Abstract
Purpose
We aimed to investigate the relationship between prior fracture and risk of incident ischaemic cardiovascular events in a UK population-based cohort.
Methods
UK Biobank is a large prospective cohort comprising 502,637 men and women aged 40-69 years, with detailed baseline assessment. History of fracture was self-reported, and details of hospital admissions for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (ICD-10:I20-I25) were obtained through linkage to UK Hospital Episode Statistics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate the prospective relationships between prior fracture and hospital admission for men and women, controlling for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, educational level, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, calcium and vitamin D use, ankle spacing-width, heel BUA, and HRT use(women).
Results
Amongst men a fragility fracture (hip, spine, wrist, or arm fracture resulting from a simple fall) within the previous five years was associated with a 35% increased risk of IHD admission (fully-adjusted HR:1.35;95%CI: 1.00,1.82; p=0.047), with the relationship predominantly driven by wrist fractures. Associations with hospitalisation for angina in men were similar in age-adjusted models [HR:1.54;95%CI: 1.03,2.30), p=0.037], but did not remain statistical significant after full adjustment [HR:1.64;95%CI: 0.88,3.07); p=0.121]. HRs for admission with angina were lower in women, and neither age- nor fully-adjusted relationships attained statistical significance.
Conclusions
Prior fragility fracture is an independent risk factor for incident ischaemic cardiovascular events in men. Further work may clarify whether this association is causal or represents shared risk factors, but these findings are likely to be of value in risk assessment of both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.
Keywords: osteoporosis, epidemiology, fragility fractures, cardiovascular, heart
Introduction
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), together with cancer, is the leading cause of death in the developed world, and as with osteoporosis, it becomes more common with increasing age [1, 2]. Studies have suggested links between osteoporosis and CVD, and low bone mineral density has been associated with increased aortic calcification [3–5], risk of cardiovascular events and premature death [3]. Several studies have shown that CVD and vascular calcification are associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and greater risk of fractures [6, 7]. Indeed, a diagnosis of CVD; whether ischaemic heart disease, heart failure, stroke or peripheral arterial disease, has been shown to be related to the subsequent risk of osteoporotic fracture (mostly of the hip), although the exact mechanism remains unclear [8–11]. Several studies have documented associations between chronic inflammation, osteoporosis [12,13] and cardiovascular disease [14], together with other conditions such as sarcopenia [15], diabetes/obesity [16] and dementia [17], suggesting one possible common mechanism. However, there is also evidence that risk factors for fracture and ischaemic heart disease overlap considerably [18, 19]. Here, we investigated the relationship between prior fracture and risk of incident cardiovascular events in both men and women, hypothesizing that participants with prior fragility fracture would have a higher risk of incident cardiovascular events than those without.
Methods
Study population
UK Biobank is a large prospective cohort with detailed baseline assessment. Between 2006 and 2010, more than 500,000 participants aged 40 to 69 were recruited nationwide. Data regarding lifestyle, environment, medical history, physical measures, and biological samples, were collected, and consent obtained for follow-up [20–22].
Demographic and clinical assessment
Participants completed a series of computer-based questionnaires followed by face-to-face interviews with trained research staff. Details of the assessments and variables are publicly available (http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/crystal/), and a transcript of the questionnaire may be downloaded (http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Touch_screen_questionnaire.pdf?phpMyAdmin=trmKQlYdjjnQIgJ%2CfAzikMhEnx6). Information collected included socio-demographics (gender, age, ethnicity, and educational attainment), lifestyle factors (including smoking status, alcohol consumption and physical activity) and self-reported physician-diagnosed comorbidities (e.g. hypertension, diabetes and cancer). Details regarding calcium and vitamin D use and hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) in women were also obtained. The questionnaire asked participants to report any doctor's diagnosis of cardiovascular comorbidities such as coronary artery disease (combining angina and heart attack), stroke, and diabetes, and for all regular medications to be listed. Weight and height measurements were obtained for calculation of BMI (kg/m2); systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP, DBP) were measured using the Omron HEM-7015IT digital blood pressure monitor. History of fracture was self-reported. All participants were asked if they had fractured or broken a bone in the past five years and if yes, at which of the following specific sites: ankle, leg, hip, spine, wrist, arm or other bones. A further question asked if the fracture resulted from a simple fall (low-trauma fracture). Combining this information, ‘fragility fracture’ was defined as a low-trauma (occurring as a result of a fall) fracture involving the hip, spine, wrist or arm. ‘Other’ and ‘unknown’ fractures were excluded from subsequent analyses. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) (db/MHz) and speed of sound (SOS) (m/s) were measured at least twice on each calcaneum with a SAHARA sonometer (Hologic, Marlborough, USA) and left and right mean values used for analysis. Intermalleolar distance (“ankle spacing width”) was also recorded, as soft tissue thickness may influence heel ultrasound indices. Measures of BUA were available for 485,899 of the 502,664 participants who attended the health examination and completed the health and lifestyle questionnaire.
Ascertainment of outcomes
Information on incident hospital admission for ischaemic heart disease (IHD: I20-I25) and for acute myocardial infarction (I21) or angina (I20, which includes both unstable and stable angina) was obtained through linkage to UK Hospital Episode Statistics (HES). The remaining ICD10 codes included: subsequent myocardial infarction within 4 weeks after a first event; complications of myocardial infarction; other acute ischaemic heart disease, and chronic ischaemic heart disease. HES data are produced through coding and central reporting of diagnoses underlying hospital admissions nationwide. All study subjects were followed up until any ischaemic cardiovascular event, death, or until 29th February 2016, yielding a mean follow-up time of 7 years and a maximum time of 10 years.
Statistical analyses
Baseline characteristics were analysed in men and women separately, reporting mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and number (percent) for categorical variables, and testing for differences between the cohort with and without a previous fragility fracture.
We explored associations between previous fracture/fragility fracture and (i) hospital admission for ischaemic heart disease, (ii) hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction or iii) hospital admission for angina, using Cox proportional hazards models, with results expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI). In further analyses, we explored the associations between previous fragility fracture and hospital admission for either ischaemic heart disease, myocardial infarction or angina using competing-risk regression models, with death from any cause as competing risk event. We used a similar approach to investigate associations between previous fragility fracture and risk of death due to ischaemic heart disease, accounting for risk of death from any other cause. Competing-hazard models generate sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) instead of hazard ratios and treat death from any cause as competing risk as participants who experience this event cannot have a subsequent outcome, unlike those who are lost at follow-up (censored). The interpretation of SHR is similar to the HR of a Cox regression, with estimates higher than 1 indicating an increased risk of the outcome controlling for the fact that the competing risk events can also occur. Results from both approaches are reported firstly adjusted for age, and then adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, educational level, physical activity, SBP, medications for cholesterol/diabetes, calcium and vitamin D use, ankle spacing width, heel BUA and HRT (women). All analyses were performed separately for men and women and were performed using Stata v 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).
Results
Characteristics of the participants
Of the 502,637 participants recruited to UK Biobank, 482,672 individuals (median age 58 years, 54.6% women) had complete data on fracture in the previous five years and BUA. We excluded people who either had hospital admission records (HES) for the studied cardiovascular diseases (ICD10 codes I20-I25) before completing the baseline questionnaire, or, when recruited, reported to have been previously diagnosed by a doctor with myocardial infarction or any form of angina. This left a dataset of 456,694 participants (55.9% women). A total of 43,008 participants (9.4%) reported a previous fracture in the past five years: 25,702 (10.1%) in women and 17,306 (8.6%) in men. Fragility fracture was recorded in 10,018 participants; 7,684 in women and 2,334 in men. Table 1 summarises the baseline characteristics including the number of prior hip (n=765), spine (n=980), arm (n=4,578) and wrist (n=8,800) fractures.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the participants, by fragility fracture status and sex
Women | Men | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristics | Without fragility fracture | With fragility fracture | p-value+ | Without fragility fracture | With fragility fracture | p-value+ |
(N=247768) | (n=7684) | (N=198908) | (n=2334) | |||
Demographic characteristics | ||||||
Age [median(IQR)], years | 57.0 (50.0,63.0) | 61.0 (56.0,65.0) | <0.001 | 58.0 (50.0,63.0) | 58.0 (49.0,63.0) | 0.07 |
BMI [mean(SD)], kg/m2 | 26.0 (23.4,29.6) | 26.2 (23.6,29.6) | 0.02 | 27.2 (24.9,29.9) | 27.3 (24.8,30.2) | 0.12 |
Ethnicity (%) | ||||||
White | 94.5 | 97.4 | <0.001 | 94.4 | 94.7 | 0.57 |
Qualification (%) | ||||||
College or University degree | 38.3 | 37.1 | <0.001 | 42.1 | 41.5 | 0.89 |
A levels/AS levels | 14.5 | 13.5 | 12.6 | 12.0 | ||
O levels/GCSEs | 28.4 | 30.2 | 22.5 | 23.1 | ||
CSEs or equivalent | 6.6 | 5.0 | 6.7 | 6.8 | ||
NVQ or HND or HNC | 5.3 | 5.7 | 10.8 | 11.4 | ||
Other professional qualification | 6.9 | 8.5 | 5.3 | 5.1 | ||
Lifestyle factors | ||||||
Alcohol consumption (%) | ||||||
at least 3 times per week | 37.2 | 37.6 | 0.48 | 52.1 | 52.4 | 0.81 |
Smoking (%) | ||||||
Never | 59.9 | 57.0 | <0.001 | 50.3 | 47.4 | <0.001 |
Ex | 31.0 | 33.3 | 37.1 | 35.1 | ||
Current | 8.8 | 9.2 | 12.3 | 16.8 | ||
Not known | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | ||
Taking medication for cholesterol/diabetes [n (%)] | 26656 (10.8) | 1098 (14.3) | <0.001 | 34663 (17.4) | 472 (20.2) | <0.001 |
Physical activity [median (IQR)], days a week | 1.0 (0,3.0) | 1.0 (0,3.0) | 0.04 | 2.0 (0,3.0) | 2.0 (0,4.0) | 0.56 |
Systolic blood pressure [mean(SD)], mmHg | 135.1 (19.2) | 138.2 (19.3) | <0.001 | 141.1 (17.4) | 141.0 (17.8) | 0.63 |
Fracture site (n) | ||||||
Hip | 439 | 326 | ||||
Spine | 581 | 399 | ||||
Wrist | 6281 | 2519 | ||||
Arm | 2909 | 1669 | ||||
t test used in case of normality, Mann-Whitney U test used in case of non-normality of the distribution, chi 2 test used for categorical variables
Women with fragility fractures were older than those without (p<0.001). For both men and women, the proportion of current smokers was higher in the group with a previous fragility fracture. The use of medication for cholesterol or diabetes was significantly higher among those with a previous fragility fracture. Online Supplementary Tables 1 and 2 summarise the characteristics of the participants by sex, stratified by the reporting of prior hip or spine fracture.
Prior fracture and hospitalisation for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) events
In total, 3238 women and 6768 men suffered from an incident IHD event during the follow-up period, while 888 women and 2349 men were admitted to hospital with an acute myocardial infarction and 1045 women and 1338 men with angina. Table 2a and Figure 1 show the relationships between prior fracture, fragility fractures, and incident ischaemic cardiac outcomes.
Table 2a.
Prior fracture in the past 5 years and the risk of incident hospital admission with ischaemic heart disease, acute myocardial infarction or angina in men and women.
Women | Men | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hospitalisation with ischaemic heart disease | HR (95% CI) | p | HR (95% CI) | p |
N | 3,238 | 6,768 | ||
Any fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.16 (1.04,1.28) | 0.005 | 1.11 (1.02,1.21) | 0.015 |
Fully adjusted | 1.13 (0.95,1.34) | 0.179 | 1.11 (0.97,1.26) | 0.121 |
Fragility fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.04 (0.87,1.24) | 0.692 | 1.18 (0.96,1.45) | 0.113 |
Fully adjusted | 1.06 (0.78,1.43) | 0.712 | 1.35 (1.00,1.82) | 0.047 |
Hospitalisation with acute myocardial infarction | ||||
N | 888 | 2349 | ||
Any fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.19 (0.98,1.45) | 0.083 | 1.07 (0.92,1.24) | 0.389 |
Fully adjusted | 1.25 (0.92,1.70) | 0.149 | 0.97 (0.78,1.22) | 0.823 |
Fragility fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.07 (0.76,1.49) | 0.706 | 1.01 (0.70,1.47) | 0.944 |
Fully adjusted | 1.20 (0.70,2.05) | 0.508 | 1.09 (0.63,1.89) | 0.748 |
Hospitalisation with angina | ||||
N | 1,045 | 1,338 | ||
Any fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.31 (1.10,1.56) | 0.003 | 1.23 (1.02,1.47) | 0.029 |
Fully adjusted | 1.31 (0.99,1.74) | 0.057 | 1.21 (0.91,1.62) | 0.185 |
Fragility fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.26 (0.95,1.68) | 0.112 | 1.54 (1.03,2.30) | 0.037 |
Fully adjusted | 1.39 (0.88,2.22) | 0.16 | 1.64 (0.88,3.07) | 0.121 |
Fully adjusted models are adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, educational level, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, calcium and vitamin D use, HRT (women) and additionally for heel BUA and ankle spacing width. HR: Hazard ratio.
Figure 1.
Risk of first hospital admission for ischaemic heart disease associated with history of any fracture or osteoporotic fracture in the 5 years prior to the baseline assessment. Data are hazard ratio and 95%CI, adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, educational level, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, calcium and vitamin D use, heel BUA, ankle spacing width, and HRT (women).
Thus for both men and women there were modest associations between prior fracture (irrespective of trauma involved) and incident IHD admission, but these did not remain statistically significant in fully-adjusted models. Among men, a fragility fracture within the previous five years was associated with 35% increased risk of admission for IHD (fully adjusted HR: 1.35; 95%CI: 1.00, 1.82; p=0.047). Associations with hospitalisation for angina in men followed a similar pattern the age-adjusted models, with a 54% increase in risk with prior fragility fracture [HR: 1.54; 95%CI: 1.03, 2.30), p=0.037], but did not remain statistical significant after full adjustment [HR: 1.64; 95%CI: 0.88, 3.07); p=0.121]. The hazard ratios for angina were a little lower in women, but neither the age-adjusted nor fully adjusted relationships were statistically significant. With acute myocardial infarction as the outcome neither the age-adjusted nor fully adjusted models yielded any significant associations with prior fragility fracture in men or women. Table 3 demonstrates that accounting for mortality as a competing risk did not materially alter the associations for any outcome.
Table 3.
Prior fracture in the past 5 years and the risk of incident hospital admission with ischaemic heart disease in men and women, adjusting for the competing hazard of death from any cause.
Women | Men | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hospitalisation with ischaemic heart disease | SHR (95% CI) | p | SHR (95% CI) | p |
N | 3,238 | 6,768 | ||
Fragility fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.04 (0.87,1.24) | 0.674 | 1.18 (0.96,1.45) | 0.110 |
Fully adjusted | 1.06 (0.78,1.44) | 0.694 | 1.35 (1.01,1.82) | 0.046 |
Fully adjusted models are adjusted for age, BMI, smoking, alcohol, educational level, physical activity, systolic blood pressure, calcium and vitamin D use, HRT (women) and additionally for heel BUA and ankle spacing width. HR: Hazard ratio; SHR: Sub-distribution hazard ratio.
Site specific associations between prior fracture and incident IHD admission
The number of wrist fractures was greater than that of arm fractures and far greater than that of hip or spine fractures; whilst there were no statistically significant associations between prior fracture of the hip, spine or arm and incident IHD admission, there was a strongly statistically significant relationship between fracture of the wrist and incident IHD admission amongst men (Table 2b): (55% increased risk); fully adjusted HR 1.55 (95%CI: 1.17, 2.04), p=0.002. Amongst women, there was a relationship of similar magnitude, albeit less statistically robust, for prior arm fracture, which was associated with a 46% increased risk of IHD admission: fully adjusted HR: 1.46 (95%CI: 0.95, 2.22), p=0.081.
Table 2b.
Prior hip, spine, wrist or arm fracture in the past 5 years and the risk of incident hospital admission with ischaemic heart disease, acute myocardial infarction or angina in men and women.
Women | Men | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Hospitalisation with ischaemic heart disease | HR (95% CI) | p | HR (95% CI) | p |
Hip fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 0.80 (0.36,1.79) | 0.590 | 0.69 (0.35,1.38) | 0.300 |
Fully adjusted | 1.11 (0.36,3.45) | 0.858 | - | |
Spine fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 0.81 (0.38,1.70) | 0.573 | 1.31 (0.81,2.10) | 0.27 |
Fully adjusted | 0.66 (0.16,2.64) | 0.555 | 0.90 (0.37,2.16) | 0.807 |
Wrist fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.03 (0.84,1.25) | 0.8 | 1.36 (1.12,1.65) | 0.002 |
Fully adjusted | 0.96 (0.68,1.37) | 0.841 | 1.55 (1.17,2.04) | 0.002 |
Arm fracture | ||||
Adjusted for age | 1.14 (0.86,1.51) | 0.366 | 1.03 (0.79,1.35) | 0.837 |
Fully adjusted | 1.46 (0.95,2.22) | 0.081 | 0.92 (0.59,1.43) | 0.715 |
Prior fragility fracture and risk of death following admission for ischaemic heart disease
In total, IHD accounted for 492 deaths in men and 120 deaths in women. In a model accounting for the competing hazard of death from other causes, there was no evidence of an association between prior fragility fractures in the previous five years and risk of death following admission for ischaemic heart disease in either sex. Fully adjusted HR women: 0.59 (95%CI: 0.08,4.56), p=0.62; and for men: 1.66 (0.61,4.54), p=0.32.
Discussion
We have demonstrated, in the very large population-based UK Biobank cohort, that a history of prior fragility fracture (occurring at hip, spine, wrist or arm as the result of a simple fall) predicts incident ischaemic cardiovascular events in men, independently of a wide range of covariates, and that this relationship appeared to be driven primarily by prior wrist fractures. In this relatively young cohort, adjustment for the competing hazard of death did not materially alter the risk estimates, and indeed we did not observe any relationships between prior fragility fracture and ischaemic cardiac mortality in either sex.
There are few studies examining links between prior fracture and incident ischaemic heart disease, and we are not aware of specific data relating to wrist fracture in this context. Thus in a large case-control study of 8,758 Taiwanese hip fracture patients (mean age 70 years), hip fracture was independently associated with a greater risk of acute myocardial infarction (HR = 1.29; 95%CI: 1.12, 1.48; p<0.001) [23]. In the placebo group of the MORE trial of raloxifene [19], increased incidence of cardiovascular events was reported in post-menopausal women (mean age 66.5 years) with prior vertebral fractures. One recent study reported that amongst 2,101 patients hospitalised with a hip fracture (mean age 63.9 years), there was a 53% increased risk of stroke (adjusted HR: 1.53; 95%CI: 1.17, 2.01; p=0.002) compared with 6,303 randomly selected controls matched on sex, age and year of index healthcare use over a one-year follow-up period [24]. Conversely, several studies have shown cross-sectional associations between low bone mineral density and vascular calcification, for example at the aorta. The diagnosis of various manifestations of cardiovascular or cerebral vascular disease, such as coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke, dementia [25,26] have all been associated with increased incident fracture risk, a direction of associations which is perhaps intuitively easier to understand given the potential effect of these conditions on mobility. It should be noted that the age distribution of participants in these studies is generally somewhat greater than in our cohort which is likely to have limited our ability to ascertain associations across both sexes and specific cardiac or fracture diagnostic categories. The younger age of our cohort is consistent with the predominance of wrist fractures over those of the hip and spine. (The reporting of spine fractures will also reflect that only a minority of these come to clinical attention) [1]. Our observation of relationships between prior wrist fracture, but not other sites, and incident IHD in men may thus partly reflect lower power to detect associations with hip or spine fractures in the context of an underlying association between bone fragility and ischaemic cardiac disease. The stronger association for fractures occurring as a result of a fall compared with all fractures irrespective of the magnitude of trauma involved (albeit independent of heel BUA as a surrogate measure of bone strength) would support this. Conversely, there may be contributions from factors unrelated to bone fragility which increase specifically risk of both wrist fracture and IHD: whilst we adjusted comprehensively for such potential effects, this specificity of association, and elucidation of underlying mechanisms will require further investigation.
Whilst the available literature is consistent with our findings of links between bone fragility and cardiovascular disease, it should be noted that both conditions are common in elderly individuals and have previously been regarded as independent age-related disorders [1, 2]. As such both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease share some common risk factors such as lack of physical activity, smoking, alcohol use, glucocorticoids, diabetes [27,28]. It is therefore possible that the observed associations simply reflect the presence of such common risk factors. However, some studies have suggested overlap in the etiological mechanisms of these diseases [18, 19]. For example, bone metabolism and vascular physiology share several regulatory factors, and the process of vascular calcification in many ways resembles that of bone formation [29,30]. Although the pathophysiology of this observed association of fragility fracture and future development of CVD remains poorly understood, progress continues to be made investigating the potential roles of both chronic inflammation and oxidative stress. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein and inflammatory cytokines have been shown to be associated with CVD, fracture risk [31] and poorer trabecular microarchitecture in men [32]. Secondly, oxidative stress is associated with severe atherosclerosis and low bone stiffness [33]. Further work will be required to elucidate the extent to which such mechanisms explain observations such as those presented here.
The existing data linking prior fracture to incident cardiovascular events have focused mainly on women, and we could not identify any other studies in which sex differences in these relationships have been documented. The much lower incidence of cardiovascular events amongst women than men may have limited our ability to detect associations amongst female participants. However, our findings are consistent with recent epidemiological data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, which demonstrate that the excess mortality following a fracture is greater in men than women compared to mortality rates in the general population [34,35].
We studied a very large population-based cohort assessed in detail and with uniform methodology, with outcome events linked through hospital records. However there are some limitations that should be considered in the interpretation of our results. Firstly, prior fracture was ascertained by self-report. However, UK Biobank is not predicated on any individual disease so there is no reason why individuals might preferentially report such events. Secondly, we relied on hospital event linkage for outcome data and therefore may not have captured out-patient events, or general practice consultations for conditions such as angina pectoris. Furthermore we were not able to validate diagnoses using clinical data such as ECGs and troponin levels. However, hospital admission for ischaemic cardiac diagnoses is likely to yield a more reliable outcome than its antecedents, and direct clinical validation in a study of this scale is not feasible. Thirdly, we cannot exclude the possibility of selection bias towards a healthy population, as is common with such studies, and which is likely to have reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events. The relatively low mortality rate is consistent with the minimal effect of accounting for mortality in competing hazard models. Finally, this was a relatively young cohort in terms of fractures, although not for ischaemic heart disease. It is therefore not clear how generalizable our findings are to older, frailer populations.
In conclusion, this study supports prior fragility fracture, particularly of the wrist, as an independent risk factor for incident cardiovascular events in men. Further work is required to elucidate whether this association is causal or represents shared risk factors. Nonetheless, these findings are likely to be of value in risk assessment of both osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease.
Supplementary Material
Mini Abstract.
In the large UK Biobank population-based cohort, we found that amongst men, but not women, prior fragility fracture was associated with increased risk of admission with ischaemic heart disease.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council, British Heart Foundation, Arthritis Research UK, National Osteoporosis Society, International Osteoporosis Foundation, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Barts. EMC is supported by the Wellcome Trust and NIHR. We thank Mrs G Strange and Mrs R Fifield for helping prepare the manuscript. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (access reference 3593).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest:
J Paccou, S D’Angelo, E Curtis, A Rhodes, Z Raisi-Estabragh, K Walker-Bone, M Edwards, C Cooper, S Petersen and N Harvey declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this paper.
References
- [1].Dennison E, Mohamed MA, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2006;32:617–629. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2006.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Mathers CD, Loncar D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Med. 2006;3:e442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Szulc P. Association between cardiovascular diseases and osteoporosis-reappraisal. BoneKEy reports. 2012;1:144. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2012.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Szulc P, Samelson EJ, Sornay-Rendu E, Chapurlat R, Kiel DP. Severity of aortic calcification is positively associated with vertebral fracture in older men--a densitometry study in the STRAMBO cohort. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1177–1184. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2101-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Szulc P. Vascular calcification and fracture risk. Clinical cases in mineral and bone metabolism: the official journal of the Italian Society of Osteoporosis, Mineral Metabolism, and Skeletal Diseases. 2015;12(2):139–141. doi: 10.11138/ccmbm/2015.12.2.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Wang TK, Bolland MJ, Pelt NC, et al. Relationships between vascular calcification, calcium metabolism, bone density, and fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:2501–2509. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Szulc P, Blackwell T, Schousboe JT, et al. High hip fracture risk in men with severe aortic calcification: MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:968–75. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Gerber Y, Melton LJ, 3rd, Weston SA, et al. Association between myocardial infarction and fractures: an emerging phenomenon. Circulation. 2011;124:297–303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.007195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Sennerby U, Melhus H, Gedeborg R, et al. Cardiovascular diseases and risk of hip fracture. JAMA. 2009;302:1666–73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Majumdar SR, Ezekowitz JA, Lix LM, et al. Heart failure is a clinically and densitometrically independent risk factor for osteoporotic fractures: population-based cohort study of 45,509 subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1179–86. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Collins TC, Ewing SK, Diem SJ, et al. Peripheral arterial disease is associated with higher rates of hip bone loss and increased fracture risk in older men. Circulation. 2009;119:2305–12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.820993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Geusens P, Lems WF. Osteoimmunology and osteoporosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):242. doi: 10.1186/ar3375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Pietschmann P, Mechtcheriakova D, Meshcheryakova A, Foger-Samwald U, Ellinger I. Immunology of Osteoporosis: A Mini-Review. Gerontology. 2016;62(2):128–137. doi: 10.1159/000431091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Tousoulis D, Kampoli AM, Papageorgiou N, Androulakis E, Antoniades C, Toutouzas K, Stefanadis C. Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis: the role of inflammation. Curr Pharm Des. 2011;17(37):4089–4110. doi: 10.2174/138161211798764843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ, Bhasin S, Morley JE, Newman AB, Abellan van Kan G, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Breuille D, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(4):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Cheung KP, Taylor KR, Jameson JM. Immunomodulation at epithelial sites by obesity and metabolic disease. Immunologic research. 2012;52(3):182–199. doi: 10.1007/s12026-011-8261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Sardi F, Fassina L, Venturini L, Inguscio M, Guerriero F, Rolfo E, Ricevuti G. Alzheimer's disease, autoimmunity and inflammation. The good, the bad and the ugly. Autoimmunity reviews. 2011;11(2):149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2011.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].McFarlane SI, Muniyappa R, Shin JJ, et al. Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease: brittle bones and boned arteries, is there a link? Endocrine. 2004;23:1–10. doi: 10.1385/ENDO:23:1:01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Tanko LB, Christiansen C, Cox DA, et al. Relationship between osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20:1912–1920. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Walker-Bone K, Harvey NC, Ntani G, Tinati T, Jones GT, Smith BH, Macfarlane GJ, Cooper C. Chronic widespread bodily pain is increased among individuals with history of fracture: findings from UK Biobank. Archives of osteoporosis. 2016;11:1. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0252-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Harvey NC, Matthews P, Collins R, Cooper C. Osteoporosis epidemiology in UK Biobank: a unique opportunity for international researchers. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(12):2903–2905. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2508-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P, Danesh J, Downey P, Elliott P, Green J, Landray M, Liu B, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS medicine. 2015;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Chiang CH, Liu CJ, Chen PJ, Huang CC, Hsu CY, Chen ZY, et al. Hip Fracture and Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2013;28:404–11. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Kang JH, Chung SD, Xirasagar S, Jaw FS, Lin HC. Increased risk of stroke in the year after a hip fracture: a population-based follow-up study. Stroke. 2011;42:336–41. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Lampropoulos CE, Papaioannou I, David P, Cruz D. Osteoporosis — a risk factor for cardiovascular. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8:587–598. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Hyder JA, Allison MA, Barrett-Connor E, et al. Bone mineral density and atherosclerosis: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Abdominal Aortic Calcium Study. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209:283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.09.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Fisher A, Srikusalanukul W, Davis M, Smith P. Cardiovascular diseases in older patients with osteoporotic hip fracture: Prevalence, disturbances in mineral and bone metabolism, and bidirectional links. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:239–256. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S38856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Chen S-J, Lin C-S, Lin C-L, Kao C-H. Osteoporosis Is Associated With High Risk for Coronary Heart Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1146. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Demer LL, Tintut Y. Vascular calcification: pathobiology of a multifaceted disease. Circulation. 2008;117:2938–2948. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Massy ZA, Drueke TB. Vascular calcification. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22:405–12. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e328362155b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Eriksson AL, Movérare-Skrtic S, Ljunggren Ö, et al. High sensitivity CRP is an independent risk factor for all fractures and vertebral fractures in elderly men: the MrOS Sweden study. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29:418–23. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Rolland T, Boutroy S, Vilayphiou N, Blaizot S, Chapurlat R, Szulc P. Poor trabecular microarchitecture at the distal radius in older men with increased concentration of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein—the STRAMBO study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2012;90:496–506. doi: 10.1007/s00223-012-9598-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Almeida M, Han L, Martin-Millan M, Plotkin LI, Stewart SA, Roberson PK, Kousteni S, O’Brien CA, Bellido T, Parfitt AM, Weinstein RS, et al. Skeletal involution by age-associated oxidative stress and its acceleration by loss of sex steroids. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:27285–97. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702810200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Klop C, Welsing PM, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Elders PJ, Bijlsma JW, Leufkens HG, de Vries F. Mortality in British hip fracture patients, 2000-2010: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Bone. 2014;66:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Klop C, van Staa TP, Cooper C, Harvey NC, de Vries F. The epidemiology of mortality after fracture in England: variation by age, sex, time, geographic location, and ethnicity. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Jan;28(1):161–168. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3787-0. (2016) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.