Abstract
Background
To date, studies have shown that polymorphisms in an autophagy-related gene, IRGM, are linked with different diseases, especially autoimmune diseases. The present study aimed to examine the roles of IRGM polymorphisms in autoimmune thyroid diseases (AITD).
Methods
Three polymorphisms in IRGM gene (rs10065172, rs4958847, and rs13361189) were genotyped in 1569 participants (488 with Graves' disease, 292 with Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and 789 healthy controls) using PCR-based ligase detection reaction method. Gene-disease associations were evaluated for the three SNPs.
Results
T allele of rs10065172, A allele of rs4958847, and C allele of rs13361189 were all higher in Graves' disease patients than controls, and the ORs were OR = 1.207 (P = 0.022), OR = 1.207 (P = 0.027), and OR = 1.200 (P = 0.027), respectively. After adjusting for sex and age, rs10065172 and rs13361189 were still associated with GD under both the allele model and dominant model, and the adjusted ORs for rs10065172 were 1.20 (P = 0.033) and 1.33 (P = 0.024), while the adjusted ORs for rs13361189 were 1.19 (P = 0.042) and 1.33 (P = 0.026), respectively. No significant difference was found between Hashimoto's thyroiditis patients and controls. Haplotype analysis found that CTA frequency was distinguishingly higher in Graves' disease patients (OR = 1.195, P = 0.030). The frequency of TCG haplotype was distinguishingly lower in AITD and Graves' disease patients (OR = 0.861, P = 0.044; OR = 0.816, P = 0.017).
Conclusions
Our study reveals IRGM as a susceptibility gene of AITD and Graves' disease for the first time.
1. Introduction
Autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is the most prevalent autoimmune disease and mainly has two diverse types, Graves' disease (GD) and Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). AITD has a huge preponderance of females [1]. AITDs are characterized by lymphocytic infiltration responsive to thyroid antigens including thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), thyroid antigens including thyroglobulin (Tg), and thyroid peroxidase (TPO) [2]. In GD, anti-TSHR autoantibodies can bind to TSHR and stimulate the production and secretion of thyroid hormones, resulting in hyperthyroidism [3]. HT is characterized by the presence of thyroid autoantibodies against TPO and Tg [4].
Although the etiology of AITD remains elusive, the current paradigm is that the interplay between gene and environmental factors causes AITD [5, 6]. It is estimated that genetic factor accounts for about 70–80% of liability to the development of AITD [7]. The HLA-DR locus is the most important susceptibility gene involved in AITD [5]. Other identified susceptibility genes of AITD mainly have the following two groups: (1) immunity-related genes: protein tyrosine phosphatase-22 (PTPN22), CD40, CTLA4, and so on; (2) thyroid related genes: thyroglobulin (TG) and thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) genes [5].
Autophagy is an “autodigestive” process, which plays an important role in the delivery of intracellular components for terminal degradation and recycling [8]. This process has been associated with diverse aspects of innate and adaptive immunity [9], and abnormalities in the autophagic pathway have been involved in numerous autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and multiple sclerosis [10]. Immunity-related guanosine triphosphatase is critically important in defending against pathogens through regulating the progress of autophagy [11]. In the human genome, only immunity-related guanosine triphosphatase family M (IRGM) encodes a functional IRG among the three IRG genes (IRGC, IRGQ, and IRGM) [12]. IRGM is a key autophagy-related molecule, and it is also an important regulator involved in inflammation, which can prevent unwanted inflammation and protect cells from oxidative stress by regulating the engulfment of apoptotic cells [13]. Also, it can regulate the levels of cytokines, such as IL-1β and interferon gamma (INF-γ), through affecting the signaling pathway of toll-like receptor (TLR) [14]. To date, several polymorphisms in IRGM gene are reported to be linked with different diseases, especially autoimmune diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and SLE [10]. However, it is unknown whether IRGM gene variations are associated with AITD. Therefore, we conducted a case-control study to clarify this important issue.
2. Methods
2.1. Patients and Controls
In this study, a total of 780 patients with AITD (488 with GD and 292 with HT) were enrolled consecutively from the Outpatient Department of Endocrinology of Jinshan Hospital of Fudan University from November 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016, and 789 healthy controls were from the Health Check-Up Center of the same hospital during the same period. All subjects were south descendants of China. Individuals having other obvious chronic diseases were excluded from patient group. Individuals with thyroid disease or any other autoimmune disease were excluded from control group. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
GD was diagnosed with both clinical findings of hyperthyroidism and laboratory data, such as decreased TSH value, elevated thyroid hormones or anti-thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb), anti-thyroid peroxide antibody (TPOAb), and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb). The diagnosis of HT was established by positive status of anti-thyroid peroxide antibody (TPOAb) or anti-thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb).
2.2. DNA Extraction
We collected 1 ml of peripheral venous blood in a tube containing ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) from each participant. The genomic DNA from peripheral blood was isolated using RelaxGene Blood DNA System (Tiangen Biotech Company, Beijing, China) according to the manufacture's protocol. The purity and concentration of all DNA samples were then detected.
2.3. SNP Selection and Genotyping
Three SNPs (rs10065172/rs4958847/rs13361189) of IRGM gene were selected from the Hapmap CHB data [15] with the following criteria: minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.05, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) with P > 0.001, and logarithm of odds (LOD) > 3.0. These three SNPs were genotyped by PCR-based ligase detection reaction (LDR) method used in our previous studies [16–18]. The PCR condition was initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 62°C for 90 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min with 40 cycles and final extension at 65°C for 10 min. Primer sequences of the targeted loci are as follows:
-
rs10065172
- Forward: CCCTTCGAAACACAGGACAT
- Reverse: TCATGCTGAATTGTGCAGAT
-
rs4958847
- Forward: TGGATCCATCCATTTTCAACT
- Reverse: TTCCAAAATATTTGGTAGTCATGC
-
rs13361189
- Forward: TGTCGTACCCAAGCAGAGTG
- Reverse: TCTAAACTGTACCCGCTGAG
The LDR was performed using denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, 40 cycles of annealing at 94°C for 15 s, and extension at 50°C for 25 s.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. We used Chi-square (χ2) test to evaluate the differences in the frequencies of alleles, genotypes and haplotypes among different groups, and the odds ratios (OR) were also calculated out. HWE test, linkage disequilibrium (LD) test, and haplotype frequencies were analyzed using Haploview 4.2. Logistic regression analysis was also performed, and age and gender were used as confounding factors in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. SPSS (Version 17.0) was used for statistical analysis and P value less than 0.05 suggested significant outcomes.
3. Results
3.1. Clinical Data
The clinical data of all subjects were shown in Table 1. In this study, we investigated 780 AITD patients (24.10% male and 75.90% female, mean age: 35.83 years), including 488 GD patients (30.53% male and 69.47% female, mean age: 36.65 years) and 292 HT patients (13.36% male and 86.64% female, mean age: 34.45 years). About 22.82% of AITD patients, 23.36% of GD patients, and 21.92% of HT patients had family history. The percentage of AITD, GD, and HT patients with TPOAb positive was 70.77%, 66.39%, and 78.08%, respectively, while the percentage of AITD, GD, and HT patients with TGAb positive was 80.51%, 79.10%, and 82.88%, respectively. The mean age of 789 healthy controls (34.35% male and 65.65% female) was 39.71 years.
Table 1.
AITD | GD | HT | Control | |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | 780 | 488 | 292 | 789 |
Gender | ||||
Male | 188 (24.10%) | 149 (30.53%) | 39 (13.36%) | 271 (34.35%) |
Female | 592 (75.90%) | 339 (69.47%) | 253 (86.64%) | 518 (65.65%) |
Age (mean ± s.d.) | 35.83 ± 14.39 | 36.65 ± 14.73 | 34.45 ± 13.70 | 39.71 ± 8.34 |
Family history (+) | 178 (22.82%) | 114 (23.36%) | 64 (21.92%) | - |
Titer of antibodies | ||||
TPOAb (+) | 552 (70.77%) | 324 (66.39%) | 228 (78.08%) | - |
TGAb (+) | 628 (80.51%) | 386 (79.10%) | 242 (82.88%) | - |
Thyroid size | - | |||
Normal size | 122 (15.64%) | 83 (17.008%) | 39 (13.36%) | - |
I degree | 135 (17.31%) | 88 (18.033%) | 47 (16.10%) | - |
II degree | 435 (55.77%) | 247 (50.615%) | 188 (64.38%) | - |
III degree | 88 (11.28%) | 70 (14.344%) | 18 (6.16%) | - |
AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; GD, Graves' disease; HT, Hashimoto's thyroiditis; TPOAb, anti-thyroid peroxide antibody; TgAb, anti-thyroglobulin antibody.
3.2. Allele and Genotype Analyses
The genotype distributions of IRGM SNPs (rs10065172/rs4958847/rs13361189) were in HWE in both the case groups and control group (P > 0.05). Table 2 showed the data of IRGM gene polymorphisms in AITD cases and controls. No distinguishing difference was found in both allele and genotype distributions of the three loci between cases and controls (P > 0.05).
Table 2.
SNP | Genotype/Allele | Control (%) | AITD (%) | P | OR | 95% CI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs10065172 | CC | 275 (34.854) | 238 (30.51) | |||
CT | 380 (48.162) | 398 (51.03) | 0.183 | - | - | |
TT | 134 (16.984) | 144 (18.46) | ||||
C | 930 (58.94) | 874 (56.03) | 0.099 | 1.126 | 0.978-1.298 | |
T | 648 (41.06) | 686 (43.97) | ||||
rs4958847 | AA | 293 (37.14) | 325 (41.67) | |||
AG | 380 (48.16) | 355 (45.51) | 0.162 | - | - | |
GG | 116 (14.70) | 100 (12.82) | ||||
A | 966 (61.22) | 1005 (64.42) | 0.063 | 0.872 | 0.754-1.008 | |
G | 612 (38.78) | 555 (35.58) | ||||
rs13361189 | TT | 275 (34.85) | 239 (30.64) | |||
CT | 379 (48.04) | 398 (51.03) | 0.205 | - | - | |
CC | 135 (17.11) | 143 (18.33) | ||||
T | 929 (58.87) | 876 (56.15) | ||||
C | 649 (41.13) | 684 (43.85) | 0.124 | 1.118 | 0.970-1.288 |
AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals.
The distributions of genetic frequencies of IRGM polymorphisms in GD patients, HT patients, and controls were shown in Table 3. In GD patients, the genotype distributions of the rs10065172 and rs13361189 showed a marginally significant trend compared with those of the controls, and P was 0.052 and 0.056, respectively. For rs4958847, no distinguishing difference in the genotype of IRGM polymorphisms was found between GD cases and controls. In GD patients, the minor T allele of rs10065172 was higher than controls (45.70% versus 41.06%, OR = 1.207, 95% CI = 1.027-1.418, P = 0.022,). For rs4958847, the minor allele A frequency was significantly higher in GD groups than controls (65.57% versus 61.22%, OR = 1.207, 95% CI = 1.022-1.425, P = 0.027). GD patients also had an increased frequency of allele C in rs13361189 compared with the controls (45.59% versus 41.13%, OR = 1.200, 95% CI = 1.021-1.409, P = 0.027). As Table 4 showed, after adjusting for sex and age, rs10065172 and rs13361189 were still associated with GD under both the allele model and dominant model, and the adjusted ORs for rs10065172 were 1.20 (P = 0.033) and 1.33 (P = 0.024), while the adjusted ORs for rs13361189 were 1.19 (P = 0.042) and 1.33 (P = 0.026), respectively. However, there was no distinguishing difference between HT patients and controls.
Table 3.
SNP | Control (%) | GD (%) | P | OR (95% CI) | HT (%) | P | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rs10065172 | |||||||
CC | 275 (34.854) | 139 (28.48) | 99 (33.90) | ||||
CT | 380 (48.162) | 252 (51.64) | 0.052 | - | 146 (50.00) | 0.859 | - |
TT | 134 (16.984) | 97 (19.88) | 47 (16.10) | ||||
C | 930 (58.94) | 530 (54.30) | 0.022 | 1.208 (1.028-1.419) | 344 (58.90) | 0.990 | 1.001 (0.826-1.214) |
T | 648 (41.06) | 446 (45.70) | 240 (41.10) | ||||
rs4958847 | |||||||
AA | 293 (37.14) | 210 (43.00) | 115 (39.4) | ||||
AG | 380 (48.16) | 220 (45.10) | 0.081 | - | 135 (46.2) | 0.792 | - |
GG | 116 (14.70) | 58 (11.90) | 42 (14.4) | ||||
A | 966 (61.22) | 640 (65.57) | 0.027 | 0.829 (0.702-0.979) | 365 (62.50) | 0.586 | 0.947 (0.779-1.152) |
G | 612 (38.78) | 336 (34.43) | 219 (37.50) | ||||
rs13361189 | |||||||
TT | 275 (34.85) | 139 (28.50) | 100 (34.25) | ||||
CT | 379 (48.04) | 253 (51.80) | 0.056 | - | 145 (49.66) | 0.874 | - |
CC | 135 (17.11) | 96 (19.70) | 47 (16.09) | 0.874 | - | ||
T | 929 (58.87) | 531 (54.41) | 0.027 | 1.200 (1.021-1.409) | 345 (59.08) | 0.932 | 0.992 (0.818-1.203) |
C | 649 (41.13) | 445 (45.59) | 239 (40.92) |
GD, Graves' disease; HT, Hashimoto's thyroiditis; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals.
Table 4.
Disease | Model | Unadjusted P | Unadjusted OR (95% CI) | Adjusted P | Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AITD | rs10065172 | ||||
Allele model | 0.097 | 1.13 (0.98-1.30) | 0.145 | 1.11 (0.96-0.98) | |
Dominant model | 0.067 | 1.22 (0.99-1.51) | 0.108 | 1.19 (0.96-1.48) | |
rs4958847 | |||||
Allele model | 0.063 | 0.87 (0.75-1.01) | 0.204 | 0.91 (0.78-1.05) | |
Dominant model | 0.066 | 0.83 (0.68-1.01) | 0.169 | 0.86 (0.70-1.06) | |
rs13361189 | |||||
Allele model | 0.121 | 1.12 (0.97-1.29) | 0.179 | 1.10 (0.96-1.28) | |
Dominant model | 0.076 | 1.21 (0.98-1.50) | 0.122 | 1.19 (0.96-1.47) | |
| |||||
GD | rs10065172 | ||||
Allele model | 0.021 | 1.21 (1.03-1.42) | 0.033 | 1.20 (1.02-1.41) | |
Dominant model | 0.018 | 1.34 (1.05-1.72) | 0.024 | 1.33 (1.04-1.70) | |
rs4958847 | |||||
Allele model | 0.027 | 0.83 (0.70-0.98) | 0.084 | 0.86 (0.73-1.02) | |
Dominant model | 0.036 | 0.78 (0.62-0.98) | 0.104 | 0.82 (0.65-1.04) | |
rs13361189 | |||||
Allele model | 0.026 | 1.20 (1.02-1.41) | 0.042 | 1.19 (1.01-1.40) | |
Dominant model | 0.018 | 1.34 (1.05-1.72) | 0.026 | 1.33 (1.03-1.70) | |
| |||||
HT | rs10065172 | ||||
Allele model | 0.990 | 1.00 (0.83-1.22) | 0.763 | 1.03 (0.84-1.27) | |
Dominant model | 0.771 | 1.04 (0.79-1.38) | 0.709 | 1.06 (0.79-1.42) | |
rs4958847 | |||||
Allele model | 0.585 | 0.95 (0.78-1.15) | 0.783 | 0.97 (0.79-1.19) | |
Dominant model | 0.498 | 0.91 (0.69-1.20) | 0.535 | 0.91 (0.68-1.22) | |
rs13361189 | |||||
Allele model | 0.932 | 0.99 (0.82-1.20) | 0.823 | 1.02 (0.83-1.26) | |
Dominant model | 0.852 | 1.03 (0.77-1.36) | 0.774 | 1.04 (0.78-1.40) |
AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; GD, Graves' disease; HT, Hashimoto's thyroiditis; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals.
3.3. Haplotype Analysis
Three haplotypes were detected in the IRGM gene, including CTA, TCG, and TCA. As Table 5 displayed, in AITD patients, only the frequency of TCG haplotype was significantly lower than that in controls (35.22% versus 38.75%, OR = 0.861, 95% CI = 0.745-0.996, P = 0.044). Compared with controls, CTA haplotype had an increased frequency in GD patients (45.28% versus 40.98%, OR = 1.195, 95% CI = 1.017-1.404, P = 0.030). In contrast, the TCG haplotype was lower in GD cases (33.98% versus 38.75%, OR = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.690-0.964, P = 0.017). However, all the three haplotypes were not associated with HT.
Table 5.
Haplotype | Controls (%) | AITD | P | OR (95%CI) | GD (%) | P | OR (95%CI) | HT (%) | P | OR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA | 645 (40.98) |
679 (43.64) |
0.132 | 1.115 (0.968-1.285) | 441 (45.28) | 0.030 | 1.195 (1.017-1.404) |
238 (40.89) | 0.975 | 0.997 (0.822-1.210) |
TCG | 610 (38.75) |
548 (35.22) |
0.044 | 0.861 (0.745-0.996) | 331 (33.98) | 0.017 | 0.816 (0.690-0.964) |
218 (37.46) | 0.568 | 0.944 (0.776-1.149) |
TCA | 318 (20.20) |
321 (20.63) |
0.734 | 1.031 (0.866-1.226) | 197 (20.23) | 0.989 | 1.001 (0.821-1.222) |
124 (21.31) | 0.560 | 1.072 (0.849-1.354) |
AITD, autoimmune thyroid disease; GD, Graves' disease; HT, Hashimoto's thyroiditis; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence intervals.
3.4. Genotype and Clinical Phenotype Correlations
No correlation was found between the genotype or allele variants of the three tested SNPs and the clinical phenotypes, including family history, positive or negative antibodies (TGAb and TPOAb), thyroid size, and treatment outcomes (P > 0.05) (data not shown).
4. Discussion
IRGM plays an important role in autophagy [19]. IRGM gene can induce autophagy by encoding a GTP-binding protein [14]. IRGM inhibition can result in impaired autophagy [11]. IRGM genetic polymorphisms were confirmed to be related to many kinds of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Song et al. showed that IRGM rs10065172 was related to active tuberculosis in a Korean population [12]. Lu et al. reported that IRGM SNPs rs10065172 and rs13361189 were protective factors against latent TB progression in a Chinese population [20]. The polymorphism of IRGM rs13361189 was found to be related to leprosy by affecting the production of IL-4, IL-6, and INF-γ [21]. Our previous genetic studies also found that variants of inflammation and cytokine related genes were associated with AITD (Supplementary Table 1). Significant correlation between Crohn's disease (CD) and the C allele of rs13361189 (OR= 1.33) of the IRGM gene was noted in an Indian Population [22]. Besides, a recent study suggested IRGM polymorphisms were related to gastric cancer in Chinese [23]. In accordance with previous findings, IRGM rs13361189 and rs4958847 polymorphisms were confirmed to be crucial for CD susceptibility and phenotype modulation [24]. Interestingly, it was reported that the polymorphisms of IRGM gene were involved in susceptibility to SLE [25].
The present study is the first to investigate the relationship between the IRGM SNPs (rs10065172, rs4958847, and rs13361189) and susceptibility to AITD. Our allele and genotype results showed that T allele of rs10065172, A allele of rs4958847, and C allele of rs13361189 were higher in GD patients. After adjusting for sex and age, rs10065172 and rs13361189 were still associated with GD under both the allele model and dominant model, indicating that IRGM gene was associated with GD and might participate in the pathogenesis of GD and act as a risk factor. In GD, although the exact function of the IRGM SNPs is not fully elucidated, IRGM is possibly involved in the pathogenesis of GD because of its crucial role in autophagy, and autophagy has a vital function in innate and adaptive immunity. The polymorphism of IRGM gene may lead to the impaired autophagy, resulting in the disorder of immunity function, which needs to be explored by further studies. However, neither the allele nor genotype of rs10065172, rs4958847, and rs13361189 was related to HT, indicating that the three SNPs were not involved in the pathogenesis of HT. These different results of in the relationship of IRGM SNPs with GD and HT may be caused by their different etiology. Furthermore, haplotype analysis also suggested some roles of IRGM SNPs in AITD and GD.
In stratified analyses by clinical phenotype, no statistical significance of allele and genotype distributions was found between cases with each clinical phenotype and those without. The lack of significant findings may be because of the heterogeneity of environment or genetic factors in Chinese Han population and the relatively limited sample size caused by stratification. Further functional studies with large number of participants deserve continuing investigation.
In summary, our study is the first to suggest that IRGM rs10065172, rs4958847, and rs13361189 are related to GD in terms of both allele and haplotype frequencies, and TCG haplotype plays a protective role in AITD and GD. More studies with large number of participants are needed to further investigate the role of IRGM genetic polymorphisms in susceptibility to AITD.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all of the participants who took part in the studies. This project was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670722 and 81471004) and the Key Disciplines Development of Shanghai Jinshan District (JSZK2015A02).
Abbreviations
- IRGM:
Immunity-related guanosine triphosphatase family M
- SNPs:
Single nucleotide polymorphisms
- AITD:
Autoimmune thyroid disease
- GD:
Graves' disease
- HT:
Hashimoto's thyroiditis
- TSHR:
Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor
- Tg:
Thyroglobulin
- TPO:
Thyroid peroxidase
- CTLA4:
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4
- PTPN22:
Protein tyrosine phosphatase-22
- IRGs:
Immunity-related guanosine triphosphatase
- TLR:
Toll-like receptor
- IBD:
Inflammatory bowel disease
- SLE:
Systemic lupus erythematosus
- TRAb:
Anti-thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody
- TPOAb:
Anti-thyroid peroxide antibody
- TgAb:
Anti-thyroglobulin antibody
- EDTA:
Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid
- MAF:
Minor allele frequency
- HWE:
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium
- LOD:
Logarithm of odds
- PCR:
Polymerase chain reaction
- LDR:
Ligase detection reaction
- OR:
Odds ratio
- CI:
Confidence interval
- LD:
Linkage disequilibrium
- TB:
Tuberculosis
- INF-γ:
Interferon gamma
- CD:
Crohn's disease
- GC:
Gastric cancer.
Data Availability
The data analyzed during this study have been provided in the manuscript and any further information can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.
Additional Points
Highlights. (i) Polymorphisms of rs10065172 and rs13361189 were associated with GD. (ii) The CTA haplotype was associated with GD. (iii) The TCG haplotype was associated with AITD and GD.
Ethical Approval
This work was approved by the Ethics Committee of Jinshan Hospital, Fudan University.
Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Disclosure
Qiu-ming Yao and Yuan-feng Zhu are co-first authors of this paper.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest and they are all responsible for the content of this paper.
Authors' Contributions
Qiuming Yao conducted the research and wrote the manuscript. Yuan-feng Zhu conducted the research and analyzed the data. Wen Wang, Zhen-yu Song, Xiao-qing Shao, Ling Li, Rong-hua Song, Xiao-fei An, Qiu Qin, and Qian Li contributed to the recruitment of the subject and the collection of the clinical data. Jin-an Zhang designed the study and corrected the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. Qiu-ming Yao and Yuan-feng Zhu contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary Materials
References
- 1.Effraimidis G., Wiersinga W. M. Mechanisms in endocrinology: autoimmune thyroid disease: old and new players. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2014;170(6):R241–R252. doi: 10.1530/eje-14-0047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zaaber I., Mestiri S., Hammedi H., et al. Association of Interleukin-1B and Interleukin-4 Gene Variants with Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases in Tunisian Population. Immunological Investigations. 2016;45(4):284–297. doi: 10.3109/08820139.2016.1153650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zaaber I., Rancier M., Stathopoulou M. G., et al. Plasma VEGF-related polymorphisms are implied in autoimmune thyroid diseases. Autoimmunity. 2016;49(4):229–235. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2016.1151005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brčić L., Barić A., Gračan S., et al. Association of established thyroid peroxidase autoantibody (TPOAb) genetic variants with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Autoimmunity. 2016;49(7):480–485. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2016.1191475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tomer Y. Genetic susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease: past, present, and future. Thyroid. 2010;20(7):715–725. doi: 10.1089/thy.2010.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tomer Y., Huber A. The etiology of autoimmune thyroid disease: a story of genes and environment. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2009;32(3-4):231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tanda M. L., Piantanida E., Lai A., et al. Thyroid autoimmunity and environment. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et métabolisme. 2009;41(6):436–442. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crotzer V. L., Blum J. S. Autophagy and adaptive immunity. The Journal of Immunology. 2010;131(1):9–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03321.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Virgin H. W., Levine B. Autophagy genes in immunity. Nature Immunology. 2009;10(5):461–470. doi: 10.1038/ni.1726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yang Z., Goronzy J. J., Weyand C. M. Autophagy in autoimmune disease. Journal of Molecular Medicine. 2015;93(7):707–717. doi: 10.1007/s00109-015-1297-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Singh S. B., Davis A. S., Taylor G. A., Deretic V. Human IRGM induces autophagy to eliminate intracellular mycobacteria. Science. 2006;313(5792):1438–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.1129577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Song J. H., Kim S. Y., Chung K. S., et al. Association between genetic variants in the IRGM gene and tuberculosis in a Korean population. Infection. 2014;42(4):655–660. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0604-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Grégoire I. P., Rabourdin-Combe C., Faure M. Autophagy and RNA virus interactomes reveal IRGM as a common target. Autophagy. 2012;8(7):1136–1137. doi: 10.4161/auto.20339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kim B.-H., Shenoy A. R., Kumar P., Bradfield C. J., MacMicking J. D. IFN-inducible GTPases in host cell defense. Cell Host & Microbe. 2012;12(4):432–444. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Barrett J. C., Fry B., Maller J., Daly M. J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–265. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Song R., Wang Q., Yao Q., et al. TNFSF4 Gene Variations Are Related to Early-Onset Autoimmune Thyroid Diseases and Hypothyroidism of Hashimoto’s Thyroiditis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016;17(8):p. 1369. doi: 10.3390/ijms17081369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yan N., Meng S., Song R.-H., et al. Polymorphism of IL37 gene as a protective factor for autoimmune thyroid disease. Molecular Endocrinology. 2015;55(3):209–218. doi: 10.1530/JME-15-0144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cai T., Li J., An X., et al. Polymorphisms in MIR499A and MIR125A gene are associated with autoimmune thyroid diseases. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2017;440:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2016.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lu X. C., Tao Y., Wu C., et al. Association between variants of the autophagy related gene - IRGM and susceptibility to Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080602.e80602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lu Y., Li Q., Peng J., et al. Association of autophagy-related IRGM polymorphisms with latent versus active tuberculosis infection in a Chinese population. Tuberculosis. 2016;97:47–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2016.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yang D., Chen J., Shi C., Jing Z., Song N. Autophagy gene polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to leprosy by affecting inflammatory cytokines. Inflammation. 2014;37(2):593–598. doi: 10.1007/s10753-013-9773-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Baskaran K., Pugazhendhi S., Ramakrishna B. S. Association of IRGM gene mutations with inflammatory bowel disease in the Indian population. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106863.e106863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Castaño-Rodríguez N., Kaakoush N. O., Goh K.-L., Fock K. M., Mitchell H. M. Autophagy in Helicobacter pylori Infection and Related Gastric Cancer. Helicobacter. 2015;20(5):353–369. doi: 10.1111/hel.12211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rufini S., Ciccacci C., Di Fusco D., et al. Autophagy and inflammatory bowel disease: Association between variants of the autophagy-related IRGM gene and susceptibility to Crohn's disease. Digestive and Liver Disease. 2015;47(9):744–750. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhou X.-J., Lu X.-L., Lv J.-C., et al. Genetic association of PRDM1-ATG5 intergenic region and autophagy with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese population. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 2011;70(7):1330–1337. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.140111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data analyzed during this study have been provided in the manuscript and any further information can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.