Skip to main content
Cancer Microenvironment logoLink to Cancer Microenvironment
. 2018 Mar 27;11(1):93–96. doi: 10.1007/s12307-018-0208-2

Matrix Metalloproteinase 8: Could it Benefit the CAR-T Cell Therapy of Solid Tumors?- a- Commentary on Therapeutic Potential

Alireza Mardomi 1,2, Saeid Abediankenari 1,2,
PMCID: PMC6008262  PMID: 29589335

Introduction

Since the first experiences with genetically modified T cells in the 1980s, the concept of adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been evolved extensively [1, 2]. The introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), an artificially designed receptor on T cells against desired tumor antigens, has propelled the adoptive T cell therapy toward fair outcomes. A CAR is usually consisted up of an extracellular single chain fragment of variable (scFv) obtained from an antibody, a hinge, a transmembrane region and intracellular signaling domains [3]. This chimeric receptor provides the possibility for T cells to be activated MHC independently [4]. Therefore, can overcome the MHC down regulation and diminished antigen presentation obsereved in several malignancies [5]. The majority of CAR-T cell trials have been conducted on B cell and T cell malignancy platforms. Especially, anti-CD19 redirected CAR-T cells caused great success rate which was complete remission of 69–90% of patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic lymphoma [610]. Developing generations and multi-receptor approaches of CAR-T cells are all planned to maximize the efficacy and decline the side effects [11].

CAR-T Cells in Solid Tumors

CAR-T cell therapy has been accompanied by fair outcomes in the case of B cell and T cell lymphomas, acute myeloid lymphoma (AML), Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma [1215]. Due to overexpression of CD19 in B cell malignancies, this tumor associated antigen has been a target of choice for CAR-T cell therapy of B cell lymphomas. So that, CD19 targeted CAR-T cells have attained the most successful outcomes with CAR-T cell therapy until now [14, 16].

Numerous CAR-T cells redirected against a variety of solid tumors have been applied in clinical trials. Although these trials have been reviewed elsewhere [5], Table 1 represents some of them in brief.

Table 1.

Some of the clinical trials registered for CAR-T cell therapy on solid tumors

Antigen Cancer types Status Phase Clinical trial identifier
HER2 Breast cancer Recruiting 1&2 NCT02547961
Glioblastoma Recruiting 1 NCT02442297
HER2+ cancers Recruiting 1 NCT02713984
Mesothelin Metastatic HER2- breast cancer Recruiting 1 NCT02792114
Malignant pleural disease Recruiting 1 NCT02414269
Pancreatic cancer Recruiting 1 NCT02706782
GD2 Neuroblastoma Ongoing 1 NCT01822652
EGFR Advanced glioma Recruiting 1 NCT02331693
EGFRvIII Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme Recruiting 1 NCT02844062
GPC3 Advanced HCC Recruiting 1&2 NCT02715362
CEA CEA+ cancers Recruiting 1 NCT02349724
EpCAM Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and breast cancer Recruiting 1 NCT02915445
Stomach neoplasms Recruiting 1&2 NCT02725125
Liver Neoplasms Recruiting 1&2 NCT02729493
MUC1 MUC1+ solid tumors Recruiting 1&2 NCT02617134
PSMA Prostate cancer Recruiting 1 NCT01140373
EphA2 EphA2 malignant glioma Recruiting 1&2 NCT02575261
FAP FAP malignant pleural mesothelioma Recruiting 1 NCT01722149
cMet Triple negative breast cancer Ongoing 1 NCT01837602
CD171 Neuroblastoma; ganglioneuroblastoma Recruiting 1 NCT02311621

In contrast to hematological malignancies, CAR-T cell therapy of solid tumors is encountered to some obstacles. Lack of exclusive antigens restrains the establishment of highly specific CAR-T cells. A CAR-T cell with low specificity can cause severe off target effects and restrain the clinical application. On the other hand, the immunosuppressive microenvironment of solid tumors impairs the effector function of recruited CAR-T cells [17].

Apart from aforementioned problems, insufficient homing of effector cells into solid tumors is a critical obstacle [18]. Infiltration of effector T cells in inadequate numbers propels the desired immune-effector functions to be overwhelmed by the immunosuppressive mileu. Low population of effector T cells in a tumor cannot overcome the high amplitude of malignant cells residing in a compact mass of tumor [19]. In addition, lack of appropriate chemokine receptors on CAR-T cells hinders their sufficient chemotaxis toward chemokine gradients [5].

Moreover, stiff extracellular matrix (ECM) and collagen fibers produced by cancerous cells and cancer associated fibroblasts impede the homing of immune-effector cells into tumors. Disability of T cells to pass through the collagen barriers and unsuccessful infiltration has been shown in breast, lung and pancreas carcinomas [2022]. Collagen fibers can also support tumor growth and invasiveness through augmentation of prolactin and integrin signaling pathways [23, 24].

Strategies to Improve T Cell Tumor Homing

So far, multiple strategies have been applied to overcome the poor infiltration of T cells into solid tumors. Tumor modification prior to CAR-T cell therapy by an Ad5Δ24 oncolytic virus has been performed successfully for chemokine expression in malignant islets [25]. Chemotherapies can also exert a relative increase in local chemokine concentrations of various tumors [26]. Another approach is to overexpress specific chemokine receptors on CAR-T cells. The positive effect of CXCR2, CCR4 and CCR2b overexpression on the tumor trafficking of CAR-T cells have been documented [2729]. Boosting integrin function is another strategy for improving T cell homing into tumor [30].

Matrix Metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are Zn dependent endo-peptidase proteases, capable of proteolysis of almost all ECM components [31]. Based on the type of dominant substrate, MMPs are classified into sub-categories such as gelatinases, collagenases, stromelysins, MT-MMPs and others [32]. MMPs are involved in a myriad of physiologic functions such as organ development and tissue remodeling. Some MMPs play pathogenic roles in inflammatory disorders and cancer [33, 34]. The pathogenic roles of MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9 in pre-metastatic niche formation has been verified in numerous neoplasms [33, 35]. Unlike numerous MMPs with pro-metastatic activity, MMP8, also known as collagenase-2 [32], exhibits unique features. So that, the anti-cancer and anti-metastasis activities have been attributed to MMP8 in melanoma and breast adenocarcinoma. Also, the MMP8 expression was associated with good prognosis and survival in the mentioned cancers [36].

Evidence on the Anti-Tumor Activity of MMP8

An animal model of aggressive mammary carcinoma was exploited by Decock et al. [37] to evaluate the effect of MMP8 heterozygosity and knockout on tumor formation in polyoma virus middle T oncogene-driven (MMTV-PyMT) mouse. This study demonstrated an accelerated tumor formation, higher average volume and tumor vascularity in MMP8 heterozygote and knockout animals. It has been explored that MMP8 protects the animals against metastasis through modulation of tumor cell adhesion. Indeed, MMP8 overexpressing tumor cells have an increased attachment to ECM components [36]. As another mechanism of action, it has been shown that MMP8 can cleave decorin, a small proteoglycan in ECM. The cleaved decorin possesses an ability to sequester TGF-β1. Therefore the tumor progression caused by TGF-β signaling could be hindered upon decorin activation [38]. The mentioned mechanisms are the probable underlings for the reported positive correlations of MMP8 expression to good prognosis and low metastasis rate.

Discussion

Despite the collagenase nature of MMP8 [32], it has been extensively supported by the literature for its anti-tumor and anti-metastatic activities [3638]. Although some hurdles of solid tumor CAR-T cell therapy such as immunosuppressive microenvironment has been overcome by the introduction of anti-PD-1 blocking antibody and PD-1 knockout CAR-T cells [39, 40], the expected success rates still remain to be achieved.

Regarding the lower efficacies of CAR-T cell therapy in solid tumors compared to hematological malignancies, it seems that the missed key in developing well-suited CAR-T cells for solid tumors is a neglect to special physical properties of solid tumors. Hypothetically, MMP8 can provide the possibility for CAR-T cells to pass through the stiff ECM and collagen barriers posed by solid tumors (Fig. 1). Modification of CAR-T cells to overexpress MMP8 along with other modifications such as chemokine receptor overexpression and inhibitory receptor blockage seems to increase the efficiency of solid tumor CAR-T cell therapy and help to approximate its outcomes to those obtained for hematological malignancies.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of the behavior of CAR-T cells (a) and (hypothetically) MMP8 overexpressing CAR-T cells (b) upon arrival to solid tumor islets. As a commentary, MMP8 can destruct the collagen fibers encompassing the tumor and enhance the homing of CAR-T cells

References

  • 1.Rosenberg SA, Eberlein TJ, Grimm EA, Lotze MT, Mazumder A, Rosenstein M. Development of long-term cell lines and lymphoid clones reactive against murine and human tumors: a new approach to the adoptive immunotherapy of cancer. Surgery. 1982;92:328–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rosenberg SA. Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer: accomplishments and prospects. Cancer Treat Rep. 1984;68:233–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Srivastava S, Riddell SR. Engineering CAR-T cells: design concepts. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:494–502. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klebanoff CA, Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP. Prospects for gene-engineered T cell immunotherapy for solid cancers. Nat Med. 2016;22:26–36. doi: 10.1038/nm.4015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Han S, Latchoumanin O, Wu G, et al. Recent clinical trials utilizing chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapies against solid tumors. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Grupp SA, Laetsch TW, Buechner J, et al (2016) Analysis of a global registration trial of the efficacy and safety of CTL019 in pediatric and young adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)
  • 7.Maude SL, Pulsipher MA, Boyer MW, et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of CTL019 in the first US phase II multicenter trial in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of an interim analysis
  • 8.Maude SL, Frey N, Shaw PA, Aplenc R, Barrett DM, Bunin NJ, Chew A, Gonzalez VE, Zheng Z, Lacey SF, Mahnke YD, Melenhorst JJ, Rheingold SR, Shen A, Teachey DT, Levine BL, June CH, Porter DL, Grupp SA. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1507–1517. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:224ra25–224ra25. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lee DW, Kochenderfer JN, Stetler-Stevenson M, Cui YK, Delbrook C, Feldman SA, Fry TJ, Orentas R, Sabatino M, Shah NN, Steinberg SM, Stroncek D, Tschernia N, Yuan C, Zhang H, Zhang L, Rosenberg SA, Wayne AS, Mackall CL. T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet. 2015;385:517–528. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61403-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Srivastava S, Riddell SR. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy: challenges to bench-to-bedside efficacy. J Immunol. 2018;200:459–468. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Martínez-Cingolani C, Bories JC. Development of chimeric antigen receptors for multiple myeloma. Biochem Soc Trans. 2016;44:397–405. doi: 10.1042/BST20150280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tao Z, Wang M, Wang J (2016) Advances in immunotherapy of acute myeloid leukemia by using chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells. Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi= Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi 37:160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Zhu Y, Tan Y, Ou R, Zhong Q, Zheng L, du Y, Zhang Q, Huang J. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for B-cell malignancies: a systematic review of efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Eur J Haematol. 2016;96:389–396. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen KH, Wada M, Firor AE, et al. Novel anti-CD3 chimeric antigen receptor targeting of aggressive T cell malignancies. Oncotarget. 2016;7:56219. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Turtle CJ, Riddell SR, Maloney DG. CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell immunotherapy for B-cell malignancies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016;100:252–258. doi: 10.1002/cpt.392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Topalian SL, Drake CG, Pardoll DM. Immune checkpoint blockade: a common denominator approach to cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:450–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Garetto S, Sardi C, Morone D, Kallikourdis M (2016) Chemokines and T cell trafficking into tumors: strategies to enhance recruitment of T cells into tumors. In: Defects in T cell trafficking and resistance to Cancer immunotherapy. Springer, pp 163–177
  • 19.Donnadieu E (2016) Defects in T cell trafficking and resistance to Cancer immunotherapy. Springer
  • 20.Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW, Knittel JG, Yan L, Rueden CT, White JG, Keely PJ. Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression. BMC Med. 2008;6:11. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-6-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Conklin MW, Eickhoff JC, Riching KM, Pehlke CA, Eliceiri KW, Provenzano PP, Friedl A, Keely PJ. Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:1221–1232. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2010.11.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Salmon H, Franciszkiewicz K, Damotte D, Dieu-Nosjean MC, Validire P, Trautmann A, Mami-Chouaib F, Donnadieu E. Matrix architecture defines the preferential localization and migration of T cells into the stroma of human lung tumors. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:899–910. doi: 10.1172/JCI45817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Levental KR, Yu H, Kass L, Lakins JN, Egeblad M, Erler JT, Fong SFT, Csiszar K, Giaccia A, Weninger W, Yamauchi M, Gasser DL, Weaver VM. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell. 2009;139:891–906. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Barcus CE, Keely PJ, Eliceiri KW, Schuler LA. Stiff collagen matrices increase tumorigenic prolactin signaling in breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:12722–12732. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.447631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nishio N, Diaconu I, Liu H, et al. Armed oncolytic virus enhances immune functions of chimeric antigen receptor--modified T cells in solid tumors. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zheng Y, Dou Y, Duan L, Cong C, Gao A, Lai Q, Sun Y. Using chemo-drugs or irradiation to break immune tolerance and facilitate immunotherapy in solid cancer. Cell Immunol. 2015;294:54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2015.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kershaw MH, Wang G, Westwood JA, Pachynski RK, Tiffany HL, Marincola FM, Wang E, Young HA, Murphy PM, Hwu P. Redirecting migration of T cells to chemokine secreted from tumors by genetic modification with CXCR2. Hum Gene Ther. 2002;13:1971–1980. doi: 10.1089/10430340260355374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Craddock JA, Lu A, Bear A, et al (2010) Enhanced tumor trafficking of GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. J Immunother (Hagerstown, Md 1997) 33:780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Di Stasi A, De Angelis B, Rooney CM, et al. T lymphocytes coexpressing CCR4 and a chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD30 have improved homing and antitumor activity in a Hodgkin tumor model. Blood. 2009;113:6392–6402. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cantor JM, Rose DM, Slepak M, Ginsberg MH. Fine-tuning tumor immunity with integrin trans-regulation. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:661–667. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Murphy G, Nagase H. Progress in matrix metalloproteinase research. Mol Asp Med. 2008;29:290–308. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nagase H (2001) Substrate specificity of MMPs. In: Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in Cancer therapy. Springer, pp 39–66
  • 33.Shay G, Lynch CC, Fingleton B. Moving targets: emerging roles for MMPs in cancer progression and metastasis. Matrix Biol. 2015;44:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol cell Biol. 2007;8:221–233. doi: 10.1038/nrm2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mendes O, Kim H-T, Stoica G. Expression of MMP2, MMP9 and MMP3 in breast cancer brain metastasis in a rat model. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2005;22:237–246. doi: 10.1007/s10585-005-8115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gutiérrez-Fernández A, Fueyo A, Folgueras AR, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 functions as a metastasis suppressor through modulation of tumor cell adhesion and invasion. Cancer Res. 2008;68:2755–2763. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Decock J, Hendrickx W, Thirkettle S, Gutiérrez-Fernández A, Robinson SD, Edwards DR. Pleiotropic functions of the tumor-and metastasis-suppressing matrix metalloproteinase-8 in mammary cancer in MMTV-PyMT transgenic mice. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:38. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0545-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Soria-Valles C, Gutiérrez-Fernández A, Guiu M, Mari B, Fueyo A, Gomis RR, López-Otín C. The anti-metastatic activity of collagenase-2 in breast cancer cells is mediated by a signaling pathway involving decorin and miR-21. Oncogene. 2014;33:3054–3063. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Rupp LJ, Schumann K, Roybal KT, et al (2017) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Sci Rep 7:737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.John LB, Kershaw MH, Darcy PK. Blockade of PD-1 immunosuppression boosts CAR T-cell therapy. Oncoimmunology. 2013;2:e26286. doi: 10.4161/onci.26286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cancer Microenvironment are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

RESOURCES