Uniform intratumoral distribution of radioactivity produced using two different radioagents, ⁶⁴Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, improves therapeutic efficacy in a small animal tumor model

Abstract

Background

The present study proposed a new concept for targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) to improve the intratumoral distribution of radioactivity using two different radiopharmaceuticals. We examined the efficacy of a combination of a tetrameric cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp (cRGD) peptide-based radiopharmaceutical, ⁶⁴Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ (⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, an α_Vβ₃ integrin [α_Vβ₃] tracer), and ⁶⁴Cu-diacetyl-bis (N⁴-methylthiosemicarbazone) (⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, a supposed tracer for hypoxic metabolism) in a small animal tumor model.

Results

Mice with subcutaneous α_Vβ₃-positive U87MG glioblastoma xenografts were used. The intratumoral distribution of a near-infrared dye, Cy5.5-labeled RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ (Cy5.5-RaftRGD), ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM was visualized by fluorescence imaging and autoradiography of the co-injected Cy5.5-RaftRGD with ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD or ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM at 3 h postinjection. Mice were treated with a single intravenous dose of the vehicle solution (control), 18.5 or 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD or ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or a combination (18.5 MBq of each agent). The tumor volume, tumor cell proliferation, body weight, survival, and tumor and organ uptake of radiopharmaceuticals were assessed. It was shown that Cy5.5-RaftRGD colocalized with ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and could be used as a surrogate for the radioactive agent. The intratumoral distribution of Cy5.5-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM was discordant and nearly complementary, indicating a more uniform distribution of radioactivity achievable with the combined use of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM. Neither ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD nor ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM showed significant effects on tumor growth at 18.5 MBq. The combination of both (18.5 MBq each) showed sustained inhibitory effects against tumor growth and tumor cell proliferation and prolonged the survival of the mice, compared to that by either single agent at 37 MBq. Interestingly, the uptake of the combination by the tumor was higher than that of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD alone, but lower than that of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM alone. The kidneys showed the highest uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, whereas the liver exhibited the highest uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM. No obvious adverse effects were observed in all treated mice.

Conclusions

The combination of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM achieved an improved antitumor effect owing to the more uniform intratumoral distribution of radioactivity. Thus, combining different radiopharmaceuticals to improve the intratumoral distribution would be a promising concept for more effective and safer TRT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0407-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) is a promising cancer treatment modality, which is implemented by systemic administration of a specific targeting vehicle, such as an antibody, peptide, and small organic molecule, that is radiolabeled with an α- or β⁻-particle emitter or Auger electron emitter to deliver a cytocidal radiation dose to both the primary and metastatic lesions [1]. However, the intrinsically heterogeneous biological properties of tumors would lead to heterogeneous intratumoral distribution of the TRT agent. Thus, delivering sufficient radiation throughout the entire tumor to achieve a greater treatment efficacy remains challenging. If we could find a therapeutic option that could achieve homogeneous intratumoral distribution of radionuclides, this might improve the therapeutic efficacy. There are many types of TRT agents that can target various biological properties; combining different agents may achieve a homogeneous distribution of radionuclides, resulting in delivery of sufficient radiation throughout the entire tumor.

⁶⁴Cu is a promising theranostic radionuclide owing to its suitable half-life (12.7 h) with multiple decay modes, including β⁺ (18%), which is used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, β⁻ (39%, 0.95−1.4 mm tissue range) [2], and Auger electron (43%, ~ 126 nm tissue range) [3], which are used for therapeutic radiation. We previously developed a tetrameric cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp (cRGD) peptide-based radiopharmaceutical, ⁶⁴Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ (⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD) [4] for targeting α_Vβ₃ integrin (α_Vβ₃), a transmembrane glycoprotein receptor that is highly expressed on both the angiogenic endothelial and tumor cells and plays important roles in tumor growth, invasion, metastasis, and angiogenesis [5, 6]. Our previous studies showed that ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD PET could detect α_Vβ₃-positive tumors and angiogenesis, as well as monitor the antiangiogenic effects [4, 7, 8]; in addition, we showed the therapeutic efficacy of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD as an α_Vβ₃-targeted radionuclide therapy [9]. Moreover, we focused on another Cu(II)-based theranostic agent, ⁶⁴Cu-diacetyl-bis (N⁴-methylthiosemicarbazone) (⁶⁴Cu-ATSM), which supposedly accumulates in regions of hypoxic metabolism within the tumor [10, 11]. As a neutral lipophilic small molecule with high membrane permeability and low redox potential, Cu-ATSM was designed to release Cu(I) ions within cells under over-reduced conditions (such as hypoxia) but not under normal conditions, leading to selective intracellular trapping of Cu(I) ions [12]. Clinical PET studies showed the association between the tumor uptake of ^60//62/64Cu-ATSM and therapeutic resistance, metastatic potential, and poor prognosis [10, 11]; in addition, preclinical studies using animal tumor models showed the antineoplastic activity of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM [13–15].

Considering that ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM most likely accumulate in different regions of the tumor, with the former accumulating in regions of angiogenesis (toward a normoxic state), and the latter accumulating in regions of hypoxic metabolism, and that angiogenesis and hypoxic metabolism may co-exist since both are common biological features of solid malignancy [16, 17], we hypothesized that a more uniform radioactivity distribution could be achieved via co-injection of the two agents into the tumor. Herein, we aimed to address a new concept for TRT to improve the intratumoral radioactivity distribution using two different radiopharmaceuticals, by studying the combined use of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM in an α_Vβ₃-positive tumor mouse model.

Methods

Radiopharmaceuticals and peptide probe

⁶⁴Cu was produced at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences facility (Chiba, Japan) with a molar activity of 1.77 ± 1.17 TBq/μmol and a radionuclidic purity of > 99.9% [18]. ⁶⁴Cu labeling of cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ and H₂ATSM was performed, as previously described [4, 19] (brief description in Additional file 1). ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD was produced with a molar activity of 148 MBq/nmol and radiochemical purity of > 99.5%. The radiochemical purity of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM was > 95%. A near-infrared dye, Cy5.5-conjugated RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄ (Cy5.5-RaftRGD) was also prepared, as previously described [20].

The two radioagents were mixed at a radioactivity ratio of 1:1, kept at room temperature, and analyzed using a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography system, as described in Additional file 1 for determination of the co-administration mode (simultaneously or sequentially).

As previously reported [9, 21], for in vivo use, ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD was formulated in a vehicle solution of normal saline containing 1% Tween 80 to improve the peptide solubility, Gelofusine® (80 mg/kg, Braun Medical, Oss, Netherlands), and l-lysine (400 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich, Buchs, Switzerland) to reduce the renal retention of the tracer (by > 50%). ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM was diluted with normal saline only [22].

Animals and tumor model

Animal procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (Chiba, Japan) and were conducted in accordance with the institutional guidelines. The α_Vβ₃-positive tumor model was induced by subcutaneous inoculation of 5 × 10⁶ U87MG human glioblastoma cells (American type culture collection) into the right flank of female BALB/cAJcl-nu/nu mice (5 weeks old, CLEA Japan, Inc.), as previously reported [9]. The size of the tumor mass was measured with a digital caliper, tumor volume (mm³) was determined using the following formula: tumor volume = 0.5 × length × width², and the tumor growth ratio was calculated by dividing the obtained value by the initial tumor volume measured immediately before treatment (day 0). Unless otherwise stated, the mice that had a median body weight value of 21 g (range, 19−23 g) and developed tumors of approximately 100 mm³ at 14 days post-tumor cell inoculation were used for subsequent studies. The humane survival endpoint of mice was determined when the tumor size exceeded 1500 mm³ [9]. It should be emphasized that all animal experiments performed in the present study including those presented in additional files were designed to use the same strain, sex, and age of mice obtained from the same company as abovementioned, and the tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into groups for subsequent studies.

Intratumoral distribution of radiopharmaceuticals

Mice were pretreated (via the tail vein) with 37 MBq (0.25 nmol) of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, and 10 min later, 20 nmol of Cy5.5-RaftRGD was injected (to avoid competitive blocking). Another group of mice bearing tumors of various sizes were co-injected with 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and 20 nmol of Cy5.5-RaftRGD. At 3 h postinjection (p.i.), the mice were euthanized and tumors were excised. Autoradiography, fluorescence microscopic examination, and hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining were sequentially performed using the same tumor frozen sections. In addition, autoradiography, immunofluorescence staining of the microvascular marker, CD31, and HE staining were performed using adjacent sections. See Additional file 1 for the detailed procedures. The staining for α_Vβ₃ and a hypoxia marker was omitted because previous studies have shown the colocalization of α_Vβ₃ staining and ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD distribution in the tumor model used here [9] and the correlation of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM uptake with the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (a protein of cellular response to hypoxia) in human tumors [23] and xenografts [24].

Therapeutic experiments

Mice (n = 5−6/group) were treated with a single administration of the vehicle solution (control), 18.5 or 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD (0.125 and 0.25 nmol for 18.5 and 37 MBq, respectively) or ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (2.5 and 5 nmol for 18.5 and 37 MBq, respectively), or a combination of both at a dose of 18.5 MBq for each agent (radioactivity ratio = 1:1, for the simplicity of study design). Then, the body weight of mice and tumor size were measured every 2 days, and the survival endpoint days (as defined above) were recorded.

In a separate experiment, mice (n = 4/group) were treated with 111 or 148 MBq of the combination to see if the use of higher doses (enhancing the radiation energy) can cause more effective antitumor effect (inducing tumor shrinkage compared to the tumor size before treatment). Hematology and hepatorenal function tests were carried out for toxicity evaluation, as described in Additional file 1.

Biodistribution study

Mice (n = 5/group) were treated with 0.74 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD (0.25 nmol), ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (5 nmol), or the combination (0.125 nmol of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD plus 2.5 nmol of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM). The “nmol” amounts indicated above were the values adjusted to those used for the 37 MBq therapy protocols. At 3 and 24 h p.i., the mice were euthanized, and the blood, tumor, muscles, liver, and kidneys were collected and measured using a gamma counter with decay correction. Tumor and organ uptake was expressed as the percentage of injected radioactivity per gram of tissue (%IA/g) normalized to 20 g body weight by multiplying with the ratio of body weight to 20 g.

Histological evaluation of tumor proliferation

Mice (n = 3−4/group at each time point) were injected with the vehicle solution or 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or the combination. At 1 and 3 days p.i., the mice were euthanized and tumors were excised for immunohistochemical staining of the proliferation marker, Ki67. As previously described [9], the proliferation index was defined as the percentage of Ki67-positive cells, which was quantified by counting five areas (× 40 objective lens) of highest Ki67 staining intensity using the WinROOF 2015 image analysis software (version: 3.10.0, Mitani Corporation, Fukui, Japan). See Additional file 1 for the detailed procedures.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative data were presented as the means ± standard deviations. Unpaired t test and one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test were used for two-group and multiple comparisons, respectively (Kaleida Graph 4.0). Based on the period from day 0 p.i. to the specified survival endpoint day, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted, and the differences in survival were evaluated using the log-rank test (GraphPad Prism 5). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Radiopharmaceuticals

⁶⁴Cu-ATSM could be analyzed using the chromatography system established for ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD analysis (Fig. 1a). The same method was used for analysis of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM mixed at equal amounts of radioactivity. The chromatograms obtained immediately after mixing and after 1-h storage at room temperature showed two nearly identical radioactivity peaks corresponding to ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (Fig. 1b). The obtained chromatogram after overnight (18 h) incubation showed a decrease in the radioactivity peak of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, compared to that of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD (Fig. 1b), whereas no obvious change was detected for ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM alone at the same time (Fig. 1a). These results showed the high stability of both ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM in their mixture for at least 1 h, indicating that the two radioagents were co-administrable without obvious drug-drug interactions within 1 h after mixing the two agents.

Fig. 1.

Representative chromatograms of a ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM labeling mixture immediately after the radiolabeling reaction (T₀) or after 18 h of storage at room temperature (T = 18 h), and b the mixture of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM immediately after mixing (T₀) or after 1 and 18 h of storage at room temperature (T = 1, 18 h)

Intratumoral distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM

Figure 2a shows well-matched distribution patterns of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and Cy5.5-RaftRGD in two tumor sections. This finding validated the feasibility of the use of Cy5.5-RaftRGD, as a representative of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, to discriminate the spatial distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD from that of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM in the same tumor. Figure 2b–g shows a series of images acquired on the same tumor section; ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM autoradiograph (green), fluorescence image of Cy5.5-RaftRGD (red), and HE micrograph. The “green” HE (Fig. 2d) and “red” HE (Fig. 2f) merged images show discordant distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and Cy5.5-RaftRGD. Higher levels of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM radioactivity were observed in the outer regions of the tumor, whereas Cy5.5-RaftRGD accumulated mainly in the inner regions. The “green,” “red,” and HE merged images (Fig. 2g) further suggested the complementary distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and Cy5.5-RaftRGD, despite limited overlaps (yellow). Except for the necrotic area, Cy5.5-RaftRGD generally accumulated in the regions showing low ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM accumulation and vice versa. Similar results were also found in the other five tumors of various sizes (50−1065 mm³, see Additional file 2). An autoradiographed slice adjacent to the one shown in Fig. 2b was further examined by CD31 and HE staining. As shown in Additional file 3, CD31-stained microvessels were extensively observed in both the high and low ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM regions; however, their size was generally smaller in the high ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM regions than in the low ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM regions.

Fig. 2.

a Well-matched intratumoral distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and Cy5.5-RaftRGD. Mice bearing U87MG tumors were pre-injected with 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, injected 10 min later with 20 nmol of Cy5.5-RaftRGD, and euthanized at 3 h p.i. Autoradiography and fluorescence imaging were sequentially performed in the same tumor section. Left panels, ⁶⁴Cu autoradiograms; right panels, Cy5.5 fluorescence acquired using the Odyssey CLx near-infrared fluorescence imaging system. b−g A representative tumor section showing distribution of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and Cy5.5-RaftRGD. U87MG tumor-bearing mice were co-injected with ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and Cy5.5-RaftRGD and euthanized at 3 h p.i. Autoradiography, fluorescence imaging, and HE staining were sequentially performed in the same tumor section. b HE staining; c ⁶⁴Cu autoradiogram in green; d Merged image of b and c; e Cy5.5 fluorescence in red; f Merged image of b and e; g Merged image of b, c, and e. Yellow, red/green overlay. The necrotic region is marked by a dotted line. Scale bar, 2 mm

Radiotherapy with ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and a combination of both

Neither ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD nor ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM showed significant effects on the tumor growth at 18.5 MBq (Additional file 4). Figure 3a and Additional file 5a shows the tumor growth curves of mice treated with the same total radioactivity dose (37 MBq) of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or a combination (18.5 MBq of each agent). No significant difference was found in the initial tumor volumes among the groups. From day 3 to 9 p.i., all treatments at 37 MBq resulted in a significant delay of tumor growth, compared to the vehicle-treated control: for example, on day 9, the tumor volumes were 117 ± 33 mm³ (P = 0.0018), 126 ± 20 mm³ (P = 0.006), and 87 ± 13 mm³ (P < 0.0001) for ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and combination groups, respectively, vs. 189 ± 46 mm³ for the control group. From day 12 to 20, only the combination maintained the significant tumor growth-delaying effects: for example, on day 12, the tumor volumes were 233 ± 78 mm³ (P > 0.05), 208 ± 26 mm³ (P > 0.05), and 129 ± 42 mm³ (P = 0.004) for ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and combination groups, respectively, vs. 275 ± 102 mm³ for the control group. Furthermore, the endpoint survival analysis (Fig. 3b) showed that the median survival days of the control, ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and combination groups were 21, 22.5, 23, and 29, respectively. The combination group exhibited significantly prolonged survival, compared to the control, ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM groups. Changes in body weight were also compared among groups (Additional file 5b). The mice treated with either ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD or ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM alone showed slightly but significantly lower body weights on day 3, compared to the control mice, whereas no significant body weight loss was observed for the combination group.

Fig. 3.

Tumor growth curves (a) and Kaplan-Meier endpoint-survival curves (b) of U87MG tumor-bearing mice after single injection of the vehicle solution (control) or 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or a combination (18.5 MBq for each agent). n = 6/group; ^*P < 0.01 and ^†P < 0.05 for the combination group vs. control group and vs. ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD or ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM group, respectively

In comparison with the 37 MBq combination (Additional file 6a), increasing the total radioactivity dose of the combination to 111−148 MBq induced significant tumor shrinkage in a dose-dependent manner (Additional file 6b); additionally, it did not cause a marked or long-lasting body weight loss (Additional file 6c). The 148 MBq-treated mice showed a maximal mean body weight reduction of 9.9% (less than 10%) on day 6, compared to day 0 (baseline), and afterwards the body weight gradually recovered beyond the baseline. Measurement of hematology and hepatorenal functions (Additional file 7) did not show a dose-response relationship between the 111 and 148 MBq doses. All the values obtained on day 21 after treatment were not significantly different from those measured in the control mice.

Histological study of tumor proliferation

Results of the histological analysis of cell proliferation, evaluated by Ki67 staining, in the treated and control tumors are presented in Fig. 4. On day 1 p.i. of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or the combination at 37 MBq, all treated tumors showed a significant reduction of the proliferation index (the percentage of Ki67-positive cells), compared to the vehicle-treated control. The proliferation index of the combination-treated tumors was generally smaller than that of either single agent-treated tumors; a statistically significant difference was observed between the combination and ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD groups; however, the difference between the combination and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM groups did not reach statistical significance. On day 3 p.i., only the combination-treated tumors continued to exhibit a significantly reduced proliferation index.

Fig. 4.

Ki67 staining (dark brown) of the tumor sections at days 1 and 3 p.i. of the vehicle solution (control) or 37 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, or a combination (18.5 MBq for each agent). a Representative images at day 1. Scale bar, 50 μm. Nuclei were lightly stained with hematoxylin (blue). b Quantitative analysis of Ki67 staining (the percentage of positively stained cells). n = 3−4/group; ^{*, †, ‡, §}P < 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively; ^║P > 0.05

Biodistribution of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and a combination of both

The biodistribution data obtained at 3 and 24 h p.i. of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD (0.74 MBq), ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (0.74 MBq), or a combination (0.37 MBq of each agent) are summarized in Table 1. Data represented the tumor and organ uptake levels from the therapeutic dose (37 MBq) because the same peptide or ATSM dose was used. ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM exhibited rapid blood clearance and low levels of activity in the muscles. The highest radioactivity accumulation was found in the kidneys followed by the liver for ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, and in the liver followed by the kidneys for ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM. The tumor uptake levels of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM were higher than those of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD in the U87MG tumor model. The two agents showed similar biodistribution kinetics. From 3 to 24 h p.i., the blood, liver, kidney, muscle, and tumor uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD decreased by 20, 33, 29, 40, and 23%, respectively. Nearly similar results were observed for ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (20, 39, 17, 14, and 39%, respectively). The tumor and organ uptake values of the combination were very close to the average of the values of the two single agents. Tumor uptake at 3 and 24 h was 1.6- and 1.4-fold higher for the combination (10.7 ± 1.05 and 7.02 ± 1.20 %IA/g) than ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD (6.69 ± 0.64 and 5.18 ± 0.24 %IA/g), respectively. However, it was 1.4- and 1.3-fold lower than that of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (15.5 ± 2.03 and 9.47 ± 0.78 %IA/g, respectively).

Table 1.

Biodistribution of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and a combination of both in U87MG tumor-bearing mice

Organ	3 h p.i.				24 h p.i.
	64Cu-RaftRGD (a)	64Cu-ATSM (b)	Combination	(“a” + “b”)/2	64Cu-RaftRGD (a)	64Cu-ATSM (b)	Combination	(“a” + “b”)/2
Blood	0.05 ± 0.01	2.1 ± 0.12	1.15 ± 0.14*a, *b	1.08	0.04 ± 0.01	1.68 ± 0.15	0.83 ± 0.06*a, *b	0.86
Liver	8.06 ± 0.56	19.9 ± 1.41	12.8 ± 0.42*a, *b	14	5.43 ± 0.27	12.1 ± 0.69	8.48 ± 0.28*a, *b	8.77
Kidneys	11.8 ± 0.86	8.38 ± 0.49	9.55 ± 0.79†a, §b	10.1	8.42 ± 0.61	6.98 ± 0.34	7.18 ± 0.38‡a,║b	7.7
Muscles	0.4 ± 0.06	0.73 ± 0.06	0.57 ± 0.06†a, ‡b	0.57	0.24 ± 0.04	0.63 ± 0.05	0.46 ± 0.06*a, †b	0.44
Tumor	6.69 ± 0.64	15.5 ± 2.03	10.7 ± 1.05‡a, †b	11	5.18 ± 0.24	9.47 ± 0.78	7.02 ± 1.2‡a, ‡b	7.33

Tissue radioactivity was assessed at 3 and 24 h p.i. and expressed as %IA/g. n = 5/group; ^{*a, †a, ‡a}P < 0.0001, 0.001, and 0.01, respectively vs. the ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD group; ^{*b, †b, ‡b, §b}P < 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively or ^║bP > 0.05 vs. the ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM group

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, the present proof-of-concept study is the first to report the use of a combination of different radiopharmaceuticals to improve the heterogeneous intratumoral distribution of radionuclides and enhance the therapeutic efficacy. So far, the most commonly used strategy to improve the efficacy of TRT involves its combination with other treatment modalities, such as chemotherapy and external radiotherapy [25].

It is of great importance to determine a suitable co-administration mode (simultaneous or sequential) for combination of different drugs owing to the possibility of in vitro and in vivo drug-drug interactions, as well as the difference in biopharmacokinetics of the drugs. In the present study, we selected the simultaneous mode based on the results of the chromatographic analysis of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM mixture, which did not indicate any radioagent-radioagent reaction, such as transchelation (owing to the potentially different ⁶⁴Cu-coordinating ability of the two agents) within 1 h after mixing the two agents. In addition, our previous data did not show different biodistribution patterns of the two radiopharmaceuticals [21, 22]. In addition, the results of the present biodistribution study using the same experimental settings further showed no radioagent-radioagent reactions in vivo, as evidenced by the fact that the measured tumor and organ uptake values for the co-injected ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM were approximately equal to the average values of those obtained for the single agents.

Expectedly, the intratumoral distribution study showed spatially discordant but complementary distribution patterns of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM in the α_Vβ₃-positive U87MG tumor xenograft, which resulted in a more uniform radioactivity distribution in the tumors co-injected with the two agents. Immunostaining with CD31 revealed that the regions of high ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and low ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD accumulation were enriched with relatively smaller microvessels than the regions of low ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and high ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD accumulation. This difference in the microvasculature indicated the complementary relationship between ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM and ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD accumulation according to the intratumoral vascularization levels, which is in accordance with our proof of concept in the present study.

In the subsequent therapeutic study, despite using the same total radioactivity dose (37 MBq), the combined use of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM (18.5 MBq of each agent) was more efficient in maintaining its inhibitory effects against tumor growth and tumor cell proliferation and prolonging the survival of mice than either single agent. At a dose of 18.5 MBq, neither ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD nor ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM showed significant effects on tumor growth. Hence, these results might indicate a synergistic antitumor effect between ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM. We further examined the total tumor radioactivity uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD, ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM, and the combination at the therapeutic dose. Lower tumor uptake values were observed for the more effective combination therapy (10.7 ± 1.05 and 7.02 ± 1.20 %IA/g at 3 and 24 h, respectively), compared to the corresponding values of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM alone (15.5 ± 2.03 and 9.47 ± 0.78 %IA/g, respectively), indicating no decisive correlation between the tumor uptake and antitumor effects. Taken together, results of the intratumoral distribution, total tumor uptake levels, and therapeutic effects suggested that the improved antitumor effects of the combination therapy could be largely attributed to the improved intratumoral radioactivity distribution. Regarding the therapeutic efficacy of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD plus ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM combination, a dose-response relationship was revealed; a total dose of 37 MBq induced tumor growth delay, whereas higher doses (111 and 148 MBq) caused tumor growth inhibition. It should be mentioned that to simplify the experiment schedules, the mice were treated with only one single-dose injection, but despite this, significant tumor growth delay and promising results of tumor growth inhibition were achieved by the combination with the total doses of 37 MBq and 111−148 MBq, respectively. Actually, in clinical settings, TRT as well as other treatment modalities such as chemotherapy and external radiotherapy are administered or performed multiple times to obtain the most effective therapeutic efficacy. Thus, it may be anticipated that multiple-dose regimen of the combined TRT with ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM could greatly improve the treatment effectiveness.

For TRT, the presence of dose-limiting organs usually restricts the administered activity levels of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Radiopharmaceuticals considered for combined use should have different critical organ profiles, which may lower the risk of dose-limiting toxicity and widen the therapeutic window. Previous studies showed that the kidneys constitute the principal dose-limiting organ for ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD therapy [9], whereas the liver, red marrow, and ovaries are the dose-limiting organs for ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM therapy [22]. In the present study, the kidneys exhibited the highest tissue uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD followed by the liver, whereas the liver showed the highest tissue uptake of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM followed by the kidneys. Throughout the study (up to 3−4 weeks after treatment), we did not observe any serious side effects even in the mice treated with the highest dose (148 MBq; 74 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD plus 74 MBq of ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM). Our previous study showed that ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM at 148 MBq caused hematological toxicity, which might be related to the resultant poor survival of the treated mice [15]. Although further long-term evaluation of safety is needed, the combination therapy has the potential to be safer, compared to dose escalation of a single agent.

So far, only few studies have reported the combined use of different radiopharmaceuticals for TRT [26]. Previous studies performed TRT of neuroendocrine tumors via the combined use of high-energy and long-path ⁹⁰Y-somatostatin analog with its medium energy and short path ¹⁷⁷Lu analog for combating tumors of various sizes [27], or with ¹³¹I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (a norepinephrine analog) for increasing the dose delivered to the tumor site [28]. Different from their treatment concepts, the present study suggested the combination of different radiopharmaceuticals (may not be limited to the currently used agents) to improve the intratumoral radioactivity distribution and thus enhance the therapeutic efficacy. Despite different concepts, all combined TRT treatments might have a common advantage: allowance of personalized and optimized dose calculation for each radiopharmaceutical based on the dosimetric data and spatial distribution in the tumor obtained from separate PET scans because many TRT agents or their surrogates are also PET tracers.

The performance of the proposed newly designed treatment concept should be evaluated in further studies using various tumor models and, if possible, different combinations of radioagents with optimized doses for each single agent to maximize the therapeutic efficacy. Another limitation of the present study is the lack of information on the radiation absorbed dose distribution in tumors, which might be more directly related to the tumor response. However, to obtain these data, a sophisticated three-dimensional dose calculation technique would be needed [29].

Conclusions

In conclusion, the combined use of two different radioagents, ⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD and ⁶⁴Cu-ATSM with discordant intratumoral distribution patterns resulted in a more uniform intratumoral radioactivity distribution, resulting in an improved antitumor effect. Combining different radiopharmaceuticals to improve the intratumoral distribution would be a promising concept for more effective and safer TRT.

Abbreviations

α_Vβ₃

α_Vβ₃ integrin

%IA/g

Percentage of injected radioactivity per gram of tissue

⁶⁴Cu-ATSM

⁶⁴Cu-diacetyl-bis (N⁴-methylthiosemicarbazone)

⁶⁴Cu-RaftRGD

⁶⁴Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄

cRGD

Cyclic Arg-Gly-Asp

Cy5.5-RaftRGD

Cy5.5-labeled RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)₄

HE

Hematoxylin and eosin

p.i.

Postinjection

PET

Positron emission tomography

TRT

Targeted radionuclide therapy

Authors’ contributions

ZHJ and ABT conceived and designed the present study. ZHJ, ABT, YF, and DB developed methodology. ZHJ, MD, AS, KN, and MRZ acquired the data. ZHJ, ABT, MD, and YY analyzed and interpreted the data. MD, YY, KN, PD, and DB provided the technical and material support. AS and MRZ provided administrative and material support. ZHJ created the figures and tables, drafted and revised the manuscript. ABT, YF, PD, DB, and TH reviewed and revised the manuscript. ABT and TH supervised the overall project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval

The animal experiments in this study were performed in accordance with institutional and national guidelines regarding animal care and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (Chiba, Japan). This article does not describe any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.