Skip to main content
IDCases logoLink to IDCases
. 2018 Mar 24;12:76–79. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2018.03.017

Fatal breakthrough mucormycosis in a multivisceral transplant patient receiving micafungin: Case report and literature review

John R Louis-Auguste a,, Christianne Micallef b, Tim Ambrose c, Sara Upponi d, Andrew J Butler e, Dunecan Massey c, Stephen J Middleton c, Neil Russell e, Charlotte S Rutter f, Lisa M Sharkey c, Jeremy Woodward c, Effrossyni Gkrania-Klotsas g, David A Enoch b
PMCID: PMC6010962  PMID: 29942755

Abstract

Introduction

Antifungal agents are routinely used in the post-transplant setting for both prophylaxis and treatment of presumed and proven fungal infections. Micafungin is an echinocandin-class antifungal with broad antifungal cover and favorable side effect profile but, notably, it has no activity against molds of the order Mucorales.

Presentation of case

A 47-year-old woman underwent multivisceral transplantation for intestinal failure-associated liver disease. She had a prolonged post-operative recovery complicated by invasive candidiasis and developed an intolerance to liposomal amphotericin B. In view of her immunosuppression, she was commenced on micafungin as prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal infection. However, she developed acute graft versus host disease with bone marrow failure complicated by disseminated mucormycosis which was only diagnosed post mortem.

Discussion

Non-Aspergillus breakthrough mold infections with micafungin therapy are rare with only eight other cases having been described in the literature. Breakthrough infections have occurred within one week of starting micafungin. Diagnosis is problematic and requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and microscopic/histological examination of an involved site. The management of these aggressive infections involves extensive debridement and appropriate antifungal cover.

Conclusion

A high level of suspicion of invasive fungal infection is required at all times in immunosuppressed patients, even those receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Early biopsy is required. Even with early recognition and aggressive treatment of these infections, prognosis is poor.

Abbreviations: bd, twice daily; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CT, computed tomography scan; GvHD, graft-versus-host disease; L-AmB, liposomal amphotericin B; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; od, once daily; spp., species

Keywords: Antifungal therapy, Micafungin, Mucormycosis, Multivisceral transplantation, Immunosuppression, Fungal infection

Introduction

Solid organ transplant recipients are at risk of opportunistic bacterial, viral, parasitic and fungal infections. Broad spectrum antimicrobial agents are often used for prophylaxis and treatment of opportunistic infections post-transplant.

Micafungin is a broad spectrum echinocandin class antifungal agent. Echinocandins uniquely target the fungal cell wall, giving them a favorable side effect profile. Micafungin has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against all major Candida species, Aspergillus species and less common pathogens such as Paecilomyces and Penicillium. However, it has no activity against Cryptococcus spp. and members of the order Mucorales.

Breakthrough infections are a recognized complication of therapy with any antimicrobial agent, but are an uncommon feature of micafungin use. Here we present a case and review the literature of all breakthrough non-Aspergillus mold infections described with the use of micafungin.

Case

A 47-year-old woman with cirrhosis due to intestinal failure associated liver disease was referred for multivisceral transplantation. Multiple small bowel resections due to visceral myopathy resulted in short bowel syndrome, small intestinal bacterial overgrowth and gastrointestinal dysmotility. A liver biopsy after four years of parenteral nutrition confirmed advanced cirrhosis and multivisceral transplantation (stomach, liver, pancreas, small bowel and colon) was indicated.

Both donor and recipient were cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG negative. Induction immunosuppression consisted of methylprednisolone followed by alemtuzumab (anti-CD52). Maintenance immunosuppression initially consisted of a reducing course of prednisolone and tacrolimus. Tacrolimus was replaced by cyclosporine on day 40 due to posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.

Initial recipient antimicrobial prophylaxis consisted of meropenem, vancomycin, liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) 1 mg/kg od, co-trimoxazole 480 mg three times a week and acyclovir, as per our institutional protocol. On day 3 Candida glabrata was isolated from blood cultures and drain fluid. The dose of L-AmB was increased to 3 mg/kg/day. This was switched to voriconazole after she developed a cutaneous drug reaction.

Through her admission there was a prolonged period of pyrexia and intermittent bacteremia. Positive blood cultures included enterococci, Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, and Escherichia coli, but there was no fungemia. Voriconazole was switched to micafungin 100 mg od due to low serum voriconazole levels (secondary to drug interactions) on day 96, which was subsequently increased to 100 mg bd due to lack of clinical response.

On day 79 a diffuse maculopapular rash was noted. Skin biopsy demonstrated graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Peripheral blood chimerism analysis demonstrated 96% donor-positive lymphocytes. She suffered from rapid and irreversible bone marrow failure from day 90 which required frequent red cell and platelet transfusions. Bone marrow examination was acellular, consistent with GvHD. Immunosuppression was initially increased with further doses of high-dose methylprednisolone, basiliximab (anti-IL-2), and alemtuzumab with no response. Immunosuppression was withdrawn on day 120, again with no response. A haplo-identical bone marrow transplant from a relative was planned for day 168.

A granulocyte infusion was given as bridging therapy to control the sepsis pending bone marrow transplant on day 164 which was associated with a platelet increment to >130 × 109/L. She was also noted to have developed dysarthria with unilateral isolated upper motor neurone facial nerve palsy prior to the infusion. Cranial computed tomography scan (CT) (performed after the granulocyte infusion) confirmed an acute frontal infarct. Over the next 24 h she deteriorated rapidly and was transferred to the intensive care unit. Repeat CT of head, chest, abdomen and pelvis (Fig. 1) revealed extensive and catastrophic infarcts involving both kidneys, bowel and liver, a large new cerebral infarct, and extension of her established cerebral infarct with hemorrhagic transformation and significant edema and midline shift. Treatment was withdrawn and she died soon after.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A. CT abdomen at day 165 showing poor enhancement of the liver with heterogeneous attenuation of the right lobe, gas in the left renal vein (long arrow) and infarcts in the right kidney (short arrow). B. CT head at day 165 showing extensive bilateral cerebral infarction (long arrows), left fronto-parietal hemorrhage (short arrow) and mass effect within the left cerebral hemisphere.

Post mortem examination revealed extensive invasive mucormycosis diagnosed histopathologically, affecting the vasculature as well as parenchyma of her lungs, brain, heart and liver, and a left ventricular fungal thrombus. Following discontinuation of L-AmB and voriconazole, she received micafungin for a total of 69 days. There had been no time without antifungal coverage. Apart from the early Candida isolates, fungal cultures and serum galactomannan levels had been negative throughout her illness.

Methods

PubMed was searched using the search string ‘(micafungin AND Aspergillus breakthrough [Title/Abstract]) OR (micafungin AND rhizopus [Title/Abstract]) OR (micafungin AND zygomycetes) OR ‘(micafungin AND Mucor [Title/Abstract]) OR (micafungin AND Rhizopus [Title/Abstract]) OR (micafungin AND Absidia [Title/Abstract]) OR (Cunninghamella AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Rhizomucor AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Lichtheimia AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Apophysomyces AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Basidiobolus AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Conidiobolus AND micafungin [Title/Abstract])’, OR (Scedosporium AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) OR (Fusarium AND micafungin [Title/Abstract]) and the articles cited therein in articles written in English for the period January 1997 to December 2017.

Three authors (DE, CM & JLA) then read the articles and included all clinical cases of breakthrough infection with molds whilst the patient was receiving micafungin.

Discussion

Invasive fungal infections are known to occur in over 10% of intestinal transplant recipients in recent series [1]. In solid organ transplant recipients in general, the majority of fungal infections are due to Candida or Aspergillus [1], for which both amphotericin B and micafungin provide adequate coverage. In this case micafungin was chosen to provide prophylaxis while she was neutropenic, due to her intolerance to amphotericin B and interactions with voriconazole, though this is not a licensed indication [2]. It is likely that Mucor was selected by micafungin use.

Mucor is a genus of opportunistic environmental molds which classically causes angioinvasive infections in immunocompromised patients. Mucormycosis is frequently fatal even with prompt diagnosis, appropriate therapy and aggressive debridement [3]. Diagnosis requires a high degree of clinical suspicion and often requires histopathological examination and culture of involved tissue, as routine cultures are often negative [3]. Amphotericin B has the best evidence base, although isavuconazole and posaconazole are alternatives [4,5]. Although monotherapy is not a therapeutic option, micafungin may be considered as add-on therapy due to synergistic properties [6]. Micafungin has limited in vitro activity [i.e. minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] >4 mg/L] against the mucoraceous molds, Fusarium solani, Pseudallescheria boydii and molds with holoblastic conidia (e.g. Aureobasidium spp. and Alternaria spp.) [7]. Susceptibility data should therefore ideally be obtained before starting therapy [8].

Breakthrough infections due to non-Aspergillus molds on micafungin remain rare (Table 1), with only nine other cases previously reported [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]]. Other than three case reports, six cases were identified during the course of clinical trials involving almost 700 neutropenic patients receiving micafungin for treatment [10] or prophylaxis [9,14]. Of the eight patients for whom information is available, seven were receiving immunosuppressive therapy; the other was diabetic. Exposure to micafungin varied from 6 days to >3 months. Conversely, several large multicenter studies of patients receiving micafungin have been published, predominantly from Japan which showed no breakthrough infections due to these molds [[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]].

Table 1.

Mold breakthrough cases during micafungin therapy [other than Aspergillus spp.].

Ref. Year Country n Organism Method of identification Age/sex Underlying condition BDG Immuno-suppression Site of infection Daily dose [mg] Duration of therapy [total dose] Outcome
This case 2014 UK 1 Mucormycetes Histology – post mortem 47/F MVT, GvHD, visceral myopathy N/A MMF, CYA, steroids lung, brain, heart, liver 100–200 69d [10500 mg] Died
[12] 2009 Japan 1 Mucormycetes Histology – post mortem 69/M AML, DM Neg DA, Prednisolone bowel 150 13d [1950 mg] Died
[9] 2004 USA 1 Mucormycetes u/k u/k HSCT u/k u/k u/k 50 u/k u/k
[10] 2010 USA 1 Mucormycetes u/k u/k Febrile neutropenia u/k u/k u/k 100 u/k u/k
[14] 2015 Austria 1 Mucormycetes u/k u/k Acute leukemia u/k u/k lung 50 16d [800 mg] u/k
[14] 2015 Austria 1 Lichtheimia corymbifera Histology – post mortem u/k Acute leukemia u/k u/k Lung, skin, brain 50 6d [300 mg] Died
[14] 2015 Austria 1 Aureobasidium spp. u/k u/k Acute leukemia u/k u/k Soft tissue 50 24d [1200 mg] u/k
[14] 2015 Austria 1 Hormographiella aspergillata u/k u/k Acute leukemia u/k u/k Lung, skin 50 30d [1500 mg] u/k
[11] 2013 Japan 1 Scedosporium aurantiacum Culture 68/F DM Pos Nil lung, brain 150 16d [2400 mg] Survived
[13] 2014 Japan 1 Scedosporium prolificans Culture 35/M Renal transplant Pos MMF, steroids, Tac lung, brain, heart valve, blood 150 >3 months Died

Key: AML: acute myeloid leukemia; BDG: β-D-glucan; CYA: cyclosporine; d: days; DA: cytarabine – daunarubicin; DM: diabetes mellitus; F: female; GvHD: graft versus host disease; HSCT: hemopoietic stem cell transplant; M: male; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; MVT: multivisceral transplant; N/A: not applicable; Neg: negative; Pos: positive; Tac: Tacrolimus; u/k: unknown; UK: United Kingdom USA: United States of America.

Positive fungal culture or histology remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Serological markers [e.g. β-d glucan/galactomannan] are often negative even in overwhelming infection [12]. One of the recognized limitations of β-d glucan is that it remains negative in patients with infections due to mucormycetes and Cryptococcus [2], whilst galactomannan, a constituent of the cell wall of Aspergillus and Penicillium should also remain negative as it’s not a component of these fungi. Clinical features were non-specific in all cases and were catastrophic in ours.

In conclusion, non-Aspergillus non-Candida breakthrough infections can occur within two weeks of starting micafungin and usually occur in immunocompromised hosts. A high clinical index of suspicion is required due to a non-specific presentation. Clinicians should be aware of the limitations of antifungal use generally and the limitations of current screening and diagnostic testing algorithms for detecting fungal infections in immunosuppressed individuals. Early biopsy is therefore the most useful investigation in these patients. Unfortunately, even with prompt recognition and aggressive surgical and antimicrobial therapy, these infections are often fatal.

Contributions

JR Louis-Auguste: Concept and design of the paper; performed literature search; drafted and revised the manuscript.

C Micallef: Concept and design of the paper; performed literature search; drafted and revised the manuscript.

T Ambrose: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

S Upponi: Revised the manuscript; provided and interpreted radiological images.

AJ Butler: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

D Massey: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

SJ Middleton: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

N Russell: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

CS Rutter: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

LM Sharkey: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

J Woodward: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

E Gkrania-Klotsas: Concept and design of the paper; revised the manuscript.

DA Enoch: Concept and design of the paper; performed literature search; drafted and revised the manuscript.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient’s next of kin for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Conflict of interest statement

DAE has received funding to attend conferences from MSD, Gilead and Astellas. CR has received funding from Norgine, Shire and Astellas to attend scientific conferences; Dr Falk and Shire for invited presentations; Nutricia for sponsorship of local educational courses. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgement

None.

References

  • 1.Primeggia J., Matsumoto C.S., Fishbein T.M., Karacki P.S., Fredette T.M., Timpone J.G. Infection among adult small bowel and multivisceral transplant recipients in the 30-day postoperative period. Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(5):441–448. doi: 10.1111/tid.12107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Enoch D.A., Idris S., Micallef C., Sule O., Karas J. Micafungin for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis. J Infect. 2014;68(6):507–526. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Prabhu R.M., Patel R. Mucormycosis and entomophthoramycosis: a review of the clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:31–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9465.2004.00843.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Enoch D.A., Aliyu S., Sule O., Lewis S., Karas J. Posaconazole for the treatment of mucormycosis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(6):465–473. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Marty F.M., Ostrosky-Zeichner L., Cornely O.A., Mullane K.M., Perfect J.R., Thompson G.R. Isavuconazole treatment for mucormycosis: a single-arm open-label trial and case-control analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;(March) doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00071-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rodríguez M.M., Calvo E., Serena C., Mariné M., Pastor F.J., Guarro J. Effects of double and triple combinations of antifungal drugs in a murine model of disseminated infection by Scedosporium prolificans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(5):2153–2155. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01477-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cuenca-Estrella M., Gomez-Lopez A., Mellado E., Monzon A., Buitrago M.J., Rodriguez-Tudela J.L. Activity profile in vitro of micafungin against Spanish clinical isolates of common and emerging species of yeasts and molds. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53(5):2192–2195. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01543-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lackner M., de Hoog G.S., Verweij P.E., Najafzadeh M.J., Curfs-Breuker I., Klaassen C.H. Species-specific antifungal susceptibility patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(5):2635–2642. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05910-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Burik J.-A.H., Ratanatharathorn V., Stepan D.E., Miller C.B., Lipton J.H., Vesole D.H. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(10):1407–1416. doi: 10.1086/422312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kubiak D.W., Bryar J.M., McDonnell A.M., Delgado-Flores J.O., Mui E., Baden L.R. Evaluation of caspofungin or micafungin as empiric antifungal therapy in adult patients with persistent febrile neutropenia: a retrospective, observational, sequential cohort analysis. Clin Ther. 2010;32(4):637–648. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakamura Y., Suzuki N., Nakajima Y., Utsumi Y., Murata O., Nagashima H. Scedosporium aurantiacum brain abscess after near-drowning in a survivor of a tsunami in Japan. Respir Investig. 2013;51(4):207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Suzuki K., Sugawara Y., Sekine T., Nakase K., Katayama N. Breakthrough disseminated zygomycosis induced massive gastrointestinal bleeding in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia receiving micafungin. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15(1):42–45. doi: 10.1007/s10156-008-0657-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Uno K., Kasahara K., Kutsuna S., Katanami Y., Yamamoto Y., Maeda K. Infective endocarditis and meningitis due to Scedosporium prolificans in a renal transplant recipient. J Infect Chemother. 2014;20(2):131–133. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2013.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nachbaur D., Angelova O., Orth-Höller D., Ditlbacher A., Lackner M., Auberger J. Primary antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin in patients with haematological malignancies: real-life data from a retrospective single-centre observational study. Eur J Haematol. 2015;94(3):258–264. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chan T.S.Y., Hwang Y.-Y., Gill H., Cheung W.W.W., Tse E., Leung A.Y.H. Antifungal drug usage in haematologic patients during a 4-year period in an Asian university teaching hospital. Intern Med J. 2013;43(5):541–546. doi: 10.1111/imj.12064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goto N., Hara T., Tsurumi H., Ogawa K., Kitagawa J., Kanemura N. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for treating febrile neutropenia in hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol. 2010;85(11):872–876. doi: 10.1002/ajh.21858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kobayashi R., Suzuki N., Yoshida M., Iizuka S., Suzuki D., Sano H. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for febrile neutropenia in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies: a multicenter prospective study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2013;35(7):e276–279. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318299c6bd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vehreschild M.J.G.T., von Bergwelt-Baildon M., Tran L., Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A., Wisplinghoff H., Bangard C. Feasibility and effectiveness of posaconazole prophylaxis in combination with micafungin bridging for patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a 6-yr analysis from the cologne cohort for neutropenic patients. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93(5):400–406. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yamaguchi M., Kurokawa T., Ishiyama K., Aoki G., Ueda M., Matano S. Efficacy and safety of micafungin as an empirical therapy for invasive fungal infections in patients with hematologic disorders: a multicenter, prospective study. Ann Hematol. 2011;90(10):1209–1217. doi: 10.1007/s00277-011-1277-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan T.S.Y., Gill H., Hwang Y.-Y., Sim J., Tse A.C.T., Loong F. Breakthrough invasive fungal diseases during echinocandin treatment in high-risk hospitalized hematologic patients. Ann Hematol. 2014;93(3):493–498. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1882-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from IDCases are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES