Abstract
Despite the critical role ruthenium and osmium complexes have played in the development of transition metal dinitrogen chemistry, they have not been previously shown to mediate catalytic N2-to-NH3 conversion (N2RR), nor have M-NxHy complexes been derived from protonation of M-N2 precursors (M = Ru, Os). To help delineate key factors for N2RR catalysis, we report on isostructural tris(phosphino)silyl Ru and Os complexes that mediate catalytic N2RR, and compare their activities with an isostructural iron complex. The Os system is most active, and is demonstrated to liberate more than 120 equiv NH3 per Os center in a single batch experiment using Cp*2Co and [H2NPh2][OTf] as the reductant and acid source. Isostructural Ru and Fe complexes generate very little NH3 under the same conditions. Protonation of an anionic Os-N2− state affords a structurally characterized Os=NNH2+ hydrazido species that itself mediates NH3 generation, suggesting it is a plausible intermediate of the catalysis. Os-hydride species are characterized that form during catalysis as inactive species.
Synthetic Mo and Fe model systems have been identified as catalysts for N2-to-NH3 conversion (N2RR).1,2 The development of these catalytic systems has in part been motivated by the role(s) these metals may play in biological nitrogen fixation, and the desire to test various mechanistic hypotheses using well-defined inorganic model complexes.3 In contrast, synthetic models based on metals other than Fe or Mo that display efficacy for catalytic N2RR are to date limited to two cobalt systems, both of which use a combination of strong acid and reductant in the form of [H(OEt2)2][BArF4] (HBArF4, BArF4 = tetrakis (3,5-bis(trifluorome thyl)phenyl)borate) and KC8.4
The heavier group VIII elements Ru and Os have played a significant role in the history and development of ammonia synthesis and M-N2 model chemistry. For example, a very active heterogeneous Ru catalyst is used in the industrial Kellog Advanced Am-monia Process (KAAP),5 and the first metal-dinitrogen complex to be discovered featured ruthenium ((NH3)5Ru-N22+).6 Noteworthy achievements in Ru and Os model chemistry have included (1) the demonstration of terminal nitride (M=N[2/3+]) coupling to form (iso- lable or transient) N2-bridged bimetallics of the type LnM-N2- MLn[4/5/6+] (M = Ru or Os);7,8 (2) photochemically induced homo- lytic N2 cleavage to generate terminal Os≡N products;9 (3) selective protonation and hydrogenation of terminal osmium nitrides to generate NH3;10 and (4) step-wise NH3 oxidation to N2 via diimide (HN=NH) and hydrazine (N2H4) intermediates at cofacial Ru porphyrins.11
Despite these advances, there remain no examples of synthetic Ru or Os complexes that demonstrate step-wise protonation of M-N2 to generate M-NxHy species, nor complexes featuring these metals that catalyze N2RR.12 Germane to our present interest, the identification and study of a homologous, isostructural series of complexes (Fe, Ru, Os) will help to better delineate some of the key factors for N2RR catalyst design.
A limitation with respect to achieving N2RR catalysis by either Ru or Os is that low-valent redox states (< 2+) can be difficult to access for these metals.13 In systems where such states may be accessed, it is common for the electron(s) to be ligandrather than metal-localized; this is especially true of d7 systems.14 For M-N2 species, this should in turn lead to a less activated, and thereby less readily functionalized, N2 ligand. One notable exception in this context are the [M]-N2[0/1-] redox pairs (M = Ru, Os; Figure 1) previously reported by our group, where utilization of a rigid, chelating tris(phosphine)silyl ligand permits access to low-valent MI and M0 terminal dinitrogen compounds.14a These species exhibit v(NN) stretching frequencies suggestive of highly activated, terminally bonded N2 ligands. To our knowledge, K(THF)2+[Os]-N2− (abbreviated hereafter as [Os]-N2−) exhibits the lowest v(NN) stretching frequency (1931 cm−1) known for a terminal N2 adduct of Ru or Os (Figure 1).14a
Figure 1.
Ruthenium and osmium N2RR catalysts studied herein and some relevant physical data (from references 14a and 18).
Herein, we establish that both [Ru]-N2− and [Os] -N2− mediate catalytic N2RR. [Os]-N2− is a particularly competent catalyst in the presence of Cp*2Co and mild acids. Moreover, the N2 ligand of [Os]-N2− can be protonated to afford a structurally characterized [Os] =NNH2+ hydrazido complex, a likely intermediate by analogy to related [Fe] =NNH2+ species that have been implicated as intermediates of N2RR by our lab.15 Catalytically inactive Os-hydride species are characterized that appear to form as thermodynamic sinks of the spent catalyst system.
The N2RR performance of [Ru]-N2− and [Os]-N2− was initially canvassed under conditions similar to those first studied in the context of N2RR by related iron systems (46 equivHBArF4, 50 equiv KC8, 1 atm N2,Et2O, −78 °C).2a-d [Os]-N2− affords 1.6 ± 0.3 equiv of NH3 (Table 1, entry 1) under these conditions, exceeding that observed for [Na(12-crown-4)2][P3SiFe-N2] ([Fe]-N2−; entry 2).[Ru]-N2− performs better under these conditions (entry 3), affording 4.3 ± 0.3 equiv of NH3 (28% selectivity for NH3 based on H+), confirming that N2RR catalysis with Ru is viable. Related tripodal, tetra(phosphine) Ru0-N2 complexes have not yet shown selective reactivity at the coordinated N2 ligand; the weak acids canvassed (e.g., 2,6-lutidininm tetrafluoroborate) tend to react at the metal center to yield oxidized [RuII(N2)(H)]+ products, whereas stronger acids (e.g., HCl, HOTf) have been shown to protonate at the phosphine ligand.16
Table 1.
N2-to-NH3 Conversion Mediated by [M]-N2− Complexesa
| catalyst | acid (equiv) | reductant (equiv) | NH3/M (equiv) | Yield NH3/H+(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Os]-N2− | 46c | 50d | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 10 ± 2 |
| 2b | [Fe]-N2− | 46c | 50d | 0.8 ±0.5 | 4.7 ±2.9 |
| 3 | [Ru]-N2− | 46c | 50d | 4.3 ±0.3 | 28 ±2 |
| 4 | [Fe]-N2− | 46e | 50f | 1.4 ±0.3 | 9.3 ±1.8 |
| 5 | [Ru]-N2− | 46e | 50f | 0.8 ±0.5 | 4.9 ±3.5 |
| 6 | [Os]-N2− | 46e | 50f | 7.1 ±0.6 | 46 ±4 |
| 7 | [Os]-N2− | 150e | 180f | 18 ± 1 | 35 ± 1 |
| 8 | [Os]-N2− | 500e | 600f | 50 ±3 | 30 ±2 |
| 9 | [Os]-N2− | 800e | 960f | 86 ±5 | 32 ±2 |
| 10 | [Os]-N2− | 1500e | 1800f | 120 ±11 | 24 ±2 |
| 11 | [Os]-N2− | 46g | 50f | 7.9 ±0.3 | 52 ±2 |
| 12 | [Os]-N2− | 46h | 50f | 7.9 | 52 |
| 13 | [Os]-N2− | 46i | 50f | 6.3 ±0.5 | 41 ±3 |
| 14 | [Os]-N2− | 46j | 50f | 0.1 ±0.1 | 0.8 ±0.2 |
| 15 | [Os]-N2− | 46k | 50f | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 7.6 ±0.8 |
| 16 | [Os]-N2− | 46l | 50f | 0.7 ±0.1 | 4.6 ±0.7 |
aThe catalyst, acid, reductant, and Et2O were sealed in a Schlenk tube at −196°C under an N2 atmosphere, wanned to −78 °C and stirred. For runs utilizing HBArF4, reactions were stirred at −78 °C for 1 hour, followed by stirring at room temperature for 45 minutes. For all other runs, reactions were allowed to stir and gradually warm to room temperature overnight. See Supporting Information for individual experiments.
bFrom ref. 2a.
cHBArF4.
dKC8.
e[H2NPh2][OTf|.
fCp*2Co.
g[H3NPh][OTf].
h[H3N-2,5- Cl2C6H3][OTf].
i[N-Me-H2NPh] [OTf]
j[H2NPh2] [BArF4].
k[H3NPh][BArF4].
lHOTf
With these results in hand, we next canvassed milder reagents.2f,17 These reactions highlight the far superior N2RR activity of [Os]-N2− by comparison to either [Ru]-N2− or [Fe]-N2−. Thus, treatment of a suspension of [Os]-N2− in Et2O at −78 °C with 46 equiv of [H2NPh2][OTf| and 50 equiv of Cp*2Co results in the generation of 7.1 ± 0.6 equiv of NH3 per Os (Table 1, entry 6; 46% based on acid). An identical catalytic run performed under an 14N2 atmosphere using [H215NPh2][OTf] yields only [14NH4][Cl], confirming that the NH3 formed is derived from the N2 atmosphere. Attempts to use either[(η6-C6H6)Os(C1)(µ-C1)]2 or [Os]-Cl as the (pre)catalyst generates only < 0.1 and 2.5 equiv of NH3, respectively, underscoring a privileged role for [Os]-N2− as the catalyst. For comparison, [Fe]-N2−, whose [Fe]-N2[0/1-] redox couple (−2.2 V vs Fc/Fc+) is shifted ~220 mV cathodically from that of Cp*2Co/Cp*2Co+,18 generates only stoichiometric quantities of NH3 under analogous conditions (entry 4); likewise [Ru]-N2− (E = - 2.14 V vs Fc/Fc+, Figure 1 )14a shows very poor N2RR performance (0.8 ± 0.5 equiv of NH3; entry 5).
Os-catalyzed N2RR was found to proceed in the presence of correspondingly weaker and stronger anilinium acids with unperturbed yields forNH3 production. For example, replacing [H2NPh2][OTf] with either [H3NPh][OTf] or [H3N-2,5-Cl2C6H3][OTf] affords 7.9 equiv of NH3 per Os, respectively (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). [N- Me-H2NPh][OTf] gives a slightly diminished yield (6.3 ± 0.5 equiv of NH3 per Os; entry 13). These observations contrast the behavior of P3BFe-N2−, where the selectivity for N2RR (vs HER) is substantially diminished when using [H3NPh][OTf] compared to [H2NPh2][OTf|.2f
Attempts to replace Cp*2Co with weaker metallocene reductants, such as cobaltocene (Cp2Co) or decamethylchromocene (Cp*2Cr), did not yield any detectable NH3. Similarly, the Et2O soluble acids [H2NPh2][BArF4] and [H3NPh][BArF4] furnished much lower yields of NH3 relative to their triflate counterparts (Table 1, entries 14 and 15), presumably due to increasing the background HER and possibly promoting catalyst deactivation (vide infra). Ether-miscible HOTf displays similar behavior (entry 16).
To explore the effect of increasing the acid/reductant loading with [Os]-N2− , we tested 150 equiv of [H2NPh2][OTf] and 180 equiv of Cp*2Co and detected 18 ± 1 equiv of NH3 per Os (Table 1, entry 7), only a modestly diminished yield (35% based on H+) relative to the lower loading.Increasing the substrate loading leads to further increases in the total yield of NH3, again with rather little impact on overall efficiency for NH3 with respect to acid (Table 1, entries 8 and 9). Re-loading an 800 equiv acid run after stirring for 3 hours at −78 °C (1600 equiv total) affords a total of 122 equiv of NH3, suggesting a substantial amount of active catalyst is still present at the end of the first run.
In a single run at the highest loading tested, 1500 equiv of [H2NPh2][OTf] and 1800 equiv of Cp*2Co, a yield of 120 ± 11 equiv of NH3 per Os (24 ± 2% for NH3; entry 10) is observed. This total turnover number exceeds that of previously reported Fe catalysts, regardless of protocol,19 and also exceeds TON data for most Mo catalysts.1 Noteworthy exceptions concern recent Mo catalysts supported by pincer-phosphine ligands, which have been shown to be both very active and selective for NH3 generation under certain conditions.1d,f
For a direct single-run comparison under the present conditions, we tested the best known Fe catalyst, [Na(12-crown-4)2][P3BFe- N2],2d,f at 1500 equiv of [H2NPh2][OTf] and 1800 equiv of Cp*2Co; only 22 ± 5 equiv of NH3 is produced (average of two runs). This P3BFe-N2− catalyst performs more efficiently than [Os]-N2− at lower substrate loading, however.2f The single-run TON value for [Os]-N2− is hence noteworthy, despite its modest selectivity for NH3 relative to H2 overall.
With respect to formation of inactive osmium hydrides, we comment for comparison that [Fe]-N2− reacts with stoichiometric acid (e.g., HBArF4) to liberate 0.5 equiv of H2 and its one-electron oxidized derivative, [Fe]-N2, presumably via a diazenido intermediate, [Fe]-N=NH, that releases H2 bimolecularly;20 none of the thermally stable, and catalytically inactive, hydride product, [Fe](N2)(H),21 is observed. By contrast, exposing [Os]-N2− to stoichiometric HBArF4 in THF-d8 solution at −78 °C affords a mixture of the hydride products [Os](N2)(H) (major) and [Os]H3 (minor), as determined by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy (Scheme 1).22 On wanning, [Os]-N2 is also observed as a byproduct.
Scheme 1.
Synthesis of Os-hydride and Os-hydrazido(2-) Complexes
[Os]H3 can be synthesized independently by reacting [Os]-Cl with LiEt3BH, or by exposing either [Os](N2)(H) or [Os]-N2 to an atmosphere of H2 (Scheme 1). Subjecting [Os](N2)(H) or [Os]H3 to 46 equiv of acid (HBArF4 or [H2NPh2][OTf]) and 50 equiv of reductant (KC8 or Cp*2Co; 1 atmN2, Et2O, −78 °C) does not furnish any detectable NH3. Examination of the Os speciation after treatment of [Os] -N2− with 10 equiv of acid and 12 equiv of reductant reveals [Os](N2)(H) (HBArF4/KC8: 32%; [H2NPh2][OTf]/Cp*2Co: 0%) and [Os]H3 (HBArF4/KC8: 48%; [H2NPh2][OTf]/Cp*2Co:62%) as the only observable products by NMR and IR spectroscopies, providing strong evidence that these inactive Os-hydride species form during catalytic reactions. For the P3BFe-N2− catalyst system using [H2NPh2][OTf]/Cp*2Co, off-path hydrides are not observed;2f they are observed, however, when using HBArF4/KC8.2d
We hypothesized that access to zero-valent [Os]-N2− is critical for productive N2 functionalization, presumably proceeding via an initial [Os]-N=NH intermediate formed via the first protonation step. The [Os]-N2[0/1-] redox couple is −1.94 V (vs Fc/Fc+, Figure 1 ),14a suggesting that Cp*2Co should be a sufficiently strong reductant to (re)generate the [Os]-N2− state during catalysis. By analogy, access to anionic P3EFe-N2− (E = B, C, Si) states has been shown to be chemically and electrochemically correlated with N2RR catalysis.2d,f Invoking [Os]-N2− as “on-path” for catalysis helps rationalize the poor N2− to-NH3 conversion exhibited by the osmium catalyst when Cp*2Co is replaced by either Cp2Co (E = −1.33 vs Fc/Fc+, THF) or Cp*2Cr (E = −1.55 vs Fc/Fc+, THF); these reagents are not sufficiently reducing to regenerate [Os]-N2−.
To gauge whether Cp*2Co can competently reduce [Os]-N2 to generate [Os]-N2−, a green Et2O solution of [Os]-N2 was treated with 5 equiv of Cp*2Co at room temperature. Surprisingly, analysis of the reaction mixture by 31P NMR and IR spectroscopies, monitoring over several hours with vigorous stirring, shows none of the expected [Os]-N2− species.
An analogous experiment, performed in THF-rfs and monitored by *H and d8 NMR spectroscopies at room temperature, shows only unreacted [Os]-N2 and Cp*2Co. However, upon cooling this mixture to −78 °C, resonances consistent with the formation of [Os]-N2− appear.23 Accordingly, a color change from green-brown to red is observed within seconds, indicating a temperature-dependent redox process. This is conveniently monitored as a function of temperature by optical spectroscopy; a gradual decrease in the absorption bands at λ = 670 nm and λ = 1000 nm corresponding to [Os]-N2 is observed, with a simultaneous increase in a feature attributable to [Os]-N2− near λ = 550 nm (Figure 2, left). This reaction mixture can be wanned and re-cooled multiple times, confirming a temperature-dependent redox equilibrium.
Figure 2.
Left: UV-visible absorbance spectra for the reaction of [Os]-N2 (1.2 mM) and 5 equiv of Cp*2Co (6.0 mM) in THF at the listed temperature. Arrows represent the direction of change when the temperature is lowered. Right: XRD structure of {[Os]=NNH2} {OTf} with thermal ellipsoids set at 50% probability. Hydrogen atoms (except for N-H’s) are omitted for clarity.
We conclude that, at the catalytically relevant temperature of - 78 °C, Cp*2Co is sufficiently capable of reducing [Os]-N2 to [Os]-N2−. The VT optical data suggest that an observable population of [Os]-N2− can be generated at temperatures as high as −40 °C. Accordingly, a catalytic run carried-out at −40 °C (46 equiv [H2NPh2][OTf] and 50 equiv Cp*2Co) produces 6.2 equiv NH3.24 By contrast, it appears that neither [Ru]-N2− nor [Fe]-N2− can be competently generated using Cp*2Co, helping explain their comparatively poor performance.
Having established the viability of an initial ET step to generate [Os]-N2−, we next probed its reactivity with protons. Tripodal tris(phosphine) hydrazido P3EFe=NNH2+ complexes have been spectroscopically (E = B)15a and structurally characterized (E = Si),15b generated via double protonation of P3EFe-N2− at low temperature. Similarly, reaction of [Os]-N2− with 3 equiv of HOTf in thawing 2-MeTHF (−135 °C) produces an orange mixture, from which pale orange {[Os]=NNH2} {OTf} can be isolated upon precipitation (Scheme 1). Spectroscopic features of this diamagnetic hydrazido complex include a broad v(NH) stretch centered at 3232 cm-1 and a diagnostic 1H NMR resonance (THF-d8) at δ = 10.0 ppm. For comparison, the related resonance for {[Fe]=NNH2} {OTfj is at 9.5 ppm.15b
X-ray diffraction analysis of {[Os]=NNH2} {OTf} locates two protons bound to the sp2-hy bridized β N-atom (N2) with H-bonding to the triflate anion (Figure 2, right). The Os-N-NH2 unit is linear (∠ (Os-N1-N2) = 176°), the N1-N2 distance is 1.271(5) Å, and the Os-N1 distance is short (1.815(3) Å), in accord with a hydrazido(2-) featuring substantial Os-N multiple bond character. The Os-N and N-N distances in [Os] =NNH2+ are within the range observed for previous structurally characterized linear and bent hydrazido(2-) complexes of osmium,25 prepared by trapping OsIV-imido intermediates26 or by the reaction between Os-nitride complexes with secondary ammines.27 A related osmium-imide complex prepared by our lab, [Os]=N-Ar (Ar = p-trifluoro- methylphenyl),14a displays remarkably similar structural parameters to [Os]=NNH2+, including comparable Os-N bond lengths, Os-P bond lengths, and degrees of pyramidalization at the Si and Os atoms (see Table S1). [Os]=NNH2+ represents the first instance of an OS-N2 species to be converted to a protonated Os-NxHy product.
To assess the possible intermediacy of [Os]=NNH2+ in the Os- mediated N2RR catalysis described herein, [Os]=NNH2+ was treated with 46 equiv of [H2NPh2] [OTf] and 50 equiv of Cp*2Co at low temperature, generating greater-than-stoichiometric quantities of NH3 (ca. 2.6 equiv; no hydrazine detected). [Os]=NNH2+ and its one-electron reduced state, [Os] =NNH2, should be active toward bimolecular proton-coupled-electron-transfer (PCET) steps to generate inactive hydrides (or competing H2) owing to very weak N-H bonds.2f,15c,20 Such reactivity likely explains the poor catalytic performance of isolated [Os]=NNH2+; catalysis is likely to be more efficient when such hydrazido species are formed in lower concentration in situ during catalysis. Combined with the observation that Cp*2Co can reduce [Os]-N2 to [Os]-N2− at low temperature, and that [Os]-N2−can be protonated to yield [Os]=NNH2+, the observation that [Os] =NNH2+ can facilitate NH3 formation lends support to an ET-PT N2RR pathway that proceeds, initially at least, via a distal pathway.
To conclude, we have shown for the first time that both Ru and Os coordination complexes can serve as catalysts for N2RR in the presence of reductant and acid sources under ambient pressure at low temperature. The tris(phosphine)silyl Os system is most active, displaying high turnover at high loadings of Cp*2Co and [H2NPh2][OTf]. Access to zero-valent [Os]-N2− appears to be critical for N2 functionalization, and a bona fide [Os]=NNH2+ hydrazido complex can be generated via protonation of [Os]-N2− and is shown to facilitate NH3 generation; [Os]=NNH2+ is hence a plausible intermediate. Os-hydrides, including [Os](N2)(H) and [Os]H3, form during the catalysis as catalytically inactive states. That a tris(phosphine)silyl ligand proves so effective for osmium-mediated N2RR catalysis, but is largely ineffective for the isostructural [Fe]-N2− and [Ru]-N2− systems using Cp*2Co and [H2NPh2][OTf], underscores the value in comparatively exploring highly related systems for N2RR. In this case, the key [Os]-N2[0/1-] redox couple is accessible with Cp*2Co, but only at low temperature, whereas a stronger reductant is needed to drive the [Fe]-N2[0/1-] and [Ru]~ N2[0/1-] reductions. While other factors are most certainly at play, access to M-N2− states is emerging as a common theme for N2RR catalysis by group VIII metals.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the NIH (GM070757) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. We thank Dr. Michael K. Takase and Lairy Henling for crystallographic assistance. J.F.J. acknowledges the support of the NSF for a Graduate Fellowship (GRFP).
Footnotes
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.
Synthetic and spectroscopic details:
Crystallographic information:
References
- 1.For representative examples of synthetic Mo catalysts for N2RR see: (a) Yandulov DV; Schrock RR Science 2003, 301, 76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Arashiba K; Miyake Y; Nishibayashi Y Not. Chem 2011, 3, 120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Arashiba K; Kinoshita E; Kuriyama S; Eizawa A; Nakajima K; Tanaka H; Yoshizawa K; Nishibayashi Y J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 5666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Eizawa A; Arashiba K; Tanaka H; Kuriyama S; Matsuo Y; Nakajima K; Yoshizawa K; Nishibayashi Y Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 14874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Wickramasinghe LA; Ogawa T; Schrock RR; Muller P J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017,139, 9132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Arashiba K; Eizawa A; Tanaka H; Nakajima K; Yoshizawa K; Nishibayashi Y Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn 2017, 90, 1111. [Google Scholar]
- 2.For representative examples of synthetic Fe catalysts for N2RR see: (a) Anderson JS; Rittle J; Peters JC Nature 2013, 501, 84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Creutz SE; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Ung G; Peters JC Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Del Castillo TJ; Thompson NB; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 5341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Kuriyama S; Arashiba K; Nakajima K; Matsuo Y; Tanaka H; Ishii K; Yoshizawa K; Nishibayashi Y Nat. Commun 2016, 7, 12181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Chalkley MJ; Del Castillo TJ; Matson BD; Roddy JP; Peters JC ACS Cent. Sci 2017, 3, 217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.(a) Howard JB; Rees DC Chem. Rev 1996, 96, 2965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rittle J; Peters JC Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 2013,110,15898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) MacLeod KC; Holland PL Nat. Chem 2013, 5, 559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Hoffman BM; Lukoyanov D; Yang Z-Y; Dean DR; Seefeldt LC Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 4041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.For cobalt complexes that catalyze N2RR see: (a) Del Castillo TJ; Thompson NB; Suess DLM; Ung G; Peters JC Inorg. Chem 2015, 54, 9256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kuriyama S; Arashiba K; Tanaka H; Matsuo Y; Nakajima K; Yoshizawa K; Nishibayashi Y Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 14291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.(a) Maxwell GR Synthetic Nitrogen Products A Practical Guide to the Products and Processes; Springer: Boston (MA: ), 2005. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tanabe Y; Nishibayashi Y Coord. Chem. Rev 2013, 257, 2551. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Allen AD; Senoff CV Chem. Commun. 1965, 621. [Google Scholar]
- 7.For select Os examples see: (a) Buhr JD; Taube H Inorg. Chem 1979, 18, 2208. [Google Scholar]; (b) Che C-M; Lam H-W; Tong W-F; Lai T-F; Lau T-C J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1989, 1883. [Google Scholar]; (c) Ware DC; Taube H Inorg. Chem 1991, 30, 4605. [Google Scholar]; (d) Demadis KD; Meyer TJ; White PS Inorg. Chem 1997, 36, 5678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.For a Ru example see: (a) Man W-L; Tang T-M; Wong T-W; Lau T-C; Peng S-M; Wong W-T J. Am. Chem. Soc 2004,126, 478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; For a recent review see: (b) Man W-L; Lam WWY; Lau T-C Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kunkely H; Vogler A Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.(a) Pipes DW; Bakir M; Vitols SE; Hodgson DJ; Meyer TJ J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990,112, 5507. [Google Scholar]; (b) Schendzielorz FS; Finger M; Volkmann C; Wurtele C; Schneider S Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 11417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lindley BM; Bruch QJ; White PS; Hasanayn F; Miller AJM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 5305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.(a) Collman JP; Hutchison JE; Lopez MA; Guilard R; Reed RA J. Am. Chem. Soc 1991,113, 2794. [Google Scholar]; (b) Collman JP; Hutchison JE; Ennis MS; Lopez MA; Guilard R J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114, 8074. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Khoenkhoen N; de Bruin B; Reek JNH; Dzik WI Eur. J. Inorg. Chem 2015, 2015, 567. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zero-valent Ru and Os systems have been known for decades when stabilized by /r-acidic ligands. For early examples see: (a) Abel EWQ Rev., Chem. Soc 1963, 17, 133. [Google Scholar]; (b)Collman JP; Roper WR J. Am. Chem. Soc 1965, 87, 4008. [Google Scholar]; (c) Collman JP; Roper WR J. Am. Chem. Soc 1966, 88, 3504. [Google Scholar]
- 14.For relevant literature see: (a) Takaoka A; Gerber LCH; Peters JC Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 4088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Poli R Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2011, 50, 43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Yang X; Gianetti TL; Harbort J; Worle MD; Tan L; Su C-Y; Jurt P; Harmer JR; Grutzmacher H Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016,55,11999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Bianchini C; Laschi F; Peruzzini M; Zanello P Gazz. Chim. Ital 1994, 124, 271. [Google Scholar]; (e) Angelici RJ; Zhu B; Fedi S; Laschi F; Zanello P Inorg. Chem 2007, 46, 10901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.(a) Anderson JS; Cutsail GE; Rittle J; Connor BA; Gunderson WA; Zhang L; Hoffman BM; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 7803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rittle J; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 4243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Matson BD; Peters JC ACS Catal, 2017, submitted. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.(a) Field LD; Guest RW; Vuong KQ; Dalgarno SJ; Jensen P Inorg. Chem 2009, 48, 2246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gilbert-Wilson R; Field LD; Colbran SB; Bhadbhade MM Inorg. Chem 2013,52, 3043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.For Fe-mediated catalytic N2− to-N2H4 conversion using Cp*2Co and [H2NPh2][OTf] see: Hill PJ; Doyle LR; Crawford AD; Myers WK; Ashley AE J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 13521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lee Y; Mankad NP; Peters JC Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Buscagan TM; Oyala PH; Peters JC Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 6921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rittle J; Peters JC J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 3161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fong H; Moret ME; Lee Y; Peters JC Organometallics 2013, 32, 3053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.[Ru](N2)(H) and [Ru]H3 form as catalytically inactive species in the corresponding Ru-system. See SI for details.
- 23.Analogous experiments produce none of either [Ru]-N2− or [Fe]-N2−, as probed by 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopies.
- 24.The generation of [Os]-N2− during catalysis does not preclude the possibility of productive PCET pathways.2f
- 25.Coia GM; White PS; Meyer TJ; Wink DA; Keefer LK; Davis WM J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 3649. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coia GM; Devenney M; White PS; Meyer TJ; Wink DA Inorg. Chem 1997, 36, 2341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Huynh MHV; El-Samanody E-S; Demadis KD; Meyer TJ; White PS J. Am. Chem. Soc 1999, 121, 1403. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



