Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2018 Jun 22;6:e5025. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5025

A Miocene pygmy right whale fossil from Australia

Felix G Marx 1,2,3,, Travis Park 2,4, Erich MG Fitzgerald 3,4,5, Alistair R Evans 2,3
Editor: Mark Young
PMCID: PMC6016540  PMID: 29942692

Abstract

Neobalaenines are an enigmatic group of baleen whales represented today by a single living species: the pygmy right whale, Caperea marginata, found only in the Southern Hemisphere. Molecular divergence estimates date the origin of pygmy right whales to 22–26 Ma, yet so far there are only three confirmed fossil occurrences. Here, we describe an isolated periotic from the latest Miocene of Victoria (Australia). The new fossil shows all the hallmarks of Caperea, making it the second-oldest described neobalaenine, and the oldest record of the genus. Overall, the new specimen resembles C. marginata in its external morphology and details of the cochlea, but is more archaic in it having a hypertrophied suprameatal area and a greater number of cochlear turns. The presence of Caperea in Australian waters during the Late Miocene matches the distribution of the living species, and supports a southern origin for pygmy right whales.

Keywords: Neobalaeninae, Cetotheriidae, Evolution, Fossil, Victoria, Caperea, Cochlea, Inner ear

Introduction

The living pygmy right whale, Caperea marginata (Gray, 1846), is the smallest living baleen whale, and the only living representative of its lineage (Neobalaeninae). Its ecology and behaviour remains poorly understood, but it stands apart from all other whales in its skeletal structure (Beddard, 1901; Buchholtz, 2011), visual capabilities (Meredith et al., 2013), and even the evolution of its mitochondrial tRNAs (Montelli et al., 2016).

The evolution of pygmy right whales is equally obscure, with their phylogenetic position being controversial (Bisconti, 2015; Boessenecker & Fordyce, 2015; El Adli, Deméré & Boessenecker, 2014; Fordyce & Marx, 2013; Gol’din & Steeman, 2015; Marx & Fordyce, 2016; McGowen, Spaulding & Gatesy, 2009), and their fossil record being all but non-existent. Even though molecular divergence estimates date the origin of neobalaenines to 26–22 Ma (McGowen, Spaulding & Gatesy, 2009; Steeman et al., 2009), fossils are currently limited to just Miocaperea pulchra (Bisconti, 2012) from the Late Miocene of Peru, and two Pleistocene Caperea-like specimens from the Northern Hemisphere (Tsai et al., 2017). Additional Late Miocene material from Argentina (Buono et al., 2014) and Australia (Fitzgerald, 2012) is fragmentary, and uncertainly identified. Cetotheriids are closely related to neobalaenines, and generally more abundant; yet, based on the age of Miocaperea, pygmy right whales diverged from other cetotheriids at least prior to 8 Ma, and probably considerably earlier.

The global dearth of pygmy right whale fossils is striking, and suggests that neobalaenines have either been overlooked or, throughout their evolution, have been rare and/or geographically restricted. Here, we report a new fossil of Caperea from the latest Miocene of southern Australia—the second oldest confirmed neobalaenine, and the oldest record of the genus—and discuss its implications for the evolution and biogeography of the lineage as a whole.

Material and Methods

Collection and photography

The specimen was collected in the first half of the 20th century by G. B. Pritchard, and subsequently formed part of the stratigraphic reference collection at Museums Victoria, Melbourne, until it was identified by FGM and EMGF in 2017. Morphological terminology follows Mead & Fordyce (2009), unless indicated. For the figures, photographs of the specimen were digitally focus stacked in Photoshop CS6.

Scanning technique

The periotic was scanned using the Zeiss Xradia 520 Versa (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at the Monash University X-ray Microscopy Facility for Imaging Geo-materials (XMFIG) The raw CT data were compiled into a 3D model, and digital endocasts of the cochlea segmented using the visualisation software package Avizo (Version 9.2.0 Standard) (FEI). 3D models of both the periotic and the inner ear are available as Supplemental Information.

Cochlear measurements

Basic measurements of the internal structures of the cochlea were taken using the Measure, Slice and Spline Probe tools in Avizo, following the protocols of Park, Fitzgerald & Evans (2016), and subsequently used to calculate standard ratios (axial pitch and cochlear slope) used to quantify cochlear shape (Ketten & Wartzok, 1990). The radii ratio (and thus also the low frequency hearing limit) could not be calculated, as damage prevented us from obtaining a basal radius. See Park et al. (2017b) for a detailed description of all measurements and procedures.

Results

Systematic palaeontology

Cetacea Brisson, 1762
Mysticeti Gray, 1864
Cetotheriidae Brandt, 1872
Neobalaeninae Gray, 1873
CapereaGray, 1864
Caperea sp.
Figs. 14

Figure 1. Caperea sp. (NMV P233333), right periotic—photographs.

Figure 1

(A) medial, (B) ventral, (C) dorsal, (D) anterior and (E) posterior view. Photo credit: Felix G. Marx.

Figure 4. Comparison of Caperea sp. with extant C. marginata.

Figure 4

(A, D) Caperea sp. (NMV P233333) and (B, C) extant C. marginata (NMV C28531) in (A, B) ventral and (C, D) posterior view. Photo credit: Felix G. Marx.

Referred material. NMV P233333, partial right periotic preserving the pars cochlearis, body of the periotic, and suprameatal area.

Locality and horizon. Beaumaris Bay, northeast side of Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, southeast Australia, near 37°59′34″S, 145°02′32″E. At Beaumaris, the basal phosphatic nodule bed and overlying ∼7 metres of the shallow marine Sandringham Sandstone (VandenBerg, 2016) produce a rich, albeit largely unpublished, assemblage of marine and rare terrestrial vertebrates (see Fitzgerald & Kool, 2015, and references therein). Although NMV P233333 was originally collected as float, its polished surfaces suggest that it was derived from the phosphatic nodule bed at the base of the Sandringham Sandstone. 87Sr/86Sr ratios from phosphatic intraclasts within the latter horizon yield dates ranging from 6.24–5.38 Ma, with dates of 5.98 and 5.59 Ma within 1 metre above the phosphatic nodule bed (Dickinson & Wallace, 2009). These data suggest that NMV P233333 is latest Miocene (Messinian) in age, between 6.2 and 5.4 Ma.

Description

External anatomy. The new specimen from Australia preserves much of the pars cochlearis, except for its anteromedial corner (Figs. 1 and 2). The surface is abraded, but fractured areas are generally flattened and delimited by a clearly defined rim. The anterior and compound posterior processes are lost, but breakage indicates the shape and size of their respective attachments. Notably, the base of the anterior process is small, suggesting that it was separated from the body of the periotic by a marked constriction.

Figure 2. Caperea sp. (NMV P233333), right periotic—explanatory line drawings.

Figure 2

Photo credit: Felix G. Marx.

In medial view (Figs. 1A and 2A), the pars cochlearis is longer (ca 29 mm) than high, with no signs of elongation along its preserved cranial rim. The medial surface is eroded, making it impossible to tell whether a promontorial groove was present. The suprameatal area—specifically, the pyramidal process—is hypertrophied, and forms a broadly triangular protuberance that rises dorsally well above the level of the pars cochlearis. Medially, this protuberance is excavated by a sulcus originating from the dorsal vestibular area.

The mallear fossa is either poorly defined or, probably, worn away. The fenestra cochleae is slightly recessed into the posterior face of the pars cochlearis, but remains clearly visible. The posterior cochlear crest (see Ekdale, Berta & Demere (2011) for a discussion of this term) is small and effectively absent. Abrasion likely somewhat reduced its length, but—judging from the generally good state of preservation in this area—not to a major degree. Posterolateral to the fenestra cochleae, the pars cochlearis somewhat bulges posteriorly, further precluding the presence of a large posterior cochlear crest.

In ventral view (Figs. 1B and 2B), the fenestra vestibuli is large (ca 6.5 mm) and slightly oval. There is no distal opening of the facial canal; instead, the latter is entirely open, and developed as a sulcus running lateral to the fenestra vestibuli and on to the anterior face of the pars cochlearis. Medially and laterally, the distal portion of the canal is sheltered by the pars cochlearis and the base of the anterior process, respectively, suggesting that the lack of a bony floor is genuine and not simply a result of abrasion. The fossa for the stapedial muscle is small, and notably offset from the facial sulcus.

In dorsal view (Figs. 1C and 2C), the dorsal vestibular area is rounded, ca 5.5 mm in diameter, and approximately aligned with the proximal portion of the facial canal and the aperture for the cochlear aqueduct. The crista transversa is robust and widely separates the dorsal vestibular area from the facial canal. The aperture for the cochlear aqueduct is approximately circular (max. diameter 2.5 mm), and located medial to the level of the aperture for the vestibular aqueduct. There is no anteroposterior overlap of the two apertures, and thus no en echelon arrangement as seen in balaenopteroids (Ekdale, Berta & Demere, 2011). The aperture for the vestibular aqueduct is developed as a broad slit (max. diameter 8 mm).

In anterior view (Figs. 1D and 2D), the facial canal extends to the cranial rim of the pars cochlearis. It is unclear whether the canal was entirely exposed in life, or whether its proximal portion was once floored, as seen in C. marginata. Lateral to the facial sulcus, and anterior to the suprameatal area, there is a small area of spongy bone, as seen in C. marginata and a variety of other chaeomysticetes. In posterior view (Figs. 1E and 2E), the fenestra cochleae is large (ca 9 mm), oval, and somewhat oblique relative to the dorsoventral axis of the pars cochlearis. The fenestra cochleae and aperture of the cochlear aqueduct are well separated.

Inner ear. The basalmost quarter turn of the cochlea was partially damaged, but enough remained to enable its reconstruction (Fig. 3). The cochlea completes 2.5 turns and bears a distinct tympanal recess, with the scala tympani being inflated radially along approximately the first half turn of the cochlear canal. In vestibular view, the apical turn is tightly coiled and encloses a small open space. The entire apical turn overlaps the section of the cochlear canal immediately below. The reconstructed portion of the cochlea has a height of 12.89 mm, a width of 16.33 mm, a volume of 856.63 mm3, and a canal length of 52.37 mm; inside the basal turn, the secondary spiral lamina extends for 15.71 mm, equal to approximately 30% of the total length of the cochlear canal. The basal ratio is 0.79, the axial pitch 5.16, and the cochlear slope 0.10.

Figure 3. Inner ear of Caperea sp. (NMV P233333).

Figure 3

Digital model reconstructed from microCT data in (A) anterior, (B) lateral, (C) dorsal and (D) vestibular view.

Discussion and Conclusions

Comparisons

NMV P233333 closely resembles extant C. marginata, but not Miocaperea (Bisconti, 2012), in having a (partially) open facial canal, a nearly absent posterior cochlear crest, and a distinct neck separating the anterior process from the body of the periotic (Fig. 4). In addition, both share the presence of relatively large fenestrae cochleae and vestibuli; the oblique orientation of the fenestra cochleae; a well-developed pyramidal process; and the retention of a small, circular aperture for the cochlear aqueduct that is well separated from the aperture for vestibular aqueduct (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Comparison of Caperea sp. with extant C. marginata.

Figure 5

(A) Caperea marginata (NMV C28531) and (B) Caperea sp. (NMV P233333), both in dorsal view. Photo credit: Felix G. Marx.

The open facial sulcus and constricted base of the anterior process are unique to Caperea, and strongly suggest referral of NMV P23333 to this genus. The new specimen differs from C. marginata, however, in having a markedly wider crista transversa, a larger pyramidal process, a larger stylomastoid fossa, and a more robust neck of anterior process. The combination of these features may suggest the existence of a separate, more archaic species of Caperea, but the fragmentary nature of the specimen prevents us from drawing firmer conclusions. Notably, a similarly robust pyramidal process also occurs in several cetotheriids, including Kurdalagonus, Mithridatocetus, and Herpetocetus.

A tympanal recess of the cochlea is typical of Caperea and most other plicogulans, but not balaenids and more archaic mysticetes, such as eomysticetids (Park et al., 2017b). Two and a half turns give the cochlea a more archaic aspect than that of C. marginata, and are broadly in line with the number of turns in most other mysticetes (Ekdale, 2016; Ritsche et al., 2018). The height and volume of the cochlea are larger than in most mysticetes, but similar to that of C. marginata. The axial pitch is also most similar to Caperea, whereas the cochlear slope value is higher than in all other mysticetes (Ekdale, 2016; Park et al., 2017a; Park et al., 2017b), and more similar to that of Zygorhiza or even some odontocetes (Park, Fitzgerald & Evans, 2016).

Origins of Caperea

Extant Caperea is restricted to the Southern Hemisphere, which, until recently, had also been the sole source of neobalaenine fossils (Bisconti, 2012; Buono et al., 2014; Fitzgerald, 2012). The recent description of two Pleistocene Caperea-like fossils from Italy and Japan provided the first evidence that pygmy right whales once crossed the equator, likely during brief glacial intervals associated with Northern Hemisphere glaciation (Tsai et al., 2017).

The idea that neobalaenines originated in the Southern Hemisphere and only briefly ventured north is plausible, but so far has remained difficult to test in light of the sparse fossil record. Thus, until now, the two northern occurrences of Caperea constituted the majority of the confidently identified neobalaenine record, contrasted only by Miocaperea pulchra from the Late Miocene of Peru. Our new specimen firms up the ancient southern history of the Caperea lineage, and suggests that neobalaenines may indeed have originated in austral seas (Fig. 6).

Figure 6. Global occurrence and age of neobalaenine fossils.

Figure 6

(A) Map illustrating neobalaenine fossil localities, as well as the geographical distribution of extant Caperea marginata. (B) Simplified phylogeny showing the fossil record of the three major lineages of extant baleen whales. For neobalaenines, dark green and red denote Southern and Northern Hemisphere occurrences, respectively. Grey illustrates the total cetotheriid fossil record. The age of NMV P233333 is marked with an asterisk. (A) modified from Tsai et al. (2017), (B) from Fitzgerald (2012) and Buono et al. (2014), under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Drawings of extant whales by Carl Buell. L., Late; Pleist., Pleistocene; Plio., Pliocene; Qu., Quaternary.

Additionally, our identification of an unambiguous neobalaenine periotic from the Sandringham Sandstone at Beaumaris corroborates Fitzgerald’s (2012) account of an isolated, putatively neobalaenine compound posterior process from the same unit and locality. Unlike our new material, the specimen described by Fitzgerald (2012) is notably larger than adult C. marginata, raising the possibility that it represents a distinct taxon. On the other hand, the posterior process of mysticetes dramatically increases in both absolute and relative size during ontogeny (Bisconti, 2001), making it plausible that the two Beaumaris specimens may be congeneric or even conspecific.

Historically, Miocene and Pliocene assemblages from the Northern Hemisphere have been investigated more intensively than those from the south (Boessenecker, 2013; Brandt, 1873; Gol’din & Startsev, 2016; Gottfried, Bohaska & Whitmore, 1994; Hampe & Ritsche, 2011; Kohno, Koike & Narita, 2007; Oishi & Hasegawa, 1995a; Steeman, 2010; Van Beneden, 1882; Van Beneden, 1886; Whitmore Jr & Kaltenbach, 2008), presumably because of the greater number of local researchers. Yet, despite these efforts, northern neobalaenines have remained elusive, including from the highly fossiliferous assemblages of Belgium (Steeman, 2010), northern Italy (Bisconti, 2009), Japan (Oishi & Hasegawa, 1995a; Oishi & Hasegawa, 1995b), and both the eastern and western coasts of the United States (Boessenecker, 2013; Gottfried, Bohaska & Whitmore, 1994; Whitmore Jr & Kaltenbach, 2008). By contrast, comparatively limited work in the Southern Hemisphere has yielded specimens from Australia (Fitzgerald, 2012; this study), Peru (Bisconti, 2012) and, possibly, Argentina (Buono et al., 2014), ranging in age from 10–5 Ma.

Given this marked discrepancy, we suggest that the absence of Caperea in the Northern Hemisphere during the Miocene and Pliocene is a genuine phenomenon. Fossil neobalaenines remain rare in the north since they mostly, or perhaps exclusively, occurred there during the Pleistocene (Tsai et al., 2017). Sea levels at that time were markedly lower than today (Miller et al., 2005), leading to coeval marine deposits becoming eroded and/or inundated whenever the ice retreated. In the south, the rarity of neobalaenine fossils may reflect genuine biological scarcity or habitat restriction, but likely also a simple lack of research effort. We predict that, as more Miocene and Pliocene assemblages are studied, neobalaenines will continue to emerge primarily from southern field sites and collections.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. 3D model of the external surface of NMV P233333.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5025/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. 3D model of the inner ear of Caperea sp. (NMV P233333).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5025/supp-2

Acknowledgments

We thank David P. Hocking for assistance with scanning, Tim Ziegler for access to specimens, Carl Buell for providing illustrations of extant whales, and Cheng-Hsiu Tsai, Robert W. Boessenecker and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments.

Institutional abbreviations

NMV

Museums Victoria, Melbourne

Funding Statement

This research was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Global Postdoctoral fellowship (656010/ MYSTICETI) to Felix G. Marx, and a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship (748167/ECHO) to Travis Park. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Felix G. Marx conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Travis Park performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Erich M.G. Fitzgerald conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Alistair R. Evans performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This article focuses on the description of a new fossil, accessioned as specimen number P233333, at Museums Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

References

  • Beddard (1901).Beddard FE. Contribution towards a knowledge of the osteology of the pigmy whale (Neobalaena marginata) Transactions of the Zoological Society of London. 1901;16:87–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Bisconti (2001).Bisconti M. Morphology and postnatal growth trajectory of rorqual petrosal. Italian Journal of Zoology. 2001;68:87–93. doi: 10.1080/11250000109356390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bisconti (2009).Bisconti M. Taxonomy and evolution of the Italian Pliocene Mysticeti (Mammalia, Cetacea): a state of the art. Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana. 2009;48:147–156. [Google Scholar]
  • Bisconti (2012).Bisconti M. Comparative osteology and phylogenetic relationships of Miocaperea pulchra, the first fossil pygmy right whale genus and species (Cetacea, Mysticeti, Neobalaenidae) Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2012;166:876–911. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00862.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Bisconti (2015).Bisconti M. Anatomy of a new cetotheriid genus and species from the Miocene of Herentals, Belgium, and the phylogenetic and palaeobiogeographical relationships of Cetotheriidae s.s. (Mammalia, Cetacea, Mysticeti) Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2015;13:377–395. doi: 10.1080/14772019.2014.890136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Boessenecker (2013).Boessenecker RW. A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the late neogene purisima formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans. Geodiversitas. 2013;35:815–940. doi: 10.5252/g2013n4a5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Boessenecker & Fordyce (2015).Boessenecker RW, Fordyce RE. A new genus and species of eomysticetid (Cetacea: Mysticeti) and a reinterpretation of ‘Mauicetus’ lophocephalus Marples, 1956: transitional baleen whales from the upper Oligocene of New Zealand. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2015;175:607–660. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandt (1872).Brandt JF. Über eine neue classification der Bartenwale (Balaenoidea) mit berücksichtigung der untergegangenen Gattungen derselben. Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de Saint Pétersbourg. 1872;17:113–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandt (1873).Brandt JF. Untersuchungen über die fossilen und subfossilen Cetaceen Europa’s. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St-Pétersbourg. 1873;20:1–371. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.39524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Brisson (1762).Brisson MJ. Regnum animale in classes IX distributum, sive synopsis methodica sistens generalem animalium distributionem in classes IX, & duarum primarum classium, quadripedum scilicet & cetaceorum, particularum divisionem in ordines, sectiones, genera, & species. 2 edition. Theodorum Haak, Lugduni Batavorum; Leiden: 1762. [Google Scholar]
  • Buchholtz (2011).Buchholtz EA. Vertebral and rib anatomy in Caperea marginata: implications for evolutionary patterning of the mammalian vertebral column. Marine Mammal Science. 2011;27:382–397. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2010.00411.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Buono et al. (2014).Buono MR, Dozo MT, Marx FG, Fordyce RE. A late miocene potential neobalaenine mandible from Argentina sheds light on the origins of the living pygmy right whale. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 2014;59:787–793. doi: 10.4202/app.2012.0122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Dickinson & Wallace (2009).Dickinson JA, Wallace MW. Phosphate-rich deposits associated with the Mio-Pliocene unconformity in south-east Australia. Sedimentology. 2009;56:547–565. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00985.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ekdale (2016).Ekdale EG. Morphological variation among the inner ears of extinct and extant baleen whales (Cetacea: Mysticeti) Journal of Morphology. 2016;277:1599–1615. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ekdale, Berta & Demere (2011).Ekdale EG, Berta A, Demere TA. The comparative osteology of the petrotympanic complex (ear region) of extant baleen whales (Cetacea: Mysticeti) PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e21311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • El Adli, Deméré & Boessenecker (2014).El Adli JJ, Deméré TA, Boessenecker RW. Herpetocetus morrowi (Cetacea: Mysticeti), a new species of diminutive baleen whale from the Upper Pliocene (Piacenzian) of California, USA, with observations on the evolution and relationships of the Cetotheriidae. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2014;170:400–466. doi: 10.1111/zoj.12108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzgerald (2012).Fitzgerald EMG. Possible neobalaenid from the Miocene of Australia implies a long evolutionary history for the pygmy right whale Caperea marginata (Cetacea, Mysticeti) Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2012;32:976–980. doi: 10.1080/02724634.2012.669803. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzgerald & Kool (2015).Fitzgerald EMG, Kool L. The first fossil sea turtles (Testudines: Cheloniidae) from the Cenozoic of Australia. Alcheringa: an Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 2015;39:142–148. doi: 10.1080/03115518.2015.964047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Fordyce & Marx (2013).Fordyce RE, Marx FG. The pygmy right whale Caperea marginata: the last of the cetotheres. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2013;280:20122645. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gol’din & Startsev (2016).Gol’din P, Startsev D. A systematic review of cetothere baleen whales (Cetacea, Cetotheriidae) from the Late Miocene of Crimea and Caucasus, with a new genus. Papers in Palaeontology. 2016;3:49–68. doi: 10.1002/spp2.1066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gol’din & Steeman (2015).Gol’din P, Steeman ME. From problem taxa to problem solver: a new Miocene family, Tranatocetidae, brings perspective on baleen whale evolution. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0135500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gottfried, Bohaska & Whitmore (1994).Gottfried MD, Bohaska DJ, Whitmore FC. Miocene cetaceans of the Chesapeake group. Proceedings of the San Diego Society of Natural History. 1994;29:229–238. [Google Scholar]
  • Gray (1846).Gray JE. On the cetaceous animals. In: Richardson J, Gray JE, editors. The zoology of the voyage of H M S Erebus and Terror under the command of Captain Sir James Clark Ross, R N, F R S, during the years 1839 to 1843 Volume 1 Mammalia, Birds. EW Janson; London: 1846. pp. 13–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Gray (1864).Gray JE. XXXVIII. Notes on the whalebone-whales; with a synopsis of the species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 1864;14:345–353. doi: 10.1080/00222936408681724. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Gray (1873).Gray JE. Remarks on some of the species in the foregoing paper (in: Notes on the whales and dolphins of the New-Zealand seas. With remarks by Dr. J. E. Gray F. R. S. &c.) Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 1873;11:107–112. [Google Scholar]
  • Hampe & Ritsche (2011).Hampe O, Ritsche I. Die Bartenwalfauna (Cetacea: Mysticeti: Balaenomorpha) aus dem Lüneburgium (Serravallium, Mittelmiozän) von Freetz bei Sittensen (Niedersachsen, Deutschland) Zeitschrift für Geologische Wissenschaften. 2011;39:83–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Ketten & Wartzok (1990).Ketten DR, Wartzok D. Three-dimensional reconstructions of the dolphin ear. NATO ASI (Advanced Science Institutes) Series Series a Life Sciences. 1990;196:81–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Kohno, Koike & Narita (2007).Kohno N, Koike H, Narita K. Outline of fossil marine mammals from the middle Miocene Bessho and Aoki Formations, Nagano Prefecture, Japan. Research Report of the Shinshushinmachi Fossil Museum. 2007;10:1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • Marx & Fordyce (2016).Marx FG, Fordyce RE. A link no longer missing: new evidence for the cetotheriid affinities of Caperea. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0164059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGowen, Spaulding & Gatesy (2009).McGowen MR, Spaulding M, Gatesy J. Divergence date estimation and a comprehensive molecular tree of extant cetaceans. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2009;53:891–906. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mead & Fordyce (2009).Mead JG, Fordyce RE. The therian skull: a lexicon with emphasis on the odontocetes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology. 2009;627:1–248. [Google Scholar]
  • Meredith et al. (2013).Meredith RW, Gatesy J, Emerling CA, York VM, Springer MS. Rod monochromacy and the coevolution of cetacean retinal opsins. PLOS Genetics. 2013;9:e1003432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Miller et al. (2005).Miller KG, Kominz MA, Browning JV, Wright JD, Mountain GS, Katz ME, Sugarman PJ, Cramer BS, Christie-Blick N, Pekar SF. The Phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Science. 2005;310:1293–1298. doi: 10.1126/science.1116412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Montelli et al. (2016).Montelli S, Peruffo A, Patarnello T, Cozzi B, Negrisolo E. Back to water: signature of adaptive evolution in cetacean mitochondrial tRNAs. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0158129. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oishi & Hasegawa (1995a).Oishi M, Hasegawa Y. A list of fossil cetaceans in Japan. Island Arc. 1995a;3:493–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00128.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Oishi & Hasegawa (1995b).Oishi M, Hasegawa Y. Diversity of Pliocene mysticetes from eastern Japan. Island Arc. 1995b;3:436–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1738.1994.tb00124.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Park et al. (2017a).Park T, Evans AR, Gallagher SJ, Fitzgerald EMG. Low-frequency hearing preceded the evolution of giant body size and filter feeding in baleen whales. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 2017a;284:20162528. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park, Fitzgerald & Evans (2016).Park T, Fitzgerald EMG, Evans AR. Ultrasonic hearing and echolocation in the earliest toothed whales. Biology Letters. 2016;12:20160060. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park et al. (2017b).Park T, Marx FG, Fitzgerald EMG, Evans AR. The cochlea of the enigmatic pygmy right whale Caperea marginata informs mysticete phylogeny. Journal of Morphology. 2017b;278:801–809. doi: 10.1002/jmor.20674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ritsche et al. (2018).Ritsche IS, Fahlke JM, Wieder F, Hilger A, Manke I, Hampe O. Relationships of cochlear coiling shape and hearing frequencies in cetaceans, and the occurrence of infrasonic hearing in Miocene Mysticeti. Fossil Record. 2018;21:33–45. doi: 10.5194/fr-21-33-2018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Steeman (2010).Steeman ME. The extinct baleen whale fauna from the Miocene-Pliocene of Belgium and the diagnostic cetacean ear bones. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2010;8:63–80. doi: 10.1080/14772011003594961. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Steeman et al. (2009).Steeman ME, Hebsgaard MB, Fordyce RE, Ho SYW, Rabosky DL, Nielsen R, Rahbek C, Glenner H, Sorensen MV, Willerslev E. Radiation of extant cetaceans driven by restructuring of the oceans. Systematic Biology. 2009;58:573–585. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syp060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsai et al. (2017).Tsai C-H, Collareta A, Fitzgerald EMG, Marx FG, Kohno N, Bosselaers M, Insacco G, Reitano A, Catanzariti R, Oishi M, Bianucci G. Northern pygmy right whales highlight Quaternary marine mammal interchange. Current Biology. 2017;27:R1058–R1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Beneden (1882).Van Beneden P-J. Description des ossements fossiles des environs d’Anvers. Troisième partie. Cétacés. Genres Megaptera, Balaenoptera, Burtinopsis et Erpetocetus. Annales du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique. 1882;7:1–87. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Beneden (1886).Van Beneden P-J. Description des ossements fossiles des environs d’Anvers. Cinquième partie. Cétacés. Genres Amphicetus, Heterocetus, Mesocetus, Idiocetus et Isocetus. Annales du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique. 1886;13:1–139. [Google Scholar]
  • VandenBerg (2016).VandenBerg AHM. Depositonal facies and extent of the late Neogene Sandringham Sandstone in southern Victoria, Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 2016;128:7–24. doi: 10.1071/RS16009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Whitmore Jr & Kaltenbach (2008).Whitmore Jr FC, Kaltenbach JA. Neogene Cetacea of the Lee Creek Phosphate Mine, North Carolina. Virginia Museum of Natural History Special Publication. 2008;14:181–269. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. 3D model of the external surface of NMV P233333.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5025/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. 3D model of the inner ear of Caperea sp. (NMV P233333).
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5025/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

This article focuses on the description of a new fossil, accessioned as specimen number P233333, at Museums Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES