Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2018 Jun 19;8:9350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27548-1

Cell wall associated protein TasA provides an initial binding component to extracellular polysaccharides in dual-species biofilm

Danielle Duanis-Assaf 1,2, Tal Duanis-Assaf 3, Guanghong Zeng 4, Rikke Louise Meyer 4, Meital Reches 3, Doron Steinberg 2, Moshe Shemesh 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6008451  PMID: 29921978

Abstract

Many bacteria in biofilm surround themselves by an extracellular matrix composed mainly of extracellular polysaccharide (EP), proteins such as amyloid-like fibers (ALF) and nucleic acids. While the importance of EP in attachment and acceleration of biofilm by a number of different bacterial species is well established, the contribution of ALF to attachment in multispecies biofilm remains unknown. The study presented here aimed to investigate the role of TasA, a precursor for ALF, in cell-cell interactions in dual-species biofilms of Bacillus subtilis and Streptococcus mutans. Expression of major B. subtilis matrix operons was significantly up-regulated in the presence of S. mutans during different stages of biofilm formation, suggesting that the two species interacted and modulated gene expression in each other. Wild-type B. subtilis expressing TasA adhered strongly to S. mutans biofilm, while a TasA-deficient mutant was less adhesive and consequently less abundant in the dual-species biofilm. Dextran, a biofilm polysaccharide, induced aggregation of B. subtilis and stimulated adhesion to S. mutans biofilms. This effect was only observed in the wild-type strain, suggesting that interactions between TasA and dextran-associated EP plays an important role in inter-species interactions during initial stages of multispecies biofilm development.

Introduction

Biofilm is defined as a complex structure of microorganisms adhering to each other and/or to surfaces, embedded in an extracellular matrix1. The variety of species and their relative abundance dictates the overall properties of the biofilm in terms of stress tolerance and virulence potential2.

The extracellular matrix, mostly produced by the microorganisms themselves, consists of different types of biopolymers that form the biofilm’s three-dimensional architecture, and is responsible for adhesion to surfaces and for cohesion within the biofilm3. The matrix mainly consists of polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids and lipids1.

In many bacteria, extracellular polysaccharides (EP) are indispensable for biofilm formation4,5. Moreover, in multispecies biofilms the presence of species that produce EP may lead to the integration of other species even if they do not synthesize matrix polymers themselves6.

Recent studies have shown that many biofilm-producing microorganisms can produce amyloid-like fibers (ALF)7. Among these microorganisms are Bacillus subtilis (Romero, Aguilar et al.22), Streptococcus mutans (Oli, Otoo et al. 2012), Escherichia coli8,9, Staphylococcus aureus9 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa10. Although the role of ALF in mono-species biofilm formation has been studied before, its role in multispecies microbial communities remains unclear11.

The dental biofilm is a classic example of diverse, complex multispecies biofilm. It appears that one of the most predominant class in the oral biofilm is bacilli12. Both, B. subtilis and S. mutans belong to the class of bacilli and are used as model organisms for studying biofilm formation. While, S. mutans is an oral bacterium, B. subtilis is mainly considered as a soil bacterium. However, B. subtilis was isolated from different areas associated with the dental environment13,14. Though, association of B. subtilis to dental diseases remains unclear13,14.

S. mutans is considered a primary causative bacterium of dental caries. S. mutans’ virulence is due to its capability to form biofilms on the tooth surface15. Following initial adhesion, dietary sucrose is metabolized and transformed into glucans or fructans. These polysaccharides either serve as EP or remain associated with the cell as intracellular polysaccharides15,16.

B. subtilis is a Gram-positive non-pathogenic bacterium. When biofilm formation is triggered, B. subtilis cells stick together by producing an extracellular matrix17. The matrix primarily consists of EP synthesized by the products of the epsA-O operon, and ALF encoded by tasA located in the tapA-sipW-tasA operon18. The importance of TasA in a mono-species biofilm setting was described previously, both in cell-cell interactions19 and biofilm formation20. In the mono-species setting, TasA is required for development of complex colony architecture21 and provides a structure that can hold the cells together22. It is not yet known if TasA is responsible for similar interactions between different species of bacteria in a multi-species biofilm.

In the present study, S. mutans and B. subtilis were selected as model bacteria for investigating interactions of dual-species biofilm formation, and to investigate the interaction between the precursor for ALF -  TasA of B. subtilis and the dextran-associated EP of S. mutans. Dextran is a typical polymer found in biofilm extracellular matrix23,24, moreover, due to being a glucose homo-polymer with α-linkages, it is a relatively simple chemical moiety which may be used as a model for a larger group of glucans23. B. subtilis was chosen for its single gene encoding the TasA. Moreover, both bacteria can be found in the same habitat and therefore interact biologically, which indicated this model can appear in the natural environment. The aims of the current study were to determine the direct interaction between the model bacteria B. subtilis and S. mutans and to identify the role of TasA, a precursor for ALF produced by B. subtilis, in the formation of this co-species biofilm.

Results

B. subtilis and S. mutans form complex structures within dual-species biofilm

The first aim of this study was to determine whether an interaction between B. subtilis and S. mutans cells may result in formation of dual-species biofilm. We compared the morphology of mono and dual-species biofilms using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). S. mutans mono-species biofilm was homogenous and surrounded by EP. B. subtilis mono-species biofilm contained bundles of filamentous cells. The dual-species biofilm had more three-dimensionally complex structures than the mono-species biofilm (Fig. 1, right panel). Moreover, our observations showed close proximity between the rod shaped B. subtilis and the S. mutans cocci (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

formation of complex structures during dual-species biofilm development. S. mutans and B. subtilis were grown in mono or dual-species biofilms. All biofilms were fixed with 4% Formaldehyde. The samples were taken for visualization under SEM. The lower panel is a higher magnification of the upper panel. The pictures represent the mono and dual-species biofilm. The complexity of the dual biofilm in comparison to the mono-species biofilm and the arrangement of both of the bacteria in the dual-species biofilm.

B. subtilis cell initially interacts with S. mutans biofilm via TasA

The co-localization of B. subtilis and S. mutans in the dual-species biofilm indicated a direct interaction between these bacterial cells. To explore this interaction, we quantified adhesion forces between the two species by single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) using an atomic force microscope (AFM). We quantified adhesion forces between single B. subtilis cells and a glass coverslip surface (control sample), a B. subtilis biofilm and a S. mutans biofilm.

The first step was the attachment of a single B. subtilis cell onto a tipless cantilever coated with polydopamine (PDA) (Supplementary Fig. S1). Next, the cantilever was repeatedly approached to and retracted from the test surface to determine the adhesion energy, the maximum adhesion force, and the distance at which the bond ruptures as the cantilever is retracted from the surface (Fig. 2 a1-4). While the force profile of B. subtilis on glass featured weak interactions at short distances, the force profile between a single B. subtilis cell and B. subtilis biofilm showed multiple rupture events at longer distances. The force profiles of B. subtilis cells and S. mutans biofilm showed increasing number of rupture events, higher adhesion force, and longer rupture length, suggesting interaction with multiple adhesins that could be stretched from the cell surface. The strong interaction between B. subtilis and S. mutans was also reflected in the number of adhesion events observed in force spectroscopy analysis. B. subtilis adhered to S. mutans biofilm in 100% of the measured force curves, while up to 40% of force curves showed no adhesion when B. subtilis was approached to a glass surface or a B. subtilis biofilm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

B. subtilis cell interacts with S. mutans biofilm via TasA protein. B. subtilis bacterial cells were incubated on coverslip for 20 minutes until attachment to the glass. One B. subtilis cell was picked and attached to tipless cantilever coated with PDA. Single cell force spectroscopy measurements were taken using AFM. (a) representative force profiles of B. subtilis WT on a glass surface (a-1), B. subtilis WT on a B. subtilis biofilm (a-2), B. subtilis WT on S. mutans biofilm (a-3) and B. subtilis ∆tasA on S. muatns biofilm (a-4). (b) Adhesion force (b-1) and energy (b-2) of single B. subtilis cell to glass, B. subtilis biofilm and S. mutans biofilm. The adhesion force and energy between B. subtilis cell and S. mutans biofilm was significantly higher compare to glass. However, ∆tasA strain did not show a high adhesion force or energy towards S. mutans biofilm. The data are displayed as a mean value ± standard deviation. **P value < 0.01 compared to control.

Adhesion is described by the maximum adhesion force measured between the bacterium and the sample (Fig. 2b-1), and the adhesion energy calculated from the area under the force-distance curve (Fig. 2b-2). The adhesion force between the B. subtilis cell and the B. subtilis biofilm was 2-fold higher than the adhesion force to glass. However, its adhesion force to S. mutans biofilm was 5-fold higher (Fig. 2b). The adhesion force between B. subtilis cells and S. mutans biofilm was so high that it frequently caused detachment of B. subtilis from the cantilever.

It has been established that TasA is a cell wall associated protein that plays a crucial role in B. subtilis’ biofilm formation20. Therefore, the next step was to examine the possible role of TasA in interaction between B. subtilis and other bacteria in mixed-species biofilm. Using SCFS, we were able to measure the initial adhesion force of ΔtasA mutant strain of B. subtilis to S. mutans biofilm. The force profiles obtained for the ΔtasA mutant towards glass (data nor shown) or S. mutans biofilm were similar to those of the WT strain (Fig. 2a-4). However, in contrast to the WT B. subtilis, the ΔtasA mutant showed weak interaction with S. mutans biofilm (Fig. 2b).

TasA affects the structure and the incorporation of B. subtilis into co-species biofilm

Next, confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to observe the three-dimensional structure of dual-species biofilm. In Fig. 3, dextran-associated EP, formed by S. mutans, is labelled with dextran alexa fluor (blue), and B. subtilis cells are tagged with GFP (green). The CLSM images indicate that B. subtilis cells were not only attached to the upper layer of the biofilm but also appear in deeper layers and are surrounded by dextran-associated EP (Fig. 3a). However, B. subtilis ΔtasA cells (green) were less abundant in the dual-species biofilm (Fig. 3b) after 24 hours. B. subtilis (both in WT and ΔtasA) increased in abundance after 48 hours, but ΔtasA remained less abundant than the WT B. subtilis (Fig. 3). These results indicate that TasA contributes to establishment of B. subtilis in co-species biofilm with S. mutans, especially in the initial stages.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

B. subtilis’ TasA protein effects the structure of co-species biofilm and the incorporation of B. subtilis into co-species biofilm. (a) Representing CLSM picture of co-species biofilm. B. subtilis (WT (YC161 marked with GFP) or ΔtasA (marked with GFP) and S. mutans were grown together for 24 h (upper panel) or 48 h (lower panel). S. mutans dextran-associated EP were marked in blue using Alexa fluor 647. In both of the time periods, there are more WT B. subtilis cells among the S. mutans’ dextran-associated EP compare to the ΔtasA strain. Moreover, after 48 h there is an increase in the amount of incorporated B. subtilis cells within the dual-species biofilm in both strains (WT and ΔtasA). (b) Quantification of the fluorescent intensity of GFP for live bacteria and Alexa fluor for EP. The data are displayed as a mean value of data from five biological repeats each performed as triplicate. The amount of WT B. subtilis cells is significantly higher than the ΔtasA strain after 24 and 48 h. Furthermore, there is an increase in the amount of B. subtilis cells within the dual-species biofilm in both of the strains. The data are displayed as a mean value ± standard deviation. *P value < 0.05 compared to WT.

TasA is essential for dextran-induced B. subtilis aggregation

S. mutans’ EP serve as a platform for bacterial adhesion25. Therefore, we tested whether dextran (a primary component in S. mutans’ EP23,26) contributes to the attachment of B. subtilis cells. An aggregation assay showed that addition of increasing concentrations of dextran stimulated aggregate formation by WT cells of B. subtilis by 40–80%, while dextran supplementation could not notably affect the ΔtasA mutant cells (Fig. 4). The strains had similar aggregation ratio in the absence of dextran (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

TasA protein is essential for dextran-induced B. subtilis aggregation. B. subtilis cells were centrifuged and washed twice using aggregation buffer. The bacterial cells were incubated in aggregation buffer supplemented with different concentrations of dextran. O.D (600 nm) measurements were taken every 30 min. Final aggregation percentages were calculated. The data are displayed as a mean value ± standard deviation of data from three biological repeats each performed as duplicates. ANOVA following post-hoc t-test with Bonferroni correction has been conducted. *P value < 0.05 compared to control.

The amount of dextran-associated EP affects incorporation of B. subtilis cells to the dual-species biofilm

To investigate whether dextran affects B. subtilis biofilm formation, we determined if enzymatic removal of dextran during biofilm formation affected the abundance of B. subtilis. We visualised B. subtilis WT cells in dual-species biofilm formed in the presence of different dextranase concentrations. The abundance of B. subtilis biomass decreased in a dose-dependent manner in the dual-species biofilm in response to increasing concentration of dextranase (Fig. 5), suggesting that the quantity of dextran is important for B. subtilis adherence in dual-species biofilm.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

B. subtilis incorporation in the dual-species biofilm is highly dependent on the amount of dextran-associated EP. (a) Representing CLSM picture of co-species biofilm. B. subtilis (YC161 marked with GFP) and S. mutans were grown together for 24 h in the presence of different amounts of dextranase. As the amount of dextranases increased the amount of B. subtilis cells in the co-species biofilm decreased. (b) Quantification of the fluorescent intensity of GFP for B. subtilis cells. The data are displayed as a mean value of data ± standard deviation from two biological repeats each performed as triplicate. The amount of B. subtilis cells in the co-species biofilm significantly decreased in dose dependent manners with the increase in the amount of dextranase. *P value < 0.05 compared to control.

Expression of tapA operon of B. subtilis is up-regulated in the presence of S. mutans

Finally, we aimed to determine whether the presence of S. mutans affects expression of the tapA-sipW-tasA operon. The β galactosidase assay showed approximately 5-fold up-regulation in the activity of the tapA promoter during the first 12 h of co-culture, although the activity decreased over time. S. mutans is a very acidogenic bacterium which produces a high amount of acid during its growth. We therefore tested, if its effect on gene expression was through modifying the pH in the media. A shift in the pH from 7 to 6 up-regulated the tapA promoter activity, although to a lesser extent than the up-regulation observed in the presence of S. mutans (Fig. 6a).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Expression of the tapA and eps operon in B. subtilis are up regulated in the presence of S. mutans. B. subtilis (PtapA-lacZ or Peps-lacZ) cells were grown in the presence or absence of S. mutans cells either in pH7 or in pH6. Samples were collected every 12 hours for β galactosidaze assay. The data are displayed as a mean value ± standard deviation of data from three biological repeats each performed as triplicates. The expression of the tasA and the eps operons was significantly induced in the presence of S. mutans. The expression time of both of the operons was not in parallel. While tasA expression was significantly increased after the first 12 h of incubation, the higher induction in eps expression was after 36 h. *P value < 0.05 compared to B. subtilis pH = 7.

Since ΔtasA mutant appeared in the dual-species biofilm after 24 hours and furthermore, the increase in the amount of the mutant cells after 48 hours indicated that another factor may be involved in the attachment of B. subtilis to the dual-species biofilm. Therefore, the next step was to determine whether the presence of S. mutans affects the expression of the epsA-O operon. The β galactosidase assay showed approximately 2.5-fold up-regulation in the expression of the eps promoter during the first 12 h of co-culture. In contrast to the tapA operon, the highest up-regulation in the eps operon was only after 24 hours. These results indicate that the regulation of both of operons is not stimulated simultaneously in the dual-species biofilm.

Discussion

The current study aimed to explore the role of TasA in the interaction between B. subtilis and S. mutans in dual-species biofilm. Our results point to an important role for interaction between two matrix components - B. subtilis’ TasA protein and S. mutans’ dextran polysaccharides - during dual-species biofilm formation.

Biofilm formation begins with attachment of bacteria to the substrate. Attachment involves initial reversible adhesion, which occurs within seconds to minutes, followed by irreversible adhesion, which results in bacterial aggregation27,28. The high sensitivity and resolution of the AFM allows quantification of adhesion forces of a single bacterial cells to probe the interaction forces that govern initial attachment. Therefore, the initial reversible interaction of B. subtilis and S. mutans cells was determined using SCFS. The low adhesion force between B. subtilis and glass explains the inability of B. subtilis NCIB3610 to adhere to surfaces and to form submerged biofilm at solid-liquid interfaces29. B. subtilis adhered more strongly to B. subtilis biofilm, but its adhesion force to S. mutans biofilm was significantly stronger. The relatively high inter-species adhesion force explains the capability of B. subtilis to form submerged biofilm in cooperation with S. mutans, which more easily colonizes the glass substrate.

The importance of TasA in biofilm formation by B. subtilis is well established in the literature20,22. Additionally, the role of ALF in cell-host adhesion was demonstrated in other bacterial species such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteritidis30,31. We show here that TasA was critical for the interaction between B. subtilis cells to S. mutans biofilm, as a TasA deficient mutant adhered only weakly to S. mutans (Fig. 2) and was less abundant in the dual-species biofilms (Fig. 3).

The role of TasA in the initial formation of dual-species biofilm raised the question of whether the presence of S. mutans affected the expression of tasA. Expression of the tapA-sipW-tasA operon increased in the presence of S. mutans during the first 12 h of co-culture, and subsequently decreased after 36 h, implying that TasA is required in early stages of dual-species biofilm development. Bacteria are known to differentiate into biofilm-forming cells in response to environmental cues32,33. Thus, induction in the expression of tapA-sipW-tasA operon may be triggered by the production of an organic acid(s) by S. mutans and a decrease in pH levels due to sucrose metabolism34,35. Therefore, tapA-sipW-tasA expression was examined in a medium with decreased pH by addition of lactic acid, a major end-product of glycolysis by S. mutans36. The tapA expression was up-regulated at pH 6, indicating a pH-dependent induction of the tapA operon. These results support the findings by Chen et al.37, who found that organic acids stimulate biofilm formation by B. subtilis37.

We hypothesized that TasA interacted with a major matrix component produced by S. mutans, namely dextran. Dextran induced aggregation by B. subtilis cells in a dose dependent manner, and the amount of dextran affected the abundance of B. subtilis cells in the dual-species biofilm. These results are in accordance with previous studies that showed the importance of S. mutans EP in accumulation and adherence of other bacterial species to the biofilm25,38,39. Interestingly, the effect of dextran on B. subtilis aggregation was absent in the ΔtasA mutant suggesting that the interaction between TasA and S. mutans biofilm is due to ALF-EP interaction. This result is supported by Romero et al.22, who suggest that TasA ALF interact in a specific way with EP matrix22 and Besingi et al.40 who suggested that amyloid proteins can be adhesive to glucans40. The aggregation of B. subtilis in the presence of dextran demonstrates the irreversible interactions that occur between the bacteria. Our results support the finding of Diehl et al.41 who suggested, based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, that TasA interacts specifically with EP. Such interactions can explain the strong adhesion of B. subtilis cells to S. mutans biofilm, as well as the reduced adherence of the ∆tasA strain. Moreover, their study showed that EP promotes the restructuring of TasA into ALF, which may explain the increased aggregation of B. subtilis WT in the presence of Dextran41.

A recent study by Besingi et al.40 found amyloid fibers in S. mutans biofilms. However, we did not detect any ALF in the S. mutans biofilms. This could be due to the use of sucrose in the growth media, as glucans formed from sucrose can mask amyloid production40. However, the existence of such fibers may also contribute to the adhesion of more bacterial species and the complexity of the formed biofilm in multispecies settings.

Overall, this study demonstrates that the interaction between TasA produced by B. subtilis and EP produced by S. mutans plays an essential role in initial attachment of bacteria during dual-species biofilm formation. Moreover, we demonstrate the complexity of how each matrix component can influence multispecies biofilm formation. This study provides new insights into ALF contribution to the structural complexity of dual-species biofilm. A clear view of this interaction may result in new approaches to control biofilm formation and adhesion of these specific bacterial species. Moreover, further investigation of the specific active sites on such extracellular matrix components may lead to developing targeted treatments to combat biofilms.

Materials and Methods

Strains and growth media

The cultures of clinical isolate strain S. mutans UA159 were grown overnight in brain heart infusion broth (BHI, Acumedia, Landing, Michigan) at 37 °C in 95% air/5% CO2. The following B. subtilis strains were used in this study: NCIB3610 (WT), YC161 (Pspank-gfp), DDA (∆tasA, Pspank-gfp), RL4582 (PtapA-lacZ) and BS505 (∆tasA). For starter culture generation, one colony of B. subtilis from fresh Lysogeny broth (LB, Neogen, Lansing, Michigan, USA) agar plate was grown in LB and incubated at 37 °C at 150 rpm for 5 h. For all the experiments, both bacteria species were collected in late exponential phase.

Mono and dual-species biofilm formation

For B. subtilis mono-species biofilm, an overnight culture (30 °C at 150 rpm) was diluted 1:10 (to obtain final O.D (600 nm) = 0.07) into LB containing 3% lactose, and incubated at 37 °C at 50 rpm for 5 h42. For S. mutans mono-species biofilm, in 96 well plate (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark), overnight cultured S. mutans (O.D (600 nm) = 1) were diluted 1:10 into fresh BHI supplemented with 2% sucrose. The plate was incubated at 37 °C in 95% air/5% CO2 for 24 or 48 h. The medium was replaced with fresh medium after 24 h of incubation34. For dual-species biofilm, cells of B. subtilis and S. mutans were grown in 96 well plate as follows: to fresh BHI supplemented with 2% sucrose were introduced the overnight cultured S. mutans (diluted by a ratio 1:10, approximately 2.5 × 107 CFU) and B. subtilis (diluted by a ratio 1:100, approximately 2.5 × 105 CFU). The ratio between B. subtilis and S. mutans cells that were seeded to obtain the dual-species biofilm was approximately 1:100. The plate was incubated at 37 °C in 95% air/5% CO2 for 24 or 48 h. The medium was replaced with fresh medium after 24 h.

Visualization of mono and dual-species biofilms by SEM

SEM analysis was used for initial visualization of the generated biofilms mainly in terms of structure and the spatial organizations in multispecies biofilm. For B. subtilis mono-species biofilm: a sample of 10 µl from the culture containing the B. subtilis mono-species biofilm was placed on small cover slip43,44. The S. mutans mono and dual-species biofilms were grown as described above on sterile coverslip (5 mm diameter, glass, Barnaor, Israel). The coverslips were removed and washed twice with sterile demineralized water (DDW). All samples were fixed using 4% formaldehyde for 20 min and washed using DDW. The samples were visualized using an analytical Quanta 200 Environmental High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscope (EHRSEM) (FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).

Single cell force spectroscopy

SCFS was used to determine the initial interaction between B. subtilis cell and S. mutans biofilm. The experiment was conducted as described by Zeng et al.45, previously with slight modifications45.

Probes preparation

Tipless cantilevers (CSC38/No Al/tipless, Mikromasch, Sofia, Bulgaria) with a length of 350 µm, width of 32.5 µm, a thickness of 1 µm a nominal spring constant of 0.03 N/m were incubated for 20 min under UV. Then the cantilevers were immediately transferred to a solution of 4 mg/ml dopamine (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louise, Missouri, USA) in 20 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.5) (Eastman Kodak company, Rochester, NY, USA), and incubated for 30 min before rinsing in triple distilled water.

B. subtilis cell attachment

Starter cultures of B. subtilis cells (WT or ΔtasA) were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 3 min and washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) three times. 75 µl of re-suspended cells were placed on a coverslip and incubated for 20 min at RT to allow attachment. The unattached bacteria were removed by washing with PBS. A tipless polydopamine-coated cantilever was approached to one attached bacteria with 5 nN force for 300 s, resulting in immobilization of the cell on the cantilever.

Biofilm preparation

S. mutans biofilm was prepared as described above. The coverslip was removed, washed twice with PBS and glued to glass-slide using epoxy (JPK, Germany).

AFM force measurements

Force measurements were conducted in PBS using JPK Nanowizard 3 (JPK instruments, Germany). The sensitivity of tipless cantilevers was calibrated on a glass surface in PBS and the spring constant was calibrated using the thermal fluctuation method (included in the AFM software). After immobilization of a bacterial cell on the cantilever, force spectroscopy was performed by approaching the cantilever with the immobilized bacterium to either bare glass or biofilms of B. subtilis/S. mutans, to determine the maximum adhesion force of the cell to each sample. Force curves were measured with a maximum force of 2.5 nN and 15 s extend delay and repeated 10 times at three different positions. Measurements with each bacterium were conducted for a period of approximately 20 min. To ensure that the bacterium was still attached to the cantilever and that it retained its position, optical microscopy was used during the measurements when possible (glass, and B. subtilis biofilm). For measurements on S. mutans biofilm, visualization of the bacteria on the probes was conducted before and after each measurement and when a change in the force profile was observed. The images were taken using The images were taken using a x40 objective lens, Ti-E microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NY, USA) and a optiMOSTM sCMOS Camera (Qimagimg, Surrey, Canada) (Sup Fig. 1). Each measurement was performed using at least two different bacterial cells and/or biofilm samples. In detail: B. subtilis WT on a glass: 3 bacteria, 117 force curves, adhesion frequency: 73.5% B. subtilis WT on a B. subtilis biofilm: 2 bacteria on 2 different biofilms, 118 force curves adhesion frequency: 85.6%, B. subtilis WT on S. mutans biofilm: 3 bacteria on 2 different biofilms, 53 force curves adhesion frequency: 100%, B. subtilis ∆tasA on glass: 3 bacteria, 46 force curves adhesion frequency: 61%, B. subtilis ∆tasA on S. mutans biofilm: 2 bacteria on one biofilm 100 force curves adhesion frequency: 51%.

Importantly, control measurements between a PDA coated cantilever and, glass, B. subtilis biofilm and S. mutans biofilm were taken (Supplementary Fig. S2).

AFM measurements Analysis

Analysis was conducted using JPK data processing software. The adhesion force was considered as the highest attraction force in the curve (largest negative force), and the detachment work energy was evaluated by calculating the area between the curve and the baseline. Curves not exhibiting adhesion events were discarded from the adhesion force and energy calculation.

Characterization of biofilm structure by CLSM

CLSM was used for visualization of deeper layers of the biofilm and quantification of B. subtilis cells in the dual-species biofilm. Dual-species biofilm was prepared as described above using B. subtilis cells tagged with GFP. Incorporation of dextran-associated EP was visualized by adding 1 µM Alexa Fluor 647-labeled dextran conjugate (molecular weight, 10,000 MW, Molecular Probes Inc.) to the growth media, during biofilm formation as described previously38.

The generated biofilms were washed carefully using PBS and visualized by Zeiss LSM510 CLS microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Three-dimensional images were constructed using Zen software (Carl Zeiss). At least three random fields were observed in five independent experiments. The amount of EP produced by S. mutans and viable B. subtilis cells was calculated as blue and green fluorescence intensity, respectively, using ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).

B. subtilis aggregation in the presence of dextran

The effect of dextran, the primary polysaccharide in S. mutans’ EP23,26, on B. subtilis aggregation was evaluated using an aggregation assay. Starter cultures of B. subtilis cells (WT or ΔtasA) were grown as described above. The cells were centrifuged at 3000xg for 10 min and washed twice in aggregation buffer (1 M potassium buffer pH = 7.5). The bacterial cells were re-suspended in aggregation buffer supplemented with varying concentrations of dextran (MW = 11,800 g/mol) to resemble S. mutans EP. O.D (600 nm) was measured every 30 min for 2 h. Aggregation percentage was calculated by46:

ODinitial−ODfinallODinitial×100.

Dextran effect on B. subtilis adhesion

The effect of dextran on the incorporation of B. subtilis to the dual-species biofilm was tested using increased concentrations of dextranase47,48. Dextranase solution was prepared by dissolving 3 mg of lyophilized dextranase enzyme (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louise, Missouri, USA) in 1 ml of PBS. The dextranase solution was added to the dual-species formed biofilms in different amounts equal to: 156, 300, 600 and 900 units of enzyme. The generated biofilms were taken for visualization by CLSM as mentioned above. The amount of B. subtilis cells were calculated by fluorescent intensity using ImageJ software.

Quantification of tasA and eps operons expression

To analyse the effect of S. mutans presence on tasA and eps expression, we used B. subtilis PtapA-lacZ or Peps-lacZ strains. B. subtilis cells were grown separately or with S. mutans, in BHI supplemented with 2% sucrose. To determine the effect ∆pH on tasA expression, 30% lactic acid solution (Merck & Co., Inc. Kenilworth, New Jersey, US) was used for the adjustment of pH of the medium to pH 6. Samples were collected every 12 h; normalization conducted using CFU on selective plates (streptomycin-LB agar plates). O.D was calculated according to 1 O.D (600 nm) = 1.5*10^8 CFU49. β-Galactosidase activity assay was conducted as described previously50.

Statistical analysis

The obtained data were statistically analysed using t-test. When needed ANOVA following post-hoc t-test with Bonferroni correction was conducted. All tests applied were two-tailed, and a p-value of 5% or less was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel software.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Dataset 1 (258.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This report forms contribution No. 790/17-E, 2017 Series, from the Agricultural Research Organization, the Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Israel. This study forms part of Danielle Duanis-Assaf’s Ph.D. project. This work was partially supported by the COST ACTION FA1202 BacFoodNet. Danielle Duanis-Assaf is a recipient of Scholarship of Excellency for outstanding Ph.D. students from The ARO. We would like to thank Dr. Y. Chai of Northeastern University, Boston, USA for B. subtilis strains. We are also grateful to Dr. Mark Tarshish of the Hebrew University for excellent technical assistance with confocal microscopy.

Author Contributions

D.D.A. and M.S. contributed by preparing the main text of the manuscript (including all figures). D.D.A. is responsible for all the planning, experimenting and analysis of the data presented in this paper. T.D.A. and G.Z. were responsible for the A.F.M. experiments and A.F.M. data analysis. R.L.M., M.R. and D.S. are responsible for reviewing the paper. All authors included in this paper viewed and approved this manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-27548-1.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM. Microbial biofilms. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 1995;49:711–745. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS. Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell–cell distance. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2010;8:471–480. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Flemming H-C, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2010;8:623. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Watnick PI, Kolter R. Steps in the development of a Vibrio cholerae El Tor biofilm. Molecular microbiology. 1999;34:586–595. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01624.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ma L, et al. Assembly and development of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm matrix. PLoS pathogens. 2009;5:e1000354. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Decho, A. W., Visscher, P. T. & Reid, R. P. In Geobiology: Objectives, Concepts, Perspectives 71–86 (Elsevier, 2005).
  • 7.Otzen D, Nielsen PH. We find them here, we find them there: functional bacterial amyloid. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2008;65:910–927. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-7404-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blanco LP, Evans ML, Smith DR, Badtke MP, Chapman MR. Diversity, biogenesis and function of microbial amyloids. Trends in microbiology. 2012;20:66–73. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2011.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Taglialegna A, et al. Staphylococcal Bap proteins build amyloid scaffold biofilm matrices in response to environmental signals. PLoS pathogens. 2016;12:e1005711. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dueholm MS, et al. Functional amyloid in Pseudomonas. Molecular microbiology. 2010;77:1009–1020. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jakubovics, N. S. & Palmer, R. J. Jr. Oral microbial ecology: Current research and new perspectives. (Horizon Scientific Press, 2013).
  • 12.Lee W-H, et al. Bacterial alterations in salivary microbiota and their association in oral cancer. Scientific reports. 2017;7:16540. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16418-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Motta R, Ramacciato J, Groppo F, Pacheco AB, de Mattos-Filho T. Environmental contamination before, during, and after dental treatment. American journal of dentistry. 2005;18:340–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamane K, et al. Identification and characterization of clinically isolated biofilm-forming gram-positive rods from teeth associated with persistent apical periodontitis. Journal of endodontics. 2009;35:347–352. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiological reviews. 1986;50:353. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.4.353-380.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Banas JA. Virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. Front Biosci. 2004;9:1267–1277. doi: 10.2741/1305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Branda SS, González-Pastor JE, Ben-Yehuda S, Losick R, Kolter R. Fruiting body formation by Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2001;98:11621–11626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191384198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vlamakis H, Chai Y, Beauregard P, Losick R, Kolter R. Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2013;11:157–168. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Branda SS, et al. Genes involved in formation of structured multicellular communities by Bacillus subtilis. Journal of bacteriology. 2004;186:3970–3979. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3970-3979.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Branda SS, Chu F, Kearns DB, Losick R, Kolter R. A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix. Molecular microbiology. 2006;59:1229–1238. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05020.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chu F, Kearns DB, Branda SS, Kolter R, Losick R. Targets of the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular microbiology. 2006;59:1216–1228. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.05019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Romero D, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Amyloid fibers provide structural integrity to Bacillus subtilis biofilms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107:2230–2234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910560107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sutherland IW. Biofilm exopolysaccharides: a strong and sticky framework. Microbiology. 2001;147:3–9. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-1-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.DeSalvo, S. Probing Cell Membrane And Biofilm Extracellular Matrix Interactions With Tumor Necrosis Factor-Alpha and Interleukin-6 Through Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using A Detailed Chemical Description (2014).
  • 25.Lemos JA, Quivey RG, Jr., Koo H, Abranches J. Streptococcus mutans: a new Gram-positive paradigm? Microbiology. 2013;159:436–445. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.066134-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gibbons R, Banghart S. Synthesis of extracellular dextran by cariogenic bacteria and its presence in human dental plaque. Archives of oral biology. 1967;12:11–IN13. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(67)90137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.An YH, Friedman RJ. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterial surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 1998;43:338–348. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3&#x0003c;338::AID-JBM16&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tuson HH, Weibel DB. Bacteria–surface interactions. Soft matter. 2013;9:4368–4380. doi: 10.1039/c3sm27705d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sanchez-Vizuete P, et al. Identification of ypqP as a new Bacillus subtilis biofilm determinant that mediates the protection of Staphylococcus aureus against antimicrobial agents in mixed-species communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015;81:109–118. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02473-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Collinson S, Doig P, Doran J, Clouthier S, Kay W. Thin, aggregative fimbriae mediate binding of Salmonella enteritidis to fibronectin. Journal of bacteriology. 1993;175:12–18. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.1.12-18.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryu J-H, Beuchat LR. Biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157: H7 on stainless steel: effect of exopolysaccharide and curli production on its resistance to chlorine. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71:247–254. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.247-254.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Palmer RJ., Jr. Composition and development of oral bacterial communities. Periodontology. 2014;2000(64):20–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2012.00453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shemesh M, Chai Y. A combination of glycerol and manganese promotes biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis via histidine kinase KinD signaling. J Bacteriol. 2013;195:2747–2754. doi: 10.1128/JB.00028-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Assaf D, Steinberg D, Shemesh M. Lactose triggers biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. International Dairy Journal. 2015;42:51–57. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.10.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moye, Z., Zeng, L. & Burne, R. A. Modification of gene expression and virulence traits in Streptococcus mutans in response to carbohydrate availability. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, AEM. 03579–03513 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. Lactic acid excretion by Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology. 1996;142:33–39. doi: 10.1099/13500872-142-1-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen Y, Gozzi K, Yan F, Chai Y. Acetic acid acts as a volatile signal to stimulate bacterial biofilm formation. MBio. 2015;6:e00392–00315. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00392-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Koo H, Xiao J, Klein M, Jeon J. Exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus mutans glucosyltransferases modulate the establishment of microcolonies within multispecies biofilms. Journal of bacteriology. 2010;192:3024–3032. doi: 10.1128/JB.01649-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Burne R. Oral streptococci… products of their environment. Journal of Dental Research. 1998;77:445–452. doi: 10.1177/00220345980770030301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Besingi RN, et al. Functional amyloids in Streptococcus mutans, their use as targets of biofilm inhibition and initial characterization of SMU_63c. Microbiology. 2017;163:488–501. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Diehl, A. et al. Structural changes of TasA in biofilm formation of Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1718102115 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Duanis-Assaf D, Steinberg D, Chai Y, Shemesh M. The LuxS based quorum sensing governs lactose induced biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Frontiers in microbiology. 2016;6:1517. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oknin H, Steinberg D, Shemesh M. Magnesium ions mitigate biofilm formation of Bacillus species via downregulation of matrix genes expression. Frontiers in microbiology. 2015;6:907. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van Gestel J, Vlamakis H, Kolter R. From cell differentiation to cell collectives: Bacillus subtilis uses division of labor to migrate. PLoS biology. 2015;13:e1002141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zeng G, Müller T, Meyer RL. Single-cell force spectroscopy of bacteria enabled by naturally derived proteins. Langmuir. 2014;30:4019–4025. doi: 10.1021/la404673q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.He Z, et al. Role of the luxS gene in initial biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology. 2015;25:60–68. doi: 10.1159/000371816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hayacibara MF, et al. The influence of mutanase and dextranase on the production and structure of glucans synthesized by streptococcal glucosyltransferases. Carbohydrate research. 2004;339:2127–2137. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2004.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hwang G, Klein MI, Koo H. Analysis of the mechanical stability and surface detachment of mature Streptococcus mutans biofilms by applying a range of external shear forces. Biofouling. 2014;30:1079–1091. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2014.969249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Paidhungat M, et al. Mechanisms of induction of germination of Bacillus subtilis spores by high pressure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68:3172–3175. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.6.3172-3175.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chai Y, Chu F, Kolter R, Losick R. Bistability and biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis. Molecular microbiology. 2008;67:254–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.06040.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Dataset 1 (258.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES