Abstract
Background:
Decompressive craniotomy (DC) is a known risk factor for the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) in the patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Herein, the present study reported the development of PTH requiring ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt after DC for TBI.
Methods:
Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from 1983 to April 2018. The studies evaluating the prevalence of PTH requiring VP shunt after DC in the patients with TBIwere selected without language restriction. A random-effects meta-analysis using event rate (ER) and 95% confidence intervals(CIs), was runby RevMan5.3 software.
Results:
Out of 355 studies obtained from the databases, 25 studies were included and analyzed in the meta-analysis. The studies included 2402 patients undergoing DC for TBI, 354 of whohad PTH. The pooled ER of hydrocephalus in the patients undergoing DC for TBI was 17.7% [95%CI: 13.2 to 23.4%; P<0.001]. In addition, the pooled analysis showed that ER of hydrocephalus was 13% in adults [95%CI: 9 to 18.5%; P<0.001] and 37.6% in children [95%CI: 27.79 to 48.7%; P=0.029; I2=0%].
Conclusion:
The present study demonstrated that DC after TBI was associated with the development of PTH, especially in children compared to adults.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, decompressive craniotomy, hydrocephalus, ventriculoperitoneal shunt
1. INTRODUCTION
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. More than 90% of the burden is shared bylow - and middle-income countries (1). Decompressive craniotomy (DC) is a surgical method performed to immediately reduce intracranial pressure (ICP) (2). DC is a known risk factor for the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus(PTH) in the patients with TBI (3).PTH affects 11.9% - 36% of patients undergoing DC (4), is an important cause of morbidity after TBIand affects the patients’ long-term outcomes (5). PTH has been recognized since Dandy’s report in 1914 (6). The cause of hydrocephalus development after DC is considered to be multi-factorial, and risk factors associated with PTH still remain unclear (7). The treatment of PTH in patients who undergo DC is a difficult problem to solve. Shunt operation with or without cranioplasty may be done simultaneously aiming to correct the underlying problems. Therefore, it is important to prevent the PTH for the good outcomes of the patients with DC (8). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the development of PTH requiring ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt after DC for TBI.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Search strategies
Four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched using key terms “hydrocephalus” and “decompressive craniectomy”and (“head trauma”or“traumatic head”or“head injury”or“brain injury”or“brain trauma”or“traumatic brain”). The databases were searched from 1983 to April 2018.
Study selection and selection criteria
The studies on the prevalence of PTH requiring VP shunt after DC in patients with TBI were selected without language restriction. The studies were selected for analysis if they a) were retrospective studies; b) included patients with TBI for any reason; c) showed the prevalence of PTH after DC alone; d) included patients with any age; e) diagnosed hydrocephalus by computed tomography scan, and f) included patients with any Glasgow Coma Score (GCS).
Data extraction
One author (M.S) checked all studies and selected the eligible ones. Then, the author extracted the relevant data, including the first author, publication year, country, number of patients undergoing DC, number of patients with hydrocephalus, GCS of patients, age/range of patients, and percentage of males in patients undergoing DC. Another author (R.F) re-checked the data and disagreements were resolved via conversation by both. The definition of hydrocephalus was based on the study of Honeybul and Ho (9).
Statistical analyses
A random-effects meta-analysis using event rate (ER) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was done by Review Manager 5.3 (RevMan 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom).I2 statistic was used to determine heterogeneity between the studies, and it was considered heterogeneous if P<0.1, and P-value (2-sided) less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant in other analyses. The publication bias was assessed through funnel plot analysis using Begg’s and Egger’s tests.
3. RESULTS
Out of 355 studies retrieved from the databases, after removing the duplicate studies and excluding the irrelevant ones, the full-texts of 44 studies were assessed for eligibility. Nineteen studies were excluded with reasons (Figure 1). At last, 25 studies were included and analyzed in the meta-analysis.
Figure 1. The flowchart of the study.
The characteristics of 25 studies included in meta-analysis are shown in Table 1. Six studies (10-15)were reported from the USA, four studies (5,8,16,17) from Korea, three studies (18-20) from China, two studies (21, 22) from Germany, two studies (23, 24) from Australia, and one study from Italy (3), Finland (25), Taiwan (26), Brazil (27), Canada (28), Uruguay (29), India (30), and Japan (31). The studies included 2402 patients undergoing DC for TBI, 354 of who had PTH. Preoperative or admission GCS, mean age/range, and percentage of males in the patients undergoing DC are shown in Table 1. In all studies, the percentage of males was higher than females.
Table 1: The characteristics of studies included in meta-analysis (n=25). Abbreviation: DC; decompressive craniectomy.
| The first author, publication year | Country | Study Design | No. of patients undergoing DC | No. of patients with Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus | Mean initial (preoperative or admission) Glasgow Coma score | Mean age/range of patients undergoing DC, year | %male in patients undergoing DC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang, 2003 (18)] | China | Retrospective | 68 | 20 | - | - | - |
| Aarabi, 2006 (10) | USA | Retrospective cohort | 50 | 5 | 3-15 | 25.3/>18 | 66 |
| Kan, 2006 (11) | USA | Retrospective cohort | 51 | 20 | 4.6 | 6.6/<18 | 64.7 |
| Jagannathan, 2007 (12) | USA | Retrospective | 17 | 5 | 4.6 | 11.9/2-19 | 65 |
| Choi, 2008 (8) | Korea | Retrospective | 55 | 13 | 9.2 | 49/>30 | - |
| Morgalla, 2008 (21) | Germany | Retrospective | 33 | 4 | ≤8 | 36.3/13-60 | 60.6 |
| Yang, 2008 (19) | China | Retrospective | 108 | 10 | Range: 3 to >9 | 44.3/<18 to >60 | 68.5 |
| Aarabi, 2009 (13) | USA | Retrospective cohort | 54 | 7 | 6.6 | Median: 32 /16-68 | 83.3 |
| Ban, 2010 (16) | Korea | Retrospective | 89 | 10 | 7.2 | 51.4/4-82 | 88.8 |
| Honeybul, 2010 (23) | Australia | Retrospective cohort | 41 | 4 | ≤8 | 32.1/- | 83 |
| Honeybul, 2011 (24) | Australia | Retrospective | 164 | 23 | - | - | - |
| Malmivaara, 2011 (25) | Finland | Retrospective cohort | 54 | 6 | ≤8:83% > 8:17% | 37 years/13-65 | 81.5 |
| Su, 2011(26) | Taiwan | Retrospective | 149 | 35 | ≤8 | - | - |
| De Bonis, 2013 (3) | Italy | Retrospective cohort | 64 | 19 | 7.3 | 37.9/16-80 | 79.7 |
| Saade, 2014 (27) | Brazil | Retrospective | 56 | 6 | 4/5 critical:51.7%& >5: 27: 48.3% | -/18-65 | 83.9 |
| Sedney, 2014 (14) | USA | Retrospective | 20 | 2 | 3.8 | 37.8/≥ 18 | 90 |
| Zeiler, 2014 (28) | Canada | Retrospective | 20 | 4 | 6.5 | 44.1/19-72 | 75 |
| Grille, 2015 (29) | Uruguay | Retrospective | 64 | 4 | 7 | 31/- | 79 |
| Ki, 2015(17) | Korea | Retrospective | 92 | 24 | Range: 3 to >8 | 52.8/- | 74 |
| Pechmann, 2015 (20) | Germany | Retrospective cohort | 12 | 5 | 4.5 | 8.5/2-14 | 67 |
| Sinha, 2015 (30) | India | Retrospective cohort | 944 | 69 | ≤8 | Median:32/- | 82.7 |
| Yuan, 2015 (20) | China | Retrospective cohort | 62 | 16 | - | 50/>18 | - |
| Kinoshita, 2016 (31) | Japan | Retrospective cohort | 39 | 6 | 7 | -/≥60 | 71.8 |
| Jehan, 2017 (15) | USA | Retrospective cohort | 33 | 3 | Median: 9 | 48.8/>18 | 69.7 |
| Kim, 2017 (5) | Korea | Retrospective | 63 | 34 | - | 53.7/7-85 | 77.8 |
Event rate of hydrocephalus (without age restriction)
The pooled ER of PTH in the patients undergoing DC for TBI was 17.7% [95%CI: 13.2 to 23.4%; P<0.001] and I2=86.6% (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Forest plot of random-effects of event rate of posttraumatic hydrocephalus in all patients of each age undergoing decompressive craniectomy.
Event rate of hydrocephalus (adult vs. children)
The pooled analysis showed that ER of PTH was 13% in adults [95%CI: 9 to 18.5%; P<0.001; I2=74.7%] and 37.6% in children [95%CI: 27.79 to 48.7%; P=0.029; I2=0%] (Figure 3). Therefore, ER of PTH in children undergoing Dc for TB was around three times more than adults.
Figure 3. Forest plot of random-effects of event rate of posttraumatic hydrocephalus in adults and children undergoing decompressive craniectomy.
Publication bias
Egger’s and Begg’s tests did not show any publication bias in each analysis (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Funnel plot of event rate of posttraumatic hydrocephalus in (A) all studies, (B) adults, and (C) children undergoing decompressive craniectomy.

4. DISCUSSION
TBI is one of the most common causes of death among young people in the industrialized countries (32). This meta-analysis showed that the ER of PTH in patients with TBI and undergoing DC was significantly high (17.7%). In addition, the ER of PTH was higher in children than adults (37.6% vs. 13%).
Among the studies included in meta-analysis, Grille et al. (29) reported the lowest rate (6.3%) and Kim et al. (5) reported the highest rate (54%). The low rate of hydrocephalus in Grille’s study (29) was perhaps due to under diagnosis or utilization of different diagnostic criteria according to international references, confirmed by the study of Honeybul and Ho (24). But in the study of Kim et al.,(5) among the coexisting hemorrhages at the first admission, the maximal thickness of traumatic subdural hemorrhage and the extent of midline shift were significantly larger in the group with PTH compared to the group without PTH, and another study confirmed the extent of midline shift (3). The study of Honeybul and Ho (9) found that the development of hydrocephalus was associated with low admission GCS score and subdural hygroma rather than craniotomy close to the midline. Complications following DC for TBI were found to occur at specific times, and the poor GCSscore (≤ 8) or the severity of brain injury (11, 16, 23) and the older age (≥ 65) were found to show the high incidence of hydrocephalus (16). Also, extended craniectomy and repeated operation might play a role in the development of PTH in patients receiving DC (8). It was hypothesized that hydrocephalus might be dependent on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamic alterations (8, 33), especially in the venous reabsorption phase (33).
Therefore interhemispheric subdural hygroma may represent an epiphenomenon following DC close to the midline, and that subdural hygroma can be considered an expression of some alteration of CSF dynamics that may precede the appearance of hydrocephalus (3). One study showed that in patients with severe head trauma undergoing DC, hydrocephalus was associated with a large craniectomy area and contralateral subdural hygroma (17). Leaving the bone flap out at that time appeared to help controlI CP, but was associated with an increased incidence of PTH and wound complications (11). One study (9) reported that timing of cranioplasty was not significantly associated with hydrocephalus requiring a VP shunt, but maximum ICP prior to decompression had a significant correlation with hydrocephalus. Therefore, DC causes alterations of CSF and high ICP that these changes can increase the risk of postoperative hydrocephalus.
A randomized controlled trial showed that younger age was associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after DC in a recent study by Vedantam et al. (4) The presence of interhemispheric subdural hygroma and younger age were associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after DC in patients with severe TBI. Low et al. (34) found that younger age was associated with PTH, while others have shown a link between older age and PTH (35, 36). High-energy mechanisms of injury, higher compliance of brain tissue (37), and lack of cerebral atrophy could contribute to an increased risk of symptomatic hydrocephalus in younger patients after DC (4). A prospective cohort among the patients that survived long enough showed the higher incidence of hydrocephalus requiring VP shunt in patients who had bilateral DC compared to unilateral DC (21% vs. 9%; P>0.05) (38). Therefore, GCS score, alterations of CSF, ICP, and age may play significant roles in the development of PTH in patients receiving DC.
Limitations
The age range, GCS, and time of follow-up, DC procedure, and type of trauma were different between the studies.
5. CONCLUSIONS
The present study demonstrated that DC after TBI was associated with the development of PTH especially in children compared to adults that several factors can impact on the incidence of PTH. Therefore, randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to confirm these conclusions by controlling these factors affecting the development of PTH.
Authors Contributions:
Conception, design, acquisition of data, and analysis and interpretation of data: Reza Fattahian and Masoud Sadeghi; Drafting the article: Masoud Sadeghi; Critically revising the article: Seyed Reza Bagheri.
Conflict of interest:
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hofman K, Primack A, Keusch G, Hrynkow S. Addressing the growing burden of trauma and injury in low-and middle-income countries. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(1):13–17. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.039354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Faleiro RM, Faleiro LC, Caetano E, Gomide I, Pita C, Coelho G, et al. Decompressive craniotomy: prognostic factors and complications in 89 patients. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2008;66(2B):369–373. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2008000300017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.De Bonis P, Sturiale CL, Anile C, Gaudino S, Mangiola A, Martucci M, et al. Decompressive craniectomy, interhemispherichygroma and hydrocephalus: a timeline of events? ClinNeurolNeurosurg. 2013;115(8):1308–1312. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vedantam A, Yamal JM, Hwang H, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Factors associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(5):1547–1552. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.JNS162721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kim H, Lee HS, Ahn SY, Park SC, Huh W. Factors Associated Postoperative Hydrocephalus in Patients with Traumatic Acute Subdural Hemorrhage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(6):730–737. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dandy W, Blackfan KD. Internal hydrocephalus. An experimental,clinical and pathological study. Am J Dis Child. 1914;8(6):406–482. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wani AA, Ramzan AU, Tanki H, Malik NK, Dar BA. Hydrocephalus after decompressive craniotomy: a case series. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2013;49(5):287–291. doi: 10.1159/000363701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Choi I, Park HK, Chang JC, Cho SJ, Choi SK, Byun BJ. Clinicalfactors for the development of posttraumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;43(5):227–231. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2008.43.5.227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Honeybul S, Ho KM. Incidence and risk factors for post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for intractable intracranial hypertension and evacuation of mass lesions. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(10):1872–1878. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Scalea TM, Eisenberg HM. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(4):469–479. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.4.469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kan P, Amini A, Hansen K, White GL, Jr, Brockmeyer DL, Walker ML, et al. Outcomesafterdecompressive craniectomy for severe traumatic brain injury in children. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(5 Suppl):337–342. doi: 10.3171/ped.2006.105.5.337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jagannathan J, Okonkwo DO, Dumont AS, Ahmed H, Bahari A, Prevedello DM, et al. Outcome following decompressivecraniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term followup. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(4 Suppl):268–275. doi: 10.3171/ped.2007.106.4.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aarabi B, Hesdorffer DC, Simard JM, Ahn ES, Aresco C, Eisenberg HM. Comparative study of decompressive craniectomy after masslesion evacuation in severehead injury. Neurosurgery. 2009;64(5):927–939. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000341907.30831.D2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sedney CL, Julien T, Manon J, Wilson A. The effect of craniectomy size on mortality, outcome, and complications after decompressive craniectomy at a rural trauma center. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2014;5(3):212–217. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.133555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jehan F, Azim A, Rhee P, Khan M, Gries L, O’Keeffe T, et al. Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy only for intracranial hemorrhage evacuation: A propensity matched study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(6):1148–1153. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ban SP, Son YJ, Yang HJ, Chung YS, Lee SH, Han DH. Analysis of complications following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;48(3):244–250. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ki HJ, Lee HJ, Lee HJ, Yi JS, Yang JH, Lee IW. The RiskFactors for Hydrocephalus and Subdural Hygroma after Decompressive Craniectomy in Head Injured Patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2015;58(3):254–561. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2015.58.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yang XJ, Hong GL, Su SB, Yang SY. Complications induced by decompressive craniectomies after traumatic brain injury. Chin J Traumatol. 2003;6(2):99–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F, Li G, Lou R, Liu WG, et al. Surgicalcomplications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150(12):1241–1247. doi: 10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yuan Q, Wu X, Yu J, Sun Y, Li Z, Du Z, et al. Subdural hygroma following decompressive craniectomy or non-decompressive craniectomy in patients with traumatic brain injury: Clinicalfeatures and risk factors. Brain Inj. 2015;29(7-8):971–980. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1004760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Morgalla MH, Will BE, Roser F, Tatagiba M. Do long-term results justify decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg. 2008;109(4):685–690. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pechmann A, Anastasopoulos C, Korinthenberg R, van Velthoven-Wurster V, Kirschner J. Decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury in children: complications and outcome. Neuropediatrics. 2015;46(1):5–12. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Honeybul S. Complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J ClinNeurosci. 2010;17(4):430–435. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Honeybul S, Ho KM. Long-term complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(6):929–935. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Malmivaara K, Kivisaari R, Hernesniemi J, Siironen J. Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(4):656–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03294.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Su TM, Lee TH, Huang YH, Su FW, Chen WF. Contralateralsubdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: clinical features and outcome. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):833–837. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821b092a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saade N, Veiga JC, Cannoni LF, Haddad L, Araújo JL. Evaluation of prognostic factors of decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2014;41(4):256–262. doi: 10.1590/0100-69912014004006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zeiler FA, West M. Decompressive craniectomy: contralateral lesions and metabolic abnormalities. Can J Neurol Sci. 2014;41(3):350–356. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100017297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grille P, Tommasino N. Decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury: prognostic factors and complications. Rev Bras TerIntensiva. 2015;27(2):113–118. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20150021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sinha S, Raheja A, Garg M, Moorthy S, Agrawal D, Gupta DK, Satyarthee GD, Singh PK, Borkar SA, Gurjar H, Tandon V, Pandey RM, Sharma BS. Decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injury: A single-center, multivariate analysis of 1,236 patients at a tertiary care hospital in India. NeurolIndia. 2015;63(2):175–183. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.156277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kinoshita T, Yoshiya K, Fujimoto Y, Kajikawa R, Kiguchi T, Hara M, et al. Decompressive Craniectomy in Conjunction With Evacuation of Intracranial Hemorrhagic Lesions Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Martins ET, Linhares MN, Sousa DS, Schroeder HK, Meinerz J, RigoL A, et al. Mortality in severe traumatic brain injury : a multivariated analysis of 748 Brazilian patients from Florianópolis City. J Trauma. 2009;67(1):85–90. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318187acee. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.De Bonis P, Pompucci A, Mangiola A, Rigante L, Anile C. Post-traumatic hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy: an underestimated risk factor. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(11):1965–1970. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Low CY, Low YY, Lee KK, Chan SP, Ang BT. Post-traumatichydrocephalus after ventricular shunt placement in a Singaporeanneurosurgical unit. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(6):867–872. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jiao QF, Liu Z, Li S, Zhou LX, Li SZ, Tian W, et al. Influencingfactors for posttraumatic hydrocephalus in patients suffering from severe traumatic brain injuries. Chin J Traumatol. 2007;10:159–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kaen A, Jimenez-Roldan L, Alday R, Gomez PA, Lagares A, Alén JF, et al. Interhemispheric hygroma after decompressive craniectomy: does it predict posttraumatic hydrocephalus? J Neurosurg. 2010;113(6):1287–1293. doi: 10.3171/2010.4.JNS10132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kiening KL, Schoening W, Unterberg AW, Stover JF, Citerio G, Enblad P, et al. Assessment of the relationship betweenage and continuous intracranial compliance. Acta NeurochirSuppl. 2005;95:293–297. doi: 10.1007/3-211-32318-x_60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Honeybul S, Ho KM. Decompressive craniectomy for severetraumatic brain injury: the relationship between surgicalcomplications and the prediction of an unfavourable outcome. Injury. 2014;45(9):1332–1339. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



