Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common digestive malignancies globally, and the prognosis of patients with advanced tumors remains poor. Isocryptotanshinone (ICTS), isolated from Salvia miltiorrhiza, was found to inhibit the proliferation of lung and breast cancer cells. However, whether ICTS has anticancer activities against GC is unknown. In the present study, we reported that the proliferation of GC cells was inhibited by ICTS in a dose- and time-dependent manner. After treatment with ICTS, GC cells were arrested in the G1/G0 phase of cell cycle and the apoptotic cells were induced in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, ICTS suppressed the expression of cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated proteins (e.g., Cyclin D1, phosphorylated Rb, E2F1, Mcl-1, Bcl-2, and Survivin). ICTS inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 in a dose-dependent manner. Down-regulated STAT3 attenuated the expression of Cyclin D1, p-Rb, and Survivin, which remarkably increased the sensitivity of ICTS in GC cells; overexpression of STAT3 restored the cell growth and proliferation and the protein expression suppressed by ICTS. ICTS also suppressed the xenograft tumor growth in BALB/c nude mice. Together, these data indicate that ICTS inhibits GC proliferation by inducing G1/G0 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via inhibiting the STAT3 signaling pathway.
Introduction
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks as the 5th most common cancer and the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide1–3. It is especially prevalent in China4. Radical resection of the whole tumor mass combined with D2 lymph node excision remains the only approach potentially offering chance of cure5–7. Adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy further improves the postoperative overall survival8,9. Over the past decades, although GC incidence and mortality have both declined thanks to remarkable advances in multi-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment modalities, the prognosis of patients with advanced-stage tumors remains very poor10–14. The exploration of more effective agents with fewer adverse events to complement conventional therapy is necessary to improve the outcome of GC patients15–17. The herbal therapeutics deriving from traditional Chinese medicine are promising for GC treatment18,19.
Salvia miltiorrhiza, also called “Danshen” in Chinese, is one of the most commonly-used traditional Chinese medicines. It has been applied clinically to treat hyperlipidemia, hepatic fibrosis, chronic renal failure, gynecological diseases, and ischemic diseases20,21. Recent studies have revealed that Danshen extracts also possess diverse properties (e.g., anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, anti-oxidative, and anticancer activities)22,23. Cryptotanshinone, one of major components extracted from Danshen, has been extensively studied worldwide as a novel antitumor drug24,25. Recently, isocryptotanshinone (ICTS), an analogue of cryptotanshinone, was shown to inhibit the proliferation of lung and breast cancer cells by inducing apoptosis and pro-death autophagy26,27. However, until now, the effect of ICTS on GC is obscure. In the present study, we for the first time revealed that ICTS suppressed the proliferation of human GC cell lines SGC-7901 and MKN-45 via inducing cell cycle arrest at the G1/G0 phase and apoptosis by inhibiting the STAT3 signaling pathway, suggesting ICTS as a potential therapeutic agent against GC.
Results
ICTS inhibited GC cell proliferation
To determine whether ICTS inhibits the proliferation of GC cells, we assessed the growth of SGC-7901 and MKN-45 cells after treatment with ICTS using the CCK-8 assay. The chemical structure of ICTS is shown in Fig. 1A. As shown in Fig. 1B, ICTS inhibited the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells in a dose-dependent manner, and the IC50 was 6.77 μM. As shown in Fig. 1C, after treatment with 10 μM ICTS, the proliferation of SGC-7901 cells was suppressed in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, ICTS induced inhibition of SGC-7901 cell proliferation mainly during the first 24 hours. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 1D and E, MKN-45 cell growth was also inhibited by ICTS in a dose- and time-dependent manner, which was consistent with the results in SGC-7901 cells, with an IC50 of 33.1 μM. Interestingly, the inhibition of SGC-7901 cell proliferation induced by ICTS at lower concentration was more potent compared with that of MKN-45 cells. These results indicated that ICTS suppressed the proliferation of GC cells and might function as a GC suppressor.
ICTS induced GC cell cycle arrest at the G1/G0 phase
Cell proliferation is controlled by the progression of cell cycle. Here, we assessed whether ICTS inhibited cell proliferation via regulating cell cycle. As shown in Fig. 2A, treatment with ICTS for 24 hours arrested SGC-7901 cells in the G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle in a dose-dependent manner, which was consistent with the results shown in Fig. 1B. At a concentration of 10 μM, ICTS markedly increased the proportion of SGC-7901 cells in the G1/G0 phase from 47.9% to 65.7%. Meanwhile, the increase of the SGC-7901 cell proportion in the G1/G0 phase was accompanied with a concomitant decreasing proportion of cells in the S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. Additionally, treatment with 10 μM ICTS increased the SGC-7901 cell number in the sub-G1 phase significantly, which suggested that ICTS might also play an essential role in the regulation of apoptosis. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 2B, ICTS also induced cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase in MKN-45 cells and increased cell proportion in the sub-G1 phase of cell cycle at higher concentration. Together, the data showed that ICTS arrested GC cell cycle in the G1/G0 phase.
ICTS induced GC cell apoptosis
To determine whether the ICTS-mediated growth inhibition in SGC-7901 and MKN-45 cells is associated with apoptosis, the apoptotic cells were further examined by the flow cytometry analysis. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, the percentage of Annexin+/PI+ SGC-7901 cells induced by ICTS after 24 hours was significantly increased from 3.8% to 44.2% in a concentration-dependent manner. The results also indicated that even low concentration of ICTS (e.g., 2.5 and 5 μM) showed apoptosis-inducing effects and the apoptotic cell number was remarkably increased by ICTS at higher concentration (40 μM) after 24 hours. Apoptosis, which is initiated by active caspase-9, induces cleaved-PARP expression and cell death28. As shown in Fig. 3C, the expression of cleaved caspase-9 and PARP were significantly upregulated in SGC-7901 cells after exposed to ICTS for 24 hours. As shown in Fig. 3D and E, ICTS also promoted MKN-45 cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. Additionally, ICTS treatment increased the expression of cleaved caspase-9 and PARP remarkably in MKN-45 cells (Fig. 3F). Thus, these results showed that ICTS induced apoptosis in GC cells.
ICTS regulated expression of cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated proteins in GC cells
To further identify the molecular mechanism of GC cell growth inhibition induced by ICTS, we investigated the expression of cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated protein markers after treatment with ICTS. As shown in Fig. 4A, in SGC-7901 cells, treatment with a concentration of 20 or 40 μM ICTS significantly downregulated the phosphorylation of Rb at Ser-807/811, and the expression of Cyclin D1 and E2F1, which induces the transcription of target genes required for DNA synthesis in the late G1/S phase29. Meanwhile, as shown in Fig. 4B, after treatment with a high concentration of ICTS (20 and 40 μM) for 24 hours, the expression levels of Mcl-1, Bcl-2, and Survivin were also decreased significantly in SGC-7901 cells. The decrement of cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated proteins was consistent with the inhibition of cell proliferation. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 4C and D, the same changes of protein markers induced by ICTS in MKN-45 cells were also observed. These results further confirmed the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by ICTS in the GC cells.
ICTS suppressed phosphorylation of STAT3
As Jak2/STAT3, MAPK, and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways played pivotal roles in the occurrence and development of GC30, we assessed whether ICTS had a regulatory effect on the indicated pathways. As shown in Fig. 5A, ICTS inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 at Tyr-705 in a dose-dependent manner and had weak effect on the total protein. It increased the phosphorylation of Akt at Ser-473 and no significant effects were observed on the phosphorylation of Erk1/2 at Thr-202/Tyr-204. However, ICTS, at a higher concentration, decreased the expression levels of Akt and Erk1/2. Interleukin (IL)−6, a pro-tumorigenic cytokine, is associated with poor survival in GC patients and Helicobacter pylori-induced STAT3 activation at Tyr-70531,32. As shown in Fig. 5B and C, phosphorylation of STAT3 was upregulated remarkably after stimulated by 25 ng/ml IL-6 treatment in SGC-7901 cells, and pre-treatment with ICTS significantly suppressed the IL-6-induced phosphorylation of STAT3. As shown in Fig. 5D, downregulation of STAT3 attenuated the expression of Cyclin D1, p-Rb, and Survivin, which remarkably increased the sensitivity of ICTS in SGC-7901 cells. Overexpression of STAT3 enhanced the growth of the SGC-7901 cells and the expression of Cyclin D1, p-Rb, and Survivin, which restored the cell proliferation and the protein expression suppressed by ICTS (Fig. 5E and F). Together, ICTS inhibited GC cell growth and decreased the expression levels of cell cycle- and apoptosis-associated proteins via inhibiting the STAT3 signaling pathway.
ICTS inhibited xenograft GC growth in nude mice
To determine the effect of ICTS on xenograft tumor growth in vivo, we established the subcutaneous SGC-7901 tumor model. The mice were randomly divided into two groups which received ICTS or vehicle injected intraperitoneally. The results showed a gradual increase in tumor volume in both groups. However, compared with the vehicle group, the tumor volume in the ICTS group increased significantly slower. On the 28th day, the difference of tumor volume between the control and ICTS groups were significant (Fig. 6A and B). Furthermore, phosphorylation of STAT3 in xenograft tumor was identified using immunohistochemistry assay. Results showed that phosphorylation of STAT3 in SGC-7901 tumor was suppressed by ICTS (Fig. 6C). Thus, ICTS inhibited SGC-7901 xenograft tumor growth in vivo.
Discussion
In the present study, we found that ICTS significantly inhibited the proliferation of both undifferentiated (MKN-45) and moderately differentiated (SGC-7901) GC cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner, and slowed the xenograft SGC-7901 tumor growth in mice. Cell proliferation is controlled by the activation of the checkpoints during DNA synthesis and chromosome segregation, which protects cells from the attack by genotoxic agents and leads to the inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and cell cycle arrest33. Three interphase CDKs (CDK2, CDK4, and CDK6), mitotic CDK1, and 4 different classes of cyclins (Cyclin A, Cyclin B, Cyclin D, and Cyclin E) are directly involved in driving the cell cycle and the aberrant expression of the CDK-cyclin complexes resulting from cancer-associated mutations induces unscheduled re-entry into the cell cycle or proliferation34. For instance, Cyclin D1, Cyclin D2, and Cyclin D3 bind and activate CDK4 and CDK6 to phosphorylate the Rb protein, which leads to the subsequent release of E2F1 and the transition from G1 to S phase in the cell cycle35. Our present study showed that ICTS induced cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited the expression of Cyclin D1, pRb, and E2F1 in GC cells in a dose-dependent manner. As an essential protein in the G1-to-S phase transition, E2F1 binds to its dimerization partner 1 or 2 and induces the transcription of the target genes required for DNA synthesis in S phase, such as Cyclin D1, Cyclin E, CDC2, and CDC25A36. Park et al.24 found that cryptotanshinone diminished the E2F1 transcriptional activity compared with the empty vector. Interestingly, this study showed that 2.5 μM ICTS suppressed the expression of E2F1 significantly compared with the 5 μM group after multiple tests. Therefore, the down-regulation of the cell cycle-associated proteins might result from the inhibition of the transcriptional activity of E2F1. Cryptotanshinone-induced cell cycle arrest in the G1/G0 or G2/M phase was dependent on the cell line type, and the effect of ICTS on cell cycle arrest might also be not the same in other cancer cells, which is deserved to be further explored37.
To investigate the effect of ICTS on apoptosis of GC cells, the percentage of apoptotic cells was analyzed using flow cytometry and the anti-apoptotic proteins were detected by the Western blot analysis. The results indicated that ICTS arrested GC cell cycle in the G1/G0 phase and inhibited the expression of Mcl-1, Bcl-2, and Survivin, which was in accordance with the experimental results in A549 and MCF-7 cells26,27. Mcl-1 and Bcl-2, the anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family, regulate programmed cell death via directly inhibiting the pro-apoptotic proteins38. Recent studies showed that cryptotanshinone induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer39, prostate cancer40, chronic myeloid leukemia41, multiple myeloma42, glioma43, and lung cancer44 cells by suppressing the anti-apoptotic proteins. Chen et al.45 found that the cryptotanshinone-induced caspase-dependent cell death inhibited the expression of anti-apoptotic (Bcl-2 and Mcl-1) and survival proteins (Survivin) by activating the Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway in cancer cell lines. The Bcl-2 family proteins were proved to be down-regulated by nature compounds, which were already used in clinical trials46. Small-molecule suppressors of Survivin (e.g., YM155, Tetra-O-methyl nordihy-droguaiaretic acid, and LY2181308) were reported to show anti-cancer activities both in vitro and in vivo, and some of them have been applied in clinical anti-cancer therapy47–51. Our in vivo investigation further suggested that ICTS might be a nature compound which could be potentially applied in clinical GC treatment, and further investigations are warranted in this regard.
The persistent activation of STAT3 was found in multiple human cancers52, and plays a prominent role in mediating drug resistance during chemotherapy and targeted cancer therapies53–55. Researches have shown that activated STAT3 promoted the proliferation and invasion of GC cells in vitro56,57. Additionally, STAT3, as a prognostic marker, was associated with a poor survival in GC58. Serum IL-6 expression was an independent indictor for survival and a high expression level was associated with cancer development and progression in GC32,59. In this study, we demonstrated that ICTS attenuated the phosphorylation of STAT3 stimulated by IL-6 in GC cells, which is consistent with the results in A549 cells26,27. It has been found that the activation of STAT3 elevated the levels of anti-apoptotic (Mcl-1 and Survivin) and cell cycle-regulating proteins (Cyclin D1)60,61. When STAT3 was down-regulated by siRNA transfection, the expression of CylinD1 and Survivin was also significantly decreased (Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, upregulation of STAT3 attenuated the inhibition of Cyclin D1, p-Rb, and Survivin induced by ICTS. Whether ICTS, as a STAT3 suppressor, could obviously enhance the sensitivity of chemotherapy in GC needs further research.
Several issues are noteworthy in this study. Firstly, the efficacy of the investigated compound is relatively low as reflected by the proliferation assay. Nevertheless, based on our data and one publication62, the inhibition potency of ICTS was stronger than cryptotanshinone in SGC-7901 and MKN-45 cells. Different inhibitory effects of ICTS on different gastric cancer cells could be due to their discrepant differentiation potentials and cell types, which would be explained by further related studies. Secondly, after treatment by ICTS at 10 µM, >70% of the growth-inhibited SGC-7901 cells did not undergo apoptosis, indicating that the observed cell death could be largely due to reasons other than apoptosis. We also suggested that cell cycle inhibition would be one of the mechanisms, the others of which warrant further exploration. Notably, p-AKT was increased but total AKT inhibited by ICTS in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A), and the underlying mechanism calls for further explorations.
In conclusion, the present study provided the first evidence that ICTS inhibited GC cell proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through inhibition of the STAT3 signaling.
Materials and Methods
Reagents
ICTS was obtained from ChemFaces, and the purity (98%) was verified using high performance liquid chromatography. Cell Counting kit (CCK)−8 and propidium iodide (PI) were obtained from Beyotime, and FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit was purchased from BD Biosciences. IL-6 was purchased from PeproTech. Primary antibodies used in Western blot were Cyclin D1, phosphorylated Rb (Ser-807/811), E2F1, Mcl-1, Survivin, Bcl-2, p-STAT3 (Tyr705), STAT3, p-Erk1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), Erk1/2, p-Akt (Ser473), Akt (Cell Signaling Technology), β-actin (Bioworld), and Rb (Abconal), and secondary antibodies were anti-rabbit/mouse IgG (ZSGB-Bio).
Cell culture
Human GC cell line SGC-7901 was a kind gift from Dr. Ping Wu (Anhui Medical University), and MKN-45 was purchased from Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences. They were maintained in DMEM (SGC-7901) and RPMI 1640 (MKN-45), respectively, supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2.
Cell proliferation assay
The effect of isocryptotanshinone on cell proliferation was determined by CCK-8 assay. Briefly, cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 2 × 103 cells per well and attached overnight, and they were then treated with isocryptotanshinone of different concentrations or DMSO (Beyotime) as vehicle and incubated for appropriate time. CCK-8 solution was added followed by incubation for 1 to 3 hours at 37 °C and with 5% CO2, and the absorbance per well was measured at 450 nm wavelength using a universal microplate reader (Bio-tek). Results were shown as the relative ratio compared with the control group which was set as 1.
Cell cycle analysis
Cells were seed in 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cell per well and serum-starved overnight. After treated with 10% serum and isocryptotanshinone (0–40 μM) or DMSO for 24 hours, cells were harvested and washed with cold phosphate buffer saline (PBS) twice and then fixed with 70% cold ethanol for 24 hours. Fixed cells were washed again and stained with 500 μL PI solution. After incubation in 37 °C away from light for 30 min. The stained cells were analyzed by FACScan flow cytometry (Becton-Dickinson Biosciences) and CellQuest software. Percentages of cells in sub-G1, G1/G0, S, G2/M phase of cell cycle were determined by using Flow Jo software (v. 7.6.1).
Cell apoptosis detection
Cells were seeded into 6-well plates at a density of 1 × 105 cells per well and allowed to grow overnight. After treated with isocryptotanshinone (2.5–40 μM) or DMSO for 24 hours, cells were harvested and washed twice using cold PBS, and re-suspended in Annexin-binding buffer containing PI and annexin-v in dark at room temperature for 15 minutes. The stained cells were subjected to FACScan flow cytometry (Becton-Dickson Biosciences) using the CellQuest software, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was analyzed using the Flow Jo software.
siRNA/plasmid transfection
The double-strand siRNA was synthesized by Genepharma (Shanghai). The sequence of STAT3-siRNA was as follows: sense, 5′-UGUUCUCUGAGACCCAUGATT-3′; antisense, 5′-UCAUGGGUCUCAGAGAACATT-3′63. The sequence of the negative control was as follows: sense, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; antisense, 5′-ACGUGACACGUUCGGAGAATT-3′. The STAT3 and empty vector plasmids were purchased from Quanayang (Shanghai) and verified with sequencing. SGC-7901 cells were seeded into 6-well plates with a final confluence of 50–60% and allowed to grow overnight. Cells were transfected with siRNAs or plasmids using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After treated with isocryptotanshinone or DMSO for 24 hours, cells were lysed and then analyzed by Western blotting.
Western Blot analysis
After treatment with isocryptotanshinone or DMSO, cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 mM PMSF (Beyotime). The concentration of protein samples was detected using the BCA Protein assay kit (Beyotime). About 30 micrograms of the total protein were separated using 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred to a PVDF membrane. After blocked in TBS-T (20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween) containing 5% non-fat milk for 90 minutes, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then washed with TBS-T, and exposed to HRP-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies at room temperature for 60 minutes. Blots were detected by chemiluminescence using Super Signal West Femo (Thermo Scientific) and bands were captured using a digital imaging system (Tanon).
Animal experiment
Ten 4-week-old male BALB/c nude mice (weight, 20 ± 4 g) were obtained from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. All mice were maintained under specific pathogen free conditions at 22 °C with 55% humidity and a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. 106 SGC-7901 cells were subcutaneously injected into the upper flank region of the nude mice. After 2 weeks, all mice were divided into two (ICTS and control) groups which were intraperitoneally injected with 20 mg/kg ICTS or vehicle every other day for a total of 4 weeks. Tumor sizes of nude mice were measured every 4 days. Tumor volumes (V) were calculated following V = π/6 × a × b2. At the end of the experiments, mice were subsequently sacrificed by cervical dislocation after anesthesia.
Then the SGC-7901 tumors were harvested and fixed in 4% poly-formal-dehyde for 2 days. We detected the phosphorylation of STAT3 in tumors by immunohistochemistry staining as previously described15,64. The primary antibody replaced by PBS was regarded as the negative control and the known positive tissue section staining was considered as the positive control.
Statistical analysis
The quantitative data obtained from at least triplicate wells were presented as mean ± SE. The non-linear regression analysis was performed using the GraphPad Prism software to calculate the IC50. The qualitative differences between 2 groups were analyzed using the Student’s t test. P values of <0.05 and <0.01 were considered statistically significant and very significant, respectively.
Ethics statement
The in vivo part of the current study was performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Anhui Medical University.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Prof. Ping Wu in Anhui Medical University who kindly provided us with SGC-7901 cells in the present study. We also wish to thank Dr. Mei-Juan Zheng for her assistance with flow cytometry. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81572350 to Prof. A-Man Xu). The funder played no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
Z.M.C., L.H., and A.M.X.—designed the study, performed the experiments, conducted the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript; M.M.L. and S.C.Y.—performed the experiments, discussed the results, and reviewed and revised the draft of the paper; L.M. participated in the experiment during revision.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Zhang-Ming Chen, Lei Huang, and Miao-Miao Li contributed equally to this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Lei Huang, Email: huangleizhenting@126.com.
Song-Cheng Ying, Email: yingsc@ahmu.edu.cn.
A-Man Xu, Email: amanxu@163.com.
References
- 1.Global Burden of Disease Cancer, C et al. The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:505–527. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Torre LA, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Huang L, Qi DJ, He W, Xu AM. Omeprazole promotes carcinogenesis of fore-stomach in mice with co-stimulation of nitrosamine. Oncotarget. 2017;8:70332–70344. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen, W. et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 10.3322/caac.21338 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 5.Waddell T, et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology/ESMO. 2013;24(Suppl 6):vi57–63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xu AM, Huang L, Han WX, Wei ZJ. Monitoring of peri-distal gastrectomy carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level in gastric juice and its significance. International journal of clinical and experimental medicine. 2014;7:230–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang L, et al. Detection of perioperative cancer antigen 72-4 in gastric juice pre- and post-distal gastrectomy and its significances. Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) 2013;30:651. doi: 10.1007/s12032-013-0651-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Macdonald JS, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;345:725–730. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xu AM, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for gastric carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014;9:e86941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Power DG, Kelsen DP, Shah MA. Advanced gastric cancer–slow but steady progress. Cancer treatment reviews. 2010;36:384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang L, Wei ZJ, Li TJ, Jiang YM, Xu AM. A prospective appraisal of preoperative body mass index in D2-resected patients with non-metastatic gastric carcinoma and Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: results from a large-scale cohort. Oncotarget. 2017;8:68165–68179. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang JW, Huang L, Xu AM. Preoperative monocyte-lymphocyte and neutrophil-lymphocyte but not platelet-lymphocyte ratios are predictive of clinical outcomes in resected patients with non-metastatic Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: a prospective cohort study (the AMONP corhort) Oncotarget. 2017;8:57516–57527. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huang L, Xu A. Detection of digestive malignancies and post-gastrectomy complications via gastrointestinal fluid examination. Frontiers of medicine. 2017;11:20–31. doi: 10.1007/s11684-016-0493-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huang L, Wu RL, Xu AM. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer. American journal of translational research. 2015;7:2141–2158. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang L, Xu AM, Peng Q. CD147 and MMP-9 expressions in type II/III adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and their clinicopathological significances. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology. 2015;8:1929–1937. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Huang L, Xu AM, Li TJ, Han WX, Xu J. Should peri-gastrectomy gastric acidity be our focus among gastric cancer patients? World journal of gastroenterology. 2014;20:6981–6988. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Xu AM, Huang L, Zhu L, Wei ZJ. Significance of peripheral neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio among gastric cancer patients and construction of a treatment-predictive model: a study based on 1131 cases. American journal of cancer research. 2014;4:189–195. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang, Z. et al. Overcoming chemoresistance in prostate cancer with Chinese medicine Tripterygium wilfordii via multiple mechanisms. Oncotarget, 10.18632/oncotarget.10868 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Jiang Z, et al. The paradigm-shifting idea and its practice: from traditional abortion Chinese medicine Murraya paniculata to safe and effective cancer metastatic chemopreventives. Oncotarget. 2016;7:21699–21712. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yu Y, et al. Comparative effectiveness of Di’ao Xin Xue Kang capsule and Compound Danshen tablet in patients with symptomatic chronic stable angina. Scientific reports. 2014;4:7058. doi: 10.1038/srep07058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guan S, et al. Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza) injection suppresses kidney injury induced by iron overload in mice. PloS one. 2013;8:e74318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu M, et al. In vitro inhibitory effects of ethanol extract of Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza) and its components on the catalytic activity of soluble epoxide hydrolase. Phytomedicine. 2015;22:444–451. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zhou X, et al. Danshensu is the major marker for the antioxidant and vasorelaxation effects of Danshen (Salvia miltiorrhiza) water-extracts produced by different heat water-extractions. Phytomedicine. 2012;19:1263–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2012.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Park IJ, et al. Cryptotanshinone induces G1 cell cycle arrest and autophagic cell death by activating the AMP-activated protein kinase signal pathway in HepG2 hepatoma. Apoptosis: an international journal on programmed cell death. 2014;19:615–628. doi: 10.1007/s10495-013-0929-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tse AK, et al. The herbal compound cryptotanshinone restores sensitivity in cancer cells that are resistant to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288:29923–29933. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.483909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang X, Luo W, Zhao W, Lu J, Chen X. Isocryptotanshinone Induced Apoptosis and Activated MAPK Signaling in Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cells. J Breast Cancer. 2015;18:112–118. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.2.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guo, S. et al. Isocryptotanshinone, a STAT3 inhibitor, induces apoptosis and pro-death autophagy in A549 lung cancer cells. Journal of drug targeting, 1–28, 10.3109/1061186X.2016.1157882 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Li P, et al. Caspase-9: structure, mechanisms and clinical application. Oncotarget. 2017;8:23996–24008. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chen HZ, Tsai SY, Leone G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2009;9:785–797. doi: 10.1038/nrc2696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Riquelme I, et al. Molecular classification of gastric cancer: Towards a pathway-driven targeted therapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6:24750–24779. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Piao JY, et al. Helicobacter pylori Activates IL-6-STAT3 Signaling in Human Gastric Cancer Cells: Potential Roles for Reactive Oxygen Species. Helicobacter. 2016;21:405–416. doi: 10.1111/hel.12298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Liao WC, et al. Serum interleukin-6 level but not genotype predicts survival after resection in stages II and III gastric carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:428–434. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bartek J, Lukas C, Lukas J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2004;5:792–804. doi: 10.1038/nrm1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Malumbres M, Barbacid M. To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2001;1:222–231. doi: 10.1038/35106065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Massague J. G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature. 2004;432:298–306. doi: 10.1038/nature03094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ertosun MG, Hapil FZ, Osman Nidai O. E2F1 transcription factor and its impact on growth factor and cytokine signaling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chen W, Lu Y, Chen G, Huang S. Molecular evidence of cryptotanshinone for treatment and prevention of human cancer. Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry. 2013;13:979–987. doi: 10.2174/18715206113139990115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chipuk JE, Moldoveanu T, Llambi F, Parsons MJ, Green DR. The BCL-2 family reunion. Molecular cell. 2010;37:299–310. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ge Y, Yang B, Chen Z, Cheng R. Cryptotanshinone suppresses the proliferation and induces the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via the STAT3 signaling pathway. Molecular medicine reports. 2015;12:7782–7788. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park IJ, et al. Cryptotanshinone sensitizes DU145 prostate cancer cells to Fas(APO1/CD95)-mediated apoptosis through Bcl-2 and MAPK regulation. Cancer letters. 2010;298:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ge Y, et al. Cryptotanshinone induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis of multidrug resistant human chronic myeloid leukemia cells by inhibiting the activity of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2012;368:17–25. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1338-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu P, et al. Anticancer activity in human multiple myeloma U266 cells: synergy between cryptotanshinone and arsenic trioxide. Metallomics. 2013;5:871–878. doi: 10.1039/c3mt20272k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lu L, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits human glioma cell proliferation by suppressing STAT3 signaling. Molecular and cellular biochemistry. 2013;381:273–282. doi: 10.1007/s11010-013-1711-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chen L, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits lung tumorigenesis and induces apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Molecular medicine reports. 2014;9:2447–2452. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chen W, et al. Cryptotanshinone activates p38/JNK and inhibits Erk1/2 leading to caspase-independent cell death in tumor cells. Cancer prevention research. 2012;5:778–787. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Muller F, Cerella C, Radogna F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Effects of Natural Products on Mcl-1 Expression and Function. Current medicinal chemistry. 2015;22:3447–3461. doi: 10.2174/0929867322666150716115435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nakahara T, et al. YM155, a novel small-molecule survivin suppressant, induces regression of established human hormone-refractory prostate tumor xenografts. Cancer research. 2007;67:8014–8021. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Giaccone G, et al. Multicenter phase II trial of YM155, a small-molecule suppressor of survivin, in patients with advanced, refractory, non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:4481–4486. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Garg H, Suri P, Gupta JC, Talwar GP, Dubey S. Survivin: a unique target for tumor therapy. Cancer cell international. 2016;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0326-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chang CC, Heller JD, Kuo J, Huang RC. Tetra-O-methyl nordihydroguaiaretic acid induces growth arrest and cellular apoptosis by inhibiting Cdc2 and survivin expression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101:13239–13244. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405407101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Talbot DC, et al. Tumor survivin is downregulated by the antisense oligonucleotide LY2181308: a proof-of-concept, first-in-human dose study. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2010;16:6150–6158. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bromberg JF, et al. Stat3 as an oncogene. Cell. 1999;98:295–303. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81959-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tu, B. et al. Mesenchymal stem cells promote osteosarcoma cell survival and drug resistance through activation of STAT3. Oncotarget, 10.18632/oncotarget.10219 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 54.Shi L, et al. Over-expression of CKS1B activates both MEK/ERK and JAK/STAT3 signaling pathways and promotes myeloma cell drug-resistance. Oncotarget. 2010;1:22–33. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lin L, et al. Reelin promotes the adhesion and drug resistance of multiple myeloma cells via integrin beta1 signaling and STAT3. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9844–9858. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jackson CB, et al. Augmented gp130-mediated cytokine signalling accompanies human gastric cancer progression. The Journal of pathology. 2007;213:140–151. doi: 10.1002/path.2218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Dauer DJ, et al. Stat3 regulates genes common to both wound healing and cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24:3397–3408. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kim DY, et al. STAT3 expression in gastric cancer indicates a poor prognosis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. 2009;24:646–651. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2008.05671.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Howlett M, et al. The interleukin-6 family cytokine interleukin-11 regulates homeostatic epithelial cell turnover and promotes gastric tumor development. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:967–977. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Buettner R, Mora LB, Jove R. Activated STAT signaling in human tumors provides novel molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2002;8:945–954. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Banerjee K, Resat H. Constitutive activation of STAT3 in breast cancer cells: A review. International journal of cancer. Journal international du cancer. 2016;138:2570–2578. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wang J, et al. Cryptotanshinone potentiates the antitumor effects of doxorubicin on gastric cancer cells via inhibition of STAT3 activity. J Int Med Res. 2017;45:220–230. doi: 10.1177/0300060516685513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Shin DS, et al. Cryptotanshinone inhibits constitutive signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 function through blocking the dimerization in DU145 prostate cancer cells. Cancer research. 2009;69:193–202. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Song K, Huang L, Han WX, Shen B, Xu AM. Chloride intracellular channel 4 protein promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation, invasion and migration. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2016;9:1770–1775. [Google Scholar]