Table 2.
GRADE Evidence Profile: Common Cold (Acetylcysteine and Carbocysteine for Acute Upper and Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Children)14
Quality Assessment |
No. of Patients |
Effect |
Quality | Importance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of Studies | Design | Risk of Bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication Bias | AC or CC | Placebo | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute | ||
Cough after 6-7 d | ||||||||||||
3 studies N = 139 |
RCT | Seriousa | No serious risk | Seriousb | Seriousc | Undetected | 74 | 65 | 0.37 (95% CI, 0.12-1.20) | 10% (–19% to –1%) | Very Low |
Question: Is there evidence of clinically relevant treatment effects for acetylcysteine and carbocysteine in reducing the duration of cough?
Settings: Many studies included only hospitalized patients.
AC = acetylcysteine; CC = carbocysteine; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Studies have an overall high risk of bias.
Many patients were hospitalized, which is not routine in common cold, and included subjects with bronchitis and acute lower respiratory tract infections.
Studies were very small and even when combined contributed only 139 total subjects.