RNA and protein level, we used a minigene approach with reference (Ref) and mutant (Mut) expression plasmids containing the FBN1 fragments which were amplified from the patient genomic DNA (see Supp. Figure S1). Each plasmid was transfected into HeLa and COS-7 cells for transient expression. RT-PCR amplifications of the mini-Ref transcript with different primer sets yielded single bands of the expected size (Figure 2(b); 374 bp bands) corresponding to the normal inclusion of exons 22, 23, and 24, with introns 22 and 23 having been removed. The sequencing of these RT-PCR products confirmed that the introns were removed and the exons were correctly ligated together (Figure 2(c) and Supp. Figure S3A). In contrast, slightly longer 387 bp bands were PCR amplified from HeLa and COS-7 cells transfected with the mini-Mut plasmid (see Figure 2(b)). These RT-PCR products were eluted from the gel and sequenced. The 387 bp mini-Mut band included exon 22, a part (13 nt) of intron 22, and exons 23 and 24 (see Figure 2(c) and Supp. Figure S3B). The results indicated that the FBN1 c.2678-15C>A variant affects splicing by promoting the insertion of a 13-nt intron 22-derived sequence in the FBN1 transcript due to activation of a cryptic splice site localized at c. 2678-13. A more detailed PCR analysis using primers located inside the intron 22-derived insertion (Figure 2(c)) revealed that the aberrantly spliced transcript was expressed in HeLa and COS-7 cells transfected with the mini-Mut plasmid being not detected in cell transfectants expressing mini-Ref plasmids (Figures 2(d) and 2(e)). The latter supports the suggestion that the FBN1 c.2678-15C>A variant could lead to haploinsufficiency of full-length FBN1 protein.
Overall, the data demonstrated that the c.2678-15C>A variant can repress recognition of the canonical splice site in intron 22 of the FBN1 gene causing a shift from canonical toward cryptic splicing that can lead to insertion of a 13-nt intron 22-derived sequence, frameshift, and the creation of a PTC (see Supp. Figure 3B). Following the standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants [20], the FBN1 c.2678-15C>A mutation was classified as pathogenic (see Supp. Table S1) and submitted to the ClinVar database at NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) with the accession number SCV000611711.
The relative level of transcripts produced in the mini-Ref-containing cells was comparable with that observed in cells transfected with the mini-Mut construct (see Figure 2(b)), suggesting that the aberrantly spliced transcripts may escape, at least partly, from a nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) under our experimental conditions.
To verify whether these aberrantly spliced transcripts are translated into protein products, we performed SDS-PAGE and Western blotting of protein lysates of HeLa and COS-7 cells transfected with FLAG/Myc-tagged mini-Ref and mini-Mut plasmids. The 18 kDa bands were detected by both anti-FLAG and anti-Myc antibodies in HeLa (Figure 3(a)) and COS-7 (Figure 3(b)) cells expressing the mini-Ref plasmid 1283. Their apparent molecular weight (MW) values (18 kDa) were found to acceptably match the deduced MW sum of the mini-Ref FBN1 sequence, three FLAG and one c-Myc tags (i.e., 16.6 kDa, see Figure 4(b)). Surprisingly, neither the 18-kDa band nor any others were detectable in cells transfected with the mini-Mut plasmid 1288 (see Figure 3) although these cell transfectants produced high levels of the aberrantly spliced transcript (see Figure 2).
It is widely accepted that aberrant proteins can be rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). To determine whether inhibition of the UPS may influence the detection of proteins from the aberrantly spliced transcripts, we performed an analysis of proteasome inhibitor MG132 treatment of HeLa cells transfected with mini-Ref and mini-Mut constructs containing three FBN1 exons with flanking introns. Western blot revealed that MG132 treatment rescues protein expression of the mini-Mut construct in, respectively, transfected cells to levels comparable to those observed in the cells transfected with the mini-Ref plasmid; this rescue effect was dose-dependent (Figure 4). As might be expected in the presence of a PTC in the aberrant transcript (see Supp. Figure S3B), the corresponding protein band was of a lower MW in comparison with that of the correctly processed mini-Ref construct, i.e., 9 kDa versus 18 kDa, respectively (see Figure 4(a)). Notably, these apparent MW values estimated by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were very similar to their respective deduced MW values (see Figure 4(b)). Anti-Myc detection did not reveal the expression of the 9 kDa alternative protein in the mutant transfected cells (data not shown) because the FBN1 c.2678-15C>A variant produced, as predicted, a frame shift and PTC within exon 23. Because of the PTC, the Myc-coding region will not be read-through.
4. Discussion
Our study adds to the mutational spectrum of the FBN1 gene in MFS. Using a previously unrecognized variant in intron 22 of the FBN1 gene (c.2678-15C>A), revealed by targeted NGS in a MFS patient, we demonstrate, as a proof-of-concept, that this variant causes aberrant splicing, frameshift, and PTC. This pathogenic variant induces aberrant FBN1 pre-mRNA splicing by the generation of a new cryptic acceptor site that outcompetes the canonical splice site. The single nucleotide C to A change in intron 22 of the FBN1 is, therefore, considered clinically relevant to MFS. In contrast, the known C to T nucleotide substitution at the same site (i.e., c.2678-15C>T, rs181681840) is not expected to have any clinical significance because its population frequency (1% in the African population; gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/15-48786466-G-A) is not consistent with MFS incidence data (approximately 1 case per 5000 individuals [14]), and multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene product; the variant c.2678-15C>T is classified as benign in ClinVar (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/137303).
Point mutation variants that affect FBN1 pre-mRNA splicing represent approximately 10% of reported FBN1 mutations in patients with MFS [12] and are frequently associated with aortic wall alterations [13]. The accumulated data clearly indicate that splice mutations located besides the FBN1 exon-coding area and canonical exon's splice site motifs also play an important role in MFS [21]. In particular, it was found that patients suffering from MFS can carry FBN1 intronic variants resulting in cryptic splicing and exonization of intronic sequences at the transcript level [13–16, 22].
In this work, we identified a new intronic variant (c.2678-15C>A) of the FBN1 gene in a patient with a classic MFS phenotype. The mutation was not identified in his unaffected mother, brother, and paternal aunt and could have been inherited from his deceased father who was retrospectively considered as very likely affected by MFS.
We showed, using minigene functional assays followed by sequencing, that this variant leads to the exonization (insertion) of a part of the intron 22 sequence into FBN1 transcripts by aberrant splicing. The insertion leads to frameshift and creates a PTC in exon 23 (see Supp. Figure S3). Mechanistically viewed, this PTC would unlikely be expected to direct the corresponding transcript(s) to NMD, because it is located in a NMD-insensitive region, less than 50 nt upstream of the 3′-most exon-exon junction measured after splicing [23]. Our data strongly suggest that aberrantly spliced transcripts carrying this PTC, located 38 nt upstream of the junction between exons 23 and 24 in the spliced minigene (Supp. Figure S3B), could escape NMD in transfected cells and express unstable truncated proteins which were only detectable upon proteasome inhibition with MG132.
Although as yet unproved, we believe that the c.2678-15C>A variant would lead to haploinsufficiency of the FBN1 functional protein and structural connective tissue fragility. Our NGS analysis did not reveal any relevant change in a panel of 34 additional genes related to aortic diseases or involved in the differential diagnosis of MFS, supporting the assumption that the c.2678-15C>A variant of the FBN1 can be considered as a main disease-causing variant in the case patient.
5. Conclusion
The intronic c.2678-15C>A substitution has not previously been reported, representing therefore a novel FBN1 gene variant in MFS. Our results demonstrate that the identified intronic variant disrupting normal FBN1 mRNA splicing is a MFS-associated mutation that should be taken into account in the diagnosis of patients with MFS. On the basis of our results, we suggest that the clinical phenotype associated with the intronic c.2678-15C>A variant is caused by a reduction of wild-type FBN1 protein. Our findings and others highlight the potential importance of intronic FBN1 variants in causing MFS as well as the continued need for identifying noncoding mutations in the FBN1 gene.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the test patient and relatives for participating in this study. This work was supported by the Autonomic Government of Galicia, Spain (Grant no. GRC 2013/061).
Data Availability
All data are presented in the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Materials
References
- 1.Hammond S. M., Wood M. J. A. Genetic therapies for RNA mis-splicing diseases. Trends in Genetics. 2011;27(5):196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang J., Zhang J., Li K., Zhao W., Cui Q. SpliceDisease database: Linking RNA splicing and disease. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40(1):D1055–D1059. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ramirez F., Caescu C., Wondimu E., Galatioto J. Marfan syndrome; A connective tissue disease at the crossroads of mechanotransduction, TGFβ signaling and cell stemness. Matrix Biology. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cook J. R., Carta L., Galatioto J., Ramirez F. Cardiovascular manifestations in marfan syndrome and related diseases; multiple genes causing similar phenotypes. Clinical Genetics. 2015;87(1):11–20. doi: 10.1111/cge.12436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cãadas V., Vilacosta I., Bruna I., Fuster V. Marfan syndrome. Part 1: pathophysiology and diagnosis. Nature Reviews Cardiology. 2010;7(5):256–265. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Robinson P. N., Arteaga-Solis E., Baldock C., et al. The molecular genetics of Marfan syndrome and related disorders. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2006;43(10):769–787. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.039669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arslan-Kirchner M., Arbustini E., Boileau C., et al. Clinical utility gene card for: Marfan syndrome type 1 and related phenotypes [FBN1] European Journal of Human Genetics. 2010;18(9):p. 1070. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Franken R., Heesterbeek T. J., De Waard V., et al. Diagnosis and genetics of Marfan syndrome. Expert Opinion on Orphan Drugs. 2014;2(10):1049–1062. doi: 10.1517/21678707.2014.950223. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ramachandra C. J. A., Mehta A., Guo K. W. Q., Wong P., Tan J. L., Shim W. Molecular pathogenesis of Marfan syndrome. International Journal of Cardiology. 2015;187(1):585–591. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sakai L. Y., Keene D. R., Renard M., De Backer J. FBN1: The disease-causing gene for Marfan syndrome and other genetic disorders. Gene. 2016;592(1):279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2016.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Faivre L., Collod-Beroud G., Loeys B. L., et al. Effect of mutation type and location on clinical outcome in 1,013 probands with Marfan syndrome or related phenotypes and FBN1 mutations: an international study. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2007;81(3):454–466. doi: 10.1086/520125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeyer K. A., Reinhardt D. P. Engineered mutations in fibrillin-1 leading to Marfan syndrome act at the protein, cellular and organismal levels. Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research. 2015;765:7–18. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baudhuin L. M., Kotzer K. E., Lagerstedt S. A. Increased frequency of FBN1 truncating and splicing variants in Marfan syndrome patients with aortic events. Genetics in Medicine. 2015;17(3):177–187. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gillis E., Kempers M., Salemink S., et al. An FBN1 Deep Intronic Mutation in a Familial Case of Marfan Syndrome: An Explanation for Genetically Unsolved Cases? Human Mutation. 2014;35(5):571–574. doi: 10.1002/humu.22540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Guo D.-C., Gupta P., Tran-Fadulu V., et al. An FBN1 pseudoexon mutation in a patient with Marfan syndrome: Confirmation of cryptic mutations leading to disease. Journal of Human Genetics. 2008;53(11-12):1007–1011. doi: 10.1007/s10038-008-0334-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hutchinson S., Wordsworth P. B., Handford P. A. Marfan syndrome caused by a mutation in FBN1 that gives rise to cryptic splicing and a 33 nucleotide insertion in the coding sequence. Human Genetics. 2001;109(4):416–420. doi: 10.1007/s004390100573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tjeldhorn L., Amundsen S. S., Barøy T., et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of FBN1 mRNA from 16 patients with Marfan Syndrome. BMC Medical Genetics. 2015;16(1, article no. 113) doi: 10.1186/s12881-015-0260-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Torrado M., Centeno A., López E., Mikhailov A. T. In vivo forced expression of myocardin in ventricular myocardium transiently impairs systolic performance in early neonatal pig heart. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2009;53(8–10):1457–1467. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072366mt. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torrado M., Iglesias R., Centeno A., López E., Mikhailov A. T. Targeted gene-silencing reveals the functional significance of myocardin signaling in the failing heart. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026392.e26392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Richards S., Aziz N., Bale S. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genetics in Medicine. 2015;17(5):405–423. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tan L., Li Z., Zhou C., et al. FBN1 mutations largely contribute to sporadic non-syndromic aortic dissection. Human Molecular Genetics. 2017;26(24):4814–4822. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karttunen L., Ukkonen T., Kainulainen K., Syvänen A.-C., Peltonen L. Two novel fibrillin-l mutations resulting in premature termination codons but in different mutant transcript levels and clinical phenotypes. Human Mutation. 1998;11(1):S34–S37. doi: 10.1002/humu.1380110112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Isken O., Maquat L. E. Quality control of eukaryotic mRNA: Safeguarding cells from abnormal mRNA function. Genes & Development. 2007;21(15):1833–1856. doi: 10.1101/gad.1566807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are presented in the manuscript.