To the Editor
Antibiotic resistance (AR) is a growing crisis fueled by globalization and widespread antibiotic use.1 The development of new antibiotics has not matched the emergence of MDROs,2 making it further necessary to explore other avenues to combat this issue. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is one such option that needs further exploration in the acute-care setting in cases with therapeutic limitations associated with AR such as the following.
A 57-year-old man who suffered a traumatic brain injury in China was transferred to Emory University Hospital after spending several months in an intensive care unit (ICU). In China, he underwent decompressive craniectomy and clot evacuation followed by tracheostomy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)–tube placement, and chronic indwelling urinary catheter placement. The hospitalization was complicated by pneumonia with a sputum culture that grew Klebsiella pneumoniae documented to only be sensitive to tigecycline. He was treated with meropenem, which was continued upon transfer to our hospital to treat hospital-acquired pneumonia as well as a newly diagnosed catheter-associated urinary tract infection. In total, he received ~ 5 weeks of broad-spectrum antibiotics. He did well without antibiotics for a 3-week period before developing a fever and leukocytosis.
Repeat urine culture at Emory University Hospital grew carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae per the modified Hodge test resistant to all tested antibiotics. Infectious diseases personnel were consulted. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the Micro-Scan WalkAway-96 plus system and the Neg Breakpoint Combo Panel 44 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL). Given the AST profile, E-tests (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) were performed for ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazadime-avibactam, colistin, and fosfomycin. Therapy with fosfomycin (3 g via PEG tube) was initiated because the patient was stable and had no renal failure.
Given the recurrence of MDRO infection, FMT was offered as a means to reduce MDRO colonization to prevent future such infections,3,4 and initial permission from the FDA for an emergency investigational drug (eIND) was pursued. The following day, the patient further decompensated and required ventilator support. E-tests for his urine isolate showed an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to fosfomycin, resistance to ceftolozane-tazobactam, and susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam (Table 1). Confirmatory AST was performed using reference broth microdilution at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) identified the isolate to harbor blakPC (Table 1). As a result, fosfomycin was stopped and intravenous (IV) ceftazidime-avibactam (2.5 g every 12 hours) and IV colistin (5 mg/kg loading dose followed by 1.25 mg/kg every 6 hours) was started. Respiratory culture from bronchoalveolar lavage grew carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa; inhaled colistin (150 mg every 12 hours) was added. On day 2 of his ICU stay, upon FDA approval of eIND application, FMT was performed via PEG tube (18 French halyard gastrostomy tube).5 Due to ileus noted on imaging, stool was administered slowly; 20 cm3 of stool was administered at 09:25 AM over 5 minutes followed by an additional 10 cm3 in bolus form at 10:00 AM. During administration, vital signs and ventilator requirements remained stable with no signs of aspiration noted. Unfortunately, the patient continued to be febrile and hypoxic despite subsequent escalation in the ventilator settings. Given ongoing clinical deterioration, care was deescalated and FMT was stopped. The patient died at 17:42; no autopsy was requested.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial Drug(s) | Urine Isolate (Tested at Emory) | BAL Isolate (Tested at Emory) | Urine Isolate (Tested at CDC) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
Interp | MIC (μg/mL) | Interp | MIC (μg/mL) | Interp | MIC (μg/mL) | |
Amikacin | R | >32 | S | ≤16 | R | >64 |
Ampicillin | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >32 |
Ampicillin-sulbactam | R | >16/8 | R | >16/8 | R | >32/16 |
Aztreonam | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >64 |
Cefazolin | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >8 |
Cefepime | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >32 |
Cefoxitin | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >16 |
Ceftazidime | R | >16 | R | >16 | R | >128 |
Ceftazidime-avibactama | S | 4/4 | S | 4/4 | ||
Ceftolozane-tazobactam | R | 32/4 | R | >16/4 | ||
Ceftriaxone | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >32 |
Cefuroxime | R | >16 | R | >16 | ||
Chloramphenicol | I | 16 | ||||
Colistin | WT | 0.125 | 0.125 | WT | 0.5 | |
Doripenem | R | >8 | ||||
Fosfomycin | >1024 | |||||
Gentamicin | R | >8 | S | ≤4 | R | >16 |
Levofloxacin | R | >4 | R | >4 | R | >8 |
Meropenem | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | >8 |
Minocycline | R | >16 | ||||
Nitrofurantoin | R | >64 | ||||
Piperacillin-tazobactam | R | >64/4 | R | >64/4 | R | >128/4 |
Tetracycline | R | >8 | R | >32 | ||
Tigecyclinea | I | 4 | S | 2 | ||
Tobramycin | R | >8 | S | ≤4 | R | >16 |
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole | R | >2/38 | R | >2/38 | R | >8/152 |
Cefotaxime | R | >32 | R | >32 | R | >64 |
Ciprofloxacin | R | >2 | R | >2 | R | >8 |
Ertapenem | R | >4 | R | >4 | R | >8 |
Imipenem | R | >8 | R | >8 | R | 64 |
Piperacillin | R | >64 | R | >64 |
NOTE. BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Interp, interpretation; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; R, resistant; S, susceptible; I, intermediate; WT, wild-type; FDA, Food and Drug Administration; CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
FDA breakpoints used for ceftazidime-avibactam and tigecycline; all other drugs were interpreted according to CLSI criteria.
In this case, we illustrate the growing global problem of AR and propose that FMT may have a role for patients with MDRO infections. The patient likely initially became colonized with KPC while hospitalized in China; the intestine in particular is a major site of Klebsiella pneumoniae colonization/carriage in ICU patients.6 Broad-spectrum antibiotic usage exacerbates antibiotic resistance, and alteration in the intestinal microbiome is thought to be a key step in acquiring the composite of AR genes that have been labeled the resistome.7,8 After initial treatment with meropenem in China, he continued on this antibiotic for subsequent hospital-acquired infections. Given determinants of AR may persist in intestinal flora for extended periods of time,7 we suspect that this patient’s microbiome did not recover before further pressure from broad-spectrum antibiotic use, resulting in the persistence of resistant strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae.9 In hindsight, the best opportunity to restore intestinal flora and reduce antibiotic-resistant microbiome burden may have been the period after the course of meropenem was completed before subsequent decompensation.
Fecal microbiota transplantation has become a well-established modality to treat recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI).8,10 This therapy is thought to improve microbial diversity through direct transfer of screened fecal material from donor to recipient. While FMT has been proposed as a tool to reduce MDRO colonization in research settings, it has not yet been established as a treatment option for urgent intestinal microbiome restoration. However, FDA approval of an investigational new drug (IND) application is required for clinical or research use for applications other than RCDI.5 In this case, given the family’s willingness to attempt FMT and subsequent approval of the eIND from the FDA, FMT was performed. With the patient in septic shock, FMT was attempted as the slim benefit of an unknown mechanism outweighed the minimal risk associated with the procedure.
We anticipate that as difficult cases such as this become increasingly frequent, there may be a role for FMT in the acute-care setting, especially for intra-abdominal infections. Rather than requiring emergent approval for FMT, incorporating protocols detailing FMT into the inpatient standard of care for MDRO colonization may result in a more expedient implementation before it is potentially too late and the patient develops new and potentially more life-threatening infections.
Acknowledgments
Financial support: No financial support was provided relevant to this article.
Potential conflicts of interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
References
- 1.World Health Organization. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martens E, Demain AL. The antibiotic resistance crisis, with a focus on the United States. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 2017;70:520–526. doi: 10.1038/ja.2017.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bilinski J, Grzesiowski P, Sorensen N, et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with blood disorders inhibits gut colonization with antibiotic-resistant bacteria: results of a prospective, single-center study. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:364–370. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dubberke ER, Mullane KM, Gerding DN, et al. Clearance of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus concomitant with administration of a microbiota-based drug targeted at recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3:ofw133. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Woodworth MH, Neish EM, Miller NS, et al. Laboratory testing of donors and stool samples for fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:1002–1010. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02327-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gorrie CL, Mirceta M, Wick RR, et al. Gastrointestinal carriage is a major reservoir of K. pneumoniae infection in intensive care patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:208–215. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Forslund K, Sunagawa S, Kultima JR, et al. Country-specific antibiotic use practices impact the human gut resistome. Genome Res. 2013;23:1163–1169. doi: 10.1101/gr.155465.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Millan B, Laffin M, Madsen K. Fecal Microbiota transplantation: beyond Clostridium difficile. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2017;19:31. doi: 10.1007/s11908-017-0586-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lawley TD, Clare S, Walker AW, et al. Targeted restoration of the intestinal microbiota with a simple, defined bacteriotherapy resolves relapsing Clostridium difficile disease in mice. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1002995. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bakken JS, Borody T, Brandt LJ, et al. Treating Clostridium difficile infection with fecal microbiota transplantation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:1044–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2011.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]