Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2018 Jun 5;19(6):1665. doi: 10.3390/ijms19061665

Interleukin-34 Regulates Th1 and Th17 Cytokine Production by Activating Multiple Signaling Pathways through CSF-1R in Chicken Cell Lines

Anh Duc Truong 1,2, Yeojin Hong 1, Janggeun Lee 1, Kyungbaek Lee 1, Dong Yong Kil 1, Hyun S Lillehoj 3, Yeong Ho Hong 1,*
PMCID: PMC6032434  PMID: 29874806

Abstract

Interleukin-34 (IL-34) is a newly recognized cytokine with functions similar to macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1. It is expressed in macrophages and fibroblasts, where it induces cytokine production; however, the mechanism of chicken IL-34 (chIL-34) signaling has not been identified to date. The aim of this study was to analyze the signal transduction pathways and specific biological functions associated with chIL-34 in chicken macrophage (HD11) and fibroblast (OU2) cell lines. We found that IL-34 is a functional ligand for the colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R) in chicken cell lines. Treatment with chIL-34 increased the expression of Th1 and Th17 cytokines through phosphorylation of tyrosine and serine residues in Janus kinase (JAK) 2, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 1, STAT3, and Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2), which also led to phosphorylation of NF-κB1, p-mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (TAK1), MyD88, suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1), and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2). Taken together, these results suggest that chIL-34 functions by binding to CSF-1R and activating the JAK/STAT, nuclear factor κ B (NF-κB), and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways; these signaling events regulate cytokine expression and suggest roles for chIL-34 in innate and adaptive immunity.

Keywords: cytokines, chicken, interleukin-34, CSF-1R, signaling pathway

1. Introduction

In mammals, interleukin (IL)-34 is expressed in several cell types, such as macrophages, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, neurons, hepatocytes, regulatory T cells, and epithelial cells [1,2,3,4]; it is constitutively expressed in several adult tissues, such as the heart, brain, liver, spleen, thymus, testes, ovaries, prostate, and small intestine [5,6]. Previous reports demonstrated that, although IL-34 has no distinct sequence homology with macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), its biological activity is mediated by interaction with the homodimeric M-CSF receptor that is mainly expressed on the cell surface of macrophages [4,7]. Moreover, IL-34 also interacts with receptor-type protein-tyrosine phosphatase ζ, which is primarily expressed on neural progenitors and glial cells but not in fibroblasts [8,9,10]. On the other hand, the biological effects of CSF-1 or IL-34 are mediated by signaling through a single colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R), which can lead to distinct functional outcomes in mammals. M-CSF plays a key role in the development of cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, microglia, Langerhans cells, and regulators of bone homeostasis, including hemopoietic and hematopoietic stem cells; IL-34 has an essential role in the development of Langerhans cells, osteoclasts, and microglia, but not monocytes, macrophages, or dendritic cells [4,11,12]. To date, the function of IL-34 has been mainly described in monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, Langerhans cells, microglia, and fibroblasts in the contexts of human diseases, cell development, cell differentiation, or cell cycle [3,4,13,14]. Those studies indicated that IL-34 is involved in the maintenance and development of monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and Langerhans cells [15]. In addition, it has been reported as a genetic marker for several human diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis [16], obesity, chronic inflammation, insulin resistance [6], hepatitis C viral infection [17], influenza A viral infection [18], non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [19], and metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma [20,21]. In mammals, IL-34 induces and regulates IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, IL-23, CD14, and CD68 expression by activating the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT), PI3K/AKT, JNK1/2, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) signaling pathways [2,14,18]; it regulates pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in several cell types [1,2,3,4].

Chicken IL-34 (chIL-34) was first identified using a bioinformatics approach [22]. Comparative sequence and co-evolution analyses across all vertebrates suggested that chIL-34 and CSF-1 interact with distinct regions of the CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) [4,22] and share no overt sequence homology [13], which accounts for the differences in their functions. However, the mechanism of chIL-34 signaling has not been identified to date. In this study, we investigated the expression of IL-34 and its interaction with CSF-1R in chicken cell lines. We also explored how IL-34 is involved in the JAK/STAT, NF-κB, and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways to modulate cytokine production.

2. Results

2.1. Effects of chIL-34 on Cell Proliferation

In pilot experiments with a range of concentrations of recombinant chIL-34 (10, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 ng/mL), we demonstrated that recombinant chIL-34 (200 ng/mL) had a marked effect on the activation of certain kinases in chicken cell lines. To investigate the effects of recombinant chIL-34 on the proliferation of the macrophage (HD11) and fibroblast (OU2) cell lines, we treated the cells with chIL-34 (200 ng/mL), anti-CSF-1R antibody (10 µg/mL), or a combination of anti-CSF-1R antibody (10 µg/mL) and chIL-34 (200 ng/mL) for 72 h. The number of HD11 and OU2 cells was significantly increased after treatment with chIL-34 compared to the numbers of control, anti-CSF-1R-, or combination-treated cells (Figure S1C). These results indicated that chIL-34 enhanced the proliferation of HD11 and OU2 cells. In addition, we measured the nitric oxide (NO) production induced by chIL-34 (200 ng/mL), anti-CSF-1R antibody (10 µg/mL), or combination anti-CSF-1R antibody and chIL-34 treatment for 72 h. ChIL-34 treatment induced NO production in the HD11 (43.37 µM) and OU2 (40.08 µM) cell lines (Figure S1D). The concentration of NO was higher in HD11 than in OU2 cells after treatment with chIL-34 and higher after treatment with chIL-34 than in the control, anti-CSF-1R, or combined anti-CSF-1R antibody and chIL-34 stimulation conditions. These results suggest that chIL-34 affects cell proliferation and induces the production of reactive oxygen species in the form of NO.

2.2. ChIL-34 Regulates CSF-1R Signaling in Chicken Cell Lines

To study the ligand–receptor system, we first examined if CSF-1R, a receptor for IL-34, is expressed in chicken cell lines. We performed real-time quantitative (qRT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for CSF-1R mRNA in the chicken cell lines HD11 and OU2 and demonstrated that CSF-1R was expressed in both cell lines (Figure 1A), whereas IL-34 was not. The expression of CSF-1R in HD11 and OU2 cells as assessed by qRT-PCR was significantly increased after 30 min of treatment with recombinant chIL-34 (Figure 1B). The protein expression level of CSF-1R was confirmed by western blotting (Figure 1C) and by immunofluorescence staining (Figure 1D) using specific antibodies against phosphorylated (p)-CSF-1R. We observed CSF-1R expression and cellular localization in both immune cell types by qRT-PCR, western blot, and immunocytochemical staining after treatment with chIL-34.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R) is expressed in chicken cell lines. (A) Expression of CSF-1R analyzed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) on mRNA derived from chicken cell lines as indicated. (B) CSF-1R mRNA expression in macrophage (HD11) cells (above) and fibroblast (OU2) cells (below) induced by interleukin-34 (IL-34), measured by qRT-PCR and normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). (C,D) CSF-1R protein expression as demonstrated by western blot analysis and immunocytochemical staining with the CSF-1R antibody in HD11 (left) and OU2 (right) cells using an Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bar represents 10 μm. (E) Inhibition of chicken CSF-1R mRNA expression by CSF1R-specific siRNA in HD11 and OU2 cell lines. Cells were transfected with non-siRNA, siCSF1R-1, and siCSF-1R-2 for 48 h and subjected to qRT-PCR analysis. (F) After transfection with siCSF-1R-1, siCSF1R-2, or non-siRNA, cells were stimulated with recombinant chIL-34 (200 ng/mL) for 24 h (non-siRNA used as a negative control). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Moreover, two small interfering RNA (siRNA) sequences that target CSF-1R intracellular (siCSF-1R-1) and extracellular (siCSF-1R-2) regions were evaluated for their capacity to inhibit expression of chicken CSF-1R transcript in HD11 and OU2 cell lines by qRT-PCR after 48 h of transfection (Figure 1E). The siRNA sequences significantly inhibited the expression of CSF-1R mRNA in HD11 and OU2 cells, compared to the nonsense siRNA (non-siRNA); non-treated cells were used as a negative control. Inhibition was most efficient with siCSF-1R-1, which inhibited CSF-1R mRNA expression by up to 78.62% and 80.67% in HD11 and OU2 cell lines, respectively (Figure 1E). To determine the inhibitory effect of the siCSF-1R-1 and siCSF-1R-2 sequences on the signaling molecules, we transfected the cell lines with non-siRNA, siCSF-1R-1, or siCSF-1R-2 for 48 h and stimulated them with recombinant chIL-34 for 24 h. Both cells transfected with siCSF-1R-1 and siCSF-1R-2 and stimulated with chIL-34 had lower expression levels of JAK2, Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2), STAT1, NFKB1, and ERK1 mRNA than the cells treated with non-siRNA. In particular, the expression levels of JAK2, SHP-2, STAT1, NFKB1, and ERK1 mRNA were decreased by 84.02%, 86.65%, 78.51%, 77.42%, and 81.51%, respectively, in HD11 cells (Figure 1F, right) and 82.96%, 77.95%, 82.75%, 76.98%, and 83.95% in OU2 cells, respectively, compared to the levels in the cells treated with non-siRNA (Figure 1F, left). In addition, the low expression of CSF-1R protein was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining using specific antibodies against p-CSF-1R after transfection with siCSF-1R-1 and stimulation with recombinant chIL-34 (Figure 1D). Taken together, our results provide new insights into the signaling mechanisms of chIL-34 through CSF-1R.

2.3. ChIL-34 Induces the Phosphorylation of STAT1 and STAT3

Previous reports suggested that IL-34 activates STAT3 phosphorylation in a human fibroblast cell line [23], but the activation of STAT1 phosphorylation by IL-34 has not yet been investigated. To examine the motifs that are phosphorylated in the STATs, we stimulated the chicken cell lines HD11 and OU2 with chIL-34 for various periods. We found that chIL-34 induced serine phosphorylation of STAT1 (Ser727) and STAT3 (Ser727) within 15 min in both cell lines (Figure 2). The levels of p-STAT1 (Ser727) and -STAT3 (Ser727) reached their maxima at 60 min, which was consistent with the qRT-PCR results (Figure 2A,B). In particular, the expression of STAT1 and STAT3 mRNA was upregulated by 10.1- and 7.5-fold, respectively, in HD11 cells, and 2.9- and 2.8-fold, respectively, in OU2 cells 60 min after treatment with chIL-34 (Figure 2). Moreover, strong cellular localization of p-STAT1/3 proteins was observed by immunocytochemical staining in each immune cell type after chIL-34 treatment (Figure S2). The p-STAT1 and p-STAT3 proteins (green) were more strongly expressed in the cytoplasm of the chIL-34-treated cell lines than in that of the untreated cells, with a particularly strong induction in the HD11 cell line. Taken together, these data indicated that p-STAT1 (Ser727) and p-STAT3 (Ser727) are involved in the intracellular signaling induced by chIL-34 in both cell lines tested.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

IL-34 activates the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway. The HD11 (A) and OU2 (B) cell lines were stimulated with or without IL-34 for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. Total lysates were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against total or p-JAK/STAT signaling proteins (top). The changes in mRNA levels of JAK/STAT in cells treated with or without IL-34 were measured by qRT-PCR and levels were normalized to those of GAPDH (below). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

2.4. IL-34 Activates the Phosphorylation of JAK2, SHP-2, and Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling 1 (SOCS1) in Chicken Cell Lines

JAKs are known to be responsible for STAT phosphorylation in response to cytokine stimulation [24]; we investigated the effect of chIL-34 on JAK2 phosphorylation (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) in the chicken cell lines. We treated the cells with or without chIL-34, then performed western blots with anti-JAK2 and anti-p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) antibodies, as shown in Figure 2. Compared with the unstimulated controls, the cells that received recombinant chIL-34 (200 ng/mL) had a strong induction of JAK2 tyrosine phosphorylation after 15 min, which peaked at 60 min and remained until 120 min, in both cell lines (Figure 2). To further assess the functional role of JAK2 in chIL-34 signaling, we performed qRT-PCR and immunocytochemical staining (Figure 2 and Figure S2). We found that p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) expression (green) was strongly increased in the cytoplasm of both cell lines 60 min after treatment with chIL-34, compared to expression in the untreated control cells, and that JAK2 mRNA was markedly increased after 30 min and reached the highest levels after 60 min; there was a greater increase in the HD11 cell line (Figure 2 and Figure S2). These results indicate that chIL-34 regulates the expression and subcellular localization of p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008), resulting in the activation of these signaling molecules and their associated pathways.

SHP-2, a cytoplasmic SH2 domain-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase, is involved in the signaling pathways of a variety of growth factors and cytokines [25]. To assess the levels of p-SHP-2 (Tyr542) in the chicken cell lines, we measured p-SHP-2 (Tyr542) after treatment with chIL-34 by western blot, qRT-PCR, and immunocytochemical staining (Figure 2). The results demonstrated that chIL-34 induced p-SHP-2 (Tyr542), as shown in Figure 2. We also detected substantial levels of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1) protein after 60 min, as with STAT1, STAT3, JAK2, and SHP-2. The expression of SOCS1 mRNA was significantly upregulated by 5.0- and 3.0-fold in HD11 and OU2 cells, respectively, after chIL-34 treatment (Figure 2). These results demonstrated that chIL-34 induced and activated the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, which may activate downstream cytokine production, in chicken HD11 and OU2 cells.

2.5. Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase Kinase 7 (TAK1) by chIL-34

The ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathway regulates cell proliferation, differentiation, and transformation [26]. Previous reports demonstrated that human IL-34 regulated the ERK1/2 MAPK signaling pathway and induced cytokine production [27,28,29]; therefore, we investigated whether chIL-34 affected two major MAPK pathway-related genes, p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204), and p-mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (TAK1) (Ser933) in the chicken cell lines using western blotting, qRT-PCR, and immunocytochemical staining (Figure 3). Compared with the unstimulated controls, the chIL-34-treated (200 ng/mL) cell lines had higher levels of p-ERK1/2 after 15 min, which reached maximum levels by 120 min (Figure 3). Similarly, chIL-34 strongly induced p-TAK1 (Ser933), with maximal induction after 60 min (Figure 3). We found by qRT-PCR and immunocytochemical staining that p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) and TAK1 (Ser933) proteins (visualized as green fluorescence) were strongly upregulated in the cytoplasm after treatment with chIL-34 for 60 min, as compared to controls, and that mRNA expression was highly increased after 60 min, particularly in the HD11 cell line (Figure 3). These results indicate that chIL-34 increases the expression and alters the subcellular localization of p-ERK1/2 (Thr202/Tyr204) and TAK1 (Ser933).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

IL-34 induces phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and p-mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7 (TAK1). The HD11 (A) and OU2 (B) cell lines were treated with or without IL-34 for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. Total lysates were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against p-ERK1/2 and p-TAK1 (top). The changes in mRNA levels for ERK1/2 and TAK1 in cells treated with or without IL-34 were analyzed by qRT-PCR in chicken cell lines and levels were normalized to those of GAPDH (middle). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments: * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. Immunocytochemical analysis of p-ERK1/2 and p-TAK1 signaling proteins in HD11 (left) and OU2 (right) cells. Untreated cells and those treated with chIL-34 were incubated with primary antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody, and DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 25 μm.

2.6. ChIL-34 Activates NF-κB1 and MyD88

NF-κB is a protein complex that plays an important role in the regulation of transcription, cytokine production, cell survival, cellular responses, and immune responses to infection [30]. To explore if NF-κB signaling pathways are activated in chicken HD11 and OU2 cell lines treated with recombinant chIL-34, we evaluated p-NF-κB1 (Ser192) and MyD88 expression by western blot and immunocytochemical staining with phospho-specific antibodies and qRT-PCR. The p-NF-κB1 (Ser192) and MyD88 antibodies displayed a similar staining pattern in the cells after treatment with chIL-34 (Figure 4). NF-κB1 (Ser192) and MyD88 expression reached maximum levels after 60 min of treatment, as indicated by western blotting, in both cell lines. These genes were significantly induced by 17.45- and 2.96-fold (NFKB1), and 5.45- and 4.84-fold (MYD88) in the HD11 and OU2 cell lines, respectively (Figure 4). Moreover, the expression levels of p-NF-κB1 (Ser192) and MyD88 protein (green) were strongly increased by chIL-34 in the nucleus or cytoplasm compared with the expression in untreated cells. These results suggested that chIL-34 regulates the expression and subcellular localization of p-NF-κB1 (Ser192) and MyD88 and indicated that chIL-34 activates NF-κB1 and MyD88 signaling in chicken cell lines.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

IL-34 induces phosphorylation of NF-κB1 and MyD88. The HD11 (A) and OU2 (B) cell lines were treated with or without IL-34 for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min. Total lysates were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against p-NF-κB1 and MyD88 (top). The changes in the levels of mRNA for NFKB1 and MYD88 in cells treated with or without chIL-34 were measured by qRT-PCR and levels were normalized to those of GAPDH (middle). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Immunocytochemical analysis of p-NF-κB1 and MyD88 signaling proteins in HD11 (left) and OU2 (right) cells. Both untreated cells and those treated with chIL-34 were incubated with primary antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary antibody and DAPI (blue). Scale bar represents 25 μm.

2.7. Treatment with chIL-34 Upregulates Cytokine Expression

To determine cytokine gene expression in HD11 and OU2 cell lines, qRT-PCR was performed following recombinant chIL-34 treatment. The expression levels of cytokine genes in the HD11 and OU2 cell lines with and without treatment are shown in Figure 5. When the HD11 macrophage cell line was co-cultured with chIL-34 protein, the expression levels of the Th1-type cytokines IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, and IL-1β were significantly increased, particularly after 60 or 120 min of treatment (Figure 5A). We also examined the effects of chIL-34 on the pro-inflammatory mediator lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF) factor (LITAF); LITAF was upregulated by 2.74-fold in the HD11 cell line after treatment with chIL-34 for 60 min (Figure 5A). Moreover, Th17-type cytokine genes, including IL-12p40, IL-17A, and IL-17D, were highly upregulated in the HD11 cell line by 4.97-, 4.0-, and 2.73-fold, respectively, following chIL-34 treatment (Figure 5A). In addition, we investigated the expression of Th1 and Th17 cytokines in the OU2 cell line following treatment with chIL-34 protein. The results were similar to those in the HD11 cell line (Figure 5B); however, gene expression in HD11 cells was generally higher than in OU2 cells (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The expression levels of cytokines induced by chicken IL-34 (chIL-34) in HD11 (A) and OU2 (B) cell lines. Levels are normalized to those of GAPDH. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

Moreover, we measured the Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th17 (IL-17A and IL-12p40) cytokine production in the supernatants of the chIL-34-treated cultures by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (Table 1). The results revealed significantly higher IFN-γ protein levels (415.09 and 164.36 ng/mL in HD11 and OU2 cell lines, respectively) in IL-34-treated cells compared to mock controls (17–22 ng/mL) (Table 1). Moreover, Th17 cytokine protein production was significantly upregulated by chIL-34 treatment in all tested cells (Table 1). In particular, IL-17A and IL-12p40 were produced at markedly high levels in the HD11 cell line (259.28 and 247.66 ng/mL, respectively) and the OU2 cell line (148.39 and 106.73 ng/mL, respectively) (Table 1). These results indicated that chIL-34 more strongly induced Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th17 (IL-17A and IL-12p40) cytokines in HD11 cells than in OU2 cells. Taken together, these results suggest that chIL-34 induces Th1 and Th17 cytokine production in vitro in the HD11 and OU2 cell lines.

Table 1.

Colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF-1R) neutralization with a CSF-1R antibody decreased recombinant chicken IL-34 (chIL-34)-induced cytokine production in chicken cell lines.

Cytokines (ng/mL) Control IL-34 IL-34 + Anti-CSF-1R % Reduction Cell Line
IFN-γ 22.59 415.09 *** 160.01 * 61.45 HD11
IL-17A 6.67 259.28 ** 101.39 * 60.90
IL-12p40 4.17 247.66 * 40.95 83.47
IFN-γ 17.45 164.36 * 51.43 68.71 OU2
IL-17A 4.02 148.39 * 53.97 63.63
IL-12p40 3.44 106.73 * 32.18 69.85

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3) of 3 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

2.8. Blockade of CSF-1R Reduces Cytokine Production in Chicken Cell Lines

To confirm the role of IL-34 in the regulation of cytokine production through CSF-1R signaling, we cultured both chicken cell lines with a neutralizing CSF-1R antibody and measured Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th17 (IL-17A and IL-12p40) cytokine expression by ELISA. In each experiment, treatment with the CSF-1R antibody reduced Th1 (IFN-γ) and Th17 (IL-17A and IL-12p40) cytokine secretion by 60–83% (Table 1). These results indicated that chIL-34 activates and induces cytokine production in chicken cell lines through CSF-1R signaling. The differing levels of expression by the HD11 and OU2 cell lines may reflect cell-specific differences in responsiveness to stimulation or the capacity to produce cytokines.

3. Discussion

In this study, we analyzed the signaling pathways activated by chIL-34 in the chicken cell lines HD11 and OU2, as summarized in Figure 6, and compared the functions of chicken and mammalian IL-34 (Table 2). Our results indicated that chIL-34 binds to CSF-1R; this association, which induces the phosphorylation of JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008), is required for chIL-34 signaling. After phosphorylation by JAKs, STAT proteins form homo- and heterodimeric complexes and translocate into the nucleus, where they bind to specific consensus sequences of target gene promoters and modulate gene expression [31,32,33]. We also detected phosphorylation of p-STAT1 (Ser727) and p-STAT3 (Ser727) by western blotting and immunocytochemical staining and STAT1/3 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR (Figure 2 and Figure S2). These data indicate that chIL-34 activated JAK/STAT proteins through CSF-1R signaling in chicken cell lines. Moreover, the SH2 domain of SHP-2 is known to bind to JAK2 [25], and STAT1 and STAT3 are recruited by its SH2 domain to a phosphotyrosine site in CSF-1R [34]. The expression of p-SHP-2 (Tyr542) protein and mRNA showed a pattern similar to p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) and p-STAT1/3 (Ser727) after chIL-34 treatment in both cell lines. These results show that chIL-34 binds to CSF-1R and activates p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008), p-STAT1/3 (Ser727), and p-SHP-2 (Tyr542).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Summary and model for the potential function of the chIL-34 signaling pathway.

Table 2.

Comparison the function of interleukin (IL)-34 in mammals and chickens.

Category Mammalian IL-34; Review in [35] Chicken IL-34
Protein 241 aa, 39 kDa 178 aa, 20.3 kDa
Proliferation Osteoclast precursors →
Microglia →
Macrophages →
Endothelial cells →
Osteosarcoma cells →
Macrophages →
Fibroblast cells →
Differentiation Human CD14+ monocytes ↗
Murine CD11b+ cells ↗
Macrophages ↗
PBMCs ↗
Memory T cells ↗
FDMCs ↗
Molecular signaling pathways ↑ p-ERK1/2, p-Src, p-p38, p-Akt, p-STAT3, p-JNK, p-NF-κB1 ↑ p-STAT1, p-STAT3, p-JAK2, p-TAK1, p-SHP-2, p-NF-κB1, p-ERK1/2, STAT1, STAT3, JAK2, TYK2, SOCS1, MyD88
Th1 cytokines ↑ IL-1β, IFNγ ↑ IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-γ, IL-1β
Th17 cytokines ↑ IL-12, IL-17 ↑ IL-12, IL-17A, IL-17D
Th2 cytokines ↑ IL-10
Chemokines ↑ CXCL10, CXCL8, CCL2, CCR2, CCL20, MIG
Pro-inflammatory cytokines ↑ TNF-α, IL-6, ↑ LITAF
Other cytokines ↑ TGF-β, TRAP, VEGF
Inflammation IL-34-macrophages ¥
Colon epithelial cells →
LPMCs →
Microglia ¥
M1 macrophages ¥
Human whole blood →
Cell surface marker ↑ CD161, membrane IL-1α, CD163

PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; FDMCs, follicular DC-induced monocytic cells; CCL, CC chemokine ligand; LPMCs, lamina propria mononuclear cells; CXCL, chemokine (C-X-C Motif) Ligand; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor. “↑”, up-regulation; “→”, promote; “↗”, induce; “¥“, inhibit.

SOCS1 plays an important role in the negative regulation of JAK/STAT signaling [24]. The SOCS1 gene is activated in response to STAT-mediated mechanisms and the protein interacts with the catalytic domains of JAK proteins [24]. In the present study, upregulated SOCS1 mRNA and protein were observed in HD11 and OU2 cell lines after chIL-34 treatment. These results suggest that SOCS1 regulates the signaling pathway downstream of chIL-34, which is important to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, this study provides the first evidence indicating the possible role of the JAK/STAT pathway in the signaling mechanism of chIL-34 in chicken cell lines.

Moreover, the NF-κB signaling pathways are central regulators of innate and adaptive immune responses in humans [36,37]. IL-34 induces cytokine expression through the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [3,38]; however, the role of NF-κB signaling induced by IL-34 in the chicken was previously unknown. Therefore, we demonstrated by western blotting and immunocytochemical staining that chIL-34 activates NF-κB1 and MyD88, which is a key regulator of NF-κB signaling pathways. Previous studies have demonstrated that the interaction between STAT1 and NF-κB1 plays a key role in regulating gene promoters and increases innate and adaptive immune responses, such as the production of chemokines [36] and Th1 and Th17 cytokines [30,39]. In addition, STAT3/NF-κB1 signaling plays an important role the development and progression of colon, gastric, and liver cancers, as well as the control of immune responses [37,40]. Our findings indicated that chIL-34 induced JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling and interaction and that the communication between STAT1/3 (Ser727) and NF-κB1 (Ser933) may control the expression of the cytokines and immune mediators shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. On the other hand, p-TAK1 and p-ERK1/2 MAPK are activated by pro-inflammatory cytokines and the Toll-like receptor family [41,42]. TAK1 works with TGF-β-activated kinase binding protein family genes to activate downstream kinases, leading to NF-κB1 activation and MAPK signaling [41,42]. Previous research indicated that TAK1 induced the serine phosphorylation of STAT3 [41,42], and that the association between TAK1 and JAK led to the regulation of the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines through NF-κB1 activation [43]. In addition, the associations among the ERK1/2, MAPK (Thr202/Tyr204), JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) [44], STAT1/3 (Ser727) [45,46], SHP-2 (Tyr542) [31], PI3K/AKT, and p38 signaling pathways [26] participate in the control of cell differentiation, development, proliferation, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in several cell types, such as epithelial cells and macrophages. Our results indicated that chIL-34 activates JAK/STAT, NF-κB, and MAPK signaling pathways; the JAK/STAT signaling pathway may play a role in cross-talk between the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways for chIL-34-induced cytokine production.

In humans, IL-34 may have a pro-inflammatory effect and contribute to inflammation in several diseases [5]. We found that the expression levels of IFN-γ, IL-17A, and IL-12p40 were more highly increased in the HD11 than the OU2 cell line after treatment with chIL-34, and were more notably reduced by the CSF-1R antibody (Table 2). In addition, chIL-34 induced other Th1 (IFNα, IFNβ, and IL-1β) and Th17 (IL-17D) cytokines and the pro-inflammatory mediator LITAF; these results indicated that chIL-34 may be pro-inflammatory and activate the JAK/STAT, NF-κB, and MAPK signaling pathways, thereby upregulating the expression of Th1 and Th17 cytokines. Furthermore, this study indicates that IL-34 is essential for cell-mediated immune responses and could be a potential therapeutic protein in chickens.

In summary, this is the first report to describe the signal transduction downstream of chIL-34. Our results showed that chIL-34 activates JAK2, tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2), STAT1/3, NF-κB, and MAPK signaling pathways through CSF-1R signaling, which upregulates the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in chicken macrophage and fibroblast cell lines. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the role of chIL-34 in controlling Th1 and Th17 pro-inflammatory gene transcription via multiple signaling pathways.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. ChIL-34 Protein Production

To clone full-length chIL-34, the predicted chIL-34 coding sequence (GenBank accession # XM_003641892) was amplified from total RNA of the intestinal mucosal layer using the restriction enzyme-anchored primers in Table 3. Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) as described [47] from the intestinal mucosal layer of White Leghorn chickens, kindly provided by the Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory (Beltsville, MD, USA) of the USDA Agricultural Research Service; the RNA was stored at −80 °C. The first-strand cDNA was subsequently synthesized using a Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). PCR was performed to amplify the full-length chIL-34 cDNA under the following conditions: Initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The methods for cloning, transformation, and protein purification were previously described [47]. Briefly, the recombinant chIL-34 protein was purified using HisPur™ Cobalt Resin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the first purification step, per the manufacturer’s instructions. To remove the endotoxin contaminants, we combined affinity chromatography with a non-ionic detergent washing step as previously described [48]. The purified protein was concentrated and the buffer was changed by ultrafiltration using a 3000-molecular weight-cutoff membrane (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The samples were dialyzed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2) overnight using SnakeSkin™ dialysis tubing (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with stirring, then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. ELISAs demonstrated that the 2-step purification of the recombinant protein facilitated a drastic depletion of endotoxin contaminants (<0.006 EU/mL) (MyBioSource, San Diego, CA, USA; Figure S1A), performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A single chIL-34 protein band with an apparent molecular mass of approximately 41.0 kDa was observed by western blot using the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-His (C-Term) antibody (1:3000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (Figure S1B), as described below. The larger size than predicted (20.3 kDa) was due to the 3 epitope tags (polyhistidine, S-protein, and thioredoxin) in the recombinant protein.

Table 3.

Primer sequences for qRT-PCR analyses of gene expression levels.

Gene F/R Nucleotide Sequence (5′-3′) Accession No.
GAPDH F TGCTGCCCAGAACATCATCC NM_204305
R ACGGCAGGTCAGGTCAACAA
IL-34 F CGGAATTCATGCACCAGGGCTGCGCGGC XM_003641892
R CCAAGCTTAGCGGAGTCCCACCGACAGTG
STAT1 F TTGTAACTTCGCTATTGGTATTCC NM_001012914
R TTCCGTGATGTGTCTTCCTTC
STAT3 F AGGGCCAGGTGTGAACTACT NM_001030931
R CCAGCCAGACCCAGAAAG
SOCS1 F CTACTGGGGACCGCTGACC NM_001137648
R TTAACACTGATGGCAAAGAAACAA
JAK2 F CAGATTTCAGGCCGTCATTT NM_001030538
R ATCCAAGAGCTCCAGTTCGTAT
SHP-2 F ATGTTGGTGGAGGGGAGAA NM_204968
R GGGGCTGCTTGAGTTGC
TAK1 F CCAGGAAACGGACAGCAGAG XM_015284677
R GGTTGGTCCCGAGGTAGTGA
NFKB1 F AGAAAAGCTGGGTCTTGGCA NM_205134
R CCATCTGTGTCAAAGCAGCG
ERK1 F GCAAGCTTTAGCCCATCCA NM_204150
R GTCATCCAATTCCATATCAAACTT
ERK2 F CATCGCGACCTCAAACCTTC AAK56503
R TCCGGATCTGCAACACGAG
MYD88 F GGTTCTGGACAAGACTGGCA NM_001030962
R ATGCTGTAGGAACACCGTGG
CSF-1R F ACGGGTAGCCAAGATTTGTG XM_414597
R AGAATGCCGTAGGACCACAC
IFN-α F AACCACCCACGACATCCTTC NM_205427
R CAAGCATTGCTCGAGGTGC
IFN-β F CTTGCCCACAACAAGACGTG NM_001024836
R GTGTTTTGGAGTGTGTGGGC
IFN-γ R AACAACCTTCCTGATGGCGT NM_205149.1
F TGAAGAGTTCATTCGCGGCT
IL-17A F TGTCTCCGATCCCTTGTTCT AM773756
R GTCCTGGCCGTATCACCTT
IL-17D F ACCCCACAAGATACCCTAAATAC EF570583
R GTGCTGCGGAAGTGAAAAT
IL-12p40 F AGATGCTGGCAACTACACCTG NM_213571
R CATTTGCCCATTGGAGTCTAC
LITAF F AGCTGACGGTGGACCTATTATT AY765397
R GGCTTTGCGCTGGATTC
IL-1β F TGCCTGCAGAAG AAGCCTCG NM_204524
R CTCCGCAGCAGTTTGGTCAT
siCSF1R-1 F ACAGAUCCCUCAGACACAU XM_414597
R AUGUGUCUGAGGGAUCUGU
siCSF1R-2 F GUGAACAGCAAGUUCUACA XM_414597
R UGUAGAACUUGCUGUUCAC

Restriction enzyme sites are underlined in the forward (EcoRI) and reverse primers (HindIII). F: forward, R: reverse, No.: number.

4.2. Chicken Cell Lines and Treatment with chIL-34

The macrophage (HD11) [49] and fibroblast (OU2) [50] cell lines were kindly provided by Dr. Hyun S. Lillehoj’s Laboratory at the Agricultural Research Service, USDA. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen) containing 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Invitrogen) in a humidified 5%-CO2 atmosphere at 41 °C. To elucidate chIL-34 activity, HD11 and OU2 cells (1.0 × 106/well) were stimulated in 6-well plates with recombinant chIL-34 (200 ng/mL) for 15, 30, 60, and 120 min, in DMEM with 10% FBS plus antibiotics, unless otherwise indicated. In all experiments, the control groups were cultured in only DMEM with 10% FBS plus antibiotics. The final concentration of chIL-34 was based on pilot experiments that demonstrated a marked effect of the recombinant protein on the activation of certain kinases. After incubation, the cell supernatants were collected to evaluate cytokine production by ELISA, then cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and harvested in ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 2 mM EDTA; 100 mM NaF; 0.1% SDS; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 1% Triton X-100; 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate; and 10 mM sodium orthovanadate) containing complete™ EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for protein analysis. Cells were gently lysed for 30 min at 4 °C and centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration was determined using the Coomassie (Bradford) Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in microplates, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the cells were stimulated with chIL-34 and cultured with or without neutralizing CSF-1R antibody (10 μg/mL) for 72 h in DMEM with 10% FBS plus antibiotics, then cytokine expression levels were evaluated in cell-free culture supernatants by ELISA.

4.3. RNA Interference Assay

The chicken cell lines were transfected with 500 pmol chicken CSF-1R-specific small interfering RNA (siCSF-1R-1 and siCSF-1R-2; Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea; Table 1) using Lipofectamine® 3000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and as previously described [51]. Briefly, HD11 and OU2 cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and transfected with siRNA–Lipofectamine complexes. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were stimulated with recombinant chIL-34 for another 24 h. Total RNA isolation was performed as described below and RNA was used for the analysis of signaling molecules by qRT-PCR. Non-siRNA was used as a negative control for non-sequence-specific effects (Bioneer).

4.4. ELISA

We coated a 96-well plate (Nunc MaxiSorp®, Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) with dilutions (1:500) of monoclonal anti-IFN-γ, anti-IL-12p40, or anti-IL-17A antibodies for 7 days at 4 °C, as previously described [51]. After blocking with 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature (RT, 25 °C), the plate was incubated with culture supernatants or different dilutions of recombinant IFN-γ, IL-12p40, or IL-17A overnight at 4 °C. Following incubation with a biotinylated-IFN-γ, -IL-12p40 or -IL-17A antibody (1:500), HRP-conjugated streptavidin (1:5000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added. The substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (100 µL/well; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as a chemiluminescent substrate and luminescence was measured in a Hybrid Microplate Reader (Epoch, BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA).

4.5. Western Blotting

Protein (100 μg) was mixed at a 1:1 v/v ratio with 2× sample buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 2% SDS; 6 M urea; 10% β-mercaptoethanol; and 20% glycerol) and heated to 100 °C for 5 min. Samples were electrophoresed on 12% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (GE Healthcare, Marlborough, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.05% TWEEN® 20 (PBST) for 3 h at RT. Primary antibodies (1:1000; against STAT1/3, JAK2, SOCS1, TYK2, TAK1, SHP-2, CSF-1R, NF-κB1, MyD88, ERK1/2, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [GAPDH]) were prepared in either 2% skim milk or 0.5% BSA in PBST overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were washed with PBST and treated with the HRP-linked anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:4000; Sigma-Aldrich) or goat anti-mouse IgG HRP conjugate (1:4000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 2% skim milk or 0.5% BSA in PBST for 2 h at RT. Subsequently, the membranes were developed using western Lightning® Plus-ECL (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on Hyperfilm™ (GE Healthcare).

4.6. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® (Invitrogen), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was diluted with 20 µL RNase-free H2O and the concentration was determined using the Hybrid Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments). For cDNA synthesis, up to 2 µg RNA was treated with 1.0 U DNase I and 1.0 μL of 10× reaction buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), then incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, to inactivate DNase I, 50 mM EDTA (1.0 μL) was added and the mixture was heated to 65 °C for 10 min, then reverse-transcribed using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.

4.7. qRT-PCR Gene Expression Assay

To analyze the expression of cytokines, we designed primers using Lasergene software (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA) (Table 1) and performed qRT-PCR using 2× Power SYBR® Green Master Mix (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with the LightCycler® 96 system (Roche). The cycle number when the fluorescence first reached a preset threshold was used to quantify the initial concentration of the individual templates for the expression of the mRNA of genes of interest. Chicken GAPDH was used as an internal control gene to normalize for RNA quantity. The relative gene-specific expression was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method after normalization to GAPDH [52]. All qRT-PCRs were performed in triplicate.

4.8. Immunocytochemistry

We performed immunocytochemistry using chamber slides, as previously described [53,54,55]. Briefly, cells (2.0 × 103/well) were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS plus antibiotics in a chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with or without recombinant chIL-34 (200 ng/mL), for 1 h in a humidified 5%-CO2 atmosphere incubator at 41 °C. Then, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (pH 7.4) for 15 min and incubated in PBS containing 0.25% Triton™ X-100 for 10 min at RT. Thereafter, the cells were blocked with blocking buffer (200 µL/well; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 45 min at RT. Following overnight incubation with the primary antibody (1:500; against STAT1/3, JAK2, SOCS1, TAK1, CSF-1R, NF-κB1, MyD88, or ERK1/2) overnight at 4 °C, cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated secondary antibody (2 µg/mL, Invitrogen) for 1 h and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for 5 min at RT. Finally, images were captured on an EVOS® FLoid® Cell Imaging Station (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.9. Reagents

The rabbit anti-chicken p-STAT1 (Ser727), rabbit anti-chicken p-STAT3 (Ser727), and rabbit anti-chicken p-JAK2 (Tyr1007/Tyr1008) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotech (Dallas, TX, USA). The following reagents were either purchased from or provided by each respective company: Rabbit antibodies against chicken TYK2, p-TAK1 (Ser192), p-SHP-2 (Tyr542), p-CSF-1R (Tyr809), and p-NF-κB1 (Ser933, p50/100) and mouse antibodies against chicken JAK2 (Biorbyt, San Francisco, CA, USA); rabbit antibodies against chicken SOCS1, chicken STAT1, and chicken STAT3 and HRP-linked anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich); mouse antibodies against chicken GAPDH (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); anti-chicken MyD88 antibody (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA); Alexa Fluor® 488-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) secondary and HRP-linked anti-His (C-Term) antibodies (Invitrogen); rabbit antibody against chicken p-44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA); mouse polyclonal anti-chicken IL-12p40 antibody (Kingfisher Biotech, St. Paul, MN, USA); and mouse monoclonal anti-chicken IFN-γ [56] and IL-17A [57] antibodies (kindly provided by Hyun S. Lillehoj, USDA). We also purchased EZ-Link™ Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin, HRP-conjugated streptavidin, and goat anti-mouse IgG HRP conjugate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DAPI (Invitrogen).

4.10. Bioactivity Assays

Cells (1.0 × 103 cells/well) were seeded and cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS plus antibiotics in 96-well plates. After overnight culture, recombinant chIL-34 was added at the specified concentrations for 72 h. To measure the NO content, culture medium (100 µL) was incubated with Griess reagent (100 µL; Sigma-Aldrich) at RT for 10 min. Then, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader, as previously described [58]. The nitrite content was calculated based on a standard curve constructed with NaNO2. Cell proliferation was determined with the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay (Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Kumamoto, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s protocol as previously described [59].

4.11. Statistical Analysis

Measurement data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least 3 replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software (SPSS 23.0 for Windows; IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests and Duncan’s multiple comparison method were carried out to detect the differences. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Abbreviations

ANOVA analysis of variance
BSA bovine serum albumin
chIL-34 chicken IL-34
CSF-1R CSF-1 receptor
CSF-1 colony-stimulating factor 1
DAPI 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
DMEM Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium,
ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ERK1/2 extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2
FBS fetal bovine serum
GAPDH glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
HRP horseradish peroxidase
IL interleukin
JAK Janus kinase
MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinases
M-CSF macrophage colony-stimulating factor
NF-κB nuclear factor kappa B
NO nitric oxide
non-siRNA nonsense small interfering RNA
p- phosphorylated
PBS phosphate-buffered saline
PBST PBS containing 0.05% TWEEN® 20
PCR polymerase chain reaction
qRT quantitative real-time
RT room temperature
SEM standard error of the mean
SHP-2 Src homology 2-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2
siRNA small interfering RNA, siCSF-1R-1
siRNA sequence that targets intracellular CSF-1R
siCSF-1R-2 siRNA sequence that targets extracellular CSF-1R
SOCS suppressor of cytokine signaling
STAT signal transducer and activator of transcription
TAK1 mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 7
TNF tumor necrosis factor
TYK2 tyrosine kinase 2

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at http://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/6/1665/s1.

Author Contributions

The author(s) have declared their contributions to the study. Conceived and designed the experiments: A.D.T., Y.H.H. Performed the experiments: A.D.T., K.L., J.L., and Y.H. Analyzed the data: A.D.T. and Y.H.H. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: Y.H.H., D.Y.K, and H.S.L. Wrote the paper: A.D.T., Y.H.H. Interpreted the data: A.D.T., Y.H.H.

Funding

This research was partly supported by a National Research Foundation grant (NRF-2015R1D1A1A09059345) of the Republic of Korea and NIFA grant (#2017-6701526793) of USDA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Mizuno T., Doi Y., Mizoguchi H., Jin S., Noda M., Sonobe Y., Takeuchi H., Suzumura A. Interleukin-34 selectively enhances the neuroprotective effects of microglia to attenuate oligomeric amyloid-beta neurotoxicity. Am. J. Pathol. 2011;179:2016–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hwang S.J., Choi B., Kang S.S., Chang J.H., Kim Y.G., Chung Y.H., Sohn D.H., So M.W., Lee C.K., Robinson W.H., et al. Interleukin-34 produced by human fibroblast-like synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis supports osteoclastogenesis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2012;14:R14. doi: 10.1186/ar3693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bostrom E.A., Lundberg P. The newly discovered cytokine IL-34 is expressed in gingival fibroblasts, shows enhanced expression by pro-inflammatory cytokines, and stimulates osteoclast differentiation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakamichi Y., Udagawa N., Takahashi N. IL-34 and CSF-1: Similarities and differences. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2013;31:486–495. doi: 10.1007/s00774-013-0476-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chemel M., Le Goff B., Brion R., Cozic C., Berreur M., Amiaud J., Bougras G., Touchais S., Blanchard F., Heymann M.F., et al. Interleukin 34 expression is associated with synovitis severity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2012;71:150–154. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chang E.J., Lee S.K., Song Y.S., Jang Y.J., Park H.S., Hong J.P., Ko A.R., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H., Lee Y.J., et al. IL-34 is associated with obesity, chronic inflammation, and insulin resistance. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:E1263–E1271. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Felix J., Elegheert J., Gutsche I., Shkumatov A.V., Wen Y., Bracke N., Pannecoucke E., Vandenberghe I., Devreese B., Svergun D.I., et al. Human IL-34 and CSF-1 establish structurally similar extracellular assemblies with their common hematopoietic receptor. Structure. 2013;21:528–539. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.01.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thompson K.M., Uetani N., Manitt C., Elchebly M., Tremblay M.L., Kennedy T.E. Receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase sigma inhibits axonal regeneration and the rate of axon extension. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2003;23:681–692. doi: 10.1016/S1044-7431(03)00120-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nandi S., Cioce M., Yeung Y.G., Nieves E., Tesfa L., Lin H., Hsu A.W., Halenbeck R., Cheng H.Y., Gokhan S., et al. Receptor-type Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase zeta Is a Functional Receptor for Interleukin-34. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:21972–21986. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.442731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Masteller E.L., Wong B.R. Targeting IL-34 in chronic inflammation. Drug Discov. Today. 2014;19:1212–1216. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chen Z., Buki K., Vaaraniemi J., Gu G., Vaananen H.K. The critical role of IL-34 in osteoclastogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Greter M., Lelios I., Pelczar P., Hoeffel G., Price J., Leboeuf M., Kundig T.M., Frei K., Ginhoux F., Merad M., et al. Stroma-derived interleukin-34 controls the development and maintenance of langerhans cells and the maintenance of microglia. Immunity. 2012;37:1050–1060. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Foucher E.D., Blanchard S., Preisser L., Garo E., Ifrah N., Guardiola P., Delneste Y., Jeannin P. IL-34 induces the differentiation of human monocytes into immunosuppressive macrophages. antagonistic effects of GM-CSF and IFNgamma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56045. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xu R., Sun H.F., Williams D.W., Jones A.V., Al-Hussaini A., Song B., Wei X.Q. IL-34 Suppresses Candida albicans Induced TNFalpha Production in M1 Macrophages by Downregulating Expression of Dectin-1 and TLR2. J. Immunol. Res. 2015;2015:328146. doi: 10.1155/2015/328146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang Y., Szretter K.J., Vermi W., Gilfillan S., Rossini C., Cella M., Barrow A.D., Diamond M.S., Colonna M. IL-34 is a tissue-restricted ligand of CSF1R required for the development of Langerhans cells and microglia. Nat. Immunol. 2012;13:753–760. doi: 10.1038/ni.2360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tian Y., Shen H., Xia L., Lu J. Elevated Serum and Synovial Fluid Levels of Interleukin-34 in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Possible Association with Disease Progression via Interleukin-17 Production. J. Interf. Cytokine Res. 2013;33:398–401. doi: 10.1089/jir.2012.0122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Preisser L., Miot C., Le Guillou-Guillemette H., Beaumont E., Foucher E.D., Garo E., Blanchard S., Fremaux I., Croue A., Fouchard I., et al. IL-34 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor are overexpressed in hepatitis C virus fibrosis and induce profibrotic macrophages that promote collagen synthesis by hepatic stellate cells. Hepatology. 2014;60:1879–1890. doi: 10.1002/hep.27328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu G., Bing Y., Zhu S., Li W., Xia L., Li Y., Liu Z. Activation of the interleukin-34 inflammatory pathway in response to influenza A virus infection. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2015;349:145–150. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shoji H., Yoshio S., Mano Y., Kumagai E., Sugiyama M., Korenaga M., Arai T., Itokawa N., Atsukawa M., Aikata H., et al. Interleukin-34 as a fibroblast-derived marker of liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:28814. doi: 10.1038/srep28814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zou Y., Li G., Wang L. Colony-stimulating factor 1 should be considered when studying the miR-28-5p-IL-34-macrophage feedback loop in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2016;63:1560–1575. doi: 10.1002/hep.28445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhou S.L., Hu Z.Q., Zhou Z.J., Dai Z., Wang Z., Cao Y., Fan J., Huang X.W., Zhou J. miR-28-5p-IL-34-macrophage feedback loop modulates hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis. Hepatology. 2016;63:1560–1575. doi: 10.1002/hep.28445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garceau V., Smith J., Paton I.R., Davey M., Fares M.A., Sester D.P., Burt D.W., Hume D.A. Pivotal Advance: Avian colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1), interleukin-34 (IL-34), and CSF-1 receptor genes and gene products. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010;87:753–764. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0909624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang S., Jiang S., Wang Y., Tu S., Wang Z., Chen Z. Interleukin 34 Upregulation Contributes to the Increment of MicroRNA 21 Expression through STAT3 Activation Associated with Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2016;43:1312–1319. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.151253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heim M.H. The Jak-STAT pathway: Specific signal transduction from the cell membrane to the nucleus. Eur. J. Clin. Investig. 1996;26:1–12. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1996.103248.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Godeny M.D., Sayyah J., VonDerLinden D., Johns M., Ostrov D.A., Caldwell-Busby J., Sayeski P.P. The N-terminal SH2 domain of the tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-2, is essential for Jak2-dependent signaling via the angiotensin II type AT1 receptor. Cell. Signal. 2007;19:600–609. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lake D., Correa S.A., Muller J. Negative feedback regulation of the ERK1/2 MAPK pathway. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS. 2016;73:4397–4413. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2297-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen T., Wang X., Guo L., Wu M., Duan Z., Lv J., Tai W., Renganathan H., Didier R., Li J., et al. Embryonic Stem Cells Promoting Macrophage Survival and Function are Crucial for Teratoma Development. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:275. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Franze E., Monteleone I., Cupi M.L., Mancia P., Caprioli F., Marafini I., Colantoni A., Ortenzi A., Laudisi F., Sica G., et al. Interleukin-34 sustains inflammatory pathways in the gut. Clin. Sci. 2015;129:271–280. doi: 10.1042/CS20150132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Franze E., Marafini I., De Simone V., Monteleone I., Caprioli F., Colantoni A., Ortenzi A., Crescenzi F., Izzo R., Sica G., et al. Interleukin-34 Induces Cc-chemokine Ligand 20 in Gut Epithelial Cells. J. Crohn’s Colitis. 2016;10:87–94. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kramer O.H., Baus D., Knauer S.K., Stein S., Jager E., Stauber R.H., Grez M., Pfitzner E., Heinzel T. Acetylation of Stat1 modulates NF-kappaB activity. Genes Dev. 2006;20:473–485. doi: 10.1101/gad.364306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ottani A., Galantucci M., Ardimento E., Neri L., Canalini F., Calevro A., Zaffe D., Novellino E., Grieco P., Giuliani D., et al. Modulation of the JAK/ERK/STAT signaling in melanocortin-induced inhibition of local and systemic responses to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion. Pharmacol. Res. 2013;72:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Truong A.D., Rengaraj D., Hong Y., Hoang C.T., Hong Y.H., Lillehoj H.S. Differentially expressed JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes and target microRNAs in the spleen of necrotic enteritis-afflicted chicken lines. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017;115:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Truong A.D., Rengaraj D., Hong Y., Hoang C.T., Hong Y.H., Lillehoj H.S. Analysis of JAK-STAT signaling pathway genes and their microRNAs in the intestinal mucosa of genetically disparate chicken lines induced with necrotic enteritis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2017;187:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wei S., Nandi S., Chitu V., Yeung Y.G., Yu W., Huang M., Williams L.T., Lin H., Stanley E.R. Functional overlap but differential expression of CSF-1 and IL-34 in their CSF-1 receptor-mediated regulation of myeloid cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2010;88:495–505. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1209822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhou R.P., Wu X.S., Xie Y.Y., Dai B.B., Hu W., Ge J.F., Chen F.H. Functions of interleukin-34 and its emerging association with rheumatoid arthritis. Immunology. 2016;149:362–373. doi: 10.1111/imm.12660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Burke S.J., Lu D., Sparer T.E., Masi T., Goff M.R., Karlstad M.D., Collier J.J. NF-kappaB and STAT1 control CXCL1 and CXCL2 gene transcription. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;306:E131–E149. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00347.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fan Y., Mao R., Yang J. NF-kappaB and STAT3 signaling pathways collaboratively link inflammation to cancer. Protein Cell. 2013;4:176–185. doi: 10.1007/s13238-013-2084-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yu Y., Yang D., Qiu L., Okamura H., Guo J., Haneji T. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha induces interleukin-34 expression through nuclear factorkappaB activation in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014;10:1371–1376. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Vakkila J., Demarco R.A., Lotze M.T. Coordinate NF-kappaB and STAT1 activation promotes development of myeloid type 1 dendritic cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 2008;67:260–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2007.02068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Grivennikov S.I., Karin M. Dangerous liaisons: STAT3 and NF-kappaB collaboration and crosstalk in cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2010;21:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kojima H., Sasaki T., Ishitani T., Iemura S., Zhao H., Kaneko S., Kunimoto H., Natsume T., Matsumoto K., Nakajima K. STAT3 regulates Nemo-like kinase by mediating its interaction with IL-6-stimulated TGFbeta-activated kinase 1 for STAT3 Ser-727 phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:4524–4529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500679102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ohkawara B., Shirakabe K., Hyodo-Miura J., Matsuo R., Ueno N., Matsumoto K., Shibuya H. Role of the TAK1-NLK-STAT3 pathway in TGF-beta-mediated mesoderm induction. Genes Dev. 2004;18:381–386. doi: 10.1101/gad.1166904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Huang F., Kao C.Y., Wachi S., Thai P., Ryu J., Wu R. Requirement for Both JAK-Mediated PI3K Signaling and ACT1/TRAF6/TAK1-Dependent NF-B Activation by IL-17A in Enhancing Cytokine Expression in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. J. Immunol. 2007;179:6504–6513. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu F., Pawliwec A., Feng Z., Yasruel Z., Lebrun J.J., Ali S. Prolactin/Jak2 directs apical/basal polarization and luminal linage maturation of mammary epithelial cells through regulation of the Erk1/2 pathway. Stem Cell Res. 2015;15:376–383. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suman P., Gupta S.K. STAT3 and ERK1/2 cross-talk in leukaemia inhibitory factor mediated trophoblastic JEG-3 cell invasion and expression of mucin 1 and Fos. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014;72:65–74. doi: 10.1111/aji.12248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Victoni T., Gleonnec F., Lanzetti M., Tenor H., Valenca S., Porto L.C., Lagente V., Boichot E. Roflumilast N-oxide prevents cytokine secretion induced by cigarette smoke combined with LPS through JAK/STAT and ERK1/2 inhibition in airway epithelial cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Truong A.D., Park B., Ban J., Hong Y.H. The novel chicken interleukin 26 protein is overexpressed in T cells and induces proinflammatory cytokines. Vet. Res. 2016;47:65. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0342-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reichelt P., Schwarz C., Donzeau M. Single step protocol to purify recombinant proteins with low endotoxin contents. Protein Expr. Purif. 2006;46:483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.09.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Klasing K.C., Peng R.K. Influence of cell sources, stimulating agents, and incubation conditions on release of interleukin-1 from chicken macrophages. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1987;11:385–394. doi: 10.1016/0145-305X(87)90082-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rocha E.M., Hollingdale M.R., Gwadz R., Krettli A.U. Exoerythrocytic development of Plasmodium gallinaceum sporozoites in a chicken fibroblast cell line and inhibition of the cell invasion by specific anti-sporozoite monoclonal antibodies. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 1993;40:64–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1993.tb04883.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Truong A.D., Hong Y., Hoang C.T., Lee J., Hong Y.H. Chicken IL-26 regulates immune responses through the JAK/STAT and NF-kappaB signaling pathways. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017;73:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Livak K.J., Schmittgen T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Truong A.D., Ban J., Park B., Hong Y.H., Lillehoj H.S. Characterization and functional analyses of a novel chicken CD8alpha variant X1 (CD8alpha1) J. Anim. Sci. 2016;94:2737–2751. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Truong A.D., Hoang C.T., Hong Y., Lee J., Lee K., Lillehoj H.S., Hong Y.H. Functional analyses of the interaction of chicken interleukin 23 subunit p19 with IL-12 subunit p40 to form the IL-23 complex. Mol. Immunol. 2017;92:54–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hoang C.T., Hong Y., Truong A.D., Lee J., Lee K., Hong Y.H. Molecular cloning of chicken interleukin-17B, which induces proinflammatory cytokines through activation of the NF-kappaB signaling pathway. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017;74:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2017.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yun C.H., Lillehoj H.S., Choi K.D. Chicken IFN-gamma monoclonal antibodies and their application in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2000;73:297–308. doi: 10.1016/S0165-2427(00)00146-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Yoo J., Chang H.H., Bae Y.H., Seong C.N., Choe N.H., Lillehoj H.S., Park J.H., Min W. Monoclonal antibodies reactive with chicken interleukin-17. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008;121:359–363. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hong Y.H., Lillehoj H.S., Lee S.H., Park M.S., Min W., Labresh J., Tompkins D., Baldwin C. Development and characterization of mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for chicken interleukin 18. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2010;138:144–148. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2010.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hong Y.H., Lillehoj H.S., Lee S.H., Park D., Lillehoj E.P. Molecular cloning and characterization of chicken lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor (LITAF) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006;30:919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2005.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES