Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cell Res. 2018 Apr 27;29:215–219. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2018.04.013

Establishment of a human embryonic stem cell line with homozygous TP53 R248W mutant by TALEN mediated gene editing

An Xu a,1, Ruoji Zhou a,b,1, Jian Tu a,c, Zijun Huo a,d, Dandan Zhu a, Donghui Wang a,e, Julian A Gingold f, Helen Mata g, Pulivarthi H Rao g, Mo Liu a, Alaa MT Mohamed a, Celine Shuet Lin Kong a, Brittany E Jewell a,b, Weiya Xia h, Ruiying Zhao a, Mien-Chie Hung h,i, Dung-Fang Lee a,b,j,k,*
PMCID: PMC6021017  NIHMSID: NIHMS974267  PMID: 29730572

Abstract

Genetic mutations in TP53 contribute to multiple human cancers. Here we report the generation of a H1-p53(R248W/R248W) human embryonic stem cell line harboring a homozygous TP53 R248W mutation created by TALEN-mediated precise gene editing. The H1-p53(R248W/R248W) cell line maintains a normal karyotype, robust pluripotency gene expression, and the potential to differentiate to the three germ layers.


Resource table.

Unique stem cell line identifier WAe001-A-17
Alternative name(s) of stem cell line H1-p53(R248W/R248W) and 1P6
Institution The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Contact information of distributor Dung-Fang Lee dung-fang.lee@uth.tmc.edu
Type of cell line Human embryonic stem cell line
Origin Human
Additional origin info Sex: Male
Cell Source H1 hESCs
Clonality Clonal
Method of reprogramming N/A
Genetic Modification Yes
Type of Modification Homozygous R248W mutation of TP53 on exon 7
Associated disease Li-Fraumeni syndrome; cancers
Gene/locus 17p13.1; TP53 exon 7
Method of modification Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN)
Name of transgene or resistance N/A
Inducible/constitutive system N/A
Date archived/stock date 2017/12
Cell line repository/bank Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry (https://hpscreg.eu/user/cellline/edit/WAe001-A-17)
Ethical approval Cell lines were used according to institutional guidelines. UTHealth approval number: SCRO-16-01

Resource utility

Growing evidence underscores the important contributions of p53 mutations in driving tumor progression. The H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line provides an ideal model for studying the functions of the p53(R248W) mutation in tumor initiation and progression in a human cell model, which opens up opportunities for development of new cancer therapeutic strategies.

Resource detail

TP53 is the most mutated gene in human cancers and leads to tumor initiation and progression in multiple cell types (Zhou et al., 2017). Previously, we established a Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) iPSC disease model to investigate LFS-associated osteosarcoma (Lee et al., 2015), demonstrating the potential of a pluripotent stem cell (PSC) disease model to study mutant p53 (mutp53)-associated malignancies. Generation of disease-related genetic traits in PSCs provides an attractive approach to elucidate gene function in disease development (Gingold et al., 2016). We recently generated a H1-p53(R282W/R282W) line as a laboratory resource to facilitate use of the PSC disease model in studying p53(R282W)-associated malignancies (Zhou et al., 2018).

To enhance our understanding of the landscape of mutp53-associated malignancies, we generated a H1 hESC line harboring a homozygous TP53 R248W mutation. The strategy of TALEN-mediated precise gene editing is illustrated in Fig. 1A. The targeting plasmids contain (1) a pair of TALEN plasmids targeting exon7 and intron 7 of TP53, respectively; and (2) a pFNF donor vector carrying a Frt-EM7-NeoR-Frt (FNF) selection cassette flanked by 1 kb left and right homologous arms of the TP53 genomic region. H1 hESCs were transduced with these plasmids and selected by G418. G418-resistant clones were confirmed by genomic PCR using two pairs of primers (p53_5FM13 and 3FNF-N1 for left arm, 5FNF-C1 and 3p53_16821 for right arm, Table 2) (Fig. 1B). Clone P1–36 demonstrated accurate insertion of the FNF cassette with a TP53 R248W mutation into the TP53 genome targeting site. Unexpectedly, Sanger sequencing of endogenous TP53 exon 7 (using the pair of primers p53_7FM13 and p53_7RM13) in the P1–36 line revealed the presence of a homozygous TP53 R248W mutation in which the mutation was also detected in the un-inserted allele (Fig. 1C, upper panel). The unique DNA sequence chromatogram of TGG in P1–36 ruled out the possibility of a mixed population in P1–36 (Fig. 1C, upper panel). This additional TP53 R248W mutation was probably created spontaneously during mutant donor vector-mediated homologous recombination.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Generation and characterization of the homozygous p53 R248W mutant human embryonic stem cell line H1–p53(R248W/R248W).

(A) Schematic overview of the strategy for TP53 R248W mutation generation in the TP53 genomic locus. TALEN target sites sequences are shown in blue. Exon sequences are in upper case, while intron sequences are in lower case. A Frt-EM7-NeoR-Frt (FNF) cassette is introduced between the left homologous arm (containing the R248W mutation) and the right homologous arm, as indicated by rods. PCR primers used for validation and sequencing are indicated with arrows.

(B) Precise homologous recombination in the TP53 genomic locus. P1–36 and 1P6 clones were confirmed by genomic PCR. Arrow indicates the footprint of Frt.

(C) Sanger sequencing indicates the presence of the R248W mutation in both alleles of H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line.

(D) Western blotting reveals increased protein stability of p53(R248W) in the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line (upper panel). qRT-PCR assay indicates increased p53 mRNA expression in the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line (lower panel).

(E) Cell morphology (upper panel) and AP staining (lower panel) of the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line. Scale bar, 50 μm.

(F) Immunofluorescence staining of pluripotency factors (NANOG and OCT4) and hESC surface markers (SSEA4 and TRA-1-81) in the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line. Scale bar, 50 μm.

(G) qRT-PCR assay for the expression of endogenous pluripotency genes (NANOG, SOX2, OCT4, DPPA4, REX1, and TERT) in the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line.

(H) In vitro teratoma assay of the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line. Scale bar, 50 μm.

(I) Karyotype analysis of the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line.

(J) Mycoplasma PCR detection of the H1–p53(R248W/R248W) line.

Table 2.

Reagents details.

Antibodies used for immunocytochemistry
Antibody Dilution Company Cat # and RRID
Pluripotency Markers Goat anti-NANOG 1:500 R and D Systems Cat# AF1997 RRID:AB_355097
Pluripotency Markers Rabbit anti-OCT4 1:300 Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-9081 RRID:AB_2167703
Pluripotency Markers Mouse anti-SSEA4 PE-conjugated 1:600 R and D Systems FA1435P-025
Pluripotency Markers Mouse anti-TRA-1-85 Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated 1:600 R and D Systems Cat# FAB3195A RRID:AB_663789
p53(Western Blotting) Mouse anti-p53 (DO-1) 1:1000 Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-126
B-ACTIN (Western Blotting) Mouse anti-β-ACTIN 1:10000 Proteintech Cat#66009–1-Ig
Secondary antibodies Goat anti-rabbit IgG (Alexa Fluor 488 conjugate) 1:500 Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 111–545-144 RRID:AB_2338052
Secondary antibodies Donkey Anti-Goat IgG (Alexa Fluor488 conjugate) 1:500 Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 705–545-003 RRID:AB_2340428

Primers
Target Forward/Reverse primer (5′–3′)

Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) OCT4 AACCTGGAGTTTGTGCCAGGGTTT/TGAACTTCACCTTCCCTCCAACCA
Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) SOX2 AGAAGAGGAGAGAGAAAGAAAGGGAGAGA/GAGAGAGGCAAACTGGAATCAGGATCAAA
Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) NANOG TTTGTGGGCCTGAAGAAAACT/AGGGCTGTCCTGAATAAGCAG
Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) DPPA4 GACCTCCACAGAGAAGTCGAG/TGCCTTTTTCTTAGGGCAGAG
Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) REX1 GCCTTATGTGATGGCTATGTGT/ACCCCTTATGACGCATTCTATGT
Pluripotency Markers (qPCR) TERT TGAAAGCCAAGAACGCAGGGATG/TGTCGAGTCAGCTTGAGCAGGAATG
p53 (qPCR) TP53 CAGCACATGACGGAGGTTGT/CCAGACCATCGCTATCTGAGC
Housekeeping Genes (qPCR) GAPDH CCACTCCTCCACCTTTGAC/ACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCA
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing p53_5FM13 TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTCTAGCTCGCTAGTGGGTTGC
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 3FNF-N1 TCCAGACTGCCTTGGGAAA
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 5FNF-C1 GGGGAGGATTGGGAAGACAA
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 3p53_16821 CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCGCCCAGGAGGGTATAATGAGCTA
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing p53_7FM13 TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGCCTCCCCTGCTTGCCACAG
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing p53_7RM13 CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCGGGAGCAGTAAGGAGATTCC
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 5p53-L001-1 kb/EcoRI for left homologous arm GAATTCCGCGTCCGCGCCATGGCCATCTACAAGCAGTCACAG
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 3p53-L001-1 kb/EcoRI for left homologous arm GAATTCAGGCCAGTGTGCAGGGTGGCAAGTGGCTCCTGACCT
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 5p53-R001-1 kb/BamHI for right homologous arm GGATCCGCTGTGCCCCAGCCTCTGCTTGCCTCTGACCCCTGG
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 3p53-R001-1 kb/NotI for right homologous arm GCGGCCGCCAGGCTAGGCTAAGCTATGATGTTCCTTAGATTAGG
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 5p53-R248W for R248W mutagenesis TGCATGGGCGGCATGAACTGGAGGCCCATCCTCACCATC
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing 3p53-R248W for R248W mutagenesis GATGGTGAGGATGGGCCTCCAGTTCATGCCGCCCATGCA

The FNF cassette in the P1–36 clone was subsequently removed by transfecting the line with Flp recombinase plasmid. The FNF removal clone 1P6 was identified by loss of genomic PCR products (Fig. 1B, upper and middle panels). The larger PCR band of the TP53 exon 7 region of the FNF-removed clone 1P6 demonstrated the footprint of Frt, which was all that remained after excision from the FNF cassette-inserted allele (Fig. 1B, arrow in lower panel). Sanger sequencing of endogenous TP53 exon 7 of the 1P6 clone further confirmed the presence of the TP53 R248W mutation in both alleles (Fig. 1C, lower panel), consistent with the findings from the parental P1–36 clone. Im-munoblotting revealed higher p53 protein levels in both P1–36 and 1P6 clones than those in parental H1 line (Fig. 1D, higher panel), supporting the increased protein stability of mutp53. Although both P1–36 and 1P6 clones demonstrated homozygous TP53 R248W mutation, higher p53 mRNA levels were measured in the 1P6 clone, explaining the higher p53 protein levels in the 1P6 clone compared to the P1–36 clone (Fig. 1D, lower panel). We rename the 1P6 line to H1-p53(R248W/R248W).

The H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line maintained a classical dome-shaped hESC morphology and exhibited positive alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity (Fig. 1E, scale bar 50 μm). Immunofluorescent staining of the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line demonstrated high expression of hESC pluripotency factors and hESC surface markers (Fig. 1F, scale bar 50 μm). Although quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) showed lower mRNA levels of pluripotency genes in the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line compared with the parental H1 line (Fig. 1G), these cells functionally perform as PSCs, as demonstrated by their proliferation in hESC medium as well as in vivo three germ-line differentiation capacity (Fig. 1H, scale bar 50 μm). Karyotype analysis confirmed the normal karyotype of the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line (Fig. 1I). Furthermore, PCR-based mycoplasma detection assay demonstrated that the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line is mycoplasma-free (Fig. 1 J). The short tandem repeat (STR) profile of H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line was identical to that of its parental H1 line (data available with authors). The characterization of the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line was summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characterization and validation.

Classification Test Result Data
Morphology Photography hESC morphology Fig. 1 panel E
Phenotype Immunocytochemistry NANOG, OCT4, SSEA4, TRA-1-81 and AP-positive Fig. 1 panel E, F
RT-qPCR Lower levels of expression of NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, DPPA4 and REX1 compared with H1 Fig. 1 panel G
Genotype Karyotype (G-banding) and resolution 46 XY Resolution: 400 Fig. 1 panel I
Identity Microsatellite PCR (mPCR) OR N/A N/A
STR analysis 14 sites tested, STR profile matches human embryonic cell line H1 Data available with authors
Mutation analysis (IF APPLICABLE) Sequencing Homozygous R248W mutation of TP53. Fig. 1 panel C
Southern Blot OR WGS N/A N/A
Microbiology and virology Mycoplasma Mycoplasma test shows negative. Fig. 1 panel J
Differentiation potential In vivo teratoma Teratoma comprises tissues of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Fig. 1 panel H
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) HIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C N/A N/A
Genotype additional info (OPTIONAL) Blood group genotyping N/A N/A
HLA tissue typing N/A N/A

In summary, the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line is karyotypically normal and retains pluripotency. This line has great potential to offer insight into the role of p53(R248W) in embryogenesis and tumorigenesis.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

Cell culture of hESC H1 and H1-derived clones were performed as described (Zhou et al., 2018).

Construct of TALEN plasmids and TP53(R248W) donor vector

The TALEN guides targeting intron 7 of TP53 were designed by ZiFiT Targeter Version 4.2 (http://zifit.partners.org/). Each TAL effector binding domain targeting upstream (5′-TCCAGGTCAGGAGCC ACT-3′) and downstream (5′-TGGGGCACAGCAGGCC-3′) were assembled into JDS vectors according to the protocol developed by the Joung Lab (Sander et al., 2011).

The left and right homologous arms were amplified from hESC H1 gDNA isolated using PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher) (Table 2). PCR products of both arms were separated on 0.8% agarose gel, extracted by QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), ligated into pGEM-Teasy vector (Promega), and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed to generate the R248W mutation on the left homologous arm. Both homologous arms were digested by designed restriction enzymes (EcoRI used for the right homologous arm and BamHI and NotI used for the left homologous arm) and ligated into the pFNF (Frt-EM7-NeoR-Frt) vector (Addgene plasmid #22687) to generate the TP53 R248W donor vector.

Generation of H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line by TALEN-mediated genome editing

One day before electroporation, irradiated CF1 MEFs (Thermo Fisher) were seeded on 0.1% gelatin pre-coated dishes using MEF culture medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% of FBS (GenDEPOT) and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin) at a density of 6.7 × 105 cells per 100 mm dish.

To generate the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) cell line, 1 × 107 H1 hESCs were re-suspended in 0.6 ml Embryo Max Electroporation Buffer (Millipore) mixed with 50 μg of TP53 R248W donor vector and 5 μg of each TALEN plasmids, and electroporated at 300 V/500 uF in the Bio-Rad Gene Pulser Xcell System. After electroporation, cells were immediately seeded on 100 mm MEF plates in hESC medium (DMEM/F12 (Corning) supplemented with 20% KnockOut Serum replacement (Life Technologies), 1% Gibco GlutaMax (Life Technologies), 1% NEAA (Corning), 0.0007% β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma) and 10 ng/ml FGF2 (EMD Millipore)) supplemented with 2 μM ROCK inhibitor Thiazovivin. After 2 days, cells were selected with 50 μg/ml G418 for 2–3 weeks and medium was changed every 2 to 3 days until colonies were big enough for picking. Individual clones were picked and expanded for further confirmation by genomic PCR as described above.

Standard PCR

Genomic DNA was isolated by Easy-DNA gDNA purification kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. OneTaq Quick-Load 2× Master Mix (New England Biolabs) was used for standard PCR according to manufacturer’s instructions. Reaction was performed as following protocol: 94 °C for 1 min; 35 cycles of reaction: 94 °C for 30 s, 56 °C for 45 s and 68 °C for 1 min; and 68 °C for 5 min on a Biometra TRIO Thermal Cyclers (Analytik Jena). The product sizes of PCR are 1370 bp using p53_5FM13 and 3FNF-N1 primers, 368 bp and 432 bp (with Frt footprint) using p53_7FM13 and p53_7RM13 primers, and 1606 bp using 3p53_16821 and 5FNF-C1 primers.

Western blotting analysis and immunofluorescent staining

Immunoblotting and immunofluorescent staining were performed as described (Zhou et al., 2018).

qRT-PCR

Total mRNA from the H1-p53(R248W/R248W) cells was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen). Reverse Transcription cDNA synthesis reactions were performed by iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Quantitative PCR reactions were performed using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX96 machine (Bio-Rad). The reaction was performed as following parameters: 50 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycle of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 30 s, and 95 °C for 10 min. Samples were analyzed in triplicate and normalized to GAPDH expression.

Karyotype analysis

The G-banding karyotype was carried out in the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Cancer and Hematology Centers. Twenty metaphase chromosome spreads were counted and G band resolution was 400. The H1-p53(R248W/R248W) line were karyotyped at passage 5 after the line was generated.

In vivo teratoma formation assay

Teratoma formation assay was performed as described (Zhou et al., 2018).

Mycoplasma detection

Mycoplasma detection was performed using PCR Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Applied Biological Materials Inc).

STR analysis

STR analysis was performed by the Characterized Cell Line Core Facility at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. The number of STRs at 14 loci (AMEL, CSF1PO, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D21S11, D3S1358, D5S818, D7S820, D8S1179, FGA, TH01, TPOX and vWA) was assessed for H1-p53(R248W/R248W) cells. This STR profile was compared with the STR profile of parental H1 cells.

Acknowledgments

R.Z. is supported by UTHealth Innovation for Cancer Prevention Research Training Program Pre-doctoral Fellowship (Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas grant RP160015) and Wei Yu Family Endowed Scholarship (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences). J.T. and Z.H. are supported by the Ke Lin Program of the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. D.W. is supported by State-sponsored Joint Ph.D. Program from China Scholarship Council (201606380093). M.-C.H. is supported by NIHR01 CA211615. D.-F.L. is the CPRIT scholar in Cancer Research and supported by NIH Pathway to Independence AwardR00 CA181496 and CPRIT AwardRR160019.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gingold J, Zhou R, Lemischka IR, Lee DF. Modeling cancer with pluripotent stem cells. Trends cancer. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Lee DF, Su J, Kim HS, Chang B, Papatsenko D, Zhao R, Yuan Y, Gingold J, Xia W, Darr H, Mirzayans R, Hung MC, Schaniel C, Lemischka IR. Modeling familial cancer with induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell. 2015 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Sander JD, Cade L, Khayter C, Reyon D, Peterson RT, Joung JK, Yeh JRJ. Targeted gene disruption in somatic zebrafish cells using engineered TALENs. Nat Biotechnol. 2011 doi: 10.1038/nbt.1934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Zhou R, Xu A, Gingold J, Strong LC, Zhao R, Lee DF. Li–Fraumeni syndrome disease model: a platform to develop precision cancer therapy targeting oncogenic p53. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2017.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  5. Zhou R, Xu A, Wang D, Zhu D, Mata H, Huo Z, Tu J, Liu M, Mohamed AM, Jewell BE, Gingold J. A homozygous p53 R282W mutant human embryonic stem cell line generated using TALEN-mediated precise gene editing. Stem Cell Res. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2018.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES