Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 20.
Published in final edited form as: Langmuir. 2018 Apr 30;34(19):5527–5534. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00275

Dendrimersomes Exhibit Lamellar-to-Sponge Phase Transitions

Samantha E Wilner 1, Qi Xiao 1, Zachary T Graber 1, Samuel E Sherman 1, Virgil Percec 1, Tobias Baumgart 1,*
PMCID: PMC6010174  NIHMSID: NIHMS973992  PMID: 29660277

Abstract

Lamellar to nonlamellar membrane shape transitions play essential roles in key cellular processes, such as membrane fusion and fission, and occur in response to external stimuli, including drug treatment and heat. A subset of these transitions can be modeled by means of thermally inducible amphiphile assemblies. We previously reported on mixtures of hydrogenated, fluorinated, and hybrid Janus dendrimers (JDs) that self-assemble into complex dendrimersomes (DMSs), including dumbbells, and serve as promising models for understanding the complexity of biological membranes. Here we show, by means of a variety of complementary techniques, that DMSs formed by single JDs or by mixtures of JDs undergo a thermally induced lamellar-to-sponge transition. Consistent with the formation of a three- dimensional bilayer network, we show that DMSs become more permeable to water-soluble fluorophores after transitioning to the sponge phase. These DMSs may be useful not only in modeling isotropic membrane rearrangements of biological systems but also in drug delivery since nonlamellar delivery vehicles can promote endosomal disruption and cargo release.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms973992u1.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Self-assembled amphiphile membranes can serve as valuable models for understanding the complexity of biological membranes because they assemble into a range of structures and phases dictated by (1) intrinsic chemical characteristics such as the hydrocarbon tail length or headgroup structure and (2) externally controllable variables including temperature and water content. Using amphiphiles to model the shape transitions of biological membranes from lamellar to non- lamellar is particularly desirable as these transitions play essential roles in key cellular processes such as membrane fusion and fission, protein activation, and membrane composition regulation.1,2 Nonlamellar membrane rearrangements also occur in response to external stimuli such as hypoxia, drug treatment, anesthetics, viral infection, and changes in temperature.13

Janus dendrimers (JDs) are one class of synthetic amphiphiles that have been shown to assemble into a diverse range of structures called dendrimersomes (DMSs) with morphologies including cubosomes, disks, tubular vesicles, helical ribbons, and onionlike vesicles.46 As the word “Janus” describes, JDs are two-faced molecules in that they consist of two structurally and functionally different branches.7 Like lipids, the JDs described here are amphipathic, bearing both hydrophobic and hydrophilic branches. The range of structures produced via JD self-assembly, along with the fact that JDs are stable and biocompatible, suggests that they can model membrane rearrangements, including those induced by external stimuli.810 Understanding how and when these transitions occur also has the potential to better inform the design of drug delivery vehicles that benefit from nonlamellar structures for enhanced cargo release.1113

We previously reported that hydrogenated (RH), fluorinated (RF), and hybrid hydrogenated–fluorinated (RHF) Janus dendrimers self-assemble into a variety of structures dependent on composition.14,15 At 20 wt % RHF, maintaining equal weight components of RH and RF (40 wt %, respectively), we observed supramolecular JD assemblies that are dumbbell-shaped in which two DMSs, one consisting primarily of RH and the other of RF, are surrounded by an exterior shell of RH dendrimers. Here, we characterize a previously unobserved thermally inducible lamellar-to-sponge transition for these dumbbell-like DMSs and for homogeneous, single-component DMSs.

The sponge (L3) phase is a macroscopically isotropic multiconnected bilayer that forms a three-dimensional network.16 The sponge phase has been observed in a range of binary and ternary systems including (1) nonionic surfactant– water, (2) ionic surfactant–water in the presence of salts, (3) oil–water–surfactant, (4) certain ionized phospholipids, and (5) block copolymers.1719 The phase behavior of these systems is affected by composition, molecular structure, and external stimuli such as temperature.1822 In the case of branched-linear block copolymers, Cho et al. demonstrated that by changing the ratio of two polymers with differing lengths of polystyrene they could dictate the morphology of self- assembled nanostructures in solution, ranging from spheres to sponges to hexasomes. In another example, the binary mixture of pentaoxyethylene dodecylether (C12E5) and water, the sponge phase is observed at both high water content and high temperature (>50 °C).16,23,24

The formation of the sponge phase can be explained by considering the spontaneous mean curvature (H0) of the membrane. At a certain temperature (45–50 °C in the case of C12E5), the lamellar state is most stable and H0 ≈ 0. Increasing the temperature results in the formation of the sponge phase with H0 < 0, i.e., membrane bending toward water. In general, the formation of the L3 phase can be characterized as one in which the surfactant monolayer of a bilayer exhibits spontaneous curvature toward the bulk solvent and one in which the interbilayer interactions are weak.16 In fact, the structure of alkyl oligo(ethylene glycol) and that of the linear block copolymers described by Cho et al. are reminiscent of the JDs studied here, supporting our observations. Hydrophobic portions of both molecules are alkyl chains (either fluorinated or hydrogenated in the case of our JDs), and the hydrophilic portions are ethylene glycol repeats.

The sponge phase is typically characterized by small-angle neutron scattering (SANS), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM), polarization microscopy, conductivity measurements, NMR, or fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).2331 Changes in the permeability of DMSs can also be assessed relaxometrically.32,33 DMS heterogeneity in our preparations, in terms of both structure and size, required fluorescently labeled JDs to characterize the lamellar-to-sponge transition using fluorescence polarization, FRAP, and permeability experiments rather than spectroscopic techniques which rely on sample homogeneity. Using these techniques along with cryo-TEM, we demonstrate that the lamellar-to-sponge transition occurs not only for dumbbell-like DMSs of mixed JD composition but also for single-component DMSs made of RH only or RF only. Our methods allow for real-time observation of the lamellar-to- sponge transition at specific temperatures using fluorescence confocal microscopy imaging.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

Preparation of Dendrimersomes by Film Hydration

A solution of JDs (10 mg/mL, 200 μL) in THF was deposited on the top surface of a roughened Teflon sheet, with a surface area of 1 cm2, in a flat-bottomed vial followed by evaporation of the solvent for 2 h. The Teflon sheet was dried in vacuo for an additional 12 h. PBS (2 mL) was added to submerge the dendrimer film on the Teflon sheet at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL, and the vial was placed in an oven maintained at 60 °C for 12 h for hydration. The sample was then mixed using a vortex mixer for 30 s.

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

DMSs were imaged by confocal fluorescence microscopy using the FluoView 3000 scanning system configured on an IX83 inverted microscopy platform (Olympus, Center Valley PA). For images taken at room temperature, a 60× 1.1 NA water-immersion lens was used (Olympus). Imaging chambers (10 μL) containing DMSs were formed between two coverslips (25 × 25 mm2, Fisher Scientific) sealed with vacuum grease. For all experiments involving changes in temperature, a 40× 0.75 NA air objective (Olympus) was used since the water immersion lens would act as a heat sink. Imaging chambers (10–15 μL) for heating experiments were made between two circular coverslips of different diameters (22 and 18 mm diameters, respectively) and sealed with vacuum grease and clear nail polish. The imaging chamber was then attached via silicone-based thermal paste to a Peltier device supported between two thin aluminum plates (Figure S1). Temperature was controlled using a PTC-CH series chassis mount temperature controller (PTC5K-CH, Wavelength Electronics, Bozeman, MT) via LabVIEW software (National Instruments, Austin, TX). DMSs containing 7HC were excited at a wavelength of λ = 405 nm, and emission was monitored at λ = 430–470 nm. Those containing NBD were excited at λ = 488 nm, and emission was monitored at λ = 500– 540 nm. Those containing RhB were excited at λ = 561 nm with emission monitored at λ = 570–620 nm. Laser intensities were adjusted so that the fluorescence signal was not oversaturated. Image processing and analysis were completed with ImageJ 1.49v software.

Fluorescence Polarization

DMSs (40:40:20 RH/RF/RHF) with 1% RH-RhB and 1% RF-NBD or with 1% RH-NBD and 1% RF-RhB were prepared by film hydration. DMSs were imaged via confocal microscopy as described above with the addition of a linearly polarizing film that was placed beneath the objective lens during imaging. The RhB fluorescence intensity was observed without the polarizing film and in the presence of the film at two angles, differing by 90°. Lamellarity was identified through the observation of alternating bands of RhB fluorescence intensity maxima and minima that shifted by 90° when the polarizing film was rotated by 90°. With a loss of lamellarity, these differences in fluorescence intensity were no longer observed, and rotation of the polarizing film had no effect on the distribution of fluorescence intensity across the DMS.

Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP)

DMSs consisting of 40:40:20 RH/RF/RHF with 1% RH-RhB and 1% RF-NBD were prepared by film hydration as described above. Imaging chambers were made with 10 μL of DMS between two glass coverslips (25 × 25 mm2) and sealed with vacuum grease. FRAP experiments were conducted on both onionlike and spongelike DMSs. Onionlike DMSs were identified by confocal fluorescence microscopy as having multiple bilayers that appeared unconnected. The interior layer of the onion was selected as the region of interest for photobleaching (Figure 3B). For experiments involving spongelike DMSs, DMSs were first heated to 50 °C for 10 min in an eppendorf tube and cooled to room temperature before imaging and subsequent FRAP measurements. Photobleaching of RhB was conducted using both 488 and 561 nm lasers at 100% intensity for 250–350 ms. The recovery of RhB fluorescence intensity was recorded at 3.2 s intervals for 5 min after photobleaching.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Photobleaching recovery occurring in a spongelike region of a heated DMS is consistent with the formation of a sponge phase. Representative photobleaching recovery experiment performed on a heated DMS (A) and on a layer of an onionlike DMS (B). Photobleaching regions are indicated by the white dotted circle (A) or white arrow (B). In the spongelike DMS (A), the fluorescence intensity in the photobleached region recovered to reach the fluorescence intensity of the background whereas the fluorescence intensity of the bleached layer of the two-layer onion did not recover (B). N = 5; scale bars = 5 μm.

Dendrimersome Permeability

DMSs consisting of 40:40:20 RH/RF/RHF with 1% RH-RhB and 1% RF-NBD were prepared by film hydration as described above. DMSs were mixed with two water- soluble fluorophores of varying molecular weight: CF 405S-amine (CF405S, 1.1 kDa, Millipore Sigma, St. Louis MO) at a final concentration of 0.015 mg/mL in PBS or Cascade Blue-dextran (CB- dex, 10 kDa, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA) at a final concentration of 0.1 mg/mL CB-dex in PBS. DMSs were imaged via confocal fluorescence microscopy while heating as described above. CF405S and CB-dex were excited at λ = 405 nm, and emission was monitored at λ = 430–470 nm. The fluorescence intensity was measured both outside and inside each dumbbell-shaped DMS using ImageJ 1.49v software.

Cryo-Transmission Electron Microscopy (Cryo-TEM)

Cryo- TEM images were acquired using a JEOL 2100 TEM microscope at a voltage of 200 kV. A 2 μL drop of each sample was deposited on a 100 μm lacey carbon film on a copper mesh grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). The grid was blotted for 5 s with filter paper to remove excess liquid before plunging the grid into liquified ethane (cooled by liquid nitrogen) to freeze the sample and ensure vitrification of the water in the sample. For heated samples, the sample and grid were kept on a heating block at 60 °C until immediately before blotting and cryo-plunging to prevent significant cooling of the sample before freezing. Vitrified grids were transferred to a cryo-transfer stage immersed in liquid nitrogen for insertion into the TEM microscope. TEM images were acquired at 6–12K magnification. During imaging, the samples were kept below −175 °C to prevent sublimation of the vitrified solvent.

Silanization of Glass Surfaces

Glass coverslips were acid cleaned overnight using a 2% mixture of Nochromix (Godax Laboratories, Cabin John MD) in sulfuric acid. Cleaned slides were washed excessively with water and dried first with nitrogen gas followed by heating to ∼150 °C. Dried, cooled slides were then quickly submerged (10 s) in a 4% solution of trichloro(octadecyl)silane (OTS) in toluene. Slides were immediately and rigorously washed with toluene after submersion and dried using nitrogen gas followed by heating for 1 h at 150 °C. Advancing and receding contact angles were imaged using a contact angle goniometer and measured using the contact angle plugin in ImageJ. DMSs were pipetted onto these silanized glass surfaces for subsequent imaging experiments.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Imaging Dendrimersomes at Constant Temperature and during Stepwise Heating

Dumbbell-shaped DMSs were prepared by thin film hydration of a three-component system of JDs made of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) from a Teflon sheet. Fluorescently labeled JDs were added to this mixture at 1 wt % each before deposition on the Teflon sheet. JDs with RH chains were labeled with Rhodamine B (RH-RhB, red), JDs with RF chains were labeled with 7-nitrobenzofurazan (RF-NBD, green), and JDs with RHF chains were labeled with 7- hydroxycoumarin (RHF-7HC, blue) as previously described (Scheme 1).34,35

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Structure of Janus Dendrimers with Hydrogenated Chains (RH), Fluorinated Chains (RF), and Hybrid Hydrogenated–Fluorinated Chains (RHF), Each Labeled with the Fluorophores Rhodamine B (RhB, Red), 7-Nitrobenzofurazan (NBD, Green), or 7-Hydroxycoumarin (7HC, Blue)

These dumbbell-shaped DMSs consisted of two phases, shown as green and red, surrounded by a red shell (Figure 1A). On the basis of previous work, we assumed that the fluorescently labeled molecules accurately report on their environment.14,15 Thus, the green phase marked by RF-NBD primarily consisted of RF and the red phase marked by RH-RhB primarily consisted of RH. RHF-7HC was observed to colocalize preferentially with RH-RhB (Figure 1). Cryo-TEM and schematic drawings of these dumbbell-shaped DMSs were published previously.15

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Dumbbell-like DMSs undergo structural changes upon heating. Representative confocal microscopy images of a single dumbbell-like DMS heated in a stepwise manner to 50 °C (A–E) and cooled to 25 °C (F). The DMS composition was RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) and 1 wt % each of RH-RhB (column 1), RF-NBD (column 2), and RHF-7HC (column 3). N = 20; scale bars = 5 μm.

Representative dumbbell-shaped DMSs were heated in a stepwise manner and imaged via time-lapse fluorescence confocal microscopy. DMSs prepared at 1 mg/mL were further diluted 1:2 in PBS and then sandwiched between two glass coverslips sealed with vacuum grease and clear nail polish to form the imaging chamber. The imaging chamber was then attached to a Peltier device with thermal paste (Figure S1). DMSs were heated from 25 to 50 °C followed by cooling back to 25 °C in a stepwise manner (Figure 1). By 40 °C, DMSs lost their dumbbell-like shape and transitioned into a core–shell structure in which the core was enriched in RF-NBD and the shell was enriched in RH-RhB (Figure 1C). Further heating resulted in the coalescence of features within each phase of the DMS (Figure S2), a transition which appeared to be unstable, followed by another transition in which RF appeared to wet the RH core (Figure 1E). Cooling resulted in dewetting and separation of RF and RH components (Figure 1F). This transition was irreversible as we did not observe a restoration of the dumbbell shape after cooling, which may be due to the strength of interbilayer interactions. Importantly, these structural transitions were not unique to dumbbell-shaped DMSs. Similar structural transitions were observed for RH-only and RF-only DMSs, respectively, implying that the presence of RHF was not a requirement in these transitions (Figure S3).

To elucidate whether this overall transition is unique to single DMSs or to the DMS sample as a whole, we used confocal fluorescence microscopy to characterize the bulk sample preparation before and after heating. Hydration of the RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) mixture resulted in a distribution of morphologies including dumbbell-shaped, isotropic, and onionlike DMSs (Figure S4). Quantification of three independent DMS preparations via confocal fluorescence microscopy, where uncertainty is expressed as a standard deviation, revealed that 36.1 ± 1.4% of the observed DMSs were isotropic, with the remaining sample consisting of lamellar, onionlike, core–shell, dumbbell-shaped, or otherwise aggregated or uniquely structured DMSs. Dumbbell-shaped DMSs comprised 2 ± 1.4% of the sample population; however, their structure remains of interest because of its similarity to biological membranes, representing either a prefusion or prefission stalk depending on the directionality of the pathway.15 Most interestingly, bulk heating of the RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) mixture to 60 °C shifted the distribution of DMSs to structures that were isotropic in both shape and composition (89.3 ± 11.4% of the total population), suggesting that there is a thermally inducible morphological transition at which the general DMS population loses its morphological heterogeneity. Cooling the bulk sample back to 25 °C after heating did not restore sample heterogeneity, suggesting that the transition is irreversible.

Distinguishing between Lamellar and Nonlamellar Structures Using Fluorescence Polarization Microscopy

We hypothesized that the structural transition observed via confocal fluorescence microscopy imaging is lamellar-to- sponge. Using electron microscopy, we previously showed that RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) DMSs are lamellar.15 Here, we used fluorescence polarization measurements to distinguish between lamellar and nonlamellar structures in order to test our hypothesis that both dumbbell-shaped and single-component DMSs lose lamellarity upon heating (Figure 2). As described above, an imaging chamber containing RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1% RF-NBD and 1% RH-RhB DMSs was attached to a Peltier device. Dumbbell-shaped DMSs were imaged during heating in the presence or absence of a linear polarizer. Fluorescent molecules with transition dipole moments oriented parallel to the electric field vector of the linearly polarized light exhibited maximum fluorescence intensities. In the lamellar state, this resulted in alternating bands of fluorescence intensity maxima and minima since molecules are structurally oriented in a lamellar membrane. We observed these bands of fluorescence intensity for RH-RhB at 25 °C in a representative dumbbell- shaped DMS (Figure 2C, white and gray arrows). Rotating the linear polarizer by 90° resulted in a shift in fluorescence maxima and minima by 90° (Figure 2D, white and gray arrows). During and after heating, we observed that the rotation of the linear polarizer had no effect on fluorescence intensity (Figure 2C,D, columns 2–4), which indicated a loss of lamellarity as fluorescent molecules became randomly distributed across the DMS.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fluorescence polarization experiments following RH-RhB confirm the loss of lamellarity during heating and cooling of a representative dumbbell-like DMS. Fluorescence polarization comparison of a single dumbbell-like DMS heated to 50 °C (columns 1–3) and cooled to 25 °C (column 4). Representative confocal microscopy images show the DMS labeled with RH-RhB and RF-NBD merged (A) or RH-RhB only in grayscale (B). Applying a linear polarizer at 0° (C) versus rotated 90° (D) shows bands of higher fluorescence intensity (indicated by white arrows) dependent on the orientation of the polarizer, indicating the lamellar organization of the membrane. Gray arrows represent bands of lower intensity. The orientation of white and gray arrows switches upon rotation of the linear polarizer. The loss of lamellarity was observed as the DMS was heated and cooled. The DMS composition was RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) and 1 wt % each of RH-RhB and RFNBD. N = 4; scale bars = 5 μm.

To confirm that the RF phase of these DMSs also undergoes a lamellar-to-sponge transition upon heating, we synthesized new fluorescent JDs in which RF was labeled with RhB and RH was labeled with NBD. These JDs were used to make DMSs composed of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1% RH-NBD and 1% RF-RhB. NBD is likely not rotationally restricted in the DMS membrane in the lamellar state due to its longest axis being approximately 3 times shorter than RhB, which prevents it from being a useful marker in fluorescence polarization experiments. Therefore, we used the RhB fluorescence intensity as a marker for lamellarity and measured the fluorescence intensity of RF-RhB during the heating of dumbbell-shaped DMSs. These measurements confirmed that the RF component of the dumbbell-shaped DMSs transitions from lamellar to sponge during heating (Figure S5). This lamellar-to-sponge transition was also observed for single-component RH DMSs labeled with 1% RH-RhB (Figure S6).

Characterizing Lamellar and Spongelike Structures Using FRAP

To confirm the loss of lamellarity upon heating, we compared fluorescence recovery patterns using FRAP. FRAP measurements were conducted on a representative two- layer onion and on a spongelike DMS (Figure 3). A single interior layer of an onion made of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1% RF-NBD and 1% RH-RhB was photobleached, and fluorescence recovery was monitored over time. No recovery was observed within the bleached layer due to a lack of connection between layers of the onion (Figure 3B). On the other hand, complete recovery was expected after photobleaching a region of a spongelike DMS since the bilayer network is interconnected. DMSs made of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1% RF-NBD and 1% RH-RhB were heated to 50 °C for 10 min before photobleaching (Figure 3A). The recovery of RH-RhB was measured over time. Fluorescence recovery was observed in the bleached region, confirming that these structures are not lamellar but are in fact spongelike (Figure 3A).

Monitoring DMS Permeability Changes Using Water- Soluble Dyes

The lamellar-to-sponge transition is expected to coincide with an increase in DMS permeability, dependent on the size of pores formed in the sponge phase. To measure changes in permeability upon heating, DMSs made of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1% RF-NBD and 1% RH-RhB were mixed with either a small water-soluble dye, CF405S (1.1 kDa) at 0.015 mg/mL, or with Cascade Blue-dextran (CB-dex, 10 kDa) at 0.1 mg/mL. DMSs were then heated, and the fluorescence intensity of either CF405S or CB-dex was measured in the interior of the dumbbell-shaped DMS during heating. Consistent with the loss of lamellarity and the formation of the sponge phase, dumbbell-like DMSs became permeable to both molecules during heating (Figure 4). DMSs became more permeable to the smaller water-soluble fluorophore, CF405S, as compared to the larger CB-dex.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Dumbbell-like DMSs become permeable to dye upon heating, consistent with formation of a sponge phase. Dumbbell-like DMSs consisting of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) and 1 wt % each of RH-RhB and RF-NBD (A, C) were incubated with either a water-soluble fluorophore (CF405S, 1.1 kDa) or Cascade Blue-labeled dextran (CB-dex, 10 kDa). Initially, CF405S (B) and CB-dex (D) were excluded from the interior of the DMS at 25 °C. As each DMS was heated to 40 °C, it became increasingly permeable, and the fluorescence intensity of CF405S (E, F) and CB-dex (G, H) in the interior of the DMS increased. Error bars represent standard deviations. N = 3; scale bars = 5 μm.

Measuring Structural Transitions of Dumbbell-like DMSs on Silanized Glass Surfaces

To exclude the possibility that the thermally inducible lamellar-to-sponge transition is dependent upon the adherence of DMSs to a glass surface, we conducted additional experiments using silanized glass coverslips. Coverslips were acid cleaned and then incubated with trichloro(octadecyl)silane (OTS) before use. Successful silanization was confirmed by performing contact angle measurements. Advancing and receding contact angles on silanized surfaces were measured to be 101.1 ± 4.2° and 102.4 ± 3.1°, respectively, where error is expressed as the standard deviation. These measurements are in good agreement with each other, indicating homogeneous silanization, and are equivalent to published values.36 DMSs prepared with RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) and 1% RF-NBD and 1% RH-RhB were imaged as described above using these silanized glass coverslips. Structural changes were observed via confocal fluorescence microscopy as the dumbbell-shaped DMS was heated and cooled (Figure S7). These structural changes were identical to the changes observed using an untreated glass surface.

Visualizing DMSs Using Cryo-TEM

Visual confirmation of spongelike DMSs was obtained via cryo-TEM. DMSs prepared with RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) were heated to 60 °C immediately before freezing and imaging. A greater fraction of spongelike DMSs was observed in the heated sample as compared to the unheated sample (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Spongelike DMSs observed via cryo-TEM. Cryo-TEM was performed on DMS preparations of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) with 1 wt % each of RH-RhB, RF-NBD, and RHF-7HC that were either bulk heated to 60 °C or not. Representative image of a spongelike DMS observed in the heated sample (A) as compared to representative lamellar DMSs observed in a nonheated DMS preparation (B). Scale bars = 100 nm.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Using confocal fluorescence microscopy, we have demonstrated thermally inducible structural changes in Janus dendrimersomes. We observed these transitions by fluorescence polarization, FRAP, permeability experiments, and cryo-TEM, all of which suggest that this transition is lamellar-to-sponge. Increasing temperature in our system results in membrane bending toward water (H0 < 0) and fusion events between bilayers forming the interconnected three-dimensional network that is characteristic of the sponge phase.16,23 As described in theoretical detail by Anderson et al., the volume fraction of this bilayer network is determined by the product of the spontaneous curvature of the monolayer (H0) and half the width of the bilayer (L). Furthermore, the sponge phase is favored over the cubic phase when interbilayer interactions are weak.16 Our experimental evidence supports a lamellar-to- sponge rather than a lamellar-to-cubic transition, but we note that cubosomes have been observed via the self-assembly of other JDs.4,6

The lamellar-to-sponge transition described above was found to be irreversible with respect to temperature cycles. We hypothesize that the morphology of initial DMS assemblies formed during thin film hydration can be explained by a change in the hydration state of the membrane (i.e., swelling). During this swelling stage, the water chemical potential is not constant in the system as water availability is limited, and thus DMSs form due to an initially low hydration state. Subjecting DMSs to cycles of heating and cooling after initial assembly (i.e., high hydration) results in the observed lamellar-to-sponge transition. During these temperature cycles, water is present in excess, and we believe that this difference in water chemical potential explains why we do not recapture the initial composition of assemblies observed immediately after thin film hydration. Although structural transitions involving changes in hydration can be reversible (e.g., water–n-decane–C12E5 and glycerol monooleyl ether–propylene glycol–water systems), such transitions are dependent upon temperature, composition, and water content.23,29 In our system, the initial swelling process resulting in DMS formation is irreversible.

Despite this irreversibility, changes in membrane curvature observed in this lamellar-to-sponge transition may be caused by entropy-driven dehydration of the oligo(ethylene glycol) units that make up these JDs. At elevated temperatures, the hydration number per monomer of poly(ethylene glycols) (PEGs) is known to decrease, with phase separation occurring above the lower critical solution temperature (LCST).37,38 The thermosensitive behavior of PEG and similar polymers has been exploited to control the aggregation state and phase transitions of other microstructures by tuning polymer LCSTs.39,40 In the case of our DMSs, partial dehydration of the oligo(ethylene glycol) units as temperature increases may induce curvature changes that promote the lamellar-to-sponge transition. We would expect the membrane to be in a partially dehydrated state during these temperature cycles, and since water remains in excess as described above, we do not expect to observe the initial composition of DMS assemblies.

As our DMSs transitioned from lamellar to sponge, we observed characteristic structural changes including the independent coalescence of hydrogenated and fluorinated dendrimers within single DMSs between 40 and 45 °C and a wetting transition at 50 °C (Figure 6). Ultimately, a dewetting transition occurs upon cooling resulting in the formation of two distinct isotropic spheres. The distribution of dendrimers is similar to that observed in aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) containing giant vesicles (GVs). In ATPS-containing GVs, for example, one in which PEG and dextran are encapsulated within a GV, changing the polymer concentration affects the wetting transition. In our work, increases in temperature induce a wetting transition of two sponge phases, giving rise to the observed structural transitions.4143

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Schematic of structural transitions observed during heating and cooling of a dumbbell-like DMS. Schematic of proposed structural transitions occurring while heating a dumbbell-like DMS consisting of RH/RF/RHF (40:40:20 wt %) to 50 °C followed by cooling to room temperature. The dumbbell-like DMS changes from a lamellar state to one that is spongelike as the DMS is heated. Cooling does not restore lamellarity.

The thermally inducible lamellar-to-sponge transition observed among Janus dendrimersomes is a structural change that has implications in drug delivery and can provide insight into isotropic membrane rearrangements that occur in biological membranes. The potential utility of DMSs in therapeutic applications has recently been established. Importantly, Nummelin et al. demonstrated the ability of DMSs to encapsulate propanalol while Filippi et al. validated the use of DMSs as prednisolone phosphate drug carriers and MRI contrast agents in vivo.34,35 DMSs with nonlamellar structures as described here have the potential to serve as delivery vehicles with enhanced endosomal disruption and cargo release, a strategy which has been effective at enhancing gene silencing via siRNA in vitro in other delivery systems.1113 Introducing lipids (e.g., DOPE) into drug delivery vehicles that are prone to form nonlamellar structures has also been used to promote cargo release upon ultrasound exposure.44 Further- more, the development of thermosensitive liposomes suggests that heat can similarly be used to trigger cargo release from other drug delivery vehicles.45 In fact, Thermodox, a lysolipid- containing thermosensitive liposome encapsulating doxorubicin, is in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of primary liver cancer.46,47 Similarly, we envision that heat may be used to trigger the release of cargo from DMSs.

Not only can we thermally induce a lamellar-to-sponge phase transition, but using these synthetic amphiphiles we also have the potential to control sponge formation by tuning the spontaneous curvature of the membrane in order to generate a range of thermally inducible spongelike structures.48 Such control has been possible in analogous block copolymer systems by tuning characteristics such as the branch architecture, polymer length, and block copolymer ratio, suggesting that it would be possible to create a library of DMSs with distinct morphologies and thermally inducible transitions.17,49,50

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from National Science Foundation (NSF) grants DMR-1066116 and DMR-1120901, the P. Roy Vagelos Chair at the University of Pennsylvania, and the Humboldt Foundation (to V.P.); NIH grant R01 GM097552 (to T.B.); and the University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and Teaching (PENN-PORT) fellowship funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Institutional Research and Career Development Award (IRACDA, 5 K12 GM081259-09, to S.E.W.).

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00275.

Materials, dendrimer characterization, synthesis of dendrimers, and supplemental figures (PDF)

ORCID

Qi Xiao: 0000-0002-6470-0407

Zachary T. Graber: 0000-0002-7104-9202

Samuel E. Sherman: 0000-0001-7826-7088

Virgil Percec: 0000-0001-5926-0489

Tobias Baumgart: 0000-0001-7385-8460

Author Contributions

S.E.W., Q.X., T.B., and V.P., designed the experiments. Q.X. and S.E.S. synthesized the Janus dendrimers. S.E.W. performed all confocal microscopy experiments. Z.T.G. and S.E.W. performed cryo-TEM experiments. The manuscript was written by S.E.W. and T.B. All authors have reviewed the manuscript.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  • 1.Koynova R, Tenchov B. Transitions between Lamellar and Non-Lamellar Phases in Membrane Lipids and Their Physiological Roles. OA Biochem. 2013;1(1):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rilfors L, Lindblom G. Regulation of Lipid Composition in Biological Membranes—Biophysical Studies of Lipids and Lipid Synthesizing Enzymes. Colloids Surf, B. 2002;26:112–124. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Almsherqi ZA, Kohlwein SD, Deng Y. Cubic Membranes: a Legend Beyond the Flatland* of Cell Membrane Organization. J Cell Biol. 2006;173(6):839–844. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200603055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Percec V, Wilson DA, Leowanawat P, Wilson CJ, Hughes AD, Kaucher MS, Hammer DA, Levine DH, Kim AJ, Bates FS, et al. Self-Assembly of Janus Dendrimers Into Uniform Dendrimersomes and Other Complex Architectures. Science. 2010;328(5981):1009–1014. doi: 10.1126/science.1185547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhang S, Sun H-J, Hughes AD, Moussodia R-O, Bertin A, Chen Y, Pochan DJ, Heiney PA, Klein ML, Percec V. Self- Assembly of Amphiphilic Janus Dendrimers Into Uniform Onion-Like Dendrimersomes with Predictable Size and Number of Bilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(25):9058–9063. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402858111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xiao Q, Wang Z, Williams D, Leowanawat P, Peterca M, Sherman SE, Zhang S, Hammer DA, Heiney PA, King SR, et al. Why Do Membranes of Some Unhealthy Cells Adopt a Cubic Architecture? ACS Cent Sci. 2016;2(12):943–953. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.6b00284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caminade A, Laurent R, Delavaux-Nicot B, Majoral J-P. “Janus” Dendrimers: Syntheses and Properties. New J Chem. 2012;36(2):217–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sherman SE, Xiao Q, Percec V. Mimicking Complex Biological Membranes and Their Programmable Glycan Ligands with Dendrimersomes and Glycodendrimersomes. Chem Rev. 2017;117(9):6538–6631. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang Y, Grayson SM. Approaches for the Preparation of Non- Linear Amphiphilic Polymers and Their Applications to Drug Delivery. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2012;64(9):852–865. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xiao Q, Yadavalli SS, Zhang S, Sherman SE, Fiorin E, da Silva L, Wilson DA, Hammer DA, Andŕe S, Gabius H-J, et al. Bioactive Cell-Like Hybrids Coassembled From (Glyco)- Dendrimersomes with Bacterial Membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(9):E1134–E1141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525589113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kim H, Leal C. Cuboplexes: Topologically Active siRNA Delivery. ACS Nano. 2015;9(10):10214–10226. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b03902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Leal C, Bouxsein NF, Ewert KK, Safinya CR. Highly Efficient Gene Silencing Activity of siRNA Embedded in a Nanostructured Gyroid Cubic Lipid Matrix. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(47):16841–16847. doi: 10.1021/ja1059763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Leal C, Ewert KK, Shirazi RS, Bouxsein NF, Safinya CR. Nanogyroids Incorporating Multivalent Lipids: Enhanced Membrane Charge Density and Pore Forming Ability for Gene Silencing. Langmuir. 2011;27(12):7691–7697. doi: 10.1021/la200679x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiao Q, Rubien JD, Wang Z, Reed EH, Hammer DA, Sahoo D, Heiney PA, Yadavalli SS, Goulian M, Wilner SE, et al. Self-Sorting and Coassembly of Fluorinated, Hydrogenated, and Hybrid Janus Dendrimers Into Dendrimersomes. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(38):12655–12663. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b08069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Xiao Q, Sherman SE, Wilner SE, Zhou X, Dazen C, Baumgart T, Reed EH, Hammer DA, Shinoda W, Klein ML, et al. Janus Dendrimersomes Coassembled From Fluorinated, Hydrogenated, and Hybrid Janus Dendrimers as Models for Cell Fusion and Fission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E7045–E7053. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708380114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Anderson D, Wennerstroem H, Olsson U. Isotropic Bicontinuous Solutions in Surfactant-Solvent Systems: the L3 Phase. J Phys Chem. 1989;93:4243–4253. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cho A, La Y, Jeoung S, Moon HR, Ryu J-H, Shin TJ, Kim KT. Mix-and-Match Assembly of Block Copolymer Blends in Solution. Macromolecules. 2017;50(8):3234–3243. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tajima K, Koshinuma M, Nakamura A, Gershfeld NL. Sponge–Vesicle Transformation in Binary Mixtures of Ionized Phospholipid Bilayers. Langmuir. 2000;16(6):2576–2580. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fukada K, Tajima K. Sponge Structures of Amphiphiles in Solution. In: Masahiko A, Scamehorn J, editors. Mixed Surfactant Systems. 2nd. Vol. 124. Marcel Dekker; New York: 2005. pp. 375–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McKenzie BE, Nudelman F, Bomans PHH, Holder SJ, Sommerdijk NAJM. Temperature-Responsive Nanospheres with Bicontinuous Internal Structures From a Semicrystalline Amphiphilic Block Copolymer. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(30):10256–10259. doi: 10.1021/ja102040u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hales K, Chen Z, Wooley KL, Pochan DJ. Nanoparticles with Tunable Internal Structure From Triblock Copolymers of PAA- B-PMA-B-PS. Nano Lett. 2008;8(7):2023–2026. doi: 10.1021/nl8013082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.He H, Rahimi K, Zhong M, Mourran A, Luebke DR, Nulwala HB, Möller M, Matyjaszewski K. Cubosomes From Hierarchical Self-Assembly of Poly(Ionic Liquid) Block Copolymers. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14057. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gotter M, Sottmann T, Baciu M, Olsson U, Wennerström H, Strey R. A Comprehensive, Time-Resolved SANS Investigation of Temperature-Change-Induced Sponge-to-Lamellar and Lamellar-to- Sponge Phase Transformations in Comparison with 2H -NMR Results. Eur Phys J E: Soft Matter Biol Phys. 2007;24(3):277–295. doi: 10.1140/epje/i2007-10238-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mitchell DJ, Tiddy GJT, Waring L, Bostock T, McDonald MP. Phase Behaviour of Polyoxyethylene Surfactants with Water. Mesophase Structures and Partial Miscibility (Cloud Points) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1. 1983;79(4):975–1000. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pincet F, Adrien V, Yang R, Delacotte J, Rothman JE, Urbach W, Tareste D. FRAP to Characterize Molecular Diffusion and Interaction in Various Membrane Environments. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Angelov B, Angelova A, Mutafchieva R, Lesieur S, Vainio U, Garamus VM, Jensen GV, Pedersen JS. SAXS Investigation of a Cubic to a Sponge (L3) Phase Transition in Self-Assembled Lipid Nanocarriers. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13(8):3073–3081. doi: 10.1039/c0cp01029d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barauskas J, Johnsson M, Tiberg F. Self-Assembled Lipid Superstructures: Beyond Vesicles and Liposomes. Nano Lett. 2005;5(8):1615–1619. doi: 10.1021/nl050678i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Freyssingeas É, Nallet F, Roux D. Measurement of the Membrane Flexibility in Lamellar and “Sponge” Phases of the C 12E 5/Hexanol/Water System. Langmuir. 1996;12(25):6028–6035. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Engström S, Wadsten-Hindrichsen P, Hernius B. Cubic, Sponge, and Lamellar Phases in the Glyceryl Monooleyl Ether- Propylene Glycol-Water System. Langmuir. 2007;23(20):10020–10025. doi: 10.1021/la701217b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maldonado A, Urbach W, Ober R, Langevin D. Swelling Behavior and Local Topology of an L3 (Sponge) Phase. Phys Rev E: Stat Phys, Plasmas, Fluids, Relat Interdiscip Top. 1996;54:1774. doi: 10.1103/physreve.54.1774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fontell K. The Structure of the Lamellar Liquid Crystalline Phase in Aerosol OT—Water System. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1973;44:318–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Filippi M, Martinelli J, Mulas G, Ferraretto M, Teirlinck E, Botta M, Tei L, Terreno E. Dendrimersomes: a New Vesicular Nano-Platform for MR-Molecular Imaging Applications. Chem Commun. 2014;50(26):3453–3456. doi: 10.1039/c3cc49584a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Filippi M, Patrucco D, Martinelli J, Botta M, Castro-Hartmann P, Tei L, Terreno E. Novel Stable Dendrimersome Formulation for Safe Bioimaging Applications. Nanoscale. 2015;7(30):12943–12954. doi: 10.1039/c5nr02695d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Nummelin S, Selin M, Legrand S, Ropponen J, Seitsonen J, Nykänen A, Koivisto J, Hirvonen J, Kostiainen MA, Bimbo LM. Modular Synthesis of Self-Assembling Janus-Dendrimers and Facile Preparation of Drug-Loaded Dendrimersomes. Nanoscale. 2017;9(21):7189–7198. doi: 10.1039/c6nr08102a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Filippi M, Catanzaro V, Patrucco D, Botta M, Tei L, Terreno E. First in Vivo MRI Study on Theranostic Dendrimersomes. J Controlled Release. 2017;248:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lamour G, Hamraoui A, Buvailo A, Xing Y, Keuleyan S, Prakash V, Eftekhari-Bafrooei A, Borguet E. Contact Angle Measurements Using a Simplified Experimental Setup. J Chem Educ. 2010;87(12):1403–1407. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shikata T, Okuzono M, Sugimoto N. Temperature- Dependent Hydration/Dehydration Behavior of Poly(Ethylene Oxide)S in Aqueous Solution. Macromolecules. 2013;46(5):1956–1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Magazu S. NMR, Static and Dynamic Light and Neutron Scattering Investigations on Polymeric Aqueous Solutions. J Mol Struct. 2000;523:47–59. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lutz JF, Hoth A. Preparation of Ideal PEG Analogues with a Tunable Thermosensitivity by Controlled Radical Copolymerization of 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)Ethyl Methacrylate and Oligo(Ethylene Glycol) Methacrylate. Macromolecules. 2006;39(2):893–896. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cui Q, Wu F, Wang E. Thermosensitive Behavior of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Based Block Copolymer (PEG-B-PADMO) Controlled via Self-Assembled Microstructure. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115(19):5913–5922. doi: 10.1021/jp200659u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Keating CD. Aqueous Phase Separation as a Possible Route to Compartmentalization of Biological Molecules. Acc Chem Res. 2012;45(12):2114–2124. doi: 10.1021/ar200294y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li Y, Lipowsky R, Dimova R. Transition From Complete to Partial Wetting Within Membrane Compartments. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(37):12252–12253. doi: 10.1021/ja8048496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Long MS, Cans A-S, Keating CD. Budding and Asymmetric Protein Microcompartmentation in Giant Vesicles Containing Two Aqueous Phases. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130(2):756–762. doi: 10.1021/ja077439c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kang M, Huang G, Leal C. Role of Lipid Polymorphism in Acoustically Sensitive Liposomes. Soft Matter. 2014;10(44):8846–8854. doi: 10.1039/c4sm01431f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kneidl B, Peller M, Winter G, Lindner LH, Hossann M. Thermosensitive Liposomal Drug Delivery Systems: State of the Art Review. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9(1):4387–4398. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S49297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Viglianti BL, Dewhirst MW, Boruta RJ, Park JY, Landon C, Fontanella AN, Guo J, Manzoor A, Hofmann CL, Palmer GM. Systemic Anti-Tumour Effects of Local Thermally Sensitive Liposome Therapy. Int J Hyperthermia. 2014;30(6):385–392. doi: 10.3109/02656736.2014.944587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lencioni R, Cioni D. RFA Plus Lyso-Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin: in Search of the Optimal Approach to Cure Intermediate-Size Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Hepat Oncol. 2016;3(3):193–200. doi: 10.2217/hep-2016-0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yaghmur A, Laggner P, Zhang S, Rappolt M. Tuning Curvature and Stability of Monoolein Bilayers by Designer Lipid-Like Peptide Surfactants. PLoS One. 2007;2:e479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cho A, La Y, Shin TJ, Park C, Kim KT. Structural Requirements of Block Copolymers for Self-Assembly Into Inverse Bicontinuous Cubic Mesophases in Solution. Macromolecules. 2016;49(12):4510–4519. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.An TH, La Y, Cho A, Jeong MG, Shin TJ, Park C, Kim KT. Solution Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers Containing a Branched Hydrophilic Block Into Inverse Bicontinuous Cubic Mesophases. ACS Nano. 2015;9(3):3084–3096. doi: 10.1021/nn507338s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES