Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2018 Jun 21;6(25):e00534-18. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00534-18

Draft Genome Sequence of Serratia sp. Strain S1B, Isolated from Mercury-Contaminated Soil

Ashish Pathak a,#, Rajneesh Jaswal a,#, Xiaoyu Xu b,c, Ashvini Chauhan a,✉
PMCID: PMC6013639  PMID: 29930048

ABSTRACT

We report here the draft genome sequence of Serratia sp. strain S1B, comprising 7,710,841 bases, 7,075 coding sequences, a G+C content of 45.9%, and 138 RNAs. Notably, a repertoire of biodegradative genes, several occurring on genomic islands, was also identified, which enhances our understanding of the environmental relevance of Serratia spp.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

The Savannah River Site (SRS), managed by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is a former nuclear facility, where metal-clad uranium (U) targets were fabricated for plutonium production (1, 2). Microorganisms isolated from SRS soils can serve as models to understand genomic mechanisms underpinning metal-microbe interactions and, in particular, bioremediation mechanisms from long-term contamination exposure. Toward this end, several bacterial strains were isolated from soils of the Savannah River Swamp System (sample ID SRSS-1) soils. The SRSS site is located at the confluence of Four Mile Creek and the Savannah River, which received liquid mercury (Hg) effluents from a chloralkali facility near Augusta, Georgia, USA, until the 1980s (3, 4). Cores were shipped on ice to the Florida A&M laboratory, where sediments were serially diluted and plated onto LB media containing Hg (5 µg/ml, provided as mercuric chloride) to isolate Hg-resistant bacteria. One robustly growing strain, labeled as strain S1B, was selected for genomic studies.

Briefly, DNA from strain S1B was extracted and sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument as described previously (5). Raw reads were de novo assembled with the SPAdes assembler (6) using default settings. Coverage statistics were computed by mapping raw reads to the assembled genome using Bowtie 2 (7); contigs with low coverage were removed. Genome island analysis was performed with Island Viewer (8), and taxonomic affiliation of strain B1 was assessed using the One Codex database.

Approximately 65.36% of the genomic reads from strain S1B were taxonomically affiliated with Serratia sp. DD3, but 16S rRNA gene PCR sequencing suggested closer affiliation with Serratia sp. S_T_TSA72. The genome sequence, with N50 and L50 values of 108,969 and 17 bp, respectively, was assembled in 153 contigs with a coverage of 300×. Annotation was performed with the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (9) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6253850), which revealed the genomic size of approximately 7,710,841 bases (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6253847.v2) with 7,075 coding sequences and a GC content of 45.9%. A total of 585 subsystems were annotated from strain S1B with genes (number in parentheses) for membrane transport (282), stress response (221), metabolism of aromatic compounds (173), motility and chemotaxis (9), among others. Several gene homologs, previously shown to be involved in the resistance against heavy metals/radionuclides, including the cobalt-zinc-cadmium efflux system, membrane transporters, and antimicrobial extrusion proteins, were also identified, which likely facilitates the survival of strain S1B in an Hg-contaminated habitat.

Notable evolutionary traits in strain S1B included the presence of several genomic islands (GEIs) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6253853), which provide genomic plasticity and beneficial features to the host (10). Specifically, relative to the genome of the metabolically versatile strain S. marcescens Db11, strain S1B contained a suite of interspersed genes coding for biodegradation and metal homeostasis. The latter aids cellular uptake, efflux, and sensory pathways maintaining low intracellular concentration of metals. Taken together, our findings show that the metal-resisitant Serratia sp. strain S1B harbors a variety of metal-resistant genes, many linked to GEIs. Such genome-enabled studies not only add to our understanding of metal-microbe interactions but will also potentially result in the identification of genomic markers to study bioremediation efficiency and restoration success of the historically contaminated SRS habitats.

Accession number(s).

This whole-genome shotgun project of strain S1B has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PYUJ00000000.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the DOE Minority Serving Institution Partnership Program (MSIPP) managed by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) under Savannah River Nuclear Solutions contract DE-AC09-08SR22470 (Task Order Agreements 0000272350 and 0000332983).

We acknowledge Stefan Green and Mark Maienschein-Cline, the University of Illinois at Chicago, and Meenakshi Agarwal, Bobby Edwards, and Jaden Hunt, Florida A&M University, for technical help. We also appreciate the continued technical oversight provided by John Dickson, Savannah River National Laboratory.

Footnotes

Citation Pathak A, Jaswal R, Xu X, Chauhan A. 2018. Draft genome sequence of Serratia sp. strain S1B, isolated from mercury-contaminated soil. Genome Announc 6:e00534-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00534-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Riley RG, Zachara J. 1992. Chemical contaminants on DOE lands and selection of contaminant mixtures for subsurface science research. Pacific Northwest Lab, Richland, WA. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Evans A, Bauer L, Haselow J, Hayes D, Martin H, McDowell W, Pickett J. 1992. Uranium in the Savannah River Site environment. Westinghouse Savannah River Co, Aiken, SC. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Killian TH, Colb NL, Corbo P, Marine IW. 1987. Environmental information document F-Area seepage basin. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Killian TH, Colb NL, Corbo P, Marine IW. 1987. Environmental information document H-Area seepage basin. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Savannah River Laboratory, Aiken, SC. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chauhan A, Pathak A, Jaswal R, Edwards B III, Chappell D, Ball C, Garcia-Sillas R, Stothard P, Seaman J. 2018. Physiological and comparative genomic analysis of Arthrobacter sp. SRS-W-1-2016 provides insights on niche adaptation for survival in uraniferous soils. Genes 9:31. doi: 10.3390/genes9010031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Simon Fraser University Research Computing Group , Lau BY, Hoad G, Winsor GL, Brinkman FSL. 2017. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W30–W35. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aziz R, Bartels D, Best A, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards R, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass E, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen G, Olson R, Osterman A, Overbeek R, McNeil L, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch G, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Juhas M, van der Meer JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW. 2009. Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33:376–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00136.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES