Skip to main content
Neuro-Oncology logoLink to Neuro-Oncology
. 2018 Jun 22;20(Suppl 2):i128. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy059.445

MBCL-49. PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF MOLECULAR SUBGROUPS OF MEDULLOBLASTOMA IN CHILDREN RECEIVING IRRADIATION-SPARING REGIMENS

Kee Kiat Yeo 1, Ashley Margol 1, Rebekah Kennedy 2, Long Hung 2, Nathan Robison 1, Girish Dhall 1, Shahab Asgharzadeh 1,2
PMCID: PMC6012113

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy, while a mainstay of medulloblastoma treatment, is associated with significant age-dependent neurocognitive morbidity in children. Relatively little is known about the subgroup-specific outcome of infants and young children with medulloblastoma treated with irradiation-sparing regimens.

METHODS

Infants and young children <10 years of age with medulloblastoma treated with irradiation-sparing regimens (Head Start, COG-99703, or others) at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles since 1980 were identified. Molecular subgroup was determined using a 31-gene TaqMan Low Density Array signature. Survival analyses were conducted based on 4 molecular subgroups (WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4).

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with medulloblastoma were identified, with five excluded from survival analysis secondary to non-cancer related deaths. Of these 71 patients, 30 did not receive irradiation as part of their upfront therapy. These patients were divided into SHH (n=17), Group 3 (n=3) and Group 4 subgroups (n=10), with no WNT subgroup identified. Median age at diagnosis was 2.16 (range:0.24-9.80) years. 5-year progression-free survival rates for SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 for this irradiation-sparing cohort were 76.5%±10.3%, 0% and 0%, respectively; 5-year overall survival rates for SHH, Group 3 and Group 4 were 94.0%±5.7%, 0% and 26.7%±15.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was a marked difference in outcome among infants/young children with SHH medulloblastoma vs Group 3/4 medulloblastoma treated with irradiation-sparing regimens. Most patients <10 years of age with SHH medulloblastoma were treated effectively with irradiation-sparing regimens, with high salvageability among those who progressed. Group 3/4 medulloblastoma patients treated without irradiation had extremely poor outcome.


Articles from Neuro-Oncology are provided here courtesy of Society for Neuro-Oncology and Oxford University Press

RESOURCES