Abstract
Deamidation of asparaginyl and glutaminyl residues causes time-dependent changes in charge and conformation of peptides and proteins. Quantitative and experimentally verified predictive calculations of the deamidation rates of 1,371 asparaginyl residues in a representative collection of 126 human proteins have been performed. These rates suggest that deamidation is a biologically relevant phenomenon in a remarkably large percentage of human proteins.
Keywords: in vivo deamidation‖asparaginyl residues
Deamidation of asparaginyl (Asn) and glutaminyl (Gln) residues to produce aspartyl (Asp) and glutamyl (Glu) residues causes structurally and biologically important alterations in peptide and protein structures. At neutral pH, deamidation introduces a negative charge at the reaction site and can also lead to structural isomerization. Early work established that deamidation occurs in vitro and in vivo, and that the rates of deamidation depend on primary sequence, three-dimensional (3D) structure, pH, temperature, ionic strength, buffer ions, and other solution properties (1–11). It has been hypothesized (3, 5, 7, 12, 13) that Asn and Gln may serve, through deamidation, as molecular clocks which time biological processes such as protein turnover, homeostatic control, and organismic development and aging, as well as mediators of postsynthetic production of new proteins of unique biological value.
Deamidation has been observed and characterized in a wide variety of proteins. It has been shown to regulate some time-dependent biological processes (8, 9) and to correlate with others, such as development and aging. There are many reports of deamidation under physiological conditions in proteins of biological significance. For examples, see refs. 14–18.
Extensive evidence suggests that deamidation of Asn at neutral pH usually proceeds through a cyclic imide reaction mechanism (19–21). Sometimes the Asp produced by deamidation is isomerized to isoAsp. The in vivo reversal of this isomerization has been widely reported, but reversal of deamidation itself and of the introduced negative charge has not been observed.
Deamidation rates depend on the amino acid residues near Asn and Gln in the peptide chain with sequence-determined deamidation half-times at neutral pHs and 37°C in the range of 1–500 days for Asn and 100–>5,000 days for Gln (7, 13).
Sequence-determined Asn and Gln deamidation rates are modulated by peptide and protein 3D structures. Deamidation of peptides is observed at both Asn and Gln, largely in accordance with sequence-controlled rates. Deamidation of proteins, which is usually slowed by 3D structure, occurs primarily at Asn except in very long-lived proteins where Gln deamidation is also observed. In a few instances, 3D structure has been reported to increase deamidation rate.
The deamidation rates of individual Asn residues in a protein can be reliably predicted as a result of two recent advances. First, the sequence-controlled Asn deamidation rates of most of the 400 possible near-neighbor combinations in pentapeptide models have been measured (13), and the relevance of this rate library has been established (22). Second, these rates and the 3D structures of proteins with well characterized deamidations have been combined to produce a computation method that correctly predicts the deamidation rates of most Asn residues for which the 3D structure is known (23). This method is more than 95% reliable in predicting relative deamidation rates of Asn residues within a single protein and is also useful for the prediction of absolute deamidation rates.
It is, therefore, now possible to compute the expected deamidation rate of any protein for which the primary and 3D structures are known, except for very long-lived proteins. These proteins require measurement of the 400 Gln pentapeptide rates.
Materials and Methods
Calculation Method.
The Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (PDB) was searched to select 126 human proteins of general biochemical interest and of known 3D structure without bias toward any known data about their deamidation, except for 13 proteins (as noted in Table 1) where deamidation has been measured.
Table 1.
Protein | 1/2 Life, days | 1/10 Life, days | Protein | 1/2 Life, days | 1/10 Life, days |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Uracil-DNA glycosylase (1LAU) | 1.0 | 0.15 | Proinsulin (1EFE) | 110 | 17 |
Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase (1URO) | 1.0 | 0.15 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase P38 (1WFC) | 110 | 17 |
Transaldolase (1F05) | 1.4 | 0.21 | Glutathione reductase (1BWC) | 120 | 18 |
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (1LMW) | 1.7 | 0.26 | Ribonuclease 4 (1RNF) | 130 | 20 |
Purine nucleoside phosphorylase (1ULA) | 1.8 | 0.27 | Aldose reductase (1EL3) | 130 | 20 |
Growth hormone receptor (1A22) | 2.4 | 0.36 | α-Lactalbumin (1B9O) | 130 | 20 |
Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase (1F8A) | 2.4 | 0.36 | Ornithine transcarbamoylase (1OTH) | 130 | 20 |
Thymidylate synthase (1HW3) | 2.7 | 0.41 | Malic enzyme (1EFK) | 140 | 21 |
Procathepsin B (3PBH) | 2.9 | 0.44 | Glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (1QKI) | 140 | 21 |
d-Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (3GPD) | 4.2 | 0.64 | Procarboxypeptidase A2 (1AYE) | 150 | 23 |
Karyopherin β2 (1QBK) | 5.3 | 0.81 | Apoptosis regulator bax (1F16) | 170 | 26 |
Glutathione S-transferase (12GS) | 5.3 | 0.81 | Ornithine decarboxylase (1D7K) | 170 | 26 |
N-acetylgalactosamine-4-sulfatase (1FSU) | 6.1 | 0.93 | UDP-galactose 4-epimerase (1EK6) | 180 | 27 |
Fructose bisphosphate aldolase (4ALD) | 7.6 | 1.2 | Stem cell factor (1EXZ)* | 180 | 27 |
Intestinal fatty acid binding protein (3IFB) | 7.6 | 1.2 | Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase (1BZY)* | 180 | 27 |
Cyclophilin A (1AWQ) | 8.7 | 1.3 | Electron transfer flavoprotein (1EFV) | 190 | 29 |
Vascular endothelial growth factor (2VPF)* | 10 | 1.5 | Phenylalanine hydroxylase (1DMW) | 220 | 33 |
Inositol monophosphatase (1IMB) | 15 | 2.3 | Annexin V (1ANX) | 220 | 33 |
Pancreatic inhibitor variant 3 (1CGI) | 16 | 2.4 | Platelet factor 4-HPF4 (1RHP) | 230 | 35 |
d-Glucose 6-phosphotransferase (1HKC) | 16 | 2.4 | Insulin (2HIU)* | 260 | 40 |
Myeloperoxidase (1MHL) | 16 | 2.4 | Prethrombin2 (1HAG) | 260 | 40 |
α-Chymotrypsinogen (1CGI) | 16 | 2.4 | Interleukin-4 (2CYK) | 270 | 41 |
Lysophospholipase (1LCL) | 16 | 2.4 | Interleukin-1β (2I1B) | 280 | 43 |
Interleukin-16 (1I16) | 17 | 2.6 | Neutrophil (gelatinase) (1DFV) | 290 | 44 |
C-AMP-dependent kinase A (1CMK) | 19 | 2.9 | O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (1EH6) | 300 | 46 |
Pepsinogen (1HTR) | 20 | 3.0 | Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase isomerase (1D9T) | 320 | 49 |
Angiogenin (1A4Y)* | 21 | 3.2 | Quinone reductase type 2 (1QR2) | 330 | 50 |
Fibroblast growth factor (2AFG)* | 21 | 3.2 | Nad(P)H dehydrogenase (1QBG) | 350 | 53 |
Gastric lipase (1HLG) | 21 | 3.2 | Serum albumin (1E7G) | 360 | 55 |
Calmodulin (1CTR) | 21 | 3.2 | Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (1C5G) | 370 | 56 |
Bone morphogenetic protein 7 (1BMP) | 21 | 3.2 | T cell surface glycoprotein CD4 (1CDJ)* | 380 | 58 |
Acetylcholinesterase (1F8U) | 23 | 3.5 | α-Thrombin (1A3E) | 380 | 58 |
Retinol binding protein (1BRQ)* | 24 | 3.6 | Eosinophil cationic protein (1QMT) | 430 | 65 |
Catalase (1QQW) | 25 | 3.8 | Ribonuclease inhibitor (1A4Y) | 450 | 68 |
Dihydrofolate reductase (1DRF) | 25 | 3.8 | Transforming growth factor-β two (1KLA) | 460 | 70 |
Interleukin-10 (2ILK) | 25 | 3.8 | Thioltransferase (1JHB)* | 470 | 71 |
Farnesyltransferase (1EZF) | 26 | 4.0 | Profilin 1 (1FIL) | 480 | 73 |
S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase (1A7A) | 28 | 4.3 | Lithostathine (1LIT) | 490 | 74 |
Procathepsin K (1BY8) | 28 | 4.3 | Phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein (1BD9) | 680 | 100 |
3-Methyladenine DNA glycosylase (1BNK) | 35 | 5.3 | Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (1D3G) | 720 | 110 |
Medium chain acyl-coa dehydrogenase (1EGE) | 36 | 5.5 | Quinone reductase (1D4A) | 750 | 110 |
Homeobox protein PAX-6 (6PAX) | 39 | 5.9 | Hemoglobin (1A3N)* | 780 | 120 |
α1-Antitrypsin (1QLP) | 40 | 6.1 | Retinoic acid receptor (1BY4) | 860 | 130 |
Carbonic anhydrase I (1HCB) | 45 | 6.8 | Psoriasin (1PSR) | 890 | 140 |
GTP-binding protein (1DOA) | 45 | 6.8 | ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (1E0S) | >1000 | 150 |
Ferritin (2FHA) | 46 | 7.0 | Lectin L-14-II (1HLC) | >1000 | 180 |
Procathepsin L (1CS8) | 48 | 7.3 | Nucleoside diphosphate kinase (1NUE) | >1000 | 210 |
Growth hormone (1HGU)* | 51 | 7.8 | l-3-Hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (1F0Y) | >1000 | 230 |
Triose phosphate isomerase (1HTI)* | 52 | 7.9 | Interleukin 2 (3INK)* | >1000 | 230 |
Interleukin-6 (1IL6) | 56 | 8.5 | Transthyretin (1DVQ) | >1000 | 290 |
DNA polymerase β (1BPX) | 58 | 8.8 | Single-stranded DNA binding protein (3ULL) | >1000 | 290 |
Glutathione synthetase (2HGS) | 58 | 8.8 | Protein kinase C interacting protein 1 (1KPA) | >1000 | 300 |
Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (1FTA) | 59 | 9.0 | GTPase ran (1QBK) | >1000 | 380 |
CDK2 kinase (1BUH) | 65 | 9.9 | Annexin III (1AXN) | >1000 | 430 |
Ribonuclease A (1AFK) | 66 | 10 | Fk506-binding protein (1D6O) | >1000 | 710 |
Ap endonuclease (1BIX) | 72 | 11 | Interleukin-5 (1HUL) | >1000 | 760 |
Carbonic anhydrase IV (1ZNC) | 72 | 11 | Heme oxygenase (1QQ8) | >1000 | 780 |
Branched-chain α-keto acid dehydrogenase (1DTW) | 81 | 12 | Histone H2A.Z (1F66) | >1000 | >1000 |
Argininosuccinate lyase (1AOS) | 83 | 13 | Copper transport protein ATOX1 (1FEE) | >1000 | >1000 |
Creatine kinase (1QK1) | 84 | 13 | 17 β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (1DHT) | >1000 | >1000 |
Carbonic anhydrase II (1BV3) | 90 | 14 | Myoglobin (2MM1) | >1000 | >1000 |
Interleukin-8 (1IL8) | 95 | 14 | Ubiquitin (1D3Z) | >1000 | >1000 |
Dihydropteridine reductase (1HDR) | 100 | 15 | Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (1RHG) | >1000 | >1000 |
The deamidation half-time of each of the 126 proteins was obtained by first computing the deamidation coefficients (CD) of each Asn and then combining these values into the deamidation index (ID) by the methods reported (23).
The deamidation coefficient, CD, is defined as CD = (0.01)(t1/2)(ef(Cm,CSn,Sn)), where t1/2 is the pentapeptide primary structure half-life (13), Cm is a structure proportionality factor, CSn is the 3D structure coefficient for the nth structure observation, Sn is that observation, and f (Cm,CSn,Sn) = Cm[(CS1)(S1) + (CS2)(S2) + (CS3)(S3) − (CS4,5)(S4)/(S5) + (CS6)(S6) + (CS7)(S7) + (CS8)(S8) + (CS9)(S9) + (CS10)(1 − S10) + (CS11)(5 − S11) + (CS12)(5 − S12)]. The structure observations, Sn, are those that impede deamidation, including hydrogen bonds, α-helices, β-sheets, and peptide inflexibilities.
For Asn in an α-helical region:
- S1=
distance in residues inside the α-helix from the NH2 end, where S1 = 1 designates the end residue in the helix, 2 is the second residue, and 3 is the third. If the position is 4 or greater, S1 = 0.
- S2=
distance in residues inside the α-helix from the COOH end, where S1 = 1 designates the end residue in the helix, 2 is the second residue, and 3 is the third. If the position is 4 or greater or S1 ≠ 0, then S2 = 0
- S3=
1 if Asn is designated as completely inside the α-helix because it is 4 or more residues from both ends. If the Asn is completely inside, S3 = 1, S1 = 0, and S2 = 0. If S1 ≠ 0 or S2 ≠ 0, then S3 = 0.
For flexibility of a loop including Asn between two adjacent antiparallel β-sheets:
- S4=
number of residues in the loop.
- S5=
number of hydrogen bonds in the loop. S5 ≥ 1 by definition.
For hydrogen bonds:
- S6=
the number of hydrogen bonds to the Asn side chain C=O group. Acceptable values are 0, 1, and 2.
- S7=
the number of hydrogen bonds to the Asn side chain NH2 group. Acceptable values are 0, 1, and 2.
- S8=
the number of hydrogen bonds to the backbone N in the peptide bond on the COOH side of Asn. Hydrogen bonds counted in S6 or S7 are not included. Acceptable values are 0 and 1. This nitrogen is used in the five-membered succinimide ring.
- S9=
additional hydrogen bonds, not included in S6, S7, and S8, that would need to be broken to form the succinimide ring.
For Asn situated so that no α-helix, β-sheet, or disulfide bridge structure is between the Asn and the end of the peptide chain:
- S10=
1 if the number of residues between the Asn and the nearest such structure is 3 or more. If the number of intervening residues is 2, 1, or 0, or if the Asn is not between structure and chain end, then S10 = 0.
If the Asn lies near to any α-helix, β-sheet, or disulfide bridge structures:
- S11=
the number of residues between the Asn and the structure on the NH2 side, up to a maximum of 5. Values of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are acceptable.
- S12=
the number of residues between the Asn and the structure on the COOH side, up to a maximum of 5. Values of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are acceptable.
Hydrogen bonds are accepted if the bond length is 3.3 Å or less and there is room in the structure to accommodate the van der Waals radius of the hydrogen. All primary structure t1/2 values are those published (13), except for Asn with carboxyl-side Pro, Asn, or Gln, and Asn without a free amide as a result of binding to metals or other moieties. Estimated values of t1/2 of 500, 40, 60, and 500 days are used for AsnPro, AsnAsn, AsnGln, and bound Asn, respectively.
The coefficients Cm and CSn were optimized by means of the DP method (23–25) with an increased set of proteins (26–29). DP is a measure of the percentage accuracy in classifying the relative deamidation rates of Asn residues in a set of proteins (23). Proteins added to the original set (23) and their Protein Data Bank numbers were bovine DNase I (2DNJ), human hirudin (4HTC), bovine calmodulin (1A29), and human vascular endothelial growth factor (2VPF). Human T cell surface glycoprotein CD4 (1CDJ) was omitted. The Asn 3D environments in all 31 of the calibration proteins were examined and retabulated. These 31 proteins include all of the proteins suitable for this purpose that we have found in the research literature.
The optimized values were Cm = 0.48, CS1 = 1.0, CS2 = 2.5, CS3 = 10.0, CS4,5 = 0.5, CS6 = 1.0, CS7 = 1.0, CS8 = 3.0, CS9 = 2.0, CS10 = 2.0, CS11 = 0.2, and CS12 = 0.7. These values are identical to those found in ref. 23. The deamidation resolving power (DP) was found to be 95.4%.
The protein deamidation index is defined as ID = [Σ (CDn)−1]−1, where CDn is CD for the nth Asn residue. Therefore, (100)(ID) is an estimate of the initial single-residue deamidation half-time for the protein with all Asn residues considered.
Comparison of Calculated Rates with Experimental Rates
The Medline and Citation Index databases were searched for all proteins in which the deamidation rates of identified Asn residues have been reported for 37°C solutions with pH at or near 7.4. Reports were found for a total of 10 individual Asn and 3 combinations of Asn residues in 10 different protein types (17, 18, 23, 29–35). These include 7 proteins that are in the human set of 126 and 3 proteins from other species.
The names, Protein Data Bank numbers, Asn residue position, and computed (100)(ID) values, respectively, for these proteins are rabbit aldolase: 1ADO, 360, 8.3; human vascular endothelial growth factor: 2VPF, 10, 10; Escherichia coli Hpr-phosphocarrier protein: 1HDN, 12–38, 89–22; human fibroblast growth factor: 2AFG, 7, 64; human angiogenin: 1B1I, All, 28; human retinal binding protein: 1BRQ, All, 29; human growth hormone (GH): 1HGU, All, 51; human triose phosphate isomerase: 1HTI, 71, 78; bovine ribonuclease A: 1AFK, 67, 84; and human hemoglobin: 1A3N, with Asn mutants at α50-β80-β82, 47-190-184.
Fig. 1 compares the computed half-times for pH 7.4, 37°C, 0.15 M Tris⋅HCl buffer with the experimentally observed (17, 18, 29–35) values. The computed values compare favorably with the experimental values in Tris buffer. In phosphate buffer, the experimental deamidation rates are, on average, 2-fold higher than calculated, and the 3 in vivo human blood values average 3-fold higher. This result is entirely as expected because deamidation at neutral pH is subject to catalysis by solution ions. Tris is a very mild catalyst of deamidation. Phosphate is a much stronger catalyst of deamidation in peptides (6, 11) and proteins (17) as compared with Tris. Tissue culture medium contains components even more catalytic of deamidation than phosphate (36). Least-squares lines as shown in Fig. 1 give experimental deamidation rates relative to the computed values in Tris, phosphate, and in vivo blood erythrocytes of 1.06, 2.07, and 3.01, respectively.
The agreement between the calculated values and Tris experimental values in Fig. 1 does not arise from computational forcing. The computational method (23) uses experimental sequence-determined pentapeptide deamidation rates in Tris buffer and a parametric 3D structure function with adjustable constants. The optimization method (23–25) for these constants used only the ordered Asn residue instabilities in a wide variety of proteins and buffer types. No experimental absolute deamidation rates were used. The agreement arises because the computational method correctly estimates the relative primary and 3D contributions to the deamidation rate of each Asn, and the primary rates were experimentally determined in Tris.
Results and Discussion
Averaged over all 1,371 Asn, the contributions to the deamidation reaction activation energy from primary and 3D structures are about equal, although they vary widely for individual Asn residues. The average relative deamidation rates of Asn within single proteins in this 126-protein set are 60% determined by primary and 40% by 3D structure, which are the same proportions found for a different 24-protein set (23). The cumulative distribution function of the calculated first-order rate constants for deamidation of the 1,371 Asn residues is shown in Fig. 2a.
The computed single deamidation half-times in pH 7.4, 37°C, 0.15 M Tris⋅HCl buffer for the 126 human proteins are shown in Table 1. Table 2 summarizes, on the basis of Table 1, the extent to which deamidation is expected to occur within this set of 126 proteins.
Table 2.
Days at 37°C pH 7.4 | Proteins singly deamidated by >1/10
|
Proteins singly deamidated by >1/2
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tris | Phosphate | Tris | Phosphate | |
1 | 10% | 13% | 1.6% | 4% |
5 | 31% | 43% | 8% | 13% |
10 | 43% | 56% | 13% | 20% |
50 | 71% | 82% | 37% | 49% |
A phosphate buffer correction of (2)(computed Tris rate) was applied to obtain the phosphate rate of each protein. Percentages produced in physiological solutions may be even higher. Steady-state physiological percentages are lowered by protein turnover.
The percentages of deamidation in living tissues are probably higher than shown in Tables 1 and 2. Physiological fluids contain many inorganic, organic, and biochemical substances with deamidase activity. We know of no reported instance, in vivo or in vitro, of an experimentally measured protein deamidation rate that is slower than its computed Tris rate. All reported rates are the same or faster. There are two instances of individual proteins (13, 23) in which negative results for the detection of deamidation in specific amides indicates that the rates, if measured, might be slower than calculated.
This deamidation is not a random consequence of the presence of Asn residues in proteins. The fast deamidations summarized in Table 2 result from a set of Asn residues with unusual primary and 3D structures, which comprise about 5% of the total. As illustrated in Fig. 2, most individual Asn deamidation rates are slower. Because a large number of similarly sized partially independent factors determine Asn deamidation rates in proteins, the distribution functions in Fig. 2 would be expected to be Gaussian. Fig. 2b shows the deviation from Gaussian caused by the unusual Asn residues.
Conclusions
The unstable Asn residues that give rise to the deamidation rates shown in Tables 1 and 2 and Figs. 1 and 2 are apparently preferred over the many stable Asn residues that could easily be genetically specified. As shown in Fig. 2, most Asn residues are far more stable. Moreover, even if it were not a result of preference, this introduction of negative charges into protein structures would do unacceptable biochemical damage unless it was being used for compensating biological purposes.
Although postsynthetic deamidated proteins are often observed in tissue extracts, their production can be obscured. For example, the in vivo steady-state concentrations of the deamidated forms of cytochrome c are much lower than expected because they are preferentially degraded (7, 8). Those deamidated forms that are not degraded and, therefore, accumulate in living tissues may have other unique biological purposes. Otherwise, their accumulation would be disadvantageous.
Moreover, the deamidation rates in living tissues are changeable. Through the production of enzymatic deamidases or the control of other physiological parameters that affect the reaction activation energy of deamidation, a living cell could easily increase the overall deamidation rates of its proteins to adapt to changes in physiological circumstances. Decrease of deamidation rates to values below those in Tris summarized in Table 2, however, would be difficult except in specialized structures. Deamidation has been observed in the proteins of many other organisms, too; thus, similar findings may be expected.
In summary, reliable and experimentally verified predictive calculations of the deamidation rates of 1,371 Asn residues in a representative collection of 126 human proteins have been carried out. The results of these calculations show that deamidation of human proteins under physiological conditions is so extensive that it is probably of pervasive and fundamental biological importance. Otherwise, the genetic code would specify stable Asn configurations. Likely uses of deamidation include the timing of biological processes and the postsynthetic production of uniquely useful proteins.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor and Mrs. R. B. Merrifield for advice and encouragement, and the Kinsman foundation and other donors to the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine for financial support. Additional information is available at www.deamidation.org.
Abbreviation
- 3D
three-dimensional
References
- 1.Flatmark T. Acta Chem Scand. 1964;18:1656–1666. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flatmark T, Sletten K. J Biol Chem. 1968;243:1623–1629. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Robinson A B, McKerrow J H, Cary P. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1970;66:753–757. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.3.753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Robinson A B, Scotchler J W, McKerrow J H. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:8156–8159. doi: 10.1021/ja00805a032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Robinson A B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974;71:885–888. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.3.885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Scotchler J W, Robinson A B. Anal Biochem. 1974;59:319–322. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Robinson A B, Rudd C. Curr Top Cell Regul. 1974;8:247–295. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-152808-9.50013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Robinson A B, McKerrow J H, Legaz M. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1974;6:31–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1974.tb02355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McKerrow J H, Robinson A B. Science. 1974;183:85. doi: 10.1126/science.183.4120.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Robinson A B, Scotchler J W. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1974;6:279–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1974.tb02385.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McKerrow J H, Robinson A B. Anal Biochem. 1971;42:565–568. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(71)90074-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Robinson A B, Robinson L R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:8880–8884. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.20.8880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Robinson N E, Robinson A B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:944–949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.3.944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Solstad T, Flatmark T. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:6302–6310. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lindner H, Sarg B, Hoertnagl B, Helliger W. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:13324–13330. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.21.13324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takemoto L, Boyle D. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26109–26112. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002809200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sun A, Yuksel K U, Gracy R W. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;322:361–368. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1995.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Capasso S, Salvadori S. J Pept Res. 1999;54:377–382. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bornstein P, Balian G. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:4854–4856. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meinwald Y C, Stimson E R, Scheraga H A. Int J Pept Protein Res. 1986;28:79–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1986.tb03231.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Geiger T, Clarke S. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:785–794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Robinson N E, Robinson A B, Merrifield R B. J Pept Res. 2001;57:483–493. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3011.2001.00863.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Robinson N E, Robinson A B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:4367–4372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.071066498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Robinson A B, Westall F C. J Orthomolec Psych. 1974;3:70–79. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Robinson A B, Pauling L. Clin Chem. 1974;20:961–965. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cacia J, Quan C P, Vasser M, Sliwkowski M B, Frenz J. J Chromatogr. 1993;634:229–239. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(93)83009-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bischoff R, Lepage P, Jaquinod M, Cauet G, Acker-Klein M, Clesse D, Laporte M, Bayol A, Dorsselaer A V, Roitsch C. Biochemistry. 1993;32:725–734. doi: 10.1021/bi00053a042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Potter S M, Henzel W J, Aswad D W. Protein Sci. 1993;2:1648–1663. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560021011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goolcharran C, Cleland J L, Keck R, Jones A J S, Borchardt R T. AAPS PharmSci. 2000;2:U73–U86. doi: 10.1208/ps020105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Brennan T V, Anderson J W, Zongchao J, Waygood E B, Clarke S. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:24586–24595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Volkin D B, Verticelli A M, Bruner M W, Marfia K E, Tsai P K, Sardana M K, Middaugh C R. J Pharm Sci. 1994;84:7–11. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600840104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hallahan T W, Shapiro R, Strydom D J, Vallee B L. Biochemistry. 1992;31:8022–8029. doi: 10.1021/bi00149a036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Minic Z, Hranisavljevic J, Vucelic D. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1997;41:1057–1066. doi: 10.1080/15216549700202131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lewis U J, Cheever E V, Hopkins W C. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1970;214:498–508. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(70)90310-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Paleari R, Paglietti E, Mosca A, Mortarino M, Maccioni L, Satta S, Cao A, Galanello R. Clin Chem. 1999;45:21–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Robinson A B, Scotchler J E. J Int Res Commun. 1973;1:8. [Google Scholar]