Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2018 Jan 2;69(5):1135–1145. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx456

Multiple mechanisms for enhanced plasmodesmata density in disparate subtypes of C4 grasses

Florence R Danila 1,2,, William Paul Quick 2,3,5, Rosemary G White 4, Steven Kelly 6, Susanne von Caemmerer 1,2, Robert T Furbank 1,2,4
PMCID: PMC6018992  PMID: 29300922

High plasmodesmata density in C4 grasses is a result of larger pit fields and/or more abundant plasmodesmata per pit field area.

Keywords: Bundle sheath, C4 decarboxylation types, C4 photosynthesis, grasses, mesophyll, pit field, plasmodesmata, symplastic transport

Abstract

Proliferation of plasmodesmata (PD) connections between bundle sheath (BS) and mesophyll (M) cells has been proposed as a key step in the evolution of two-cell C4 photosynthesis; However, a lack of quantitative data has hampered further exploration and validation of this hypothesis. In this study, we quantified leaf anatomical traits associated with metabolite transport in 18 species of BEP and PACMAD grasses encompassing four origins of C4 photosynthesis and all three C4 subtypes (NADP-ME, NAD-ME, and PCK). We demonstrate that C4 leaves have greater PD density between M and BS cells than C3 leaves. We show that this greater PD density is achieved by increasing either the pit field (cluster of PD) area or the number of PD per pit field area. NAD-ME species had greater pit field area per M–BS interface than NADP-ME or PCK species. In contrast, NADP-ME and PCK species had lower pit field area with increased number of PD per pit field area than NAD-ME species. Overall, PD density per M–BS cell interface was greatest in NAD-ME species while PD density in PCK species exhibited the largest variability. Finally, the only other anatomical characteristic that clearly distinguished C4 from C3 species was their greater Sb value, the BS surface area to subtending leaf area ratio. In contrast, BS cell volume was comparable between the C3 and C4 grass species examined.

Introduction

Most plants obtain sugars by fixing atmospheric CO2 using the enzyme Rubisco (ribulose bis-phosphate carboxylase oxygenase). This process is inherently inefficient as O2 competes with CO2 at the enzyme’s active site, resulting in formation of compounds that cost energy to recycle in a process known as photorespiration. The first product of photosynthetic CO2 fixation by Rubisco is a three-carbon sugar, hence this process is known as C3 photosynthesis. Many tropical and sub-tropical plant lineages have independently evolved a more efficient photosynthetic biochemistry, termed C4 photosynthesis (Hatch, 1987; Sage et al., 2011). Here, CO2 is first captured in mesophyll (M) cells as C4 acids, which then diffuse into bundle sheath (BS) cells, where Rubisco is located, and decarboxylated, resulting in greatly elevated local CO2 concentrations (Furbank and Hatch, 1987). This CO2-concentrating mechanism reduces photorespiration and enables Rubisco to operate close to its catalytic maximum (von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2003; Sage et al., 2012). It is thought that a reduction in atmospheric CO2 concentration ~35 million years ago may have driven the evolution of this CO2-concentrating mechanism (Sage, 2004).

Although many plants conduct C4 photosynthesis, a range of anatomical and biochemical specialisations distinguish different C4 lineages. For example, subcategories of C4 plants are defined by the enzymes that catalyse the decarboxylation of the C4 acid: NADP malic enzyme (NADP-ME) type, NAD malic enzyme (NAD-ME) type, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK) type (Hatch, 1987; Furbank, 2011). Particularly in grasses, these biochemical differences are further elaborated by anatomical specialisations that include the presence of the mestome sheath between the BS and the vasculature in NAD-ME and PCK types but not in the NADP-ME type (Hattersley and Watson, 1976); suberisation of the BS cells in NADP-ME and PCK types but not in the NAD-ME type (Hattersley and Browning, 1981); and oval chloroplasts positioned centrifugally with mitochondria in BS cells of NADP-ME and most PCK types but elongated chloroplasts positioned centripetally with mitochondria in BS cells of the NAD-ME type (Hattersley and Watson, 1976; Hattersley and Browning, 1981; Dengler et al., 1994; McKown and Dengler, 2007).

Over the last 35 million years, these evolutionary changes in anatomy and biochemistry arose independently at least 66 times (Sage et al., 2012). In grasses, 22–24 distinct C4 lineages are found within the PACMAD (Panicoideae, Aristidoideae, Chloridoideae, Micrairoideae, Arundinoideae, and Danthonioideae) clade, specifically in the subfamilies Panicoideae, Aristidoideae, Chloridoideae, and Micrairoideae (GPWGII, 2012). These subfamilies comprise many highly productive crop species such as sugar cane, millets, and maize. On the other hand, the subfamilies Bambusoideae, Ehrhartoideae, and Pooideae, known as the BEP clade (GPWGII, 2012), contain no C4 species. These subfamilies include staple food grains such as rice, wheat, and barley. Demand for food crops is predicted to increase by at least 50% in the next 35 years (Hibberd et al., 2008), and yield increases through traditional breeding of these C3 species will not meet this requirement. Recent breakthroughs in biotechnology may provide the opportunity to engineer the C4 photosynthetic pathway into C3 crops, which could potentially meet required improvements to feed the growing human population (Hibberd et al., 2008).

The biochemistry of C3 and C4 photosynthesis has been well studied, with a strong focus on either down-regulation/knockout (von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2016) or overexpression (Kajala et al., 2011) of one or more of the known key C4 photosynthetic enzymes in various plant systems to understand their function. Previous work has shown how leaf anatomical traits can be used to gain insight into C4 evolution (Hattersley and Watson, 1976; Dengler et al., 1994; McKown and Dengler, 2007). These studies mainly investigated traits related to the specialised vascular anatomy of C4 plants known as Kranz anatomy: a wreath-like arrangement of BS and M cell layers enclosing the vascular bundles. This anatomical arrangement separates the biochemical CO2 ‘pump’ in the M from Rubisco in the BS, and provides a barrier to CO2 diffusion out of the BS compartment (von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2003; Sage et al., 2012).

The requirement for metabolites to move at high rates between specialised C4 cell types has long been recognised to be important for C4 photosynthetic function (Osmond, 1971; Hatch and Osmond, 1976). Estimates of flux of photosynthetic metabolites between cell types in C4 leaves assume that the M–BS cell wall is impermeable due to the secondary thickening of cell walls between these cells (Danila et al., 2016). Hence, these metabolites must move between cell types via plasmodesmata (PD), the symplastic nanochannels that span cell walls and provide both a cytoplasmic and an endoplasmic continuum for metabolite transport (Osmond and Smith, 1976; Robards, 1976; Overall and Blackman, 1996). In leaves, PD are distributed in groups called pit fields. The available data on PD distribution between leaf cells in C3 and C4 species show that C4 plants have a greater density of PD than C3 plants (Botha, 1992; Danila et al., 2016). A major barrier to quantitatively examining these symplastic connections across diverse species has been the difficulty of the microscopy required to acquire statistically robust data (e.g. Botha, 1992). Recently, a high-throughput technique has been developed to assess PD density (Danila et al., 2016). This technique combines high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which allows analysis of individual PD within pit fields, and three-dimensional (3-D) immunolocalisation confocal microscopy for relatively rapid quantification of pit field distribution in a larger surface area across many cells within a leaf. Thus, it is now possible to quantify the PD connecting leaf cells of different C4 species and determine whether increased PD density at the M–BS interface is a conserved trait of C4 species and whether this density varies between different C4 subtypes. In this study, we quantify PD density between leaf cells in a selection of C3 and C4 grass species. These species encompass both BEP and PACMAD clades and include four origins of C4 photosynthesis comprising all C4 subtypes.

Materials and methods

Plant seeds and growth conditions

Seeds for Astrebla lappacea, Leptochloa fusca, Panicum miliaceum, P. antidotale, and Urochloa panicoides were gifted by Oula Ghannoum (Western Sydney University), Brachypodium distachyon seeds were obtained from CSIRO Black Mountain, and seeds from Oryza sativa cultivar Kitaake, Hordeum vulgare cultivar Yagan, Triticum aestivum cultivar Yecora 70, P. bisulcatum, P. coloratum, Sorghum bicolor cultivar Rooney, Zea mays cultivar B73, Cenchrus ciliaris, Setaria viridis cultivar A10, Paspalum dilatatum, Chloris gayana, and P. maximum (also known as Megathyrsus maximus) were obtained from the Research School of Biology (Australian National University). All seeds were germinated according to Danila et al. (2016). Growth conditions were maintained at 28 °C day/22 °C night temperatures, 60% relative humidity, 16 h light/8 h dark with peak at 1000 mmol quanta m–2 s–1 light intensity, and ambient CO2 concentration.

Phylogenetic tree construction

To construct a phylogenetic tree for this analysis the predicted protein sequences for each of the 18 species were subject to orthogroup inference using OrthoFinder (Emms and Kelly, 2015) and a set of 60 single-copy orthogroups containing sequences from at least 16 of the 18 grass species were identified (Supplementary Dataset S1 at JXB online). These protein sequences were aligned using MergeAlign (Collingridge and Kelly, 2012), edited to remove all gap-containing columns, concatenated, and subjected to 1000 replicates of a non-parametric bootstrapped maximum-likelihood phylogenetic inference using FastTree (Price et al., 2010). The full-length concatenated alignment was also used for Bayesian phylogenetic tree inference using mrBayes v 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001). The amino acid model was set to JTT and the covarion was turned on. Two runs, each of four chains, were initiated and allowed to run for 100 000 generations sampling every 100 generations. Convergence was assessed through visual inspection of log-likelihood traces and through analysis of the standard deviation of split frequencies (σ2<0.00001).

Leaf anatomical sample preparation

All leaf tissue preparations for light microscopy, SEM, and 3-D immunolocalisation confocal microscopy were as described by Danila et al. (2016). The middle portion of the youngest fully expanded leaf from three individual 9-d-old seedlings per species were collected and pooled. From this sample pool, leaf tissues were fixed and processed accordingly. For 3-D immunolocalisation confocal microscopy, leaf tissue was cleared using PEA-CLARITY (Palmer et al., 2015), hybridised with β-1,3-glucan (callose) antibody, followed by Alexa488-tagged secondary antibody, and post-stained with calcofluor white to visualise cell walls (Danila et al., 2016).

Microscopy

Transverse sections of all grass leaves were imaged for light microscopy under 10× and 40× objectives using a Nikon Eclipse 50i upright microscope (Nikon Instruments). SEM was performed using a Zeiss Ultra Plus field emission scanning electron microscope at 3 kV. To quantify pit field distribution, two z-stacks from two leaf tissues per species were obtained using a Leica SP8 multiphoton confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems). Details can be found in Danila et al. (2016).

Quantitative leaf anatomical measurement

Different from the conventional use of resin-embedded leaf tissue, BS cell area was measured from 25 to 50 individual cells of minor veins using virtual z-sections through entire confocal z-stacks for each species. BS cell volume was calculated by multiplying the BS cell area by BS cell length, which was measured using cell images (n=30 to 160) obtained from the paradermally orientated confocal micrographs of the same leaf z-stacks (Turrell, 1936). Vein diameter and interveinal distance (IVD) were measured using 10 to 25 individual minor veins from light micrographs of transverse leaf sections (see Supplementary Fig. S1). The bundle sheath surface area per unit leaf area, Sb, was calculated using the equation described in Pengelly et al. (2010). To determine cell-to-cell PD connectivity among different subtypes of C4 photosynthesis, the frequency of PD within pit fields and density of pit fields per cell interface were analysed using SEM and confocal microscopy, respectively, in PCK (n=3 species), NAD-ME (n=4), and NADP-ME (n=6) grasses. For reference, representative grasses from C3 BEP (n=4) and C3 PACMAD (n=1) were also measured. Quantitation of PD per µm2 pit field (n=18 or more whole pit fields obtained from SEM), percent pit field per cell interface area (n=5 or more maximum intensity projection images generated from two confocal z-stacks), and PD per µm2 cell interface were carried out as described in Danila et al. (2016). PD quantification values used for O. sativa, T. aestivum, Z. mays, and S. viridis were as reported in Danila et al. (2016) (see Supplementary Table S1 for specific details). The cross-sectional area of at least 40 individual PD enclosed by the wall collar (Faulkner et al., 2008) (termed as PD area here) located in the M–BS cell interface was measured from SEM images. PD area per M–BS interface area and PD area per unit leaf area were calculated as follows:

PD area per MBS interface area=PD area×PD per µm2 MBS cell interface
PD area per unit leaf area=PD area per MBS interface area×Sb

All anatomical measurements were performed using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using one-way (photosynthetic type and species) ANOVA (OriginPro 9.1, OriginLab Corporation). Means were grouped using a post hoc Tukey test.

Results

C4 origin and lineage representation

A phylogenetic tree of the 18 species was adapted from GPWGII (2012). It is currently thought that this set of species encompass four independent origins of C4 photosynthesis (GPWGII, 2012). The independent evolutionary origins of C4 are indicated in Fig. 1 where species are colour-coded according to their photosynthetic type (Table 1); this coding and species order are retained throughout the paper.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Phylogenetic tree of the C3 and C4 grass species examined in this study, which is identical to the expected topology from GPWGII (2012). Species names are colour-coded according to photosynthetic types: black, C3; green, C4 PCK; blue, C4 NAD-ME; magenta, C4 NADP-ME. The four independent evolutionary origins of C4 photosynthesis are indicated with green circles at the midpoint of the branches. Support values at internal nodes are ML/B, where ML is the percentage of non-parametric bootstrap replicates that support the bipartition, and B is the Bayesian posterior probability for the bipartition. The scale bar indicates 0.1 substitutions per site.

Table 1.

Photosynthetic type, taxonomic group (subfamily and tribe), and C4 lineage representation of the 18 grass species examined

Grass species Photosynthetic type Subfamily Tribe C4 lineage*
Oryza sativa cv Kitaake C3, BEP Ehrhartoideae Oryzeae Not applicable
Brachypodium distachyon C3, BEP Pooideae Brachypoideae Not applicable
Hordeum vulgare cv Yagan C3, BEP Pooideae Triticeae Not applicable
Triticum aestivum cv Yecora 70 C3, BEP Pooideae Triticeae Not applicable
Chloris gayana C4 PCK, PACMAD Chloridoideae Cynodonteae Chloridoideae
Leptochloa fusca C4 NAD-ME, PACMAD Chloridoideae Cynodonteae Chloridoideae
Astrebla lappacea C4 NAD-ME, PACMAD Chloridoideae Cynodonteae Chloridoideae
Paspalum dilatatum C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paspaleae Paspalum
Sorghum bicolor cv Rooney C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Andropogoneae Andropogoneae
Zea mays cv B73 C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Andropogoneae Andropogoneae
Panicum bisulcatum C3, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae C3 sister to MPC
Panicum coloratum C4 NAD-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Panicum miliaceum C4 NAD-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Panicum maximum C4 PCK, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Urochloa panicoides C4 PCK, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Setaria viridis cv A10 C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Cenchrus ciliaris C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC
Panicum antidotale C4 NADP-ME, PACMAD Panicoideae Paniceae MPC

*According to GPWGII, (2012).

MPC, Melinidinae, Panicinae, and Cenchrinae.

Plasmodesmata in C4 grasses

Analysis of pit field size (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1) and patterns of pit field distribution (Fig. 3) revealed that NAD-ME species had the largest and most abundant pit fields (in terms of area coverage) on the M–BS cell interface. Both NADP-ME and PCK species had smaller and less abundant pit fields. C3 species, from both the BEP (Figs 2A–D, 3A–D) and PACMAD (Figs 2K, 3K) clades, had considerably less abundant, smaller pit fields. The large pit fields in NAD-ME species had more widely spaced PD (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S1). Indeed, NAD-ME species had fewer PD per pit field area on the M–BS cell interface compared to NADP-ME and most PCK species (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table S1). This was offset by the greater percent pit field area per M–BS cell interface area in NAD-ME species compared to NADP-ME and PCK species (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Table S1). The resulting PD density per M–BS cell interface was greater in NAD-ME compared to NADP-ME species, with large variation observed amongst the PCK species (Fig. 4C, Supplementary Table S1). C4 species also had greater PD density on the M–M cell interface relative to the C3 species but there was no substantial variation among the C4 subtypes (Figs. 4D–F, Supplementary Table S1). Estimates of the cross-sectional area of individual PD revealed no significant differences between the two photosynthetic pathways and among decarboxylation types (Fig. 4G, Supplementary Table S1). The proportion of the M–BS cell interface populated by PD (Fig. 4H, Supplementary Table S1) and the M–BS PD area per unit leaf area (Fig. 4I, Supplementary Table S1) were greater in C4 species than C3 species, and followed the pattern of PD density for the C4 decarboxylation types.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Scanning electron micrographs showing pit field size on the mesophyll–bundle sheath cell interface of C3 and C4 grass leaves. (A–D) C3 BEP species (black frames): (A) Oryza sativa, (B) Brachypodium distachyon, (C) Hordeum vulgare, and (D) Triticum aestivum. (E, N, O) C4 PCK (green frames): (E) Chloris gayana, (N) Panicum maximum, and (O) Urochloa panicoides. (F, G, L, M) C4 NAD-ME (blue frames): (F) Leptochloa fusca, (G) Astrebla lappacea, (L) Panicum coloratum, and (M) Panicum miliaceum. (H–J, P–R) C4 NADP-ME (magenta frames): (H) Paspalum dilatatum, (I) Sorghum bicolor, (J) Zea mays, (P) Setaria viridis, (Q) Cenchrus ciliaris, and (R) Panicum antidotale. (K) C3 PACMAD (black frame): Panicum bisulcatum. Each pit field is enclosed with a dotted white line. The micrograph of P. miliaceum (M) is zoomed out to show whole pit fields. Scale bars are 1 µm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Confocal micrographs showing the patterns of pit field distribution on the mesophyll–bundle sheath cell interface of C3 and C4 grass leaves. (A–D) C3 BEP species (black frames): (A) Oryza sativa, (B) Brachypodium distachyon, (C) Hordeum vulgare, and (D) Triticum aestivum. (E, N, O) C4 PCK (green frames): (E) Chloris gayana, (N) Panicum maximum, and (O) Urochloa panicoides. (F, G, L, M) C4 NAD-ME (blue frames): (F) Leptochloa fusca, (G) Astrebla lappacea, (L) Panicum coloratum, and (M) Panicum miliaceum. (H–J, P–R) C4 NADP-ME (magenta frames): (H) Paspalum dilatatum, (I) Sorghum bicolor, (J) Zea mays, (P) Setaria viridis, (Q) Cenchrus ciliaris, and (R) Panicum antidotale. (K) C3 PACMAD (black frame): Panicum bisulcatum. Green fluorescence corresponds to pit fields. Scale bars are 10 µm.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Distribution of plasmodesmata trait values among photosynthetic types. The distribution of nine variables is summarised by boxplots individually for the C3 BEP and PACMAD (black, n=5), C4 PCK (green, n=3), C4 NAD-ME (blue, n=4), and C4 NADP-ME (magenta, n=6). Box and whiskers represent the 25 to 75 percentiles, and the minimum and maximum distribution. Means are denoted by dots. Letters show the statistical ranking using a post hoc Tukey test among photosynthetic types (different letters indicate differences at P<0.05). Data for individual species are given in Supplementary Table S1. M, mesophyll; BS, bundle sheath; PD, plasmodesmata.

Bundle sheath of C4 grasses

Our 3-D approach to measure BS cell cross-sectional areas and volumes used confocal micrographs derived from z-stacks of the leaf (Fig. 5). Measurement of the BS cell cross-sectional areas revealed no significant difference between the C3 and C4 species examined (Fig. 6A, Supplementary Table S2). Although shorter BS cell length in C4 species compared to C3 species was observed (Fig. 6B, Supplementary Table S2), the calculated BS cell volumes were similar for the C3 and C4 species examined (Fig. 6C, Supplementary Table S2). Measurements from light micrographs of transverse leaf sections showed NAD-ME and NADP-ME species had the largest and smallest vein diameter, respectively, with C3 and PCK species being intermediate (Fig. 6D, Supplementary Table S2). As expected, leaf interveinal distance (IVD) was larger in C3 species than in C4 species (Fig. 6E, Supplementary Table S2), but among the C4 species the IVDs were not significantly different (Fig. 6E, Supplementary Table S2). Conversely, BS cell surface area per unit leaf area (Sb) of C4 species was double that of C3 species (Fig. 6F, Supplementary Table S2).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Confocal micrographs obtained from 3-D stacks of C3 and C4 grass leaves showing bundle sheath cells in paradermal (top) and transverse (bottom) orientations. (A–D) C3 BEP species (black lines): (A) Oryza sativa, (B) Brachypodium distachyon, (C) Hordeum vulgare, and (D) Triticum aestivum. (E, N, O) C4 PCK (green lines): (E) Chloris gayana, (N) Panicum maximum, and (O) Urochloa panicoides. (F, G, L, M) C4 NAD-ME (blue lines): (F) Leptochloa fusca, (G) Astrebla lappacea, (L) Panicum coloratum, and (M) Panicum miliaceum. (H–J, P–R) C4 NADP-ME (magenta lines): (H) Paspalum dilatatum, (I) Sorghum bicolor, (J) Zea mays, (P) Setaria viridis, (Q) Cenchrus ciliaris, and (R) Panicum antidotale. (K) C3 PACMAD (black line): Panicum bisulcatum. Bundle sheath cells are outlined in white. Scale bars are 20 µm.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Distribution of bundle sheath-related trait values among photosynthetic types. The distribution of six variables is summarised by boxplots individually for the C3 BEP and PACMAD (black, n=5), C4 PCK (green, n=3), C4 NAD-ME (blue, n=4), and C4 NADP-ME (magenta, n=6). Boxes and whisker plots are as described in Fig. 4. Data for individual species are given in Supplementary Table S2. BS, bundle sheath; Sb, bundle sheath surface area per unit leaf area.

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that PD are more abundant at the M–BS cell interface in a C4 leaf compared to a C3 leaf (Botha, 1992; Danila et al., 2016), presumably to accommodate the higher demand for metabolite transport between cell types in the C4 leaf that is required to support the C4 photosynthetic mechanism (Hatch and Osmond, 1976; Weber and von Caemmerer, 2010). However, little is known about the variation of PD density at the M–BS interface amongst C4 species and the different decarboxylation types. Modelling of metabolite movement between M and BS cells has been hampered by the lack of quantitative data on PD density at this key cellular interface (Danila et al., 2016). To address this, we extended our PD density quantification to a larger subset of grasses representative of C3 photosynthesis, in both BEP (n=4) and PACMAD (n=1) clades, and in all the C4 decarboxylation types: NAD-ME (n=4), NADP-ME (n=6), and PCK (n=3) (Table 1). We confirmed that not only did all the C4 species examined have greater PD density than the C3 species, but that there was also substantial variation in how the high M–BS PD density was achieved among different C4 subtypes.

Increased PD density in C4 grasses is a result of larger pit fields and/or more abundant PD per pit field area

Here we show that C4 species have evolved greater PD density than C3 species. Greater symplastic connectivity can be achieved by increasing the pit field area or by increasing the PD per pit field area. Interestingly we saw both solutions in our data, particularly in the M–BS interface. In NAD-ME species we saw an increase in pit field area without increasing PD per pit field area, while in PCK and NADP-ME species we saw an increase in both. We propose that the NAD-ME solution is due to their larger veins and thus their need for larger pit fields to facilitate transport. However, in PCK and NADP-ME types where veins are smaller it is sufficient just to increase PD per pit field area without much increase in pit field area to achieve the same effect. These results indicate that there is genetic plasticity in the way in which increased PD transport is achieved in C4 grasses.

NAD-ME grasses have the greatest pit field area per M–BS interface among the C4 decarboxylation types

High PD density at the M–BS interface in NAD-ME grasses was solely determined by increases in pit field area per M–BS area driven by larger pit fields (rather than more numerous small pit fields). This is interesting in light of the unique aspects of NAD-ME BS cell anatomy (Dengler et al., 1994). The distinct characteristics of BS cell chloroplasts and mitochondria in NAD-ME species compared to NADP-ME and PCK types (Dengler et al., 1994) are consistent with the different solution they used to achieve high M–BS PD density. This supports the suggestion that PD function and formation are strongly coordinated with the function of both chloroplasts and mitochondria (Brunkard et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2017). Both the centripetal arrangement of mitochondria and larger BS cell cross-sectional area provide a longer diffusion pathlength in the NAD-ME leaf (von Caemmerer et al., 2007). While this anatomical attribute minimises CO2 leakage across the M–BS interface, it may limit the rate of the C4 cycle activity (von Caemmerer et al., 2007). More PD connections between M and BS cells allows rapid metabolite shuttling for the C4 cycle in the NAD-ME type (von Caemmerer et al., 2007), therefore sustaining the high C4 photosynthetic rate (Henderson et al., 1992; Pinto et al., 2014). Correspondingly, the centrifugal arrangement of chloroplasts and mitochondria in the NADP-ME type presents a greater possibility of CO2 leakage (von Caemmerer et al., 2007). However, fewer PD between M and BS cells in NADP-ME leaves, in combination with the suberin lamella surrounding the BS, minimises this possibility (von Caemmerer et al., 2007). It is interesting that there was almost as much diversity in the PD density at the M–BS interface among PCK species as there was across C4 grasses as a whole. This wide range of PD densities in the PCK species examined could result from both PCK and NAD decarboxylation located in the BS (von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2003) together with their considerable variation in BS cell cross-sectional areas, BS chloroplast morphology and positioning, and abundance of mitochondria in the BS (Hattersley and Browning, 1981).

Large PD size between photosynthetic cells is found in leaves of all the grass species examined

Using TEM sections for PD studies presents advantages and disadvantages, highly dependent on the purpose of the study (i.e. ultrastructure versus quantification). For our purpose of analysing many samples, SEM analysis was a more rapid and rigorous way to quantify the cross-sectional area of individual PD in grasses. Random tearing of leaf tissue to reveal M–BS or M–M cell interfaces allowed us to expose the cross-sectional area of PD, almost always within the middle cavity because the tissue tended to separate along the middle lamella between tissue layers. In our previous paper (Danila et al., 2016), our PD area measurements from TEM micrographs used only PD cross-sections with distinct central desmotubules. Similar measurements taken from previously published TEM micrographs of grass leaf PD (fig. 8 from Botha, 1992) generated values similar to both our TEM and SEM results. In fact, the similarity of PD area values we obtained when we compared our TEM and SEM measurements for O. sativa, Z. mays, and S. viridis encouraged us to use SEM in place of TEM for PD area measurement. We find it interesting that the PD areas we obtained in all cases were very large (about 0.006 μm2), the diameter being in the range of 90 nm, while the majority of published values for land-plant PD, many of which were obtained from root PD measurements, have a diameter of 50 nm or smaller (Overall, 1999; Ehlers and Kollmann, 2001).

Anatomical enablers of C4 photosynthesis

It has been proposed that enlargement of the BS cells in C4 leaves compared to C3 leaves and their ‘functionalisation’ by increases in chloroplast number was an early step in C4 evolution (Sage, 2004). Clearly, in this study we showed that there is little evidence for BS cells in C4 grasses being larger in volume than their C3 counterparts. What we saw instead was a distinctively large BS surface area to leaf area ratio (Sb) in C4 grass leaves compared to C3 leaves, consistent with the report of Hattersley (1984). We therefore argue that increasing Sb, but not BS cell size, is important in C4 leaf physiology (von Caemmerer et al., 2007). This finding emphasises the importance of looking at the 3-D geometry of cells in addition to the 2-D view for a more global cell perspective and for improved accuracy in terms of reporting measured values (Théroux-Rancourt et al., 2017). Large IVD is also not always a clear indication of C3 anatomy because it can be interpreted as either an increase in interveinal M cell number (as in C3 grasses) or an increase in BS cell cross-sectional area (as in most NAD-ME and PCK grasses). Our observations showed consistently greater PD density on the M–BS interface in all the C4 species examined relative to the C3 species. Another potentially useful diagnostic character is pit field density, as seen in the substantial difference between the NAD-ME types and other decarboxylation types. This could be used to distinguish not only C3 from C4 photosynthesis but also among C4 biochemical types, at least in grasses.

PD density, metabolite flux, and CO2 diffusion in the C4 BS

PD density at the M–BS interface affects not only metabolite diffusion but also leakage of inorganic carbon and O2 out of the BS compartment, an important determinant of the efficiency of C4 photosynthesis (von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2003). While it is difficult to directly determine the CO2 concentration in the BS of C4 plants, this parameter can be modelled using certain assumptions concerning leaf cell anatomical dimensions, inorganic carbon equilibration, and diffusion properties of membranes and PD (Furbank and Hatch, 1987; Jenkins et al., 1989; von Caemmerer and Furbank, 2003). Based on permeability coefficients determined for metabolites moving into isolated BS cells through PD (Weiner et al., 1988) and for CO2 in C4 leaves and isolated BS cells (Furbank et al., 1989; Jenkins et al., 1989), Jenkins et al. (1989) calculated that approximately 40% of the CO2 leakage from the BS occurs via an apoplastic route and 60% via the PD. For oxygen, which moves poorly through lipid bilayers and polymeric barriers such as suberin (Jenkins et al., 1989), the majority of diffusion will be through the aqueous route, i.e. via PD. Likewise, bicarbonate moves poorly through lipid membranes and will diffuse out of the BS mostly via PD (Furbank et al., 1989). Given these modelled values for inorganic carbon and O2 movement at the M–BS interface, the ‘optimal’ PD density for a C4 leaf would be a compromise between high density for metabolite transport and dissipation of O2 (in species with PSII in the BS chloroplast), and leakage of inorganic carbon from the BS compartment. The quantification of PD density made here is a first step towards enabling more accurate modelling of metabolite flux and leakage of inorganic carbon from the BS across a range of species and decarboxylation types (Wang et al., 2014). The key parameter required for predicting metabolite gradients and leaf cell metabolite concentrations required to support the C4 pathway is the proportion of M–BS interface comprised of PD pores (Osmond, 1971; Hatch and Osmond, 1976). The current work provides these data for a range of species. The values provide an upper limit given that not all PD may be functional and the obstruction of the PD area by the desmotubule has not been taken into account. Nevertheless, these data facilitate modelling of inorganic carbon leakage rates from the BS without resorting to the use of permeability values obtained from isolated cells (Jenkins et al., 1989). This will be particularly useful for interspecific comparisons given the diversity in suberisation of the M–BS interface between species and the diverse arrangements of organelles and cellular sites of C4 acid decarboxylation across the three biochemical types.

Evolution of symplastic connections to the BS in C4 leaves

It has been reported previously that the transition from C3 to C4 photosynthesis involved a series of genetic alterations, mostly gain of function, leading to numerous changes in plant anatomy and biochemistry (Sage et al., 2012; Bräutigam et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014; Emms et al., 2016). Recently it was suggested that evolution of C4 photosynthesis has involved a change in the apoplastic transport of sugars in the BS cells of C4 leaves (Emms et al., 2016). A sugar effluxer (or SWEET protein) appears to have been recruited from a relatively minor role in the M cells of C3 grasses to become one of the most highly expressed transcripts in the C4 BS cells (Emms et al., 2016). While we have not as yet identified the genetic changes responsible, we show here that PD density was at least doubled in C4 species compared to C3 species, a clear indication of enhanced expression of PD developmental genes. However, to date, the genes underpinning PD development remain largely unknown (Brunkard and Zambryski, 2017). It is intriguing to consider whether the proposed evolutionary pressures to recruit a highly expressed sugar effluxer to the BS cells of C4 plants were linked to the proliferation of PD at the M–BS interface in C4 leaves. Recent data from genome-wide gene-tree/species-tree reconciliation in grasses has revealed multiple functional categories of genes, of which 10 genes were found to have plausible association with the symplastic transport function (Emms et al., 2016). This leads us to be optimistic that the discovery of candidate genes controlling PD development may be not too far away.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Dataset S1. Single-copy orthologous gene sequences used for phylogenetic tree construction (supplied as a BZIP2 file).

Fig. S1. Light micrographs of transverse sections of C3 and C4 grass leaves.

Table S1. Quantitative plasmodesmata traits of the 18 grass species examined.

Table S2. Leaf anatomical traits quantified in the 18 grass species examined.

Supplementary Figure S1 and Tables S1_S2
Dataset S1

Acknowledgements

We thank the ANU Centre for Advanced Microscopy (CAM), Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility (AMMRF), and CSIRO Black Mountain Microimaging Centre (BMIC) for providing support and technical assistance. FRD is supported by scholarship awards from the Lee Foundation (IRRI) and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis (CE140100015). SK is a Royal Society University Research Fellow. Work in SK’s lab is supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 637765.

References

  1. Botha CE. 1992. Plasmodesmatal distribution, structure and frequency in relation to assimilation in C3 and C4 grasses in southern Africa. Planta 187, 348–358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bräutigam A, Schliesky S, Külahoglu C, Osborne CP, Weber AP. 2014. Towards an integrative model of C4 photosynthetic subtypes: insights from comparative transcriptome analysis of NAD-ME, NADP-ME, and PEP-CK C4 species. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3579–3593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunkard JO, Runkel AM, Zambryski PC. 2013. Plasmodesmata dynamics are coordinated by intracellular signaling pathways. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 16, 614–620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunkard JO, Zambryski PC. 2017. Plasmodesmata enable multicellularity: new insights into their evolution, biogenesis, and functions in development and immunity. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 35, 76–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collingridge PW, Kelly S. 2012. MergeAlign: improving multiple sequence alignment performance by dynamic reconstruction of consensus multiple sequence alignments. BMC Bioinformatics 13, 117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Danila FR, Quick WP, White RG, Furbank RT, von Caemmerer S. 2016. The metabolite pathway between bundle sheath and mesophyll: quantification of plasmodesmata in leaves of C3 and C4 monocots. The Plant Cell 28, 1461–1471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dengler NG, Dengler RE, Donnelly PM, Hattersley PW. 1994. Quantitative leaf anatomy of C3 and C4 grasses (Poaceae): bundle sheath and mesophyll surface area relationships. Annals of Botany 73, 241–255. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ehlers K, Kollmann R. 2001. Primary and secondary plasmodesmata: structure, origin, and functioning. Protoplasma 216, 1–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Emms DM, Covshoff S, Hibberd JM, Kelly S. 2016. Independent and parallel evolution of new genes by gene duplication in two origins of C4 photosynthesis provides new insight into the mechanism of phloem loading in C4 species. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 1796–1806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Emms DM, Kelly S. 2015. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biology 16, 157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Faulkner C, Akman OE, Bell K, Jeffree C, Oparka K. 2008. Peeking into pit fields: a multiple twinning model of secondary plasmodesmata formation in tobacco. The Plant Cell 20, 1504–1518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Furbank RT. 2011. Evolution of the C4 photosynthetic mechanism: are there really three C4 acid decarboxylation types?Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 3103–3108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Furbank RT, Hatch MD. 1987. Mechanism of C4 photosynthesis: the size and composition of the inorganic carbon pool in bundle sheath cells. Plant Physiology 85, 958–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furbank RT, Jenkins CL, Hatch MD. 1989. CO2 concentrating mechanism of C4 photosynthesis: permeability of isolated bundle sheath cells to inorganic carbon. Plant Physiology 91, 1364–1371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. GPWGII (Grass Phylogeny Working Group II) 2012. New grass phylogeny resolves deep evolutionary relationships and discovers C4 origins. New Phytologist 193, 304–312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hatch MD. 1987. C4 photosynthesis: a unique blend of modified biochemistry, anatomy and ultrastructure. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 895, 81–106. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hatch MD, Osmond CB. 1976. Compartmentation and transport in C4 photosynthesis. In: Stocking CR, Heber U, eds. Transport in plants III. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 144–184. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hattersley PW. 1984. Characterization of C4 type leaf anatomy in grasses (Poaceae). mesophyll: bundle sheath area ratios. Annals of Botany 53, 163–180. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hattersley PW, Browning AJ. 1981. Occurrence of the suberized lamella in leaves of grasses of different photosynthetic types. I. In parenchymatous bundle sheaths and PCR (“Kranz”) sheaths. Protoplasma 109, 371–401. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hattersley PW, Watson L. 1976. C4 Grasses: an anatomical criterion for distinguishing between NADP-malic enzyme species and PCK or NAD-malic enzyme species. Australian Journal of Botany 24, 297–308. [Google Scholar]
  21. Henderson S, Caemmerer S, Farquhar G. 1992. Short-term measurements of carbon isotope discrimination in several C4 species. Functional Plant Biology 19, 263–285. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hibberd JM, Sheehy JE, Langdale JA. 2008. Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice—rationale and feasibility. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11, 228–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jenkins CL, Furbank RT, Hatch MD. 1989. Mechanism of C4 photosynthesis: a model describing the inorganic carbon pool in bundle sheath cells. Plant Physiology 91, 1372–1381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kajala K, Covshoff S, Karki S et al. 2011. Strategies for engineering a two-celled C4 photosynthetic pathway into rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 3001–3010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. McKown AD, Dengler NG. 2007. Key innovations in the evolution of Kranz anatomy and C4 vein pattern in Flaveria (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany 94, 382–399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Osmond CB. 1971. Metabolite transport in C4 photosynthesis. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 24, 159–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Osmond CB, Smith FA. 1976. Symplastic transport of metabolites during C4-photosynthesis. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW, eds. Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 229–241. [Google Scholar]
  29. Overall RL. 1999. Substructure of plasmodesmata. In: van Bel AJE, Van Kesteren WP, eds. Plasmodesmata. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  30. Overall RL, Blackman LM. 1996. A model of the macromolecular structure of plasmodesmata. Trends in Plant Science 1, 307–311. [Google Scholar]
  31. Palmer WM, Martin AP, Flynn JR, Reed SL, White RG, Furbank RT, Grof CP. 2015. PEA-CLARITY: 3D molecular imaging of whole plant organs. Scientific Reports 5, 13492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pengelly JJ, Sirault XR, Tazoe Y, Evans JR, Furbank RT, von Caemmerer S. 2010. Growth of the C4 dicot Flaveria bidentis: photosynthetic acclimation to low light through shifts in leaf anatomy and biochemistry. Journal of Experimental Botany 61, 4109–4122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pinto H, Sharwood RE, Tissue DT, Ghannoum O. 2014. Photosynthesis of C3, C3-C4, and C4 grasses at glacial CO2. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3669–3681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2 – approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE 5, e9490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Robards AW. 1976. Plasmodesmata in higher plants. In: Gunning BES, Robards AW, eds. Intercellular communication in plants: studies on plasmodesmata. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 15–57. [Google Scholar]
  36. Sage RF. 2004. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis. New Phytologist 161, 341–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sage RF, Christin PA, Edwards EJ. 2011. The C4 plant lineages of planet Earth. Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 3155–3169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sage RF, Sage TL, Kocacinar F. 2012. Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 19–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Théroux-Rancourt G, Earles JM, Gilbert ME, Zwieniecki MA, Boyce CK, McElrone AJ, Brodersen CR. 2017. The bias of a two-dimensional view: comparing two-dimensional and three-dimensional mesophyll surface area estimates using noninvasive imaging. New Phytologist 215, 1609–1622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Turrell FM. 1936. The area of the internal exposed surface of dicotyledon leaves. American Journal of Botany 23, 255–264. [Google Scholar]
  41. von Caemmerer S, Evans JR, Cousins AB, Badger MR, Furbank RT. 2007. C4 photosynthesis and CO2 diffusion. In: Sheehy JE, Mitchell PL, Hardy B, eds. Charting new pathways to C4 rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 95–115. [Google Scholar]
  42. von Caemmerer S, Furbank RT. 2003. The C4 pathway: an efficient CO2 pump. Photosynthesis Research 77, 191–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. von Caemmerer S, Furbank RT. 2016. Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 31, 125–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang P, Khoshravesh R, Karki S et al. 2017. Re-creation of a key step in the evolutionary switch from C3 to C4 leaf anatomy. Current Biology 27, 3278–3287.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang Y, Bräutigam A, Weber AP, Zhu XG. 2014. Three distinct biochemical subtypes of C4 photosynthesis? A modelling analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 65, 3567–3578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weber AP, von Caemmerer S. 2010. Plastid transport and metabolism of C3 and C4 plants — comparative analysis and possible biotechnological exploitation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13, 257–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weiner H, Burnell JN, Woodrow IE, Heldt HW, Hatch MD. 1988. Metabolite diffusion into bundle sheath cells from C4 plants: relation to C4 photosynthesis and plasmodesmatal function. Plant Physiology 88, 815–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S1 and Tables S1_S2
Dataset S1

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES