Abstract
Lung cancer has high morbidity and mortality rates. Smoking is involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer, and tobacco smoke may increase tumor cell invasion and metastasis. The effects of cigarette smoke extract (CSE) on the carcinoma human alveolar basal epithelial A549 cell line were investigated. A549 cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of CSE for 12, 24 and 48 h, and the transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) signal pathway was inhibited by addition of SB431542, a TGF-β1 receptor antagonist. The proliferation of A549 cells was assayed by a Cell Counting kit-8, invasiveness was assayed using Transwell chambers, and TGF-β1, phosphorylated mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 (p-Smad2), and matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) levels was assessed by western blot analysis. The invasiveness of A549 cells and the expression of TGF-β1, pSmad2, and MMP-3 were significantly increased by CSE (P<0.05). The effects of CSE were abrogated by SB431542 (P<0.05). In conclusion, CSE increased the invasiveness of A549 cells and its effects were abrogated by SB431542 and the TGF-β1/Smad2/MMP-3 pathway may have been involved.
Keywords: cigarette smoke extract, A549 cells, SB431542, transforming growth factor-β1, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2, matrix metalloproteinase 3
Introduction
Smoking is the primary cause of lung cancer. The proportion of cases attributable to smoking has reached 90% in countries with ongoing high tobacco consumption (1). Cigarette smoke contains at least 69 carcinogens, including ammonia, cadmium, nickel, nicotine (2), and nitrosamines such as 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (3). Tobacco smoke components not only cause cancer, but may also be involved in tumor invasiveness and metastasis. Cigarette smoking is known to increase the risk of prostate cancer metastasis (4), the metastatic ability of breast cancer cells (5), and the risk of pulmonary metastasis of breast cancer (6). Tobacco smoke may also increase the spread of lung carcinoma cells (7); however, the mechanism by which this happens is, to the best of our knowledge, unclear.
Metastasis is a well-regulated process (8) that depends on the invasion of cancer cells into surrounding tissues; it is a leading cause of cancer mortality (9), and is characteristic of lung cancer. Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) may be a key regulator of tumor cell invasion and metastasis. TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 are members of a superfamily of secreted cytokines that regulate cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, survival, and immunity, by ligand-receptor binding (10–12). TGF-β family members are ubiquitously expressed. The TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in lung cancer is a key first step in metastasis (13), and exposure of A549 cells to cigarette smoke extract (CSE) induces the expression, release and activation of TGF-β1 (14).
Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity in tumor cell metastasis includes degrading of basement membranes and the extracellular matrix, which facilitates tumor invasion and metastasis (15,16). TGF-β1 has been reported to stimulate the expression of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) in human corneal epithelial cells (17), but it is not known whether it has similar activity in lung cancer cells. The present study investigated the effect of CSE on the invasiveness of A549 cells and the possible involvement of TGF-β. The proliferation and invasiveness of A549 cells increased following CSE exposure. Expression of TGF-β1, mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2 (Smad2), and MMP3 was significantly increased by CSE and partly abrogated by SB431542, a TGF-β1 receptor inhibitor. SB431542 inhibited the CSE-induced invasiveness of A549 cells via the TGF-β1/MMP3 pathway.
Materials and methods
Cell culture and reagents
The A549 cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) kit was obtained from Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc. (Kumamoto, Japan). GAPDH, TGF-β1, phosphorylated (p)-Smad2, and MMP3 primary antibodies (dilution 1:1,000) were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Solid SB431542 (cat. no. HY-10431) was obtained from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA). The SB431542 was dissolved in 1 ml DMEM and the concentration was adjusted to of 10 mmol/l, which was verified to have no effect on the cell proliferation in preliminary experiments.
CSE preparation
Research cigarettes were purchased from Chengdu Tobacco Industry Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China); when burned, each cigarette contained 11 mg tar, 17 mg carbon monoxide, and 1.1 mg nicotine. CSE was prepared as described by Wirtz and Schmidt (18). Briefly, the filters were removed, cigarettes were installed on a pumping apparatus, and completely combusted in 2 min. The smoke from ten cigarettes was bubbled through a glass vessel containing 10 ml of serum-free DMEM, which was then adjusted to pH 7.4 and filtered through a 0.22-µm filter (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) to remove particles and bacteria. The CSE was standardized by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 320 nm with a DU 640 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA). DMEM was used as the blank control. The CSE spectrogram exhibited little variance (1.36±0.12 mmol/l) across preparations. The concentration of the resulting solution was designated as 100% and was diluted as required (0.1, 1.0 and 10.0%) for use in the experimental procedures. The CSE solutions were freshly prepared, and used within 30 min of preparation.
Cell Counting kit-8 (CCK-8) proliferation assay
In brief, A549 cells were treated with CSE, then seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5×104 cells/well in 100 µl DMEM and incubated at 37°C. When the cells reached 70% confluence, the medium was replaced with an equal volume containing CSE at concentrations of 0.1, 1.0 and 10.0% and cultured for 12, 24, or 48 h before addition of 10 µl CCK-8 solution. After 1–2 h, absorbance was read at 490 nM using a microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA).
Cell motility assay
The invasiveness of A549 cells was assayed in BioCoat Matrigel-coated invasion chambers (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) with 8-µm-pore size polycarbonate membranes. Cells were grown in serum-free DMEM at 37°C for 2 h, the medium was removed and 750 µl DMEM with 10% FBS was added into the lower chamber as a chemoattractant. A549 cells were treated with CSE or SB431542, then added to each upper chamber at a density of 5×104 cells/well in 2 ml DMEM with 1% FBS. After 2 h, 1.0% CSE and 100 nmol/l SB431542 were added to the upper chambers. The inserts and non-invasive cells were removed after 12 h. The invasive cells on the lower surface of the membrane were then fixed in 100% methanol for 15 min at room temperature, air dried, and stained with crystal violet for 30 min at room temperature. The numbers of cell in five random visual fields with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at a magnification of ×200 were recorded.
Western blot assays
Cells were treated with CSE or SB431542, then separated by 1 ml 0.25% trypsin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), then disrupted in ice-cold lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors (cat. no. FNN0011; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) for 30 min, and then clarified by centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Total protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay, and the sample was boiled for 5 min before loading. The cell lysate was resuspended in SDS buffer (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China), and 40 µg samples of protein were separated by 8% SDS-PAGE (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology). The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (EMD Millipore), blocked for 2 h with 5% bovine serum albumin (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) incubated with primary antibodies: Antibodies of GAPDH (cat. no. ab8245; dilution 1:1,000); TGF-β1 (cat. no. ab92486; dilution 1:1,000); phosphorylated (p)-Smad2 (cat. no. ab40855; dilution 1:1,000); and MMP3 (cat. no. ab53015; dilution 1:1,000) were obtained from Abcam. The incubation was overnight at 4°C, and then incubated with the corresponding horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (cat. no. HP6023; dilution 1:1,000; Abcam) for 2 h at 20°C. Immunoreactivity was visualized by SuperEnhanced chemiluminescence kit (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and the results were analyzed by Quantity One software v4.4.02 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA).
Statistical analysis
Experimental procedures were performed in triplicate, and the results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The significance of differences between the CSE groups was assessed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test. Student's t-test was used to compare the differences in different treatment groups. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicated statistically significant difference.
Results
CSE treatment increases the invasiveness of A549 cells
The proliferation and invasiveness of A549 cells were assayed following CSE treatment at concentrations of 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0% for 12, 24, and 48 h (Fig. 1A). At a concentration of 10.0%, CSE significantly decreased the proliferation of A549 cell; however, proliferation was not significantly affected by 1.0% CSE. Therefore, the effect of CSE on invasiveness was evaluated at a concentration of 1.0%. The results of the Transwell invasion assay (Fig. 1B) revealed that there were significantly more invasive cells on the lower membrane surface following CSE treatment compared with control cultures (P<0.05).
Figure 1.
CSE increases the invasiveness of A549 cells. (A) Cells were exposed to CSE at concentrations of 0.1–10.0% for 12, 24, or 48 h and the effect on cell viability was determined by Cell Counting kit-8 assay. (B) A549 cells were treated with 1.0% CSE for 12 h, and the effect on invasiveness was determined by Transwell assay and (C) quantified. **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 vs. controls. CSE, cigarette smoke extract.
CSE exposure significantly increases TGF-β1, Smad2, and MMP3 expression in A549 cells
To determine whether CSE promoted the activation of the TGF-β1 pathway, A549 cells were treated with 1.0% CSE for 48 h, and the expression of TGF-β1 and Smad2, which mediates TGF-β1 signaling, was assessed. The expression levels of TGF-β1 and Smad2 were significantly increased following CSE exposure (Fig. 2A and B). The expression of MMP3, an indicator of metastasis, was also significantly increased in A549 cells following exposure to CSE (Fig. 2C and D).
Figure 2.
Levels of TGF-β1, p-Smad2, and MMP3 in A549 cells was assayed by western blotting following CSE exposure for 48 h. (A) Western blot analysis reveals that levels of TGF-β1 and p-Smad2 were increased following exposure to 1.0% CSE exposure, with (B) densitometry analysis confirming this. (C) MMP3 expression in in 549 cells was significantly increased following exposure to 1.0% CSE, with (D) densitometry analysis confirming this. *P<0.05 vs. controls. CSE, cigarette smoke extract; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; p-Smad2, phosphorylated mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase 3.
Increased TGF-β1, Smad2, MMP3 expression and cell invasiveness in response to CSE is partly inhibited by SB431542
A549 cells were exposed to SB431542, a TGF-β1 receptor antagonist, to assess the involvement of TGF-β1/Smad2, and MMP3 following CSE treatment. At a density of 10 mmol/l, which was verified to have no effect on the cell proliferation in preliminary experiments (data not shown), to block the TGF-β1 receptor, SB431542 significantly decreased TGF-β1, Smad2 and MMP3 expression (Fig. 3A and B). In the Transwell invasion assay, SB431542 inhibited the effect of CSE on the invasiveness of A549 cells. The number of invasive CSE-exposed A549 cells was significantly decreased by treatment with SB431542 (Fig. 3C and D).
Figure 3.
Levels of TGF-β1, p-Smad2, and MMP3 increased by CSE treatment in A549 cells was significantly inhibited by SB431542. (A) A549 cells were treated with 1.0% CSE with or without 10.0 mmol/l SB431542 for 48 h, the levels of TGF-β1, p-Smad2, and MMP3 was assayed by western blot analysis, with (B) densitometry analysis confirming this. (C) The invasiveness of A549 cells was determined by Transwell assays and (D) quantified. ***P<0.001 vs. control; #P<0.05, CSE+SB431542 vs. CSE only. CSE, cigarette smoke extract; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor-β1; p-Smad2, phosphorylated mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 2; MMP3, matrix metalloproteinase 3.
Discussion
CSE exposure increased the proliferation and invasiveness of A549 cells; it also increased MMP3 production and TGF-β1/Smad2 pathway activity, which were inhibited by SB431542, a known TGF-β1 receptor antagonist.
The smoke generated from the tobacco in cigarettes exposes the smoker to upwards of 4,000 different xenobiotic chemicals (19,20), and exposure to cigarette smoke increases the risk of lung cancer (21). Cigarette smoke has also been associated with pancreatic cancer metastasis (22) and with the increased metastatic ability of breast cancer cells via promotion of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (5). CSE has also been reported to enhance the metastatic ability and invasiveness of lung cancer cells (7). In the present study CSE increased the invasiveness of A549 cells (Fig. 1B and C).
Metastasis is a complex multistep process and a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality (9). MMP3 is a proteolytic enzyme that is active in metastasis, capable of degrading structural components of the extracellular matrix (23) and disrupting intercellular and cell-extracellular matrix adhesions (24). MMP3 activity contributes to tumor invasion and metastasis, and is indicative of a poor survival prognosis (25). CSE exposure increased the expression of MMP3 in A549 cells (Fig. 2C and D) and may have increased the invasiveness of lung cancer cells by upregulating the MMP3 expression, which is in line with previous reports of MMP3 activity in lung cancer metastasis (26). As there are several other MMPs involved in the cancer metastasis, their roles should be studied in future experiments.
TGF-β is a mediator of cancer invasion and metastasis (27). TGF-β signals are transferred to the nucleus via TGF-β type I or type II receptors that phosphorylate canonical Smad2/3 downstream effectors (28). In the present study, CSE increased TGF-β1 and Smad2 activity (Fig. 2A and B). In vitro, treatment with an anti-MMP3 antibody was found to result in a dose-dependent decrease in active TGF-β1 (27). Activated TGF-β can regulate the secretion, expression, and activation of MMP3, resulting in a bidirectional regulatory loop (29).
SB431542 is a TGF-β1 receptor kinase inhibitor that interrupts the activation of downstream signaling pathways (30). SB431542 has previously been reported by Tanaka et al (31) to induce an in vivo antitumor immune response associated with TGF-β activity. Matsuyama et al (32) reported that SB431542 exerted antitumor activity by inhibiting the proliferation of osteosarcoma cells. Xi et al (33) revealed that SB431542 inhibited the invasiveness of RPMI 8226 cells by decreasing the expression of MMP3. In the present study, SB431542 significantly inhibited the activity of the TGFβ1/Smad2 pathway and decreased MMP3 expression in A549 cells exposed to CSE (Fig. 3A and B), and reduced the invasiveness of CSE-treated A549 cells (Fig. 3C and D).
In the current study, the promotion of the invasiveness of lung cancer cells by CSE was associated with the activation of the TGFβ1/Smad2 pathway and regulation of MMP3 expression. The effects of CSE were partially reversed by SB431542, a TGFβ1 receptor antagonist that may have therapeutic potential in cancer, which could be proven in other in vitro models, such as HAC-84 and GLC-15 cells, or in vivo experiments in the future.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding was received.
Availability of data and materials
All the data and materials are available upon reasonable request.
Authors' contributions
KL contributed to the study design and contributed to data analysis, CY contributed to performing experiments and KH contributed to data analysis.
Ethics approval and consent to publish
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.Pesch B, Kendzia B, Gustavsson P, Jöckel KH, Johnen G, Pohlabeln H, Olsson A, Ahrens W, Gross IM, Brüske I, et al. Cigarette smoking and lung cancer-relative risk estimates for the major histological types from a pooled analysis of case-control studies. Int J Cancer. 1012;131:1210–1219. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Song MA, Marian C, Brasky TM, Reisinger S, Djordjevic M, Shields PG. Chemical and toxicological characteristics of conventional and low-TSNA moist snuff tobacco products. Toxicol Lett. 2016;245:68–77. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hecht SS. It is time to regulate carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamines in cigarette tobacco. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2014;7:639–647. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-14-0095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moreira DM, Aronson WJ, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Boffetta P, Freedland SJ. Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of biochemical disease recurrence, metastasis, castration-resistant prostate cancer, and mortality after radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH database. Cancer. 2014;120:197–204. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Di Cello F, Flowers VL, Li H, Vecchio-Pagán B, Gordon B, Harbom K, Shin J, Beaty R, Wang W, Brayton C, et al. Cigarette smoke induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition and increases the metastatic ability of breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:90. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Murin S, Inciardi J. Cigarette smoking and the risk of pulmonary metastasis from breast cancer. Chest. 2001;119:1635–1640. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.6.1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gopalakrishna R, Chen ZH, Gundimeda U. Tobacco smoke tumor promoters, catechol and hydroquinone, induce oxidative regulation of protein kinase C and influence invasion and metastasis of lung carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12233–12237. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li Y, Li Y, Liu J, Fan Y, Li X, Dong M, Liu H, Chen J. Expression levels of microRNA-145 and microRNA-10b are associated with metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biol The. 2016;17:272–279. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2016.1139242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gupta GP, Massagué J. Cancer metastasis: Building a framework. Cell. 2006;127:679–695. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Imamura T, Hikita A, Inoue Y. The roles of TGF-β signaling in carcinogenesis and breast cancer metastasis. Breast cancer. 2012;19:118–124. doi: 10.1007/s12282-011-0321-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bierie B, Moses HL. Tumour microenvironment: TGFbeta: The molecular Jekyll and Hyde of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:506–620. doi: 10.1038/nrc1926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akhurst RJ, Derynck R. TGF-beta signaling in cancer-a double-edged sword. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11:S44–S51. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(01)82259-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu RY, Zeng Y, Lei Z, Wang L, Yang H, Liu Z, Zhao J, Zhang HT. JAK/STAT3 signaling is required for TGF-β-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in lung cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2014;44:1643–1651. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Checa M, Hagood JS, Velazquez-Cruz R, Ruiz V, Garcia-De-Alba C, Rangel-Escareño C, Urrea F, Becerril C, Montaño M, García-Trejo S, et al. Cigarette smoke enhances the expression of profibrotic molecules in alveolar epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: Regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2010;141:52–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deryugina EI, Quigley JP. Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006;25:9–34. doi: 10.1007/s10555-006-7886-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim HS, Shang T, Chen Z, Pflugfelder SC, Li DQ. TGF-beta1 stimulates production of gelatinase (MMP-9), collagenases (MMP-1, −13) and stromelysins (MMP-3, −10, −11) by human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res. 2004;79:263–274. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2004.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wirtz HR, Schmidt M. Acute influence of cigarette smoke on secretion of pulmonary surfactant in rat alveolar type II cells in culture. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:24–32. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09010024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fowles J, Dybing E. Application of toxicological risk assessment principles to the chemical constituents of cigarette smoke. Tob Control. 12:424–430. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.424. 203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Johnson MD, Schilz J, Djordjevic MV, Rice JR, Shields PG. Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:3263–3304. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sundar IK, Nevid MZ, Friedman AE, Rahman I. Cigarette smoke induces distinct histone modifications in lung cells: Implications for the pathogenesis of COPD and lung cancer. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:982–996. doi: 10.1021/pr400998n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Momi N, Ponnusamy MP, Kaur S, Rachagani S, Kunigal SS, Chellappan S, Ouellette MM, Batra SK. Nicotine/cigarette smoke promotes metastasis of pancreatic cancer through α7nAChR-mediated MUC4 upregulation. Oncogene. 2013;32:1384–1395. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Radisky DC, Levy DD, Littlepage LE, Liu H, Nelson CM, Fata JE, Leake D, Godden EL, Albertson DG, Nieto MA, et al. Rac1b and reactive oxygen species mediate MMP-3-induced EMT and genomic instability. Nature. 2005;436:123–127. doi: 10.1038/nature03688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Egeblad M, Werb Z. New functions for the matrix metalloproteinases in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:161–174. doi: 10.1038/nrc745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mehner C, Miller E, Nassar A, Bamlet WR, Radisky ES, Radisky DC. Tumor cell expression of MMP3 as a prognostic factor for poor survival in pancreatic, pulmonary, and mammary carcinoma. Genes Cancer. 2015;6:480–489. doi: 10.18632/genesandcancer.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jiang YN, Yan HQ, Huang XB, Wang YN, Li Q, Gao FG. Interleukin 6 trigged ataxia-telangiectasia mutated activation facilitates lung cancer metastasis via MMP-3/MMP-13 up-regulation. Oncotarget. 2015;6:40719–40733. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Costanza B, Umelo IA, Bellier J, Castronovo V, Turtoi A. Stromal modulators of TGF-β in cancer. J Clin Med. 2017;6:pii: E7. doi: 10.3390/jcm6010007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Derynck R, Zhang YE. Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature. 2003;425:577–584. doi: 10.1038/nature02006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Krstic J, Santibanez JF. Transforming growth factor-beta and matrix metalloproteinases: Functional interactions in tumor stroma-infiltrating myeloid cells. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:521754. doi: 10.1155/2014/521754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Badalucco S, Di Buduo CA, Campanelli R, Pallotta I, Catarsi P, Rosti V, Kaplan DL, Barosi G, Massa M, Balduini A. Involvement of TGFβ1 in autocrine regulation of proplatelet formation in healthy subjects and patients with primary myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2013;98:514–517. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2012.076752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tanaka H, Shinto O, Yashiro M, Yamazoe S, Iwauchi T, Muguruma K, Kubo N, Ohira M, Hirakawa K. Transforming growth factor β signaling inhibitor, SB-431542, induces maturation of dendritic cells and enhances anti-tumor activity. Oncol Rep. 2010;24:1637–1643. doi: 10.3892/or_00001028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Matsuyama S, Iwadate M, Kondo M, Saitoh M, Hanyu A, Shimizu K, Aburatani H, Mishima HK, Imamura T, Miyazono K, Miyazawa K. SB-431542 and Gleevec inhibit transforming growth factor-beta-induced proliferation of human osteosarcoma cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7791–7798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xi H, Shuai QG, Shao LL. Involvement of the TGFβ1/Smad2/MMP3 signaling pathway in SB431542-induced inhibition of cell invasion in multiple myeloma RPMI 8226 cells. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:541–546. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All the data and materials are available upon reasonable request.



