Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2018 May 5;18:1895–1899. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.097

Data on various allergen specific IgEs and prospective treatments on food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis

Norihide Murayama 1,, Kikuno Murayama 1
PMCID: PMC5998299  PMID: 29904693

Abstract

Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIAn) is an anaphylactic reaction induced by physical exercise after ingestion of certain meals. FDEIAn is not very frequent, but recent case reports associated with various meals indicate an upward trend. Here, we report the data of various food specific IgEs and the clinical course of an experience with a patient who exhibited a unique FDEIAn reaction. Various food specific IgEs including staple food were positive with high levels. We could not find out the cause food of FDEIAn. Therefore we started preventive drug treatment. Specifically, only the skin symptoms (urticaria) were prevented by administering anti-histamine (hydroxyzine) daily, and respiratory symptoms (wheezing and distress) were prevented by daily administration of a leukotriene receptor antagonist (montelukast).

Keywords: Multiple antigen positive, Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIAn), Exercise-induced asthma (EIA), Leukotriene, Montelukast, Hydroxyzine


Specifications Table

Subject area Clinical Immunology
More specific subject area Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIAn)
Type of data Table and Figure
How data was acquired Clinical examination
Data format Analyzed
Experimental factors Efficacy of hydroxyzine and montelukast
Experimental feature Treatment and mechanism of FDEIAn
Data source location Osaka, Japan
Data accessibility The data are supplied with this article

Value of the data

  • We experienced a patient of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

  • Most of His food specific IgEs including staple food were positive with high levels.

  • This is the second report of combined anti-histamine and leukotriene receptor antagonist preventive treatment for food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis.

1. Data

A case report of FDEIAn.

Patient: An 11-year-old male patient.

Body weight: 26.6 kg.

Height: 135.5 cm.

Patient history: No allergic disease history.

Family history: No food allergy and asthmatic history.

Present history; On June 7, 2005 patient exhibited exercise-induced total body urticaria and dyspnea 1 h after lunch at school and the symptoms disappeared after several hours. The following day, he and his mother visited our pediatric clinic for determination of the cause of symptoms.

2. Experimental design, materials, and methods

2.1. Condition following office visit

One hour before the initial development of symptoms the patient ate a Japanese Medlar, which we considered was the source of his FDEIAn. We prescribed a tablet of terbutaline and 15 mg hydroxyzine powder to be administered as needed. Subsequently, the symptoms occurred without the patient consuming Japanese Medlar. In each case, the symptoms occurred within 90 min after meal ingestion following exercise. Furthermore, the frequency of FDEIAn development increased as became > 2–3 times every month (Fig. 1). Moreover, cereal radioallergosorbent test (RAST)s were > class 3, and Rice Cap RAST showed the highest level among the Cereal Cap RASTs. We considered that the cause of his FDEIAn was rice, which could not be excluded from his daily diet.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clinical process.

2.2. CAP-radioallergosorbent test (RAST, Table 1.)

Table 1.

Allergen test result.

Total IgE (RIST) 1649 IU/mL
Peripheral blood WBC 5900/mcL, Eo 6.3%
RAST Inhaled Antigen ① Df (mite) 33.40 UA/mL
RAST Cereal ② Rice 12.90 UA/mL, ⑥ Wheat 8.42 UA/mL, ⑦ Buckwheat 7.37 UA/mL
RAST Bean Green peas 2.80 UA/mL, ⑧ Soya bean 6.63 UA/mL, Corn 7.98 UA/mL, ③Sesame 12.50 UA/mL
RAST Fruits Orange 4.16 UA/mL, ⑤Apple 9.95 UA/mL, Peach 3.33 UA/mL, Banana 5.57 UA/mL
RAST Vegetable Potato 4.46 UA/mL, Sweet Potato 3.54 UA/mL, ④Pumpkin 10.70 UA/mL
RAST Other food Gelatin > 0.34 UA/mL, Egg white > 0.34 UA/mL, Crab 1.05 UA/mL, Shrimp > 0.34 UA/mL, Blue mussel 0.74 UA/mL, Tuna > 0.34 UA/mL, horse mackerel > 0.34 UA/mL
Prick test Egg white, milk, wheat, soya bean, and sesame were all negative.
[Number is according to a high degree of RAST(UA/mL)]

The patient's clinical course caused us to suspect FDEIAn and, therefore, we performed various allergen tests using his peripheral blood and skin.

The RAST of inhaled Df (mite) antigen of was 33.40 UA/mL at the highest level. The cereal CAP-RAST of rice, wheat, and buckwheat were 12.90, 8.42, and 7.37 UA/mL respectively. The bean CAP-RAST of green peas, soya bean, corn, and sesame were 2.80, 6.63, 7.98, and 12.50 UA/mL respectively. The fruit CAP-RAST of orange, apple, peach, and banana were 4.16, 9.95, 3.33, and 5.57 UA/mL, respectively. The vegetable CAP-RAST of potato, sweet potato, and pumpkin were 4.46, 3.54, and 10.70 UA/mL respectively. The CAP-RAST of other foods: gelatin, egg white, crab, shrimp, blue mussel, tuna, and horse mackerel were > 0.34, > 0.34, 1.05, > 0.34, 0.74, and > 0.34 UA/mL respectively. The CAP-RAST results were mostly positive [1], especially those of food items, which were positive with high levels, and rice exhibited the highest level. Furthermore, the detection of so many positive food allergens is a very rare occurrence. We could not perform allergy test for Japanese Meddler because no RAST and prick test kits are available.

2.3. Hydroxyzine and montelukast effectively prevented FDEIAn (Fig. 1)

Daily administration of hydroxyzine was initiated from October 2005 for the prevention of anaphylaxis in this patient. Daily administration of hydroxyzine only inhibited the appearance of the urticaria but not the respiratory symptoms induced by exercise after meal ingestion (Fig. 1). Therefore, after a 2-month treatment with hydroxyzine, daily administration of montelukast was added to the regimen with the aim of avoiding airway contraction induced by exercise after food take. Oral administration of hydroxyzine and montelukast inhibited all the symptoms of FDEIAn in this patient.

2.4. Comparison of histamine and montelukast (Table 2)

Table 2.

Comparisons of histamine and leukotriene.

Histamine Leukotriene
Producing cells Mast cells, lung, liver, gastric mucosa Mast, eosinophil, and other cells
Bronchoconstrictive action Slight > 1000 times that of histamine
Main action Fall in blood pressure, increased vascular permeability, smooth muscle contraction, vascular dilatation, increased glandular secretion Bronchoconstriction, increased respiratory reactivity by eosinophil cell action, increased Th2 cytokine expression and production

Mast cells [2] release histamine and leukotriene (Fig. 2). Although histamine has slight bronchoconstrictive activity, leukotriene [3], [4] has more than 1000 times the activity of histamine (Table 2). This fact suggests that montelukast treatment would be useful in the treatment of anaphylaxis with respiratory symptoms. This case report supports this notion (Fig. 3, Fig. 4).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Chemical mediator, cytokine, and inflammatory cell in allergic reaction.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Murayama Pediatrics, established in 1994, Osaka, Japan.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Three stages of anaphylactic response.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank all the staff who participated for their advice and cooperation in this study.

Acknowledgments

Data accessibility

Data are available with this article.

Footnotes

Transparency document

Transparency data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.097.

Transparency document. Supplementary material

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (15.4KB, docx)

.

References

  • 1.Caffarelli C., Cataldi R., Giordano S., Cavagni G. Anaphylaxis induced by exercise and related to multiple food intake. Allergy Asthma Proc. 1997;18:245–248. doi: 10.2500/108854197778594007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reber L.L., Hernandez J.D., Galli S.J. The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017;140:335–348. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gajbhiye S., Agrawal R.P., Atal S., Tiwari V., Phadnis P. Exercise-induced anaphylaxis and antileukotriene Montelukast. J Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2015;6:163–165. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.162007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peroni D.G., Piacentini G.L., Piazza M., Cametti E., Boner A.L. Combined cetirizine-montelukast preventive treatment for food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;104:272–273. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (15.4KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data are available with this article.


Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES