Abstract
The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnosis of methylation of CDX2 gene promoter in colorectal cancer (CRC) and assessed its value in the prediction of treatment efficacy. Sixty patients who were diagnosed as CRCs for the first time, 60 patients with hyperplastic polyps (HPs) and adenomas, and 60 patients with inflammatory lesions or healthy patients (control group) were included in the present study. The methylation levels of CDX2 gene promoter were detected by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP), and the expression levels of CDX2 mRNA were detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR. Treatment options, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were chosen on the basis of TNM staging of CRC patients. The tumor-free survival, relapse rate and mortality were also recorded. The methylation rate was 71.67% (43/60) and significantly higher in the CRC group as compared to the HP/adenoma and control groups, P<0.05. Moreover, they showed further increase with higher degree of TNM staging. The expression levels of CDX2 mRNA was significantly lower in the CRC group in comparison to HP/adenoma and control groups, P<0.05, and showed a further decrease with a higher degree of TNM staging. The tumor-free survival was shorter, and the relapse rate and mortality were higher in patients with positive methylation in the CRC group, P<0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TNM staging and positive methylation were independent risk factors of mortality. In conclusion, higher methylation degree of CDX2 gene promoter resulted in decreased expression of CDX2 gene, and was closely associated with TNM staging and prognosis. TNM staging and positive methylation were independent risk factors of mortality for CRC patients.
Keywords: colorectal cancer, CDX2 gene, methylation of promoter
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is ranked 3rd in males and 2nd in females with respect to the incidence of malignancy globally. However, it is ranked as 4th with respect to the incidence of mortality. With increasing prevalence and a trend of young age, CRC has now become a great threat to human life (1).
The pathogenesis mechanisms of CRC include direct infiltration and transformation of carcinoma in situ, ‘adenoma - adenocarcinoma’ classical APC pathway and ‘hyperplastic polyps (HPs)-serrated adenoma - carcinoma’ serrated pathway, which accounted for 35%, and HP accounted for 75% of total serrated lesions (2). The serrated pathway was a continuously accumulated process with multiple factors, segments and genes, and abnormal methylation of gene promoter and loss of heterozygous genes were very common (3). Type A and C methylation of genes occurred. Type A was associated with age, increasing age lead to higher frequency of methylation; type C was associated with tumor, abnormal methylation caused the downregulation or silencing of relevant genes, and promoted the pathogenesis of tumor (4). Currently, the abnormal methylation of many genes, such as PCDH-γ-A12, SLC19A1, CREB and CYLD, has been related to the pathogenesis of serrated lesion in CRC (5). In addition, CDX2 is an important specific nuclear transcription factor in gastrointestinal abnormality, and involved in the pathogenesis and development of gastric cancer and CRC (6).
The present study examined whether abnormal methylation of CDX2 was related to serrated lesion and clinical efficacy of CRC, and provide sensitive and precise measurement for the early diagnosis and prognosis of CRC.
Patients and methods
Patient information
Sixty patients who were diagnosed as CRC for the first time, 60 patients with HPs and adenomas, and 60 patients with inflammatory lesions or healthy patients (control group) were included in this study from January 2013 to January 2016. All these conditions were confirmed pathologically. Patients with colorectal metastases, primary malignancy in other site or insufficient clinical information were excluded. The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the above study and informed consent was obtained from the patients. The CRC group included 36 males and 24 females, with a mean age of 56.7±13.3 years; 13 patients of TNM stage intermediate-I, 20 patients of stage II, 15 patients of stage III and 12 patients of stage IV; mean tumor length, 1.8±0.5 cm and mean number of tumor lesion, 1.3±0.4. The HP and adenoma group included 33 males and 27 females with a mean age of 55.8±14.5 years. The control group comprised 32 males and 28 females, mean age of 56.8±15.2 years. The sex and age between the 3 groups were comparable.
Methods
Methylation level of CDX2 gene promoter detected by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP)
Extraction of DNA in samples was performed as instructed in extraction kit for Animal Genome (Axygen Biosciences, Inc., Union City, CA, USA). Modification of DNA by bisulfite was performed as instructed in kit for MethylDetector Bisulfite Modification (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Methylation-specific primers were designed according to the instructions (Table I). The reaction system (25 µl) of MSP included 8.5 µl ddH2O, 2 µl modified DNA, 12.5 µl Premix Ex Taq DNA polymerase mixture and 2 µl methylation-specific or non-methylation-specific primers.
Table I.
MSP primers.
| Primers | Sequences | Length of products (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| Forward methylation-specific primers | 5′-CGAAAATAAATCACTACGACG-3′ | 200 |
| Forward non-methylation-specific primers | 5′-ATTCAAAATAAAAATCACTACAACA-3′ | 204 |
| Universal reverse primers | 5′-AAAGGATATTGGAGAGTATTTTAG-3′ |
MSP, methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.
PCR reactions were: 95°C for 3 min; 95°C for 30 sec; 58°C for 30 sec; 72°C for 30 sec; 30 cycles, extension at 72°C for 10 min, and stored at 4°C. PCR products were extracted after gel electrophoresis and sequenced (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The interpretation criteria of electrophoresis were: Positive amplification with methylation-specific primers and negative amplification with non methylation-specific primers indicated complete methylation, recorded as positive methylation; positive amplification with methylation-specific primers and positive amplification with non methylation-specific primers indicated partial methylation, also recorded as positive methylation; negative amplification with methylation-specific primers and positive amplification with non methylation-specific primers indicated no methylation, recorded as negative methylation.
Expression level of CDX2 mRNA detected by fluorescence quantitative PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent. The concentration and purity of extracted RNA were measured by a UV spectrophotometer, and the integrity extracted RNA was detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription of cDNA was performed with a Takara PrimeScript® 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Takara Bio, Inc., Otsu, Japan). The primers against CDX2 DNA (Pubmed) were designed with Primer Premier 5 software (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and aligned in Blast to verify the specificity. The primers used were (Table I): CDX2 forward, 5′-CCGAGCCCTACGGTGCCT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGAATCGCTGTCGTTGAAA-3′; internal control GAPDH forward, 5′-TGGGTGTGAACCACGAGAA-3′ and reverse, 5′-GGCATGGACTGTGGTCATGA-3′. The RT-PCR reaction system (20 µl) included 10 µl Taq enzyme mix, 1 µl forward primer and 1 µl reverse primer, 6 µl enzyme-free H2O. The RT-PCR procedure used was: Pre-denaturation at 95°C, 3 min; denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec; annealing at 57°C, 30 sec; extension at 72°C, 30 sec; extension at 72°C, 5 min; 35 cycles, and stored at 4°C. Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed at a voltage of 100 V for 28 min. A gel imager (Fotodyne Inc., Hartland, WI, USA) was used for observation. The results are represented using the 2−ΔΔCq method.
Treatment of CRC
Treatment options, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, were selected on the basis of TNM staging. For stage I and II CRC, laparotomy- or laparoscopy-assisted resection of tumor was preferred, and adjunctive radiotherapy and chemotherapy were used according to lymph node metastasis. For stage III and IV CRC, a combination of adjunctive radiotherapy/chemotherapy, surgical resection or palliative treatment and post-operative radiotherapy/chemotherapy was provided, and the patients were advised to complete at least 3 cycles of radiotherapy/chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 5–40 months), and the tumor-free survival, relapse rate and mortality were recorded.
Statistical analysis
SPSS 20.0 statistical software (IBM SPSS, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data are presented by mean ± standard deviation, comparison between groups was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and pairwise comparison was performed by LSD-t-test. Categorical data are presented by number or percentage (%), comparison between groups was performed by Chi-square test. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival curve and log-rank Chi-square test. Factors for survival outcome were analyzed by the logistic regression model, and the factors were screened by a backward stepwise method (inclusion criteria α≤0.10; exclusion criteria α<0.05). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Methylation levels of CDX2 promoter
The methylation rate was 71.67% (43/60) in the CRC group, 55.00% (33/60) in the HP and adenoma group, 16.67% (10/60) in the control group, and the difference between groups was statistically significant, χ2=38.253, P<0.001. In the CRC group, the methylation rate was 53.85% (7/13) for stage I patients, 65.00% (13/20) for stage II patients, 80.00% (12/15) for stage III patients and 83.33% (10/12) for stage IV patients, and the methylation rate increased with worsening malignancy.
Expression levels of CDX2 mRNA
The expression levels of CDX2 mRNA were significantly lower in the CRC group (0.1232±0.0623) than the HP and adenoma group (0.3652±0.0452), and highest in the control group (0.5684±0.1124), F=13.205, P<0.001. In the CRC group, the expression level of CDX2 mRNA was 0.2253±0.0754 for stage I patients, 0.1632±0.0865 for stage II patients, 0.1126±0.0562 for stage III patients and 0.0865±0.0052 for stage IV patients, the expression level of CDX2 mRNA increased with worsening malignancy.
Survival outcome of CRC patients
As shown in Table II, in CRC group, the tumor-free survival was shorter, the relapse rate and mortality were higher, P<0.05.
Table II.
Survival outcome of CRC patients.
| n | Tumor-free survival (months) | Relapse rate (n, %) | Mortality (n, %) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive methylation | 43 | 8.2 | 21 (48.84) | 17 (39.53) |
| Negative methylation | 17 | 12.4 | 3 (17.65) | 2 (11.76) |
| χ2 test | 8.324 | 4.938 | 4.342 | |
| P-value | 0.003 | 0.026 | 0.037 |
CRC, colorectal cancer.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis
As shown in Table III, the CRC patient baseline information (sex, age, TNM staging, maximum tumor size, number of tumors, operation method, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) and the degree of methylation were independent variables, and the survival outcome (mortality) of patients was dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TNM staging (stage I as standard) and positive methylation were independent risk factors of mortality.
Table III.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis.
| Factors | β | Wald | P-value | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage II | 0.032 | 3.628 | 0.024 | 1.052 | 0.532–2.324 |
| Stage III | 0.067 | 4.527 | 0.018 | 1.326 | 0.764–2.105 |
| Stage IV | 0.124 | 4.958 | 0.013 | 1.754 | 1.231–3.226 |
| Positive methylation | 0.231 | 5.326 | 0.010 | 2.135 | 1.526–2.867 |
Discussion
CDX2 is a member of caudal-related homeobox gene family and is a specific transcription factor of intestinal epithelial cells in vivo. Mutoh et al reported that CDX2 gene was involved in regulating the expression of intestine-specific genes, the development of intestine as well as the differentiation and proliferation of intestinal epithelial cells (7). The expression of CDX2 gene was high in intestinal metaplasia associated with chronic atrophic gastritis, and abnormal in gastric cancer, indicating that CDX2 gene was related to metastasis from gastric mucosa to epithelium and carcinogenesis of gastric mucosa. Mizoshita et al transfected CDX2 cDNA into the human HT29 CRC cell line to obtain an overexpression of CDX2 proteins (8). As a result, the cellular carcinogenic potential and metastasis potential were significantly decreased, and the sensitivity to apoptosis was significantly increased (8).
The present study showed that the methylation rate (71.67%) was significantly higher in the CRC group and increased with a higher degree of TNM staging while the expression level of CDX2 mRNA was significantly lower and decreased with a higher degree of TNM staging. Normal pattern of DNA methylation played important regulatory roles in gene expression, embryonic development, genomic imprinting and X-inactivation (9). DNA methylation occurs predominantly in GC-rich region (CpG dinucleotide, CpG island), which was located in gene promoter and first exon, and could regulate gene expression (10). It was previously reported that the CDX2 gene promoter was highly methylated in human MKN45 gastric cancer cell line, and the expression levels of CDX2 mRNA were extremely low and CDX2 protein was not expressed. After incubation with three levels of 5-aza-CdR (inhibitor of methylation) for 72 h, the expression levels of CDX2 mRNA and protein were upregulated in MKN45 cells (11). However, it was reported that the expression of CDX2 gene was related to post-transcriptional regulation, such as the phosphorylation of CDX2 protein, rather than epigenetic modification (DNA methylation, histone acetylation) (12). Kawai et al reported that CDX2 gene promoter was located in two CpG islands, the upstream CpG island was significantly methylated (sodium bisulfite - RFLP method, COBRA) but unrelated to the expression of CDX2, while the downstream CpG island was only methylated in a few CRC cell lines, and was related to the expression of CDX2 directly, i.e., the methylation of downstream region of CDX2 gene promoter caused a significantly decreased expression of CDX2 (13).
The present study further demonstrated that in CRC patients, the tumor-free survival was shorter, the relapse rate and mortality were higher in patients with positive methylation, TNM staging and positive methylation were independent risk factors of mortality. In conclusion, higher methylation degree of CDX2 gene promoter resulted in a decreased expression of CDX2 gene, and was closely related to TNM staging and prognosis. This study had a small sample size and short follow-up, thus further studies are essential in the future.
References
- 1.Yung KW, Yung TT, Chung CY, Tong GT, Liu Y, Henderson J, Welbeck D, Oseni S. Principles of cancer staging. Asian Pac J Surg Oncol. 2015;1:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kawasaki K, Kurahara K, Yanai S, Oshiro Y, Yao T, Kobayashi H, Nakamura S, Fuchigami T, Sugai T, Matsumoto T. Colonoscopic features and malignant potential of sessile serrated adenomas: comparison with other serrated lesions and conventional adenomas. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:795–802. doi: 10.1111/codi.13276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson DH, Taylor WR, Aboelsoud MM, Foote PH, Yab TC, Cao X, Smyrk TC, Loftus EV, Jr, Mahoney DW, Ahlquist DA, et al. DNA methylation and mutation of small colonic neoplasms in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis: implications for surveillance. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016;22:1559–1567. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chang HF, Wu CC, Sun CA, Chu CM, Lin FG, Hsieh JF, Hsu CH, Huang CH, Yang T, Tsai YM, et al. Clinical stage and risk of recurrence and mortality: interaction of DNA methylation factors in patients with colorectal cancer. J Investig Med. 2016;13:17–18. doi: 10.1136/jim-2016-000086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guo YH, Wang LQ, Li B, Xu H, Yang JH, Zheng LS, Yu P, Zhou AD, Zhang Y, Xie SJ, et al. Wnt/β-catenin pathway transactivates microRNA-150 that promotes EMT of colorectal cancer cells by suppressing CREB signaling. Oncotarget. 2016 Jun 7; doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9893. (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bae JM, Lee TH, Cho NY, Kim TY, Kang GH. Loss of CDX2 expression is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1457–1467. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mutoh H, Hayakawa H, Sakamoto H, Sugano K. Homeobox protein CDX2 reduces Cox-2 transcription by inactivating the DNA-binding capacity of nuclear factor-kappaB. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:719–729. doi: 10.1007/s00535-007-2088-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mizoshita T, Tsukamoto T, Nakanishi H, Inada K, Ogasawara N, Joh T, Itoh M, Yamamura Y, Tatematsu M. Expression of Cdx2 and the phenotype of advanced gastric cancers: relationship with prognosis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2003;129:727–734. doi: 10.1007/s00432-003-0499-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6–21. doi: 10.1101/gad.947102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lee MS, McGuffey EJ, Morris JS, Manyam G, Baladandayuthapani V, Wei W, Morris VK, Overman MJ, Maru DM, Jiang ZQ, et al. Association of CpG island methylator phenotype and EREG/AREG methylation and expression in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:1352–1361. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang JF, Qu LS, Qian XF, Xia BL, Mao ZB, Chen WC. Nuclear transcription factor CDX2 inhibits gastric cancer cell growth and reverses epithelial to mesenchymal transition in vitro and in vivo. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:5231–5238. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dawson H, Galván JA, Helbling M, Muller DE, Karamitopoulou E, Koelzer VH, Economou M, Hammer C, Lugli A, Zlobec I. Possible role of Cdx2 in the serrated pathway of colorectal cancer characterized by BRAF mutation, high-level CpG island methylator phenotype and mismatch repair-deficiency. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:2342–2351. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kawai H, Tomii K, Toyooka S, Yano M, Murakami M, Tsukuda K, Shimizu N. Promoter methylation downregulates CDX2 expression in colorectal carcinomas. Oncol Rep. 2005;13:547–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]