Abstract
Clustered protocadherins (Pcdhs) are neuronal cell adhesion molecules characterized by homophilic adhesion between the tetramers of 58 distinct isoforms in mice. The diversity of Pcdhs and resulting highly-specific neuronal adhesion may be required for the formation of neural circuits for executing higher brain functions. However, this hypothesis remains to be tested, because knockout of Pcdh genes produces abnormalities that may interfere with higher brain functions indirectly. In Pcdh-α1,12 mice, only α1, α12 and two constitutive isoforms are expressed out of 14 isoforms. The appearance and behavior of Pcdh-α1,12 mice are similar to those of wild-type mice, and most abnormalities reported in Pcdh-α knockout mice are not present in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. We examined Pcdh-α1,12 mice in detail, and found that cortical depression induced by sensory mismatches between vision and whisker sensation in the visual cortex was impaired. Since Pcdh-α is densely distributed over the cerebral cortex, various types of higher function are likely impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. As expected, visual short-term memory of space/shape was impaired in behavioral experiments using space/shape cues. Furthermore, behavioral learning based on audio-visual associative memory was also impaired. These results indicate that the molecular diversity of Pcdh-α plays essential roles for sensory integration and short-term memory.
Introduction
Mouse models are powerful tools for investigating mental disorders1, some of which are likely attributed to abnormalities in complex neural circuits required for executing higher brain functions. Clustered protocadherins (Pcdhs) are neuronal cell adhesion molecules with 58 distinct isoforms coded by Pcdh-α, -β and -γ gene clusters in mice2,3. A few isoforms in each gene cluster are randomly selected by stochastic expression at the individual neuron level, and the resulting diversity in Pcdhs is expected to play an important role in the formation of complex neural circuits4–6, which possibly execute higher brain functions. However, this possibility is difficult to test. Mice lacking Pcdh-γ are born alive, though they die within 12 h after birth7. The loss of Pcdh-α or -β results in several non-lethal abnormalities8–13, which may interfere with higher brain functions indirectly.
The roles of Pcdh diversity in higher brain functions may be elucidated by investigating genetically-manipulated mice, in which the diversity of Pcdhs is reduced yet no apparent abnormality is found. Pcdh-α1,12 mice express only α1 and α12 out of the variable α1–12 isoforms, along with an intact expression of constitutive Pcdh-α isoforms14–16. In Pcdh-α1,12 mice, α1 and α12 increase in a compensatory manner; thus, the total amount of Pcdh-α remains constant16. The appearance and behavior of Pcdh-α1,12 mice are similar to those of wild-type mice, and most abnormalities found in Pcdh-α knockout mice are not present in Pcdh-α1,12 mice, except for a particular type of cortical plasticity dependent on multimodal sensory integration12. We further investigated Pcdh-α1,12 mice in detail and found that two types of higher functions based on multimodal sensory integration and two types of visual short-term memory were impaired. These findings clearly indicate that diversity of Pcdh-α is required for executing higher cognitive functions including short-term memory and sensory integration, possibly because highly specific homophilic interactions between the tetramers of Pcdhs are required for specificity in Pcdh-dependent circuit formation together with growth of a properly complex dendrite arbor17.
Results
Visual-whisker integration
The appearance and behavior of Pcdh-α1,12 mice were similar to those of wild-type mice (Video 1). We investigated cortical depression in the primary visual cortex (V1) induced by spatial mismatches between vision and whisker sensation, since this depression is impaired in Pcdh-α knockout mice12. To produce multimodal sensory mismatches, a small monocular prism goggle was attached in front of the left eye (Fig. 1a). After the goggle was removed, visual responses were recorded. When light stimuli were placed in front of the left eye, cortical responses were observed in the contralateral binocular region of the V1 (cV1B) and the ipsilateral binocular region of the V1 (iV1B) (Fig. 1b, left upper panel). The cortical responses in the monocular region of the V1 (V1M) were elicited by light stimuli placed on the left side of the mouse (Fig. 1b, left lower panel). These responses elicited via the left prism eye were weaker than the corresponding responses elicited via the right naive eye (Fig. 1b, right panels). The amplitudes of the cortical responses elicited via the left prism eye were significantly depressed compared to those elicited via the right naive eye in the cV1B, iV1B, and V1M (Fig. 1c). These results indicate that prism-induced depression was present in the V1M as well as in the V1B12. We performed similar experiments in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. However, no clear depression was observed in the V1M and V1B (Fig. 1d,e). In contrast, ocular dominance plasticity was observed after monocular deprivation in Pcdh-α1,12 (Fig. 1f,g), as in wild-type mice18. Single neuronal activities in the V1 were recorded using two-photon Ca2+ imaging. However, we found no apparent difference in orientation/direction selectivity of V1 neurons between wild-type and Pcdh-α1,12 mice (Fig. S1).
Visual short-term memory of spatial information
Spatial information obtained from vision and whisker sensation is thought to be integrated in the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) for detecting multimodal sensory mismatch12. The PPC is reported to play additional roles in terms of visual short-term memory for spatial information19. Therefore, visual short-term memory may also be impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. We tested this possibility using a T-maze test (Fig. 2a). First, mice were trained with a visually guided task as a control. Wild-type mice learned to choose the correct branches marked with a visual cue to receive a reward. The task performance reached a plateau level within 20 days/sessions (Fig. 2b). The performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice in the visually guided task was similar to that of wild-type mice (Fig. 2c,e). After the performance in the visually guided task reached a plateau level, we moved the position of the visual cue to the left or right wall of the T-maze near the starting point. Under this condition, short-term memory of the right or left cue position was required for the successful choice of rewarded branches (Fig. 2a). The performance of wild-type mice in this memory-guided task was suppressed immediately after task switching down to chance level, and then gradually recovered up to the performance level before task switching (Fig. 2b,d). The performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice was also suppressed immediately after task switching; however, the suppression was mild compared to that in wild-type mice. The performance level did not recover afterwards (Fig. 2c,d), and the final performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice (n = 5) was significantly worse than that of wild-type mice (n = 5, P < 0.01, Fig. 2e). Interestingly, Pcdh-α1,12 mice reached the goal area faster than wild-type mice in the visually guided task and the memory-guided task (Fig. 2f), suggesting that Pcdh-α1,12 mice spent less time in the decision-making.
Visual short-term memory of shape information
In primates, higher visual areas are divided into a dorsal pathway specialized in motion/spatial information processing and a ventral pathway specialized in pattern/shape information processing20. Mice have visual areas surrounding the V1, and these higher areas are considered to be homologous to those of primates21–23. The wide distribution of Pcdh-α throughout the cerebral cortex16 suggests that short-term memory of pattern/shape information can also be affected in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. To test this possibility, we constructed an M-shaped maze to investigate short-term memory of shape information (Fig. 3a,b). First, mice were trained with a visually guided task as a control. Wild-type mice learned to choose the correct branches marked with the choice shapes that differed from those in sample images (non-matching-to-sample test, Fig. 3b). The performance in this test reached plateau level after 20 days/sessions of training (Fig. 3c,e). Next, we introduced a delay period of 20 s between the presentation of the sample and choice images (Fig. 3b). The performance of wild-type mice in this memory-guided task was suppressed immediately after task switching, and gradually recovered up to the performance level before task switching (Fig. 3c,e). Similarly, wild-type mice could perform a delayed matching-to-sample test, and finally they could discriminate even between a pair of alphabets (Fig. S2). The performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice in the visually guided task was similar to that of wild-type mice (Fig. 3d,e), and no significant difference was observed in the performance level between wild-type and Pcdh-α1,12 mice (Fig. 3f). The performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice was also suppressed immediately after task switching, although no clear performance recovery was observed afterward (Fig. 3d,e). The final performance level of Pcdh-α1,12 mice (n = 8) with a delay of 20 s was better than chance level (P < 0.05) in the last five sessions (100 trials), although significantly worse than that of wild-type mice (n = 8, P < 0.003, Fig. 3f). Taken together with the results shown in Fig. 2, it is indicated that visual short-term memory is impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice.
Audio-visual integration
From the results shown in Fig. 1, we speculated that various types of multimodal sensory integration may be impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Fortunately, the M-shaped maze was appropriate to investigate associative memory that depends on Audio-visual integration. First, mice were trained with a visually guided task using a sample-to-match test with no delay. During this phase, the presentation of each sample shape was combined with the presentation of a specific sound cue in a one-to-one manner (Fig. 4a, Video 2). The performance of wild-type mice and Pcdh-α1,12 mice reached a plateau level within 20–30 days/sessions in this test (Fig. 4b–d), and no significant difference was found in the performance level between the two groups of mice (Fig. 4e). In the next stage, mice had to choose the correct shapes based on associative memory between shapes and the corresponding sound cues (Video 3). The performance of wild-type mice was transiently suppressed immediately after task switching, and then gradually recovered up to the performance level before task switching (Fig. 4b,d). Similarly the performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice was suppressed, yet almost no recovery was observed afterward (Fig. 4c,d). The final performance level of Pcdh-α1,12 mice (n = 8) in the associative memory-guided task was better than chance level (P < 0.05) in the last five sessions (100 trials), although significantly worse than that of wild-type mice (n = 8, P < 0.001, Fig. 4e).
Discussion
In the present study, we found four types of abnormal phenotypes related to higher cognitive functions in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. In behavioral experiments analyzing visual short-term memory, we investigated visually guided tasks first. The performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice was similar to that of wild-type mice. Moreover, ocular dominance plasticity, orientation selectivity, and direction selectivity of V1 neurons were normal in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. These results indicate that visual functions and learning abilities are not impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Second, we tested the memory-guided tasks, in which the performance of Pcdh-α1,12 mice was inferior to that of wild-type mice. These results indicate that visual short-term memory is impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. The suppression of mismatch-induced cortical plasticity and the poor behavioral performance based on Audio-visual associative memory suggest that multimodal sensory integration is also impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Considering the extensive distribution of Pcdh-α in most cortical neurons16, a wide variety of higher cognitive functions can be related to Pcdh-α. Pcdh-α1,12 mice seemed to be more determined in decision-making compared to wild-type mice, since Pcdh-α1,12 mice spent less time to reach the correct goals in the T-maze test. In the memory-guided tasks, Pcdh-α1,12 mice quickly reached the final performance level, which was low yet significantly better than chance level. In contrast, the final performance level was achieved only 5–15 days/sessions after task switching in wild-type mice. This difference might be explained by impairment of cognitive flexibility in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Cognitive flexibility is usually required for reversal learning24,25 and is controlled by serotonergic neurons26. The present behavioral tests did not include reversal learning. In Pcdh-α knockout mice, abnormal distribution of serotonergic fibers is found10, and this phenotype is attributed to loss of αc2, a constitutively-expressed Pcdh-α isoform in serotonergic neurons27. Therefore, it is possible that the abnormalities in Pcdh-α knockout mice may be derived from a reduced diversity of Pcdh-α, or a loss of constitutive isoforms such as αc1 and αc2. Since constitutive Pcdh-α isoforms are intact in Pcdh-α1,12 mice16, it is suggested that the four phenotypes were derived from the reduced diversity of Pcdh-α.
Short-term memory is maintained by persistent neural firing for more than a few seconds after the offset of stimuli28–31. Various mechanisms underlying persistent firing have been proposed including roles for intrinsic neuronal properties32–35, short-term synaptic potentiation36–38, and specialized neural circuits39,40. Possibly, short-term memory may require a combination of these mechanism30,31. The present results can provide insight into the neural mechanisms of short-term memory by highlighting the possible roles of Pcdhs. The molecular diversity of Pcdhs plays a role in self-avoidance in dendritic synapse formation4,41. In the synapses between different neurons, the molecular diversity of Pcdhs is considered necessary for specific circuit formation5,6. This suggests that the specificity of Pcdh-dependent synaptic formation deteriorates as the molecular diversity of Pcdh-α decreases, and that the formation of specialized neural circuits required for short-term memory may be impaired in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. In addition, synaptic mechanisms for short-term memory require sparse readout circuits that convert synaptic potentiation to neural activities with minimal dissipation of information36–38, and such sparseness of readout circuits may be deteriorated in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Assuming that two neuronal layers are sparsely connected in a one-to-one fashion, localized input to the first layer produces short-term potentiation (STP) in the stimulated synapses (Fig. S4). The information stored as STP can be converted to short-term memory by adding diffuse input to the first layer. However, the content in short-term memory is obscured in Pcdh-α1,12 mice. Taken together, the present results suggest that accurate and sparse synaptic formation controlled by the molecular diversity of Pcdh-α plays an important role in the neural mechanisms underlying short-term memory.
The neural mechanisms underlying the integration of information are largely unknown. The impairment of short-term memory and sensory integration in Pcdh-α1,12 mice suggests that a common neural mechanism may exist for both functions. NMDA receptors can induce both long-term potentiation and STP42,43 and play an essential role in short-term memory32, as well as in associative learning44. Therefore, NMDA receptor-dependent STP can serve as a common mechanism for short-term memory and associative learning. Hebb proposed that formation of a functionally connected dynamic cell assembly of neurons representing each aspect of information may explain how information is integrated as a whole45, while it is unknown how such dynamic cell assemblies are stably present in the brain. Neural firing representing short-term memory is not necessarily continuous38, and sequential activities of multiple neurons have been observed during the maintenance of short-term memory19, suggesting a transfer of contents between short-term memory circuits. When short-term memory circuits storing each aspect of information are connected with content transfers, a stable form of dynamic cell assembly can be formed. NMDA receptor-dependent potentiation works as spike-timing dependent plasticity46, in which synchronized bursting activities underlying short-term memory47 can be integrated. Therefore, assuming the involvement of NMDA receptors, short-term memory circuits may also play a role in the integration of information. Although these mechanisms remain to be confirmed, the present results indicate the importance of Pcdh-dependent neural circuit formation for sensory integration. A wide variety of higher cognitive functions can be related to Pcdh-α, as has been reported in humans48,49. Possibly, even higher mental functions such as consciousness could also be dependent on the diversity of Pcdhs, since short-term memory and integration of information are essential components of consciousness50.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval and animals
The ethics committee of Niigata University approved the experimental protocols used in this study (approval numbers: 372-7 and SA00143). All experiments were performed in accordance with approved guidelines and regulations. C57BL/6 mice and Pcdh-α1,12 mice16 of both sexes were used.
Endogenous fluorescence imaging of cortical activities
Activity-dependent changes in endogenous fluorescence derived from mitochondrial flavoproteins51 were used for imaging cortical activities in the V1, because this imaging technique requires no exogenous fluorophore and has been proven appropriate for examining cortical plasticity in mice12,18. Mice were anesthetized with urethane (1.6 g/kg, i.p.). Throughout recordings, rectal temperature was maintained at 38 °C using a silicon rubber heater. Surgical procedures were conducted under sterile conditions. After subcutaneous injection of bupivacaine (AstraZeneca, Osaka, Japan), the disinfected skin was incised, and the skull covering the imaged area was exposed. The surface of the intact skull was covered with a mixture of liquid paraffin and Vaseline to prevent drying and to keep the skull transparent. The head was fixed using a stereotaxic frame (SG-4, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan). Surgical procedures usually completed within 20 min. Imaging was conducted approximately 60 min after administration of urethane. An additional dose of urethane (0.2 g/kg, S.C.) was administered when necessary. At the end of the imaging experiments, the mice were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital (i.p.).
Cortical images (128 × 168 pixels after binning) were recorded at nine frames/s using a cooled CCD camera system (Aquacosmos system with an ORCA-ER camera, Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). The camera was attached to a binocular epifluorescence microscope with a 75 W xenon light source (MZ FL III, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Fluorescence images (λ: 500–550 nm) excited by blue light (λ: 450–490 nm) were acquired while the mice were administered visual stimuli in trials repeated at 20 s intervals. Images were averaged over 24–40 trials. Spatial moving averaging in 5 × 5 pixel areas was also used. Images were normalized, pixel by pixel, with respect to a reference image, which was obtained by averaging five images obtained immediately before stimulation. The normalized images are shown with a pseudocolour scale representing relative fluorescence changes (ΔF/F0). The response amplitude at 0.6–1.0 s after stimulus onset was evaluated as values of ΔF/F0 in a square window of 10 × 10 pixels. The location of the window was adjusted so that the response amplitude in ΔF/F0 was maximal.
Sensory stimulation
During the recording of V1 responses, the stimulated eyes were opened until the entire pupil was exposed. The corneas were repeatedly covered with saline throughout the experiments to prevent drying. As a visual stimulus for evaluating V1 responses, we used a red LED (λ, 613 nm; diameter, 3 mm; TLSH160, Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) placed 30 cm away from the mouse in the horizontal plane. The LED was turned on for 1 s in each trial, and only on-responses were examined. One of the two eyes was covered to enable stimulation only of the uncovered eye. LED stimuli were presented directly in front of the subject (0°) to elicit responses in the cV1B and iV1B, and on the left/right side (90°) to elicit responses in the V1M. For evaluating the properties of V1 neurons using two photon imaging, moving grating patterns were produced with a visual stimulus generator (ViSaGe, Cambridge Research System, Cheshire, UK), and presented on an 8-inch display (LCD-8000, Century, Tokyo, Japan) placed 11.5 cm away from the mice at an angle of 60° to the left. The properties of the grating patterns were as followings: 0.05 cycle/°, square wave red/black contrast, speed at 20°/s, eight directions from −45° to 270° in 45° steps, duration of 2 s. To avoid perturbation of fluorescence measurements using blue and green lights, the surface of the monitor was covered with a filter passing red light with λ > 600 nm (Sharp Cut Filter, Kenko, Tokyo Japan). For investigating Audio-visual integration, an auditory stimulus mimicking the sound of a cat’s meow was obtained from a free online source (http://taira-komori.jpn.org/index.html). We also used a sound mimicking a mouse squeak (http://on-jin.com/sound/ani.php). The peak intensity of these sound stimuli was adjusted to approximately 70 dB sound pressure level.
Induction of cortical plasticity in V1
The surgical procedures required for producing cortical plasticity in V1 were conducted, as described previously12,18. Wild-type mice and Pcdh-α1,12 mice at 4 weeks old were anesthetized with pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.). Fradiomycin and ampicillin were used to protect against infection. A clear acryl prism goggle weighing 0.6 g was attached to the skull with acrylic dental resin (Super Bond, Sun Medical, Shiga, Japan), so that the prism was located in front of the left eye. When ocular dominance plasticity was tested, the skin around the left eye was disinfected with 70% alcohol. Eyelids were sutured with a fine surgical nylon thread (diameter: 0.23 mm, Mani Inc., Tochigi, Japan). During monocular deprivation, mice were examined daily to ensure that the eyes remained closed and uninfected. An ophthalmic solution containing levofloxacin (5 mg/ml, Santen Pharmaceutical, Osaka, Japan) was applied to the sutured eye every day. Cortical plasticity was assessed 4–7 days after the surgical manipulation.
Behavioral experiments
For testing short-term memory of visual spatial information, a T-maze was constructed with pieces of black plastic plate (Fig. 2a). The width, length, and height of the maze were 30 cm, 100 cm, and 10 cm, respectively. The width of the passage was 5 cm. As a visual cue, a white plastic plate (5 cm width × 10 cm height) was attached at the branching point in the visually guided task or at 10 cm from the starting point of the maze in the memory-guided task. The training and tests began when mice were 5–6 weeks old, and continued for up to 3 months. As a reward, a 50 μl drop of 5% glucose solution, on a plastic weighing dish placed at the end of the correct branch, was provided for each correct trial. In case of an error trial, mice repeated the trial until they selected the correct branch. When mice did not select any branch within 4 min after they were placed at the starting point of the maze, the trial was aborted. Each mouse underwent 20 trials per day. Therefore, each mouse consumed 1 ml of 5% glucose solution in each session. To maintain motivation for the reward, mice were reared under a scheme of intermittent water deprivation. In this scheme, the first session of the T-maze test was started 2 days after the initiation of water deprivation. Mice were trained for a maximum of 5 successive days before water deprivation was stopped. During the training in this scheme, dry food pellets were freely available. The body weight of the mice was maintained at approximately 85% of the weight before water deprivation, and normal body growth was observed throughout the intermittent water deprivation period (Fig. S2e).
For testing short-term memory of visual shape information, an M-shaped maze was constructed with pieces of black plastic plate (Fig. 3a). The width, length, and height of the maze were 32 cm, 21 cm and 10 cm, respectively. The upper boundary of the maze was closed with a tablet PC with a 10.1-inch display (PadTF700T, ASUS, Taipei, Taiwan) for visual stimulation. The central area of the maze was divided into two parts with a transparent plastic panel (Fig. 3a). The part distant from the display was used as a waiting area, where mice saw the display of the tablet PC. The transparent panel was removed by experimenters at the appropriate time, and mice selected one of the two branches connected to the part near the display. The two branches were maintained dark with a black plastic cover to facilitate choice by mice. In error trials, mice repeated the trial until they selected the correct branches. When mice did not select any branch within 20 s after the transparent panel was removed, the trial was aborted. Each mouse was tested in 20 trials per day. Therefore, each mouse consumed 1 ml of 5% glucose solution in each session. An intermittent water deprivation scheme was also used in this experiment. Visual stimuli were prepared using PowerPoint (Microsoft) and stored as videos for use on the tablet PC. In the visually guided task, a sample image of a circle or star (approximately 20° in diameter) was presented in the middle of the display for 10 s. The brightness of the sample images was modulated at 1 Hz using the animation function in PowerPoint. Immediately after presentation of the sample image, choice images of either a circle or a star were shown for 20 s at the entrance of each branch. In a matching-to-sample test, the branch marked with the same shape as the sample image was the correct choice. In a nonmatching-to-sample test, the branch marked with a different shape from the sample image was the correct choice. Mice were successfully trained to perform both tests, while the percentage of the correct choices was slightly higher in the nonmatching-to-sample test. Selection of the sample and choice images was determined randomly.
The M-shaped maze was also used for testing sensory integration between vision and audition (Fig. 4). In the visually guided task, the presentation of sample images was accompanied by sound stimuli: a circle was coupled with a meow sound and a star was coupled with a squeak sound. The presentation of sound cues was synchronized at 1 Hz with changes in the brightness of the sample images using the animation function in PowerPoint (Video 2). The sound cues were presented through a small speaker (Companion 2, Bose, Framingham, USA). In the sound cue-guided task, presentation of the sample images was omitted and the mice selected the correct branches based on sound cues only (Video 3).
Sensory integration between vision and audition was also investigated using passive exposure to sample images combined with sound cues. After the visually guided task in the absence of sound cues was completed, the mice were returned to a home cage constructed from a transparent plastic plate and placed in a dark sound-proof box. The width, length, and height of the cage were 22 cm, 32 cm, and 18 cm, respectively. Each side of the cage was surrounded by four 8-inch displays, and a speaker was set on the cage. The sample images synchronized with the corresponding sound cues were presented through the four displays and a speaker for 10 s at 30 s intervals for 48 h. The two pairs of the combined Audio-visual stimuli (“circles” plus “meow”, and “stars” plus “squeak”) were alternately presented at 30 s intervals. The memory-guided task based on Audio-visual association was tested after passive exposure.
Two-photon imaging
Two-photon calcium imaging was performed using Cal-520 as a calcium indicator52. Cal-520 AM (AAT Bioquest, Sunnyvale, USA) at 8 mM was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide containing 20% (w/v) pluronic F-127 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA), and further diluted 10 times with saline containing 0.1 mM sulforhodamine 101 (SR-101, Invitrogen). A glass pipette (tip diameter: 2–4 µm) was pulled and filled with the Cal-520 AM solution. The skull covering the right V1 was removed. The pipette was slowly inserted into the V1 and advanced into the supragranular layers, 200–250 µm deep from the pial surface. The Cal-520 AM solution was injected with a pressure of 8–25 kPa for 5–10 min, so that the cells in the area 200–300 µm from the tip of the pipette were stained. Astrocytes stained with SR-101 were excluded from further analysis. After injection, the pipette was withdrawn and the hole opened by craniotomy was covered with 2% agarose and a thin cover glass (5 × 5 mm, thickness <0.15 mm). The cover glass was firmly fixed to the skull with dental resin. Calcium imaging was performed using a two-photon microscope (TCS SP5 MP, Leica Microsystems) with a Ti-Sapphire mode-locked femto-second laser (Chameleon Vision, Coherent, Santa Clara, USA). Images were obtained via a ×20 water immersion objective lens (numerical aperture 1.0, HCX PL APO, Leica Microsystems). The excitation wavelength for Cal-520 was 900 nm, while that for SR-101 was 940 nm. Observations were started 40–50 min after Cal-520 AM injection. Cal-520 fluorescence was observed between 500 and 550 nm. Circular windows with a diameter of 20 pixels (14.3 μm) were placed on neuronal cell bodies stained with Cal-520 but not with SR-101, and the obtained fluorescence signals in the windows were averaged across 10 trials. The normalized fluorescence changes in ΔF/F0 were calculated using the averaged baseline intensity (F0) collected immediately before stimulus onset.
Statistical analysis
Paired data obtained from the same mice were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Unpaired data obtained from different mice were evaluated using the Mann Whitney U-test. Values in the figures represent the mean and SEM in groups of mice, unless otherwise specified. The cumulative distribution of the orientation selectivity index or direction selectivity index in different neurons was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Deviation of behavioral performance from chance level (50%) was evaluated with the χ2-test in five successive sessions (100 trials).
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Maruyama, A. Matsushima & M. Isogai for technical assistance and H. Nawa & N. Nishio for reading the manuscript. This work was supported by AMED-CREST (K.Y., D.K., K.W., T.Y., K.S.), KAKENHI (JP15K16572 to K.Y., JP22115011 and JP16H01892 to K.S.).
Author Contributions
T.Y. and K.Y. performed experiments on sensory integration, and D.K. and K.W. performed experiments on short-term memory. H.T. performed 2-photon imaging. R.H., K.T. S.T., A.H. helped with experiments and data analyses. T.Y. provided Pcdh-α1,12 mice. K.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Tatsuya Yamagishi and Kohei Yoshitake contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-018-28034-4.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Leung C, Jia Z. Mouse genetic models of human brain disorders. Front. Genet. 2016;7:40. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2016.00040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kohmura N, et al. Diversity revealed by a novel family of cadherins expressed in neurons at a synaptic complex. Neuron. 1998;20:1137–1151. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80495-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Thu CA, et al. Single-cell identity generated by combinatorial homophilic interactions between α, β, and γ protocadherins. Cell. 2014;158:1045–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lefebvre JL, Kostadinov D, Chen WV, Maniatis T, Sanes JR. Protocadherins mediate dendritic self-avoidance in the mammalian nervous system. Nature. 2012;488:517–521. doi: 10.1038/nature11305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yagi T. Genetic basis of neuronal individuality in the mammalian brain. J. Neurogenet. 2013;27:97–105. doi: 10.3109/01677063.2013.801969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tarusawa E, et al. Establishment of high reciprocal connectivity between clonal cortical neurons is regulated by the Dnmt3b DNA methyltransferase and clustered protocadherins. BMC Biol. 2016;14:103. doi: 10.1186/s12915-016-0326-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang X, et al. Gamma protocadherins are required for survival of spinal interneurons. Neuron. 2002;36:843–854. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01090-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hasegawa S, et al. The protocadherin-alpha family is involved in axonal coalescence of olfactory sensory neurons into glomeruli of the olfactory bulb in mouse. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 2008;38:66–79. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hasegawa S, et al. Distinct and cooperative functions for the protocadherin-α, -β and -γ clusters in neuronal survival and axon targeting. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2016;6:155. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Katori S, et al. Protocadherin-alpha family is required for serotonergic projections to appropriately innervate target brain areas. J. Neurosci. 2009;29:9137–9147. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5478-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yamashita H, et al. Restoration of contralateral representation in the mouse somatosensory cortex after crossing nerve transfer. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yoshitake K, et al. Visual map shifts based on whisker-guided cues in the young mouse visual cortex. Cell Rep. 2013;5:1365–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meguro R, et al. Impaired clustered protocadherin-α leads to aggregated retinogeniculate terminals and impaired visual acuity in mice. J. Neurochem. 2015;133:66–72. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Esumi S, et al. Monoallelic yet combinatorial expression of variable exons of the protocadherin-alpha gene cluster in single neurons. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:171–176. doi: 10.1038/ng1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kaneko R, et al. Allelic gene regulation of Pcdh-α and Pcdh-γ clusters involving both monoallelic and biallelic expression in single Purkinje cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:30551–30560. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M605677200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Noguchi Y, et al. Total expression and dual gene-regulatory mechanisms maintained in deletions and duplications of the Pcdhα cluster. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:32002–32014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.046938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Molumby MJ, Keeler AB, Weiner JA. Homophilic protocadherin cell-cell interactions promote dendrite complexity. Cell Rep. 2016;15:1037–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tohmi M, Kitaura H, Komagata S, Kudoh M, Shibuki K. Enduring critical period plasticity visualized by transcranial flavoprotein imaging in mouse primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:11775–11785. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1643-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Harvey CD, Coen P, Tank DW. Choice-specific sequences in parietal cortex during a virtual-navigation decision task. Nature. 2012;484:62–68. doi: 10.1038/nature10918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ungerleider LG, Courtney SM, Haxby JV. A neural system for human visual working memory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:883–890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Andermann ML, Kerlin AM, Roumis DK, Glickfeld LL, Reid RC. Functional specialization of mouse higher visual cortical areas. Neuron. 2011;72:1025–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marshel JH, Garrett ME, Nauhaus I, Callaway EM. Functional specialization of seven mouse visual cortical areas. Neuron. 2011;72:1040–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tohmi M, Meguro R, Tsukano H, Hishida R, Shibuki K. The extrageniculate visual pathway generates distinct response properties in the higher visual areas of mice. Curr. Biol. 2014;24:587–597. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.01.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hamilton DA, Brigman JL. Behavioral flexibility in rats and mice: contributions of distinct frontocortical regions. Genes Brain Behav. 2015;14:4–21. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Izquierdo A, Brigman JL, Radke AK, Rudebeck PH, Holmes A. The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective. Neuroscience. 2017;345:12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Matias S, Lottem E, Dugué GP, Mainen ZF. Activity patterns of serotonin neurons underlying cognitive flexibility. Elife. 2017;6:e20552. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen WV, et al. Pcdhαc2 is required for axonal tiling and assembly of serotonergic circuitries in mice. Science. 2017;356:406–411. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang XJ. Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:455–463. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01868-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brody CD, Romo R, Kepecs A. Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2003;13:204–211. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00050-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Major G, Tank D. Persistent neural activity: prevalence and mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004;14:675–684. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fisher D, Olasagasti I, Tank DW, Aksay ER, Goldman MS. A modeling framework for deriving the structural and functional architecture of a short-term memory microcircuit. Neuron. 2013;79:987–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lisman JE, Fellous JM, Wang XJ. A role for NMDA-receptor channels in working memory. Nat. Neurosci. 1998;1:273–275. doi: 10.1038/1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Egorov AV, Hamam BN, Fransén E, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA. Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons. Nature. 2002;420:173–178. doi: 10.1038/nature01171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koulakov AA, Raghavachari S, Kepecs A, Lisman JE. Model for a robust neural integrator. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5:775–782. doi: 10.1038/nn893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fall CP, Rinzel J. An intracellular Ca2+ subsystem as a biologically plausible source of intrinsic conditional bistability in a network model of working memory. J. Comput. Neurosci. 2006;20:97–107. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-4791-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shen L. Neural integration by short term potentiation. Biol Cybern. 1989;61:319–325. doi: 10.1007/BF00203180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mongillo G, Barak O, Tsodyks M. Synaptic theory of working memory. Science. 2008;319:1543–1546. doi: 10.1126/science.1150769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stokes MG. ‘Activity-silent’ working memory in prefrontal cortex: a dynamic coding framework. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 2015;19:394–405. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Goldman MS. Memory without feedback in a neural network. Neuron. 2009;61:621–634. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Guo ZV, et al. Maintenance of persistent activity in a frontal thalamocortical loop. Nature. 2017;545:181–186. doi: 10.1038/nature22324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rubinstein R, et al. Molecular logic of neuronal self-recognition through protocadherin domain interactions. Cell. 2015;163:629–642. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Volianskis A, et al. Different NMDA receptor subtypes mediate induction of long-term potentiation and two forms of short-term potentiation at CA1 synapses in rat hippocampus in vitro. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 2013;591:955–972. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.247296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Park P, et al. NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation comprises a family of temporally overlapping forms of synaptic plasticity that are induced by different patterns of stimulation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2014;369:20130131. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bliss TV, Collingridge GL. A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Nature. 1993;361:31–39. doi: 10.1038/361031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hebb, D. O. The organization of behavior: a neuropsychological theory. (John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1949).
- 46.Feldman DE. The spike-timing dependence of plasticity. Neuron. 2012;75:556–571. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lundqvist M, et al. Gamma and beta bursts underlie working memory. Neuron. 2016;90:152–164. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Anitha A, et al. Protocadherin α (PCDHA) as a novel susceptibility gene for autism. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013;38:192–198. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ukkola-Vuoti L, et al. Genome-wide copy number variation analysis in extended families and unrelated individuals characteriseed for musical aptitude and creativity in music. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tononi G, Koch C. Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2015;370:20140167. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shibuki K, et al. Dynamic imaging of somatosensory cortical activity in the rat visualized by flavoprotein autofluorescence. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 2003;549:919–927. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.040709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tada M, Takeuchi A, Hashizume M, Kitamura K, Kano M. A highly sensitive fluorescent indicator dye for calcium imaging of neural activity in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2014;39:1720–1728. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.