ABSTRACT
Bacteriophage therapy can potentially reduce Campylobacter jejuni numbers in livestock, but it requires a detailed understanding of phage-host interactions. C. jejuni strains readily infected by certain phages are designated as phage-propagating strains. Here, we report the complete genome sequences of three such strains, NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Campylobacter jejuni causes diarrheal disease worldwide, and C. jejuni infections arise from consuming and mishandling contaminated poultry (1–3). Phages are being explored as antibiotic alternatives to reduce this burden (4–6). Phages are highly strain specific, so understanding the factors that contribute to this specificity, including capsular polysaccharides (CPSs), flagella (7), and restriction/modification systems (8, 9), can maximize the strain range targeted (10).
C. jejuni strains were historically tracked based on phage susceptibility (11, 12). For these typing schemes, each phage was designated a readily infected “phage-propagating” strain. To identify factors governing phage susceptibility in C. jejuni, we sequenced the genomes of three C. jejuni phage-propagating strains isolated from chickens (12), NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664.
Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the PacBio RS and Illumina MiSeq sequencing platforms. PacBio sequence data were assembled to construct a single closed chromosomal contig for each strain. MiSeq reads were used to validate base calls and to determine the variability at each poly-G tract. Protein-, rRNA-, and tRNA-coding genes were identified as described previously (13). The genome sizes ranged from 1.61 to 1.68 Mb with an average GC content of 30.6%. The three genomes show high similarity to strain NCTC 11168, although NCTC 12660 has at least one small inversion compared to NCTC 11168. These four genomes encode a similar number of genes and pseudogenes, with the genome of NCTC 12660 slightly larger due to the presence of a genomic island. Many of the pseudogenes identified were conserved across all or most of the three strains and NCTC 11168.
We identified several differences in restriction/modification (R/M) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems between these strains. Relative to the others, NCTC 12661 lacks a type I R/M system, NCTC 12661 and NCTC 12664 lack the type IIG restriction endonuclease (RE) cj1051, NCTC 12661 uniquely encodes a type III R/M system and the type IIG RE (locus tag CJ12661_0039), and the type IV R/M system subunit mcrB is a pseudogene in NCTC 12660. Interestingly, all but NCTC 12664 encode a full type II-C CRISPR/Cas system, with cas9 a pseudogene in NCTC 12664.
CPS variability influences C. jejuni phage susceptibility (7, 14), but flagellar glycans play an unknown role (15). Strains NCTC 12661 and NCTC 12664 cluster separately from NCTC 12660 and NCTC 11168 in CPS and flagellar glycosylation gene content, which could lead to differences in phage-host interactions. In addition to C. jejuni strain-strain variation, within-strain genome variation has been observed (16, 17). We compared our NCTC 12661 sequence to two prior genomes sequenced for this strain: GenBank accession numbers CP010906 (18) and CP020045 (17). Two alleles for pseD, encoding the flagellar acetamidino-substituted pseudaminic acid transferase, were previously observed (17, 19). Our NCTC 12661 pseD was 100% and 86% identical to these alleles. The pseD sequence from the earliest NCTC 12661 genome (18) has regions of similarity to each of the pseD genes from the subsequently sequenced genomes. This suggests possible recombination, although sequencing or assembly issues could be responsible. Either scenario could be explained by the many pseD homologs encoded by most C. jejuni strains (20). This example highlights the plasticity of C. jejuni genomes.
Accession number(s).
The complete genome sequences of C. jejuni strains NCTC 12660, NCTC 12661, and NCTC 12664 have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP028910, CP028911, and CP028912, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
J.C.S. is a recipient of an NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Student Scholarship. C.M.S. is an Alberta Innovates Strategic Chair in Bacterial Glycomics.
Footnotes
Citation Sacher JC, Yee E, Szymanski CM, Miller WG. 2018. Complete genome sequences of three Campylobacter jejuni phage-propagating strains. Genome Announc 6:e00514-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00514-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Fitzgerald C. 2015. Campylobacter. Clin Lab Med 35:289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wassenaar TM. 2011. Following an imaginary Campylobacter population from farm to fork and beyond: a bacterial perspective. Lett Appl Microbiol 53:253–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2011.03121.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaakoush NO, Mitchell HM, Man SM. 2015. Campylobacter, p. 1187–1236. In Molecular medical microbiology, 2nd ed Academic Press, London, UK. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-397169-2.00067-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zampara A, Sørensen MCH, Elsser-Gravesen A, Brøndsted L. 2017. Significance of phage-host interactions for biocontrol of Campylobacter jejuni in food. Food Control 73:1169–1175. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.10.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hammerl JA, Jäckel C, Alter T, Janzcyk P, Stingl K, Knüver MT, Hertwig S. 2014. Reduction of Campylobacter jejuni in broiler chicken by successive application of group II and group III phages. PLoS One 9:e114785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kittler S, Fischer S, Abdulmawjood A, Glünder G, Klein G. 2013. Effect of bacteriophage application on Campylobacter jejuni loads in commercial broiler flocks. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7525–7533. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02703-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sørensen MCH, Gencay YE, Birk T, Baldvinsson SB, Jäckel C, Hammerl JA, Vegge CS, Neve H, Brøndsted L. 2015. Primary isolation strain determines both phage type and receptors recognised by Campylobacter jejuni bacteriophages. PLoS One 10:e0116287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dupuis M-È, Villion M, Magadán AH, Moineau S. 2013. CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance. Nat Commun 4:2087. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gardner SP, Olson JW. 2012. Barriers to horizontal gene transfer in Campylobacter jejuni, p 19–42. In Sariaslani S, Gadd GM (ed), Advances in applied microbiology, vol. 79. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394318-7.00002-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fischer S, Kittler S, Klein G, Glünder G. 2013. Impact of a single phage and a phage cocktail application in broilers on reduction of Campylobacter jejuni and development of resistance. PLoS One 8:e78543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grajewski BA, Kusek JW, Gelfand HM. 1985. Development of a bacteriophage typing system for Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Clin Microbiol 22:13–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frost JA, Kramer JM, Gillanders SA. 1999. Phage typing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli and its use as an adjunct to serotyping. Epidemiol Infect 123:47–55. doi: 10.1017/S095026889900254X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Miller WG, Yee E, Chapman MH, Smith TPL, Bono JL, Huynh S, Parker CT, Vandamme P, Luong K, Korlach J. 2014. Comparative genomics of the Campylobacter lari group. Genome Biol Evol 6:3252–3266. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sørensen MCH, van Alphen LB, Harboe A, Li J, Christensen BB, Szymanski CM, Brondsted L. 2011. Bacteriophage F336 recognizes the capsular phosphoramidate modification of Campylobacter jejuni NCTC11168. J Bacteriol 193:6742–6749. doi: 10.1128/JB.05276-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baldvinsson SB, Sørensen MCH, Vegge CS, Clokie MRJ, Brøndsted L. 2014. Campylobacter jejuni motility is required for infection of the flagellotropic bacteriophage F341. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:7096–7106. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02057-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wassenaar TM, Geilhausen B, Newell DG. 1998. Evidence of genomic instability in Campylobacter jejuni isolated from poultry. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1816–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gardner SP, Kendall KJ, Taveirne ME, Olson JW. 2017. Complete genome sequence of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni ATCC 35925. Genome Announc 5(30):e00743-17. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00743-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ghaffar NM, Connerton PL, Connerton IF. 2015. Filamentation of Campylobacter in broth cultures. Front Microbiol 6:657. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Guerry P, Ewing CP, Schirm M, Lorenzo M, Kelly J, Pattarini D, Majam G, Thibault P, Logan S. 2006. Changes in flagellin glycosylation affect Campylobacter autoagglutination and virulence. Mol Microbiol 60:299–311. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karlyshev AV, Linton D, Gregson NA, Wren BW. 2002. A novel paralogous gene family involved in phase-variable flagella-mediated motility in Campylobacter jejuni. Microbiology 148:473–480. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-2-473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]