Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2018 Apr 18;10(4):e2502. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2502

Imaging of Sodium MRI for Therapy Evaluation of Brain Metastase with Cyberknife at 7T: A Case Report

Lichao Huang 1, Zihao Zhang 2, Baolin Qu 3, Zhiqiang Cui 1, Yao Wang 3, Jiwei Li 3, Jinyuan Wang 3, Zhentao Zuo 4, Yan Zhuo 4, Xinguang Yu 1, Zhipei Lin 1, Longsheng Pan 1,
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC6005396  PMID: 29928562

Abstract

Herein we describe the case of an elderly patient who presented with a recent history of impaired vision of the right eye around three months due to brain lesions. He was diagnosed with liver cancer and underwent surgery three months prior. The pathological result is hepatocellular carcinoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed the diagnosis of brain to be metastatic. The patient selected CyberKnife (Accuray Incorporated, Sunnyvale, USA) radiosurgery for the brain lesion since his physical conditions are not suitable for craniotomy. We adapt the imaging of sodium MRI and proton diffusion mapping at 7T MR system to evaluate the efficacy following CyberKnife early stage treatment. To date, we find the tissue sodium concentration (TSC) changes with the time whereas the proton MRI has no significant change within one month. The time course of sodium concentration in the tumor showed a dramatic increase in the treated brain tumor compared to the pretreatment sodium concentration and 48 hours after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), which is correlated to the period of the radiotherapy-induced cellular necrosis. This case demonstrates the possibility of sodium MRI as a biomarker for monitoring early radiotherapy for assessing tumor cellularity.

Keywords: sodium mri, brain metastase, cyberknife, tissue sodium concentration (tsc)

Introduction

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established and effective treatment for brain metastases (BM). The proton MRI is used to evaluate the volume of tumor change after radiotherapy by RECIST (Response Evaluation Citeria in Solid Tumors). However, the changes in the level of tumor cells could not be reflected. In contrast, sodium MRI could reveal tumor microenvironment. Schepkin et al. have investigated the changes of sodium signal of rat brain tumor model in response to the chemotherapy [1]. In our study, we investigated the sequence of changes in the sodium MRI signal in the brain metastasis following CyberKnife radiosurgery and the main focus is on the evaluation for the early response after SRS procedure with CyberKnife.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old man who presented with a recent history of impaired vision of right eye for about 3 months due to brain lesions.  He was diagnosed with liver cancer and underwent surgery three months ago. The pathological result is hepatocellular carcinoma. His right eye showed impaired vision and the proton MRI revealed brain metastasis located in the right orbital part (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Initial T1 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Figure 1

Axial (A),Coronal (B) and Sagittal (C) T1 Contrast-enhanced MRI imaging revealed an cranio-orbital tumor(arrow).

The patient was not suitable for the surgical excision due to his poor physical conditions after liver tumor resection. CyberKnife radiosurgery was delivered at a dose of 22.5 Gy in three fractions (Figure 2-3).

Figure 2. CyberKnife radiosurgery planing.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Cyberknife radiosurgery planing.

Figure 3

Both sodium and proton MRI (Siemens Magnetom 7T, Erlangen, Germany) were performed periodically at 7T by the time schedule of pre-treatment, 48 hours after SRS, with one week follow up and one month follow up. The scan parameters are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Scan parameters.

FOV (Field of view)

FLAIR (Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery)

DWI (Diffusion Weighted Imaging)

             Scan Parameters
Sequence FOV(mm) Resolution(mm) Time(min)
T1 224x203x179 0.70x0.70x0.70 5:06
T2 190x199x103 0.26x0.26x2.5 7:28
FlAIR 220x199x117 0.43x0.43x3.0 7:58
DWI 196x196x120 2.0x2.0x2.0 4:48
Sodium 224x224x224 3.5x3.5x3.5 ~14:00

The sodium signal in the tumor is obviously higher than the opposite normal brain tissue within one month after SRS (E-H). However, the T2 magnetic resonance imaging reveals no obvious changes (A-D) (Figure 4).

Figure 4. T2-weight imaging and sodium MRI.

Figure 4

Axial T2-weight MRI with pretreatment (A), 48 hours after treatment (B), post-treatment of 1 week (C) and post-treatment of 1 month (D). Axial Sodium MRI Images with pretreatment (E)  48 hours after treatment (B), post-treatment of 1 week (C), post-treatment of 1 month (D)

The quantified sodium signal intensity in MRI was shown in Table 2.

Table 2. Sodium MRI Signal Intensity.

Scan untreated 48 hours one week one month
Tumor 1599.729244 1619.115858 1551.354553 1703.269578
Ventricle 1195.083046 1188.588231 1226.508085 1233.800309
Ratio 1.338592535 1.362217643 1.26485473 1.380506688

The time course of sodium signal intensity in the tumor showed a dramatic increase in the treated brain tumor compared to the pretreatment and SRS within 48 hours. And the signal intensity decreased at one week after SRS compared to 48 hours after SRS. However, the increased signal intensity was observed at one month. The TSC ratio of tumor to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is much more intuitive (Figure 5).

Figure 5. The TSC ratio of tumor and cerebrospinal fluid.

Figure 5

The sodium signal intensity of ROI (region of interest) located in the center of tumor (A) as well as the sodium signal intensity of CSF in lateral ventricle (B) were quantified. The ratio of sodium signal intensity in tumor and CSF is shown clearly (C).

Discussion

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming a recognized, fashionable treatment option for brain metastases with reported excellent local control rates. And the multi-session SRS delivered by CyberKnife is an effective option for the treatment of intraorbital lesions with tumor size shrinkage, pain relieving, and vision preserved. The fractionated scheme applied in our study with a dose of 22.5 Gy in three fractions is based on the indication of SRS.

The therapeutic responses of brain tumors are conventionally assessed by size and contrast enhancement characteristics on CT or MRI images. With the advancement of molecular imaging, biomarkers are adopted with its ability to reflect the early prediction of treatment outcome since cellular changes occur earlier, before tumor shrinkage observed [2]. Sodium ions (23Na+) are vital components in human brains, and the cellular homeostasis process is through coupled exchange with potassium ions K+ between the intra- and extra-cellular compartments by Na+/K+-ATPase (sodium-potassium pump) [3]. Dysregulation of the sodium-potassium pump, or of ATP-dependent processes in the cells will provoke dysregulation of ion homeostasis and therefore leads to an increase of intracellular sodium concentration (TSC) as the gradient cannot be sustained anymore, and furthermore to cell death [4]. These bio scales (TSC) can monitor the spatial distribution of tissue responses to radiation treatment on at least a weekly basis and could be used to guide adaptive radiation treatment for each patient and avoid excessive radiation when no response can be achieved [5]. Our study was to investigate the TSC change before the tumor shrinkage in humans.

Data presented in this our study reveal that the sodium signal in pretreatment tumor is obviously higher than the opposite normal brain tissue. Because the cell membrane depolarization precedes cell division in proliferative neoplastic tissue, leads to an increase in the intracellular sodium concentration and a concomitant rise in the total sodium concentration in the tumor tissue [6]. The first TSC peaks after CyberKnife radiosurgery within 48 hours. Sodium overload may have a strong connection with apoptosis and even initiate apoptosis itself [7]. We consider that the first TSC peak in 48 hours is related to radiotherapy-induced apoptosis. The second TSC peak in one month may be related to tumor recurrence, however, further pathological results could not be obtained. Further MRI examination will be performed by image findings.

The sodium MRI offers complementary information which could be quantitatively measured and it is non-invasive. Even though the clinical value of sodium MRI as a complement to proton MRI or other imaging modalities such as PET and CT is still under investigation [8], our study shows the clinical value with due to the biochemical information provided.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we present a case of complicated brain metastatic treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery. The case demonstrates the possibility of sodium MRI as a biomarker for monitoring early radiotherapy for assessing tumor cellularity. The noninvasive and rapid feedback may be used to guide the management of brain tumors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fernando E. Boada from New York University for providing the twisted projection imaging sequence and tunning the scanning parameters. This work was supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China grant (2015CB351701), and the National Nature Science Foundation of China grant (91132302). In the meanwhile, the authors acknowledge Dr. Jiuhong Chen for her valuable advice in revising the manuscript.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

We want to know if the co-author Zihao Zhang could be listed as co-first author?

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. The Institutional Review Board of Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research issued approval 2004-IRB-001. I confirm that the purpose of the research, the study procedures and the possible risks and discomforts as well as potential benefits that I may experience have been explained to me. All my questions have been satisfactorily answered. I have read this consent form. My signature below indicates my willingness to participate in this study.

References

  • 1.Sodium magnetic resonance imaging of chemotherapeutic response in a rat glioma[J] Schepkin VD, Ross BD, Chenevert TL, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:85–92. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moffat BA, Chenevert TL, Lawrence TS, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Vol. 102. U S A; 2005. Functional diffusion map: a noninvasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response; pp. 5524–5529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Understanding the sodium pump and its relevance to disease. Rose AM, Valdes R. http://clinchem.aaccjnls.org/content/40/9/1674.long. Clin Chem. 1994;40:1674–1685. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Loss of cell ion homeostasis and cell viability in the brain: what sodium MRI can tell us. Boada FE, LaVerde G, Jungreis C, et al. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2005;70:77–101. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)70004-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Quantitative sodium MR imaging and sodium bioscales for the management of brain tumors. Thulborn KR1, Lu A, Atkinson IC, Damen F, Villano JL. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2009;19:615–624. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2009.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tissue sodium concentration in human brain tumors as measured with 23Na MR imaging. Ouwerkerk R, Bleich KB, Gillen JS, Pomper MG, Bottomley PA. Radiology. 2003;227:9–537. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sodium overload through voltage-dependent Na(+) channels induces necrosis and apoptosis of rat superior cervical ganglion cells in vitro. Koike T, Tanaka S, Oda T, Ninomiya T. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10704786/ Brain Res. 2000;51:345–355. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(99)00246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Biomedical applications of sodium MRI in vivo. Madelin G, Regatte RR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38:511–529. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES