Abstract
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt) is an obligate biotrophic fungus that causes wheat powdery mildew, which is a devastating disease in wheat. However, little is known about the pathogenesis of this fungus, and differences in the pathogenesis of the same pathogen at various resistance levels in hosts have not been determined. In the present study, leaf tissues of both Pm40-expressing hexaploid wheat line L658 and its Pm40-deficient sister line L958 were harvested at 0 (without inoculation), 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) with Bgt race 15 and then subjected to RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). In addition, we also observed changes in fungal growth morphology at the aforementioned time points. There was a high correlation between percentage of reads mapped to the Bgt reference genome and biomass of the fungus within the leaf tissue during the growth process. The percentage of mapped reads of Bgt in compatible interactions was significantly higher (at the p<0.05 level) than that of reads in incompatible interactions from 24 to 72 hpi. Further functional annotations indicated that expression levels of genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase, putative secreted effector proteins (PSEPs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs) were significantly up-regulated in compatible interactions compared with these levels in incompatible interactions, particularly at 72 hpi. Moreover, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis suggested that genes involved in the endocytosis pathway were also enriched in compatible interactions. Overall, genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase, PSEPs and HSPs possibly played crucial roles in successfully establishing the pathogenesis of compatible interactions during late stages of inoculation. The study results also indicated that endocytosis is likely to play a potential role in Bgt in establishing compatible interactions.
Introduction
Powdery mildew fungi (Ascomycetes, Erysiphales) infect more than 10,000 plant species [1], one of which is Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt), an obligate biotrophic fungus that grows and reproduces only on living wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), which is an economically important agricultural crop that is in high demand around the world [2]. Powdery mildew caused by Bgt has seriously reduced wheat production both in China and around the world [3–5]. To control wheat powdery mildew, 80 powdery mildew resistance (Pm) alleles have been identified at 53 gene loci in wheat and its relatives, most of which confer race-specific resistance [6,7]. In contrast, only one avirulence gene in Bgt, named AvrPm3a/f, is recognized by the Pm3a and Pm3f alleles and has been cloned [8], and an allele-unspecific pathogen-encoded suppressor of avirulence named SvrPm3a1/f1 also has been cloned [9]. Both AvrPm3a/f and SvrPm3a1/f1 have similar expression kinetics, with a peak at haustorium formation, and only the inactive suppressor and sufficient amounts of AVR protein can active the R gene [8,10]. Similarly, in Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (Bgh), which is the other forma specialis of Blumeria graminis, only two avirulence genes, Avra10 and Avrk1, have been cloned. Both genes are derived from non-LTR retrotransposons [11,12], and their limited homology at the DNA and protein level indicates that they arose from distantly related LINE families [13]. Comparatively, the pathogenesis of Bgt is more unclear than the resistance mechanism of wheat.
With the rapid development of sequencing technologies, whole-genome sequencing of wheat powdery mildew and barley powdery mildew has been completed, and much genomic information has become available [14,15]. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated that the Bgt genome was 180 Mb and contained more than 90% transposable element (TE) sequences [15]. This result indicated that many repetitive sequences in the Bgt genome led to its large size, which is four times larger than that of other fungal genomes [16–18]. Genome analysis of Bgt showed 602 genes encoding putative effector proteins [15]. Similarly, 491 genes encoding candidate secrete effector proteins (CSEPs) have been identified in the Bgh genome [14]. Most Bgt putative effector proteins have close homologs in Bgh, which suggests functional conservation between the two closely related pathogens [19]. Furthermore, most candidate effector proteins share a conserved Y/F/W×C-motif in the N-terminal downstream of the signal peptides but they are highly sequence diverse, which suggests that many different targets exist in their host plants [11]. In Bgt, the avirulence gene AvrPm3a/f and suppressor of avirulence gene SvrPm3a1/f1 are both typical CSEP genes [8,10]. However, in Bgh, the avirulence genes Avra10 and Avrk1 are largely distinct from CSEPs [11,12]. Although members of the CSEP family have been regarded as major determinants in pathogenesis and as good candidates for AVR proteins [10], only a few these candidate effectors have been verified functionally [20,21]. Other candidate effectors include Bgh effector candidates (BECs), most of which are encoded by CSEP genes [22]. Functional analysis of BECs indicated that some play a virulence role; e.g., the ribonuclease-like BEC1011 and BEC1054 (synonyms CSEP0264 and CSEP0064) are bona fide effectors that function within the plant cell [23]. In addition, BEC1054 may target several host proteins and thus may play a central role in barley powdery mildew virulence by acting at several levels [24]. The host-induced gene silencing of BEC1019, a metalloprotease-like protein, significantly reduces fungal colonization of barley epidermal cells, indicating that BEC1019 also plays a vital role in virulence [25].
Generally, candidate effector proteins and BECs have been suggested to be produced mostly during the formation of the haustorium, which is a specialized infection structure of Blumeria graminis [11, 23]. Classic studies have demonstrated that haustoria are composed of three parts: the haustorial body with filamentous lobes [26,27]; the extrahaustorial membrane (EHM), which separates the haustoria from the host cytoplasm; and the region between the EHM and haustorial body, called the extrahaustorial matrix (EHMx) [28,29]. The haustorial complex is believed to promote the uptake of carbohydrates and amino acids from a living host [26,30,18] and transfers of the effector proteins across the EHM to the host [11]. This finding indicated that powdery mildew haustoria are the most important regions for interacting with host cells, and CSEPs or BECs have been suggested to function mainly in haustoria.
In recent years, transcriptome sequencing has proven useful for gene prediction and annotation; this technique has permitted the elucidation of the temporal expression patterns of powdery mildew after infecting hosts. At the initial research of the powdery mildew pathogen transcriptome, Thomas et al. utilized expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis and serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) to study the transcriptome during Bgh pathogenesis and obtained approximately 60,000 tags isolated from ungerminated conidia, germinating conidia, and appressoria of Bgh [31,32]. Thereafter, cDNA microarrays of Bgh transcript profiles during the asexual development cycle demonstrated that glycolysis and lipid metabolism pathways are involved in mature appressoria formation, epidermis infection and fungal germination. In addition, appressoria formation and function are likely regulated by the transcripts clap1 and cap20, which encode a copper transporter and the CAP20 protein, respectively [33,34]. With the development of next-generation sequencing technologies, large-scale “-omics” techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics have been widely applied for the study of plant-powdery mildew interaction [35]. For instance, transcriptome analysis of Golovinomyces orontii haustoria has confirmed that transcripts involved in protein turnover, detoxification of reactive oxygen species and fungal pathogenesis are highly abundant in the haustorial EST contigs, while transcripts encoding transporter proteins for nutrient uptake are not highly abundant [36]. The comparative transcriptome of Bgh during early pathogenesis on barley and immunocompromised Arabidopsis revealed a conserved Bgh transcriptional program during pathogenesis compared with the natural host, barley, and genes encoding CSEPs were massively and consistently induced at high levels during haustoria formation in compatible interactions compared with incompatible interactions [37]. Previous transcriptome analysis of Bgt showed that candidate effector proteins genes were possibly involved in the host-pathogen interaction [15]. In a recent study, the transcriptome of Bgt showed that activation of the metabolism of diverse sugars, glycogen synthesis, energy production, and unsaturated fatty acid oxidation occurred during Bgt conidiation. A crosslink between H2O2 and Ca2+ signaling and involvement of some other regulators are associated with regulation of Bgt conidiation [38]. Proteomic studies of Bgh have focused on purified haustoria, haustoria in barley epidermis, conidia and secondary hyphae, and most proteins appear to be involved in metabolic pathways or biological energy production [39–42].
To determine which genes and pathways are involved in Bgt pathogenesis, the key stage of interaction between hosts and Bgt and the developmental stage of Bgt growth, we harvested leaf tissues at 0 (without inoculation), 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours post-inoculation (hpi) with Bgt race 15 from hexaploid wheat lines L658 carrying Pm40 and L958 lacking Pm40; these tissues were used to determine the gene expression changes in Bgt using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). To determine the differences in gene expression between compatible and incompatible interactions, we focused on genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase, putative secreted effector proteins (PSEPs) and heat shock proteins (HSPs). In addition, we also observed and recorded the morphological growth and fungal biomass of Bgt in compatible and incompatible interactions at various time points after infection.
Materials and methods
Plant material, inoculation and tissue harvest
The susceptible hexaploid wheat line L958 without Pm40 and the resistant sister line L658 carrying Pm40 were selected from F7 population that was derived from F3 plants from a cross between the susceptible line MY11 and the resistant line YU25 [43], and L658 and L958 were used for studying Bgt differential expression during compatible and incompatible interactions. The Bgt fungus used in this study was a single-spore pure monoculture from Bgt race 15 which was collected from Wenjiang, Chengdu, Sichuan Province (latitude N30° 40’ and longitude E103° 51’) in 2011, and the virulence spectrum showed that resistance genes Pm2, 3b, 3c, 3g, 4, 4b, 5a, 5b, 6, 7, 8, 11 displayed a susceptible response to race 15, and Pm1, 1a, 17, 21, 34, 35, 40, Pm1+2+9 remained effective. The Bgt fungus was maintained on susceptible wheat line CY20 through weekly transfer to new plants. L658 and L958 were cultivated in a light growth chamber (Microclima MC1750E, Snijders Scientific, Tilburg, Holland) with 16-h light/8-h dark at 18°C and 80% humidity. Seven-day-old seedlings of L658 and L958 were inoculated with shaking infected plants at densities of approximately 100–200 conidia per mm2. The first leaves which are the oldest leaves were collected randomly for total RNA extraction at five different time points (6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hpi), and there were three biological replicates per time point. At the same time, samples at 0 h (without inoculation) were also harvested and were employed as the control. Next, we collected 200 mg of fresh pure conidia of Bgt that were cultivated for 7 days on CY20 for RNA extraction. The remaining inoculated L658 and L958 seedlings were grown for 7 days to record disease development. Five-time points for sampling were chosen based on the life cycle stages of the wheat powdery mildew pathogen [44]. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C.
Cytological observation of wheat leaves after Bgt inoculation
Three leaves were collected for each time point as described. Fungal structures within the leaves were stained using a protein-specific dye as described by Wolf and Fric [45]. The samples were then examined and photographed using bright-field microscopy (Nikon ECLIPSE 80i, Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The histological assays were repeated three times for each time point and genotype. To determine pathogen biomass, length of germ tubes (LGT) and hyphal expansion radius (HYR) were measured using SPOT software (Diagnostic Instruments, MI, USA), and haustoria formation rates (HFRs) were manually counted.
RNA extraction, cDNA library construction and RNA sequencing
Total RNA was extracted at each time point from inoculated leaves containing fungi using the TRIzol reagent method (Invitrogen Life Technologies, CA, USA) with three biological replicates, and Bgt pure conidia RNA was extracted using the total RNA Kit E.Z.N.A. (Omega Bio-tek, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. RNA purity and concentration were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA). RNA quantity and quality were checked using the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Only the high-quality RNA sample (OD260/280≥1.8, OD260/230≥0.5, RIN≥6.5, 28S/18S≥1.0, >3ug) was used to construct the sequencing library. One portion of RNA was used for RNA-seq, and the remaining was used for further reliable analysis.
mRNA was purified from total RNA using poly-T oligo-attached magnetic beads. Then, fragmentation was carried out using divalent cations under elevated temperature in NEBNext First-Strand Synthesis Reaction Buffer (5X). Next, cDNA libraries were constructed using the NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, USA), and library fragments of approximately 500 bp were purified with the AMPure XP system (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Finally, these fragments were enriched by PCR amplification, the PCR products were purified (AMPure XP system), and library quality was assessed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system. The library preparations were sequenced using high-throughput sequencing on an Illumina HiSeq™ 2500 platform, and 150 paired-end reads were generated. The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive under accession number SRP117269.
Mapping clean reads to the reference genome and calculation of gene expression
High-quality reads were obtained by removing reads containing an adapter, reads containing poly-N and low-quality reads from raw data. These high-quality reads were then mapped to the reference genome of Bgt isolate 96224 [15]. Mapping was performed with TopHat2 software (version 2.0.7, Johns Hopkins University, MD, USA) [46] built on top of BOWTIE2 [47], allowing up to 2 base mismatches. Only the reads mapped to the reference genome of Bgt isolate 96224 were considered as Bgt-specific transcripts. To determine the gene expression level, the normalized expression levels FPKM (fragments per kilobase of transcript effective length per million fragments mapped to whole Bgt transcripts) were calculated by the Cufflinks software as previously described [48].
Detection and functional annotation of differentially expressed genes
The Bgt-L658 interaction at the different time points and the Bgt pure conidia were considered control treatments for comparison, and the differential gene expression between the Bgt-L658 interaction and the Bgt-L958 interaction at the corresponding various time points was measured using DESeq software [49]. The false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated by adjusting the p-value using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach, and the adjusted FDR<0.05 and |log2 (fold change) |≥1.5 were set as the conditions for differentially expressed genes (DEGs).
To clarify the function of DEGs, nucleotide sequences of the DEGs were aligned against the protein database Swiss-Prot database [50] and the NCBI non-redundant “NR” database by using BLASTX, and E-value<1e-5 was set as the threshold. Putative physiological and functional categories were assigned according to Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis, which was implemented using the TopGO package. To further predict metabolic pathways, KOBAS software was used to determine the statistical enrichment of DEGs in KEGG (the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways [51]. GO terms and KEGG pathways with p-values<0.05 were considered significantly enriched. The DEGs were also annotated in the COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins) database at the same time [52].
Reliable analysis through semi-quantitative RT-PCR and real-time qRT-PCR
To further demonstrate the reliability of the RNA-seq data, 5 genes were chosen randomly from the expressed genes for semi-quantitative RT-PCR and real-time qRT-PCR experiments. Transcript one-step gDNA removal and the cDNA synthesis super mix system were used for the cDNA synthesis of Bgt at each time point after interacting with L658 and L958 using oligo-dT primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed, and each 25 μL reaction mixture conntained 1 μL of cDNA. All reactions were run under identical conditions: 4 min at 94°C for pre-degeneration; 36 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 60°C, and 45 s at 72°C; and a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The primer sequences used for this detection are listed in Additional S1 Table. PCR products were visualized on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Quantification was performed on an Eppendorf real-time qRT-PCR detection system using Stratagene SYBR Green I (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China). The assays were performed with three technical replicates at each time point for L658 and L958 after infection with Bgt under the following conditions: 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 5 s at 94°C and 30 s at 60°C. The melting curve was set at 60°C to 95°C with a 0.5°C increase per step. Expression values relative to the Bgt reference gene elongation factor 1-α (GenBank: EPQ64622.1) were calculated using the ΔΔCt method [53].
Results
Differences in the infection processes and fungal biomass between compatible and incompatible interactions
We observed pathogen growth in the early stages based on light microscopy (Fig 1A and 1B). Although Bgt had similar growth phenotypes and similar development times, the fungal biomass differed between the two interactions. For example, the germ tube (Fig 1A and 1B) grew rapidly in both interactions at 12 hpi, but the LGT obviously differed between these two interactions (Table 1). We also observed initial haustoria formation in both interactions at 24 hpi, but the HFRs were significantly higher in compatible interactions than in incompatible interactions (Table 1). In contrast, hyphae proliferated on the leaf surface of L958, while the resistance response was observed in numerous cells of L658 leaves at 72 hpi (Fig 1A and 1B). At the same time, the HYRs of compatible interactions were significantly higher than those of incompatible interactions (Table 1). Finally, L958 exhibited a susceptible phenotype, with numerous conidia covering the leaves, while L658 had no obvious symptoms except for a few spots of chlorosis at 7 days post-inoculation (dpi) (Fig 1C and 1D).
Table 1. The average biomass of Bgt during L658 and L958 interactions for each time point of three independent biological replications.
Target | Time interval | L658 interaction | L958 interaction | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
LGTa (μm) | 6 h | 28.08±3.306 | 29.82±2.258 | 0.687 |
12 h | 46.71±0.337 | 37.89±2.391 | 0.064 | |
HARb (%) | 24 h | 9.93±1.011 | 41.5±3.291 | 0.001 |
HYRc (xm) | 48 h | 69.57±9.183 | 81.33±1.202 | 0.328 |
72 h | 120.78±29.990 | 261.12±18.228 | 0.016 |
a: The length of germ tubes, which represents the average length of primary germ tubes of total interaction sites
b: Haustoria formation rates, which represents the proportion of the sites where formation of haustoria in total interaction sites
c: Hyphal expansion radius, which represents half of the average of two perpendicular diameters of each colony.
Transcriptome data and the percentage of mapped reads of Bgt
A total of 2,360,250,800 high-quality reads were obtained after a quality check and data cleaning, and few Bgt-specific reads were detected in the control samples of either L958 or L658 at 0 h (without inoculation) (S2 Table). In addition, we mapped clean reads of each sample to the Bgt reference genome. However, the percentage of reads mapped to the Bgt reference genome was very low in all samples, and the largest percentage of mapped reads was only 0.28% in L958 at 72 hpi (Fig 1E, S2 Table). Interestingly, although the change tendencies of the percentage of mapped reads were similar between the two interactions within 6 hpi, the percentage of mapped reads of Bgt on L958 was significantly higher than that of Bgt on L658 at 24, 48 hpi, and the difference in the percentage of mapped reads between Bgt on L958 and Bgt on L658 continuously increased with Bgt growth so that the largest difference in the percentage of mapped reads between them occurred at 72 hpi (Fig 1E). In addition, the change tendency in the percentage of mapped reads differed between the two interactions from 6 to 24 hpi. In Bgt-L658 interaction, there was an obvious increase from 6 to 12 hpi and an obvious decrease from 12 to 24 hpi. In contrast, in Bgt-L958 interaction, there was an obvious decrease from 6 to 12 hpi but a significant increase from 12 to 24 hpi (Fig 1E).
Identification and annotation of DEGs
We identified 9039 transcripts, of which 6525 were annotated in the Bgt reference genome, and 290 of the annotated genes encoded PSEP. Further differential expression analysis of these transcripts showed that no DEGs were found in Bgt between the L658 and L958 interactions at 6 and 24 hpi. We also found only one DEG at both 12 and 48 hpi, encoding a plasma membrane H+-ATPase and a mannosidase GPI-anchored membrane protein, respectively (Table 2). We identified 260 DEGs for Bgt between the L658 and L958 samples at 72 hpi, including 224 annotated genes, and 208 (92.9%) were up-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction at 72 hpi (Table 2), of which 60 DEGs expressed specifically in L958 interaction (S3 Table). Similarly, 177 DEGs, including 120 annotated genes were found between the L958 interaction at 72 hpi and the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi (Table 2), of which 10 DEGs expressed specifically in Bgt conidia (S3 Table).
Table 2. DEG numbers and annotated DEGs.
L958 vs. L658a | All DEGs | Annotated DEGs | Up-regulated | Down-regulated |
---|---|---|---|---|
6h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12h | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
24h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
48h | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
72h | 260 | 224 | 208 (92.9%c) | 16 |
S72 vs. Bgtb | 177 | 120 | 11 | 109 (90.8%d) |
Numbers indicate the number of genes differentially expressed (FDR<0.05, |log2 fold change |≥1.5), which were compared in pairs at each time point. Significant expression differences occurred almost exclusively at 72 hpi.
a: Bgt interaction with L958 (compatible interaction) compared with Bgt interaction with L658 (incompatible interaction) at various time
b: Bgt interaction with L958 at 72 hpi compared with Bgt conidia at 7 dpi
c: Proportion of up-regulated DEGs with annotated DEGs
d: Proportion of down-regulated DEGs with annotated DEGs.
Further COG analysis was performed with the DEGs of L958 interaction compared with L658 interaction at 72 hpi, and the result showed that 71 (31.7%) DEGs belonged to translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; 18 (8.0%) belonged to posttranslational modification, protein turnover and chaperones; 13 (5.8%) belonged to energy production and conversion; 8 (3.6%) belonged to amino acid transport and metabolism; and 7 (3.1%) belonged to carbohydrate transport and metabolism (Fig 2). The overwhelming proportion of elements associated with and protein synthesis and turnover suggest that proteins abundant in compatible interaction at 72 hpi. The major metabolic pathways of DEGs in the L958 interaction at 72 hpi compared with those in Bgt conidia at 7 dpi were similar despite the lower numbers of DEGs (Fig 2). In addition, we found four different metabolic pathways for DEGs in the L958 interaction compared with those in the L658 interaction at 72 hpi: cytoskeleton; coenzyme transport and metabolism; intracellular trafficking, secretion and vesicular transport; and chromatin structure and dynamics. These metabolic pathways were absent from the DEGs in the L958 interaction at 72 hpi compared with those in Bgt conidia at 7 dpi (Fig 2).
To demonstrate the reliability, five randomly chosen DEGs (TID_seq1719, TID_seq197, TID_seq273, TID_seq1665, TID_seq3742) were employed to execute both semi-quantitative RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that there was no expression in the uninfected leaves of the L958 and L658 interactions at 0 h (S1 Fig) and that the highest expression in Bgt conidia occurred at 7 dpi, except for the expression of TID_seq197 (Fig 3). In addition, the differential expression of these five genes was detected in both interactions at all time points after infection (Fig 3). The relative expression of these genes in the L958 and L658 interactions was highly correlated with RNA-Seq FPKM values (S4 Table, Fig 4). All relationships between the relative expression values of the 5 DEGs detected by qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq FPKM were significant at p = 0.05; most relationships were significant at p = 0.01 in the compatible interaction (S4 Table). We also found that some relationships were not significant at p = 0.05 in the incompatible interaction (S4 Table), mainly due to the low expression of this gene as well as the large detected error in both qRT-PCR and RNA-seq (Fig 4).
Identification of pathogenic proteins and interesting DEGs
We identified 8 DEGs encoding PSEPs between the L658 and L958 interactions at 72 hpi, of which 7 genes were up-regulated and only one down-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction (Table 3). In addition, 4 out of the 8 DEGs carried the conserved N-terminal Y/F/W×C motif (Table 3). Similarly, there were also 7 DEGs encoding PSEPs between the L958 interaction at 72 hpi and the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi; of these DEGs, 6 were up-regulated and only one down-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi (Table 3). Additionally, 4 out of the 7 DEGs carried the conserved N-terminal Y/F/W×C motif (Table 3). Further analysis found that both the gene down-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction at 72 hpi (TID_seq6419) and that down-regulated in the L958 interaction at 72 hpi compared with the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi (TID_seq1719) lacked the conserved N-terminal Y/F/W×C motif (Table 3).
Table 3. Differentially expressed three types genes annotated in NR, KEGG and Swiss-port database.
Transcript ID | Accession No. in NCBI | Putative function | KEGG_pathway | S72 vs. R72d | S72 vs. Bgte | Motiff | Length of amino acidg | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEP (NRa) | TID_seq148 | EPQ67823.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (4.15) | up (6.10) | — | 206 |
TID_seq197 | EPQ67773.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (4.23) | up (5.61) | YxC | 263 | |
TID_seq2629 | EPQ65328.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (lnf) | up (7.76) | — | 143 | |
TID_seq6013 | EPQ61929.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (lnf) | up (12.07) | YxC | 110 | |
TID_seq1173 | EPQ66816.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (lnf) | — | FxC | 130 | |
TID_seq1300 | EPQ66693.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (5.50) | — | — | 168 | |
TID_seq4971 | EPQ63054.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | up (lnf) | — | YxC | 110 | |
TID_seq6419 | EPQ61518.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | down (-3.23) | — | — | 260 | |
TID_seq1719 | EPQ66269.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | — | down (-2.75) | — | 155 | |
TID_seq2965 | EPQ65025.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | — | up (8.64) | YxC | 111 | |
TID_seq4396 | EPQ63571.1 | putative secreted effector protein | — | — | up (10.50) | YxC | 137 | |
H+-ATPases (KEGGb) | TID_seq1665 | EPQ66305.1 | V-type H+-transporting ATPase 16 kDa proteolipid subunit | Oxidative phosphorylation; Phagosome | up (2.90) | — | — | 146 |
TID_seq5553 | EPQ62470.1 | V-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit A | Oxidative phosphorylation; Phagosome | up (4.21) | — | — | 609 | |
TID_seq2055 | EPQ65941.1 | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit alpha | Oxidative phosphorylation | up (3.49) | — | — | 558 | |
TID_seq3347 | EPQ64576.1 | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit beta | Oxidative phosphorylation | up (4.19) | — | — | 382 | |
TID_seq349 | EPQ67625.1 | F-type H+-transporting ATPase subunit c | Oxidative phosphorylation | up (3.62) | — | — | 157 | |
TID seq 6498 | EPQ61480.1 | H+-transporting ATPase | Oxidative phosphorylation | up (2.02) | — | — | 976 | |
HSPs (Swiss-portc) | TID_seq273 | EPQ67700.1 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein 2 | Spliceosome; Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum; Endocytosis | up (4.63) | — | — | 648 |
TID_seq1603 | EPQ66372.1 | Heat shock protein 90 | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum; Plant-pathogen interaction | up (4.59) | — | — | 701 | |
TID_seq2143 | EPQ65860.1 | Heat shock protein 78 | — | up (lnf) | — | — | 802 | |
TID_seq2513 | EPQ65459.1 | Heat shock protein hsp88 | — | up (4.83) | — | — | 709 | |
TID_seq2705 | EPQ65318.1 | 10 kDa heat shock protein | — | up (lnf) | — | — | 80 | |
TID_seq3365 | EPQ64594.1 | Heat shock protein 60 | RNA degradation | up (4.28) | — | — | 577 | |
TID_seq4183 | EPQ63849.1 | 30 kDa heat shock protein | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | up (lnf) | — | — | 207 | |
TID_seq643 | EPQ67331.1 | Heat shock protein sti1 homolog | — | up (6.16) | — | — | 559 | |
TID_seq787 | EPQ67191.1 | Heat shock protein sks2 | — | up (5.49) | — | — | 66 | |
TID_seq113 | EPQ67869.1 | 30 kDa heat shock protein | Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum | — | down (-2.10) | — | 205 |
a: Putative protein function predicted in NR database
b: Putative protein function predicted in KEGG database
c: Putative protein function predicted in Swiss-port database
d: The regulation of DEG in Bgt interaction with L958 compared with Bgt interaction with L658 at 72 hpi, and the numbers in parentheses represents Log2 fold change. “lnf” represents the Log2 fold change is infinity which means the DEG expressed specifically in L958 interaction at 72hpi
e: The regulation of DEG in Bgt interaction with L958 at 72 hpi compared with Bgt conidia at 7 dpi, and the numbers in parentheses represents Log2 fold change
f: The type of the conserved Y/F/W×C-motif in the N-terminal of predicted proteins
g: The length of predicted proteins (amino acids)
We also identified genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase as important and interesting DEGs for differentiating compatibility and incompatibility between pathogen and host. One down-regulated gene and six up-regulated genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase exhibited differential expression in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction at 12 and 72 hpi, respectively (S2 Fig).
Finally, we identified 9 DEGs encoding HSPs between the L958 and L658 interactions at 72 hpi; all nine genes were up-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction (Table 3). In addition, we also found another one DEG, which were different from the above 9 DEGs encoding HSPs between the L958 interaction at 72 hpi and the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi. Moreover, the expression levels of the gene were down-regulated in the L958 interaction at 72 hpi compared with the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi (Table 3).
Identification of important pathway-related compatibility and incompatibility
KEGG analysis showed that four DEGs were involved in the endocytosis pathway (S5 Table), and all four genes were up-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction at 72 hpi (S5 Table). Among these four DEGs, TID_seq1665 and TID_seq273 encoded H+-transporting ATPase and HSP70, respectively. We did not detect differences in expression between the L958 interaction at 72 hpi and the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi.
Discussion
Although several studies have investigated powdery mildew pathogens in both barley and Arabidopsis [33,34,24,20], fewer studies have investigated the Bgt pathogen in wheat [15, 38]. In present study, the different transcript expression patterns of Bgt during compatible and incompatible interactions and the relationships with fungal morphological growth have been determined.
In our study, the percentage of mapped reads of Bgt was very low in the two interactions at all time points (S2 Table). Previous studies also showed that the percentage of mapped reads of Bgt was low (only 0.6% in a mixed sample of samples harvested at 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hpi) [15]. This is a common phenomenon in the early gene expression profiles of other obligate biotrophic fungi [37,15], and in our study, it could be caused by the large hexaploid wheat transcript pool of wheat and small amount of Bgt biomass in the mixed samples (Tables 1 and S2).
Previous studies have demonstrated that changes in fungal morphology are highly associated with the temporal and spatial expression profiles of fungal transcripts [54,55]. In our study, the differential morphological growth in the two interactions was accompanied by large differences in the changes in the percentage of mapped reads. For example, the morphological differences in Bgt between compatible interaction and interactions were detected early at 12 hpi (Table 1), whereas different change tendencies of the percentage of mapped reads were detected at 6 hpi (Fig 1E). This result suggested that gene expression influencing the establishment of Bgt could occur within 12 hpi, and different gene expression changes from 6 hpi to 12 hpi could play crucial roles in regulating the establishment of compatible and incompatible interactions. In addition, the dramatic growth differences of Bgt at 72 hpi agreed well with the significantly differential expression at the transcriptome level between compatible and incompatible interactions (Fig 1A, 1B and 1E; Tables 1 and 2). Overall, comparing the changes between morphological growth and gene expression, we found that the differences in Bgt morphological growth were accompanied by differences in gene expression at the transcriptome level.
To determine which DEGs were interesting, we focused first on the genes encoding PSEPs. Previous studies have shown that in the Bgt genome, 602 putative effector genes (which account for 9.2% the total gene complement) may be involved in host-pathogen interactions [15], and most up-regulated DEGs in Bgh in compatible interactions compared with incompatible interactions at 24 hpi encoded CSEPs [37]. In our study, 290 genes which account for 4.4% the annotated genes encoding PSEPs. Moreover, 8 and 7 DEGs encoding PSEPs were identified between the L958 or L658 interaction at 72 hpi and between the L958 interaction at 72 hpi and the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi, respectively (Table 3). In addition, more than 87% of the genes up-regulated at 72 hpi in the L958 interaction compared with the Bgt conidia at 7 dpi encoded PSEPs (Table 3); this result implies that PSEPs play important roles in Bgt pathogenicity.
Previous studies also confirmed that genes of pathogens causing powdery mildew encoding secreted effectors have commonly induced expression profiles in various species [37,15]. Despite only a small proportion of these candidate effectors being verified functionally, some studies have demonstrated that secret effectors could contribute to powdery mildew virulence in early infection [37,24,20], and some secret effectors could also interact with host pathogenesis-related proteins or proteins related to defense and response to pathogens in the host, thereby weakening the resistance of the host to pathogens [56,24,15,21]. We further found that the genes encoding PSEPs were expressed only after infection, especially from 24 to 72 hpi (formation of the haustoria and hyphae), and most of these genes were not expressed initially in early infection (Figs 3, 4 and S2). Therefore, this result indicated that the genes encoding PSEPs were usually expressed non-constitutively and were expressed only by induction after infecting the host. In addition, Bgh candidate effectors expressed at different stages of barley infection have different functional roles [37,20,21]. In this study, we found that PSEP gene expression increased gradually after Bgt inoculation and peaked from 48 to 72 hpi (S2 Fig). At the same time, semi-quantitative RT-PCR and qRT-PCR results showed that genes encoding PSEPs had different profiles of temporal expression (Figs 3 and 4). Some genes, such as TID_seq1719, were induced very quickly in the early stages, usually within 24 hpi (Figs 3, 4 and S2), while other genes, such as TID_seq197, were induced in the late stages, usually at 48 hpi (Figs 3, 4 and S2). From this evidence, we could suggest that some PSEPs expressed in the early stage after pathogen infection are possible virulence factors that enhance fungal pathogenicity, that the other PSEPs expressed in later stages are more likely used to combat proteins related to defense and response to pathogens in the host and that genes encoding both kinds of PSEPs are usually up-regulated at various stages after infection and are favorable for the establishment of compatibility.
Generally, among Bgh CSEPs are two major types of effector families: one comprising short proteins (100–150 amino acids) with a high expression level in haustoria and one consisting of longer proteins (300–400 amino acids) with low levels in haustoria but with higher levels during penetration [22]. Most genes encoding secreted proteins are up-regulated during haustoria formation in Bgh [57]. Similarly, in our study, most PSEPs up-regulated at 72 hpi comprised short proteins (100–170 amino acids) (Table 3, Figs 3, 4 and S2). However, we found that one gene (TID_seq6419) encoding PSEP with long proteins (260 amino acids) was down-regulated in the L958 interaction compared with the L658 interaction at 72 hpi (Table 3) but had high expression levels at 6 hpi in the L958 interaction and at 12 hpi in the L658 interaction (S2 Fig). In addition, previous reports showed that most CSEPs have a conserved N-terminal Y/F/W×C motif [22]. In this study, most secrete effector proteins also had this motif, and all were up-regulated in compatible interactions. However, two PSEPs lacking the Y/F/W×C motif (TID_seq6419 and TID_seq1719) were down-regulated in compatible interactions (Table 3). This implied that Bgt PSEPs with different amino acid lengths and the presence or absence of Y/F/W×C motif possibly have different expression profiles at transcript levels similar to those found in Bgh and may have different functions at different infection stages.
Second, we would like to investigate to the genes encoding H+-ATPase because it is a popular view that plasma membrane H+-ATPase plays an important role in the interaction between pathogens and hosts [58,59]. In fact, various studies have found that genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase are up-regulated in Bgh and Magnaporthe oryzae during appressoria formation [34,60]. A specific proton pump in which H+-ATPase is highly involved is also abundant in Colletotrichum higginsianum during appressoria formation after infection [61]. In our study, the expression of DEGs encoding H+-transporting ATPase peaked at 6 hpi (formation of the appressoria) (S2 Fig). In addition, previous studies also showed that the expression of H+-ATPase is high during haustoria formation and decreases during the formation of penetration pegs [34,61,62]. We also found one down-regulated gene and five up-regulated genes encoding H+-transporting ATPase in the L958 interaction compared with L658 interaction at 12 hpi (formation of the penetration pegs) and 72 hpi (formation of the hyphae), respectively (Table 3). COG annotation showed that 15 DEGs were involved in the transport and metabolism of both amino acids and carbohydrates at 72 hpi (Fig 2), for which H+-ATPase may be needed for this process [27,18]. The differential regulation of H+-transporting ATPases at the transcriptional level at different developmental stages possibly responds to different requirements [61,63,64]. Overall, it is reasonable to assume that H+-transporting ATPase of Bgt may influence the formation of appressoria and penetration pegs for invading the host at early infection stages and driving the uptake of nutrition at later infection stages.
HSPs are also interesting for determining the mechanism of compatibility interactions. In Bgh, HSPs have been identified as the main proteins associated with fungal pathogenicity [37]. In our study, transcripts encoding HSPs were also massively induced at 72 hpi in the L958 interaction (Table 3, S2 Fig). Previous reports have indicated that the HSPs of Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Ustilago maydis are essential for intracellular homeostasis, morphogenesis, growth and stress adaptation, all of which are related to fungal pathogenicity and virulence [65,66]. Similarly, it is implied that some HSPs can enhance the capacity of pathogens to attack and that others can reduce the capacity of host defenses in Bgt.
We found that DEGs involved in endocytosis were up-regulated in compatible interactions compared with incompatible interactions after Bgt infection (S5 Table). Endocytosis is essential for the acquisition or removal of macromolecules and particles from the extracellular medium and for controlling intercellular communication, signal transduction, and cellular and organismal homeostasis in eukaryotic cells [67]. In previous studies, endocytosis internalized pathogenicity factors, such as toxic proteins, into wheat [68] and mediated the uptake of ferrichrome in Fusarium graminearum [69]. In addition, Bgh multivesicular body (MVB)-mediated endocytosis acted as an intermediate stage in the delivery of fungal virulence factors to the host cell and potentially activated elicitor receptors from the plant surface [70,71]. In our study, four DEGs were involved in the endocytosis pathway in the compatible interactions (S5 Table); the cellular components in which these DEGs function are the extracellular region, fungal-type vacuoles and actin filament bundles, which are mainly responsible for vesicle-mediated transport (S5 Table). This result indicated the possibility of exchange between the haustoria and the plant via endocytosis.
Conclusions
The percentage of reads mapped to the Bgt reference genome was very low for all time points of compatible and incompatible interactions, but there were high correlations with fungal biomass. These results potentially suggest that the differences in morphological growth were accompanied by differences in gene expression at the transcriptome level. At early infection stages, H+-transporting ATPase may act as the key for entering hosts, which involves first breaking through the host defenses in compatible interactions while functioning similarly to incompatible interactions without the key to enter the host. After Bgt entered the host, it formed haustoria. The high expression of PSEPs and HSPs may indicate that most possibly acted as virulence factors to enhance pathogenicity at this stage. However, the insufficient accumulation of PSEPs and HSPs in incompatible interactions resulted in a weak attack on the host. At later infection stages, PSEPs and HSPs were possibly used to suppress the host defense response. In addition, H+-transporting ATPase may be involved in nutrient uptake at later infection stages in compatible interaction. Overall, H+-transporting ATPase, PSEPs and HSPs may play a vital role in successfully establishing pathogenesis among compatible interactions. Furthermore, endocytosis is likely an important pathway for exchanging substances as the pathogen interacts with the host.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Biomarker Technology Co, Ltd. (Beijing, China), for critically reviewing a draft of this paper.
Data Availability
The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive under accession number SRP117269.
Funding Statement
The financial support of the Science and Technology Planning Project of Sichuan Province of China (2016NYZ0053-4) had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The responsible person of the Science and Technology Planning Project of Sichuan Province of China 2016NYZ0053-4; National Natural Science Foundation of China 31571661; Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province of China 2017JY0012; Specific Foundation of Agronomy nyhyzx3-15 is Min Zhang. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Takamatsu S. Phylogeny and evolution of the powdery mildew fungi (Erysiphales, Ascomycota) inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycoscience. 2004; 45: 147–157. doi: 10.1007/S10267-003-0159-3 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bruinsma J. “The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water, and crop yields need to increase by 2050?” in Proceedings of the FAO Expert Meeting on ‘How to Feed the World in 2050, FAO, Rome, Italy, June 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.001 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Conner R L, Kuzyk A D, Su H. Impact of powdery mildew on the yield of soft white spring wheat cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2003; 83: 725–728. doi: 10.4141/P03-043 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Griffey C A. Effectiveness of adult-plant resistance in reducing grain yield loss to powdery mildew in winter wheat. Plant Dis. 1993; 77: 618–622. doi: 10.1094/PD-77-0618 [Google Scholar]
- 5.Leath S, Bowen K L. Effects of powdery mildew, triadimenol seed treatment, and triadimefon foliar sprays on yield of winter wheat in North Carolina. Phytopathology. 1989; 79: 152–155. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-79-152 [Google Scholar]
- 6.Andrew T, Wiersma J A, Pulman L K, Cowger C, Olson E L. Identification of Pm58 from Aegilops tauschii. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; (1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2874-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Liu W, Koo D-H, Xia Q, Li C, Bai F, Song Y, et al. Homoeologous recombination-based transfer and molecular cytogenetic mapping of powdery mildew-resistant gene Pm57 from Aegilops searsii into wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2017; 130:841–848. doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2855-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bourras S, McNally K.E, Ben-David R, Parlange F, Roffler S, Praz C R, et al. Multiple avirulence loci and allele-specific effector recognition control the Pm3 race-specific resistance of wheat to powdery mildew. Plant Cell. 2015; 27: 2991–3012. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Parlange F, Roffler S, Menardo F, Ben-David R, Bourras S, McNally K E, et al. Genetic and molecular characterization of a locus involved in avirulence of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici on wheat Pm3 resistance alleles. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2015; 82: 181–192. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bourras S, McNally K E, Müller M C, Wicker T, Keller B. Avirulence genes in cereal powdery mildews: the gene-for-gene hypothesis 2.0. Front. Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 241 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Godfrey D, Böhlenius H, Pedersen C, Zhang Z, Emmersen J, Thordal-Christensen H. Powdery mildew fungal effector candidates share N-terminal Y/F/WxC-motif. BMC Genomics. 2010; 11: 317 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ridout C J, Skamnioti P, Porritt O, Sacristan S, Jones J D, Brown J K M. Multiple avirulence paralogues in cereal powdery mildew fungi may contribute to parasite fitness and defeat of plant resistance. Plant Cell. 2006; 18: 2402–2414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.043307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Amselem J, Vigouroux M, Oberhaensli S, Brown J K M, Bindschedler L V, Skamnioti P, et al. Evolution of the EKA family of powdery mildew avirulence-effector genes from the ORF1 of a LINE retrotransposon. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 917 doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2185-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Spanu P D, Abbott J C, Amselem J, Burgis T A, Soanes D M, Stüber K, et al. Genome expansion and gene loss in powdery mildew fungi reveal tradeoffs in extreme parasitism. Science. 2010; 330: 1543–1546. doi: 10.1126/science.1194573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wicker T, Oberhaensli S, Parlange F, Buchmann J P, Shatalina M, Roffler S, et al. The wheat powdery mildew genome shows the unique evolution of an obligate biotroph. Nat. Genet. 2013; 45: 1092–1096. doi: 10.1038/ng.2704 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gregory T R, Nicol J A, Tamm H, Kullman B, Kullman K, Leitch I J, et al. Eukaryotic genome size databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: D332–D338. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parlange F, Oberhaensli S, Breen J, Platzer M, Taudien S, Simková H, et al. A major invasion of transposable elements accounts for the large size of the Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici genome. Funct. Integr. Genomics. 2011; 11: 671–677. doi: 10.1007/s10142-011-0240-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Voegele R T, Mendgen K. Rust haustoria: nutrient uptake and beyond. New Phytol. 2003; 159: 93–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00761.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rajaraman J, Douchkov D, Hensel G, Stefanato F L, Gordon A, Ereful N, et al. An LRR/malectin receptor-like kinase mediates resistance to non-adapted and adapted powdery mildew fungi in barley and wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 1836 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schmidt S M, Kuhn H, Micali C, Liller C, Kwaaitaal M, Panstruga R. Interaction of a Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei effector candidate with a barley ARF-GAP suggests that host vesicle trafficking is a fungal pathogenicity target. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2014; 15: 535–549. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhang W J, Pedersen C, Kwaaitaal M, Gregersen P L, Mørch S M, Hanisch S, et al. Interaction of barley powdery mildew effector candidate CSEP0055 with the defence protein PR17c. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012; 13: 1110–1119. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00820.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pedersen C, Ver Loren van Themaat E, McGuffin L J, Abbott J C, Burgis T A, Barton G, et al. Structure and evolution of barley powdery mildew effector candidates. BMC Genomics. 2012; 13: 694 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pliego C, Nowara D, Bonciani G, Gheorghe D M, Xu R, Surana P, et al. Host-induced gene silencing in barley powdery mildew reveals a class of ribonuclease-like effectors. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2013; 26: 633–642. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-13-0005-R [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pennington H G, Gheorghe D M, Damerum A, Pliego C, Spanu P D, Cramer R, et al. Interactions between the powdery mildew effector BEC1054 and barley proteins identify candidate host targets. J. Proteome Res. 2016; 15: 826–839. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00732 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Whigham E, Qi S, Mistry D, Surana P, Xu R, Fuerst G, et al. Broadly conserved fungal effector BEC1019 suppresses host cell death and enhances pathogen virulence in powdery mildew of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2015; 28: 968–983. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-15-0027-FI [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gil F, Gay J L. Ultrastructural and physiological properties of the host interfacial components of haustoria of Erysiphe pisi in vivo and in vitro. Physiol. Plant Pathol. 1977; 10: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(77)90002-9 [Google Scholar]
- 27.O'Connell R J, Panstruga R. Tête à tête inside a plant cell: establishing compatibility between plants and biotrophic fungi and oomycetes. New Phytol. 2006; 171: 699–718. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01829.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bélanger R R, Benhamou N, Menzies J G. Cytological evidence of an active role of silicon in wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici). Phytopathology. 2003; 93: 402–412. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.4.402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bushnell W R. Physiology of fungal haustoria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1972; 10: 151–176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.10.090172.001055 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hahn M, Mendgen K. Characterization of in planta-induced rust genes isolated from a haustorium-specific cDNA library. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1997; 10: 427–437. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1997.10.4.427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomas S W, Glaring M A, Rasmussen S W, Kinane J T, Oliver R P. Transcript profiling in the barley mildew pathogen Blumeria graminis by serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2002; 15: 847–856. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2002.15.8.847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thomas S W, Rasmussen S W, Glaring M A, Rouster J A, Christiansen S K, Oliver R P. Gene identification in the obligate fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis by expressed sequence tag analysis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2001; 33: 195–211. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.2001.1281 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Both M, Csukai M, Stumpf M P, Spanu P D. Gene expression profiles of Blumeria graminis indicate dynamic changes to primary metabolism during development of an obligate biotrophic pathogen. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 2107–2122. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.032631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Both M, Eckert S E, Csukai M, Müller E, Dimopoulos G, Spanu P D. Transcript profiles of Blumeria graminis development during infection reveal a cluster of genes that are potential virulence determinants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005; 18: 125–133. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0125 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bindschedler L V, Panstruga R, Spanu P D. Mildew-omics: how global analyses aid the understanding of life and evolution of powdery mildews. Front. Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 123 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weßling R, Schmidt S M, Micali C O, Knaust F, Reinhardt R, Neumann U, et al. Transcriptome analysis of enriched Golovinomyces orontii haustoria by deep 454 pyrosequencing. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012; 49: 470–482. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hacquard S, Kracher B, Maekawa T, Vernaldi S, Schulze-Lefert P, Ver Loren van Themaat E. Mosaic genome structure of the barley powdery mildew pathogen and conservation of transcriptional programs in divergent hosts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013; 110: E2219–E2228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1306807110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zeng F S, Menardo F, Xue M F, Zhang X J, Gong S J, Yang L J, et al. Transcriptome analyses shed new insights into primary metabolism and regulation of Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici during conidiation. Front. Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 1146 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bindschedler L V, Burgis T A, Mills D J S, Ho J T C, Cramer R, Spanu P D. In planta proteomics and proteogenomics of the biotrophic barley fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2009; 8: 2368–2381. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900188-MCP200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Bindschedler L V, McGuffin L J, Burgis T A, Spanu P D, Cramer R. Proteogenomics and in silico structural and functional annotation of the barley powdery mildew Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. Methods. 2011; 54: 432–441. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Godfrey D, Zhang Z, Saalbach G, Thordal-Christensen H. A proteomics study of barley powdery mildew haustoria. Proteomics. 2009; 9: 3222–3232. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200800645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Noir S, Colby T, Harzen A, Schmidt J, Panstruga R. A proteomic analysis of powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis. f. sp. hordei) conidiospores. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2009; 10: 223–236. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00524.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu Z, Xu M, Xiang Z, Li X, Chen W, Luo P. Registration of the novel wheat lines L658, L693, L696, and L699, with resistance to Fusarium head blight, stripe rust, and powdery mildew. J. Plant Regist. 2015; 9: 121–124. doi: 10.3198/jpr2014.01.0003crg [Google Scholar]
- 44.Spanu P D. The genomes of the cereal powdery mildew fungi, Blumeria graminis, in: Dean R.A, Lichens-Park A, Kole C. (Eds.), Genomics of Plant-Associated Fungi: Monocot Pathogens. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 2014: 161–175. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44053-7_7 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Wolf G, Fric F. A rapid staining method for Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei in and on whole barley leaves with a protein-specific dye. Phytopathology. 1981; 71: 596–598. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-71-596 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg S L. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biology. 2013; 14: R36 doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-4-r36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Langmead B, Salzberg S L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012; 9: 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Trapnell C, Williams B A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren M J, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010; 28: 511–515. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11: R106 doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu C H, Barker W C, Boeckmann B, Ferro S, et al. UniProt: the universal protein KnowledgeBase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004; 32: D115–DD119. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mao X, Cai T, Olyarchuk J G, Wei L. Automated genome annotation and pathway identification using the KEGG Orthology (KO) as a controlled vocabulary. Bioinformatics. 2005; 21: 3787–3793. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti430 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tatusov R L, Galperin M Y, Natale D A, Koonin E V. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28: 33–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pfaffl M W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT- PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: e45 doi: 10.1093/nar/29.9.e45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Duplessis S, Courty P E, Tagu D, Martin F. Transcript patterns associated with ectomycorrhiza development in Eucalyptus globulus and Pisolithus microcarpus. New Phytol. 2005; 165: 599–611. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01248.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Duplessis S, Hacquard S, Delaruelle C, Tisserant E, Frey P, Martin F, et al. Melampsora larici-populina transcript profiling during germination and timecourse infection of poplar leaves reveals dynamic expression patterns associated with virulence and biotrophy. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011; 24: 808–818. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-11-0006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ahmed A A, Pedersen C, Thordal-Christensen H. The barley powdery mildew effector candidates CSEP0081 and CSEP0254 promote fungal infection success. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0157586 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157586 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Aguilar G B, Pedersen C, Thordal-Christensen H. Identification of eight effector candidate genes involved in early aggressiveness of the barley powdery mildew fungus. Plant Pathol. 2016; 65: 953–958. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12476 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Panstruga R. Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003; 6: 320–326. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00043-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Schulze-Lefert P, Panstruga R. Establishment of biotrophy by parasitic fungi and reprogramming of host cells for disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2003; 41: 641–667. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.061002.083300 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Franck W L, Gokce E, Oh Y, Muddiman D C, Dean R A. Temporal analysis of the Magnaporthe Oryzae proteome during conidial germination and cyclic AMP (cAMP)-mediated appressorium formation. Mol. Cell Proteomics. 2013; 12: 2249–2265. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M112.025874 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Korn M, Schmidpeter J, Dahl M, Müller S, Voll L M, Koch C. A genetic screen for pathogenicity genes in the hemibiotrophic fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum identifies the plasma membrane proton pump Pma2 required for host penetration. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0125960 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Struck C, Hahn M, Mendgen K. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase activity in spores, germ tubes, and haustoria of the rust fungus Uromyces viciae-fabae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1996; 20: 30–35. doi: 10.1006/fgbi.1996.0006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Requena N, Breuninger M, Franken P, Ocón A. Symbiotic status, phosphate, and sucrose regulate the expression of two plasma membrane H+-ATPase genes from the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Plant Physiol. 2003; 132: 1540–1549. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.019042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Struck C, Siebels C, Rommel O, Wernitz M, Hahn M. The plasma membrane H (+)-ATPase from the biotrophic rust fungus Uromyces Fabae: molecular characterization of the gene (PMA1) and functional expression of the enzyme in yeast. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1998; 11: 458–465. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.6.458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ghosh A. Small heat shock proteins (HSP12, HSP20 and HSP30) play a role in Ustilago maydis pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014; 361: 17–24. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lamoth F, Juvvadi P R, Steinbach W J. Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) in fungal growth and pathogenesis. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2014; 8: 296–301. doi: 10.1007/s12281-014-0195-9 [Google Scholar]
- 67.Conner S D, Schmid S L. Regulated portals of entry into the cell. Nature. 2003; 422: 37–44. doi: 10.1038/nature01451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Manning V A, Ciuffetti L M. Localization of Ptr ToxA produced by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis reveals protein import into wheat mesophyll cells. Plant Cell. 2005; 17: 3203–3212. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kim J H, Kim H W, Heo D H, Chang M, Baek I J, Yun C W. FgEnd1 is a putative component of the endocytic machinery and mediates ferrichrome uptake in F. graminearum. Curr. Genet. 2009; 55: 593–600. doi: 10.1007/s00294-009-0272-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.An Q, Hückelhoven R, Kogel K H, van Bel A J. Multivesicular bodies participate in a cell wall-associated defence response in barley leaves attacked by the pathogenic powdery mildew fungus. Cell. Microbiol. 2006; 8: 1009–1019. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2006.00683.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Micali C O, Neumann U, Grunewald D, Panstruga R, O’Connell R. Biogenesis of a specialized plant-fungal interface during host cell internalization of Golovinomyces orontii haustoria. Cell. Microbiol. 2011; 13: 210–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01530.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data have been deposited in the NCBI sequence read archive under accession number SRP117269.