Abstract
Thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products are rare and their biosynthesis and biological significance remain unknown. Thioplatensimycin (thioPTM) and thioplatencin (thioPTN), thiocarboxylic acid congeners of the antibacterial natural products platensimycin (PTM) and platencin (PTN), were recently discovered. Here we report the biosynthetic origin of the thiocarboxylic acid moiety in thioPTM and thioPTN. We identify a thioacid cassette encoding two proteins, PtmA3 and PtmU4, responsible for carboxylate activation by coenzyme A and sulfur transfer, respectively. ThioPTM and thioPTN bind tightly to β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase II (FabF) and retain strong antibacterial activities. Density functional theory calculations of binding and solvation free energies suggest thioPTM and thioPTN bind to FabF more favorably than PTM and PTN. Additionally, thioacid cassettes are prevalent in the genomes of bacteria, implicating that thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products are underappreciated. These results suggest that thiocarboxylic acid, as an alternative pharmacophore, and thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products may be considered for future drug discovery.
Thioplatensimycin (thioPTM) and thioplatencin (thioPTN) are recently discovered thiocarboxylic acid congeners of the antibacterial compounds PTM and PTN. Here, the authors identify a thioacid cassette encoding PtmA3 and PtmU4 that are responsible for carboxylate activation and sulfur transfer, respectively.
Introduction
Thiocarboxylic acids are an underappreciated pharmacophore in drug discovery and development. In contrast to carboxylic acids, which are one of the most important and biologically active pharmacophores in modern therapeutics1, the significance of thiocarboxylic acids is often overlooked due to their intrinsic instability, difficult preparation, and rare occurrence in nature2–4. In addition, the scarcity of thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products, of which there are only two, thioquinolobactin (TQB)5,6 and pyridine-2,6-dithiocarboxylic acid (PDTC)7, has hindered their biosynthetic and biological studies (Supplementary Fig. 1a).
Thioplatensimycin (thioPTM, 1) and thioplatencin (thioPTN, 2) are newly discovered thiocarboxylic acid-containing congeners of the antibacterial natural products platensimycin (PTM, 3) and platencin (PTN, 4) (Fig. 1a–c)8. PTM and PTN were originally isolated from Streptomyces platensis MA7327 and MA7339, respectively, representing a class of promising natural product antibiotics that target bacterial and mammalian fatty acid synthases9–11. Structurally, they are comprised of two distinct moieties, a diterpene-derived lipophilic ketolide and a 3-amino-2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid (ADHBA, 5), linked by an amide bond (Fig. 1c, d)12,13. We recently developed a dual PTM–PTN overproducing strain, SB12029, through the inactivation of the negative transcriptional regulator ptmR1 in the ptm gene cluster of Streptomyces platensis CB00739 (Fig. 1a, b), which is now used as a model strain for the study of PTM and PTN biosynthesis14,15. When following previously reported procedures for the production of 3 and 4 in SB12029, we discovered that 1 and 2 were also produced in high titers8. Although 1 and 2 were not isolated, we unambiguously established that 1 and 2 possessed thiocarboxylic acid moieties by a combination of high-resolution electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry and chemical transformation8. A sulfur-containing PTM pseudodimer, PTM D1, was also isolated supporting the presence of 1 and 2 in SB120298. The discovery of 1 and 2, and natural congeners thereof (Supplementary Fig. 1b)16,17, questioned whether 3 and 4 were final biosynthetic products of the ptm and ptn biosynthetic gene clusters and set the stage to study thiocarboxylic acid biosynthesis and explore the chemistry and biology of thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products.
Here we report the (i) production of 1 and 2 by both wild-type strains and engineered overproducers known to produce both 3 and 4 or only 4, supporting the legitimacy of the thioacid congeners as natural products; (ii) identification and in vivo and in vitro characterization of a thioacid cassette, which, in combination with the sulfur-carrier protein machinery, is responsible for thiocarboxylic acid biosynthesis; (iii) discovery that the thioacid cassette is broadly distributed in nature; (iv) biological implications of 1 and 2 as antibiotics; and (v) preliminary substrate promiscuity studies of the thioacid cassette, highlighting its potential as a pair of biocatalysts for thiocarboxylic acid synthesis. This work provides clear biochemical evidence supporting that the thioacid cassette, which encodes PtmA3 and PtmU4, is responsible for carboxylate activation by coenzyme A (CoA) and sulfur transfer, respectively, and works together with the sulfur-carrier protein trafficking system for thioPTM and thioPTN biosynthesis. Furthermore, given the subtleties in properties between carboxylic and thiocarboxylic acids and the proven activities of thioPTM and thioPTN, thiocarboxylic acid and thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products in general should now be considered as an alternative pharmacophore in future drug discovery efforts.
Results
ptm and ptn gene clusters producing thioPTM and thioPTN
As 1 and 2 were initially discovered from SB12029, we were curious if the thiocarboxylic acid congeners were simply a result of the overproducing nature of the strain. We selected eight strains, four wild-type strains and four engineered overproducers known to produce both 3 and 4 or only 4. The wild-type strains S. platensis MA73279 and MA733910, S. platensis CB00739, and S. platensis CB00765 (an alternative PTM–PTN dual producer)15, and the overproducing strains SB12001 (MA7327 ΔptmR1)18, SB12600 (MA7339 ΔptmR1)16, SB12026 (CB00739 ΔptmR1)15, and SB12027 (CB00765 ΔptmR1)15 were fermented under conditions known for 1 and 2 production (Supplementary Methods). Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis of all eight strains revealed the production of both 1 and 2 (along with 3 and 4) in the PTM–PTN dual producers or 2 (along with 4) in PTN-exclusive producers (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b). A time-course of SB12029 fermentation revealed that only 1 and 2 were detected on day 1, with increasing amounts of 3 and 4 as the fermentation continued (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d). These findings support that 1 and 2, rather than 3 and 4, might be the bona fide natural products of the PTM and PTN biosynthetic machineries.
Comparison of the ptm and ptn gene clusters (Fig. 1a, b)15,19 with gene clusters known for biosynthesis of the thiocarboxylic acid- or thioester-containing natural products TQB (qbs)5,6, PDTC (pdt)7, and yatakemycin (YTK, ytk)20 revealed two conserved genes encoding an acyl-CoA synthetase [PtmA3, ∼30% protein sequence identity with QbsL (32%), OrfJ (28%, from pdt), and YtkG (32%)] and a type III CoA-transferase [PtmU4, ∼36% identity with QbsK (37%), OrfI (36%, from pdt), and YtkF (35%)]. We individually inactivated ptmA3 and ptmU4 in the PTM–PTN dual overproducer SB12029 (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Supplementary Data 1, and Supplementary Figs. 3–6). The resultant mutants SB12039 (ΔptmA3) and SB12040 (ΔptmU4) lost their ability to produce 1 and 2 but still produced 3 and 4 (Fig. 1e). The production of 3 and 4 in SB12039 and SB12040 implies that (i) 3 and 4 are directly converted into 1 and 2, respectively, or (ii) 5 is converted into 5-SH prior to its coupling with the ketolides (Fig. 2a, b)19,21. To verify the timing of thiocarboxylic acid formation in the biosynthesis of 3 and 4, we introduced ptmB1, ptmB2, and ptmB3, which encodes the biosynthesis of 5 (Fig. 2a)21, together with ptmA3 and ptmU4 into four model Streptomyces hosts to afford S. albus SB12303, S. lividans SB12304, S. coelicolor SB12305, and S. avermitilis SB12306 (Supplementary Fig. 7). LC-MS analysis revealed that, while SB12303–SB12305 did not produce either 5 or 5-SH, SB12306 produced both 5 and 5-SH (Fig. 1f). Production of 5-SH in the heterologous host S. avermitilis confirms that PtmA3 and PtmU4 are required for thiocarboxylic acid biosynthesis, while the sulfur donor for thiocarboxylic acid formation is conserved between S. platensis and S. avermitilis (Supplementary Table 3), and likely among all Streptomyces species.
Utilizing sulfur-carrier proteins as the sulfur donor
Thiocarboxylic acids at the C-termini of small sulfur-carrier proteins are utilized as direct sulfur donors for the biosynthesis of essential cofactors including thiamine and molybdenum cofactor in nearly all bacteria species22,23. The biosynthesis of this protein thiocarboxylate species is well-established and occurs via nucleophilic attack of a protein-tethered persulfide on an adenylated carboxylate of a C-terminal glycine (G)22,23. Given that 5-SH was readily produced in S. avermitilis, and the fact that the tqb and pdt gene clusters possess their own cognate members of the sulfur-carrier protein system5–7, we suspected that the native sulfur donor for 1 and 2 is from similar primary metabolism machinery. Since no homologs are present in the ptm gene cluster, we searched the genome of CB00739 for potential candidates. Four sulfur-carrier proteins (PtmS2, PtmS3, SpSCP1, and SpSCP2), one MoaZ homolog (PtmS4), and one JAMM family metalloprotease (PtmS1) were encoded within the genome (Supplementary Fig. 8). Both PtmS2 and PtmS3 have capped C-termini with either two residues (MV) or a single residue (C) following the GG motif, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 9); SpSCP1 and SpSCP2 have exposed C-terminal GG sequences. Typically, sulfur-carrier proteins with capped C-termini require a protease, as exemplified by QbsD in TQB biosynthesis and whose biochemical function was previously reported, to expose the C-terminal GG sequence for subsequent activation and sulfur transfer24. Since the protease-encoding ptmS1 was found clustered with the capped sulfur-carrier protein-encoding ptmS2 in CB00739 (Supplementary Fig. 8), we hypothesized that PtmS2 may be utilized for the biosynthesis of 1 and 2. Similar two-gene cassettes were found in the tqb and pdt gene clusters5–7, as well as in the genome of S. avermitilis (Supplementary Table 3).
We individually inactivated ptmS1, ptmS2, and ptmS4 in SB12029, yielding mutants SB12041 (ΔptmS1), SB12042 (ΔptmS2), and SB12043 (ΔptmS4), respectively (Supplementary Figs. 10–15). Similar to SB12039 and SB12040, both SB12041 and SB12043 lost their ability to produce 1 and 2 but still produced 3 and 4 (Fig. 1e). In contrast, SB12042 retained its ability to produce 1 and 2 (Fig. 1e), indicating that PtmS2 may be functionally redundant (e.g., complemented by PtmS3)25. The inability of SB12041 and SB12043 to produce 1 and 2 corroborates the use of capped sulfur-carrier proteins (i.e., PtmS2 and PtmS3), as opposed to proteins with pre-exposed GG motifs (i.e., SpSCP1 and SpSCP2), by the PTM and PTN biosynthetic machineries.
Reconstituting thiocarboxylic acid biosynthesis in vitro
Upon incubation of 5, ATP, and CoA in the presence of PtmA3 (Supplementary Fig. 16a, c), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of the reaction mixture revealed the disappearance of 5 and concomitant production of S-(3-amino-2,4-dihydroxybenzoate) coenzyme A (ADHBCoA, 5-CoA, Fig. 2a, c and Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18). Substitution of 5 with 3 or 4 under the same assay conditions failed to afford any new products, confirming that 3 and 4 are not the precursors of 1 and 2, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 19). Steady-state kinetics of PtmA3, using 5 or 3-amino-4-hydroxybenzoic acid (AHBA, 6, Fig. 2a, c, Supplementary Figs. 20a, b, 21, and 22), revealed 12-fold higher catalytic efficiency (kcat Km−1) for 5 over 6 (Table 1), supporting 5 as the native substrate of PtmA3. When 5-CoA, ATP, and either PtmS2GG or PtmS3GG [the C-terminal caps were removed during cloning24 as the native sulfur donor, supplemented with sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3)23,25, were incubated with PtmS4 and PtmU4 (Supplementary Fig. 16a–c), LC-MS analysis of the assay mixture revealed the appearance of free CoA and 5-SH (Fig. 2d). Replacement of the native sulfur donor with potassium hydrosulfide (KSH) as a sulfur donor surrogate26 led to increased 5-SH formation (Supplementary Fig. 23a), isolation of which allowed unambiguous structural characterization by 1H and 13C NMR (Supplementary Figs. 24 and 25).
Table 1.
Substrate | Km (μM) | Ki (μM) | Kcat (min−1) | rel Kcat Km−1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 22.9 ± 3.0 | 184 ± 24 | 14.1 ± 0.9 | 1 |
6 | 470 ± 60 | 638 ± 89 | 23.8 ± 2.2 | 0.082 |
7 | (1.24 ± 0.11)×103 | n.a. | 6.89 ± 0.3 | 0.009 |
8 | 70.9 ± 5.0 | n.a. | 1.03 ± 0.02 | 0.024 |
9 | 290 ± 21 | n.a. | 1.39 ± 0.03 | 0.008 |
10 | 322 ± 15 | n.a. | 15.8 ± 0.3 | 0.079 |
All experiments were performed in triplicate and the data are listed with standard deviations The relative rates are compared to the native substrate 5. n.a. not applicable
PtmU4 catalyzing sulfur transfer
PtmU4 was bioinformatically predicted to possess two type III CoA-transferase domains. CoA-transferases, which typically perform reversible CoA transfer reactions from CoA-thioester donors to various organic acid CoA acceptors are classified into three subgroups (types I–III) based on differences in their protein sequences and reaction mechanisms (Supplementary Fig. 26)27. Canonical type III CoA-transferases are proposed to utilize a conserved Asp residue to form mixed anhydride and covalent thioester intermediates with the CoA donor and CoA moiety, respectively; the liberated donor free acid is not released prior to binding the CoA acceptor (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 26a and 27)27,28. Type III CoA-transferases can be further separated into one-domain and two-domain proteins. Members of the two-domain family have tandem CoA-transferase domains, which have highest homology at the N-termini of the individual domains, separated by a poorly conserved linker29. DddD, the only characterized two-domain type III CoA-transferase, dually functions as a CoA-transferase and a lyase mediating the first two steps of dimethyl sulfide release from dimethylsulfoniopropionate (Supplementary Fig. 26c)30. Phylogenetic analysis of selected one- and two-domain type III CoA-transferases from bacteria revealed that PtmU4/PtnU4 clades with other two-domain type III CoA-transferases and separated from all one-domain type III CoA-transferases and DddD (Fig. 3b)29. DddD forms an outgroup from both the one-domain and two-domain type III CoA-transferases.
Sequence alignment of PtmU4 and its homologs revealed that they indeed possess a conserved Asp at the C-terminal CoA transferase domain (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 27). To determine if PtmU4 requires this conserved Asp for thiocarboxylic acid formation, Asp430 was mutated to Ala, Glu, or Asn by site-directed mutagenesis (Supplementary Fig. 16d). Circular dichroism indicated that the structures of these mutants were not significantly perturbed relative to native PtmU4 (Supplementary Fig. 16e and Supplementary Methods). The activities of each mutant were dramatically reduced (125–400-fold), supporting Asp430 as a key residue in PtmU4 catalysis (Supplementary Fig. 23b). Although trace amounts of 5-SH were identified in the negative control reaction without a native sulfur donor (Fig. 2d), the ~3-fold rate enhancement of sulfur transfer by PtmU4 using either PtmS2GG or PtmS3GG (Fig. 2d), along with the near loss of activity in the Asp430 mutants, confirms genuine enzyme catalysis.
Thiocarboxylic acids as a potential pharmacophore
If 1 and 2 are the bona fide final metabolites of the PTM and PTN biosynthetic machineries, it is fascinating that 3 and 4, non-enzymatic hydrolyzed metabolites of the PTM and PTN pathway (Fig. 2a, b), possess such exquisite biological activity. We isolated and spectroscopically characterized 1 and 2 (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5 and Supplementary Figs. 28–37), and tested their antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 and Kocuria rhizophila (previously Micrococcus luteus) ATCC 9431 (Supplementary Methods)31. Both 1 and 2 retained strong antibacterial activities with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranging from 1 to 4 μg mL−1 (2–8-fold higher than those of 3 and 4, Table 2 and Supplementary Fig. 38a). As the ADHBA moiety of 3 and 4 makes key interactions with the target proteins FabF and FabH9,10, the ADHBSH moieties of 1 and 2 likely bind in a similar manner. Binding assays, using the Escherichia coli FabF C163Q mutant, which mimics the acyl-enzyme intermediate9, revealed that the dissociation constants (KD) for 1 and 2 were ~2-fold tighter than those of 3 and 4 (Table 2 and Supplementary Figs. 38b and 39). Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on the ADHBA moiety of 3 and 4 and the ADHBSH moiety of 1 and 2 with two interacting residues, H303 and H340, in the E. coli FabF C163Q mutant (PDB 2GFX, Supplementary Data 3)9. The carboxylate of 5 forms stronger hydrogen bonds (ΔG = –12.0 kcal mol−1) with the imidazoles of the His residues than the thiocarboxylate of 5-SH (two conformations, each ΔG ≈ –9.6 kcal mol−1, Fig. 4a). In a three-residue model (H303, H340, Q163), the geometry of the 5-SH-b conformation is favored over 5-SH-a by 3.5 kcal mol−1; consistent with the two His model, ADHBA binding is favored over ADHBSH (5-SH-b) by 2.5 kcal mol−1 (Fig. 4b). Calculation of solvation free energies of 5 (–58.2 kcal mol−1) and 5-SH (–55.1 kcal mol−1) revealed that 5-SH is less well-solvated in water (Fig. 4c). Therefore, although 5 forms a more stable complex, 5-SH exhibits a higher activity (favored binding) due to a net energy difference32 of 0.6 kcal mol−1.
Table 2.
MIC (μg mL−1) | Binding assay with E. coli FabF C163Q | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. aureus | K. rhizophila | ka (M−1 s−1) | kd (s−1) | KD (M) | |
thioPTM (1) | 4 | 1 | (3.0 ± 0.1)×105 | (1.3 ± 0.1)×10−3 | (4.4 ± 0.3)×10−9 |
thioPTN (2) | 1 | 0.5 | (2.3 ± 1.2)×105 | (6.9 ± 1.7)×10−3 | (3.3 ± 0.9)×10−8 |
PTM (3) | 0.5 | 1 | (5.8 ± 0.9)×105 | (5.1 ± 0.9)×10−3 | (8.8 ± 1.4)×10−9 |
PTN (4) | 0.25 | 0.25 | (6.2 ± 2.2)×105 | (4.5 ± 2.6)×10−2 | (7.0 ± 1.7)×10−8 |
Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in triplicate using the broth dilution method. Binding assays are reported as means with standard deviations of at least two replicates
Biocatalysts for thiocarboxylic acid synthesis
We first examined the promiscuity of PtmA3 and PtmU4 using a series of aryl acids with KSH as the sulfur donor. Both PtmA3 and PtmU4 showed broad substrate promiscuity by efficiently catalyzing the CoA activation and thiolation, respectively, to afford the corresponding aryl thiocarboxylic acids (Tables 1 and 3, Fig. 5a, and Supplementary Figs. 20c–f and 40–48). When catalysis is coupled, PtmA3 and PtmU4 convert carboxylic acids into thiocarboxylic acids in the presence of a catalytic amount of CoA (Fig. 5b, c). This biocatalytic platform provides a practical solution for thiocarboxylic acid synthesis of small molecules with future opportunities to expand the substrate scope through enzyme engineering.
Table 3.
Substrate | Rate (s−1) | Relative rate (%) |
---|---|---|
5-CoA | (2.43 ± 0.07)×10−3 | 100 ± 3 |
6-CoA | (2.46 ± 0.02)×10−3 | 101 ± 1 |
7-CoA | (5.82 ± 0.08)×10−3 | 240 ± 3 |
8-CoA | (1.50 ± 0.2)×10−4 | 6 ± 1 |
9-CoA | (5.23 ± 0.2)×10−4 | 22 ± 1 |
10-CoA | (2.44 ± 0.1)×10−3 | 100 ± 6 |
All experiments were performed in triplicate and the data are listed with standard deviations. The relative rates are compared to the native substrate 5-CoA. S-(3-amino-4-chlorobenzoate) coenzyme A (7-CoA); S-(2-amino-3-hydroxy benzoate) coenzyme A (8-CoA); S-(2-amino-4-fluorobenzoate) coenzyme A (9-CoA); S-(6-hydroxy-2-naphthalenecarboxylate) coenzyme A (10-CoA)
Discussion
Since the discovery of PTM and PTN as promising antibiotics over a decade ago, these natural products have garnered considerable attention. Significant progress in understanding the biosynthetic pathways of 3 and 4 has been made through the use of microbial genomics11. Given the amount of time and resources spent on studying 3 and 4, we were initially surprised to identify sulfur-containing congeners of PTM and PTN8,17. The discovery of the thiocarboxylic acid-containing 1 and 2 raised a provocative question: which natural products are the true biosynthetic end products of the ptm and ptn biosynthetic gene clusters? The current study clearly demonstrates that (i) 1 and 2 are produced by several wild-type and engineered strains of S. platensis; the four wild-type strains were isolated from three different continents (Africa, Europe, and Asia)9,10,15, (ii) 1 and 2 is produced prior to the detection of 3 and 4, and in certain conditions, 3 and 4 are non-enzymatic hydrolysis products of 1 and 2, (iii) the biosynthesis of the thiocarboxylic acid moieties in 1 and 2 is genetically encoded by at least four genes, two of which are located inside the ptm gene cluster, and (iv) PtmA3 and PtmU4 convert 5 into 5-SH in vitro and within the context of the native sulfur donors. While our data supports that 1 and 2, rather than 3 and 4, are the bona fide biosynthetic end products of the PTM and PTN biosynthetic machineries, we could not rule out if 3 and 4 are the legitimate natural products that would be produced in its native environment (i.e., the complex environment of soil).
The identification and characterization of the thioacid cassette and its functional integration in the biosynthesis of 1 and 2, along with its presence in the biosynthetic gene clusters of the thiocarboxylic acid- or ester-containing natural products PDTC, TQB, and YTK, led us to examine the prevalence of the thioacid cassette in bacterial genomes. A database search (as of September 5, 2017) of putative thioacid cassettes in bacteria produced 2,401 PtmU4 homologs (i.e., two-domain type III CoA-transferases), most of which are from Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria (Supplementary Fig. 49). In a sequence similarity network33 of PtmU4 homologs, a thioacid group, including PtmU4 from various PTM and PTN producers and the homologs involved in the biosynthesis of PDTC, TQB, and YTK, was found at an e-value threshold of 10–80 (Fig. 3c). In contrast to the relatively conserved PtmU4 homologs from Proteobacteria, the homologs from Actinobacteria have more sequence diversity, forming 28 different clusters (Fig. 3c). Among the 175 sequences in the thioacid group, 160 ( > 90%) were encoded in genetic proximity ( ≤ 2 genes) to homologs of PtmA3 (Supplementary Data 2 and Supplementary Fig. 50), confirming the broad distribution of the thioacid cassette in nature. Although it is possible that these cassettes are nonfunctional genetic remnants of evolution, the observable functional integration of the thioacid cassettes in thioPTM, thioPTN, PDTC, TQB, and YTK biosynthesis lead us to speculate that thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products, or their derivatives thereof, are vastly underrepresented among known natural products.
The isolation of 1 and 2 gave us an opportunity to assess the biological implications of thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products. PTM and PTN inhibit the decarboxylating condensing enzymes FabF and FabH in bacterial type II fatty acid synthesis (FASII)9,10. The carboxylic acid moiety of 3 and 4 mimics the malonyl-acyl carrier protein substrate and ionically interacts with two His residues in the Cys-His-His catalytic triad, resulting in competitive inhibition9–11. Structure–activity relationship studies of 3 and 4 have concluded that modification of their ADHBA moieties results in loss of antibiotic activity11,21,34. The thiocarboxylic acid congeners 1 and 2, whose structures only differ from 3 and 4 at one atom, retained strong antibacterial activities and were found to bind slightly tighter to FabF. Our DFT calculations were congruent with 1 and 2 being better binders of FabF than 3 and 4 while exhibiting minimal differences in their observed MICs. Similarly, TQB and PDTC, which are bacterial siderophores, have improved activities compared to their carboxylic acid congeners6,7. It is still unclear if and why S. platensis produces 1 and 2 in nature, but the biosynthetic role of the thioacid cassette and its prevalence in bacterial genomes would suggest that thiocarboxylic acid-containing natural products might have important and unsolved biological roles in nature. In conclusion, thiocarboxylic acids, which have been an underappreciated pharmacophore in drug discovery and development, should now be considered in future studies.
Methods
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and chemicals
Strains, plasmids, and PCR primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Information. PCR primers were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Q5 high-fidelity DNA polymerase, restriction endonucleases, and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from NEB and used by following the protocols provided by the manufacturers. DNA gel extraction and plasmid preparation kits were purchased from Omega Bio-Tek. DNA sequencing was conducted by Eton Bioscience. The REDIRECT Technology kit for PCR-targeting homologous recombination was provided by The John Innes Center (Norwich, UK)35. pOJ260 was used as a shuttle vector for gene homologous recombination36. E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 was used as the host for intergeneric conjugations37. pUWL201PWT, which is a derivative of pUWL201PW38 containing an oriT sequence that was cloned into its PstI site, was used as the shuttle vector for gene complementations, biotransformation, and heterologous production of PtmU4 in Streptomyces. Cosmid libraries were screened by PCR using OneTaq 2× Master Mix with GC buffer (NEB). For Southern analysis, digoxigenin labeling of DNA probes, hybridization, and detection were performed according to the protocols provided by the manufacturer (Roche Diagnostics Corp.). S. platensis CB0073915, CB0076515, MA73279, and MA733910, and their pathway-specific negative regulator ptmR1 inactivation mutants, SB1202615, SB1202914, SB1202715, SB1200118, and SB1260016 were reported previously. S. albus J107439, S. lividans K4-11440, S. avermitilis SUKA2241, and S. coelicolor M114642 were used as model Streptomyces hosts for small-molecule biotransformation and protein production. Other common chemicals, biochemical, and media components were purchased from standard commercial sources.
In-frame deletion of ptmA3 in SB12029 to afford SB12039
To construct the plasmid for in-frame deletion of ptmA3, two 3-kb fragments of the genes upstream and downstream of ptmA3 were amplified from cosmid pBS12037, a cosmid containing a partial ptm gene cluster15, with the primers 739A3up_F, 739A3up_R, 739A3down_F, and 739A3down_R. Both fragments were cloned into the HindIII and EcoRI sites of pOJ260 to obtain pBS12075. pBS12075 was transformed into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 and introduced into S. platensis SB12029 by intergeneric conjugation35. After several rounds of passaging the exconjugants, double crossovers via homologous recombination were selected by the apramycin-sensitive phenotype. The genotype of the in-frame deletion mutant SB12039 was verified by PCR analysis and Southern analysis.
Inactivation of ptmU4 in SB12029 to afford SB12040
The ptmU4 gene was replaced with the aac(3)IV+oriT resistance cassette from pIJ773 using λRED-mediated PCR-targeting mutagenesis35 in E. coli BW25113/pIJ790 harboring pBS12037, a cosmid containing a partial ptm gene cluster15. The genotype of the resultant ΔptmU4 mutant cosmid, pBS12074, was confirmed by PCR analysis using primers 739U4ID_F and 739U4ID_R. pBS12074 was transformed into the nonmethylating E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 and introduced into S. platensis SB12029 by intergeneric conjugation. Single crossovers of ΔptmR1/ΔptmU4 were selected by screening for apramycin resistance on ISP4 medium. After another round of passaging the single-crossover exconjugants in solid ISP4 medium, the ΔptmR1/ΔptmU4 mutant SB12040, a result of double-crossover homologous recombination, was selected for by screening for an apramycin-resistant and kanamycin-sensitive phenotype. The genotype of SB12040 was confirmed by PCR and Southern analysis.
Inactivation of ptmS1, ptmS2, and ptmS4 and disruption of ptmS3 was performed using the protocol described above for the ΔptmR1/ΔptmU4 mutant SB12040. Each genotype was verified by PCR analysis and Southern analysis.
Heterologous production of 5-SH in model Streptomyces hosts
pUWL201PWT was used as an E. coli–Streptomyces expression shuttle vector to construct a 5-SH production system in model Streptomyces hosts. The candidate thioacid cassette genes, ptmA3 and ptmU4, were amplified by PCR using the primers 739U4pUW_F and 739U4pUW_R, and 739A3pUW_F and 739A3pUW_R from pBS12037 and individually cloned into pET-44b(+). ptmU4 was cloned into the NdeI and PstI sites and ptmA3, placed downstream of ptmU4, was cloned into the PstI and HindIII sites to yield pBS12084. The constructed fragment of ptmU4–ptmA3 was cut from pBS12084 at the NdeI and HindIII sites and cloned into pUWL201PWT at the same sites to construct pBS12085.
The three ADHBA biosynthetic genes, ptmB1, ptmB2, and ptmB3, were amplified as a single fragment by PCR using the primers 739B1B3pUW_F and 739B1B3pUW_R from pBS12037, which was subsequently cloned into the HindIII and EcoRI sites of pBS12085. The resulting construct, pBS12086, possessed ptmU4-ptmA3-ptmB1-ptmB2-ptmB3 (Supplementary Figure 7). pBS12086 was transformed into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 and introduced into four Streptomyces model strains (S. albus J1074, S. lividans K4-114, S. avermitilis SUKA22, and S. coelicolor M1146) by intergeneric conjugation. Clones containing pBS12086 were selected with thiostrepton.
PTM fermentation medium, supplemented with thiostrepton, was used for the production of 5-SH in the model Streptomyces hosts. After fermentation for 2 days at 28 °C, the fermentation broth was directly used for LC-MS analysis.
Gene cloning
The ptmA3, ptmU4, ptmS2GG, ptmS3GG, and ptmS4 genes from S. platensis CB00739 were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA with Q5 DNA polymerase (NEB). The PCR product was purified, treated with T4 polymerase, and cloned into pBS308043 according to ligation-independent procedures to afford pBS12087 (harboring ptmA3), pBS12088 (harboring ptmU4), pBS12089 (harboring ptmS4), pBS12090 (harboring ptmS2GG, amino acid residues 1–90), and pBS12091 (harboring ptmS3GG, amino acid residues 1–91). The E. coli fabF gene containing a site-directed mutation resulting in FabF C163Q was cloned into pBS308043 as described above, resulting in pBS12096. pUWL201PWT was used as an E. coli–Streptomyces expression shuttle vector and protein expression of PtmU4 in Streptomyces. The full-length ptmU4 gene together with an N-terminal His6-tag sequence was amplified by PCR from pBS12088 using the 739StrU4_F and 739StrU4_R primers. Thus, ptmU4 was cloned into the NdeI and HindIII sites of pUWL201PWT affording pBS12092. For site-directed mutagenesis of ptmU4, the ptmU4 gene from pBS12092 was amplified in two steps by primer extension44 using the 739StrU4_F and 739Stru4_R primers with internal primers containing the desired mutation. The mutant ptmU4 genes were then cloned into pUWL201PWT as described above yielding pBS12093–pBS12095.
Gene expression and protein production and purification
PtmA3, PtmS2GG, PtmS3GG, and PtmS4 were produced in E. coli. For enzyme activity assays, the plasmid harboring each gene was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) (Life Technologies) and grown in 1 L of lysogeny broth (LB) at 37 °C with shaking at 250 rpm until an OD600 of 0.6 was reached. The culture was cooled to 4 °C, gene expression was induced with the addition of 0.25 mM isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside, and the cells were grown around 18 h at 18 °C with shaking. After harvesting the cells by centrifugation at 4000 g for 15 min at 4 °C, the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole), lysed by sonication, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was purified by nickel-affinity chromatography using an ÄKTAxpress system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) equipped with a HisTrap column. The resultant protein with an N-terminal His6-tag was desalted using a HiPrep desalting column (GE Healthcare Biosciences) and concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 concentrator (Millipore) in 50 mM Tris, pH 7.8, containing 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM KCl, and 5% glycerol. Protein concentrations were determined from the absorbance at 280 nm using a molar absorptivity constant of each protein. Individual aliquots of each protein were stored at –80 °C until use.
PtmU4 was produced in S. avermitilis SUKA22 for enzyme activity assays. pBS12092 was transformed into E. coli ET12567/pUZ8002 and introduced into S. avermitilis SUKA22 by intergeneric conjugation. Positive colonies were selected using thiostrepton and named S. avermitilis SB12307. Fresh spores of SB12307 were inoculated into TSB seed medium supplemented with thiostrepton and cultured for 2 days. Three liters of TSB medium was inoculated with 5% (v/v) seed culture supplemented with thiostrepton and incubated at 28 °C and 250 rpm for 2 days. After harvesting the cells by centrifugation at 3750 g for 30 min at 4 °C, the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and 10 mM imidazole) and 1 mg mL−1 lysozyme and 1.5 tablets of Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche) were added. After incubation on ice for 2 h, the pellet was lysed by sonication, and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The supernatant containing PtmU4 was purified in three steps using an ÄKTA FPLC system (GE Healthcare Biosciences): (a) nickel-affinity chromatography equipped with a HisTrap HP, 5 mL column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), which was first washed with 300 mL Wash buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole) and then eluted with 100 mL 50% Elution buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 100 mM NaCl and 500 mM imidazole); (b) anion exchange chromatography equipped with a HiTrap Q HP, 5 mL column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) using a gradient increasing the concentration of sodium chloride from 0 to 1 M in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0; (c) size-exclusion chromatography equipped with a Superdex 200 16/600 column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) using a buffer of 50 mM Tris, pH 7.8, containing 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM KCl, and 5% glycerol. The resultant protein with an N-terminal His6-tag was concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 concentrator (Millipore). Protein concentrations were determined from the absorbance at 280 nm using a molar absorptivity constant (ε280 = 103,280 M−1 cm−1). Individual aliquots of PtmU4 were stored at –80 °C until use. Each of the PtmU4 site-directed mutants was produced and purified as described above.
Enzymatic activity of PtmA3
Preliminary incubations were performed in 50 mM phosphate, pH 7.6, containing 1 mM ATP, 1 mM CoA, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM 5, and 2 μM PtmA3 in a total volume of 50 μL. After incubation at 30 °C for 10 min, 50 μL of CH3OH were added to quench the reaction. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged and 2 μL of the supernatant were injected and analyzed by LC-MS. Substrate and product were detected by monitoring 260 nm with a photodiode array detector. The reactions conditions for PtmA3 were optimized by monitoring 5-CoA production using the HPLC method with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min−1 and a 6 min solvent gradient from 2.5–20% CH3CN in 10 mM ammonium acetate. Buffers (Tris and phosphate) and different concentrations of ATP, CoA, and MgCl2 were all tested for improved PtmA3 activity. The optimized reaction conditions were determined to be 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing 2.5 mM ATP, 2.5 mM CoA, and 5 mM MgCl2, and used for the kinetic studies of PtmA3.
Kinetic studies of PtmA3
All kinetics assays were performed in the optimized reaction conditions with varying concentration of aryl acids (5–10) in a total volume of 50 μL. Each reaction was incubated at 30 °C for 10 min and boiled 1 min to quench the reaction. After centrifugation, the reaction mixtures were analyzed by HPLC as described above, but using different solvent gradients (5 and 8, 2.5–20% CH3CN in 8 min; 6, 7, 9, and 10, 2.5–30% CH3CN in 8 min) and the integrated area under curve (AUC) at 260 nm was calculated. A standard curve of 5-CoA–10-CoA was used to convert AUC into the amount of product formed. Each kinetic assay was performed in triplicate.
Enzymatic activity of PtmU4
The reaction was first incubated in 50 mM phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 500 μM ATP, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM Na2S2O3, 100 μM PtmS2GG or 100 μM PtmS3GG and 40 μM PtmS4 at 30 °C for 30 min. Then, 100 μM 5-CoA and 5 μM PtmU4 was added in a total volume of 50 μL. After incubation at 30 °C for another 30 min, the reaction was quenched by boiling for 1 min. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged and 20 μL of the supernatant were injected and analyzed by HPLC. Each sample was run on an Agilent 1260 HPLC system equipped with an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (50 mm×4.6 mm, 2.7 μm) using a 6 min solvent gradient (0.8 mL min−1) of 2.5–20% CH3CN in 10 mM ammonium acetate. Substrate and product were detected by monitoring 260 nm with a photodiode array detector.
When potassium hydrosulfide (KSH) was used to replace the native sulfur donor (sulfur-carrier protein), the reaction was performed in 50 mM phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 5 mM KSH, 200 μM 5-CoA, and 5 μM PtmU4 in a total volume of 50 μL. After incubation at 30 °C for 10 min, the reaction was quenched by boiling for 1 min. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged and 10 μL of the supernatant were injected and analyzed by HPLC as described above. The relative activities of all PtmU4 mutants were determined using a 5-CoA concentration of 500 μM. Due to slower turnovers of all mutants, enzyme concentration and incubation time were increased to 10 μM and 1 h, respectively, to facilitate product detection. The reaction mixture was then centrifuged and 10 μL of the supernatant were injected and analyzed by HPLC as described above. Substrate promiscuity assays of PtmU4 were determined using 500 μM of different CoA substrates and 0.5 μM PtmU4. The aryl thioacid peaks were collected and analyzed by LC-MS using either positive or negative mode (Supplementary Fig. 48).
The one-pot reaction to synthesize 5-SH from 5 using a combination of PtmA3 and PtmU4 was performed using 5 (100 μM), CoA (50 μM), ATP (1 mM), Mg2+ (4 mM), KSH (2 mM), PtmA3 (10 μM), and PtmU4 (5 μM) in phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) at 30 °C.
Antibiotic binding using surface plasmon resonance
Experiments were performed on a Biacore X100 (GE Healthcare) instrument at 25 °C and data were analyzed using Biacore X100 evaluation software. HBS-P+buffer (0.1 M HEPES, 1.5 M NaCl, 0.5% v/v surfactant P20, pH 7.4) containing 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the running buffer. Cells 1 and 2 were used as the reference and experimental surface, respectively. FabF C163Q was diluted to 0.15 μM in HBS-P+buffer containing 0.1% DMSO and immobilized on an NTA sensor chip (GE Healthcare) at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1. For kinetic analysis, antibiotics (1–4) were prepared by two-fold serial dilutions with HBS-P+buffer containing 0.1% DMSO (0.078–10 μM) and injected over both surfaces at a flow rate of 30 μL min−1. A 120-s association phase was followed by a 350-s dissociation phase. Signals from the reference surface and buffer blank injections were subtracted and the corrected results were globally fit to a 1:1 binding model. The association rate constant (ka) and dissocation rate constant (kd) were used to determine the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) in units of M.
Computational details
The crystal structure of the E. coli FabF C163Q–PTM complex9 (PDB 2GFX) was used to extract the ADHBA moiety of PTM and the side chains of H303 and H340, or H303, H340, and Q163. For calculations with ADHBSH, one oxygen in the carboxylic acid group of ADHBA was replaced with a sulfur atom. Quantum mechanical DFT calculations were performed using Gaussian 0945. Each of the geometry optimizations were performed at the M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory with the SMD implicit solvation model to account for the solvation effects of water and the interior of protein (ε = 4).
Data availability
Proteins from S. platensis CB00739 have been deposited to protein database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), under accession code AIW55578 for PtmA3, AIW55577 for PtmU4, AVR47602 for PtmS1, AVR47603 for PtmS2, AVR47604 for PtmS3, AVR47605 for PtmS4, AVR47606 for SpSCP1, and AVR47607 for SpSCP2. All other relevant data that support the findings of this study are available in the manuscript and the Supplementary Information.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by the Chinese Ministry of Education 111 Project B0803420 (to Y. Duan,) and National Institutes of Health Grants GM114353 (to B.S.). We thank Drs. Christoph Rader and Jinsai Shang, The Scripps Research Institute, for use of and expertise in using the SPR instrument, respectively, Dr. S.B. Singh, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ, for providing S. platensis MA7327 and MA7339 wild-type strains, and the John Innes Center, Norwich, UK, for providing the REDIRECT technology kit. J.D.R. is supported in part by an Arnold O. Beckman Postdoctoral Fellowship. N.W. is supported in part by the Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and a scholarship from the Chinese Scholarship Council (201504910034). This is manuscript #29626 from The Scripps Research Institute.
Author contributions
B.S. conceived the project; L.-B.D., J.D.R., and B.S. designed the experiments; L.-B.D., J.D.R., D.K., N.W., and Y. Deng performed the experiments; L.-B.D., J.D.R., D.K., N.W., Y. Deng, Y.H., Y. Duan, and B.S. analyzed the results; C.Q.H. and K.N.H. performed the computational calculations; and L.-B.D., J.D.R., and B.S. wrote the manuscript with inputs from all co-authors.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-04747-y.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Ballatore C, Huryn DM, Smith AB. Carboxylic acid (bio)isosteres in drug design. Chem. Med. Chem. 2013;8:385–395. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201200585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pattabiraman VR, Bode JW. Rethinking amide bond synthesis. Nature. 2011;480:471–479. doi: 10.1038/nature10702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.deFigueiredo RM, Suppo JS, Campagne JM. Nonclassical routes for amide bond formation. Chem. Rev. 2016;116:12029–12122. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dunbar KL, Scharf DH, Litomska A, Hertweck C. Enzymatic carbon-sulfur bond formation in natural product biosynthesis. Chem. Rev. 2017;117:5521–5577. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Matthijs S, et al. The Pseudomonas siderophore quinolobactin is synthesized from xanthurenic acid, an intermediate of the kynurenine pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;52:371–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.03999.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Matthijs S, et al. Thioquinolobactin, a Pseudomonas siderophore with antifungal and anti-Pythium activity. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;9:425–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01154.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lewis TA, et al. A Pseudomonas stutzeri gene cluster encoding the biosynthesis of the CCl4-dechlorination agent pyridine-2,6-bis(thiocarboxylic acid) Environ. Microbiol. 2000;2:407–416. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00122.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dong LB, Rudolf JD, Shen B. Antibacterial sulfur-containing platensimycin and platencin congeners from Streptomyces platensis SB12029. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016;24:6348–6353. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.04.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang J, et al. Platensimycin is a selective FabF inhibitor with potent antibiotic properties. Nature. 2006;441:358–361. doi: 10.1038/nature04784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang J, et al. Discovery of platencin, a dual FabF and FabH inhibitor with in vivo antibiotic properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:7612–7616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700746104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rudolf JD, Dong LB, Shen B. Platensimycin and platencin: inspirations for chemistry, biology, enzymology, and medicine. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2017;133:139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Singh SB, et al. Isolation, structure, and absolute stereochemistry of platensimycin, a broad spectrum antibiotic discovered using an antisense differential sensitivity strategy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:11916–11920. doi: 10.1021/ja062232p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jayasuriya H, et al. Isolation and structure of Platencin: a FabH and FabF dual inhibitor with potent broad-spectrum antibiotic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007;46:4684–4688. doi: 10.1002/anie.200701058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rudolf JD, Dong LB, Huang T, Shen B. A genetically amenable platensimycin- and platencin-overproducer as a platform for biosynthetic explorations: a showcase of PtmO4, a long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase. Mol. BioSyst. 2015;11:2717–2726. doi: 10.1039/C5MB00303B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hindra, et al. Strain prioritization for natural product discovery by a high-throughput real-time PCR method. J. Nat. Prod. 2014;77:2296–2303. doi: 10.1021/np5006168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yu Z, et al. Engineering of Streptomyces platensis MA7339 for overproduction of platencin and congeners. Org. Lett. 2010;12:1744–1747. doi: 10.1021/ol100342m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rudolf JD, Dong LB, Manoogian K, Shen B. Biosynthetic origin of the ether ring in platensimycin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:16711–16721. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smanski MJ, Peterson RM, Rajski SR, Shen B. Engineered Streptomyces platensis strains that overproduce antibiotics platensimycin and platencin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:1299–1304. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01358-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smanski MJ, et al. Dedicated ent-kaurene and ent-atiserene synthases for platensimycin and platencin biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:13498–13503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106919108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang W, et al. Characterization of yatakemycin gene cluster revealing a radical S-adenosylmethionine dependent methyltransferase and highlighting spirocyclopropane biosynthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:8831–8840. doi: 10.1021/ja211098r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dong LB, Rudolf JD, Shen B. A mutasynthetic library of platensimycin and platencin analogues. Org. Lett. 2016;18:4606–4609. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b02248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jurgenson CT, Begley TP, Ealick SE. The structural and biochemical foundations of thiamin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009;78:569–603. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.072407.102340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mueller EG. Trafficking in persulfides: delivering sulfur in biosynthetic pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006;2:185–194. doi: 10.1038/nchembio779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Godert AM, Jin M, McLafferty FW, Begley TP. Biosynthesis of the thioquinolobactin siderophore: an interesting variation on sulfur transfer. J. Bacteriol. 2007;189:2941–2944. doi: 10.1128/JB.01200-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sasaki E, et al. Co-opting sulphur-carrier proteins from primary metabolic pathways for 2-thiosugar biosynthesis. Nature. 2014;510:427–431. doi: 10.1038/nature13256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Park JH, et al. Biosynthesis of the thiazole moiety of thiamin pyrophosphate (vitamin B1) Biochemistry. 2003;42:12430–12438. doi: 10.1021/bi034902z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Heider J. A new family of CoA-transferases. FEBS Lett. 2001;509:345–349. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03178-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Berthold CL, Toyota CG, Richards NGJ, Lindqvist Y. Reinvestigation of the catalytic mechanism of formyl-CoA transferase, a class III CoA-transferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:6519–6529. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M709353200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Todd JD, et al. Structural and regulatory genes required to make the gas dimethyl sulfide in bacteria. Science. 2007;315:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1135370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Alcolombri U, Laurino P, Lara-Astiaso P, Vardi A, Tawfik DS. DddD is a CoA-transferase/lyase producing dimethyl sulfide in the marine environment. Biochemistry. 2014;53:5473–5475. doi: 10.1021/bi500853s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wiegand I, Hilpert K, Hancock REW. Agar and broth dilution methods to determine the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antimicrobial substances. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:163–175. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kitamura K, et al. Binding free-energy calculation is a powerful tool for drug optimization: calculation and measurement of binding free energy for 7-azaindole derivatives to glycogen synthase kinase-3β. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2014;54:1653–1660. doi: 10.1021/ci400719v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Atkinson HJ, Morris JH, Ferrin TE, Babbitt PC. Using sequence similarity networks for visualization of relationships across diverse protein superfamilies. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nicolaou KC, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of platensimycin analogs with varying degrees of molecular complexity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:13110–13119. doi: 10.1021/ja8044376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gust B, Challis GL, Fowler K, Kieser T, Chater KF. PCR-targeted Streptomyces gene replacement identifies a protein domain needed for biosynthesis of the sesquiterpene soil odor geosmin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:1541–1546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0337542100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bierman M, et al. Plasmid cloning vectors for the conjugal transfer of DNA from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces spp. Gene. 1992;116:43–49. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.MacNeil DJ, et al. Analysis of Streptomyces avermitilis genes required for avermectin biosynthesis utilizing a novel integration vector. Gene. 1992;111:61–68. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90603-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Doumith M, et al. Analysis of genes involved in 6-deoxyhexose biosynthesis and transfer in Saccharopolyspora erythraea. Mol. Gen. Genet. 2000;264:477–485. doi: 10.1007/s004380000329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chater KF, Wilde LC. Streptomyces albus G mutants defective in the SalGI restriction-modification system. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1980;116:323–334. doi: 10.1099/00221287-116-2-323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ziermann R, Betlach MC. Recombinant polyketide synthesis in Streptomyces: engineering of improved host strains. Biotechniques. 1999;26:106–110. doi: 10.2144/99261st05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Komatsu M, et al. Engineered Streptomyces avermitilis host for heterologous expression of biosynthetic gene cluster for secondary metabolites. ACS Synth. Biol. 2013;2:384–396. doi: 10.1021/sb3001003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gomez-Escribano JP, Bibb MJ. Engineering Streptomyces coelicolor for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters. Microb. Biotechnol. 2011;4:207–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2010.00219.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lohman JR, Bingman CA, Phillips GN, Shen B. Structure of the bifunctional acyltransferase/decarboxylase LnmK from the leinamycin biosynthetic pathway revealing novel activity for a double-hot-dog fold. Biochemistry. 2013;52:902–911. doi: 10.1021/bi301652y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ho SN, Hunt HD, Horton RM, Pullen JK, Pease LR. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 1989;77:51–59. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90358-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09 Rev. D.01 (Gaussian Inc., 2013).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Proteins from S. platensis CB00739 have been deposited to protein database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), under accession code AIW55578 for PtmA3, AIW55577 for PtmU4, AVR47602 for PtmS1, AVR47603 for PtmS2, AVR47604 for PtmS3, AVR47605 for PtmS4, AVR47606 for SpSCP1, and AVR47607 for SpSCP2. All other relevant data that support the findings of this study are available in the manuscript and the Supplementary Information.