Abstract
Magnetic layered van der Waals crystals are an emerging class of materials giving access to new physical phenomena, as illustrated by the recent observation of 2D ferromagnetism in Cr2Ge2Te6 and CrI3. Of particular interest in semiconductors is the interplay between magnetism and transport, which has remained unexplored. Here we report magneto-transport measurements on exfoliated CrI3 crystals. We find that tunneling conduction in the direction perpendicular to the crystalline planes exhibits a magnetoresistance as large as 10,000%. The evolution of the magnetoresistance with magnetic field and temperature reveals that the phenomenon originates from multiple transitions to different magnetic states, whose possible microscopic nature is discussed on the basis of all existing experimental observations. This observed dependence of the conductance of a tunnel barrier on its magnetic state is a phenomenon that demonstrates the presence of a strong coupling between transport and magnetism in magnetic van der Waals semiconductors.
Layered van der Waals compounds offer opportunities to visit new physical phenomena in two dimensional materials. Here the authors report large tunneling magnetoresistance through exfoliated CrI3 crystals and attribute its evolution to the multiple transitions to different magnetic states.
Introduction
Investigations of layered van der Waals compounds are revealing a wealth of electronic phenomena, which can be controlled by varying the material thickness at the atomic scale1–4. Among these compounds, magnetic van der Waals semiconductors5–19 have remained virtually unexplored. These materials possess a unique potential for new physical phenomena, because magnetism occurs spontaneously without the need to introduce magnetic dopants as done in conventional magnetic semiconductors20–22, allowing—at least in principle—perfect crystalline order to be preserved. Indeed, the potential of magnetic van der Waals semiconductors has been made apparent by very recent experiments showing the occurrence of 2D ferromagnetism in atomically thin layers of Cr2Ge2Te616 and CrI317. So far however, essentially no experiment has been done to probe the transport and opto-electronic properties of these materials, and it remains to be determined whether their behavior deviates from that of conventional semiconductors, i.e., whether magnetism causes new interesting physical phenomena to appear. This can be expected because ab initio calculations predict the valence and conduction band of several ferromagnetic van der Waals semiconductors to be fully spin polarized15,23–26, implying a very strong coupling between the magnetic state and other electronic properties. Here we investigate experimentally these issues by performing transport and optical measurements on nano-fabricated devices based on exfoliated CrI3 crystals. In all devices investigated we find a very large tunneling magnetoresistance—as large as 10,000%—originating from abrupt transitions between different magnetic states of CrI3 that shows directly how the transport and magnetic properties are strongly coupled.
Results
Semiconducting characteristics of CrI3 devices
Past studies5,6,10 have shown that CrI3 exhibits a transition to an anisotropic ferromagnetic state with easy axis perpendicular to the layers (Curie temperature Tc = 61 K), accompanied by a singular behavior of the magnetic susceptibility below T ~ 50 K suggestive of a transition to a more complex magnetic state that remains to be understood (Supplementary Note 2). In contrast to the magnetic properties, virtually nothing is known about the opto-electronic response of this material and—to start exploring it—we have fabricated and investigated different types of devices (Fig. 1a–d, see Methods section and Supplementary Note 3 for details of the fabrication process). Figure 1a, b shows the schematics and an optical microscope image of a structure with graphene contacts attached to the bottom of an exfoliated CrI3 crystal, which we realized to implement a field-effect transistor (the doped Si substrate acts as gate). The observed gate and bias dependence of the current are shown in Fig. 1e and its inset: they conform to the expected transistor behavior and indicate that transport in CrI3 is mediated by electrons in the conduction band (since the transistor turns on at positive gate voltages). Figure 1c, d shows a second type of devices with contacts connected on opposite sides of an exfoliated thin CrI3 crystal, enabling photocurrent measurements. The photocurrent sets in sharply when the photon energy exceeds 1.2 eV (Fig. 1f), corresponding to the CrI3 band-gap5,6. This value is consistent with that inferred from the CrI3 photoluminescence spectrum that peaks at the same energy (see red line in Fig. 1f). Notably, the magnitude of the photocurrent is comparable to that measured on analogous devices based on crystals of more established van der Waals semiconductors, such as WS227 or WSe228. In contrast to the field-effect transistors, whose resistance was found in all cases to become unmeasurably high below 100 K, the photocurrent in vertical junctions persists down to low temperature. This suggests that the measurement of vertical transport in the direction perpendicular to the layers is possible at low temperature, and may be used to probe phenomena of magnetic origin.
Tunneling transport in vertical junctions
We investigated vertical transport from room temperature down to T = 0.25 K, by measuring the I–V curves of devices such as the one in Fig. 1d. Representative data from one of these devices (Fig. 2a, thickness of CrI3 is ~7 nm, corresponding to ~10 monolayers) show strongly nonlinear I–V curves that are temperature independent for T < 20 K, whereas for larger T the current I at any given bias V increases with increasing temperature. The temperature evolution of the resistance R ( = V/I) measured at three different biases (V = 0.35 V, 0.5 V, and 0.7 V) is summarized in Fig. 2b: starting from room temperature, the resistance first increases in a thermally activated way down to T ~ 70 K (the typical value of activation energy found in different devices is Ea ~0.15 eV), where it starts to level off, and eventually saturates becoming temperature independent for T < 20 K.
The observed temperature independence indicates that for T < 20 K vertical transport is due to tunneling. Indeed, Fig. 2c shows that, for T < 20 K, ln(I/V2) scales proportionally to 1/V, the trend expected in the Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling regime29,30. This regime occurs when the electric field generated by the applied voltage tilts the bands in the semiconductor, allowing carriers to tunnel from the electrode into the material31 (see the inset of Fig. 2c). Increasing the electric field effectively decreases the barrier thickness and causes an exponential increase of current. Theory predicts:
1 |
where h is Planck’s constant, q the electron charge, d the barrier thickness, m* the effective mass and ϕB the barrier height determined by the distance between the Fermi energy in the contact and the edge of the conduction band in CrI3 (the transistor measurements in Fig. 1e imply that electrons—and not holes—are responsible for the vertical tunneling current). If the effective mass is taken to be equal to the free electron mass—a plausible assumption in view of the rather narrow bands of CrI310,23,24—we find that the barrier height is 0.25 eV, roughly comparable to the activation energy extracted from the measured temperature dependence of the resistance.
Large tunneling magnetoresistance in vertical junctions
Having established the mechanism of vertical transport and seen that measurements can be done well below the Curie temperature, we look at the effect of an applied magnetic field. The magnetoresistance measured at different temperatures between 10 and 65 K with the magnetic field applied perpendicular to the plane of CrI3 is shown in Fig. 3a–f (extra data are discussed in Supplementary Notes 4 and 5). Extremely large jumps are observed at low temperature, resulting in a total magnitude change up to 10,000% as B is increased from 0 to just above 2 T (Fig. 3a). The jumps pointed by the vertical arrows (J1, J2, and J3) are seen in all four measured devices. Jumps J2 and J3 occur at the same values of B irrespective of the CrI3 thickness, which in our experiments ranged from 5.5 to 14 nm (additional fine structure in the data depend on the specific device measured). Such a large magnetoresistance is striking as it is not commonly observed for electrons tunneling through non-magnetic materials. The sharp and well-defined values of applied magnetic field at which the resistance jumps are seen strongly suggest that the phenomenon originates from changes in the magnetic state of the CrI3 layers.
Magnetic states of CrI3 and tunneling magnetoresistance
Identifying the nature of the magnetic states responsible for the tunneling magnetoresistance, and checking consistency with the known magnetic properties of bulk CrI3 is subtle. We start addressing these issues by investigating how the magnetoresistance depends on temperature. Upon increasing T, the resistance jumps shift position (compare Fig. 3a, c), with J2 and J3 becoming less sharp (Fig. 3d), and all features eventually disappear around 50 K, well below the Curie temperature of CrI3 (Tc = 61 K) at which the magnetization of the material appears. More detailed information is obtained by looking at the dependence of the magnetoresistance on both temperature and magnetic field. The color plot in Fig. 4a clearly shows that the resistance jumps define three states (that we label as I, II, and III). For T lower than ~40 K the states are separated by clear boundaries in the B-T plane, and well-defined transitions are seen irrespective of whether the boundary is crossed by varying B at fixed T or by changing T at fixed B (as shown in Fig. 4b), as expected for veritable phase transitions. This confirms that different magnetic states in CrI3 are responsible for the observed magnetoresistance.
Determining the precise onset temperature for the occurrence of tunneling magnetoresistance is also instructive. For T > 40 K the jumps are rounded into kinks whose position can be determined as shown in Fig. 4c. By following their evolution in the B- and T-plane we find that jump J3 (see the red circles in Fig. 4a) and J1 (see Fig. 4d, the feature associated to the small field hysteretic behavior visible in Fig. 3) start at the same temperature, T ≅ 51 K (rounding prevents the precise evolution of jump J2 to be followed above 40 K). Notably, 51 K corresponds exactly to the temperature of the singular behavior observed in the magnetic susceptibility of bulk crystals (Supplementary Fig. 1), indicative of a transition to a complex magnetic state different from a simple ferromagnet. This quantitative agreement therefore suggests that one of the states responsible for the large tunneling magnetoresistance observed in the experiments is the same state that manifests itself in the magnetic properties of bulk CrI3. The relation between the properties of bulk crystals and magnetoresistance is however more complex, as shown by magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements.
MOKE measurements exhibit a behavior analogous to that observed in transport, with sharp jumps in Kerr angle that are seen upon the application of a magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of CrI3 layers (Faraday geometry;32 see Fig. 5a). The jumps occur precisely at the same B-values at which the J2 and J3 magnetoresistance jumps are found. At T = 5 K a well-developed hysteresis in the magnetoresistance measurements is observed upon sweeping B up and down, and the same hysteresis is seen in the measurements of Kerr angle. The evolution of the B-dependence of the Kerr angle upon increasing T (Fig. 5b, c) also resembles what is observed in the magnetoresistance, with the jumps in the two quantities shifting and smearing in a very similar way. All the trends that we observed are qualitatively identical to the one reported earlier in atomically thin layers17, which—after submission of this manuscript—have also been reported to exhibit a tunneling magnetoresistance virtually identical to the one reported here33,34.
In thin atomic layers, MOKE measurements have been interpreted in terms of individual crystalline planes of CrI3, antiferromagnetically coupled at B = 0, switching to a ferromagnetic ordering upon application of an external magnetic field. Switching from antiferro- to ferromagnetic coupling may account for the occurrence of sharp jumps in the tunneling magnetoresistance, but is at odds with bulk magnetic properties. Indeed, if transitions from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic ordering of CrI3 layers would occur in crystals of all thicknesses, very large jumps should be observed in the bulk magnetization. Direct measurements (Supplementary Fig. 1) however show a near complete saturation of bulk magnetization occurring already at B ~ 0.3 T, and no change at B ~ 0.9 T and ~1.8 T in correspondence of the magnetoresistance jumps.
We conclude that the comparison of different experiments (T- and B-dependence of the resistance, magnetic susceptibility, MOKE) indicate that the tunneling magnetoresistance originates from transitions in the magnetic state of CrI3. As for the details of the magnetic states involved, however, no simple interpretation straightforwardly reconciles all observations made on both bulk crystals and thin exfoliated layers. More work is needed to clarify this issue and two potentially important points are worth mentioning. One is that the evidence for the possible antiferromagnetic coupling proposed for exfoliated layers is inferred from the MOKE measurements, under the assumption of a direct relation between Kerr angle and total magnetization. However, it is known that in semiconducting systems a finite Kerr effect can be observed in the absence of a net magnetization as long as time reversal and inversion symmetry are broken35,36. Hence, transitions in the magnetic state without any change in magnetization (see illustrative examples in Supplementary Fig. 8 and discussion in Supplementary Note 6) could—at least in principle—cause jumps in Kerr rotation. This implies that to establish conclusively that an antiferromagnetic coupling is present it is very important to measure the magnetization of atomically thin CrI3 layers directly without simply relying on MOKE.
A second point to be made is that the jumps observed in MOKE and magnetoresistance could indeed originate from an antiferromagnetic coupling of adjacent CrI3 layers, but that interlayer antiferromagnetism only occurs in an interfacial region close to the crystal surface. If sufficiently thin, such an interfacial region would not be detected in bulk magnetization measurements, explaining why no magnetization jump is observed at 0.9 T and 1.8 T. Our observations that magnetoresistance occurs always at the same magnetic field values irrespective of applied bias, polarity, and thickness of the CrI3 flake up to 20 monolayers indicate that if an interfacial region is invoked, this region is rather thick. We estimate that crystals between 10 and 20 monolayers thick are still fully antiferromagnetically coupled, and understanding why such thick crystals exhibit a behavior that is very different from the one observed in the bulk is not obvious. One possibility is that the crystal structure of exfoliated layers in the surface region is different from that of bulk crystals. Interestingly, ab initio calculations show that if individual layers are stacked according to the high-temperature crystalline phase of CrI3, an antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling is energetically favorable as compared to the ferromagnetic coupling found in the low-temperature crystalline structure (see Supplementary Fig. 9 and discussion in Supplementary Note 7).
Coupling between magnetic state and tunneling resistance
Irrespective of the microscopic details of the underlying magnetic structure, finding that a step-like large modulation in the tunneling resistance of a magnetic insulator can be induced by a change in its magnetic state is a physical phenomenon that has not been reported earlier. It is therefore useful to look in detail at the I–V curves of our devices to see whether the experiments provide any indication as to the microscopic mechanism responsible for the change in tunneling resistance in the different magnetic states. This is done in Fig. 6a where ln(I/V2) is plotted versus 1/V for many different values of magnetic field. It is apparent that for different magnetic field intervals (I: 0–0.9 T; II: 1–1.8 T; III: 1.9–3 T) the I–V curves collapse on top of each other. In all cases the overall behavior is consistent with that expected from FN tunneling, but with a constant of proportionality between ln(I/V2) and 1/V (i.e., the slope of the three dashed lines in Fig. 6a) that is different in the three cases.
Microscopically, the constant of proportionality between ln(I/V2) and 1/V is determined by the transmission probability, i.e., to the extinction of the electron wavefunction tunneling through the CrI3 barrier. Within the simplest model of a uniform (i.e. layer independent) gap of CrI3, this quantity is determined by the electron effective mass and by the height of the tunnel barrier (Eq. (1)). Using Eq. (1) under the assumption that the effective mass remains unchanged, we can extract the height of the tunnel barrier from the slope of the ln(I/V2) versus 1/V relation. We find that—as shown in Fig. 6b—the barrier height is different in different magnetic states. The effect can be due to either a change in the band-gap or in the work-function of CrI3, consistently with ab initio calculations which shows that the occurrence of magnetism is accompanied by a modification in the material band structure10,23,24.
A similar conclusion—namely that different magnetic states have different transmission probability because of a difference in tunnel barrier height—holds true even if the change in tunneling magnetoresistance is due to a switch from an antiferromagnetic to a ferromagnetic interlayer ordering of the magnetization. The simplest model to describe this scenario consists in assuming that each layer has different barrier height for spin up and down37,38 (i.e., the height of the tunnel barrier is not spatially uniform). Calculations based on this model lead to I–V curves that also approximately satisfy Fowler-Nordheim behavior, with proportionality constant between ln(I/V2) versus 1/V that is different for a ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic alignment of the magnetization in the individual CrI3 layers (Supplementary Fig. 10). This behavior is easy to understand qualitatively, because—despite not being spatially uniform—the average height of the tunnel barrier for the tunneling process that gives the dominant contribution to the current also depends on the magnetic state. Specifically, for ferromagnetic alignment, tunneling is dominated by the majority spin and the barrier height is the same—the smallest possible—in all layers. For antiferromagnetic coupling, electrons experience a barrier height that is alternating (depending on the layer) between the value expected for majority and minority spins, larger on average that the height experienced by the majority spins in the case of ferromagnetic alignment. These considerations imply that—at least at the simplest level—the analysis of the FN tunneling regime in the measured I–V curves cannot discriminate between different magnetic states. Nevertheless, they also do indicate that the magnetic state is coupled to the band structure, which is why the height of the tunnel barrier depends on the specific magnetic state.
Discussion
The observation that the tunneling conductance through a CrI3 barrier depends strongly on the magnetic state of the material—a phenomenon that had not be observed previously in other systems—showcases the richness of physical phenomena hosted by van der Waals semiconductors. So far, these materials have attracted attention mainly for their opto-electronic and transport properties, but it is becoming apparent that their magneto-electronic response also exhibits fascinating and possibly unique properties. Inasmuch as CrI3 is concerned, future experiments should identify which other electronic phenomena, besides the tunneling conductance, are strongly affected by the magnetic state of the material. They should also aim at improving the quality of field-effect transistors (whose operation for CrI3 has been demonstrated here) to enable the investigation of gate-controlled transport at low temperature, in the magnetic state of the material. Obviously, however, experiments should be performed on a broader class of van der Waals magnetic systems, starting with those for which past measurements of the bulk magnetic response indicate the occurrence of transitions between states that can be controlled by the application of an experimentally reachable magnetic field.
After the submission of our manuscript different preprints have appeared on the cond-mat archive reporting observations closely related to the ones discussed here (refs. 33,34,39).
Methods
Crystal growth
High-quality crystals of CrI3 have been grown by the chemical vapor transport method in a horizontal gradient tubular furnace. To avoid degradation of the precursors and synthesized crystals the 1:3 mixture of Cr and I was sealed in a quartz tube (later placed in the furnace) under inert conditions (Supplementary Note 1).
Sample fabrication
Multilayer graphene, h-BN (10–30 nm) and few-layer CrI3 flakes were exfoliated in a nitrogen gas filled glove box with a < 0.5 ppm concentration of oxygen and water to avoid degradation of the few-layer CrI3 crystals, which are very sensitive to ambient conditions (Supplementary Note 3). The heterostructures were then assembled in the same glove box with a conventional pick-up and release technique based on either PPC/PDMS or PC/PDMS polymer stacks placed on glass slides. Once encapsulated, the multilayer graphene electrodes were contacted electrically by etching the heterostructures by means of reactive ion etching (in a plasma of a CF4/O2 mixture) followed by evaporation of a 10 nm/50 nm Cr/Au thin film.
Transport measurements
Transport measurements were performed either in a Heliox 3He insert system (Oxford Instruments, base temperature of 0.25 K) equipped with a 14 T superconducting magnet, or in the variable temperature insert of a cryofree Teslatron cryostat (Oxford Instruments, base temperature of 1.5 K) equipped with a 12 T superconducting magnet. The latter system is also equipped with a sample rotator making it possible to align the sample so that the magnetic field is either parallel or perpendicular to the CrI3 layers. The I–V curves and magnetoresistance were measured with a Keithley 2400 source/measure unit and/or home-made low-noise voltage sources and current amplifiers.
Optical measurements and MOKE
Photoluminescence measurements were performed in a home tailored confocal micro-photoluminescence setup in back-scattering geometry (i.e., collecting the emitted light with the same microscope used to couple the laser beam onto the device). The light collected from the sample was sent to a Czerny–Turner monochromator and detected with a liquid nitrogen cooled Si CCD-array (Andor emCCD). The sample was illuminated with the 647.1 nm laser line of an Ar–Kr laser at a power of 30 µW. The data were corrected to account for the nonlinear CCD response in this spectral region. The same setup was used for the photocurrent measurement but in this case the devices were illuminated using a Fianium supercontinuum laser coupled to a monochromator, providing a beam of tunable wavelength with spectral width of 2 nm and stabilized power.
The magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE) measurements were performed in a cryostat with a 12 T superconducting split-coil magnet. The sample was illuminated with linear polarized light at 632.8 nm and 50 µW provided by a power stabilized HeNe laser. The reflected beam was split using a polarizing beam splitter cube and the s- and p-components measured simultaneously with Si-photodiodes and lock-in detection. A linear contribution to the measured Kerr angle, which stems from Faraday rotation in the cold objective lens, has been measured independently and was subtracted from the data in order to obtain the traces shown in Fig. 4.
Data availability
All relevant data are available from the corresponding authors on request.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge A. Ferreira for continuous technical support, D.-K. Ki for fruitful discussions, and A. Ubaldini for early work on the growth of CrI3 crystals. Z.W. thanks C. Handschin for sharing his experience in device fabrication. Z.W., I.G.-L., and A.F.M. gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the NCCR QSIT and the EU Graphene Flagship Project. N.U. and M.G. gratefully acknowledge support through an Ambizione fellowship of the Swiss National Science Foundation. M.K. and A.I. acknowledge NCCR QSIT for financial support. K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental Strategy Initiative conducted by the MEXT, Japan and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP15K21722.
Author contributions
Z.W. fabricated the devices with the collaboration of I.G.-L., Z.W. performed the transport measurements and analyzed the data, N.U. performed photoluminescence and photocurrent measurements. M.K. carried out the optical Kerr measurements with help of N.U.; M.K. and A.I. participated in discussion of the Kerr measurements. E.G. grew and characterized the CrI3 crystals. M.G. contributed to the discussion of the possible magnetic states of CrI3 and performed ab initio calculations to identify when the interlayer coupling is antiferromagnetic. T.T. and K.W. provided hBN crystals. A.F.M. initiated and supervised the project. Z.W., I.G.-L., N.U., M.G., and A.F.M. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. All authors discussed the results.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41467-018-04953-8.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Zhe Wang, Email: zhe.wang@unige.ch.
Alberto F. Morpurgo, Email: Alberto.Morpurgo@unige.ch
References
- 1.Castro Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. The electronic properties of graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009;81:109–162. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang QH, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kis A, Coleman JN, Strano MS. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotech. 2012;7:699–712. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Xu X, Yao W, Xiao D, Heinz TF. Spin and pseudospins in layered transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:343–350. doi: 10.1038/nphys2942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Novoselov KS, Mishchenko A, Carvalho A, Castro Neto AH. 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures. Science. 2016;353:aac9439. doi: 10.1126/science.aac9439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dillon JF, Olson CE. Magnetization resonance and optical properties of ferromagnet CrI3. J. Appl. Phys. 1965;36:1259–1260. doi: 10.1063/1.1714194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dillon JF, Kamimura H, Remeika JP. Magneto-optical properties of ferromagnetic chromium trihalides. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 1966;27:1531–1549. doi: 10.1016/0022-3697(66)90148-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Carteaux V, Moussa F, Spiesser M. 2D ising-like ferromagnetic behavior for the lamellar Cr2Si2Te6 compound: a neutron-scattering investigation. Europhys. Lett. 1995;29:251–256. doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/29/3/011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Li X, Cao T, Niu Q, Shi JR, Feng J. Coupling the valley degree of freedom to antiferromagnetic order. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:3738–3742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219420110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sachs B, Wehling TO, Novoselov KS, Lichtenstein AI, Katsnelson MI. Ferromagnetic two-dimensional crystals: single layers of K2CuF4. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;88:201402. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.201402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McGuire MA, Dixit H, Cooper VR, Sales BC. Coupling of crystal structure and magnetism in the layered, ferromagnetic insulator CrI3. Chem. Mater. 2015;27:612–620. doi: 10.1021/cm504242t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sivadas N, Daniels MW, Swendsen RH, Okamoto S, Xiao D. Magnetic ground state of semiconducting transition-metal trichalcogenide monolayers. Phys. Rev. B. 2015;91:235425. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.235425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Du KZ, et al. Weak van der Waals stacking, wide-range band gap, and raman study on ultrathin layers of metal phosphorus trichalcogenides. ACS Nano. 2016;10:1738–1743. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b05927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.May AF, Calder S, Cantoni C, Cao HB, McGuire MA. Magnetic structure and phase stability of the van der Waals bonded ferromagnet Fe3-xGeTe2. Phys. Rev. B. 2016;93:014411. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014411. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee S, Choi KY, Lee S, Park BH, Park JG. Tunneling transport of mono- and few-layers magnetic van der Waals MnPS3. Apl. Mater. 2016;4:086108. doi: 10.1063/1.4961211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin MW, et al. Ultrathin nanosheets of CrSiTe3: a semiconducting two-dimensional ferromagnetic material. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2016;4:315–322. doi: 10.1039/C5TC03463A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gong C, et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature. 2017;546:265–269. doi: 10.1038/nature22060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Huang B, et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature. 2017;546:270–273. doi: 10.1038/nature22391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhong D, et al. Van der Waals engineering of ferromagnetic semiconductor heterostructures for spin and valleytronics. Sci. Adv. 2017;3:e1603113. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1603113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xing W, et al. Electric field effect in multilayer Cr2Ge2Te6: a ferromagnetic 2D material. 2D Mater. 2017;4:024009. doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/aa7034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Furdyna JK. Diluted magnetic semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 1988;64:R29–R64. doi: 10.1063/1.341700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.MacDonald AH, Schiffer P, Samarth N. Ferromagnetic semiconductors: moving beyond (Ga,Mn)As. Nat. Mater. 2005;4:195. doi: 10.1038/nmat1325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dietl T, Ohno H. Dilute ferromagnetic semiconductors: physics and spintronic structures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2014;86:187–251. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang H, Eyert V, Schwingenschlögl U. Electronic structure and magnetic ordering of the semiconducting chromium trihalides CrCl3, CrBr3, and CrI3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2011;23:116003. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/11/116003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu JY, Sun Q, Kawazoe Y, Jena P. Exfoliating biocompatible ferromagnetic Cr-trihalide monolayers. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:8777–8784. doi: 10.1039/C5CP04835D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang WB, Qu Q, Zhua P, Lam CH. Robust intrinsic ferromagnetism and half semiconductivity in stable two-dimensional single-layer chromium trihalides. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2015;3:12457–12468. doi: 10.1039/C5TC02840J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Li XX, Yang JL. CrXTe3 (X = Si, Ge) nanosheets: two dimensional intrinsic ferromagnetic semiconductors. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2014;2:7071–7076. doi: 10.1039/C4TC01193G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yu WJ, et al. Highly efficient gate-tunable photocurrent generation in vertical heterostructures of layered materials. Nat. Nanotech. 2013;8:952. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Britnell L, et al. Strong light-matter interactions in heterostructures of atomically thin films. Science. 2013;340:1311–1314. doi: 10.1126/science.1235547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fowler RH, Nordheim L. Electron emission in intense electric fields. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 1928;119:173–181. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1928.0091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lenzlinger M, Snow EH. Fowler-nordheim tunneling into thermally grown SiO2. J. Appl. Phys. 1969;40:278–283. doi: 10.1063/1.1657043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sze S. M. & Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd edn (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2007).
- 32.Palik ED, Furdyna JK. Infrared and microwave magnetoplasma effects in semiconductors. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1970;33:1193–1322. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/33/3/307. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Song, T., et al. Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in spin-filter van der Waals heterostructures. Science360, 1214–1218 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 34.Klein, D. R., et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science, 360, 1214–1218 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Feng W, Guo GY, Zhou J, Yao Y, Niu Q. Large magneto-optical Kerr effect in noncollinear antiferromagnets Mn3X (X = Rh, Ir, Pt) Phys. Rev. B. 2015;92:144426. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.144426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sivadas N, Okamoto S, Xiao D. Gate-controllable magneto-optic Kerr effect in layered collinear antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016;117:267203. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.267203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Worledge D, Geballe T. Magnetoresistive double spin filter tunnel junction. J. Appl. Phys. 2000;88:5277–5279. doi: 10.1063/1.1315619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miao GX, Müller M, Moodera JS. Magnetoresistance in double spin filter tunnel junctions with nonmagnetic electrodes and its unconventional bias dependence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102:076601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.076601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kim, H. H., et al. One million percent tunnel magnetoresistance in a magnetic van der Waals heterostructure. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.00028 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are available from the corresponding authors on request.