Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 May 12;19:988–991. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.045

Distribution of breast cancer risk factors in two groups of healthy people referral to cancer registry and Shahid Mottahari center

Rahmatollah Moradzadeh a, Parvaneh Golmohammadi b, Mohammad Hassan Kazemi-Galougahi c, Majid Sartipi d, Hooshmand Sharfi e, Mohammad Ahmadpour f,
PMCID: PMC5997904  PMID: 29900394

Abstract

The aim of this study is evaluation of breast cancer risk factors distribution in two groups of healthy people referral to cancer registry and Shahid Mottahari center in Iran. This study is cross-sectional study which is part of the study to estimate Gene-Environment Interaction in women with breast cancer with case-control studies in Shiraz. In this study, two control groups have been used. The sample size of 300 was specified for each group. Selection sources of groups include Cancer Registry Center and referred people to surgical and internal ward of Shahid Mottahari Clinic. Information collect tools have included Form No. 1 in Cancer Registry Center which includes information of age, use of oral contraceptives history, breastfeeding history, number of live births, age at menarche, age at first childbirth, etc. Considering the results obtained, it was showed that the highest frequency (144) in the group of Cancer Registry Center belongs to high school education, but the highest frequency of Shahid Mottahari Clinic is related to primary education (176).There is statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of education, history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives and age at first birth, (P<0.05). Due to the easy availability of data on non-cancer patients referred to the cancer registry center, researchers may be encouraged to use them as a control group, but we must bear in mind that, this Group may be different in terms of some variables, and this difference leads to bias in the estimation of considered exposure effects.

Keywords: Breast cancer, Cancer registry, Risk factor, Iran


Specifications Table

Subject area Medicine
More specific subject area Public health
Type of data Tables
How data was acquired In this cross-sectional study, the women with breast cancer in shiraz as case group and two control groups have been used (Each group consisted of 300 people). Selection sources of groups include cancer registry center and referred people to surgical and internal ward of Shahid Mottahari Clinic. Information collect tools have included Form No. 1 in cancer registry center which includes information of age, use of oral contraceptives history, breastfeeding history, number of live births, age at menarche, age at first childbirth, etc.
Data format Raw, analyzed
Experimental factors In this study, two control groups have been used.
Experimental features Statistical analysis has been performed using STATA 8.0 statistical software.
Data source location Shiraz city, Iran
Data accessibility Data are included in this article

Value of the data

  • Breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of cancer death in women in the world [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Therefore, further study is needed in this regard. The data from this study are in line with this overall goal.

  • In some parts of Iran, the incidence of breast cancer is higher than in other places [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Therefore, collecting data about these cases and analyzing the risk factors of this type of cancer is very useful in preventing it. The data from this study are in line with this overall goal.

  • In this study, two control groups have been used. Therefore, it can be said that the data obtained from this study is valuable.

  • The data of this study show that there is statistically significant difference between the two groups (case and control) in terms of education, history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives and age at first birth.

1. Data

Considering the results obtained, it was showed that the highest frequency (144) in the group of Cancer Registry Center belongs to high school education, and the lowest frequency associated with illiterate group. But the highest frequency of Shahid Mottahari Clinic is related to primary education (176) and the lowest one is related to cases with academic education [11]. The results also showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups according to level of education (P=0.001). But in terms of history of live births and breastfeeding, there is no significant statistical difference between the two groups. But in terms of family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives they had a significant difference that, the highest frequency of this variable (49) was in the group of breast registry center s and 17 cases were in the control group of Shahid Mottahari clinics. There was a statistically significant difference (p=0.001) between the two groups in terms of age at first birth that, the highest frequency (256) was associated with Shahid Mottahari clinic group with age at first birth 25–34 years. No significant difference was observed in terms of duration of contraceptive pills (ocp). And the statistical test can not be performed with the variable age at first menstrual, because the changes within both groups is constant. The above results are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Distribution of frequency of study covariates among study population.

Components Shahid Mottahari clinic Cancer registry P
Education
Illiterate 30 64 0.001
Elementary education 120 176
High school education 144 74
College education 32 18



History of breast feeding
No 17 15 0.4
Yes 310 318



History of parity
No 0 1 0.49
Yes 291 286



Family history of breast cancer
No 49 17 0.001
Yes 278 316



Age at first pregnancy
Lower than 25 33 44 0.001
25–34 225 256
35 and over or No pregnancy 60 25



Oral contraceptive duration
Minimum 0 0 0.78
Maximum 268 648



Age at menarche
Lower than 12 0 0
Over 12 268 291

2. Study design, materials and methods

The research is part of the study to estimate Gene-Environment Interaction in women with breast cancer with case-control studies, and the only one in Shiraz. In this study, two control groups were used: 1. Women without breast cancer selected among women referred to Cancer Registry Center for reasons other than breast cancer (such as obtaining the necessary training in the field of prevention). Mammography diagnostic test had been done to these people. The center׳s clients include families of patients, people referred from private clinics or health centers in which educational and screening services are provided to referring patients. Most of these people have been settled in Shiraz and questionnaire was completed for them. In this study, available information were used as a control group for patients with breast cancer that is readily available. 2. Women referred to medical and surgical wards of Shahid Mottahari clinic were interviewed after consent to participate in the study. The questionnaire was completed for this group, like the first group, the control group of Cancer Registry Center was selected among cases referred to the Cancer Registry Center (Breast Clinic). Measured independent variables include the use of oral contraceptives, breastfeeding history, number of pregnancies, age at menarche, age at first childbirth.Sample size is determined using Quanto1.2 application (January 2007) [12]. That was obtained using substitution on the software with α=0.05 and power of 80% and calculated sample size of 293. In this study, 300 controls of surgical and internal wards of ShahidMottahari clinic and 300 controls from the cancer registry were used. Sampling was such that 300 cases were selected from the list of breast cancer patients in the cancer registry with a simple random sampling and their ages were specified. And among patients referred to the center that their breast cancer has not been confirmed, 300 subjects were selected by sampling with the age ±3 years for each case as an age-matched control. In addition, 300 persons of internal and surgical wards of ShahidMottahari clinic were selected with available (easy) sampling method by interview after the consent to participate in the study as a second control group matched for age ± 3 years.

Samples included people living in Shiraz city more than five years.

Information collection tool included Form No. 1 in Cancer Registry Center which includes information of age, use of oral contraceptives history, breastfeeding history, number of live births, age at menarche, age at first childbirth, etc. Statistical analysis has been performed using STATA 8.0 statistical software.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge all non-financial supports provided by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency document associated with this article can be found in the online version at 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.045.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (12.6KB, docx)

.

References

  • 1.Damiani G., Basso D., Acampora A., Bianchi C.B., Silvestrini G., Frisicale E.M., Sassi F., Ricciardi W. The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 2015;81:281–289. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Safari Y., Afzali B., Ghasemi S., Sharafi K., Safar M. Comparing the effect of short message service (sms) and pamphlet instruction methods on women׳s knowledge, attitude and practice about breast cancer (2014) Act. Med. Mediterr. 2016;32:1927–1931. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Global Burden of Disease Cancer(GBD) The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:505–527. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weiderpass E., Meo M., Vainio H. Risk factors for breast cancer, including occupational exposures. Saf. Health Work. 2011;2:1–8. doi: 10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Center For Disease Control and Prevention, Noncommunicable Diseases Unit, Cancer Office. Iranian Annual of National Cancer Registration Report: Javan, 2009–2010.
  • 6.Jafari-Koshki T., Schmid V.J., Mahaki B. Trends of breast cancer incidence in Iran during 2004–2008: a Bayesian space-time model. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15:1557–1561. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.4.1557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mahouri K., Dehghani-Zahedani M., Zare S. Breast cancer risk factors in south of Islamic Republic of Iran: a case-control study. East Mediterr. Health J. 2017;13:1265–1273. doi: 10.26719/2007.13.6.1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Holakouie-Naieni K., Ardalan A., Mahmoodi M., Motevalian A., Yahyapoor Y., Yazdizadeh B. Risk factors of breast cancer in north of Iran: a case-control in Mazandaran Province. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2007;8:395–398. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hosseinzadeh M., Eivazi Ziaei J., Mahdavi N., Aghajari P., Vahidi M., Fateh A., Asghari E. Risk factors for breast cancer in Iranian women: a hospital-based case-control study in Tabriz, Iran. J. Breast Cancer. 2014;17:236–243. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.3.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zare N., Haem E., Lankarani K.B., Heydari S.T., Barooti E. Breast cancer risk factors in a defined population: weighted logistic regression approach for rare events. J. Breast Cancer. 2013;16:214–219. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.2.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Plu-Bureau G., Bossard N., Thalabard J. Oral contraception and genetic factors in breast cancer: characteristics and limits of case-only studies. Rev. Epidemiol. Sante Publique. 2000;48:294–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moradzadeh R., Mansournia M.A., Baghfalaki T., Ghiasvand R., Noori-Daloii M.R., Holakouie-Naieni K. Misclassification adjustment of family history of breast cancer in a case-control study: a Bayesian approach. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015;16:8221–8226. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (12.6KB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES