Skip to main content
3 Biotech logoLink to 3 Biotech
. 2018 Jun 25;8(7):289. doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1312-1

Variants in MEF2A gene in relation with coronary artery disease in Saudi population

Seema Zargar 1,, Abdulaziz A Aljafari 1, Tanveer A Wani 2
PMCID: PMC6020100  PMID: 29963349

Abstract

This study investigated the association of variants in myocyte enhancer factor 2A (MEF2A) gene with coronary artery disease (CAD) via case control study on Saudi population. Several studies have indicated a high expression of MEF2A in the human coronary endothelium. The entire (exon 11 putative susceptibility exon) of MEF2A gene was sequenced using direct DNA sequencing method in 120 sporadic patients and 100 controls. Total number of variants were identified and crude odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. In total, three variants were identified, namely, CAG repeats, AGC deletion, and SNP rs: 325400. No significant link was observed between the common (CAG)n polymorphism, AGC deletion, and CAD risk as reported in other populations, but interestingly, rs325400 (G1323T) in Saudis was found to be associated with the CAD with odds ratio 2.0102 (CI = 1.3405–3.0146) and significance of p = 0.00048. None of Saudi subjects (normal as well as diseased) showed 21-bp deletion as reported previously for other populations. In addition, genotype TT of rs325400 is associated with significantly higher levels of LDL-C and lower level of HDL-C. Among the quantitative parameters, lower HDL-C and higher LDL-C was found to be associated with disease. We report that MEF2A gene based on SNP rs325400 (G1323T) can be considered as a susceptibility factor for CAD and presence of T allele makes Saudis at more risk to CAD, while other variants detected in this gene do not have any association in Saudi population.

Keywords: Coronary artery disease, MEF2A gene, Saudi population, rs: 325400, (CAG)n polymorphism

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the complex diseases, the incidence of which is attributable to lifestyle, environment, and genetics. In spite of great efforts to determine the genetic and molecular contributing factors that could account for variations in CAD, the etiology and the complex multigenic basis of atherosclerosis and MI is still not completely identified. MEF2A codes for one of the members of transcription factors of myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) family and plays an important role in certain biological functions (Wang et al. 2018; Scheuner 2003). There is high expression of MEF2A in dysfunctional endothelium that in turn contributes to atherogenesis. MEF2 family also has been closely linked with important signaling pathways that include Ca2+, MAP kinase, Wnt and PI3K/Akt signaling, etc (Chen et al. 2017). MEF2A is reported as a strong candidate gene among other 93 genes of MEF2 family, because it is mRNA has been detected in blood vessels of mouse during early embryogenesis (Yamada et al. 2008). Furthermore, early MEF2A protein expression was seen on day 8.5 after reproduction in the embryonic cells and hence, behaving as an early marker in these cells. In addition, the MEF2A (reference sequence NM_005920.2) expression pattern was reported to be similar to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), an endothelial cell marker, in endothelial cell precursors (Bhagavatula et al. 2004). This suggests MEF2A gene’s possible role as early vasculogenesis marker and hence can be a potential candidate to evaluate its association in controlling CAD. The genomic sequence of MEF2A gene is very variable and, therefore, is interesting to explore as the sequence variations have functional importance to affect the gene expression. MEF2A gene consists of 11 exons and 10 introns. The exon 11 is claimed as the most polymorphic locus harboring various substitution and insertion/deletion (indel) polymorphisms such as a common variant (CAG)n polymorphism (González et al. 2006; Han et al. 2007). A 21 bp coding sequence deletion leading to 7-aminoacid deletion in exon 11 of this gene in Scandinavian family was reported to be a causative mutation in single large CAD positive family (Liu et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2005). Furthermore, in vitro experiments have shown a disruption in the nuclear localization and decreased MEF2A-induced transcriptional activation post 21-bp deletion of the mature protein. Thus this genetic defect could produce defect in vascular endothelium that may originate atherosclerotic plaque or thrombosis and influence the whole process of atherogenesis (Wang and Anderson 2015). Since 21-bp deletion was recognized specifically in CAD family having an autosomal dominance and no other familial studies or genetic linkage analysis was done in this specific context so far, the molecular case–control association studies of samples belonging to same region without having relation to each other has become the alternative strategy for such studies. Many case control studies have claimed exon 11 of MEF2A gene as the most variant locus occupying various insertion/deletion (indel), substitution and (CAG)n polymorphisms, the results, however, are in consistent (González et al. 2006; Han et al. 2007; Elhawari et al. 2010; Hsu et al. 2010; Dai et al. 2010;  Wang et al. 2005; Guella et al. 2009). Therefore, whether MEF2A is a CAD causing gene or simply the findings are incidental remains controversial (Scacchi et al. 2011; Kajimotoet al. 2005). Therefore, this study evaluated all the possible variants of exon 11, the highly variable and susceptible region of MEF2A gene by direct sequencing, in 120 Saudi CAD patients against 100 normal control subjects of same region. Direct sequencing of exon 11 of MEF2A gene, was done to assess the possible variations in study population that could lead to individual’s susceptibility to CAD.

Materials and methods

Study was hospital based case control study. Subjects were obtained from King Saud University hospital after informed written consent. The study was conducted after the approval of the Ethics Committee of King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) and. Informed written consent was obtained from all participant subjects prior to start of study.

Selection criteria and data collection

This study included 120 clinically confirmed cases of CAD patients (68 males and 52 females) and 100 healthy controls. The patients and controls were interviewed using a questionnaire and the data collected included the epidemiological/demographic details, any disease history, addiction history (smoking or alcohol) and familial history of MI or CAD. The ECG and coronary angiographic studies of the subjects were collected and studied. The other relevant clinical laboratory parameters were also evaluated. The genetic analysis was carried on 120 CAD patients who gave a written consent to participate and provided blood samples.

Determination of risk factors

Following definitions were used for coronary artery disease risk factors: as per the WHO guidelines subjects with a blood pressure of > 140/90 mmHg or using antihypertensive treatment and subjects with blood sugar > 130 mg/dl or using any anti diabetic or hyperglycemia drugs were categorised as diabetic. Subjects with high levels of total cholesterol, high LDL and low HDL were categorised as dyslipidemic. A positive family history of CAD was considered, in case of presence of a first degree relative who suffered coronary artery disease at the age of < 55 years for men and < 60 years for women. The subjects on any lipid-lowering drugs were excluded for the study. The subjects with triglyceride (TG) levels ˃ 400 mg/dl were also not recruited in the study.

Sample collection and variant detection

After informed consent was signed by all the subjects, venous blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes from 120 CAD patients. 100 blood samples were collected from healthy Saudi Arabians who were selected as controls.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated using Genomic DNA extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and samples were stored at − 20 °C for PCR amplification. The software Primer Premier 5.0 was used to design the Primers to amplify the whole exons and the exon–intron boundaries of the MEF2A gene. PCR products were purified with PCR purification kit (Invitrogen).

Direct sequencing

PCR products after purification were directly sequenced using an ABI Prism Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit by the dideoxy chain-termination method. Samples were processed using an ABI3730XL capillary sequencer from Applied Biosystems, CA, USA. SeqMan 6.1 module of the Lasergene (DNA Star Inc. WI, USA) software package was used for Sequence analysis and compared with reference Gene Bank Sequence.

Lipid measurements

Total cholesterol and HDL-C were measured in plasma using BM/Hitachi 717 by an enzymatic method (Sera-Pak Bayer). TG levels were assayed by a Boehringer-Mannheim enzymatic method. LDL-cholesterol was calculated using Friedewald formula (Guella et al. 2009).

Statistical analysis

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium calculations were performed. Deviation from HWE for genotype distribution was tested with significant relation to CAD to study the disturbing influences of genotype frequency. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. The gene-counting method was used for calculating allelic frequencies. The association between occurrence of CAD, SNPs, allelic frequencies and variants detected were assessed by the odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI). The significance was calculated by the Chi-square method. A p values ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The characteristics of the subjects are summarized in Table 1. The mean age of patients and normal controls was 39.8 ± 15.2 and 38.8 ± 16.2 years, respectively. To test genotype–phenotype associations, plasma lipid profile determinations were also carried out in the control (n = 100) and patient groups (n = 120). The plasma lipid parameters and genotypic data when compared revealed significant difference in the control and patient group showing significant differences. The lipid pattern of healthy controls and patients are shown in Table 1. All the patients showed significantly higher triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) levels and lower high density lipoprotein (HDL-C) levels than controls (p < 0.01). Three variations observed by direct complete sequencing of exon 11 in 120 ethnically unrelated Saudis free from any fat lowering diet and smoking are presented in Table 2. There was no deviation detected from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for these polymorphisms in all subjects. Interestingly, no differences in Chi-square values between observed and expected genotypes were seen. Among all genotypes, the variants detected were ≥ 3.84, suggesting that they are all in HWE. The rs325400 variants resulted in silent mutation at the 1323 codon (G1323T) and formed p.G443G of MEF2A gene. The allelic distributions and genotypes assessed for polymorphisms in the rs325400 are reported in Table 3. The observed genotypes include homozygous wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous variants. The heterozygous (GT) and homozygous (TT) variants of rs325400 were in more frequency in the CAD patients than controls, indicating that these variants are at higher risk to develop the disease. The genotype analysis comparing heterozygous to wild-type homozygous showed significant association of rs325400 (p = 0.00048) with CAD. Furthermore, we did not find the 21-bp deletion in any Saudi CAD patient and the control samples. This suggests that Saudi population is entirely different from other populations and 21 bp deletion has no association with CAD in Saudis. The lipid pattern of CAD patients, as illustrated in Table 1, was used to investigate the effect of rs325400 polymorphism on plasma lipid levels (Table 4). ANOVA analysis showed the significant effect of this polymorphism on HDL-C levels in patients varying in three genotypes with TT genotype showing the highest frequency when the GT and TT genotypes were grouped together (p = 0.03) (Table 5). Sequencing analysis showed Short Tandem Repeats (STR) (CAG)n variants at position 1235–1249 (Fig. 1a) leading to change of amino acid glutamine [(Q)n]. Most of the subjects had 2–5 repeats. Statistical significance was not observed (p = 0.0648) for association of this polymorphism in spite of this no such variant was detected in control samples. Deletion variants at 1244–1249 with Q deletion were also found in 6 patients, while no such variant was found in control healthy subjects (Fig. 1b). Other sequence changes analyzed included synonymous SNP: rs325400 at position 1323 with G to T transition (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, no other sequence changes were observed in exon 11 of Saudi population.

Table 1.

Clinical and biochemical characteristics of CAD patients and control subjects

Parameter Characteristics Controls (n = 100) CAD group (n = 120) p value
Age Years 39.8 ± 15.2 38.8 ± 16.2 < 0.001*
Gender Male, % 60 (60%) 68 (56.66) < 0.001*
Female, % 40 (40%) 52 (43.33)
TG (mmol L−1) Mean ± SD 1.06 ± 0.28 1.56 ± 0.7 < 0.0001*
Range (0.53–1.72) (0.57–3.77)
TC (mmol L−1) Mean ± SD 3.8 ± 0.48 4.24 ± 1.09 0.0002*
Range (3.01–5.11) (0.77–7.5)
HDL-C (mmol L−1) Mean ± SD 1.70 ± 0.39 1.11 ± 0.88 < 0.0001*
Range (0.76–2.11) (0.53–5.1)
LDL-C (mmol L−1) Mean ± SD 1.65 ± 0.33 2.53 ± 0.91 < 0.0001*
Range (1.0–2.5) (1.01–4.89)

Mean ± SD for all traits are presented. Student’s t test was used to compare the values of each group. Lipid levels are expressed as mmol L−1

*p value significant

Table 2.

Nature of genetic variations in MEF2A exon 11 by sequencing in Saudi population

Categories Variant AA code Minor allele frequency (%) p value or (95% CI)
CAD (n = 120) Control (n = 100)
STR (CAG)n (1235–1249) (Q)n (n = 2–5) 5 (4.1) 0 (0) 0.0648
0.1045
Deletion AGC (1244–1249) Q deletion 6 (5.3) 0 (0) < 0.0001*
0.03151
rs: 325400 G1323T G443G 68 (56) 31 (31) < 0.0001*
2.0102

Q glutamine, STR Short Tandem repeat polymorphism, AA amino acid, OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval

*p value significant

Table 3.

Correlation of rs325400 T > G MEF2 gene polymorphism among cases and controls

N TT GG GT χ 2 df p value (χ2 > 20.978) OR (95% CI) RR (95% CI)
Cases 120 68 6 46 20.978 2 0.00001 2.0102 1.4171
51.27 7.64 61.09 (1.3405–3.0146) (1.1396–1.7623)
− 5.46 − 0.35 − 3.73
Controls 100 26 8 66
42.73 6.36 50.91
− 6.55 − 0.42 − 4.47

OR odds ratio, (95% CI) 95% confidence interval, RR risk ratio

*p value significant

Table 4.

Allele frequencies of rs325400 T > G MEF2 gene in CAD

Group affected Common Hz (TT) Heterozygotes (GT) Rare Hz (GG) p allele freq q allele freq
Common Hz 88.17 46 6 0.79 0.21
Heterozygotes 68 40.4 6 0.77 0.23
Rare Hz 68 46 7.78 0.75 0.25

p allele freq = 0.76; q allele freq = 0.24

Table 5.

Significance of association of rs: 325400 polymorphism with lipoprotein levels

rs: 325400 CAD cases Healthy controls
TT (n = 68) GG (n = 6) GT (n = 46) p value TT (n = 31) GG (n = 8) GT (n = 66) p value
TC 2.38 ± 0.18 1.82 ± 0.21 2.13 ± 0.13 0.001 1.81 ± 0.22 1.62 ± 0.40 1.79 ± 0.42 0.48
HDL-C 0.36 ± 0.14 0.48 ± 0.16 0.42 ± 0.16 0.03 0.48 ± 0.14 0.41 ± 0.13 0.45 ± 0.12 0.32
LDL-C 1.18 ± 0.33 1.14 ± 0.16 1.20 ± 0.11 0.08 1.05 ± 0.18 1.19 ± 0.48 1.09 ± 0.31 0.44
TG 1.38 ± 0.64 1.20 ± 0.71 1.11 ± 0.55 0.069 1.38 ± 0.44 1.35 ± 0.62 1.25 ± 0.46 0.39

All data are represented as mean ± SD

TC total cholesterol, HDL-C high density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG triglyceride

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Type of variants detected from exon 11 of MEF2A gene by direct sequencing

Discussion

Familial CAD/MI, is genetically heterogeneous disease. Myocyte enhancer factor 2A gene (MEF2A) has always been attraction with respect to CAD but the results are controversial. In this study, three variants in exon 11 of MEF2A in Saudi population were verified. The most remarkable variant in this population was the heterogeneous (CAG)n polymorphism, the other two polymorphisms being within 100 bp downstream. This hypervariability in exon 11 of MEF2A gene made us to explore the association of exon11 MEF2A polymorphisms with CAD in Saudi population. Previous studies on this exon in Chinese population reported a positive association of an allele (CAG)9 with maximum severity and risk to CAD (Scacchi et al. 2011; Yuan et al. 2006). Another study in Chinese cohort from north (n = 1139) showed a borderline significance of p = 0.052 (Dai et al. 2010). However, in this study, we could not find any association of CAG repeats with CAD due to wide divergence in the number of these repeats in Saudi population carrying this disease.

We did not identify the 21-bp deletion in any of the affected individuals and controls. In 2003, a deletion in 21-bp (bp) coding sequence in exon 11 of gene MEF2A was indicated as an associated mutation in a large single Scandinavian CAD/MI family (Guella et al. 2009). Since then, MEF2A gene has been associated as a candidate gene in causing CAD/MI and hence has been studied in different populations. Recently 6-bp deletion (CAGCCG) in exon 11 of MEF2A gene was reported in Chinese population (Xu et al. 2016). The incidence of the 21-bp deletion varied considerably (0.09–1.92%) in sporadic patients (0.16% in Whites and 0.65% in Asian) (Yan et al. 2012). Two other studies, that included Whites and Japanese confirmed the 21-bp deletion in controls (0.12 and 0.51%, respectively) with the drawback that the subjects did not underwent angiography (Guella et al. 2009; Scacchi et al. 2011; Kajimoto et al. 2005; Gulec et al. 2008). The overall frequency of the 21-bp deletion was approximately 0.2% in the combined populations published to date. Our data indicate that the common (CAG)n variant might have a more compelling effect on CAD than rare 21-bp deletion, and MEF2A gene variants may, therefore, be a specific but rare causative agent of CAD/MI. In addition, we report that the mutation in rs: 325400 of exon 11 is strongly associated with the development of CAD in Saudi population. Our results have been consistent with the results from previous studies (Guella et al. 2009; Scacchi et al. 2011; Kajimoto et al. 2005; Gulec et al. 2008) but contradicted by observations in few others (Liebet al. 2008; Horan et al. 2006; Maiolino et al. 2011; Li et al. 2005). The present data provides evidence of an association between rs: 325400 polymorphisms in exon 11 of MEF2A gene with lipid levels of Saudis. Though this polymorphism is synonymous and is not involved directly in the altered production of mature protein, but may be in linkage disequilibrium with many other polymorphisms of MEF2A gene or many other nearby genes that may play an important role in onset of this disease. In addition, there can be differential activity of this gene with difference in SNP which could associate the allele of this SNP to CAD.

Among the quantitative parameters, only HDL-C was associated with genetic variations in CAD patients. In the MEF2A genotypes having T allele, the mean of HDL-C levels was found significantly higher than the genotypes not carrying it. A population which is at high risk (TT) was having low HDL cholesterol levels and high prevalence of CAD. The results are in the ranges of statistical significance (p = 0.03). However, the true association of MEF2A variants with the CAD/MI in particular population may be confirmed by future studies with large number of samples and expression studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we found rs325400 polymorphism in MEF2A gene is significantly associated to CAD risk in Saudi population, but other variants did not show any association. In addition, it was found that this polymorphism was significantly associated with lipid levels. Further studies with larger sample size are required to confirm this association. We did not find 21 or 6-bp deletion in any of our subjects also we found lot of heterogeneity in CAG repeats in Saudi population. SNP rs325400 is synonymous and does not appear to be directly implicated in the CAD, it is although possible that SNP rs325400 may be in linkage disequilibrium with other polymorphisms in MEF2A gene or in other nearby genes that could play an effective role in disease onset in Saudi population.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University, for funding this work through research group no.: RG-1435-073.

Author contributions

SZ proposed the theoretical frame and designed the experiments, AAJ contributed reagents, patient samples and ethical approval, TAW wrote manuscript and analyzed statistics.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bhagavatula MK, Fan C, Shen G-Q, Cassano J, Plow EF, Topol EJ, Wang Q. Transcription factor MEF2A mutations in patients with coronary artery disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:3181–3188. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen X, Gao B, Ponnusamy M, Lin Z, Liu J. MEF2 signaling and human diseases. Oncotarget. 2017;8(67):112152–112165. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dai DP, Zhou XY, Xiao Y, Xu F, Sun FC, Ji FS, Zhang ZX, Hu JH, Guo J, Zheng JD. Structural changes in exon 11 of MEF2A are not related to sporadic coronary artery disease in Han Chinese population. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40:669–677. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2010.02307.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elhawari S, Al-Boudari O, Muiya P, Khalak H, Andres E, Al-Shahid M, Al-Dosari M, Meyer BF, Al-Mohanna F, Dzimiri N. A study of the role of the myocyte-specific enhancer factor-2A gene in coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010;209:152–154. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. González P, García-Castro M, Reguero JR, Batalla A, Ordoñez AG, Palop RL, Lozano I, Montes M, Alvarez V, Coto E. The Pro279Leu variant in the transcription factor MEF2A is associated with myocardial infarction. J Med Genet. 2006;43:167–169. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2005.035071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guella I, Rimoldi V, Asselta R, Ardissino D, Francolini M, Martinelli N, Girelli D, Peyvandi F, Tubaro M, Merlini PA. Association and functional analyses of MEF2A as a susceptibility gene for premature myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2009;2:165–172. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.819326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gulec S, Ruchan Akar A, Akar N. MEF2A sequence variants in Turkish population. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2008;14:465–467. doi: 10.1177/1076029607306403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Han Y, Yang Y, Zhang X, Yan C, Xi S, Kang J. Relationship of the CAG repeat polymorphism of the MEF2A gene and coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:987–992. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Horan PG, Allen AR, Hughes AE, Patterson CC, Spence M, McGlinchey PG, Belton C, Jardine TC, McKeown PP. Lack of MEF2A ∆7aa mutation in Irish families with early onset ischaemic heart disease, a family based study. BMC Med Genet. 2006;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-7-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hsu L-A, Chang C-J, Teng M-S, Wu S, Hu C-F, Chang W-Y, Ko Y-L. CAG repeat polymorphism of the MEF2A gene is not associated with the risk of coronary artery disease among Taiwanese. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2010;16:301–305. doi: 10.1177/1076029608330476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kajimoto K, Shioji K, Tago N, Tomoike H, Nonogi H, Goto Y, Iwai N. Assessment of MEF2A mutations in myocardial infarction in Japanese patients. Circ J. 2005;69:1192–1195. doi: 10.1253/circj.69.1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Li W, Kavaslar N, Ustaszewska A, Doelle H. Lack of MEF2A mutations in coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1016. doi: 10.1172/JCI24186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lieb W, Mayer B, König IR, Borwitzky I, Götz A, Kain S, Hengstenberg C, Linsel-Nitschke P, Fischer M, Döring A, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Kreutz R, Ziegler A, Schunkert H, Erdmann J. Lack of association between the MEF2A gene and myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117:185–191. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu Y, Niu W, Wu Z, Su X, Chen Q, Lu L, Jin W. Variants in exon 11 of MEF2A gene and coronary artery disease: evidence from a case–control study, systematic review, and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maiolino G, Colonna S, Zanchetta M, Pedon L, Seccia TM, Cesari M, de Kreutzenberg SV, Avogaro A, Rossi GP. Exon 11 deletion in the myocyte enhancer factor (MEF) 2A and early onset coronary artery disease gene in a Sicilian family. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18:557–560. doi: 10.1177/1741826710397112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Scacchi R, Ruggeri M, Corbo RM. Variation of the butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) genes in coronary artery disease. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:1341–1344. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.03.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scheuner MT. Genetic evaluation for coronary artery disease. Genet Med. 2003;5:269–285. doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000079364.98247.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang S, Anderson C. Micromanaging atherogenesis. In: Wang h, Patterson c., editors. Atherosclerosis: risks, mechanisms, and therapies. New York City: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015. pp. 423–435. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang Q, Rao S, Topol EJ. Miscues on the “lack of MEF2A mutations” in coronary artery disease. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1399–1400. doi: 10.1172/JCI25475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang YN, Yang WC, Li PW, Wang HB, Zhang YY, Zan LS. Myocyte enhancer factor 2A promotes proliferation and its inhibition attenuates myogenic differentiation via myozenin 2 in bovine skeletal muscle myoblast. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0196255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Xu DL, Tian HL, Cai WL, Zheng J, Gao M, Zhang MX, Zheng Z-T, Lu QH. Novel 6-bp deletion in MEF2A linked to premature coronary artery disease in a large Chinese family. Mol Med Rep. 2016;14:649–654. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.5297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yamada Y, Ichihara S, Nishida T. Molecular genetics of myocardial infarction. Genom Med. 2008;2:7–22. doi: 10.1007/s11568-008-9025-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yuan H, Lü HW, Hu J, Chen SH, Yang GP, Huang ZJ. MEF2A gene and susceptibility to coronary artery disease in the Chinese people. Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = J Cent South Univ (Med Sci) 2006;31:453–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from 3 Biotech are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES