Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 27;34(13):i237–i244. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty228

Table 3.

Performance on classification accuracy of one-dimensional CNNs

Method Accuracy F-value
CNN with DAFS (word2vec) 0.980 0.931
CNN with DAFS (one-hot coding) 0.971 0.901
CNN with DAFS (only secondary structure) 0.943 0.803
CNN with Clustal Omega (one-hot coding) 0.958 0.850

Note: ‘CNN with DAFS (word2vec)’ represents one-dimensional CNN with input of DAFS alignments and word2vec distributed representation, ‘CNN with DAFS (one-hot coding)’ denotes the one with input of DAFS alignments and one-hot coding distributed representation, ‘CNN with DAFS (only secondary structure)’ represents the one with input of only secondary structure information, and ‘CNN with Clustal Omega (one-hot coding)’ denotes the one with input of Clustal-Omega alignments and one-hot coding distributed representation.