Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2018 Jun;47(2):275–297. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2018.02.007

Genetics of Cushing’s syndrome

Laura C Hernández-Ramírez 1, Constantine A Stratakis 1
PMCID: PMC6029257  NIHMSID: NIHMS958691  PMID: 29754632

Synopsis

The knowledge on the molecular and genetic causes of Cushing’s syndrome (CS) has greatly increased in the recent years. Somatic mutations leading to overactivation of the 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) and wingless-type MMTV integration site family (WNT)/beta-catenin (CTNNB1) pathways are the main molecular mechanisms underlying adrenocortical tumorigenesis causing CS. In the pituitary gland, corticotropinomas are characterized by resistance to glucocorticoid negative feedback, dysregulation of pathways controlling cell cycle progression and overexpression of pathways that sustain overactive ACTH production and secretion. Most of the patients with CS present sporadically, while isolated or syndromic familial forms of CS are quite infrequent. Nevertheless, recognizing the germline and somatic genetic defects behind corticotroph and adrenocortical tumorigenesis proves crucial for tailoring the clinical management of the patients and for designing strategies for genetic counselling and clinical screening to be applied in the routine medical practice.

Keywords: Cushing’s syndrome, glucocorticoids, ACTH, corticotropinoma, pituitary adenoma, adrenal hyperplasia, cAMP, USP8

Introduction

Characterized by multisystemic manifestations of hypercortisolemia, endogenous Cushing’s syndrome (CS) is caused in two-thirds of cases by an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma (corticotropinoma), and in up to one-quarter of cases by benign adrenal lesions, while other causes are more infrequent.1 CS may have a familial presentation, as part of various syndromes of multiple neoplasia, or present sporadically in the presence of specific germline and/or somatic gene defects (Table 1). A vast progress has been achieved in the recent years on identifying the molecular and genetic causes of CS of adrenal and pituitary (Cushing’s disease, CD) origin. In this review, we have compiled and summarized the most relevant genetic causes of adrenal and pituitary CS so far described.

Table 1.

Causes of endogenous Cushing’s syndrome and their genetic bases

Origin Lesion type General molecular mechanisms Clinical presentation Known genetic causes
Cushing’s disease (60–70% of cases) Corticotropinoma Resistance to glucocorticoid negative feedback, cell cycle dysregulation, overexpression of membrane receptors (arginine-vasopressin receptors, epidermal growth factor receptor) Sporadic Cushing’s disease, no associated manifestations Somatic USP8 GOF hotspot mutations
Somatic GNAS GOF mutations (codon 201 or 227)
Somatic RASD1 LOF mutation
Carney complex Germline PRKAR1A LOF mutations/deletions, uncharacterized defect in 2p16, PRKACB amplification
Familial isolated pituitary adenoma Germline AIP LOF mutations/deletions, unknown genetic defect in 80% of cases
Familial CD with very low penetrance? Germline CABLES1 LOF mutations
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 Germline MEN1 LOF mutations/deletions
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Germline RET LOF mutations/deletions
Pheocromocytoma/paraganglioma and pituitary adenoma
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 Germline CDKN1B LOF mutations/deletions
Tuberous sclerosis Germline TSC1 or TSC2 LOF mutations
Ectopic ACTH secretion (5–10% of cases) and ectopic CRH secretion (very rare) Medullary thyroid carcinoma Production of ACTH or CRH by tumoral neuroendocrine tissue Isolated medullary thyroid carcinoma RET LOF mutations
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2
Other malignant neuroendocrine tumors (bronchial endocrine tumor, small cell lung cancer, others) Isolated small cell lung cancer Loss of 3p23-p21, somatic TP53 and RB1 LOF mutation, others
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 Germline MEN1 LOF mutations/deletions
Benign neuroendocrine tumors (pheochromocytoma, others) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Germline RET LOF mutations/deletions
Neurofibromatosis type 1 Germline NF1 LOF mutations
Von Hippel-Lindau disease Germline VHL LOF mutations
Isolated paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2, FH, MAX, TMEM127 LOF mutations
Adrenal (primary) (20–30% of cases) Cortisol-producing adenoma Overactivation of the cAMP and WNT/CTNNB1 pathways, overexpression of steroidogenic enzymes Sporadic Cushing’s syndrome, no associated manifestations Somatic PRKACA GOF hotspot mutations, somatic CTNNB1 LOF mutations
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 MEN1 LOF mutations/deletions
Familial adenomatous polyposis and Gardner’s syndrome Germline APC LOF mutations
Primary multinodular adrenal hyperplasia (PMAH) Ectopic GPCR and ACTH expression, overactivation of the cAMP and WNT/CTNNB1 pathways, overexpression of steroidogenic enzymes Sporadic Cushing’s syndrome, no associated manifestations Germline and somatic ARMC5 LOF mutations
Somatic GIPR amplification
Somatic MC2R mutations
Germline PRKACA amplification
Primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD) Overactivation of the cAMP pathway Sporadic Cushing’s syndrome, no associated manifestations (isolated PPNAD) Germline PRKAR1A LOF mutations/deletions, uncharacterized defect in 2p16, germline PDE11A LOF mutations
Carney complex Germline PRKAR1A LOF mutations/deletions, uncharacterized defect in 2p16, PRKACB amplification
Isolated micronodular adrenal disease (iMAD) Sporadic Cushing’s syndrome, no associated manifestations Germline PDE8B LOF mutation
Germline PDE11A LOF mutations
Germline PRKACA amplifications
Primary bimorphic adrenocortical disease McCune-Albright syndrome Mosaic GNAS GOF mutation (codon 201)
Adrenocortical carcinoma Impaired TP53/RB1 signaling and chromatin remodeling, overactivation of the WNT/CTNNB1 pathway Familial adenomatous polyposis Germline APC LOF mutations
Sporadic Cushing’s syndrome, no associated manifestations Somatic ZNRF3, APC, CTNNB1, CDKN2A, CDK4, RB1, MDM2, TP53, MEN1, DAXX, and ATRX mutations
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome 11p15.5 maternal rearrangements, paternal uniparental disomy, abnormal methylation, germline CDKN1C and WTX LOF mutations
Li-Fraumeni syndrome Germline TP53 LOF mutations
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 MEN1 LOF mutations/deletions
Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome Germline CREBBP or EP300 LOF mutations

See references in text. GOF, gain-of-function; GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor; LOF, loss-of-function.

Genetic alterations in Cushing’s syndrome of adrenal origin

Somatic activating CTNN1B mutations

In mice, beta-catenin (Ctnn1b) has an important role in driving embryonic adrenocortical cell proliferation, and its constitutive activation results in adrenocortical hyperplasia.2 Nuclear and cytoplasmic accumulation of the CTNN1B protein are common findings in human benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors of various types, and these lesions often display somatic mutations in the CTNNB1 gene (located on chromosome 3p22.1).36 Within cortisol-producing adenomas (CPAs), the frequency of CTNN1B mutations is around 15%, while two-thirds of nonfunctioning adenomas and one-third of adrenocortical carcinomas carry these genetic defects, which are apparently associated with a more aggressive phenotype.3, 4, 7 Most of the patients carry a missense mutation affecting the residue S45, which prevents phosphorylation of the protein by the “destruction complex” (see below), resulting in protein accumulation and activation of its target genes, and therefore resulting in constitutive activation of the wingless-type MMTV integration site family (WNT)/CTNNB1 pathway.7 Beyond CTNNB1 sequence mutations, CTNN1B accumulation may also be due to overactivation of the 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) pathway, as it occurs in most adrenocortical lesions.3

Familial adenomatous polyposis

Germline loss-of-function mutations in the APC gene (on chromosome 5q22.2) are associated with adrenocortical adenomas or primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (PMAH) in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis; however, this gene does not seem to play a significant role in sporadic CS.8, 9 APC-mutated tumors display cytoplasmic and nuclear CTNNB1 accumulation. The APC protein forms part, together with other tumor suppressors and protein kinases, of the “destruction complex”, which regulates the WNT/CTNNB1 signaling pathway by targeting and directing CTNNB1 to proteasomal degradation.2 Therefore, APC loss-of-function results in constitutive activation of the WNT/CTNNB1 pathway, in a way that is similar to that of CTNNB1 mutations.

Activating somatic PRKACA hotspot mutations

Adrenal CS is most often caused by CPAs and one to two-thirds of these tumors bear the somatic recurrent mutation p.L206R in the PRKACA gene (on chromosome 19p13.12), encoding the catalytic subunit alpha of PKA.1013 The functional effect of the L206R mutation is constitutive activation of the cAMP/PKA molecular pathway and therefore increased steroidogenesis, given that these mutations affect a site of the protein that is essential for its interaction with the regulatory subunits of PKA.10, 11, 13 The mutation p.L199_C200insW, found in one CPA case, has a similar effect.10 In addition, germline amplification of the 19p13.2-p13.12 chromosomal region was identified in five cases of CS from four different families.10 In these patients, an apparent dosage-dependent effect on the phenotype was observed, as gene triplications were associated with a younger age at disease onset, compared with duplications. These patients developed different types of adrenocortical lesions, including primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (PPNAD), isolated micronodular adrenocortical disease (iMAD) and PMAH, and one patient developed breast cancer.14

Germline defects in phosphodiesterases

Phosphodiesterases are negative regulators of cAMP and 3′, 5′-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-dependent intracellular signaling, with multiple isoforms that display differential tissue and substrate specificity. A genome-wide association study identified germline inactivating mutations in the phosphodiesterase 11A gene (PDE11A, 2q31.2) in four patients with CS due to iMAD, including two affected individuals from the same kindred.15 Later on, a germline missense mutation in the PDE8B gene was identified in an additional iMAD patient. PDE11A is a dual-specificity phosphodiesterase (i.e., it hydrolyzes both cAMP and cGMP), while PDE8B is cAMP-specific.16 Both phosphodiesterases are highly expressed (although not exclusively) in the adrenal tissue, and the mutations found in iMAD lead to increased cAMP signaling, in a similar way than PRKACA gain-of-function and other cAMP defects identified in adrenal tumors.17

Germline and somatic ARMC5 mutations

Loss-of-function mutations in the armadillo repeat containing 5 gene (ARMC5) are the most common genetic cause of CS due to PMAH. Around 26–55% patients bear ARMC5 mutations (on chromosome 16p11.2) at both the somatic and the germline levels; within the PMAH tissue, different ARMC5 mutations can be found in each nodule1821 ARMC5 encodes a ubiquitously expressed pro-apoptotic protein, with an additional role as a regulator of steroidogenesis, as demonstrated in vitro.18, 22 In mice, Armc5 is required for gastrulation and its knockout is lethal, while haploinsufficiency leads to late-onset CS.23 Presentation in ARMC5 mutation-associated PMAH may be sporadic or familial (autosomal dominant).24, 25 Patients with ARMC5 mutations have higher midnight serum cortisol, as well as higher urinary 17-hydroxycorticosteroids and free cortisol levels during the 6-day test Liddle, and their nodules are larger and more numerous, compared with other PMAH patients.19, 20

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma

Fumarate accumulation, as a result of fumarate hydratase (FH) deficiency, leads to pseudohypoxia, a well-known pro-tumorigenic stimulus.26, 27 Loss-of function mutations in the FH gene (1q43) cause an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by the association of cutaneous leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma. Other tumors less frequently observed in these patients are leiomyosarcomas, uterine leiomyomas and papillary renal carcinomas, and, occasionally, PMAH (8% of patients).28, 29 Loss of the normal allele has been demonstrated in the PMAH tissue, supporting the causative role of FH in these lesions; however, FH mutations have not been associated to sporadic PMAH.8, 28

Somatic GIPR microduplications

The finding of local ACTH production and aberrant GPCR expression as stimuli driving steroidogenesis in PMAH brings attention to the role of ectopic hormone signaling in adrenal tumorigenesis.27, 30 Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)-dependent CS is a rare condition in which ectopic GIP receptor (GIPR) expression in PMAH or CPA tissue leads to hypercortisolemia in response to the physiological posprandial release of GIP by the small bowel. A recent study identified somatic duplications of the 19q13.32 chromosomal region, including the GIPR gene, in 3/14 patients with GIP-dependent CS.31 In two of these cases, rearrangements favoring the monoallelic expression of GIPR were identified, and among the genes contained in the amplified region, only GIPR was consistently overexpressed in the adrenocortical lesions. GIPR overexpression leads to increased steroidogenesis via overactivation of the cAMP/PKA pathway.

Gain-of-function germline MC2R mutations

A germline mutation (p.F278C), in the MC2R gene (on chromosome 18p11.21), encoding the ACTH receptor MC2R, was identified in a single patient with PMAH and resulted in constitutive receptor activation in vitro.32 Two additional MC2R mutations (p.C21R and p.S247G) found in a patient with hypersensitivity to ACTH, had the same effect.33 MC2R mutations appear to be a very rare cause of CS, if at all contributory.

Genetic alterations common to Cushing’s syndrome of adrenal and pituitary origin

Mosaic or somatic GNAS mutations

Early postzygotic mutations in GNAS (on chromosome 20q13.32) affecting the amino acid 201 of the best-known product of GNAS, the G stimulatory protein subunit alpha, cause the McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS).34 MAS consists of monostotic or polyostotic fibrous dysplasia presenting together with one or more manifestations of endocrine hyperfunction (most frequently, primary precocious puberty) and/or dermal café-au-lait spots. Such mutations cause loss of the GTPase function of the protein, resulting in constitutively active GNAS (gsp oncogene).35 Cushing’s syndrome is an infrequent component of MAS (4% of patients), occurring most often in patients with multiple other manifestations of the syndrome.34, 36 Hypercortisolism in this setting is due to bilateral primary bimorphic (diffuse/nodular hyperplasia and cortical atrophy with apparent zona glomerulosa hyperplasia) adrenocortical disease.37 Besides MAS, somatic mutations in GNAS codons 201 or 227 (which have the same functional effects) can also be found as somatic changes in 4–15% of CPAs.1113 The same mutations are a common finding in sporadic pituitary adenomas, (mainly somatotropinomas), although they are rarely found in corticotrotropinomas, with only three cases reported so far.38, 39

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

The syndrome of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by the development of tumors in multiple endocrine and non-endocrine organs.40 Primary hyperparathyroidism (the most constant feature of the syndrome), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and pituitary adenomas are the three main components or MEN1.41 Eighty five percent of the MEN1 patients have familial presentation and penetrance is age and organ-specific, and almost complete by the fifth decade of life.42 Ninety percent of the MEN1 cases bear loss-of-function germline mutations or deletions in the MEN1 gene (on chromosome 11q13.1), encoding the tumor suppressor menin, a scaffolding protein that regulates the expression and function of proteins involved in transcriptional regulation, genome stability and cell proliferation.4346 In mice, Men1 full knockout is lethal in utero, but hypomorphic models develop a syndrome resembling the human phenotype.41

CS in the setting of MEN1 can be due to a corticotropinoma (79%), primary adrenal disease (21%) or very, rarely, ACTH secretion from a GEP-NET (a few case reports).47 Approximately 30–40% of MEN1 patients develop pituitary adenomas, and these tumors are the first disease manifestation in 17–29% of patients, usually arising at a young age.4850 Pituitary adenomas in MEN1 patients are significantly larger and more invasive than those occurring in non-MEN1 sporadic patients (76–85% are macroadenomas), but there is no increased prevalence of carcinomas.48, 51 Two-thirds of the patients with clinically evident pituitary disease have prolactinomas, while corticotropinomas represent only 3–10% of the MEN1-related pituitary adenomas.48, 5052 Around 10% of MEN1 patients develop adrenal tumors (most of them nonfunctioning), but the incidence of adrenal enlargement is much higher; the prevalence of adrenal cancer is 1%. Nevertheless, CS is relatively infrequent (5% of MEN1 patients with adrenal tumors).53

Carney complex

Carney complex (CNC) is a rare syndrome composed of multiple endocrine neoplasia and cardiocutaneous manifestations, with autosomal dominant inheritance.54, 55 Three-quarters of CNC cases are caused by loss-of-function mutations in the PRKAR1A gene (on chromosome 17q24.2), 6% are due to deletions in 17q24.2-q24.3, and a triplication of the PRKACB gene was identified as the cause of disease in a single patient, while other cases are linked to an uncharacterized defect in 2p16.5659 More than half of the cases display familial presentation, with almost full penetrance.60 No germline or somatic PRKAR1A mutations have been identified in sporadic pituitary adenomas.6163 PRKAR1A loss-of-function causes unopposed activation of the cAMP/PKA pathway due to uncontrolled catalytic subunit activity.55, 64 One-quarter of CNC patients develop CS due to PPNAD, although histological evidence of PPNAD has been detected in almost all CNC individuals at autopsy.65 Patients develop hypercortisolism with insidious progression over the years, that characteristically displays a paradoxical rise during the six-day Liddle test.66 Histologically, PPNAD consists of normal-sized or slightly enlarged adrenals with irregular contour, due to small subcapsular dark nodules and cortical atrophy.67 So far, only three cases of CD have been reported among CNC patients, all of them with frameshift PRKAR1A mutations, although the corticotropinoma was highly suspected but not fully proven in one of the patients.68, 69 Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the corticotropinoma tissue was demonstrated in two cases.69, 70 In the setting of CNC, CD represents a diagnostic challenge in CNC, due to the possible coexistence of CS of adrenal origin.57, 68

Genetic alterations in Cushing’s disease

Somatic gain-of-function USP8 mutations

Mutations in the exon 14 of the USP8 gene (15q21.2), encoding the ubiquitin-specific protease 8, have been reported in 31–60% of corticotropinomas occurring in children and adults in tumor-extracted DNA, accounting for the most common somatic gene alteration in CD.7174 Such gene defects affect highly conserved residues localized in a hotspot within the 14-3-3 binding motif (residues 715–720). Under physiological conditions, USP8 binds and deubiquitinates target ubiquitinated proteins to prevent their proteasomal degradation. Cleavage of USP8 at a site immediately upstream to the 14-3-3 binding motif by still unknown proteases results in enhanced deubiquitinase activity from a C-terminal 40-kDa protein fragment.72 Phosphorylation and binding to 14-3-3 proteins regulates USP8 function by preventing cleavage, but loss of such interaction results in unrestricted protein function. A key target protein for USP8 in corticotroph cells is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and USP8 gain-of-function mutations are translated into continuous EGFR recycling, and therefore increased EGFR signaling, resulting in increased POMC transcription.72, 73, 75 Along these lines, corticotropinomas carrying USP8 mutations are usually microadenomas that strongly express POMC.76

Although EGFR overexpression is not a consistent finding in USP8 mutation positive tumors, in vitro studies have proven that USP8 mutants inhibit the degradation of the ligand-bound EGFR in EGF-stimulated cells.72, 76 Expression of the somatostatin receptor type 5 (SSTR5) and O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) are increased in USP8-mutated tumors, suggesting that such tumors might be responsive to the pharmacological treatment with pasireotide, but not with temozolomide.76 The frequency of USP8 mutations is higher in females in all the cohorts reported so far, but there are discrepancies among studies regarding other clinical and biochemical features.7173, 76 Interestingly, the frequency of USP8 mutations in a recently reported cohort of patients with Nelson’s syndrome (45%), was not higher than what has been reported for CD, although such mutations were associated with lower frequency of ACTH normalization after surgery.77

Somatic RASD1 mutation

Originally identified as a gene induced by dexamethasone treatment of AtT20 cells, RASD1 encodes a glucocorticoid-inducible Ras guanosine triphophatase (RAS GTPase) that might have a physiological role in the glucocorticoid negative feedback in corticotrophs, where it inhibits cAMP-stimulated secretion.78, 79 By interacting with G inhibitory proteins, RASD1 exerts a context-dependent activation or suppression of MAPK signaling.80, 81 RASD1 is also expressed in other tissues, where it might mediate local responses to glucocorticoids; it displays a circadian rhythm of expression in the hypothalamus and has a role as a mediator of the photic response of the circadian clock.78, 82 A novel missense mutation in the RASD1 gene was detected in a small allelic fraction by whole exome sequencing in corticotropinoma tissue from a young adult CD female; a coexistent hotspot USP8 mutation was identified in the same tumor.83 It was hypothesized that, in this genetically heterogeneous tumor, the RASD1 mutation could contribute to cell proliferation and ACTH secretion in a small subpopulation of cells.

Somatic TP53 mutations

Only three CD cases have so far been associated with somatic inactivating missense TP53 mutations, including two patients with ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinomas (one heterozygous and one not specified) and one patient with an invasive corticotropinoma with high Ki-67 index and a homozygous mutation.84, 85 Immunostaining for TP53 was positive in the three cases, and particularly high for carcinomas (60 and 90% of positive cells). Interestingly, accumulation of TP53 protein has been observed in 50% of corticotropinomas, suggesting that alternative mechanisms should have a role in the overexpression of this tumor suppressor.86

Somatic and germline N3CR1 mutations

Mutations in the N3CR1 gene, encoding the glucocorticoid receptor, have been identified by direct sequencing in two cases of CD: a patient with a frameshift somatic mutation and Nelson’s syndrome and a case of CD with generalized glucocorticoid resistance and a dominant-negative de novo germline mutation.87, 88 Whole-exome sequencing of 12 corticotropinomas demonstrated an additional case with a somatic nonsense mutation.73 Loss of function of N3CR1 in the corticotroph cells impairs the response to the negative adrenal feedback, rendering the cells resistant to the antiproliferative and antisecretory effects of glucocorticoids. Other studies failed to identify further mutations, indicating that N3CR1 gene defects are a rare cause of CD.89, 90

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2

Activating mutations in the rearranged during transfection protooncogene (RET, 10q.11.2) are associated with the syndrome of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, an autosomal dominant entity that includes three distinctive clinical presentations: familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), MEN2A (association of MTC, pheochromocytomas, hyperparathyroidism), and MEN2B (MTC, pheochromocytomas, characteristic facies, marfanoid habitus, ocular abnormalities, musculoskeletal manifestations and generalized ganglioneuromatosis).91 RET encodes the tyrosine kinase membrane receptor for the glial-derived neurotrophic factor, expressed by the neural crest during embryogenesis. Activating mutations result in constitutive RET function and activation of pro-proliferative molecular pathways, including the RAS/RAF proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT) pathway.91, 92 Pituitary adenomas are not a classical component of MEN2, but an association between pituitary adenomas and RET mutations has been reported in four different patients. Three patients presented with an MEN2A-like phenotype; the fourth patient presented as MEN2B; among them, two CD cases have been associated with RET mutations.9396 Other patients with similar phenotypes have been described in the literature, although genetic testing was not available or was negative for RET mutations.97 Although rarely, MEN4 patients can also develop CS due to ectopic ACTH secretion from MTC.91

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4

Human germline mutations in the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1B gene (CDKN1B, 12p13.1) cause about 2% of the cases of MEN1 mutation-negative multiple endocrine neoplasia.98100 These patients display a heterogeneous phenotype, referred to as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), encompassing parathyroid and pituitary adenomas, neuroendocrine tumors and various benign and malignant neoplasms.98 MEN4 is an autosomal dominant disorder with incomplete penetrance, therefore it can present clinically as familial or sporadic cases.101 The most common component of the syndrome is hyperparathyroidism, while renal angiomyolipoma, adrenal non-functional tumor, uterine fibroids, gastrinoma and gastric carcinoma, GEP-NETs, non-functioning pancreatic endocrine neoplasm, neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, bronchial carcinoid and papillary thyroid carcinoma have also been described as part of the syndrome.98100, 102107

Pituitary tumors have been reported in eight MEN4 patients so far, only one of them with CD.100, 101, 107 This female patient carrried a frameshift CDKN1B mutation (p.K25fs) and was diagnosed with CD at the age of 46 years; loss of the normal allele was demonstrated in the tumor tissue. She also developed a small-cell neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma and hyperparathyroidism. Although the association of CDKN1B mutations with human corticotropinomas is rare, CDKN1B plays a crucial role in the control of corticotroph proliferation. In addition, Cdkn1b knockout mice develop, among other phenotypic abnormalities, ACTH-secreting hyperplasia or adenomas of the pituitary pars intermedia with full penetrance.108110 Given that CDKN1B gene defects are infrequent, other gene regulatory mechanisms might play a role in the impaired CDKN1B function often observed in corticotropinomas.

Three P association (3PAS)

The association of a pituitary adenoma with a pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma (pheo/PGL) in a single patient, recently defined as the “Three P Association” (3PAs), is a very infrequent phenotype, with only 82 cases identified in the literature.97, 111121 Out of the cases with a known genetic cause, twenty one are due to germline loss-of-function mutations in genes that are known to be causative of pheo/PGL: SDHB, SDHD, SDHC and SDHA genes (SDHx genes), in nine, six, two, two and one cases, respectively, while an SDHAF2 and a MAX mutation were reported in one case each.111115, 117, 120, 122126 A few other cases presenting with this phenotype represent variants of classic syndromes of multiple endocrine neoplasia: three cases with RET mutations (MEN2A), two cases with MEN1 mutations (MEN1) and one with a VHL mutation (Von Hippel-Lindau disease).93, 95, 119, 127 Four cases of Cushing’s disease presenting with 3PAs phenotype have been reported in the literature, one of them carrying a RET mutation (see “Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2”). Genetic screening failed to identify causative mutations in two patients.117, 118 One patient was not genetically tested but had a family history compatible with MEN2A.128 Although it is feasible that mutations in other pheo/PGL-related genes could lead to CD, this has not been demonstrated so far.

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma

Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) is defined by the presence of pituitary adenomas in two or more members of the same family in the absence of other clinical features, with autosomal dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance, and accounts for about 2.5% of all pituitary adenomas.129, 130 One-fifth of the FIPA cases are due to germline loss-of-function mutations in the AIP gene (11q13.2).131, 132 AIP mutations are also detected in a subset of sporadic pituitary adenomas affecting young patients, and in one-third of cases of gigantism.133, 134 In the somatotroph cells, AIP has a complex effect as a negative regulator of the cAMP/PKA pathway and of the downstream effects of a Gi protein-coupled receptor, probably an SSTR.135, 136 Ninety-three percent of the AIP mutation positive patients have macroadenomas and the clinical phenotype is growth hormone excess in 80% of the cases.132, 133 Only three cases of CD associated with AIP mutations have been described so far in one pediatric and two young adult patients with missense mutations (p.K103R in the pediatric case and p.R304Q in the adults), all of them with apparently sporadic presentation.137, 138 Nevertheless, the variants found in these patients have displayed inconsistent experimental results, therefore their pathogenic potential is uncertain (reviewed in 139).

FIPA with undetermined genetic cause represents a heterogeneous group of patients regarding pituitary tumor types, although half of these patients develop GH excess.140 Six percent of these patients have CD, and FIPA families with exclusively cases CD have only been reported in the absence of AIP mutations.133, 141 X-linked acrogigantism, an infrequent form of gigantism with very young onset caused by GPR101 (Xq26.3) gene amplification, occasionally has a familial presentation and is included by some, but not all authors as part of FIPA. Nevertheless, GPR101 gene defects have not been implicated in CD as yet.142

CD associated with CABLES1 mutations

The negative cell cycle regulator CABLES1 is a direct target gene for glucocorticoids in the corticotroph cells, therefore acting as a mediator of the regulatory adrenal-pituitary feedback loop.143 CABLES1 stabilizes and prevents the degradation of cell cycle regulators and interacts with TP53 and TP73 to trigger apoptosis; such tumor suppressor activity is inhibited by 14-3-3 or AKT-mediated phosphorylation 144, 145 CABLES1 expression is lost in a variety of human cancers, and CABLES1 gene inactivation promotes cell proliferation and survival, as well as tumor formation in vitro, and replicates the human neoplasms in mouse models.144 We have recently identified four CD patients with loss-of-function CABLES1 missense mutations, accounting for 2% of the patients tested.146 The four patients had young-onset macroadenomas that were large and aggressive. The mutations were demonstrated at the germline level in two of the patients, while only tumor-derived DNA was available in the other two cases; one of the germline mutations was demonstrated in an apparently unaffected parent. These mutations displayed reduced ability to block corticotroph cell proliferation in response to dexamethasone stimulation in vitro. None of the patients had somatic USP8 mutations, and immunohistochemistry revealed variable CABLES1 with very low nuclear CDKN1B staining. Given its function, CABLES1 could provide a link between two of the main molecular mechanisms disrupted in corticotropinomas: dysfunction of the CDK/cyclin-dependent cell cycle regulation and EGFR activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) pathway, which uses AKT1 as one of its main effectors.145, 147, 148

DICER1 syndrome

The DICER1 syndrome or pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) familial tumor and dysplasia syndrome consists of the association of PPB, ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors, cystic nephroma and thyroid gland tumors such as multinodular goiter, adenomas, and differentiated thyroid cancer together with other less common benign and malignant tumors.149, 150 This syndrome is caused by loss-of-function mutations in the DICER1 gene (14q32.13), and has autosomal dominant presentation, with very low penetrance. Eighty percent of the mutations are inherited and 20% present de novo and only one-third of the mutation carriers have a known familial history of DICER1-related tumours.150 DICER1 is a multidomain enzyme with important functions in micro RNA (miRNA) processing; the RNaseIIIa and RNaseIIIb domains, located at the C-terminal half, constitute the catalytic core of the enzyme. Somatic DICER1 loss-of-function variants have been reported in DICER1-related tumors, most of them affecting the RNase IIIb catalytic domain, in the presence or absence of germline mutations.151

Pituitary blastoma is a very rare and aggressive apparently congenital pituitary tumor presenting clinically as CD early in infancy.152 A recent study reported thirteen cases of DICER1 syndrome with pituitary blastoma, and nine out of ten infants tested were positive for heterozygous DICER1 mutations. Somatic DICER1 mutations were detected in seven cases, and two cases displayed LOH in the tumor, accounting for a total of nine patients with somatic alterations; seven of these cases were also positive for germline mutations.152 This series, together with a recent case report, account for a total of 14 genetically screened cases of this neoplasm reported to date.153 The first manifestation of disease appeared early in childhood, and in most cases (9/14) pituitary blastoma was the only manifestation of the syndrome; five out of the patients died within 0–26 months of the first surgery.152, 153 At the histopathological examination, pituitary blastomas resemble the human fetal adenohypophysis at the age of 10–12 gestational weeks, when corticotrophs and somatotrophs are already differentiated, and alpha-glycoprotein subunit starts to emerge, but other cells types are not yet evident.154 Aside of pituitary blastoma, it remains uncertain whether DICER1 could also play a role in CD due to pituitary adenomas.

Tuberous sclerosis complex

Tuberous sclerosis complex is a syndrome characterized by multiple hamartomatous lesions affecting brain, skin, heart, lungs and kidneys, associated with neurological manifestations such as seizures, autism and cognitive disability. This syndrome is due to loss-of-function mutations in either the TSC1 (9q34.13) or the TSC2 (16p13.3) gene, whose protein products (hamartin and tuberin) act as negative regulators of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex1 (mTORC1), therefore inhibiting cell growth.155 Pituitary adenomas are not a common feature of the tuberous sclerosis complex, but CD has been described in two of such patients so far: a pediatric patient with a TSC2 mutation and a young adult who was not genetically tested; both patients presented with other coexistent manifestations of TSC.63, 156, 157

X-linked congenital adrenal hypoplasia

The clinical association of adrenal hypoplasia with glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid deficiency and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism is due to loss of function mutations in the DAX1 gene (Xp21.2), encoding an orphan nuclear receptor.158 A single case of a corticotropinoma associated with a germline frameshift DAX1 mutation has been described.159 The patient had preexisting adrenal insufficiency, primary hypothyroidism and hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism and was diagnosed with a CD at the age of 33 years, due to an invasive corticotropinoma. Maternal inheritance of the genetic defect was proven, but no other affected family members were identified.

Summary

Great progress has been done in the recent years to elucidate the genetic defects underlying CS of adrenal and pituitary origin. Frequent molecular abnormalities in adrenal lesions include cAMP/PKA and WNT/CTNN1B signaling overactivation, while glucocorticoid resistance, abnormal expression of cell cycle regulators and overexpression of membrane receptors predominate in corticotropinomas. Although most of the patients present sporadically, CS is part of a growing number of syndromes of familial isolated CS or multiple endocrine and non-endocrine neoplasia. Moreover, it should be kept in mind that CS of adrenal and pituitary origin can coexist in the setting of some syndromic presentations, complicating the diagnosis. Further research efforts are required to unveil other molecular abnormalities in CS, which will hopefully lead to novel therapeutic targets.

Key Points.

  • Cushing’s syndrome (CS) of pituitary or adrenal origin usually presents as a sporadic entity and is most commonly due to somatic gene defects.

  • Cortisol-producing adenomas are the most common cause of adrenal CS and these lesions are frequently caused by somatic activating mutations in the PRKACA gene.

  • Somatic gain-of-function mutations in the USP8 gene constitute the most common genetic defect in corticotropinomas.

  • Although infrequent, familial forms of CS may present either isolated or in association with various familial syndromes of multiple endocrine and non-endocrine neoplasia.

  • Understanding the genetic defects that drive corticotroph and adrenocortical tumorigenesis should lead to unraveling novel therapeutic targets, which will hopefully be translated into more efficient strategies for the medical treatment of patients with CS.

Footnotes

Disclosure: The authors have nothing to disclose.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, et al. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):913–927. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61375-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Berthon A, Stratakis CA. From beta-catenin to ARM-repeat proteins in adrenocortical disorders. Horm Metab Res. 2014;46(12):889–896. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1389993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gaujoux S, Tissier F, Groussin L, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin and 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate/protein kinase A signaling pathways alterations and somatic beta-catenin gene mutations in the progression of adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(10):4135–4140. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tadjine M, Lampron A, Ouadi L, et al. Frequent mutations of beta-catenin gene in sporadic secreting adrenocortical adenomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;68(2):264–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03033.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burnichon N, Briere JJ, Libe R, et al. SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(15):3011–3020. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bonnet S, Gaujoux S, Launay P, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin pathway activation in adrenocortical adenomas is frequently due to somatic CTNNB1-activating mutations, which are associated with larger and nonsecreting tumors: a study in cortisol-secreting and -nonsecreting tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):E419–426. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tissier F, Cavard C, Groussin L, et al. Mutations of beta-catenin in adrenocortical tumors: activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a frequent event in both benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors. Cancer Res. 2005;65(17):7622–7627. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hsiao HP, Kirschner LS, Bourdeau I, et al. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity, overlap with other tumor syndromes, and atypical glucocorticoid hormone secretion in adrenocorticotropin-independent macronodular adrenal hyperplasia compared with other adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(8):2930–2937. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gaujoux S, Pinson S, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, et al. Inactivation of the APC gene is constant in adrenocortical tumors from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis but not frequent in sporadic adrenocortical cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(21):5133–5141. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Beuschlein F, Fassnacht M, Assie G, et al. Constitutive activation of PKA catalytic subunit in adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):1019–1028. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cao Y, He M, Gao Z, et al. Activating hotspot L205R mutation in PRKACA and adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. Science. 2014;344(6186):913–917. doi: 10.1126/science.1249480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sato Y, Maekawa S, Ishii R, et al. Recurrent somatic mutations underlie corticotropin-independent Cushing’s syndrome. Science. 2014;344(6186):917–920. doi: 10.1126/science.1252328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goh G, Scholl UI, Healy JM, et al. Recurrent activating mutation in PRKACA in cortisol-producing adrenal tumors. Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):613–617. doi: 10.1038/ng.2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lodish MB, Yuan B, Levy I, et al. Germline PRKACA amplification causes variable phenotypes that may depend on the extent of the genomic defect: molecular mechanisms and clinical presentations. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;172(6):803–811. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Horvath A, Boikos S, Giatzakis C, et al. A genome-wide scan identifies mutations in the gene encoding phosphodiesterase 11A4 (PDE11A) in individuals with adrenocortical hyperplasia. Nat Genet. 2006;38(7):794–800. doi: 10.1038/ng1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Horvath A, Mericq V, Stratakis CA. Mutation in PDE8B, a cyclic AMP-specific phosphodiesterase in adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):750–752. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0706182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Horvath A, Giatzakis C, Tsang K, et al. A cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase (PDE8B) that is mutated in adrenal hyperplasia is expressed widely in human and mouse tissues: a novel PDE8B isoform in human adrenal cortex. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(10):1245–1253. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2008.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Assie G, Libe R, Espiard S, et al. ARMC5 mutations in macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with Cushing’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2105–2114. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Faucz FR, Zilbermint M, Lodish MB, et al. Macronodular adrenal hyperplasia due to mutations in an armadillo repeat containing 5 (ARMC5) gene: a clinical and genetic investigation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6):E1113–1119. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Espiard S, Drougat L, Libe R, et al. ARMC5 Mutations in a Large Cohort of Primary Macronodular Adrenal Hyperplasia: Clinical and Functional Consequences. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(6):E926–935. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Correa R, Zilbermint M, Berthon A, et al. The ARMC5 gene shows extensive genetic variance in primary macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):435–440. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cavalcante IP, Nishi M, Zerbini MCN, et al. The role of ARMC5 in human cell cultures from nodules of primary macronodular adrenocortical hyperplasia (PMAH) Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;460:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Berthon A, Faucz FR, Espiard S, et al. Age-dependent effects of Armc5 haploinsufficiency on adrenocortical function. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(18):3495–3507. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gagliardi L, Schreiber AW, Hahn CN, et al. ARMC5 mutations are common in familial bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(9):E1784–1792. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alencar GA, Lerario AM, Nishi MY, et al. ARMC5 mutations are a frequent cause of primary macronodular adrenal Hyperplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(8):E1501–1509. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Xekouki P, Stratakis CA. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDHx) mutations in pituitary tumors: could this be a new role for mitochondrial complex II and/or Krebs cycle defects? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19(6):C33–C40. doi: 10.1530/ERC-12-0118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fragoso MC, Alencar GA, Lerario AM, et al. Genetics of primary macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. J Endocrinol. 2015;224(1):R31–43. doi: 10.1530/JOE-14-0568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matyakhina L, Freedman RJ, Bourdeau I, et al. Hereditary leiomyomatosis associated with bilateral, massive, macronodular adrenocortical disease and atypical cushing syndrome: a clinical and molecular genetic investigation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(6):3773–3779. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-2377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shuch B, Ricketts CJ, Vocke CD, et al. Adrenal nodular hyperplasia in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer. J Urol. 2013;189(2):430–435. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Louiset E, Duparc C, Young J, et al. Intraadrenal corticotropin in bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(22):2115–2125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lecoq AL, Stratakis CA, Viengchareun S, et al. Adrenal GIPR expression and chromosome 19q13 microduplications in GIP-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. JCI Insight. 2017;2(18) doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.92184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Swords FM, Baig A, Malchoff DM, et al. Impaired desensitization of a mutant adrenocorticotropin receptor associated with apparent constitutive activity. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16(12):2746–2753. doi: 10.1210/me.2002-0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Swords FM, Noon LA, King PJ, et al. Constitutive activation of the human ACTH receptor resulting from a synergistic interaction between two naturally occurring missense mutations in the MC2R gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004;213(2):149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2003.10.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Collins MT, Singer FR, Eugster E. McCune-Albright syndrome and the extraskeletal manifestations of fibrous dysplasia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012;7(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-7-S1-S4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Landis CA, Masters SB, Spada A, et al. GTPase inhibiting mutations activate the alpha chain of Gs and stimulate adenylyl cyclase in human pituitary tumours. Nature. 1989;340(6236):692–696. doi: 10.1038/340692a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brown RJ, Kelly MH, Collins MT. Cushing syndrome in the McCune-Albright syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(4):1508–1515. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Carney JA, Young WF, Stratakis CA. Primary bimorphic adrenocortical disease: cause of hypercortisolism in McCune-Albright syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(9):1311–1326. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821ec4ce. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williamson EA, Ince PG, Harrison D, et al. G-protein mutations in human pituitary adrenocorticotrophic hormone-secreting adenomas. Eur J Clin Invest. 1995;25(2):128–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1995.tb01537.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Riminucci M, Collins MT, Lala R, et al. An R201H activating mutation of the GNAS1 (Gsalpha) gene in a corticotroph pituitary adenoma. Mol Pathol. 2002;55(1):58–60. doi: 10.1136/mp.55.1.58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Wermer P. Genetic aspects of adenomatosis of endocrine glands. Am J Med. 1954;16(3):363–371. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(54)90353-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Thakker RV. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4) Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2014;386(1–2):2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(9):2990–3011. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lemmens I, Van de Ven WJ, Kas K, et al. Identification of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) gene. The European Consortium on MEN1. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(7):1177–1183. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.7.1177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, et al. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science. 1997;276(5311):404–407. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5311.404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lemos MC, Thakker RV. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): analysis of 1336 mutations reported in the first decade following identification of the gene. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(1):22–32. doi: 10.1002/humu.20605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Concolino P, Costella A, Capoluongo E. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): An update of 208 new germline variants reported in the last nine years. Cancer Genet. 2016;209(1–2):36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Simonds WF, Varghese S, Marx SJ, et al. Cushing’s syndrome in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;76(3):379–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04220.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Verges B, Boureille F, Goudet P, et al. Pituitary disease in MEN type 1 (MEN1): data from the France-Belgium MEN1 multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):457–465. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Farrell WE, Azevedo MF, Batista DL, et al. Unique gene expression profile associated with an early-onset multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1)-associated pituitary adenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(11):E1905–1914. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.de Laat JM, Dekkers OM, Pieterman CR, et al. Long-Term Natural Course of Pituitary Tumors in Patients With MEN1: Results From the DutchMEN1 Study Group (DMSG) J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):3288–3296. doi: 10.1210/JC.2015-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trouillas J, Labat-Moleur F, Sturm N, et al. Pituitary tumors and hyperplasia in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1): a case-control study in a series of 77 patients versus 2509 non-MEN1 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(4):534–543. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815ade45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Benito M, Asa SL, Livolsi VA, et al. Gonadotroph tumor associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(1):570–574. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gatta-Cherifi B, Chabre O, Murat A, et al. Adrenal involvement in MEN1. Analysis of 715 cases from the Groupe d’etude des Tumeurs Endocrines database. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(2):269–279. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Carney JA, Gordon H, Carpenter PC, et al. The complex of myxomas, spotty pigmentation, and endocrine overactivity. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64(4):270–283. doi: 10.1097/00005792-198507000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Correa R, Salpea P, Stratakis CA. Carney complex: an update. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173(4):M85–97. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Stratakis CA, Carney JA, Lin JP, et al. Carney complex, a familial multiple neoplasia and lentiginosis syndrome. Analysis of 11 kindreds and linkage to the short arm of chromosome 2. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(3):699–705. doi: 10.1172/JCI118467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Pack SD, et al. Mutations of the gene encoding the protein kinase A type I-alpha regulatory subunit in patients with the Carney complex. Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):89–92. doi: 10.1038/79238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Forlino A, Vetro A, Garavelli L, et al. PRKACB and Carney complex. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):1065–1067. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1309730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Salpea P, Horvath A, London E, et al. Deletions of the PRKAR1A Locus at 17q24.2-q24. 3 in Carney Complex: Genotype-Phenotype Correlations and Implications for Genetic Testing. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2014;99(1):E183–E188. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Horvath A, Bertherat J, Groussin L, et al. Mutations and polymorphisms in the gene encoding regulatory subunit type 1-alpha of protein kinase A (PRKAR1A): an update. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(4):369–379. doi: 10.1002/humu.21178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kaltsas GA, Kola B, Borboli N, et al. Sequence analysis of the PRKAR1A gene in sporadic somatotroph and other pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002;57(4):443–448. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01643.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Sandrini F, Kirschner LS, Bei T, et al. PRKAR1A, one of the Carney complex genes, and its locus (17q22–24) are rarely altered in pituitary tumours outside the Carney complex. J Med Genet. 2002;39(12):e78. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.12.e78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Stratakis CA, Tichomirowa MA, Boikos S, et al. The role of germline AIP, MEN1, PRKAR1A, CDKN1B and CDKN2C mutations in causing pituitary adenomas in a large cohort of children, adolescents, and patients with genetic syndromes. Clin Genet. 2010;78(5):457–463. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01406.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Meoli E, Bossis I, Cazabat L, et al. Protein kinase A effects of an expressed PRKAR1A mutation associated with aggressive tumors. Cancer Res. 2008;68(9):3133–3141. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stratakis CA, Kirschner LS, Carney JA. Clinical and molecular features of the Carney complex: diagnostic criteria and recommendations for patient evaluation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86(9):4041–4046. doi: 10.1210/jcem.86.9.7903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Stratakis CA, Sarlis N, Kirschner LS, et al. Paradoxical response to dexamethasone in the diagnosis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;131(8):585–591. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-8-199910190-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stratakis CA, Kirschner LS. Clinical and genetic analysis of primary bilateral adrenal diseases (micro- and macronodular disease) leading to Cushing syndrome. Horm Metab Res. 1998;30(6–7):456–463. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-978914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Basson CT, Aretz HT. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 11–2002. A 27-year-old woman with two intracardiac masses and a history of endocrinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1152–1158. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcpc010057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Hernández-Ramírez LC, Tatsi C, Lodish MB, et al. Corticotropinoma in the setting of Carney complex. Endocrine Society ENDO. 2017;2017:MON-489. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kiefer FW, Winhofer Y, Iacovazzo D, et al. PRKAR1A mutation causing pituitary-dependent Cushing disease in a patient with Carney complex. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(2):K7–K12. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pérez-Rivas LG, Theodoropoulou M, Ferrau F, et al. The gene of the ubiquitin-specific protease 8 is frequently mutated in adenomas causing Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(7):E997–1004. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Reincke M, Sbiera S, Hayakawa A, et al. Mutations in the deubiquitinase gene USP8 cause Cushing’s disease. Nat Genet. 2015;47(1):31–38. doi: 10.1038/ng.3166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ma ZY, Song ZJ, Chen JH, et al. Recurrent gain-of-function USP8 mutations in Cushing’s disease. Cell Res. 2015;25(3):306–317. doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Faucz FR, Tirosh A, Tatsi C, et al. Somatic USP8 gene mutations are a common cause of pediatric Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(8):2836–2843. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mizuno E, Iura T, Mukai A, et al. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor down-regulation by UBPY-mediated deubiquitination at endosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(11):5163–5174. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hayashi K, Inoshita N, Kawaguchi K, et al. The USP8 mutational status may predict drug susceptibility in corticotroph adenomas of Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;174(2):213–226. doi: 10.1530/EJE-15-0689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pérez-Rivas LG, Theodoropoulou M, Puar TH, et al. Somatic USP8 mutations are frequent events in corticotroph tumor progression causing Nelson’s tumor. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018;178(1):59–65. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kemppainen RJ, Behrend EN. Dexamethasone rapidly induces a novel ras superfamily member-related gene in AtT-20 cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(6):3129–3131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Graham TE, Key TA, Kilpatrick K, et al. Dexras1/AGS-1, a steroid hormone-induced guanosine triphosphate-binding protein, inhibits 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate-stimulated secretion in AtT-20 corticotroph cells. Endocrinology. 2001;142(6):2631–2640. doi: 10.1210/endo.142.6.8209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Cismowski MJ, Takesono A, Ma C, et al. Genetic screens in yeast to identify mammalian nonreceptor modulators of G-protein signaling. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17(9):878–883. doi: 10.1038/12867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Graham TE, Prossnitz ER, Dorin RI. Dexras1/AGS-1 inhibits signal transduction from the Gi-coupled formyl peptide receptor to Erk-1/2 MAP kinases. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(13):10876–10882. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110397200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Cheng HY, Obrietan K, Cain SW, et al. Dexras1 potentiates photic and suppresses nonphotic responses of the circadian clock. Neuron. 2004;43(5):715–728. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Uzilov AV, Cheesman KC, Fink MY, et al. Identification of a novel RASD1 somatic mutation in a USP8-mutated corticotroph adenoma. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2017;3(3):a001602. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a001602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tanizaki Y, Jin L, Scheithauer BW, et al. P53 gene mutations in pituitary carcinomas. Endocr Pathol. 2007;18(4):217–222. doi: 10.1007/s12022-007-9006-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kawashima ST, Usui T, Sano T, et al. P53 gene mutation in an atypical corticotroph adenoma with Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;70(4):656–657. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03404.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Buckley N, Bates AS, Broome JC, et al. P53 protein accumulates in Cushings adenomas and invasive non-functional adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(2):4. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.2.7852482. p following 692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Karl M, Lamberts SW, Koper JW, et al. Cushing’s disease preceded by generalized glucocorticoid resistance: clinical consequences of a novel, dominant-negative glucocorticoid receptor mutation. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1996;108(4):296–307. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Karl M, Von Wichert G, Kempter E, et al. Nelson’s syndrome associated with a somatic frame shift mutation in the glucocorticoid receptor gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(1):124–129. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.1.8550738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Dahia PL, Honegger J, Reincke M, et al. Expression of glucocorticoid receptor gene isoforms in corticotropin-secreting tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(4):1088–1093. doi: 10.1210/jcem.82.4.3861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Antonini SR, Latronico AC, Elias LL, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor gene polymorphisms in ACTH-secreting pituitary tumours. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2002;57(5):657–662. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01639.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wells SA, Jr, Pacini F, Robinson BG, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma: an update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(8):3149–3164. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Machens A, Dralle H. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 and the RET protooncogene: from bedside to bench to bedside. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2006;247(1–2):34–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2005.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Saito T, Miura D, Taguchi M, et al. Coincidence of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A with acromegaly. Am J Med Sci. 2010;340(4):329–331. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181e73fba. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Heinlen JE, Buethe DD, Culkin DJ, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia 2a presenting with pheochromocytoma and pituitary macroadenoma. ISRN Oncol. 2011;2011:732452. doi: 10.5402/2011/732452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Naziat A, Karavitaki N, Thakker R, et al. Confusing genes: a patient with MEN2A and Cushing’s disease. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013;78(6):966–968. doi: 10.1111/cen.12072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Kasturi K, Fernandes L, Quezado M, et al. Cushing Disease in a patient with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 2B. J Clin Transl Endocrinol Case Rep. 2017;4:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jecr.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.O’Toole SM, Denes J, Robledo M, et al. 15 YEARS OF PARAGANGLIOMA: The association of pituitary adenomas and phaeochromocytomas or paragangliomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(4):T105–122. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pellegata NS, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Siggelkow H, et al. Germ-line mutations in p27Kip1 cause a multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome in rats and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(42):15558–15563. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603877103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Georgitsi M, Raitila A, Karhu A, et al. Germline CDKN1B/p27Kip1 mutation in multiple endocrine neoplasia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):3321–3325. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Agarwal SK, Mateo CM, Marx SJ. Rare germline mutations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor genes in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and related states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(5):1826–1834. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Lee M, Pellegata NS. Multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes associated with mutation of p27. J Endocrinol Invest. 2013;36(9):781–787. doi: 10.3275/9021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Molatore S, Marinoni I, Lee M, et al. A novel germline CDKN1B mutation causing multiple endocrine tumors: clinical, genetic and functional characterization. Hum Mutat. 2010;31(11):E1825–E1835. doi: 10.1002/humu.21354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Belar O, De la Hoz C, Perez-Nanclares G, et al. Novel mutations in MEN1, CDKN1B and AIP genes in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome in Spain. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2012;76(5):719–724. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04269.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Malanga D, De GS, Riccardi M, et al. Functional characterization of a rare germline mutation in the gene encoding the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 (CDKN1B) in a Spanish patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN)-like phenotype. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(3):551–560. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Occhi G, Regazzo D, Trivellin G, et al. A novel mutation in the upstream open reading frame of the CDKN1B gene causes a MEN4 phenotype. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(3):e1003350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Pardi E, Mariotti S, Pellegata NS, et al. Functional characterization of a CDKN1B mutation in a Sardinian kindred with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4) Endocr Connect. 2015;4(1):1–8. doi: 10.1530/EC-14-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Sambugaro S, Di RM, Ambrosio MR, et al. Early onset acromegaly associated with a novel deletion in CDKN1B 5′UTR region. Endocrine. 2015;49(1):58–64. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0540-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fero ML, Rivkin M, Tasch M, et al. A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis, and female sterility in p27(Kip1)-deficient mice. Cell. 1996;85(5):733–744. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81239-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Kiyokawa H, Kineman RD, Manova-Todorova KO, et al. Enhanced growth of mice lacking the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor function of p27(Kip1) Cell. 1996;85(5):721–732. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81238-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Nakayama K, Ishida N, Shirane M, et al. Mice lacking p27(Kip1) display increased body size, multiple organ hyperplasia, retinal dysplasia, and pituitary tumors. Cell. 1996;85(5):707–720. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81237-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Lopez-Jimenez E, de Campos JM, Kusak EM, et al. SDHC mutation in an elderly patient without familial antecedents. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2008;69(6):906–910. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Xekouki P, Pacak K, Almeida M, et al. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) D subunit (SDHD) inactivation in a growth-hormone-producing pituitary tumor: a new association for SDH? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(3):E357–366. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Varsavsky M, Sebastian-Ochoa A, Torres VE. Coexistence of a pituitary macroadenoma and multicentric paraganglioma: a strange coincidence. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60(3):154–156. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2012.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Dematti S, Branz G, Casagranda G, et al. Pituitary tumors in SDH mutation carriers. 12th ENSAT Meeting; 2013; p. 29. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dwight T, Mann K, Benn DE, et al. Familial SDHA mutation associated with pituitary adenoma and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(6):E1103–1108. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Niemeijer ND, Papathomas TG, Korpershoek E, et al. Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH)-Deficient Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Expands the SDH-Related Tumor Spectrum. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(10):E1386–1393. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-2689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Xekouki P, Szarek E, Bullova P, et al. Pituitary adenoma with paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma (3PAs) and succinate dehydrogenase defects in humans and mice. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;100(5):E710–E719. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Johnston PC, Kennedy L, Recinos PF, et al. Cushing’s disease and co-existing phaeochromocytoma. Pituitary. 2016;19(6):654–656. doi: 10.1007/s11102-015-0672-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Okada R, Shimura T, Tsukida S, et al. Concomitant existence of pheochromocytoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Surg Case Rep. 2016;2(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s40792-016-0214-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Guerrero Perez F, Lisbona Gil A, Robledo M, et al. Pituitary adenoma associated with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma: A new form of multiple endocrine neoplasia. Endocrinol Nutr. 2016;63(9):506–508. doi: 10.1016/j.endonu.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Niemeijer ND, Rijken JA, Eijkelenkamp K, et al. The phenotype of SDHB germline mutation carriers: a nationwide study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(2):115–125. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Benn DE, Richardson AL, Marsh DJ, et al. Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma- and paraganglioma-associated syndromes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1073:104–111. doi: 10.1196/annals.1353.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Majumdar S, Friedrich CA, Koch CA, et al. Compound heterozygous mutation with a novel splice donor region DNA sequence variant in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit B gene in malignant paraganglioma. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;54(3):473–475. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Papathomas TG, Gaal J, Corssmit EP, et al. Non-pheochromocytoma (PCC)/paraganglioma (PGL) tumors in patients with succinate dehydrogenase-related PCC-PGL syndromes: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170(1):1–12. doi: 10.1530/EJE-13-0623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Denes J, Swords F, Rattenberry E, et al. Heterogeneous genetic background of the association of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and pituitary adenoma: results from a large patient cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):E531–541. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Roszko KL, Blouch E, Blake M, et al. Case Report of a Prolactinoma in a Patient With a Novel MAX Mutation and Bilateral Pheochromocytomas. Journal of the Endocrine Society. 2017;1(11):1401–1407. doi: 10.1210/js.2017-00135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Denes J, Swords FM, Xekouki P, et al. Familial pituitary adenoma and paraganglioma syndrome - A novel type of multiple endocrine neoplasia. Endocr Rev. 2012;33:OR41–42. (04_MeetingAbstracts) [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Steiner AL, Goodman AD, Powers SR. Study of a kindred with pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, hyperparathyroidism and Cushing’s disease: multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2. Medicine (Baltimore) 1968;47(5):371–409. doi: 10.1097/00005792-196809000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Vierimaa O, Georgitsi M, Lehtonen R, et al. Pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by germline mutations in the AIP gene. Science. 2006;312(5777):1228–1230. doi: 10.1126/science.1126100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Daly AF, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Ciccarelli A, et al. Clinical characterization of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(9):3316–3323. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-2671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Hernandez-Ramirez LC, Gabrovska P, Denes J, et al. Landscape of Familial Isolated and Young-Onset Pituitary Adenomas: Prospective Diagnosis in AIP Mutation Carriers. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2015;100(9):E1242–E1254. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Daly AF, Tichomirowa MA, Petrossians P, et al. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses in patients with germ-line AIP mutations and pituitary adenomas: an international collaborative study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):E373–383. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Hernández-Ramírez LC, Gabrovska P, Dénes J, et al. Landscape of familial isolated and young-onset pituitary adenomas: prospective diagnosis in AIP mutation carriers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(9):E1242–1254. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-1869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rostomyan L, Daly AF, Petrossians P, et al. Clinical and genetic characterization of pituitary gigantism: an international collaborative study in 208 patients. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2015;22(5):745–757. doi: 10.1530/ERC-15-0320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Chahal HS, Trivellin G, Leontiou CA, et al. Somatostatin analogs modulate AIP in somatotroph adenomas: the role of the ZAC1 pathway. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(8):E1411–1420. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Tuominen I, Heliovaara E, Raitila A, et al. AIP inactivation leads to pituitary tumorigenesis through defective Galphai-cAMP signaling. Oncogene. 2015;34(9):1174–1184. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Georgitsi M, Raitila A, Karhu A, et al. Molecular diagnosis of pituitary adenoma predisposition caused by aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein gene mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(10):4101–4105. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700004104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Cazabat L, Bouligand J, Salenave S, et al. Germline AIP mutations in apparently sporadic pituitary adenomas: prevalence in a prospective single-center cohort of 443 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):E663–670. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hernández-Ramírez LC, Trivellin G, Stratakis CA. Role of phosphodiesterases on the function of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) in the pituitary gland and on the evaluation of AIP gene variants. Horm Metab Res. 2017;49(4):286–295. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-104700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Beckers A, Daly AF. The clinical, pathological, and genetic features of familial isolated pituitary adenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(4):371–382. doi: 10.1530/EJE-07-0348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Beckers A, Aaltonen LA, Daly AF, et al. Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) and the pituitary adenoma predisposition due to mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) gene. Endocrine Reviews. 2013;34(2):239–277. doi: 10.1210/er.2012-1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Trivellin G, Correa RR, Batsis M, et al. Screening for GPR101 defects in pediatric pituitary corticotropinomas. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2016;23(5):357–365. doi: 10.1530/ERC-16-0091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Roussel-Gervais A, Couture C, Langlais D, et al. The Cables1 gene in glucocorticoid regulation of pituitary corticotrope growth and Cushing disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):513–522. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Huang JR, Tan GM, Li Y, et al. The Emerging Role of Cables1 in Cancer and Other Diseases. Mol Pharmacol. 2017;92(3):240–245. doi: 10.1124/mol.116.107730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Shi Z, Park HR, Du Y, et al. Cables1 complex couples survival signaling to the cell death machinery. Cancer Res. 2015;75(1):147–158. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hernández-Ramírez LC, Gam R, Valdés N, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in the CABLES1 gene are a novel cause of Cushing’s disease. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2017;24(8):379–392. doi: 10.1530/ERC-17-0131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Fukuoka H, Cooper O, Ben-Shlomo A, et al. EGFR as a therapeutic target for human, canine, and mouse ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(12):4712–4721. doi: 10.1172/JCI60417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liu NA, Jiang H, Ben-Shlomo A, et al. Targeting zebrafish and murine pituitary corticotroph tumors with a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(20):8414–8419. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018091108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Slade I, Bacchelli C, Davies H, et al. DICER1 syndrome: clarifying the diagnosis, clinical features and management implications of a pleiotropic tumour predisposition syndrome. J Med Genet. 2011;48(4):273–278. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2010.083790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Doros L, Schultz KA, Stewart DR, et al. In: DICER1-Related Disorders. Pagon RA, Adam MP, Ardinger HH, et al., editors. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Seattle; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Foulkes WD, Priest JR, Duchaine TF. DICER1: mutations, microRNAs and mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(10):662–672. doi: 10.1038/nrc3802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.de Kock L, Sabbaghian N, Plourde F, et al. Pituitary blastoma: a pathognomonic feature of germ-line DICER1 mutations. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(1):111–122. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1285-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Sahakitrungruang T, Srichomthong C, Pornkunwilai S, et al. Germline and somatic DICER1 mutations in a pituitary blastoma causing infantile-onset Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(8):E1487–1492. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Horvath E, et al. Pituitary blastoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;116(6):657–666. doi: 10.1007/s00401-008-0388-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Lam HC, Nijmeh J, Henske EP. New developments in the genetics and pathogenesis of tumours in tuberous sclerosis complex. J Pathol. 2017;241(2):219–225. doi: 10.1002/path.4827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Tigas S, Carroll PV, Jones R, et al. Simultaneous Cushing’s disease and tuberous sclerosis; a potential role for TSC in pituitary ontogeny. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63(6):694–695. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Nandagopal R, Vortmeyer A, Oldfield EH, et al. Cushing’s syndrome due to a pituitary corticotropinoma in a child with tuberous sclerosis: an association or a coincidence? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007;67(4):639–641. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02941.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.McCabe ER. DAX1: Increasing complexity in the roles of this novel nuclear receptor. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007;265–266:179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2006.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.De Menis E, Roncaroli F, Calvari V, et al. Corticotroph adenoma of the pituitary in a patient with X-linked adrenal hypoplasia congenita due to a novel mutation of the DAX-1 gene. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153(2):211–215. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.01958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES