Abstract
In this paper, we give asymptotic expansions and inequalities related to the generalized Somos quadratic recurrence constant, using its relation with the generalized Euler constant.
Keywords: Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant, Inequality, Asymptotic expansion, Generalized Euler constant
Introduction
Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant is defined (see [1–3]) by
| 1.1 |
or
| 1.2 |
The constant σ arises in the study of the asymptotic behavior of the sequence
| 1.3 |
with the first few terms
This sequence behaves as follows (see [4, p. 446] and [3, 5]):
| 1.4 |
The constant σ appears in important problems from pure and applied analysis, and it is the motivation for a large number of research papers (see, for example, [1, 6–16]).
Sondow and Hadjicostas [15] introduced and studied the generalized-Euler-constant function , defined by
| 1.5 |
where the series converges when . Pilehrood and Pilehrood [13] considered the function (). The function generalizes both Euler’s constant and the alternating Euler constant [17, 18].
Sondow and Hadjicostas [15] defined the generalized Somos constant
| 1.6 |
Coffey [19] gave the integral and series representations for :
| 1.7 |
and
| 1.8 |
in terms of the polylogarithm function.
It is known (see [15]) that
| 1.9 |
Thus, formula (1.5) is closely related to Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant σ.
Define
Mortici [11] proved that for ,
| 1.10 |
and
| 1.11 |
Lu and Song [10] improved Mortici’s results and obtained the inequalities:
| 1.12 |
and
| 1.13 |
for .
You and Chen [16] further improved inequalities (1.10)–(1.13). Recently, Chen and Han [7] gave new bounds for :
| 1.14 |
for , and presented the following asymptotic expansion:
| 1.15 |
as . Moreover, these authors gave a formula for successively determining the coefficients in (1.15).
Chen and Han [7] pointed out that the lower bound in (1.14) is for sharper than the one in (1.12), and the upper bound in (1.14) is for sharper than the one in (1.12),
For any positive integer , in this paper we give the asymptotic expansion of as . Based on the result obtained, we establish the inequality for . We also consider the asymptotic expansion for .
Lemmas
Lemma 2.1
As ,
| 2.1 |
where is defined by
| 2.2 |
with the coefficients given by the recurrence relation
| 2.3 |
Here, and throughout this paper, an empty sum is understood to be zero.
Proof
Using the Maclaurin series of ,
we obtain
| 2.4 |
In view of (2.4), we can let
| 2.5 |
where are real numbers to be determined.
Write (2.5) as
| 2.6 |
Direct computation yields
| 2.7 |
It follows from (2.4), (2.6), and (2.7) that
| 2.8 |
Equating coefficients of the term on both sides of (2.8) yields
| 2.9 |
For , we obtain , and for , we have
We then obtain the recursive formula
which can be written as (2.3). The proof of Lemma 2.1 is complete. □
Lemma 2.2
Let
| 2.10 |
Then, for ,
| 2.11 |
Proof
It is well known that for and ,
which implies that for and ,
| 2.12 |
Using (2.12), we find that
and
The proof of Lemma 2.2 is complete. □
Remark 2.1
Using the methods from [20–22] it is possible to get estimations (based on the power series expansions) of the logarithm function that can be used, for example, in the analysis of parameterized Euler-constant function, which will be an item for further work.
Lemma 2.3
As , we have
| 2.13 |
where is defined by
| 2.14 |
with the coefficients given by the recurrence relation
| 2.15 |
Proof
In view of (2.4), we can let
| 2.16 |
where are real numbers to be determined. Write (2.16) as
Noting that (2.7) holds, we have
| 2.17 |
Equating coefficients of the term on both sides of (2.17) yields
For , we obtain , and for we have
We then obtain the recursive formula (2.15). The proof of Lemma 2.3 is complete. □
The first few coefficients are
Main results
For any positive integer , Theorem 3.1 gives the asymptotic expansion of as .
Theorem 3.1
For any positive integer , we have
| 3.1 |
where is given in (2.2). Namely,
| 3.2 |
Proof
Write (2.1) as
| 3.3 |
where
| 3.4 |
with the coefficients given by the recurrence relation (2.3). From (3.3), we have
| 3.5 |
Adding (3.5) from to , we have
which can be written as (3.1). The proof of Theorem 3.1 is complete. □
Remark 3.1
For in (3.2), we obtain (1.15). For in (3.2), we find
| 3.6 |
For in (3.2), we find
| 3.7 |
Theorem 3.2
For ,
| 3.8 |
Proof
From the double inequality (2.11), we have
| 3.9 |
where and are given in (2.10). Adding inequalities (3.9) from to , we have
which can be written as (3.8). The proof of Theorem 3.2 is complete. □
Remark 3.2
Inequality (3.8) can be further refined by inserting additional terms on both sides of the inequality. For example, for , we have
| 3.10 |
Remark 3.3
Following the same method as the one used in the proof of Theorem 3.2, we can prove the following inequality:
| 3.11 |
for . We omit the proof.
In view of (1.14), (3.11), (3.8), and (3.10), we pose the following conjecture.
Conjecture 3.1
For any positive integer , we have
| 3.12 |
with the coefficients given in (2.3).
By using the Maple software, we find, as ,
| 3.13 |
| 3.14 |
and
| 3.15 |
From a computational viewpoint, formulas (3.13), (3.14), and (3.15) improve formulas (1.15), (3.6), and (3.7), respectively.
For any positive integer , we here provide a pair of recurrence relations for determining the constants and (see Remark 3.4) such that
| 3.16 |
as . This develops formulas (3.13), (3.14), and (3.15) to produce a general result given by Theorem 3.3.
Theorem 3.3
For any positive integer , we have
| 3.17 |
as , where and are given by a pair of recurrence relations
| 3.18 |
and
| 3.19 |
with
Here are given in (2.3).
Proof
In view of (3.13), (3.14), and (3.15), we let
where and are real numbers to be determined. This can be written as
| 3.20 |
Direct computation yields
which can be written as
| 3.21 |
Substituting (3.21) into (3.20) we have
| 3.22 |
On the other hand, it follows from (3.1) that
| 3.23 |
Equating coefficients of the term on the right-hand sides of (3.22) and (3.23), we obtain
| 3.24 |
Setting and in (3.24), respectively, yields
| 3.25 |
and
| 3.26 |
For , from (3.25) and (3.26) we obtain
and for we have
and
We then obtain the recurrence relations (3.18) and (3.19). The proof of Theorem 3.3 is complete. □
Here we give explicit numerical values of some first terms of and by using formulas (3.18) and (3.19). This shows how easily we can determine the constants and in (3.17).
Remark 3.4
The constants and in (3.16) are given by
Setting , and 4 in (3.16), respectively, yields (3.13), (3.14), and (3.15).
Noting that holds, Theorem 3.4 presents the asymptotic expansion for .
Theorem 3.4
As , we have
| 3.27 |
where is given in (2.14). Namely,
| 3.28 |
Proof
Write (2.13) as
| 3.29 |
where
| 3.30 |
with the coefficients given by the recurrence relation (2.15).
From (3.29), we have
| 3.31 |
Adding (3.31) from to , we have
| 3.32 |
which can be written as (3.27). The proof of Theorem 3.4 is complete. □
Remark 3.5
We see from (3.28) that the alternating Euler constant has the following expansion:
| 3.33 |
Conclusions
In this paper, we give asymptotic expansions related to the generalized Somos quadratic recurrence constant (Theorems 3.1 and 3.3). We present the inequalities for and (see (3.8), (3.10), and (3.11)). The expansion of the alternating Euler constant is also obtained (see (3.33)).
Acknowledgements
We thank the editor and referees for their careful reading and valuable suggestions to make the article reader friendly.
Authors’ contributions
Both authors contributed equally to this work. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Xue-Si Ma, Email: hpumxs@sina.com.
Chao-Ping Chen, Email: chenchaoping@sohu.com.
References
- 1.Guillera J., Sondow J. Double integrals and infinite products for some classical constants via analytic continuations of Lerch’s transcendent. Ramanujan J. 2008;16:247–270. doi: 10.1007/s11139-007-9102-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ramanujan S. In: Collected Papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan. Hardy G.H., Aiyar P.V.S., Wilson B.M., editors. Providence: Am. Math. Soc.; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Sloane, N.J.A.: Sequences A116603. In: The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. http://oeis.org/A116603
- 4.Finch S.R. Mathematical Constants. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Weisstein, E.W.: Somos’s quadratic recurrence constant. In: MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. Published electronically at http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SomossQuadraticRecurrenceConstant.html
- 6.Chen C.P. New asymptotic expansions related to Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I. 2013;351:9–12. doi: 10.1016/j.crma.2013.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen C.P., Han X.F. On Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. J. Number Theory. 2016;166:31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2016.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hirschhorn M.D. A note on Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. J. Number Theory. 2011;131:2061–2063. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2011.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lampret V. Approximation of Sondow’s generalized-Euler-constant function on the interval Ann. Univ. Ferrara. 2010;56:65–76. doi: 10.1007/s11565-009-0089-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lu D., Song Z. Some new continued fraction estimates of the Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. J. Number Theory. 2015;155:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2015.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mortici C. Estimating the Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. J. Number Theory. 2010;130:2650–2657. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2010.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nemes G. On the coefficients of an asymptotic expansion related to Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. Appl. Anal. Discrete Math. 2011;5:60–66. doi: 10.2298/AADM101115029N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pilehrood K.H., Pilehrood T.H. Arithmetical properties of some series with logarithmic coefficients. Math. Z. 2007;255:117–131. doi: 10.1007/s00209-006-0015-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pilehrood K.H., Pilehrood T.H. Vacca-type series for values of the generalized Euler constant function and its derivative. J. Integer Seq. 2010;13:10.7.3. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sondow J., Hadjicostas P. The generalized-Euler-constant function and a generalization of Somos’s quadratic recurrence constant. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2007;332:292–314. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.09.081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.You X., Chen D.R. Improved continued fraction sequence convergent to the Somos’ quadratic recurrence constant. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016;436:513–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.12.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sondow J. Double integrals for Euler’s constant and and an analog of Hadjicostas’s formula. Am. Math. Mon. 2005;112:61–65. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sondow J. Additive Number Theory. New York: Springer; 2010. New Vacca-type rational series for Euler’s constant and its “alternating” analog pp. 331–340. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coffey M.W. Integral representations of functions and Addison-type series for mathematical constants. J. Number Theory. 2015;157:79–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jnt.2015.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lutovac, T., Malesevic, B., Rasajski, M.: A new method for proving some inequalities related to several special functions (2018). arXiv:1802.02082
- 21.Malesevic B., Lutovac T., Rasajski M., Mortici C. Extensions of the natural approach to refinements and generalizations of some trigonometric inequalities. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2018;2018:90. doi: 10.1186/s13662-018-1545-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Malesevic B., Rasajski M., Lutovac T. Refinements and generalizations of some inequalities of Shafer-Fink’s type for the inverse sine function. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017;2017:275. doi: 10.1186/s13660-017-1554-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
