Draft genomes of three Salmonella enterica 4,[5],12:i:− (STi) strains isolated from human infections were obtained using Illumina sequencing. They were negative for the fljBA operon but positive for hin, and k-mer analyses revealed their identity as S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− 08-1736 and S.
ABSTRACT
Draft genomes of three Salmonella enterica 4,[5],12:i:− (STi) strains isolated from human infections were obtained using Illumina sequencing. They were negative for the fljBA operon but positive for hin, and k-mer analyses revealed their identity as S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− 08-1736 and S. Typhimurium. A draft S. Typhimurium sequence is described for comparison.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Salmonella enterica, an important human and animal pathogen (1, 2), is often associated with antibiotic resistance (3). This species is classified into different serotypes according to its somatic, flagellar, and, when expressed, capsular antigens (4). It is classified as either typhoid Salmonella (TS) or nontyphoid Salmonella (NTS) based on the serovar and host specificity. S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium (antigenic formula S. enterica I 4,[5],12:i:1,2) is among the most frequently identified NTS serovars isolated from human infections (2). Characteristics of this serovar include the nonconcomitant expression of two flagellar antigens (flagellar phases I and II), encoded by the fliC and fljB genes, respectively (5). Expression of fliC is negatively regulated by the fljA gene product, which forms an operon with fljB (6–8). The promoter of the fljBA operon extends into the hin sequence, a DNA fragment that is able to invert its orientation. Therefore, the type of flagellar antigen expressed is governed by the orientation of hin (5). Since the last century, S. Typhimurium variants unable to express flagellar phase II antigen have been isolated at an increased rate, becoming emergent an S. enterica serotype (9). S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− originated from S. Typhimurium through the deletion of the fljBA operon. Different clones are distinguished based on the molecular events responsible for the fljBA deletion (9). Here, we describe the draft genome of three strains of S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− (607STi, 633STi, and 691STi) and one of S. Typhimurium (662ST), all isolated in Brazil from human infections. Genomic DNA was prepared using the Wizard R genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel. Library preparation was performed using the Nextera paired-end sample preparation kit and TruSeq DNA PCR-free LT sample prep kit and processed in a HiSeq 2500 system (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Genome assembly was performed with Velvet (10) and annotation with RAST (11).
The number of contigs was 30 or 36, and the mean scaffold length was 134,767 to 163,767 bp. The GC content of all strains was 52.2%. Bacterial typing was performed with MLST 1.7, a platform for multilocus sequence typing (MLST) from assembled genomes (12). All strains were typed as sequence type 19 (ST-19), although the S. Typhimurium strain did not match perfectly for the thra locus due to a 1-base substitution. The ST-19 type is common for S. Typhimurium.
The prediction of prokaryotic species by k-mer genomic comparisons using KmerFinder 2.0 (13) indicated high scores for S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− strain 08-1736, a 4,[5],12:i:− strain, and other S. Typhimurium strains. Scores for other S. enterica serovars were lower. BLAST analyses indicated an absence of the fljBA operon in the S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− strains, though the hin sequence was present. The S. Typhimurium strain was positive for both sequences.
In conclusion, the three sequenced 4,[5],12:i:− strains presented high identity to S. enterica 4,[5],12:i:− strain 08-1736 and S. Typhimurium. Further analyses are under way to characterize this S. Typhimurium variant serovar in Brazil.
Accession number(s).
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. QAWG00000000, QAWH00000000, QAWI00000000, and QAWJ00000000. The versions described in this paper are the first versions, QAWG01000000, QAWH01000000, QAWI01000000, and QAWJ01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP 2003/00501-8). A.I.L.S. was a fellow of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnológico (CNPq 142048/2003-8). M.B. is a fellow of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 309800/2015-3).
Footnotes
Citation Sales AIL, Milanez GP, Nascimento LC, do Carmo CP, da Costa FLP, Pereira GAG, Martinez R, Brocchi M. 2018. Draft genome sequences of three Salmonella enterica serovar 4,[5],12:i:− strains and one S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain, isolated in Brazil. Genome Announc 6:e00488-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00488-18.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andrews-Polymenis HL, Bäumler AJ, McCormick BA, Fang FC. 2010. Taming the elephant: Salmonella biology, pathogenesis, and prevention. Infect Immun 78:2356–2369. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00096-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Crump JA, Sjölund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. 2015. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, laboratory diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance, and antimicrobial management of invasive Salmonella infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 28:901–937. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fernandes SA, Camargo CH, Francisco GR, Bueno MFC, Garcia DO, Doi Y, Casas MRT. 2017. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases CTX-M-8 and CTX-M-2-producing Salmonella serotypes from clinical and nonhuman isolates in Brazil. Microb Drug Resist 23:580–589. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2016.0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Agbaje M, Begum RH, Oyekunle MA, Ojo OE, Adenubi OT. 2011. Evolution of Salmonella nomenclature: a critical note. Folia Microbiol 56:497–503. doi: 10.1007/s12223-011-0075-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.McQuiston JR, Fields PI, Tauxe RV, Logsdon JM Jr. 2008. Do Salmonella carry spare tyres? Trends Microbiol 16:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bonifield HR, Hughes KT. 2003. Flagellar phase variation in Salmonella enterica is mediated by a posttranscriptional control mechanism. J Bacteriol 185:3567–3574. doi: 10.1128/JB.185.12.3567-3574.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aldridge P, Gnerer J, Karlinsey JE, Hughes KT. 2006. Transcriptional and translational control of the Salmonella fliC gene. J Bacteriol 188:4487–4496. doi: 10.1128/JB.00094-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yamamoto S, Kutsukake K. 2006. FljA-mediated posttranscriptional control of phase 1 flagellin expression in flagellar phase variation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 188:958–967. doi: 10.1128/JB.188.3.958-967.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Switt AIM, Soyer Y, Warnick LD, Wiedmann M. 2009. Emergence, distribution, and molecular and phenotypic characteristics of Salmonella enterica serotype 4,5,12:i:−. Foodborne Pathog Dis 6:407–415. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2008.0213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zerbino DR, Birney E. 2008. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 18:821–829. doi: 10.1101/gr.074492.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M, Vonstein V, Wattam AR, Xia F, Stevens R. 2014. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42:D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Rasmussen S, Friis C, Hasman H, Marvig RL, Jelsbak L, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Ussery DW, Aarestrup FM, Lund O. 2012. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Larsen MV, Cosentino S, Lukjancenko O, Saputra D, Rasmussen S, Hasman H, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Aarestrup FM, Ussery DW, Lund O. 2014. Benchmarking of methods for genomic taxonomy. J Clin Microbiol 52:1529–1539. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02981-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]