Abstract
A simple, high yield, two-step synthesis yields a porphyrin dimer linked by a flexible dithiol tether that preferentially binds fullerene C70 over C60 in toluene solution. The complex forms stable aggregates when cast on glass.
Porphyrins are known to closely associate with the curved surface of fullerenes both in solution and as co-crystals.1 These systems are used extensively in the creation of donor–acceptor materials to study charge separated states as part of artificial photosynthetic materials. The chemical stability and tuneable photonic properties of the p-type porphyrins couple well with the electronic properties of the n-type fullerenes to form nearly ideal donor–acceptor systems.
Covalently linked porphyrin/fullerene donor–acceptor systems have also served asmodel systems for the study of electron transfer for over 20 years.2 Many groups have synthesized covalently linked porphyrin/fullerene systems with diverse architectures that demonstrated functionalities that can be potentially used in the development of optoelectronic devices.3–10 In general, as the architectural complexity and added functional entities of the donor–acceptor target increases, the synthetic yield decreases. Rigorously synthesized and carefully designed systems with rigid tethers are examples.11,12 High yield coupling and click-type reactions provide access to some porphyrin/fullerene systems with better yields.13 Supramolecular approaches can mitigate synthetic complications, but one drawback of molecular designs with covalent, coordination,14 hydrogen bonding,15 and electrostatic16 tethers is that derivatives of fullerenes are usually not as good acceptor motifs as the parent fullerene.17
Supramolecular approaches to porphyrin systems that bind the underivatized fullerene can result in materials with similar or better photonic functionalities.18–23 Synthesis of the fullerene hosts range from simple to complex, but the former have greater commercial potential. The porphyrin dimer described in this investigation is synthesized by a simple two-step procedure in high yield (Scheme 1).
Scheme 1.
Reagents and conditions: i: reflux in propionic acid, separate isomers; ii: metalation with Zn(OAc)2 in CHCl3/CH3OH followed by addition of pentane-1,5-dithiol in DMF‡
The free base (1H) and zinc(II) (1Zn) dimers are designed with a flexible α,ω-dithiol alkane linker to allow for an induced-fit, sandwich type binding of fullerenes such as C60, C70 (Fig. 1), and single wall carbon nanotubes. The inclusion of the perfluorophenyl linker allows for easy dimerization by simple click-type substitution reactions with thioalkanes and may help promote interaction with the conjugated pi system of the chosen fullerene molecule.24 The modular design allows the length of the linker to be easily varied by substituting the pentane dithiol with any of the numerous commercially available dithioalkanes.
Fig. 1.

MM2 calculated structure of 1H and C70 where grey = C, blue = N, yellow = F, and orange= S, and H are left out for clarity.
In toluene, the 1H and 1Zn dimers complex fullerene C70 greater than 10-fold better than C60 (Table 1).§ UV-visible and fluorescence titrations of the fullerenes into solutions of the dimers reveal systematic red shifts in the former and quenching in the latter. Values for K in Table 1 were calculated from the slope of Stern–Volmer plots (e.g. fluorescence data in Fig. 2), and competition experiments, wherein the dimers were titrated with a ~ 1 : 1 mixture of C60:C70, indicate that the dimer preferentially binds C70 more than 10-fold better than C60. 1Zn demonstrated a binding constant of 1.1 × 104 M−1, which is competitive with much more synthetically demanding molecules.
Table 1.
Binding constants for 1H, 1Zn and for several reported fullerene binding porphyrinic compounds in toluene
| Host | KC60/M−1 | KC70/M−1 | KC70/KC60 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPF | 5.0 × 102 | 3.7 × 103 | 7.4 | this work |
| 1H | 7.1 × 102 | 8.9 × 103 | 12.5 | this work |
| 1Zn | 8.0 × 102 | 1.1 × 104 | 13.8 | this work |
| cyclic H2Por | 7.94 × 105 | 1.58 × 107 | 19.9 | 1a |
| cyclic ZnPor | 6.31 × 105 | 2.00 × 107 | 31.7 | 1a |
| jaws H2Por | 5.20 × 103 | — | — | 1a |
| jaws ZnPor | 1.95 × 103 | — | — | 1a |
| calix. H2Por | 4.92 × 103 | 2.11 × 104 | 4.29 | 11 |
| calix. ZnPor | 8.6 × 103 | 2.80 × 104 | 3.26 | 11 |
Also references therein, see ESI for structures.
Fig. 2.
Fluorescence emission spectra of a titration of (left) C60 and (right) C70 into 10 μM 1Zn solution in toluene. Both graphs show quenching of the porphyrin excited state, but the effect due to C70 is much more significant. The solutions were excited at 417 nm
The UV-visible absorption spectra (Fig. S1–S6‡) of both 1H and 1Zn show a small but real ground state interaction with C70 indicated by a decrease and slight redshift of the Soret peak. This is illustrated in the insets to Fig. S1–S6‡, which plot the difference between the predicted and observed absorbance of the combined solutions as a function of fullerene concentration. For the monomeric compounds and the titration of C60 for the dimer, no such effect is observed.
Steady state fluorescence measurements demonstrate fullerene quenching of the porphyrin excited state (Fig. 1, S7, S8‡). Stern–Volmer plots (Fig. S9‡) show greater quenching by C70 than by C60 for all species studied. The porphyrin fluorescence lifetimes measured by time correlated single photon counting experiments show virtually no change (9 ns for 1H and 2 ns for 1Zn in toluene excited at 425 nm), and a static quenching mechanism is indicated. Assuming there is no significant difference in the nature of energy transfer from the various fluorophore species, and expecting that complexation behaviour is driven by van der Waals forces with small contributions from electrostatics and coordinate bonding, we conclude that the greater quenching observed in the case of the C70 can be attributed to a stronger interaction due to the larger, flatter surface in the equatorial region of the fullerene molecule.25 We have done these studies in toluene to compare to published data, but solvation of both the dimer and the fullerenes diminish the intermolecular interactions, and more polar solvents may enhance complexation.26
To study the system in the solid state, films were prepared on ozone cleaned glass by drop casting from toluene solutions of fullerene, fullerene and 1H, fullerene plus 1Zn, or pure 1. The resulting films were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Solutions of 1 and C70 form 3–5 nm films of the supramolecular material when cast on clean glass surfaces (Fig. 3). A few islands of larger aggregates of the materials are also observed. Monomeric porphyrins form simple aggregates on the glass surface. Pure 0.5 mMC70 solutions cast on the glass form large nanoaggregates, while solutions of pure C60 form long narrow rods. Lower concentrations form sparse films. When combined with 1, the dimensions of the C60 aggregates remain constant but are more uniformly dispersed aggregates. The self-organized films demonstrate the increased affinity of 1 to C70 but the architecture of themolecules in the films may be different than in solution. TEM studies of the films show similar morphologies and the energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis clearly shows the Zn in films of 1Zn:C70. There are three possible supramolecular structures consistent with the AFM heights: the sandwich-type complex shown in Fig. 1, the C70 sitting on top of a closed dimer where the porphyrins are cofacially pi-stacked, and two open dimers sandwiching two C70 (see supporting information‡).
Fig. 3.
Left: AFMof a 1 : 1 1Zn: C70 (10 μMeach in toluene) cast onto ozone cleaned glass shows a ~ 4 nm thick film with larger 10–25 nm high islands of the fullerene complexed by the dimer. Right: histogram of particle sizes.
Carbon nanotubes share many of the interesting properties of fullerenes and have also been extensively used in porphyrin based D/A systems.27–29 When THF solutions of 1 were incubated with large excess of single walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT), sonicated for 10 min and centrifuged at 8 000 RPM for 10 min. UV-visible spectra show small red shifts in the dimer. The supernatant demonstrated similar fluorescence quenching and UV spectral changes to the experiments with the fullerene C70, indicating that the dimer interacts favourably with the larger SWCNT.
In summary, simple porphyrin dimers with flexible linkers can bind fullerenes, and this molecular design allows rapid synthesis of molecules with different tethers to evaluate other supramolecular design principles. Future studies will include synthesis of differently tethered dimers, and characterization of the dimer interaction with SWCNT. These synthetically scalable dimers may be used as a means for purifying crude fullerene mixtures. The photophysical data indicates electron transfer from the porphyrin donor to the C70 acceptor. Nanoscale films of the supramolecular complex are similarly quenched. If porphyrin-fullerene films are to reach potential applications,30–38 scalability is a central issue.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF CHE-0847997 and 0848602 to CMD). Hunter College science infrastructure is supported by the NSF, grants from the National Center for Research Resources (G12 RR003037) and the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (8G12 MD007599) from the National Institutes of Health, and the City University of New York.
Footnotes
This article is part of the ChemComm ‘Porphyrins and phthalocyanines’ web themed issue.
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: experimental details, UV-visible, fluorescence, AFM, TEM, EDAX. See DOI: 10.1039/c2cc31340e
For each of the porphyrins investigated: the free base dimer (1H), the metalloporphyrin dimer (1Zn), and the monomeric control: tri-5-10-15-phenyl-20-perfluoropheynlporphyrin (MPF); solutions of the desired concentration were prepared first and titrated with solutions containing C60 or C70. Care was taken to ensure a constant porphyrin concentration throughout the titration. AFM samples were prepared by dropcasting from toluene solutions on to ozone cleaned glass slides. Nanotubes were an average of 1 μm in length and 0.7–1 nm in diameter and were of 99% purity. In the experiments with SWCNT, the precipitate, which is likely a complex of the SWCNT and the dimer species, has not yet been characterized.
References
- 1.Boyd PDW, Reed CA. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38:235–242. doi: 10.1021/ar040168f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baran PS, Monaco RR, Khan AU, Schuster DI, Wilson SR. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:8363–8364. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhattacharya S, Tominaga K, Kimura T, Uno H, Komatsu N. Chem Phys Lett. 2007;433:395–402. [Google Scholar]
- 4.He L, Zhu YZ, Zheng JY, Ma YF, Chen YS. J Photochem Photobiol, A. 2010;216:15–23. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liddell PA, Kodis G, Kuciauskas D, Andreasson J, Moore AL, Moore TA, Gust D. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2004;6:5509–5515. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mukherjee S, Bauri AK, Bhattacharya S. Chem Phys Lett. 2010;500:128–139. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tamaki K, Imahori H, Sakata Y, Nishimura Y, Yamazaki I. Chem Commun. 1999:625–626. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Umeyama T, Tezuka N, Kawashima F, Seki S, Matano Y, Nakao Y, Shishido T, Nishi M, Hirao K, Lehtivuori H, Tkachenko NV, Lemmetyinen H, Imahori H. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:4615–4619. doi: 10.1002/anie.201007065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Y, Yu Y, Jiang Z, Xu H, Wang Z, Zhang X, Oda M, Ishizuka T, Jiang D, Chi L, Fuchs H. Langmuir. 2009;25:6627–6632. doi: 10.1021/la901360c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu ZQ, Shao XB, Li C, Hou JL, Wang K, Jiang XK, Li ZT. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:17460–17468. doi: 10.1021/ja056509h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dudic M, Lhotak P, Stibor I, Petrickova H, Lang K. New J Chem. 2004;28:85–90. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shoji Y, Tashiro K, Aida T. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:6570–6571. doi: 10.1021/ja0489947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jakob M, Berg A, Levanon H, Schuster DI, Megiatto JD. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115:24555–24563. doi: 10.1021/jp202008j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wilson SR, MacMahon S, Tat FT, Jarowski PD, Schuster DI. Chem Commun. 2003:226–227. doi: 10.1039/b208013c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sessler JL, Jayawickramarajah J, Gouloumis A, Torres T, Guldi DM, Maldonado S, Stevenson KJ. Chem Commun. 2005:1892–1894. doi: 10.1039/b418345b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.D’Souza F, Chitta R, Gadde S, Zandler ME, Sandanayaka ASD, Araki Y, Ito O. Chem Commun. 2005:1279–1281. doi: 10.1039/b416736h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Echegoyen L, Echegoyen LE. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:593–601. [Google Scholar]
- 18.D’Souza F, Ito O. Chem Commun. 2009:4913–4928. doi: 10.1039/b905753f. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 19.Drain CM, Nifiatis F, Vasenko A, Batteas JD. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:2344–2347. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19980918)37:17<2344::AID-ANIE2344>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Varotto A, Todaro L, Vinodu M, Koehne J, Liu G-y, Drain CM. Chem Commun. 2008:4921–4923. doi: 10.1039/b806795c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Drain CM, Varotto A, Radivojevic I. Chem Rev. 2009;109:1630–1658. doi: 10.1021/cr8002483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mulholland AR, Woodward CP, Langford SJ. Chem Commun. 2011;47:1494–1496. doi: 10.1039/c0cc04474a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Babu SS, Mohwald H, Nakanishi T. Chem Soc Rev. 2010;39:4021–4035. doi: 10.1039/c000680g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Coates GW, Dunn AR, Henling LM, Ziller JW, Lobkovsky EB, Grubbs RH. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:3641–3649. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vilmercati P, Cudia CC, Larciprete R, Cepek C, Zampieri G, Sangaletti L, Pagliara S, Verdini A, Cossaro A, Floreano L, Morgante A, Petaccia L, Lizzit S, Battocchio C, Polzonetti G, Goldoni A. Surf Sci. 2006;600:4018–4023. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boyd PDW, Hodgson MC, Rickard CEF, Oliver AG, Chaker L, Brothers PJ, Bolskar RD, Tham FS, Reed CA. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121:10487–10495. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li H, Zhou B, Lin Y, Gu L, Wang W, Fernando KAS, Kumar S, Allard LF, Sun YP. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:1014–1015. doi: 10.1021/ja037142o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sgobba V, Rahman GMA, Guldi DM, Jux N, Campidelli S, Prato M. Adv Mater. 2006;18:2264–2269. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tasis D, Tagmatarchis N, Bianco A, Prato M. Chem Rev. 2006;106:1105–1136. doi: 10.1021/cr050569o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ariga K, Hill JP, Ji Q. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007;9:2319–2340. doi: 10.1039/b700410a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ariga K, Sakakibara K, Richards GJ, Hill JP. Supramol Chem. 2011;23:183–194. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sakakibara K, Hill JP, Ariga K. Small. 2011;7:1288–1308. doi: 10.1002/smll.201002350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim D. Multiporphyrin Arrays: Fundamentals and Applications. CRC Press; Boca Raton: 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Radivojevic I, Varotto A, Farley C, Drain CM. Energy Environ Sci. 2010;3:1897–1909. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jurow M, Schuckman AE, Batteas JD, Drain CM. Coord Chem Rev. 2010;254:2297–2310. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Drain CM, Smeureanu G, Patel S, Gong XC, Garno J, Arijeloye J. New J Chem. 2006;30:1834–1843. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Drain CM, Bazzan G, Milic T, Vinodu M, Goeltz JC. Isr J Chem. 2005;45:255–269. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Drain CM, Batteas JD, Flynn GW, Milic T, Chi N, Yablon DG, Sommers H. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6498–6502. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012521899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



