Skip to main content
PMC home page
Ophthalmology and Therapy logoLink to Ophthalmology and Therapy
. 2018 Feb 13;7(1):109–118. doi: 10.1007/s40123-018-0121-2

Eplerenone Versus Observation in the Treatment of Acute Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Retrospective Controlled Study

Ilaria Zucchiatti 1, Riccardo Sacconi 1,2, Maria Cristina Parravano 3, Eliana Costanzo 3, Lea Querques 1, Daniela Montorio 1,4, Francesco Bandello 1, Giuseppe Querques 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC5997595  PMID: 29442283

Abstract

Introduction

To investigate the effects of eplerenone compared to observation in the treatment of acute central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Methods

Charts of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acute CSC (visual symptoms < 12 weeks) were reviewed. Included patients were divided into a treatment group (treated with eplerenone) and a control group (observation). Main outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), height of subretinal fluid (SRF) and subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT) at 1 and 3 months in the two groups.

Results

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (2 female, 13 male) and 12 eyes of 12 patients (1 female, 11 male [p = 1.000]) were included in the treatment and control groups, respectively. The mean age was 44 ± 9 (30–65) and 47 ± 11 years (28–66 years, p = 0.493), respectively. In the treatment group, BCVA improved significantly at 1 month (p = 0.018) and 3 months of follow-up (p = 0.011), while a non-significant improvement was seen in the control group. At 3 months, 12 of 15 eyes (80%) in the treatment group demonstrated complete SRF resolution, versus 3 of 12 eyes (25%) in the control group (p = 0.007). In the treatment group, SRF and CMT were significantly reduced at the 1-month follow-up (p = 0.014, p = 0.028, respectively) and the 3-month follow-up (p < 0.001 for both analyses), while in the control group the changes were not statistically significant. Eplerenone was well tolerated in all patients.

Conclusion

Patients affected by acute CSC treated with eplerenone achieved greater and faster resolution of the disease compared to the observation group. Eplerenone may represent an attractive new first-line treatment option for acute CSC.

Keywords: Central serous chorioretinopathy, Eplerenone, Optical coherence tomography, OCT angiography

Introduction

Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a common disorder that typically affects young adult men, with an incidence of approximately 5.8 per 100,000 people [1]. Acute disease is characterized by the presence of serous retinal detachment and/or retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) detachment located in the macular region, leading to central vision loss, dyschromatopsia, central or paracentral scotoma, metamorphopsia and/or micropsia. Acute CSC is typically a benign disorder that resolves spontaneously in 2–3 months [2]. Nevertheless, approximately 30–50% of patients experience a recurrence of the disease over the long term [3, 4]. In addition, 5–10% of cases of unresolved disease may progress to chronic CSC (also known as diffuse retinal epitheliopathy), which includes persistent serous retinal detachment, associated with diffuse RPE alterations and, in some cases, cystoid retinal degeneration or pigment epithelium detachment [3]. In chronic CSC, the persistent fluid accumulation leads to progressive and irreversible damage to the photoreceptors that may have a decisive effect on visual prognosis [3, 5].

The pathogenesis of CSC is extremely complex and still poor understood. Risk factors for acute CSC include a stress-prone personality (type A behavior), an increased sympathetic activity, the use of systemic corticosteroid and hypertension [6–8].

Recent investigations strongly support the hypothesis that CSC is primarily characterized by vascular deregulation in the choroid. In fact, choroidal hyperpermeability changes have been clearly shown using fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) [9, 10], and increased choroidal thickness has been demonstrated in both the affected and contralateral eyes when measured with optical coherence tomography (OCT) [11–13]. New insights into the pathogenesis of this multifactorial disease have revealed that glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid dysfunction is also present [14–16]. In animal models, the activation of choroidal mineralocorticoid receptors was shown to cause choroidal vasodilation and leakage; this phenomenon was inhibited by mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonism [17]. Based on these findings, researchers investigated the role of mineralocorticoid antagonists in the treatment of CSC, reporting positive preliminary results [17–28]. Spironolactone and eplerenone are both oral-specific MR antagonists approved for several systemic disorders, and are commonly used for treating hypertension and congestive heart failure. However, spironolactone, although effective, is associated with various unwanted progestational and antiandrogenic side effects, such as gynecomastia, impotence and abnormal menstrual cycles, which can limit its use. Eplerenone has a lower affinity for steroid receptors (e.g. progesterone and androgen), leading to higher tolerability and specificity.

Recent reports have highlighted the potential benefits of eplerenone in patients with CSC, showing promising results in terms of gains in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reductions in central macular thickness (CMT) on OCT. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no data available concerning the treatment of acute CSC with eplerenone compared to observation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of eplerenone in the treatment of acute CSC compared to observation.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the charts of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acute CSC referred to the Medical Retina and Imaging Division of San Raffaele Hospital (Milan, Italy) and to the Fondazione G. B. Bietti-IRCCS (Rome, Italy) between January 2016 and July 2017, treated with eplerenone or with observation. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were at least 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of acute CSC, defined by the presence of subretinal fluid and visual symptoms for less than 12 weeks, and were experiencing an episode of CSC for the first time. Exclusion criteria were the presence of chronic CSC (duration of visual symptoms more than 12 weeks) or recurrent CSC (patients with a history of one or more previous CSC attacks), presence of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) identified by FA, ICGA and/or OCT angiography (OCT-A), any treatment for retinal disease (including intravitreal injections, photodynamic therapy, laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy), history of other retinal disorders (including age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, diabetic retinopathy, uveitis or pathologic myopia) and the presence of any other systemic condition for which eplerenone was contraindicated (such as severe renal, cardiac or hepatic failure, pregnancy, baseline serum potassium greater than 5.0 mEq/L, concomitant administration of potassium-sparing diuretics, potassium supplements, strong CYP3A4 inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers).

All patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned to either the treatment group (treated with eplerenone) or the observation group. All patients treated with eplerenone were consecutively included at San Raffaele Hospital, while all observed subjects were consecutively included at the Fondazione G. B. Bietti-IRCCS. The follow-up period was 3 months.

The patients in the treatment group were treated with eplerenone 25 mg/day for 1 week and then 50 mg/day for 11 weeks. Serum potassium and creatinine assessment were performed at baseline before starting treatment and monthly during treatment. Eplerenone was discontinued in the case of increased serum potassium or creatinine or in cases of drug intolerance.

At baseline, each patient underwent assessment of BCVA on standard ETDRS charts, converted into logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis, along with comprehensive ophthalmological examination and multimodal imaging by fundus autofluorescence, FA, ICGA and spectral domain-OCT (SD-OCT; Spectralis HRA+OCT [Heidelberg Retina Angiograph + OCT]; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) and swept-source OCT-A (PLEX Elite 9000; Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA, USA). Patients included in the study were followed up at 1 and 3 months with BCVA, IOP, biomicroscopy, SD-OCT and OCT-A examinations.

SD-OCT evaluation included CMT analysis using macular thickness maps. Manual measurement of subfoveal retinal fluid (SRF) height was performed for each control, measuring the distance between the end of the outer segment and the retinal pigment epithelium at the foveal center. The subfoveal choroidal thickness (CT), defined as the vertical distance between the hyper-reflective line of Bruch’s membrane and the chorio-scleral interface, was measured manually using an enhanced-depth imaging (EDI) technique.

The main outcome measures included comparisons of BCVA, CMT, SRF and subfoveal CT between the treatment and control groups and at all time points. Safety analysis and treatment tolerance were recorded at each visit.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics version 20 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results of descriptive analyses were expressed as means ± standard deviations for quantitative variables, and as counts and percentages for categorical variables. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. The Gaussian distribution of continuous variables was verified with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparisons of age, CSC duration, BCVA, CMT, SRF and subfoveal CT between treatment and control groups were performed using the Student independent samples t test. Comparisons of BCVA, SRF, CMT and subfoveal CT between the three time points were performed using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction for post hoc analysis. In all analyses, p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 27 eyes of 27 white patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Fifteen eyes of 15 patients (2 female, 13 male) were included in the treatment group, while 12 eyes of 12 patients (1 female, 11 male [p = 1.000]) were included in the control group. The subjects of the two groups were similar in age, with a mean age of 44 ± 9 years (range 30–65 years) and 47 ± 11 years (range 28–66 years, p = 0.493) for the treatment and control groups, respectively. No patients in either group were affected by any condition that might play a role in the development of CSC, including medication use (such as steroids), pregnancy or other systemic diseases (e.g. endogenous hypercortisolism) related to the disease pathogenesis. In particular, no included patients were receiving any type of chronic therapy.

At baseline, patients had been affected by CSC for a mean of 6.6 ± 2.9 weeks (median 6; range 1–11 weeks) and presented a leakage point at ICGA. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, no signs of CNV were revealed on OCT-A or dye angiography. On structural SD-OCT, all patients presented SRF (mean SRF, 180 ± 102 μm; range, 21–363 μm), and BCVA was 0.14 ± 0.10 logMAR (range 0.0–0.4). As reported in Table 1, no differences in CSC duration, BCVA, CMT, SRF or subfoveal CT were noted at baseline between the two groups.

Table 1.

Demographics and main clinical features of the study population

Treatment group Control group P value
Eyes (patients), no. 15 (15) 12 (12)
Sex, no.
 Male 13 11
 Female 2 1 1.000a
Age, years (mean ± SD) 44 ± 9 47 ± 11 0.493b
Duration of symptoms, weeks (mean ± SD) 6.9 ± 3.1 6.3 ± 2.8 0.645b
BCVA, logMAR (mean ± SD) 0.15 ± 0.12 0.12 ± 0.06 0.337b
CMT, µm (mean ± SD) 426 ± 104 409 ± 113 0.693b
SRF, µm (mean ± SD) 188 ± 107 171 ± 100 0.679b
Subfoveal CT, µm (mean ± SD) 436 ± 78 378 ± 76 0.064b
Open in a new tab

SD standard deviation, BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, CMT central macular thickness, SRF subretinal fluid, CT choroidal thickness

aFisher’s exact test, bStudent’s t test

In the treatment group, BCVA improved significantly during the follow-up, from 0.15 ± 0.12 logMAR at baseline to 0.10 ± 0.11 logMAR after 1 month (p = 0.018), and to 0.06 ± 0.06 logMAR after 3 months (p = 0.011). BCVA also improved in the control group, although this was not statistically significant (from 0.12 ± 0.06 logMAR at baseline to 0.09 ± 0.05 logMAR after 1 month [p = 0.246], and to 0.08 ± 0.07 logMAR after 3 months [p = 0.498]). However, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in BCVA at baseline or at the 1- or 3-month follow-up (p = 0.337, p = 0.816 and p = 0.378, respectively).

At the first follow-up visit after 1 month, 7 of 15 eyes (47%) in the treatment group demonstrated complete SRF resolution on structural SD-OCT, while only 1 of 12 eyes (8%) in the control group achieved the same result (p = 0.043; Figs. 1, 2). A significant difference was also evident at the second follow-up visit, after 3 months: 12 of 15 eyes (80%) in the treatment group demonstrated complete SRF resolution (Fig. 1), versus 3 of 12 eyes (25%) in the control group (p = 0.007). In the treatment group, SRF decreased significantly during the follow-up (SRF: 188 ± 107 µm, 78 ± 85 µm [p = 0.014] and 17 ± 50 µm [p < 0.001] at baseline and 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively), and CMT also decreased significantly, from 426 ± 104 µm at baseline to 330 ± 81 µm at 1-month follow-up (p = 0.028) and to 274 ± 60 µm at 3-month follow-up (p < 0.001; Table 2). In the control group, SRF decreased slightly during follow-up, with no statistically significant difference, and CMT did not change significantly (Table 2). No significant difference was observed between the two groups in SRF or CMT at baseline or after 1 month (p = 0.679 and p = 0.083 for SRF at baseline and 1-month follow-up, respectively, and p = 0.693 and p = 0.079 for CMT at baseline and 1-month follow-up, respectively). However, a significant difference in SRF and CMT was observed between groups at 3 months (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Multimodal imaging evaluation of a patient affected by acute CSC included in the treatment group. At baseline, fluorescein angiography (a) and indocyanine green angiography (b) revealed a leakage point; 3 × 3 en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography of choriocapillaris slab (c) showed no signs of choroidal neovascularization; and structural OCT (d) revealed the presence of subretinal fluid and increased choroidal thickness. At 1 month (e) and 3 months (f) after eplerenone treatment, the complete absence of subretinal fluid was clearly visible on structural OCT

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Baseline multimodal imaging of a patient affected by acute CSC included in the control group. At baseline, fluorescein angiography (a) and indocyanine green angiography (b) revealed a leakage point; 3 × 3 en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography of choriocapillaris slab (c) showed no signs of choroidal neovascularization; and structural OCT (d) revealed the presence of subretinal fluid and increased choroidal thickness. At 1 month (e) and 3 months (f) after observation, no significant differences in subfoveal fluid were observed at structural OCT

Table 2.

Main changes in clinical parameters from baseline at each follow-up in all data

Baseline 1-month examination p value 3-month examination p value
BCVA, logMAR (mean ± SD)
 Treatment group 0.15 ± 0.12 0.10 ± 0.11 0.018a 0.06 ± 0.06 0.011a
 Control group 0.12 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.05 0.246a 0.08 ± 0.07 0.498a
SRF, μm (mean ± SD)
 Treatment group 188 ± 107 78 ± 85 0.014a 17 ± 50 < 0.001a
 Control group 171 ± 101 147 ± 115 0.431a 134 ± 118 0.453a
CMT, μm (mean ± SD)
 Treatment group 426 ± 104 330 ± 81 0.028a 274 ± 60 p < 0.001a
 Control group 409 ± 113 396 ± 107 1.000a 409 ± 103 1.000a
Subfoveal CT, μm (mean ± SD)
 Treatment group 436 ± 78 429 ± 88 1.000a 418 ± 86 0.019a
 Control group 378 ± 76 381 ± 63 1.000a 384 ± 83 1.000a
Open in a new tab

BCVA best-corrected visual acuity, SD standard deviation, SRF subretinal fluid, CMT central macular thickness, CT choroidal thickness

aAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction for post hoc analysis

Subfoveal CT decreased significantly during the follow-up in the treatment group (from 436 ± 78 µm at baseline to 418 ± 86 µm at 3-month follow-up [p = 0.019]), while no significant decrease was found in the control group (p = 1.000). Furthermore, no differences were found in subfoveal CT between 15 patients who achieved complete resolution of SRF and 12 patients who did not (p = 0.873, p = 0.607 and p = 0.970 at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-up, respectively).

No serious ocular or systemic side effects related to eplerenone treatment were recorded during the follow-up.

Discussion

Treatment of CSC remains challenging. Acute CSC is generally a self-limiting disease, with almost 25% of patients experiencing complete resolution of symptoms in 3 months or less without any treatment [29]. According to the natural benign course of the disease, observation may be considered as a first line of therapy. Nevertheless, patients who do not achieve spontaneous recovery can progress to chronic disease, with persistent subretinal fluid, progressive RPE damage and irreversible visual deterioration. In addition, since patients generally express a strong desire for faster resolution of symptoms, treatment is also necessary in cases of acute self-limiting disease.

Focal laser photocoagulation targeted to the leakage point has been used in the past to reduce a unique and extrafoveal RPE leak [30]. Full or half-fluence photodynamic therapy (PDT) still plays a key role in the treatment of CSC in order to reduce choroidal hyperpermeability. Several studies have confirmed the efficacy of PDT, showing a reduction in serous retinal detachment and a decrease in choroidal thickness, but the safety effects are still debated over the long term [27–32]. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents have been given to reduce vascular permeability, although the exact role of VEGF in the pathogenesis of CSC is still unclear [33]. Therefore, a specific treatment targeted to the mechanism of choroidal dysfunction is still lacking.

Previous studies have shown that over-activation of the MR pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of CSC, related to an excess of corticosteroids or MR hypersensitivity, based on genetic or environmental predisposition [17].

The results of this study revealed that oral eplerenone, acting on the MR pathway, was more effective than observation in the treatment of acute CSC. In fact, in the treatment group, BCVA improved significantly at all time points, while visual improvement was not statistically significant in the control group. The results concerning changes in SRF and CMT followed the same trend, with a significant decrease at all follow-up visits in the treatment group, while no statistically significant changes were shown in the control group. With regard to SRF resolution, at 1 month, 47% of the patients in the treatment group demonstrated complete reabsorption, compared to only 8% of those in the control group. A significant difference was also evident at 3 months: 80% of subjects in the treatment group demonstrated complete SRF resolution, versus only 25% in the control group.

In addition, subfoveal CT decreased significantly during follow-up in the treatment group, while no significant changes were found in the control group. These results strongly support the theory that eplerenone has a meaningful effect against the inappropriate activation of the mineralocorticoid receptors found in the choroidal vasculature of patients with CSC.

The percentage of patients achieving resolution of the disease varies in the literature, according to the main outcome measures considered and the different populations [18, 21, 23, 24, 28]. In the study by Ghadiali et al. [19], the efficacy of both eplerenone and spironolactone was assessed in eyes with predominantly chronic disease. Even though a significant visual improvement was achieved in all patients, CMT and subfoveal CT showed no significant change. More than 90% of eyes exhibited chronic CSC, and about half of the patients enrolled had exudative CSC without subretinal fluid, suggesting that both MR antagonists might be less effective in the chronic form of the disease.

However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has analyzed the effects of eplerenone in acute CSC. Sun et al. [29] investigated the effects of spironolactone versus observation in patients with acute CSC. Similar to our study, they found that complete resolution of SRF was achieved at 2 months in 56% of treated patients, compared to 8% of patients in the control group. The mean CMT and SRF decreased significantly at each visit in both groups, and BCVA improved in both groups at 2 months. In accord with our results, they observed that the subfoveal CT decreased significantly in the treatment group at 2 months, while the change from baseline was not significant in the control group. In addition, the authors reported that none of the patients in the treatment group developed any side effects related to the use of spironolactone, likely because of the short period of treatment. Although eplerenone has a lower affinity for the MR and a theoretically less effective action than spironolactone, our results are in line with those of Sun et al.

We acknowledge that our study has several limitations, primarily related to the small sample and short follow-up duration. Further randomized placebo-controlled clinical studies are needed to increase our knowledge in the treatment of such complex disease.

Conclusions

This study showed that patients affected by acute CSC treated with eplerenone achieved higher and faster resolution of the disease than those with observation. Although this study has some limitations, our results show that eplerenone is an effective non-invasive treatment option for acute CSC, with a good safety profile, confirmed by regular laboratory checks. In conclusion, eplerenone may represent an attractive new first-line treatment option for acute CSC.

Acknowledgements

Funding

No funding or sponsorship was received for this study or publication of this article.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval for the version to be published.

Disclosures

Ilaria Zucchiatti, Riccardo Sacconi, Eliana Costanzo, Lea Querques and Daniela Montorio have nothing to disclose. Maria Cristina Parravano is a consultant for Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA, USA), Bayer Schering Pharma (Berlin, Germany) and Novartis (Basel, Switzerland). Francesco Bandello is a consultant for Alcon (Fort Worth, TX, USA), Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, GA, USA), Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA, USA), Farmila-Thea (Clermont-Ferrand, France), Bayer Schering Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Bausch + Lomb (Rochester, NY, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, CA, USA), Hoffmann-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland), Novagali Pharma (Évry, France), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), ThromboGenics (Leuven, Belgium) and Zeiss (Dublin, CA, USA). Giuseppe Querques is a consultant for Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, GA USA), Allergan, Inc. (Irvine, CA, USA), Bayer Schering Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Heidelberg (Germany), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sandoz (Berlin, Germany) and Zeiss (Dublin, CA, USA).

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Footnotes

Enhanced content

To view enhanced content for this article go to 10.6084/m9.figshare.5844888.

References

  • 1.Kitzmann AS, Pulido JS, Diehl NN, et al. The incidence of central serous chorioretinopathy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980–2002. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:169–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.02.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Liew G, Quin G, Gillies M, et al. Central serous chorioretinopathy: a review of epidemiology and pathophysiology. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;41:201–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2012.02848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang M, Munch IC, Hasler PW, Prunte C, Larsen M. Central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:126–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00889.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loo RH, Scott IU, Flynn HW, et al. Factors associated with reduced visual acuity during long-term follow-up of patients with idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2002;22:19–24. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200202000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang MS, Sander B, Larsen M. Retinal atrophy in idiopathic central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:787–793. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01438-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yannuzzi LA. Type-A behavior and central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 1987;7:111–131. doi: 10.1097/00006982-198700720-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tewari HK, Gadia R, Kumar D, Venkatesh P, Garg SP. Sympathetic-parasympathetic activity and reactivity in central serous chorioretinopathy: a case–control study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3474–3478. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tittl MK, Spaide RF, Wong D, et al. Systemic findings associated with central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:63–68. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00075-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spaide RF, Hall L, Haas A, et al. Indocyanine green videoangiography of older patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 1996;16:203–213. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199616030-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Iida T, Kishi S, Hagimura N, Shimizu K. Persistent and bilateral choroidal vascular abnormalities in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 1999;19:508–512. doi: 10.1097/00006982-199911000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:1469–1473. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181be0a83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jirarattanasopa P, Ooto S, Tsujikawa A, et al. Assessment of macular choroidal thickness by optical coherence tomography and angiographic changes in central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:1666–1678. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Maruko I, Iida T, Sugano Y, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in fellow eyes of patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2011;31:1603–1608. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31820f4b39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Carvalho-Recchia CA, Yannuzzi LA, Negrao S, et al. Corticosteroids and central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1834–1837. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01117-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haimovici R, Rumelt S, Melby J. Endocrine abnormalities in patients with central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:698–703. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01975-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Haimovici R, Koh S, Gagnon DR, et al. Risk factors for central serous chorioretinopathy: a case–control study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:244–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao M, Célérier I, Bousquet E, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor is involved in rat and human ocular chorioretinopathy. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:2672–2679. doi: 10.1172/JCI61427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bousquet E, Beydoun T, Zhao M, Hassan L, Offret O, Behar-Cohen F. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in the treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a pilot study. Retina. 2013;33:2096–2102. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318297a07a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ghadiali Q, Jung JJ, Yu S, Patel SN, Yannuzzi LA. Central serous chorioretinopathy treated with mineralocorticoid antagonists: a one-year pilot study. Retina. 2016;36:611–618. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Breukink MB, den Hollander AI, Keunen JE, Boon CJ, Hoyng CB. The use of eplerenone in therapy-resistant chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e488–e490. doi: 10.1111/aos.12392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leisser C, Hirnschall N, Hackl C, Findl O. Eplerenone in patients with chronic recurring central serous chorioretinopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2015 doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Daruich A, Matet A, Dirani A, et al. Oral mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists: real-life experience in clinical subtypes of nonresolving central serous chorioretinopathy with chronic epitheliopathy. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5:2. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh RP, Sears JE, Bedi R, Schachat AP, Ehlers JP, Kaiser PK. Oral eplerenone for the management of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:310–314. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chin EK, Almeida DR, Roybal CN, et al. Oral mineralocorticoid antagonists for recalcitrant central serous chorioretinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1449–1456. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S86778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salz DA, Pitcher JD, 3rd, Hsu J, et al. Oral eplerenone for treatment of chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a case series. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46:439–444. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20150422-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kapoor KG, Wagner AL. Mineralocorticoid antagonists in the treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy: a comparative analysis. Ophthalmic Res. 2016;56:17–22. doi: 10.1159/000444058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rabiolo A, Zucchiatti I, Marchese A, et al. Multimodal retinal imaging in central serous chorioretinopathy treated with oral eplerenone or photodynamic therapy. Eye. 2017 doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun X, Shuai Y, Fang W, et al. Spironolactone versus observation in the treatment of acute central serous chorioretinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Daruich A, Matet A, Marchionno L, et al. Acute central serous chorioretinopathy: factors influencing episode duration. Retina. 2017;37:1905–1915. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Robertson DM, Ilstrup D. Direct, indirect, and sham laser photocoagulation in the management of central serous chorioretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;95:457–466. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(83)90265-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maruko I, Iida T, Sugano Y, et al. Subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1792–1799. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chan W-M, Lai TYY, Lai RYK, et al. Half-dose verteporfin photodynamic therapy for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: one-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1756–1765. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu HQ, Wang EQ, Zhang T, et al. Photodynamic therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for acute central serous chorioretinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. 2016;30:15–22. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Ophthalmology and Therapy are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES