Skip to main content
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports logoLink to International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
. 2018 Apr 18;46:62–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.04.006

Brachiocephalic A-V fistula through the median cubital vein; A reliable option to failure of forearm fistulas. A case report from CHU Yaoundé

Marc Leroy Guifo a,, Denis Georges Teuwafeu b, Motto Georges Bwelle c, Guy Aristide Bang a, Mefiré Alain Chichom d, Aurelien Ndoumbe e, Arthur Georges Essomba a
PMCID: PMC6000773  PMID: 29689520

Highlights

  • We describe a brachiocephalic access created with retrograde flow through the median cubital vein.

  • Anatomical consideration for choice of a vascular access for maintenance haemodialysis are review.

  • This access can be useful to avoid difficulties of venipuncture of brachiobasilic fistula and in failure of forearm fitulas.

Keywords: End stage kidney disease, Hemodialysis, Vascular access, Median cubital vein

Abstract

Introduction

Renal replacement therapy in end-stage kidney disease relies on dialysis in low-income countries. This maintenance treatment needs a reliable vascular access and is done through central venous catheter or creation of A-V fistulas. Several types of A-V fistulas can be done but due to some individual conditions, those possibilities may be exhausted rapidly.

Case presentation

A 31 year old female was diagnosed with an end stage renal disease for which she was prescribed maintenance dialysis. She first denied her condition and went to traditional healer. After some months her clinical state worsened and she was dialyse with catheter and refer to us for A-V fistula construction. The first two attempts on the forearm failed and we found small radial artery both proximally and distally on the left forearm. We finally did a left brachiocephalic fistula with initial retrograde flow on the median cubital vein.

Discussion

Despite arm base fistula may be theoretically easy to build because of bigger size vessels, brachiobasilic fistula may be less effective due to difficult venipuncture. Brachiocephalic fistula through median cubital vein may be more effective option with no further procedure needed.

Conclusion

Brachiocephalic fistula should be considered as option in vascular access especially when a reliable option is needed after previous attempt failure.

1. Introduction

Vascular access for permanent hemodialysis is a key issue in treating a patient with chronic renal failure [1], [2], [3]. It needed an artery of good size without wall damage from underlying disease as atherosclerosis, calcification and a patent superficial venous network that has not been spoiled by a repetitive venous puncture [4]. For each individual patient, the condition is variable and it is mandatory to clinically evaluate the possibilities to choose the most suitable for timely maturation. On the other side several surgical sites of native A-V fistula has been developed in the surgical literature as well as several tips to improve the effectiveness of fistulas as elevation, superficialization and retrograde flow [5], [6]. Superficialisation and retrograde flow have been use for Brachiobasilic fistulas because of the difficulties of puncture while the vein is deep-seated. For the brachiocephalic fistulas, the retrograde flow goes through a median cubital vein at the Elbow to reach the cephalic vein that is more easily accessible at the arm level. For some cases when the cephalic vein is already damage, blood may return through a consistent perforating vein to the deep system [7]. We report here a case of brachiocephalic fistula through a median cubital vein that was used for a patient with two anterior angioaccess failures on the same limb. This case report is in line with the SCARE criteria [8].

2. Case report

The patient in this case report aged 31 Year old was diagnosed with an end-stage renal disease due to hypertension for which she started hemodialysis in December 2016. She first denied the medical treatment as recommended and went to traditional healers. After sometimes her case worsens and she was transferred to Yaoundé General Hospital, where the dialysis was initiated as an emergency with a temporal catheter. She was addressed to us for a permanent vascular access in March 2017 (three months after initiation of dialysis). After the clinical examination, we found a good patent cephalic vein but with a poorly perceived pulse at the wrist on both sides. We decided nevertheless to attempt a Brescia and Cimino type A-V fistula on the left side since she was a right-handed but per operatively we found a very thin radial artery of 2 mm like diameter and we perform the fistula that initially work but later stop vibrating (Fig. 1). Another attempt was done on the same side at the antecubital fossa that also stops working a week later (Fig. 1) (ref) [9]. We have two possibilities left for a native fistula on that upper limb: the Brachio-basilic fistula with the risk of difficult venipuncture and the necessity of superficialisation or the brachiocephalic fistula with a retrograde flow through the median cubital vein. We did the Brachio-cephalic fistula with the retrograde flow with a favorable short-term outcome and successful access for hemodialysis (Fig. 2, Fig. 3) the proximal end of the median cubital vein was ligated to have an end to side anastomosis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Image of the forearm with the previous site at the distal radial artery (Cimino-Brescia) and proximal radial artery fistula.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Brachiocephalic fistula with a retrograde flow in the median cubital vein. The forearm cephalic vein is ligated before the division and a perforating deep vein is also ligated at the antecubital fossa of the elbow.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The brachiocephalic fistula after wound healing and beginning of venipuncture.

3. Discussion

Vascular access for maintenance hemodialysis has been a significant advance in the management of end-stage chronic renal failure [3], [10], [11]. The first such access was realized since 1966 by Brescia and Cimino who did a radio-cephalic A-V fistula at the distal forearm for maintenance dialysis. Several types of A-V shunt has been described since that time and it is agreed that hierarchically it remains the “workhorse” for the creation of A–V shunt [11], [12], [13]. Many factors nevertheless influence the choice of a type of vascular access among which the patency of the venous network, the quality of the pulse feel on that site or through Doppler assessment, the age of the patient with a general principle to avoid distal fistulas in children due to small size vessels. Some vascular differences may be congenital such as high division of the brachial artery with a small radial artery at the wrist that incidence is reported to be as high as 15–20% [7]. Our patient had a small distal radial artery (DRA) that to our opinion was the reason for failure in the previous two attempts but we could not do angiography of the upper limb. We could have done another trial on the distal right forearm but we believe since the anatomy could be the same it wouldn’t have been more successful. The A–V fistula with the retrograde flow is known and use in angioacess for dialysis but with outflow based on perforating veins in the antecubital fossa [13]. In this case, the flow was directed to the cephalic arm vein by ligating the perforating vein at the elbow and the forearm cephalic vein. The dilatation of the vein that we usually do by injection of the saline mix with heparin (100 UI for 10 ml of 0.9% saline) is useful for venous dilatation and possibly valves destruction that favor early maturation. This procedure seems the best to take advantage of the cephalic vein patency at the arm level where it is seldom punctured for IV line or blood sample. Vascular mapping with ultrasound in such cases may be helpful to locate the vessels and to confirm the patency before undertaking the surgery. The main difficulty of this fistula is to be certain of the cephalic vein patency before undertaking the procedure since it is sometimes difficult in obese patients and if the blood outflow from the dialysis machine was anteriorly done on that vein segment. There is also need to have an approach that can allow the fistula creation and the ligation of the perforating vein and forearm cephalic vein. In this case, we did two separate incisions (Fig. 3) but it can also be done through a single incision but with the risk of scaring at the elbow fossa and some functional limitation. Despite all the precautions taken to choose the site of the fistula and to make the anastomosis, several complications may occur among which the most annoying is clotting of the fistula and concomitant failure [14], [15], [16]. With the time going many tips and tricks have been develop to overcome those complications as close monitoring both clinically and with ultrasound, fistula dilatation, early revision [17], [18]. Each measure needs to feet in the clinical context of patient and may sometimes be unrealistic. It is therefore essential to choose at the onset a type of fistula that will prevent the patient to go through uncertainty [19], [20].

4. Conclusion

Secondary vascular access remains a challenging situation for the surgeon specifically when the conditions of the past failures are not evident. Patients are frightened by the past failure experience and the physician is getting short of vascular sites possibilities. Use of a reliable site for fistula construction becomes an important clue in recreating motivation of the patient and improves compliance with treatment. A brachiocephalic fistula is a very proof effective one because of an artery of very good size and a vein of good caliber and patency. The surgeon must overcome the difficulties of surgery mainly with a nontraumatic and meticulous technique of dissection, anastomosis and limitation of secondary outflow through common and uncommon tributaries of the median cubital vein.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

The study didn’t use any funding from a third party.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the scientific research committee in the CHU of Yaoundé

Consent

The patient gave her consent to the scientific use of her case and the figures herein.

Author contribution

Guifo ML, Teuwafeu DG, Bwelle MG, Bang G A contribute in the collection of the data and the manuscript writing, Chichom MA, Ndoumbé A, Essomba AG critically revise the manuscript.

Registration of research studies

Not applicable.

Guarantor

Guifo Marc Leroy.

References

  • 1.National Kidney Foundation K/QODI Clinical practice guidelines for vascular acces, 2000. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2001;37(Suppl. (1)):137–181. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Biuckians A., Scott E.C., Meier G.H., Panneton J.M., Glickman M.H. The natural history of autologous fistulas as first-time dialysis access in the KDOQI era. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008;47(February (2)):415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Drukker William. Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; Dordrecht: 1983. Haemodialysis. A historical review. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.William Jennings C. Creation arteriovenous fistula in 132 consecutive patients. Exploiting the proximal radial artery arteriovenous fistula: relaible, safe, and simple forearm and upper arm hemodialysis access. Arch. Surg. 2006;14:27–32. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.1.27. (1 st ed.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cull David L., Taylor Spence M., Carsten Christopher G., Youkey Jerry R., Snyder Bruce A., Sullivan Timothy M., Langan Eugene M. The fistula elevation procedure: a valuable technique for maximizing arteriovenous fistula utilization. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2016;16:84–88. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bourquelot P., Karam L., Robert-Ebadi H., Pirozzi N. Transposition, elevation, lipectomy and V-Wing for easy needling. J. Vasc. Access. 2015;16(Suppl. 9):108–113. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.shenoy Surrendra. surgical anatomy of upper arm: what is needed for AVF planning. J. Vasc. Access. 2009;10:223–232. doi: 10.1177/112972980901000401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Agha R.A., Fowler A.J., Saetta A., Barai I., Rashmohan S., Orgill D.P. The SCARE statement: consensus-based surgical case report guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2016;34:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Di Salvo Enrico, Federico Stefano, Vittorio E. Kluwer academic publishers; Andreucci V.E: 1989. Andreucci Arteriovenous Fistula. In: Vascular and Peritoneal Access for Dialysis. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Williams G. The Treatment of Renal Failure. MTP Press Limited; 1982. Vascular access; pp. 197–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dadah S.K., Samham M., Omar O.F., Abouna G.M. The Current Status of Clinical Organ Transplantation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1984. Current status of clinical organ transplantation. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guifo M.L., Kaze F.F., Ndoumbe A., Halle M.P., Bitang L.J., Pisoh C.T. Fistule artério-veineuse ulno-basilique pour hémodialyse au CHU de Yaoundé: à propos de deux cas. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2013 doi: 10.11604/pamj.2013.15.103.2906. (Internet [cited 2017 Nov 5];15. Available from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/15/103/full/) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.shapira Z., Shmueli D., Yussim A., Servadio C. Acces Surgery. MTP Press Limited; 1983. Antecubital arteriovenous fistulas with reverse flow. (Koostra, et al.) [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pirozzi N., Pettorini L., Scrivano J., Menè P., Karam L., Bourquelot P. Limberg skin flap for treatment of necrosis and bleeding at haemodialysis arteriovenous angioaccess puncture sites. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2013;46(September (3)):383–387. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.erasmi H., Horsch S., schmidt R., Pichlmaier H. Access Surgery. MTP press Limited; 1983. Complications of arteriovenous fistulas and surgical intervention. (G Kootstra et al., 1983) [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gerstoft J., Mortensen J., Morgensen N.B. Acces Surgery. MTP press limited; 1983. A Uhrenholdt. haemodynamic consequences of arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis: a prospective study. (G Kootstra, et al.) [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bourquelot P., Pirozzi N. Tips and tricks in creation of forearm arteriovenous fistulae. J. Vasc. Access. 2014;15(Suppl. 7):45–49. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Heidler R., Zeitler E., Gessler U. Percutaneous Vascular Recanalization. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberg: 1978. Percutaneous transluminal dilatation of stenosis behind AV-fistulas in hemodialysis patients. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Baktiroglu S., Yanar F., Ozturk A. Brachiocephalic and basilic fistula. J. Vasc. Access. 2015;16(March (9 Suppl.)):29–33. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim J.J., Gifford E., Nguyen V., Kaji A.H., Chisum P., Zeng A. Increased use of brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas improves functional primary patency. J. Vasc. Surg. 2015;62(August (2)):442–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Surgery Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES