Abstract
HIV-1 nucleocapsid (NCp7) is a two Cys2HisCys zinc knuckle (N-Zn and C-Zn) protein that plays a key role in viral replication. NCp7 conformational dynamics is characterized by NMR relaxation dispersion and chemical exchange saturation transfer measurements. While the N-Zn knuckle is conformationally stable, the C-Zn knuckle interconverts on the millisecond timescale between the major state, in which the zinc is coordinated by three cysteines and a histidine, and two folded minor species (with populations around 1%) in which one of the coordination bonds (Cys413-Sγ-Zn or His421-Nε2-Zn) is hydrolyzed. These findings explain why antiretroviral thioesters specifically disrupt the C-Zn knuckle by initial acylation of Cys413, and show that transient, sparsely-populated (“dark”), excited states of proteins can present effective targets for rational drug design.
Keywords: antiretrovirals, conformational exchange, HIV-1 nucleocapsid, relaxation dispersion, zinc
HIV-1 nucleocapsid (NCp7) plays a central role in the viral replication cycle, including RNA packaging, viral assembly and release, integration, and reverse transcription.[1] NCp7 contains two zinc knuckles of the Cys-X2-Cys-X4-His-X4-Cys variety with 55% sequence identity between them (Figure 1A), and essentially identical three-dimensional structures.[2] NCp7 is conserved in all viral strains and is therefore a potential target for next-generation anti-HIV therapy.[3] Inhibition of NCp7 results in the production of immature, non-infectious virions that are unable to infect the host.[3] Mercaptobenzamide thioesters have been shown to specifically target the C-terminal zinc (C-Zn) knuckle of NCp7[4] by initial acylation of Cys413,[5] but the reason for the susceptibility of the C-Zn knuckle rather than the N-terminal (N-Zn) one is not clear. Mercaptobenzamide thioesters display low cellular toxicity and inhibit viral activity at concentrations less than 50 nM, suggesting that they may provide a useful avenue for anti-HIV-1 drug design.[6]
Figure 1.
Mercaptobenzamide thioesters specifically target the C-Zn knuckle of NCp7. A) HIV-1 NCp7. Numbering is based on the Gag polyprotein precursor from strain HXB2. B) Three regions of the 1H-15N correlation spectrum of 50 μM NCp7 alone (green), and 3 (red) and 6 hours (blue) after addition of a 20-fold molar excess of mercaptobenzamide-1 at 35°C and pH 6.5. Cross-peaks of the C-Zn are encircled and labeled in black, while those of the N-Zn knuckle are labeled in gray. The chemical structure of S-(2-((3-amino-3-oxopropyl)-carbamoyl)phenyl)pent-4-ynethioate (referred to as mercaptobenzamide-1) is shown as an inset. C) Time course of the cumulative normalized cross-peak heights and volumes for the N-Zn (blue, residues 390–405) and C-Zn (red, residues 413–428) knuckles following addition of mercaptobenzamide-1.
NCp7 is expressed as part of the Gag polyprotein and subsequently released during retroviral maturation by proteolytic cleavage. During the course of our previous work on the kinetics of the interactions of HIV-1 protease with Gag by relaxation-based NMR methods,[7] including Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) dispersion[8] and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST),[9] we noticed that the C-Zn knuckle undergoes exchange dynamics independent of the presence of protease. Here we investigate in detail the conformational dynamics within the C-Zn knuckle of NCp7 by 15N-CPMG and 15N- and 13C′-CEST experiments.
Figure 1B shows 1H–15N correlation spectra of NCp7 before and after addition of a 20-fold molar excess of mercaptobenzamide-1, a representative of the mercaptobenzamide thioester class of NCp7 inhibitors. The corresponding time courses of the normalized cumulative cross-peak heights and volumes for the N-Zn and C-Zn knuckles are shown in Figure 1C. The intensities of cross-peaks arising from the C-Zn knuckle are reduced by over 50% after 3 h. After 6 h, almost no cross-peaks are observed for the C-Zn knuckle, whereas those of the N-Zn knuckle are still present. Only after about 9 hours are the cross-peak intensities for the N-Zn knuckle significantly reduced, and at 12 h only a few weak cross-peaks at positions characteristic of random coil remain visible (Supporting Information, Figure S1). As the time courses of the normalized cross-peak heights and volumes are superimposable (Figure 1C), the reduction in cross-peak intensities cannot be attributed to an intermediate exchange process involving the folded state, but rather to the formation of large amorphous aggregates, seen by negative staining electron microscopy (Supporting Information, Figure S2), driven by the ejection of zinc from the coordination site and concomitant unfolding of the C-Zn knuckle triggered by the acylation of Cys413, followed by additional acylations at other sites.[5,6b] Note that intermediate exchange would result in line broadening leading to a reduction in cross-peak heights while leaving the corresponding volumes unaltered[8].
CPMG relaxation dispersion and CEST experiments probe exchange between a major NMR visible state and invisible, sparsely-populated states (as low as about 0.5%), characterized by different chemical shifts, on time scales ranging from about 0.1 to about 10 ms[8] and from about 5 to about 50 ms, respectively.[9] In relaxation dispersion experiments, chemical exchange line-broadening is progressively suppressed by increasingly strong CPMG field strengths. In CEST, the application of a weak radiofrequency (RF) field at the resonance of a minor invisible state(s) produces a loss of intensity at the resonance frequency of the major visible species resulting in a characteristic pair of intensity dips providing the exchanging states have significantly different chemical shifts. Quantitative analysis (best-fitting) of CPMG and/or CEST profiles via propagation of the Bloch–McConnell equations[10] yields the kinetic rate constants for the exchange process(es) and the chemical shifts of the invisible minor state(s).
Representative 15N-CPMG relaxation dispersion profiles are shown in Figure 2A. All residues within the C-Zn knuckle (411–428) exhibit significant dispersions (Supporting Information, Table S1). In contrast, the dispersion profiles for all residues of the N-Zn knuckle are flat (insets, Figure 2A). In favorable cases (when the chemical shift differences between the major and minor states, Δω, are sufficiently large), 15N-and 13C′-CEST profiles of C-Zn residues show characteristic second dips in intensity at the resonance frequencies of the minor species (Figure 2B), indicating that the timescale of exchange is sufficiently slow to be accessible to both CPMG-based and exchange saturation transfer techniques (τex ≈ 2–10 ms).
Figure 2.
CPMG relaxation dispersion and CEST on NCp7. Representative backbone A) 15N-CPMG relaxation dispersion and B) 15N- and 13C′-CEST profiles observed for the C-Zn knuckle. C) 15N-CEST profiles for the Nε2 atom of the imidazole ring of His421. Relaxation dispersions were recorded at 600 (red) and 800 MHz (blue). CEST profiles were recorded at 600 MHz. For 15N-CEST constant-wave (CW) saturation was applied for TCEST = 200 ms at RF field strengths of 15 (blue) and 30 (red) Hz for backbone 15 N and 50 Hz for histidine side chain 15Nε2. For 13C′-CEST, TCEST = 300 ms with RF field strengths of 30 (blue) and 40 (red) Hz were used. The insets in (A)–(C) show 15N-CPMG and 15N-/13C′-CEST profiles for the corresponding residues of N-Zn. The experimental data are displayed as circles, and the global best-fits to a three-state exchange model (see Figure 3) as solid lines. For N-Zn residues (insets) and the 15Nε2-CEST profile (C), dashed lines are drawn purely to guide the eye. D) 15N chemical shift differences, ΔωAB (blue) and ΔωAC (red) between major and minor species derived from the fits to the experimental CPMG and CEST data. Note the Gly420 1HN/15N cross-peak is not observed due to line-broadening from water/amide proton exchange. Experiments were conducted at 30 °C and pH 6.5 in H2O on deuterated 15N or 15N/13C′-labeled samples. Details of experiments and data fitting are described in the Supporting Information.
Several lines of evidence point to the existence of multiple minor conformational states for the C-Zn knuckle. First, not all relaxation dispersion profiles could be adequately fit to a two-state (A↔B) exchange model, with the poorest fits observed for residues with the largest resulting Δω values. Second, fits of 15N-CEST data to a two-state exchange model for a subset of residues with well resolved minor intensity dips yielded very high values for the transverse relaxation rates (R2 ≈ 100–400 s−1 at 600 MHz) of the minor species, indicative of the presence of at least two minor states in intermediate exchange with one another. This finding is similar to previously observed line-broadening of the minor intensity dips in CEST profiles arising from an intermediate exchange process between folding intermediates of an FF domain.[11] Indeed, a pair of minor intensity dips is distinguishable in the 600 MHz 13C′-CEST (Figure 2B, right) and 800 MHz 15N-CEST (Supporting Information, Figure S3 at 800 MHz) profiles for Gln422. We note that the field-dependence (800 vs. 600 MHz) of exchange line-broadening of the minor species, Rex (approximately from the fits to a two-state model), for 15N-CEST profiles with either completely separated or completely coalesced minor dips, falls significantly short of the ratio of fields squared (1.78), indicating that interconversion between the minor states lies in the slow-to-intermediate regime.
As it seemed likely that the imidazole side-chain of His421 was directly implicated in one of the exchange processes, we also looked for evidence of exchange at the Nε2 site coordinated to zinc.[2a–e] A variant of the 15N-CEST experiment that exploits two-bond scalar couplings between the imidazole ring nitrogen atoms (15Nδ1 and 15Nε2) and the protons attached to the ring Cε1/Cδ2 carbons (2JHN ≈ 6–10 Hz),[12] was recorded (Figure 2C). No evidence for any CESTeffect was observed for the 15Nε2 atom of His400 in the N-Zn knuckle. In the C-Zn knuckle, however, the chemical shift of the 15Nε2 atom of His421 changes from 220.4 ppm, typical of a Zn2+-coordinated state,[13] to 170.3 ppm in the minor state, characteristic of protonation accompanying the breaking of the His421-Nε2–Zn bond. The chemical shift of the 15Nδ1 atom of His421 (172.5 ppm) in the major species is also indicative of a protonated state.[14] It is therefore likely that one of the forms of His421 in minor species B corresponds to a protonated, positively charged imidazole ring (Figure 3). Because the value of |ΔωN| is so large in this case (>50 ppm), the exchange regime for His421-Nε2 is shifted far to the slow extreme (|Δ ω̄N | τex ≫ 1), making it undetectable by CPMG relaxation dispersion. Further, quantitative analysis of the His421-Nε2 CEST profile is complicated by rapid interconversion between different tautomeric states of the imidazole ring,[15] leading to line-broadening of state B that is not accounted for by the three-state exchange model of Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kinetics and rate constants for exchange between native and sparsely-populated states of the C-Zn knuckle of NCp7. See the Supporting Information for the details of global fitting of the 15N-CPMG relaxation dispersion and 15N/13C′-CEST data.
The kinetic model that quantitatively accounts for all the 15N-CPMG relaxation dispersion and 15N/13C′-CEST data for the C-Zn knuckle is shown in Figure 3, and represents a three-state exchanging system where the major state (A; with all Zn coordinate bonds intact) interconverts with two sparsely populated species: B in which the His421-Nε2-Zn coordination bond is hydrolyzed, and C where a Cys-Sγ-Zn coordination bond is hydrolyzed. The two minor states B and C interconvert through the concomitant loss of water and recreation of the corresponding Zn-coordination bonds (Figure 3). As only 5 residues of the C-Zn knuckle provide well separated minor intensity dips in 15N-CEST profiles, whereas all 18 sites show significant relaxation dispersion (Rex > 3 s−1), we supplemented the 15N-CPMG (at 600 and 800 MHz) and 15N-CEST (600 MHz) data with 1) 15N-CEST profiles acquired at 800 MHz at a single RF field, and 2) 13C′-CEST profiles at two RF fields (Supporting Information, Table S1). The rationale for this approach is that CEST data acquired at another spectrometer field or for another type of nucleus increases the sensitivity of the data towards the exchange rates between the minor states B and C, as the exchange regime on the chemical shift timescale dictates the extent of line-broadening experienced by the nuclei of each minor state. Simultaneous fitting of the data to the three-state model (Figure 3) yields rate constants for the interconversion processes, as well as the populations and chemical shifts (Figure 2D; Supporting Information, Table S2) of the minor species. The two minor states B and C are approximately equally populated (ca. 1.4% and ca. 1.2%, respectively; Figure 3) and interconvert on the slow or intermediate timescale depending on the differences in their chemical shifts (|ΔωAB-ΔωAC|).
The chemical shift differences between the observable and invisible states help clarify the chemical nature of the minor species (Figure 2D). 15N-Δω values are localized in the vicinity of Cys413 and His421: specifically, His421 and Gln422, and to a lesser extent Gly417, for the A↔B process (Figure 2D, blue), and Trp414, Cys416, His421, and Gln422 for the A↔C process (Figure 2D, red). The largest 13C′-Δω values, manifested by discrete minor dips in the 13C′-CEST profiles, are observed for Trp414, Cys416, Gln422, Met423, and Lys424 (Supporting Information, Table S2). State B, therefore, likely corresponds to the state in which the His421-Nε2–Zn bond is hydrolyzed, consistent with the 15Nε2-CEST profile in Figure 2C. State C corresponds to the state in which the Cys413-Sγ–Zn is hydrolyzed, consistent with the mass spectrometry data indicating that the Cys413-Sγ is the site of initial acylation by mercaptobenzamide thioesters.[5] Note that it would be difficult to distinguish with certainty between Cys413 and Cys416 as the site of hydrolysis of the Sγ–Zn bond in the absence of any prior structural or mass spectrometry data.
The values of 15N-ΔωAC can be rationalized from the structure of the C-Zn knuckle[2e] as follows: no 15N shift change is observed for Cys413 owing to preservation of the backbone Cys413(N)–Lys418(O) bond; the large 15N shift difference for Cys416 is likely due to an alteration in the electronic state of the Sγ atom of Cys413 which is within hydrogen bonding distance (ca. 3.2 &) of the backbone nitrogen of Cys416; and the large 15N shift for Trp414 can be attributed to the altered state of the sidechain of the preceding residue,[16] Cys413. The backbone nitrogen of Gly417 is within 4.5 & of the Sγ atoms of both Cys413 and Cys416, and the significant changes in 15N shift for Gly417 in state B may be due to small changes in these distances as a consequence of hydrolysis of the His421-Nε2–Zn bond. Finally, the slightly larger 15N-Δω values of His421 and Gln422 for the A↔C than A↔B interconversion may perhaps be attributable to the larger electronegativity of Sγ relative to Nε2.
In terms of backbone conformation, it would be predicted that a loss of only a single protein-Zn coordinating bond would result in only minimal backbone perturbations relative to the major A state. Since 13Cα shifts are good reporters of backbone ϕ/ψ angles,[17] we recorded 13Cα-CPMG relaxation dispersions[18] on a selectively 13Cα-labeled[19] NCp7 sample (Supporting Information, Figure S4). The 13Cα-dispersions are relatively small with exchange line broadening Rex values of ≤5 s−1. The 13Cα-|ΔωAC| values are less than 1.5 ppm; three residues have 13Cα-|ΔωAB| values in excess of 1.5 ppm (Lys415, Met423 and Cys426) but none greater than about 3 ppm. One can therefore conclude that any changes in backbone torsion angles in the minor species are likely confined to the same preferred region of the Ramachandran map in which they are located in the major species.[17]
The rate constant for hydrolysis of the His421-Nε2–Zn bond (kAB ≈ 5.2 s−1) is about double that for the Cys413-Sγ–Zn bond (kAC ≈2.5 s−1) implying a lower activation energy for the former process, a finding consistent with the lower force required to break a His–Zn bond (ca. 30 pN) compared to a Cys–Zn bond (ca. 170 pN) determined by single-molecule atomic force microscopy measurements.[20] Further, the rate constants for coordinate bond formation (kBA and kCA in Figure 3) are not significantly different from those for interconversion between the two minor species B and C (kBC and kCB), as might be expected as they involve similar underlying processes.
In conclusion, the C-Zn knuckle of HIV-1 NCp7, but not the N-Zn knuckle, undergoes millisecond exchange at the zinc coordination site between a major species in which the zinc is coordinated to three cysteines and a histidine, and two minor excited dark states, populated at about 1%, in which one of the protein-Zn coordinating bonds, involving either His421 or Cys413, is hydrolyzed. Transient exposure of a reactive sulphydryl group renders the C-Zn knuckle susceptible to acylation by mercaptobenzamide thioesters, and provides proof of concept that a sparsely populated transient state of a protein can be targeted for drug design.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank R. Ghirlando and L. M. Miller-Jenkins for useful discussions, K. M. G. Rosenker and M. Scerba for mercapto-benzamide-1, L. E. Kay for 13C′-CEST and 13Cα dispersion pulse codes, D. S. Garrett for technical assistance, and J. Lloyd of the NIDDK Advanced Mass Spectrometry Core for technical support. This work was supported by the Intramural Program of NIDDK/NIH and the AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program of the Office of the NIH Director (to G.M.C.).
Footnotes
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201713172.
Contributor Information
Dr. Lalit Deshmukh, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892-0520 (USA).
Dr. Vitali Tugarinov, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892-0520 (USA)
Dr. Daniel H. Appella, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892-0830 (USA)
Dr. G. Marius Clore, Laboratory of Chemical Physics, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892-0520 (USA)
References
- 1.Darlix JL, de Rocquigny H, Mauffret O, Mely Y. Virus Res. 2014;193:2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.a) Omichinski JG, Clore GM, Sakaguchi K, Appella E, Gronenborn AM. FEBS Lett. 1991;292:25–30. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80825-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) De Guzman RN, Wu ZR, Stalling CC, Pappalardo L, Borer PN, Summers MF. Science. 1998;279:384–388. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Morellet N, Demene H, Teilleux V, Huynh-Dinh T, de Rocquigny H, Fournie-Zaluski MC, Roques BP. J Mol Biol. 1998;283:419–434. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Amarasinghe GK, De Guzman RN, Turner RB, Chancellor KJ, Wu ZR, Summers MF. J Mol Biol. 2000;301:491–511. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Goudreau N, Hucke O, Faucher AM, Grand-Maitre C, Lepage O, Bonneau PR, Mason SW, Titolo S. J Mol Biol. 2013;425:1982–1998. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Deshmukh L, Schwieters CD, Grishaev A, Clore GM. ChemPhysChem. 2016;17:1548–1552. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201600212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.a) Garg D, Torbett BE. Virus Res. 2014;193:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sancineto L, Iraci N, Tabarrini O, Santi C. Drug Discovery Today. 2017;0:0. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miller Jenkins LM, Byrd JC, Hara T, Srivastava P, Mazur SJ, Stahl SJ, Inman JK, Appella E, Omichinski JG, Legault P. J Med Chem. 2005;48:2847–2858. doi: 10.1021/jm0492195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miller Jenkins LM, Hara T, Durell SR, Hayashi R, Inman JK, Piquemal JP, Gresh N, Appella E. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11067–11078. doi: 10.1021/ja071254o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.a) Srivastava P, Schito M, Fattah RJ, Hara T, Hartman T, Buckheit RW, Jr, Turpin JA, Inman JK, Appella E. Bioorg Med Chem. 2004;12:6437–6450. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2004.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Miller Jenkins LM, Ott DE, Hayashi R, Coren LV, Wang D, Xu Q, Schito ML, Inman JK, Appella DHE. Nat Chem Biol. 2010;6:887–889. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Deshmukh L, Tugarinov V, Louis JM, Clore GM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:E9855–E9862. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716098114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Palmer AG., III J Magn Reson. 2014;241:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vallurupalli P, Sekhar A, Yuwen T, Kay LE. J Biomol NMR. 2017;67:243–271. doi: 10.1007/s10858-017-0099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.McConnell HM. J Chem Phys. 1958;28:430–431. [Google Scholar]
- 11.a) Vallurupalli P, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8148–8161. doi: 10.1021/ja3001419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Vallurupalli P, Kay LE. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2013;52:4156–4159. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew Chem. 2013;125:4250–4253. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Blomberg F, Maurer W, Ruterjans H. J Am Chem Soc. 1977;99:8149–8159. doi: 10.1021/ja00467a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kostic M, Matt T, Martinez-Yamout MA, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. J Mol Biol. 2006;363:433–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pelton JG, Torchia DA, Meadow ND, Roseman S. Protein Sci. 1993;2:543–558. doi: 10.1002/pro.5560020406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hass MA, Hansen DF, Christensen HE, Led JJ, Kay LE. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:8460–8470. doi: 10.1021/ja801330h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Williamson MP. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2013;73:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Spera S, Bax A. J Am Chem Soc. 1991;113:5490–5492. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Lundstrom P, Neudecker P, Kay LE. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:2667–2675. doi: 10.1021/ja078337p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lundstrçm P, Teilum K, Carstensen T, Bezsonova I, Wiesner S, Hansen DF, Religa TL, Akke M, Kay LE. J Biomol NMR. 2007;38:199–212. doi: 10.1007/s10858-007-9158-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.a) Beyer MK, Clausen-Schaumann H. Chem Rev. 2005;105:2921–2948. doi: 10.1021/cr030697h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zheng P, Li H. Biophys J. 2011;101:1467–1473. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.