Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 26;17(4):447–460. doi: 10.1007/s12311-018-0930-9

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Group analysis of cerebellar data displayed on the SUIT template. The upper two rows show stimulus specific differences in activation after nociceptive stimulation of thumb or toe found with the thumb > toe contrast (first row) and toe > thumb contrast (second row). Conjunction results are shown in the third row and represent the overlap of activation found after nociceptive stimulation of thumb or toe. Slices are arranged from inferior (Z = − 56) to superior (Z = − 8) and L = left and R = right. A threshold of p = 0.005 was used (n = 16)