Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-018-26101-4, published online 23 May 2018
The authors did not cite a related paper and apologise for this oversight.
In the Introduction,
“Furthermore, it suggests that the nature of LGPS in conventional carbon-containing composite cathodes would vary with electrochemical cycling, which has not been considered in the evaluation of the cathode performance. In this respect, here we carefully study the effect of carbon additives in ASSBs based on LGPS electrolyte. It is found that the inclusion of carbon conductive agents regardless of their physical differences such as carbon nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes in composite cathode results in the inferior performance of the cathode in comparison to that without the carbon additives.”
should read:
“Furthermore, it suggests that the nature of LGPS in conventional carbon-containing composite cathodes would vary with electrochemical cycling, which has not been considered in the evaluation of the cathode performance. Very recently, such problem on the cathode interface in practical ASSB cell configuration has been reported by Zhang et al., who showed the adverse effect of carbon inclusion in ASSBs1. In this respect, here we carefully study the effect of carbon additives in ASSBs based on LGPS electrolyte. It is found that the inclusion of carbon conductive agents regardless of their physical differences such as carbon nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes in composite cathode results in the inferior performance of the cathode in comparison to that without the carbon additives.”
Footnotes
The original article can be found online at 10.1038/s41598-018-26101-4.
References
- 1.Zhang W, et al. The detrimental effects of carbon additives in Li10GeP2S12-based solid-state batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9(41):35888–35896. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b11530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]