Abstract
Selectively interacting with ATP by synthetic molecules under physiological condition promises many useful applications but remains a challenge. Here we report that assemblies of nucleopeptides selectively sequestrate ATP in complex conditions (e.g., serum and cytosol). We develop assemblies of nucleopeptides that selectively sequester ATP over ADP. Counteracting enzymes interconvert ATP and ADP to modulate the nanostructures formed by the nucleopeptides and the nucleotides. The nucleopeptides, sequestering ATP effectively in cells, slow down efflux pumps in multidrug resistance cancer cells, thus boosting the efficacy of an anticancer drug. Examining additional 11 nucleopeptides (including D- and L-enantiomers) yields five more nucleopeptides that differentiate ATP and ADP via either precipitation or gelation. As the first example of using assemblies of nucleopeptides for interacting with ATP and disrupting intracellular ATP dynamics, this work illustrates the use of supramolecular assemblies to interact with small and essential biological molecules for controlling cell behaviors.
Keywords: self-assembly, nucleopeptide, enzyme switch, targeting metabolism, hydrogel
Graphical Abstract

Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), one of the most important biological anions, plays crucial roles in many cellular processes, including cellular respiration,[1] energy transduction,[2] enzyme catalysis,[3] and signaling.[4] Therefore, selective binding or sequestration of these polyphosphate species under biological conditions would help elucidate their roles in relevant physiological events and provide a powerful way to control cellular processes. Much efforts have focused on developing specific receptors, such as synthetic host-guest receptors,[5] RNA-aptamers,[6] bis-Zn based artificial receptors,[7] recombinant proteins and synthetic peptides,[8] for recognizing ATP. Among these strategies, protein engineering or peptide fragment mimetic is a direct approach for ATP recognition or sequestration.[8a, 8b] Although some of them exhibit high affinity toward ATP in water[8c, 9] or phosphate-free buffers (e.g., HEPES[7a, 10]), these molecules are largely ineffective for recognizing ATP in complex physiological conditions (i.e., PBS, human serum, and cell milieu). Therefore, the development of molecules for selectively sequestering ATP in complex medium is still limited, and their applications in cells remain unexplored. We have found that a nonapeptide formed a hydrogel instantly upon the addition of ATP.[11] This rather unexpected observation indicates that it is feasible to use assemblies of small molecules to interact with ATP. To increase the specificity towards ATP, we decided to explore the use of supramolecular assemblies of nucleopeptides for selectively sequestering ATP in complex physiological conditions.
Nucleopeptides, as the covalent conjugates of nucleobases and peptides,[12] exhibit excellent biocompatibility, good biostability, facile functionality, readily self-assemble in water, and promise useful biological and biomedical applications, including as antibiotics,[13] hydrogelators,[14] molecular recognition,[15] and promoters for cell uptake of nucleic acids,[16] and protease resistant peptide derivatives to accelerate the degradation of certain peptide nanofibrils.[17] Most importantly, bearing nucleobase(s), nucleopeptides would exhibit appreciable affinity to adenosine on ATP even under physiological condition due to the well-known Watson-Crick base pairs in the context of cells and in developing supramolecular materials.[18]
To explore the possibility of using nucleopeptides for selectively sequestering ATP, we introduced thymine to cap the N-terminal of a nonapeptide that instantly formed a hydrogel upon the addition of ATP.[11] Our study shows that the assemblies (rather than monomers) of a nucleopeptide (NP1) (Figure 1A) selectively sequester ATP over ADP in complex physiological conditions, evidenced by phase transition. Hexokinase (HK)[19] and creatine phosphokinase (CPK)[20] are able to control the cycle of ATP/ADP, thus modulating phase transition (from precipitate to solution and vice versa) and reversibly changing the morphologies of assemblies of NP1 and the nucleotides in PBS (Figure 1B). Most importantly, NP1 exhibits selectivity towards ATP under physiological conditions, including in serum and in cells. Being incubated with multiple drug resistance cancer cells, NP1 slows down the efflux of an anticancer drug (e.g., doxorubicin (Dox)), results in long cellular retention of Dox, thus boosting the anticancer activity of Dox against Dox-resistance cancer cells (Figure 1C). Examining 11 analogs of NP1 identifies five more nucleopeptides that differentiate ATP and ADP via either precipitation or gelation. As the first use of assemblies of small molecules for selectively sequestering ATP, this work opens up a new approach for rationally design supramolecular assemblies for sequestering (or recognizing) small biological molecules in complex physiological conditions to mimic the functions of proteins and to control cell behaviors.
Figure 1.

(A) Structure of a nucleopeptide (NP1) to sequester ATP selectively. (B) Illustration of assemblies of NP1 interaction with ATP or ADP and the reversible phase transition of the assemblies controlled by a pair of counteracting enzymes. (C) Plausible mechanism of assemblies of NP1 in a multidrug resistance cell to sequestrate ATP, thus slowing down drug efflux and boosting drug efficacy.
We designed nucleopeptide NP1 (Figure 1A) according to the following rationale: (i) a D-nonapeptide, ffkkfklkl, consists of ff for increasing self-assembly ability, kkfklkl for interacting with phosphate group[11] on ATP, and D-amino acids (f = D-phenylalanine, k = D-lysine, and l = D-leucine) for proteolytic resistance; (ii) thymine, capping the N-terminal of nonapeptide, ensures affinity to adenosine on ATP. After obtaining NP1 by solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS),[21] we first examined the ability of NP1 for differentiating ATP and ADP in PBS buffer. NP1 forms a clear solution, which becomes precipitates after the addition of ATP (Figure 2). But NP1 remains as a transparent solution in the presence of ADP. As revealed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), NP1 forms short nanofibers with length of 40±5 nm and width of 4±2 nm, which, in the presence of ATP, turn into uniform nanofibers with several hundred nanometers in length and 7±2 nm in width, which likely further aggregates to precipitate. ADP interacting with NP1 only results in short nanofibers with diameter of 5±2 nm, which remains soluble. Moreover, NP1 differentiates ATP and ADP in human serum (i.e., ATP interact with NP1 to form precipitates in serum, but NP1 remains soluble in serum upon the addition of ADP (Figure S1)), suggesting that the designed nucleopeptides should function under complex physiological conditions.
Figure 2.

TEM images of NP1 (0.4 wt%) in PBS buffer (pH7.4) (A) without or (B, C) with 1 equiv. of (B) ATP and (C) ADP. Insets: the corresponding optical images. Scale bar is 50 nm. CD spectra of NP1 at (D) 0.4 wt% and (E) 0.05 wt% with or without ATP or ADP (equal molar with NP1).
As revealed by the circular dichroism (CD) spectra and the analysis of the CD by DichroWeb,[22] NP1, at 0.4 wt%, presents predominantly in α-helical conformation (45%) with 28% of β-sheet and 19% of unordered structures (Figure 2D, Figure S2). Adding ATP slightly increases the α-helix conformation content of NP1 to 50%, and adding ADP slightly decreases the α-helix of NP1 to 40%. The red shift of two negative peaks of 200 nm and 223 nm in the presence of ATP (or ADP) agrees with that ATP or ADP enhances the assemblies of NP1. At 0.05 wt%, NP1 (Figure 2E) exhibits dominantly unordered structures (55%). The presence of ATP or ADP slightly reduces the portion of unordered structures, but significantly increases the percentage of α-helix from 0% to 9.5% or 15.0%, respectively. Static light scattering (SLS) of NP1 hardly changes until the concentration of NP1 is above 0.2 wt% (Figure S3), suggesting that NP1 starts assemble to form detectable nanofibers at the concentrations higher than 0.2 wt%. These results indicate that (i) the assemblies of NP1 interact stronger with ATP or ADP than the monomer of the NP1 does; (ii) ATP or ADP affects the secondary structure of NP1, thus resulting in different assemblies (Figure 1). Most importantly, these results confirm that NP1 interacts with ATP and ADP differently in PBS buffer.
To further examine the ability of NP1 to differentiate ATP and ADP in the presence of other biological molecules (e.g., metabolites and enzymes), we employed a pair of counteracting enzymes to interconvert ATP and ADP for controlling the self-assembly of NP1. The pair of enzymes are hexokinase (HK), which phosphorylates hexoses and generates ADP by transferring the phosphate group from ATP to glucose, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK), which catalyzes the generation of ATP from ADP in the presence of phosphocreatine (Pcr). With glucose, NP1 plus ATP remains as a precipitate, though TEM reveals more bundles of nanofibers with the fibril diameters of 8±2 nm (Figure 3A). Adding HK hydrolyzes ATP to ADP, which turns the precipitates into a clear solution and the long nanofibers into short (20–100 nm) and thin (4±2 nm) fibers (Figure 3B). With Pcr, NP1 plus ADP remains as a clear solution, containing short nanofibers of 3±2 nm in width (Figure 3C). The addition of CPK to the solution turns ADP into ATP and the solution into precipitates, which consist of long nanofibers with the diameters of 11±2 nm (Figure 3D). These results indicate that NP1 is able to sequester ATP when ATP forms via cellular metabolism.
Figure 3.

NP1 assemblies with ATP in the presence of glucose (A) without or (B) with addition of HK. NP1 assemblies with ADP in the presence of Pcr (C) without or (D) with the addition of CPK. Insets are the corresponding optical images. The concentration of NP1 is 0.4 wt%, equal molar ATP or ADP is added. All experiments are performed in 100 mM PBS buffer, pH7.4 for 24 h. Scale bar in (A) to (D) is 100 nm.
Expression of ATP-dependent efflux pumps in cancer cells plays a crucial role in multiple drug resistance (MDR).[23] Moreover, the concentration of ATP is usually several millimolar in human cells.[24] 31P NMR spectra indicated that NP1 can slow down the hydrolysis rate of ATP by ALP (Figure S5). Therefore, we tested the ability of NP1 for sequestering ATP in MDR cancer cells. After confirming that NP1 selectively sequester ATP in the buffer containing cellular major components (e.g., various proteins and glycans) (Figure S6), we treated MES-SA/dx5 cells with NP1 in the presence of Dox. Five hours after changing to the medium from with to without Dox, most of Dox remains inside the MES-SA/dx5 cells treated with NP1. But there is little Dox in the MES-SA/dx5 cells without NP1 treatment (Figures 4A and S7). These results suggest that the assemblies of NP1 likely sequester ATP inside cells, thus preventing the efflux of Dox by the efflux pump driven by ATP. Encouraged by these results, we further evaluated anti-proliferation efficiency of Dox in combination of NP1 against MES-SA/dx5 cells. Exhibiting little cytotoxicity by itself, NP1, significantly increases the cytotoxicity of Dox against MES-SA/dx5 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figures 4B, S8 and S9). Specifically, the addition of NP1 at the concentration of 500 μM (or 200 μM) increases the cell death caused by Dox from 46% to 92% (or 67%) (Figures 4B and S8). Moreover, NP1 exhibits dose-dependent effect in enhancing the anticancer efficiency of Dox, agreeing with that the assemblies of NP1 sequester ATP in vitro (Figure S3).
Figure 4.

(A) CLSM images show the inhibition of Dox efflux by NP1 in MES-SA/dx5 cells at 0 h (changing to fresh medium without Dox after washing 3 times) and 5 h (further incubation after changing medium). Scale bar is 20 μm. (B) MES-SA/dx5 cell viability that treated with Dox or the mixture of NP1 and Dox (5 μM) for 48 h (n=3, ***: p < 0.001).
We also used TEM to image live cells incubated without or with NP1. The cells incubated with NP1 exhibits nanofibrous structures having diameters of 7±2 nm, which are similar with the TEM image of the cell free experiment (Figures 5A and S10). Then, we measured the cellular ATP levels in Dox untreated or treated conditions in the presence of NP1. The cells maintain ATP levels after the treatment of NP1 within 5 h, while the control cells increase the ATP levels (Figure 5B). Because NP1 exhibit little cytotoxicity, this result suggests that NP1 affects the metabolic processes of ATP. To further demonstrate the interaction between NP1 and ATP inside cells, we synthesized NBD labelled NP1 (NP1-NBD) as a structural analog of NP1, which retained ability for sequestering ATP (Figure S11). CLSM images (Figures 5C and S12) indicate that almost all ATP overlapped with NP1-NBD, and the fluorescence of ATP hardly changes with time (Figure S13). These results together further confirm the designed nucleopeptide selectively sequesters ATP to boost anticancer drug activity in MDR cells.
Figure 5.

(A) TEM images of cell components collected from live cells without (control) or with the incubation of NP1 for 5h. Scale bar is 100 nm. (B) ATP concentrations in the live cells incubated with NP1 (500 μM), NP1 plus Dox (10 μM), Dox (10 μM), and culture medium (n = 3, the asterisks indicate the difference between 1 h with 3 or 5 h. ns: non-significant, *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01). (C) CLSM images of MES-SA/dx5 cells incubated with Alexa-ATP and NP1-NBD (50 μM). Scale bar is 5 μm.
To correlate the structures of nucleopeptides with the ability of sequestering ATP, we synthesized 11 analogues of NP1 and tested their phase transition in the presence of ATP or ADP (Scheme S2 and S3, Table S2). NP2, as an L-enantiomer of NP1, which becomes precipitates after the addition of ATP, but remains as a transparent solution in the presence of ADP (Figure S14). TEM reveals that the amorphous nanostructures formed by NP2, transform into spherical like structures after addition of ATP with width of 29 ±2 nm, which further interact with each other to form 3D network (Figure S14) and precipitate from the solution. On the contrary, ADP interacts with NP2 to results in nanofibrous structure with width of 10±2 nm. Different morphologies of the nanostructures resulted from the solutions of NP1 and NP2 likely originate from their chiralities, which minimally affect their ability to differentiate ATP and ADP, evidenced by macroscopic phase transition during ATP/ADP cycle (Figure S17). Systematically shortening the lengths of NP1 or NP2 results in four more nucleopeptides (NP3 to NP6, Schemes S2 and S3) that differentiate ATP and ADP via either precipitation or gelation (Figures S19 to S21). These results indicate that the efficacy of the assemblies of nucleopeptides for sequestering ATP depends more on the length than on the chirality and more on self-assembling ability than on the number of charges of the nucleopeptides.
In conclusion, illustrating the use of assemblies of nucleopeptides for selectively sequestering ATP in complex conditions, this work provides a novel approach to modulate the functions of ATP in cells, agreeing with the notion that locally increasing the concentration of small molecules[25] would be a powerful strategy for modulating biological processes. In essence, the use of the interconversion of ATP to ADP to control the dynamics and filaments of NP1 mimics the actin filament formation, in which ATP activates G-actin polymerization and hydrolysis of ATP to ADP destabilizes the actin filament.[26] Thus, the reversible morphology transition of nucleopeptide during ATP/ADP cycle, which controlled by counteracting enzymes, may act as a starting point for mimicking self-assembly/disassembly process of actin. These findings not only provide an alternative strategy for potentially targeting metabolism of cancer cells by assemblies of small molecules,[6c] but also extend the supramolecular assemblies, which are bountiful from the development of gelators,[27] as an effective entities for recognizing cellular bioactive molecules.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by NIH (CA142746), NSF (DMR-1420382) and W. M. Keck Foundation. ZF thanks the Dean’s fellowship.
References
- 1.Warburg O. Science. 1956;123:309–314. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lipmann F. Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1941;1:99–162. doi: 10.1002/9780470122808.ch1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeLange RJ, Kemp RG, Riley WD, Cooper RA, Krebs EG. J Biol Chem. 1968;243:2200–2208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.a) Leist M, Single B, Castoldi AF, Kühnle S, Nicotera P. J Exp Med. 1997;185:1481–1486. doi: 10.1084/jem.185.8.1481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bours M, Swennen E, Di Virgilio F, Cronstein B, Dagnelie P. Pharmacol Ther. 2006;112:358–404. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.a) Yan Q, Zhao Y. Chem Sci. 2015;6:4343–4349. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00965k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yu G, Zhou J, Shen J, Tang G, Huang F. Chem Sci. 2016;7:4073–4078. doi: 10.1039/c6sc00531d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Mo R, Jiang T, DiSanto R, Tai W, Gu Z. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3364. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Tobey SL, Jones BD, Anslyn EV. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:4026–4027. doi: 10.1021/ja021390n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Busschaert N, Caltagirone C, Van Rossom W, Gale PA. Chem Rev. 2015;115:8038–8155. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Huizenga DE, Szostak JW. Biochemistry. 1995;34:656–665. doi: 10.1021/bi00002a033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Dieckmann T, Suzuki E, Nakamura GK, Feigon J. Rna. 1996;2:628–640. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Mo R, Jiang T, Gu Z. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2014;126:5925–5930. [Google Scholar]
- 7.a) Dhiman S, Jain A, George SJ. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2017;129:1349–1353. [Google Scholar]; b) Ojida A, Nonaka H, Miyahara Y, Tamaru Si, Sada K, Hamachi I. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;118:5644–5647. doi: 10.1002/anie.200601315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.a) Korch SB, Stomel JM, León MA, Hamada MA, Stevenson CR, Simpson BW, Gujulla SK, Chaput JC. ACS Chem Biol. 2012;8:451–463. doi: 10.1021/cb3004786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ishii D, Kinbara K, Ishida Y, Ishii N. Nature. 2003;423:628. doi: 10.1038/nature01663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Butterfield SM, Waters ML. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:9580–9581. doi: 10.1021/ja0359254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.a) Rhee HW, Choi HY, Han K, Hong JI. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:4524–4525. doi: 10.1021/ja070026r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Li C, Numata M, Takeuchi M, Shinkai S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2005;44:6371–6374. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lee DH, Kim SY, Hong JI. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2004;43:4777–4780. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.a) Kurishita Y, Kohira T, Ojida A, Hamachi I. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:13290–13299. doi: 10.1021/ja103615z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ojida A, Park S-k, Mito-oka Y, Hamachi I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002;43:6193–6195. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang H, Feng Z, Lu A, Jiang Y, Wu H, Xu B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2017 doi: 10.1002/anie.201702783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.a) Lohse P, Oberhauser B, Oberhauser-Hofbauer B, Baschang G, Eschenmoser A. Croat Chem Acta. 1996;69:535–562. [Google Scholar]; b) Egholm M, Buchardt O, Nielsen PE, Berg RH. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114:1895–1897. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roviello GN, Benedetti E, Pedone C, Bucci EM. Amino Acids. 2010;39:45–57. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0567-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.a) Li X, Kuang Y, Lin HC, Gao Y, Shi J, Xu B. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:9365–9369. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Peters GM, Davis JT. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:3188–3206. doi: 10.1039/c6cs00183a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Berger O, Adler-Abramovich L, Levy-Sakin M, Grunwald A, Liebes-Peer Y, Bachar M, Buzhansky L, Mossou E, Forsyth VT, Schwartz T. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015;10:353–360. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2015.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Serpell CJ, Barłóg M, Basu K, Fakhoury JF, Bazzi HS, Sleiman HF. Mater Horiz. 2014;1:348–354. [Google Scholar]; e) Liu P, Ni R, Mehta AK, Childers WS, Lakdawala A, Pingali SV, Thiyagarajan P, Lynn DG. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:16867–16869. doi: 10.1021/ja807425h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.a) Diederichsen U. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1996;35:445–448. [Google Scholar]; b) Vernille JP, Kovell LC, Schneider JW. Bioconjugate Chem. 2004;15:1314–1321. doi: 10.1021/bc049831a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Ura Y, Beierle JM, Leman LJ, Orgel LE, Ghadiri MR. Science. 2009;325:73–77. doi: 10.1126/science.1174577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.a) Li X, Kuang Y, Shi J, Gao Y, Lin HC, Xu B. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:17513–17518. doi: 10.1021/ja208456k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Leonidova A, Foerster C, Zarschler K, Schubert M, Pietzsch HJ, Steinbach J, Bergmann R, Metzler-Nolte N, Stephan H, Gasser G. Chem Sci. 2015;6:5601–5616. doi: 10.1039/c5sc00951k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yuan D, Shi J, Du X, Zhou N, Xu B. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137:10092–10095. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.a) Peters GM, Skala LP, Davis JT. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;138:134–139. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b08769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Kato T, Mizoshita N, Kishimoto K. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2006;45:38–68. doi: 10.1002/anie.200501384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Kato T. Science. 2002;295:2414–2418. doi: 10.1126/science.1070967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kato T, Kihara H, Kumar U, Uryu T, Fréchet JM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1994;33:1644–1645. [Google Scholar]; e) Lehn JM. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36:151–160. doi: 10.1039/b616752g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Ariga K, Kunitake T. Acc Chem Res. 1998;31:371–378. [Google Scholar]; g) Egholm M, Buchardt O, Christensen L, Behrens C, Freier SM, Driver DA, Berg RH, Kim SK, Norden B, Nielsen PE. Nature. 1993;365:566–568. doi: 10.1038/365566a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Crane RK, Sols A. J Biol Chem. 1953;203:273–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Okinaka S, Kumagai H, Ebashi S, Sugita H, Momoi H, Toyokura Y, Fujie Y. Archives of neurology. 1961;4:520–525. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1961.00450110050006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fields GB, Noble RL. Chem Biol Drug Des. 1990;35:161–214. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Whitmore L, Wallace B. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:W668–W673. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:48. doi: 10.1038/nrc706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gorman MW, Feigl EO, Buffington CW. Clin Chem. 2007;53:318–325. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2006.076364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.a) Tiller JC. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2003;42:3072–3075. doi: 10.1002/anie.200301647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bieser AM, Tiller JC. Chem Commun. 2005:3942–3944. doi: 10.1039/b506160a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.a) Pollard TD, Borisy GG. Cell. 2003;112:453–465. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ, Furman MI, Wachsstock D, Safer D, Nachmias VT, Pollard TD. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:1015–1024. doi: 10.1091/mbc.3.9.1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.a) Mallia VA, Butler PD, Sarkar B, Holman KT, Weiss RG. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:15045–15054. doi: 10.1021/ja204371b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Weiss RG. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:7519–7530. doi: 10.1021/ja503363v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sun Z, Li Z, He Y, Shen R, Deng L, Yang M, Liang Y, Zhang Y. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:13379–13386. doi: 10.1021/ja403345p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Tamaru Si, Takeuchi M, Sano M, Shinkai S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2002;41:853–856. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020301)41:5<853::aid-anie853>3.0.co;2-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Mukhopadhyay P, Fujita N, Takada A, Kishida T, Shirakawa M, Shinkai S. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2010;49:6338–6342. doi: 10.1002/anie.201001382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Mytnyk S, Olive AG, Versluis F, Poolman JM, Mendes E, Eelkema R, van Esch JH. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2017;56:14923–14927. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
