Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2018 Jun 28;27(7):737–747. doi: 10.1111/exd.13676

Inhibition of interleukin‐12 and/or interleukin‐23 for the treatment of psoriasis: What is the evidence for an effect on malignancy?

Elizabeth N Ergen 1,✉, Nabiha Yusuf 1
PMCID: PMC6023723  NIHMSID: NIHMS963844  PMID: 29704872

Abstract

Immune cells and cytokines play an important role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Interleukin‐12 (IL‐12) and IL‐23 promote cellular responses mediated by T cells, which contribute to an inflammatory loop responsible for the induction and maintenance of psoriatic plaques. Antibodies that inhibit IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 are key treatment options for patients with psoriasis. IL‐12 and IL‐23 also play a key role in immune responses to infections and tumors. A growing body of information from clinical trials, cohort studies, postmarketing reports, genetic studies and animal models provides insights into the potential biological relationships between IL‐12/23 inhibition and malignancies. We summarize this information in tables and provide some context for the interpretation of these data with the goal of informing dermatologists who are using IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 inhibitors to treat patients with psoriasis.

Keywords: biological therapy, cancer, interleukin, psoriasis

1. INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic immune‐mediated disease that affects 3.2% of the adult US population1 and is characterized by scaly red plaques2 associated with a diminished quality of life.2, 3 Psoriasis is associated with multiple comorbidities, including arthritis, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and depression,4, 5 as well as decreased life expectancy in patients with severe disease.6 An increased risk of cancer has been observed among patients with psoriasis compared with the general population.7 Cohort studies have shown that patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of specific cancers regardless of their treatment, including non‐melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), lymphohematopoietic cancers and cancers of the respiratory and digestive tracts.7, 8, 9 The interleukin‐12 (IL‐12)/23 inhibitor ustekinumab is an established treatment for psoriasis, and IL‐23–specific inhibitors are among the newest therapies, with promising efficacy and safety profiles (Table 1; Figure 1).10, 11 IL‐12 and IL‐23 play a central role in T‐cell–mediated immunity and the proinflammatory responses associated with autoimmune conditions.12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 However, in vitro and animal studies have suggested that IL‐12 and IL‐23 may have distinct roles in contributing to protective immune responses to tumors19, 20, 21 and bacterial infections.12, 22 Thus, therapies targeted to IL‐12 and IL‐23 carry a theoretical risk of decreased defenses against pathogens and tumor surveillance. A concern for an increased risk of malignancy has been raised with other immunosuppressive therapies used for the treatment of psoriasis, such as anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, owing to the role of TNF in tumor growth inhibition.23 This is a review of the currently available information on the role of IL‐12 and IL‐23 in tumor growth and is written for clinicians who want to understand the potential risk of malignancy associated with blocking IL‐12 and/or IL‐23 in the treatment of psoriasis.

Table 1.

Inhibitors of IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 licensed or in clinical development for the treatment of psoriasis

Generic name [compound] (brand name) Antibody type Mechanism of action Manufacturer References
Ustekinumab
[CNTO‐1275]
(Stelara®) 		Fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody Binds with high affinity to IL‐12/23p40 subunit Janssen Biotech Inc. Kauffman et al85
Briakinumaba
[ABT‐874, J‐695]
(Ozespa) 		Fully human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody Binds to IL‐12/23p40 subunit Abbott Laboratories Ltd Fragoulis et al,86 Panaccione et al87
Guselkumab
[CNTO 1959]
(Tremfya™) 		Fully human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody Binds to IL‐23p19 subunit Janssen Biotech Inc. Reich et al,11 Gordon et al88
Tildrakizumab
[MK‐3222, SCH 900222]
(Ilumya™) 		Humanized mouse IgG1κ monoclonal antibody Binds with high affinity to IL‐23p19 subunit (297 pmol/L) Merck & Co, Inc., and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. Reich et al,11 Papp et al89
Risankizumab
[ABBV‐066, BI 655066] 		Humanized IgG1κ monoclonal antibody Binds with high affinity to IL‐23p19 subunit (dissociation constant <10 pmol/L) Boehringer Ingelheim and AbbVie Inc. Krueger et al,90 Papp et al,39 Singh et al91
Mirikizumab
[LY3074828] 		Humanized monoclonal antibody Blocks IL‐23 Eli Lilly and Company Eli Lilly and Company92
Open in a new tab

Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin.

a

US and European license applications withdrawn by manufacturer in 2011.37

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Structure of IL‐12 and IL‐23 cytokines and receptors. IL, interleukin; Jak, Janus kinase; R, receptor; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; Tyk, tyrosine kinase

2. STRUCTURE AND BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IL‐12 AND IL‐23 IN PSORIASIS

IL‐12 and IL‐23 are heterodimers, sharing a common p40 (beta chain) subunit that is combined with either a p35 alpha chain (IL‐12) or p19 alpha chain (IL‐23; Figure 1).13, 18 IL‐12 and IL‐23 signal through heterodimeric receptors, both of which contain IL‐12 receptor β1 (IL‐12Rβ1), which is coupled with IL‐12Rβ2 to form the IL‐12 receptor and with IL‐23R to form the IL‐23 receptor.17, 18 Signalling, mediated through the Janus kinase–signal transducers and activators of transcription (Jak‐STAT) pathway, ultimately results in IL‐12 and IL‐23 promoting the development of cell‐mediated responses driven by different subsets of T helper (TH) cells.17, 18

IL‐12 plays a key role in differentiation, maintenance and activity of immune cell subsets, including TH1 cells (which produce interferon‐γ) and natural killer cells (Figure 2).12, 16, 24 IL‐23 has a key role in maintenance and activity of IL‐17–producing TH17 cells and IL‐22–producing TH22 cells.25 In turn, IL‐17 induces activation and proliferation of keratinocytes, which produce inflammatory cytokines, including IL‐23, leading to a self‐amplificatory loop.26, 27 Consequently, antibodies targeted to IL‐12 and IL‐23 (p40 inhibitors) affect TH1, TH17 and TH22 responses, whereas those targeted to IL‐23 alone (p19 inhibitors) primarily affect TH17 and TH22 responses.26, 27

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Biological effects of IL‐12 and IL‐23 and their inhibitors in psoriasis. DC, dendritic cell; IFN, interferon; IL, interleukin; TH, T helper; TNF, tumor necrosis factor

3. INHIBITORS OF IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSORIASIS

The development of anti–IL‐12/23 antibodies was originally initiated based on the observation that mice deficient in the IL‐12p40 subunit (the subunit shared by IL‐12 and IL‐23) and those treated with neutralizing anti–IL‐12p40 antibodies showed resistance to autoimmunity.15 The discovery of IL‐2318 followed by the molecular characterization of IL‐2317 and other murine and genetic studies helped identify the key pathogenic role of IL‐23 in psoriasis, as summarized by Gaffen et al.25 It is now understood that IL‐12 and IL‐23 act on different components of the chronic inflammatory loop associated with the formation of psoriatic plaques.28 An association between IL‐12 and psoriasis is supported by the presence of TH1 cells and interferon‐γ in psoriatic lesions.29 However, recent data from a mouse model of psoriasis suggest that IL‐12 may dampen skin inflammation in psoriasis by modulating IL‐23–mediated inflammatory events, decreasing skin invasion by TH17 cells and promoting an anti‐inflammatory genetic programme in keratinocytes.30

Two antibodies targeting IL‐12/23p40—ustekinumab and briakinumab—have been evaluated as treatments for psoriasis and other immune‐mediated diseases.31, 32, 33, 34, 35 Ustekinumab is the only IL‐12/23p40 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).36 Clinical development of briakinumab was discontinued, thought to be because of safety concerns reported in the clinical trials, including cardiac events and malignancies.31, 37 Guselkumab was the first antibody specifically targeting IL‐23p19 to be approved for the treatment of moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis38, and 3 further IL‐23p19 inhibitors are currently in active development for the same indication. Efficacy and safety data have been published for tildrakizumab (phase 311) and risankizumab (phase 239); mirikizumab (LY3074828) is currently entering phase 2 development.40

4. MALIGNANCIES REPORTED IN CLINICAL TRIALS

A variety of cancer types have been reported in clinical trials of IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 inhibitors (Table 2). NMSCs were the most frequently reported malignancies. These are the most common malignancies in humans (albeit not routinely reported to cancer registries), with basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) more common than squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs).41 A meta‐analysis of observational studies found that the risk of SCCs was increased in patients with psoriasis compared with the general population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 5.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.63–10.71) and correlated with patient exposure to 8‐methoxypsoralen–ultraviolet (UV) A therapy for treatment of psoriasis.9 Risk of BCCs was also increased in patients with psoriasis, but to a lesser extent than SCCs (SIR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.83–2.20).9 In trials of ustekinumab for psoriasis, as in the general population,41 the proportion of BCCs was higher than that of SCCs.32, 42, 43, 44 However, a pooled analysis of safety data from all briakinumab phase 2 and phase 3 trials and interim data from an open‐label extension trial suggested that the risk of SCC was similar to the risk of BCC in patients treated with briakinumab, which may suggest a relative or absolute increase in the risk of SCC.45 Concern about the effect of briakinumab on NMSCs was thought to be one of the reasons for discontinuing its development.31, 37

Table 2.

Reported malignancies in clinical trials of IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 inhibitors in patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis receiving active treatment with an IL‐12/23 OR IL‐23 inhibitor

Inhibitor Phase Name NCT # Study length N Treatment arms Cases of reported malignancies Reference
BCC SCC Prostate Breast Others
Ustekinumab 1 Single dose – 16 wk 18 0.1–5 mg/kg None Kauffman et al85
2 – 00320216 36 wk 320 45 or 90 mga 2 1 1 None Krueger et al44
3 PHOENIX 1 00267969 76 wk 766 45 or 90 mga 4 1 1 4: thyroid cancer, lentigo maligna, colon cancer, transitional cell carcinoma Leonardi et al32
Ext PHOENIX 1 OLE – >5 y (264 wk) 753 45 or 90 mg 13 1 5 1 9: 3 melanomas (2 in situ, 1 invasive), and 1 each of colon cancer, lymphoma, metastatic pancreatic carcinoma, head/neck cancer, thyroid cancer, transitional cell carcinoma Kimball et al43
3 PHOENIX 2 00307437 52 wk 1230 45 or 90 mga 7b 2: hepatocellular carcinoma, SCC of the tongue Papp et al33
3 ACCEPT 00454584 64 wk 903 45 or 90 mgc 6 + 2d 1 + 2d 1 1 3: oral neoplasm, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, mycosis fungoides Griffiths et al42
2e Dose ranging 02054481 48 wk 166 45 or 90 mg None Papp et al39
3f NAVIGATE 02203032 60 wk 871 45 or 90 mg 3 1 2: bile duct cancer, pancreatic carcinoma Langley et al93
Briakinumab 2 M05‐736 00292396 12 wk 180 100 or 200 mga 1 None Kimball et al94
3 M10‐114 00691964 12 wk 347 200–100 mga , c 1 malignant melanoma in situ Gottlieb et al95
3 M10‐315 00710580 12 wk 350 200–100 mga , c 1 2: colon cancer, lip neoplasm Strober et al96
3 M10‐255 00679731 52 wk 317 200–100 mgg 1 1 1 2: transitional cell carcinoma, breast neoplasm‐intraductal carcinoma Reich et al97
3 M06‐890 00570986 52 wk 1465 200–100 mga 4 6 4: nasopharyngeal, tonsillar, lung, and colon cancers Gordon et al31
Guselkumab 1 Single, ascending dose 00925574 24 wk 24 10–300 mga None Sofen et al98
2 X‐PLORE 01483599 52 wk 293 5–200 mgh 1 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Gordon et al88
3 VOYAGE 1 02207231 48 wk 837 100 mgh 2 1 1 Blauvelt et al46
3 VOYAGE 2 02207244 72 wk 992 100 mgh 2 2 1 Reich et al10
3 NAVIGATE 02203032 60 wk 871 100 mgi 1 1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder Langley et al93
Tildrakizumab 1 Sequential, rising, multiple dose – 16 wk 77 0.05–10 mg/kga None Kopp et al99
2b Dose finding 01225731 52 wk 353 5–200 mga 1 malignant melanoma Papp et al89
3 reSURFACE 1 01722331 64 wki 772 100 mg, or 200 mga 3b 4: unspecified Reich et al11
3 reSURFACE 2 01729754 52 wki 1090 100 mg, or 200 mga , c 4b 4: unspecified Reich et al11
Risankizumab 1 Single, rising dose 01577550 24 wk 39 0.01–5 mga None reported Krueger et al90
2 Dose ranging 02054481 48 wk 166 18, 90, or 180 mgj 2 1 salivary gland neoplasm Papp et al39
Open in a new tab

BCC, basal cell carcinoma; IL, interleukin; NCT, national clinical trial; NMSC, non‐melanoma skin cancer; OLE, open‐label extension; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

Blank cells indicate no cases were reported in the publication.

a

vs placebo.

b

BCC + SCC combined.

c

vs etanercept.

d

2 cases had both BCC and SCC.

e

Active control vs risankizumab.

f

Active control vs guselkumab.

g

vs methotrexate.

h

vs placebo or adalimumab.

i

Data are reported up to week 28.

j

vs ustekinumab.

The clinical evaluation of IL‐23p19 inhibitors is ongoing, and data available thus far are limited. NMSCs have been reported in some clinical trials.10, 11, 39, 46 Publications about tildrakizumab reported low numbers (7 cases total) of NMSCs but did not differentiate BCCs and SCCs.11 Two cases of BCCs were reported in the phase 2 trial of risankizumab.39

Prostate and breast cancers are the most common internal malignancies in men and women, respectively.47 Patients with psoriasis have not been found to have a significantly increased risk of prostate cancer compared with the general population,7, 8 but the relative risk of breast cancer in patients with psoriasis is less clear. Two analyses showed no significant increased risk,7, 8 and one showed a slightly increased risk compared with the general population.9 Several cases of prostate and breast cancers occurred in trials of ustekinumab,32, 42, 43, 44 briakinumab34 and guselkumab.10, 46 These malignancy events reported in clinical trials do not prove causation but do suggest a possible biological relationship that may trigger further investigation.48

5. MALIGNANCIES REPORTED IN POSTMARKETING SAFETY DATA

Ustekinumab, which has been approved since 2009, is currently the only IL‐12/23 or IL‐12 inhibitor with postmarketing safety data. The prescribing information (PI) for ustekinumab contains a general warning that it “may increase risk of malignancy,” based on the observations that (i) NMSCs were reported in 1.5% of patients and malignancies excluding NMSCs (non‐NMSCs) were reported in 1.7% of patients among patients treated with ustekinumab (3.2 years’ median follow‐up); (ii) the most frequently observed non‐NMSCs were prostate, melanoma, colorectal and breast cancers, but they were similar in type and number to those expected in the general US population when adjusted for age, gender and race; and (iii) rapid appearance of multiple cutaneous SCCs was found in postmarketing reports among patients receiving ustekinumab who had pre‐existing risk factors for developing NMSC.36 The concerns raised in the ustekinumab PI are in line with an analysis of postmarketing safety data reported to the FDA, which found that patients treated with ustekinumab were 15 times more likely to report a case of cancer than were patients treated with apremilast, a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE‐4) inhibitor.49 Furthermore, a safety signal was detected in a study of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database, which indicated that ustekinumab may be associated with several malignancies, including B‐cell lymphoma; epithelioid sarcoma; and lung, oesophageal, ovarian, renal, testis and thyroid cancers.50

In contrast, an analysis of data from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) showed that patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab had numerically fewer non‐NMSCs (0.48/100 patient‐years [PYs]) than did patients treated with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody directed at TNF (0.79/100 PYs) or any other biologics (0.73/100 PYs) or non‐biologics (0.84/100 PYs).51 Results from an analysis of the German Psoriasis Registry (PsoBest) showed similar rates of malignancies excluding NMSCs in patients receiving systemic therapies (0.46/100 PYs) or biologics (0.49/100 PYs), with no relevant differences between therapies.52 Evidence from controlled clinical trials and registries indicates that ustekinumab is well tolerated, with rates of overall mortality and malignancy comparable with those expected in the general population.32, 33, 53, 54 Although the postmarketing pharmacovigilance studies mentioned previously were not designed to study causality or to quantify increased cancer risk associated with specific therapies,49, 50 they can be helpful to identify safety signals that may be relevant to the advancement of overall patient safety.55 Postmarketing safety data are not yet available for tildrakizumab, guselkumab or risankizumab. Long‐term data are needed to identify any potential associations between IL‐23 inhibitors and malignancies.

Clinical trials detect adverse events during trials of relatively short duration. For example, the trials of IL‐12/23 and IL–23 inhibitors summarized in Table 2 varied in duration from 12 to 76 weeks. Consequently, drugs are usually made available for public use before rare but potentially serious adverse reactions have been identified and their probabilities quantified.48 Although NMSCs may develop within weeks to months56 and are relatively easy to detect by visual inspection, other malignancies may take longer to be discovered. Thus, the incidence of internal malignancy, and even NMSCs, in a clinical trial may not be a good indicator of a drug's long‐term effect on malignancy. Malignancies that occur infrequently or develop slowly may only be detected in postmarketing evaluations, making them a critical element of drug safety monitoring efforts. An effect on pre‐existing malignancies is difficult to assess as most trials exclude these patients from receiving systemic immunosuppressive drugs. For example, trials for ustekinumab, briakinumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab and risankizumab all excluded patients with a pre‐existing malignancy in the preceding 5 years (except fully treated BCCs or SCCs of the skin and/or fully treated cervical carcinoma in situ).10, 11, 31, 32, 39, 46

6. RISK OF MALIGNANCY IN HUMANS WITH GENETIC TRAITS SIMULATING NEUTRALIZATION OF IL‐12 AND/OR IL‐23

In the first report of cancer in a patient with IL‐12Rβ1 deficiency (the receptor subunit required to bind the p40 subunit shared by IL‐12 and IL‐23), the patient developed oesophageal SCC at age 25 years and died at age 29 years, an age at which this cancer is exceedingly rare (Table 3).57 Additional studies of IL‐12 genetic deficiencies have investigated whether such deficiencies are associated with increased likelihood of infections and cancer.58, 59 Genomewide association studies have shown that polymorphisms in genes encoding the IL‐12p40 subunit or the IL‐12p35 subunit, which result in a decreased biological effect of IL‐12, are linked to increased susceptibility to oesophageal cancer,60 osteosarcoma,61 bladder cancer62 and prostate cancer,63 as well as susceptibility to and/or severity of cervical cancer.64 Reports of genetic deficiencies simulating a deficiency in the IL‐23–signalling pathway are limited. Several genomewide association studies have been conducted in Chinese populations; they show that variants of IL‐23R, the subunit specific for the IL‐23 receptor, are associated with a significantly reduced risk of gastric cancer,65 but with a significantly increased risk of oesophageal cancer,66 hepatocellular carcinoma67 and acute myeloid leukaemia.68 However, the effect of these IL‐23R variants on the function of IL‐23 (eg, gain, loss or no effect) was not specifically described in the studies. Taken together, these findings might lead to the hypothesis that IL‐12/23 inhibitors have the potential to increase the risk of these cancers. However, a limitation of genomewide association studies is that they are not designed to investigate the causal relationship between a specific polymorphism and an increased cancer risk. For example, although several studies had shown that the TNF‐238 polymorphism increased cancer risk, a meta‐analysis of 34 studies did not find a significant association between this polymorphism and increased cancer risk.69

Table 3.

IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 genetic deficiencies associated with increased risk of cancer

Gene mutation or polymorphism Effect on IL‐12 and/or IL‐23 Effect on malignancy Potential implications for therapy with IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 inhibitors
IL‐12Rβ1 homozygous deficiency case report Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 functions Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma at age 25 y, relapse and death at age 29 y57 IL‐12/23 inhibitors may increase risk of oesophageal cancer
IL‐12Rβ1 polymorphism: 378 GG/GC vs CC Decreased
IL‐12 levels 		Increased risk of oesophageal cancer60 IL‐12/23 inhibitors may increase risk of oesophageal cancer
IL‐12B (IL‐12p40) polymorphisms:
rs321227 AC/CC or CC vs AA, or C vs A 		Decreased
IL‐12 levels 		Increased risk of osteosarcoma61 and oesophageal60 and prostate63 cancers IL‐12/23 inhibitors may increase risk of osteosarcomas and bladder, cervical, oesophageal and prostate cancers
1188 AC vs AA Increased risk of bladder cancer62
rs2569254 GG vs AA Increased risk of cervical cancer64
IL‐12A (IL‐12p35) polymorphisms: rs568408 GA/AA or GA vs GG Decreased
IL‐12 levels 		Increased risk of oesophageal cancer60 and osteosarcoma61 IL‐12/23 inhibitors may increase risk of osteosarcomas and oesophageal cancer in specific patient populations
IL‐23R polymorphisms:
rs6682925 TC/CC or TG/GG or T>C( )rs1884444n T>G 		Loss of IL‐23 function Increased risk of oesophageal cancer,66 hepatocellular carcinoma,67 and acute myeloid leukaemia68
No association with risk of gastric cancer65
Decreased risk of gastric cancer65 		IL‐23 inhibitors may affect cancer risk of some cancers in specific patient populations
IL‐23 inhibitors may decrease risk of gastric cancer
Open in a new tab

IL, interleukin; R, receptor.

7. RISK OF MALIGNANCY IN ANIMAL MODELS SIMULATING NEUTRALIZATION OF IL‐12 AND/OR IL‐23

The malignancy data from animal models of IL‐23 deficiency are conflicting. Mice that had lost IL‐23 function via deficiencies in either IL‐23p19 or IL‐23R or by treatment with antibodies to IL‐23p19 showed resistance to skin tumor growth/development (Table 4).20 IL‐23–deficient mice70 and mice treated with anti–IL‐23p1971 have also been shown to have an increased resistance to melanoma‐induced lung metastases. Furthermore, in this model of melanoma‐induced metastases, anti–IL‐23 antibody used in combination with IL‐2 or anti‐erbB2 antibody significantly inhibited subcutaneous growth of established mammary carcinomas and suppressed established and spontaneous lung metastases.71 Deficiencies in IL‐23p19 or IL‐23R also resulted in decreased tumor multiplicity and growth in a mouse model of colorectal tumors.72 These findings suggest that IL‐23p19 inhibitors might prevent the growth and/or enhance the rejection of some tumors, possibly via effects on IL‐22, which has been implicated in the development of epithelial tumors.73, 74 A number of studies have found that increased levels of IL‐23 are associated with unfavourable outcomes in various malignancies in humans.75, 76, 77, 78, 79 In contrast, other studies suggest that IL‐23p19 deficiency might enhance the risk of certain cancers. For example, IL‐23–deficient mice demonstrated an increased risk of development of chemically induced melanoma.80 However, in a model of UV radiation, IL‐23–deficient mice demonstrated both an increased risk of developing sarcoma and a decreased risk of developing epithelial tumors compared with wild‐type mice.19 Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Table 4.

Malignancies in murine models of IL‐23 deficiency

Model Effect on IL‐23 Tumor‐promotion strategy Effect on malignancy vs controls Potential therapeutic implications for IL‐23 inhibitors
Treatment with anti–IL‐23p19 antibody20 Loss of IL‐23 function Intradermal injection of skin tumor cells Faster rejection of tumor cells and decreased tumor formation May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
Treatment with anti–IL‐23p19 antibody71 Loss of IL‐23 function Experimental and spontaneous models of lung metastases
SC injection of thymoma cells 		Early suppression of lung metastases and modest inhibition of primary tumors with subcutaneous growth May prevent tumor growth and metastasis
IL‐23p19 −/−[ 20 ] Loss of IL‐23 function Chemical carcinogenesis
Intradermal injection of skin tumor cells 		Resistance to developing skin papillomas
Resistance to developing tumors 		May reduce risk of skin cancer
May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
IL‐23p19 −/−[ 70 ] Loss of IL‐23 function Experimental model of lung metastases Increased resistance to formation of lung metastases May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
IL‐23p19 −/−[ 72 ] Loss of IL‐23 function Colorectal tumorigenesis in genetically predisposed mice Decreased tumor number and growth May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
IL‐23p19 −/−[ 19 ] Loss of IL‐23 function Skin UV radiation Increased probability of skin tumor development May increase risk of UV radiation–induced skin cancer
IL‐23p19 −/−[ 80 ] Loss of IL‐23 function Chemically induced melanoma
Chemically induced epithelial tumor 		Increased number and size of melanomas
Resistance to tumor development 		May increase risk of melanoma
May decrease risk of epithelial tumors
IL‐23R −/−[ 20 ] Loss of IL‐23 receptor function Intradermal injection of tumor cells Resistance to tumor development May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
IL‐23R −/−[ 72 ] Loss of IL‐23 receptor function Colorectal tumorigenesis in genetically predisposed mice Decreased tumor number and growth May prevent tumor growth and enhance tumor rejection
Open in a new tab

IL, interleukin; SC, subcutaneous; UV, ultraviolet.

Similarly, the studies on IL‐12 also show conflicting data. Several studies of mice with IL‐12–specific loss of function via deficiency in IL‐12p35 20 or IL‐12Rβ2 81 showed an increased risk of tumor development (Table 5), but, in models of UV radiation19 or chemically induced melanomas,80 IL‐12p35–deficient mice had the same risk of induced skin tumors as did their wild‐type counterparts.

Table 5.

Malignancies in murine models of IL‐12 deficiency

Model Effect on IL‐12 Tumor‐promotion strategy Effect on malignancy vs controls Potential therapeutic implications for IL‐12 inhibitors
IL‐12p35 −/−[ 83 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Spontaneous tumor development No effect No impact on malignancy
IL‐12p35 −/−[ 20 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Chemical carcinogenesis
Intradermal injection of skin tumor cells 		Earlier and more frequent skin papillomas
Increased incidence of skin tumors 		May increase risk of skin cancer
IL‐23p35 −/−[ 70 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Experimental model of lung metastases Increased formation of lung metastases May increase growth and reduce tumor rejection
IL‐12p35 −/−[ 100 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Skin UV radiation Increased number of skin tumors May increase risk of skin cancer
IL‐12p35 −/−[ 19 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Skin UV radiation No increased probability of skin tumor development May not affect risk of UV radiation–induced skin cancer
IL‐12p35 −/−[ 80 ] Loss of IL‐12 function Chemically induced melanomas
Chemically induced epithelial tumor 		Reduced number and size of melanomas
Increased tumor development 		May reduce risk of melanoma
May increase risk of epithelial tumors
IL‐12Rβ2 −/−[ 81 ] Loss of IL‐12 receptor function Spontaneous Increased susceptibility to spontaneous tumor formation, half of aged mice developed plasmacytoma or lung epithelial tumors May increase risk of cancer
Open in a new tab

IL, interleukin; UV, ultraviolet.

Mouse models with loss of function in both IL‐12 and IL‐23 via IL‐12/23p40 deficiency or treatment with anti–IL‐12/23p40 antibodies showed an increase,20, 21, 80 a decrease82 or no difference83 in tumor development (Table 6).

Table 6.

Malignancies in murine models of IL‐12/23p40 deficiency

Model Effect on IL‐12/23 Tumor‐promotion strategy Effect on malignancy vs controls Potential therapeutic implications for IL‐12/23p40 inhibitors
Treatment with anti–IL‐12/23p40 antibodies20 Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Intradermal injection of skin tumor cells Increased number and size of faster‐growing tumors May increase risk of cancer, tumor growth, and metastases
Treatment with anti–IL‐12p40 antibody71 Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Experimental and spontaneous models of lung metastases No effect No impact on malignancy
IL‐12/23p40 −/−[ 20 ] Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Chemical carcinogenesis
Intradermal injection of skin tumor cells 		Resistance to developing skin papillomas
Increased tumor incidence 		May reduce risk of skin cancer
May increase risk of skin cancer
IL‐23p40 −/−[ 70 ] Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Experimental model of lung metastases No effect No impact on malignancy
IL‐12/23p40 −/−[ 21 ] Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Skin UV radiation Increased skin tumor development May increase risk of UV radiation–induced skin carcinogenesis
IL‐12/23p40 −/−[ 82 ] Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Chemically induced skin tumors Resistance to skin tumor development May reduce risk of skin cancer
IL‐12/23p40 −/−[ 80 ] Loss of IL‐12 and IL‐23 function Chemically induced melanomas
Chemically induced epithelial tumor 		Increased number and size of melanomas
Increased number of epithelial tumors 		May increase risk of melanoma
May increase risk of epithelial tumors
Open in a new tab

IL, interleukin; UV, ultraviolet.

8. CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis and/or receiving treatment for psoriasis have an increased risk of cancer.8, 9, 49, 84 Inhibitors of IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 are effective treatment approaches for psoriasis.36, 38 Existing data provide evidence to support an association between impaired IL‐12 and/or IL‐23 signalling and both tumor growth and resistance to tumor growth, although the nature of these relationships is not fully understood. Long‐term postmarketing safety evaluations of agents targeting IL‐12/23 and IL‐23 are needed to fully appreciate the associated malignancy risk. The implications for therapeutic inhibition of IL‐12/23 or IL‐23 remain uncertain, although monitoring of patients for NMSC and malignancy seems warranted.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have declared no conflicting interests.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript. This work was partially supported by National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases 1R01AR071157‐01A1 to NY. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Catherine Champagne, of Fishawack Communications, and supported by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc.

Ergen EN, Yusuf N. Inhibition of interleukin‐12 and/or interleukin‐23 for the treatment of psoriasis: What is the evidence for an effect on malignancy? Exp Dermatol. 2018;27:737–747. 10.1111/exd.13676

REFERENCES

  • 1. Rachakonda T. D., Schupp C. W., Armstrong A. W., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 70, 512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Menter A., Gottlieb A., Feldman S. R., Van Voorhees A. S., Leonardi C. L., Gordon K. B., Lebwohl M., Koo J. Y., Elmets C. A., Korman N. J., Beutner K. R., Bhushan R., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2008, 58, 826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. de Korte J., Sprangers M. A., Mombers F. M., Bos J. D., J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 2004, 9, 140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kimball A. B., Guerin A., Tsaneva M., Yu A. P., Wu E. Q., Gupta S. R., Bao Y., Mulani P. M., J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2011, 25, 157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Yeung H., Takeshita J., Mehta N. N., Kimmel S. E., Ogdie A., Margolis D. J., Shin D. B., Attor R., Troxel A. B., Gelfand J. M., JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149, 1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Gelfand J. M., Troxel A. B., Lewis J. D., Kurd S. K., Shin D. B., Wang X., Margolis D. J., Strom B. L., Arch. Dermatol. 2007, 143, 1493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brauchli Y. B., Jick S. S., Miret M., Meier C. R., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2009, 129, 2604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chiesa Fuxench Z. C., Shin D. B., Ogdie Beatty A., Gelfand J. M.. JAMA Dermatol 2016, 152, 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Pouplard C., Brenaut E., Horreau C., Barnetche T., Misery L., Richard M. A., Aractingi S., Aubin F., Cribier B., Joly P., Jullien D., Le Maitre M., Ortonne J. P., Paul C., J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27(Suppl 3), 36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Reich K., Armstrong A. W., Foley P., Song M., Wasfi Y., Randazzo B., Li S., Shen Y. K., Gordon K. B., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 76, 418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Reich K., Papp K. A., Blauvelt A., Tyring S. K., Sinclair R., Thaci D., Nograles K., Mehta A., Cichanowitz N., Li Q., Liu K., La Rosa C., Green S., Kimball A. B., Lancet 2017, 390, 276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Hsieh C. S., Macatonia S. E., Tripp C. S., Wolf S. F., O'Garra A., Murphy K. M., Science 1993, 260, 547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kobayashi M., Fitz L., Ryan M., Hewick R. M., Clark S. C., Chan S., Loudon R., Sherman F., Perussia B., Trinchieri G., J. Exp. Med. 1989, 170, 827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Langrish C. L., Chen Y., Blumenschein W. M., Mattson J., Basham B., Sedgwick J. D., McClanahan T., Kastelein R. A., Cua D. J., J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Leonard J. P., Waldburger K. E., Goldman S. J., J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181, 381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Manetti R., Parronchi P., Giudizi M. G., Piccinni M. P., Maggi E., Trinchieri G., Romagnani S., J. Exp. Med. 1993, 177, 1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Parham C., Chirica M., Timans J., Vaisberg E., Travis M., Cheung J., Pflanz S., Zhang R., Singh K. P., Vega F., To W., Wagner J., O'Farrell A. M., McClanahan T., Zurawski S., Hannum C., Gorman D., Rennick D. M., Kastelein R. A., de Waal Malefyt R., Moore K. W., K. W. Moore. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 5699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Oppmann B., Lesley R., Blom B., Timans J. C., Xu Y., Hunte B., Vega F., Yu N., Wang J., Singh K., Zonin F., Vaisberg E., Churakova T., Liu M., Gorman D., Wagner J., Zurawski S., Liu Y., Abrams J. S., Moore K. W., Rennick D., de Waal‐Malefyt R., Hannum C., Bazan J. F., Kastelein R. A., Immunity 2000, 13, 715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Jantschitsch C., Weichenthal M., Proksch E., Schwarz T., Schwarz A., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Langowski J. L., Zhang X., Wu L., Mattson J. D., Chen T., Smith K., Basham B., McClanahan T., Kastelein R. A., Oft M., Nature 2006, 442, 461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Maeda A., Schneider S. W., Kojima M., Beissert S., Schwarz T., Schwarz A., Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 2962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Happel K. I., Dubin P. J., Zheng M., Ghilardi N., Lockhart C., Quinton L. J., Odden A. R., Shellito J. E., Bagby G. J., Nelson S., Kolls J. K., J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bongartz T., Sutton A. J., Sweeting M. J., Buchan I., Matteson E. L., Montori V., JAMA 2006, 295, 2275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Thierfelder W. E., van Deursen J. M., Yamamoto K., Tripp R. A., Sarawar S. R., Carson R. T., Sangster M. Y., Vignali D. A., Doherty P. C., Grosveld G. C., Ihle J. N., Nature 1996, 382, 171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Gaffen S. L., Jain R., Garg A. V., Cua D. J.. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014, 14, 585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Girolomoni G., Strohal R., Puig L., Bachelez H., Barker J., Boehncke W. H., Prinz J. C.. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2017, 31, 1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Lynde C. W., Poulin Y., Vender R., Bourcier M., Khalil S., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2014, 71, 141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nestle F. O., Kaplan D. H., Barker J., N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 361, 496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Szabo S. K., Hammerberg C., Yoshida Y., Bata‐Csorgo Z., Cooper K. D., J. Invest. Dermatol. 1998, 111, 1072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kulig P., Musiol S., Freiberger S. N., Schreiner B., Gyulveszi G., Russo G., Pantelyushin S., Kishihara K., Alessandrini F., Kundig T., Sallusto F., Hofbauer G. F., Haak S., Becher B., Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Gordon K. B., Langley R. G., Gottlieb A. B., Papp K. A., Krueger G. G., Strober B. E., Williams D. A., Gu Y., Valdes J. M., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2012, 132, 304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Leonardi C. L., Kimball A. B., Papp K. A., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Wang Y., Li S., Dooley L. T., Gordon K. B., investigators P. s., Lancet 2008, 371, 1665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Papp K. A., Langley R. G., Lebwohl M., Krueger G. G., Szapary P., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Hsu M. C., Wang Y., Li S., Dooley L. T., Reich K., P. s. investigators , Lancet 2008, 371, 1675.18486740 [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Reich K., Langley R. G., Papp K. A., Ortonne J. P., Unnebrink K., Kaul M., Valdes J. M., N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Sandborn W. J., Gasink C., Gao L. L., Blank M. A., Johanns J., Guzzo C., Sands B. E., Hanauer S. B., Targan S., Rutgeerts P., Ghosh S., de Villiers W. J., Panaccione R., Greenberg G., Schreiber S., Lichtiger S., Feagan B. G., N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1519.23075178 [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Janssen Biotech Inc. Stelara® (ustekinumab) prescribing information, https://www.stelarainfo.com/pdf/prescribinginformation.pdf (accessed: March 29, 2018).
  • 37. Puig L., Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol 2017, 13, 525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Janssen Biotech Inc. Tremfya™ (guselkumab) prescribing information, https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761061s000lbl.pdf (accessed: March 29, 2018).
  • 39. Papp K. A., Blauvelt A., Bukhalo M., Gooderham M., Krueger J. G., Lacour J. P., Menter A., Philipp S., Sofen H., Tyring S., Berner B. R., Visvanathan S., Pamulapati C., Bennett N., Flack M., Scholl P., Padula S. J., N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 376, 1551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Eli Lilly and Company . A study of LY3074828 in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02899988 (accessed: March 29, 2018).
  • 41. American Cancer Society . Cancer facts & figures 2017, https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2017.html (accessed: March 29, 2018).
  • 42. Griffiths C. E., Strober B. E., van de Kerkhof P., Ho V., Fidelus‐Gort R., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Xia Y., Zhou B., Li S., Dooley L. T., Goldstein N. H., Menter A., N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kimball A. B., Papp K. A., Wasfi Y., Chan D., Bissonnette R., Sofen H., Yeilding N., Li S., Szapary P., Gordon K. B., J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27, 1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Krueger G. G., Langley R. G., Leonardi C., Yeilding N., Guzzo C., Wang Y., Dooley L. T., Lebwohl M., N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Langley R. G., Papp K., Gottlieb A. B., Krueger G. G., Gordon K. B., Williams D., Valdes J., Setze C., Strober B., J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2013, 27, 1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Blauvelt A., Papp K. A., Griffiths C. E., Randazzo B., Wasfi Y., Shen Y. K., Li S., Kimball A. B., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2017, 76, 405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Siegel R. L., Miller K. D., Jemal A., CA Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Berlin J. A., Glasser S. C., Ellenberg S. S., Am. J. Public Health 2008, 98, 1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Moore T. J.. Safety perspectives: cancer risks of biological products for psoriasis, https://www.ismp.org/quarterwatch/safety-perspectives (accessed: March 29, 2018).
  • 50. Florek A. G., Nardone B., Thareja S., Tran G., Giles F. J., West D. P.. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 177, e220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Papp K., Gottlieb A. B., Naldi L., Pariser D., Ho V., Goyal K., Fakharzadeh S., Chevrier M., Calabro S., Langholff W., Krueger G., J. Drugs Dermatol. 2015, 14, 706. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Reich K., Mrowietz U., Radtke M. A., Thaci D., Rustenbach S. J., Spehr C., Augustin M., Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2015, 307, 875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Papp K. A., Griffiths C. E., Gordon K., Lebwohl M., Szapary P. O., Wasfi Y., Chan D., Hsu M. C., Ho V., Ghislain P. D., Strober B., Reich K., Investigators P., Investigators P., Investigators A., Br. J. Dermatol. 2013, 168, 844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Greenspan A., Marty‐Ethgen P., Fakharzadeh S., Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, 299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Nardone B., West D. P., Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, 296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Kwiek B., Schwartz R. A., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2016, 74, 1220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Cardenes M., Angel‐Moreno A., Fieschi C., Sologuren I., Colino E., Molines A., Garcia‐Laorden M. I., Campos‐Herrero M. I., Andujar‐Sanchez M., Casanova J. L., Rodriguez‐Gallego C., J. Med. Genet. 2010, 47, 635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Altare F., Lammas D., Revy P., Jouanguy E., Doffinger R., Lamhamedi S., Drysdale P., Scheel‐Toellner D., Girdlestone J., Darbyshire P., Wadhwa M., Dockrell H., Salmon M., Fischer A., Durandy A., Casanova J. L., Kumararatne D. S., J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Bustamante J., Boisson‐Dupuis S., Abel L., Casanova J. L., Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Tao Y. P., Wang W. L., Li S. Y., Zhang J., Shi Q. Z., Zhao F., Zhao B. S., J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 138, 1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wang J., Nong L., Wei Y., Qin S., Zhou Y., Tang Y., DNA Cell Biol. 2013, 32, 605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Ebadi N., Jahed M., Mivehchi M., Majidizadeh T., Asgary M., Hosseini S. A., Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014, 15, 7869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Winchester D. A., Till C., Goodman P. J., Tangen C. M., Santella R. M., Johnson‐Pais T. L., Leach R. J., Xu J., Zheng S. L., Thompson I. M., Lucia M. S., Lippmann S. M., Parnes H. L., Dluzniewski P. J., Isaacs W. B., De Marzo A. M., Drake C. G., Platz E. A., Prostate 2015, 75, 1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Han S. S., Cho E. Y., Lee T. S., Kim J. W., Park N. H., Song Y. S., Kim J. G., Lee H. P., Kang S. B., Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2008, 140, 71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Chen J., Lu Y., Zhang H., Ding Y., Ren C., Hua Z., Zhou Y., Deng B., Jin G., Hu Z., Xu Y., Shen H., Mol. Carcinog. 2010, 49, 862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Chu H., Cao W., Chen W., Pan S., Xiao Y., Liu Y., Gu H., Guo W., Xu L., Hu Z., Shen H., Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Xu Y., Liu Y., Pan S., Liu L., Liu J., Zhai X., Shen H., Hu Z., J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 48, 125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Qian X., Cao S., Yang G., Pan Y., Yin C., Chen X., Zhu Y., Zhuang Y., Shen Y., Hu Z., PLoS One 2013, 8, e55473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Zhou P., Lv G. Q., Wang J. Z., Li C. W., Du L. F., Zhang C., Li J. P., PLoS One 2011, 6, e22092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Teng M. W., Andrews D. M., McLaughlin N., von Scheidt B., Ngiow S. F., Moller A., Hill G. R., Iwakura Y., Oft M., Smyth M. J.. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 8328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Teng M. W., von Scheidt B., Duret H., Towne J. E., Smyth M. J., Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 2077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Grivennikov S. I., Wang K., Mucida D., Stewart C. A., Schnabl B., Jauch D., Taniguchi K., Yu G. Y., Osterreicher C. H., Hung K. E., Datz C., Feng Y., Fearon E. R., Oukka M., Tessarollo L., Coppola V., Yarovinsky F., Cheroutre H., Eckmann L., Trinchieri G., Karin M., Nature 2012, 491, 254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Lewis J. M., Burgler C. D., Freudzon M., Golubets K., Gibson J. F., Filler R. B., Girardi M., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 2824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Nardinocchi L., Sonego G., Passarelli F., Avitabile S., Scarponi C., Failla C. M., Simoni S., Albanesi C., Cavani A., Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Gangemi S., Minciullo P., Adamo B., Franchina T., Ricciardi G. R., Ferraro M., Briguglio R., Toscano G., Saitta S., Adamo V., J. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 113, 2122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Hu W. H., Chen H. H., Yen S. L., Huang H. Y., Hsiao C. C., Chuang J. H., J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 115, 208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Li J., Lau G., Chen L., Yuan Y. F., Huang J., Luk J. M., Xie D., Guan X. Y., PLoS One 2012, 7, e46264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Suzuki H., Ogawa H., Miura K., Haneda S., Watanabe K., Ohnuma S., Sasaki H., Sase T., Kimura S., Kajiwara T., Komura T., Toshima M., Matsuda Y., Shibata C., Sasaki I., Oncol. Lett. 2012, 4, 199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Trabert B., Eldridge R. C., Pfeiffer R. M., Shiels M. S., Kemp T. J., Guillemette C., Hartge P., Sherman M. E., Brinton L. A., Black A., Chaturvedi A. K., Hildesheim A., Berndt S. I., Safaeian M., Pinto L., Wentzensen N., Int. J. Cancer 2017, 140, 600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Nasti T. H., Cochran J. B., Vachhani R. V., McKay K., Tsuruta Y., Athar M., Timares L., Elmets C. A., J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Airoldi I., Di Carlo E., Cocco C., Sorrentino C., Fais F., Cilli M., D'Antuono T., Colombo M. P., Pistoia V., Blood 2005, 106, 3846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Sharma S. D., Meeran S. M., Katiyar N., Tisdale G. B., Yusuf N., Xu H., Elmets C. A., Katiyar S. K., Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 1970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Street S. E., Trapani J. A., MacGregor D., Smyth M. J., J. Exp. Med. 2002, 196, 129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Kimball A. B., Schenfeld J., Accortt N. A., Anthony M. S., Rothman K. J., Pariser D., Br. J. Dermatol. 2015, 173, 1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Kauffman C. L., Aria N., Toichi E., McCormick T. S., Cooper K. D., Gottlieb A. B., Everitt D. E., Frederick B., Zhu Y., Graham M. A., Pendley C. E., Mascelli M. A., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2004, 123, 1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Fragoulis G. E., Siebert S., McInnes I. B., Annu. Rev. Med. 2016, 67, 337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Panaccione R., Sandborn W. J., Gordon G. L., Lee S. D., Safdi A., Sedghi S., Feagan B. G., Hanauer S., Reinisch W., Valentine J. F., Huang B., Carcereri R., Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Gordon K. B., Duffin K. C., Bissonnette R., Prinz J. C., Wasfi Y., Li S., Shen Y. K., Szapary P., Randazzo B., Reich K., N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Papp K., Thaci D., Reich K., Riedl E., Langley R. G., Krueger J. G., Gottlieb A. B., Nakagawa H., Bowman E. P., Mehta A., Li Q., Zhou Y., Shames R., Br. J. Dermatol. 2015, 173, 930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Krueger J. G., Ferris L. K., Menter A., Wagner F., White A., Visvanathan S., Lalovic B., Aslanyan S., Wang E. E., Hall D., Solinger A., Padula S., Scholl P., J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2015, 136, 116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Singh S., Kroe‐Barrett R. R., Canada K. A., Zhu X., Sepulveda E., Wu H., He Y., Raymond E. L., Ahlberg J., Frego L. E., Amodeo L. M., Catron K. M., Presky D. H., Hanke J. H., MAbs. 2015, 7, 778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Eli Lilly and Company . Clinical development pipeline, https://www.lilly.com/discovery/pipeline (accessed: March 29, 2017).
  • 93. Langley R. G., Tsai T. F., Flavin S., Song M., Randazzo B., Wasfi Y., Jiang J., Li S., Puig L., Br. J. Dermatol. 2018, 178, 114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Kimball A. B., Gordon K. B., Langley R. G., Menter A., Chartash E. K., Valdes J., Arch. Dermatol. 2008, 144, 200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Gottlieb A. B., Leonardi C., Kerdel F., Mehlis S., Olds M., Williams D. A., Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Strober B. E., Crowley J. J., Yamauchi P. S., Olds M., Williams D. A., Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 165, 661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Reich K., Langley R. G., Lebwohl M., Szapary P., Guzzo C., Yeilding N., Li S., Hsu M. C., Griffiths C. E., Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 164, 862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sofen H., Smith S., Matheson R. T., Leonardi C. L., Calderon C., Brodmerkel C., Li K., Campbell K., Marciniak S. J. Jr, Wasfi Y., Wang Y., Szapary P., Krueger J. G., J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Kopp T., Riedl E., Bangert C., Bowman E. P., Greisenegger E., Horowitz A., Kittler H., Blumenschein W. M., McClanahan T. K., Marbury T., Zachariae C., Xu D., Hou X. S., Mehta A., Zandvliet A. S., Montgomery D., van Aarle F., Khalilieh S., Nature 2015, 521, 222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Meeran S. M., Punathil T., Katiyar S. K., J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Experimental Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES